“Read the fine print in those ads pushing The Pill as an acne medicine: using The Pill does increase the risk of breast cancer and heart attacks (but, Pill pushers say, that's not as dangerous as that dread disease pregnancy).”
pyrobryan on Mar 30, 2012 at 11:58:55
“They also decrease the risk of cervical cancer and endomitrial cancer. The breast cancer risk is primarily found through use of a certain type of pill (tri-phasal, if I remember that right).
Most medications have side-effects. As long as the consumer is aware of the potential dangers, it's their choice whether or not they choose to use the them.”
chamberwindow on Mar 30, 2012 at 11:54:19
“At least be honest. You don't care about increased risk of breast cancer and heart attacks in women. You are against women being free to have sex without having to procreate. The "Pill pushers" see women as more than Mindless Fertility Vessels.”
“Remember back when homosexuals claimed that they only wanted to be left alone? Now they won't leave Christians alone.”
scott2000 on Mar 7, 2012 at 03:36:35
“Please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please, PLEASE give me a f@#$ing break.”
Mamadea on Mar 7, 2012 at 02:02:24
“You win the most ignorant post of the day.”
Dosadi on Mar 6, 2012 at 20:44:27
Were you recruited or something?
blackgrl71 on Mar 6, 2012 at 15:27:29
“I think a fourth-grader could provide a better argument than yours. Besides when's the last time a gay person was handing out pamphlets or magazines by old ladies to promote (more like harass) their ideas. Or my (un)favorite, is when entire families or creepy young men are knocking on your door hoping to share their 'opinions' w/ you. Whatever, that argument doesn't even have a leg to stand on.”
BadKitty on Mar 6, 2012 at 13:28:03
“Christians attack the lgbt community vociferously and regularly. It is the dogma of the ignorant which has been pushing, hard, against things their small minds cannot embrace. So, instead of embracing the logical alternative would be to live and let live. Christians, however, won't do that. Instead they attack and demean and attempt to control. The only way forward for those in the lgbt community and those who support their rights is to push back.”
“There was this guy called Joseph Ratzinger who wrote to the US bishops in 2004 to remind them that Catholics can disagree about war anf the death penalty, "but not, however, in regard to abortion and euthanasia."
He's now known as Benedict XVI.”
“If the New Black Panther Party is a civil rights group, why aren't the Nazis?”
Patriotology on Apr 10, 2012 at 14:27:33
“They are classified as a hate group, specifically a Black Separatist one, by the Southern Poverty Law Center no less. You'd like to take a bunch of crazy radicals and paint the whole black population as New Black Panthers, well two can play that game, how long have you been a Neo-Nazi? All white people t are represented by the Aryan Brotherhood or the Aryan Nations by default right?
Even the original Black Panther Party disavows the NBP as racist and a hate group. For you to show up here and spout this nonsense is deplorable. Secondly the Black Separatists and the White Separatists actually have alliances between some of their groups since their goals coincide in many respects, separate cultures, separate governments, no racial intermarriage, and a shared hatred of Jews. Anyway, your ignorance is astounding and it's easy to believe in your bubble that the NBP is some black popular group like The Tea Baggers, but you'd be wrong. Just like me saying since most White Racist groups arewhite therefore all whites must be white supremacists is no more correct than you saying since all NBP are black all blacks must be NBP.”
CSKAP on Apr 10, 2012 at 14:15:10
“They aren’t a “civil rights group either.
Just for your clarification. “civil rights groups” are formed to ensure that all people have equal rights, not just one group.
The Nazi are saying they are specific to whites as the Panthers are to blacks.
The only difference is that Fox News broadcasts scares about the “New Black Panthers” taking over the country daily and seems to let the Neo-Nazis do as they will”
Jake Dogg on Apr 10, 2012 at 14:13:25
“But both groups are a bad thing.”
Just a passerby on Apr 10, 2012 at 14:12:59
“and who said they were?”
Jake Dogg on Apr 10, 2012 at 14:12:17
“You answered that question with the word nazi.”
LisaMarieC on Apr 10, 2012 at 14:11:49
taddles on Apr 10, 2012 at 14:11:48
“I'm sure in your mind there is an equivalence.”
dmgoss on Apr 10, 2012 at 14:09:57
“They aren't. It was Fox News and Republican media operatives that ginned that nonsense up. Two guys standing outside of a polling place don't make an organization anyway, even if, with their friends, they can fill the seats in a Chevy Suburban...”
BZ Parrothead on Apr 10, 2012 at 14:09:50
“I've never seen the New Black Panther Party called a civil rights group on the media. They may call themselves that, but the press hasn't.”
Curandera on Apr 10, 2012 at 14:06:08
“Can you link to anywhere in the world that cites the New Black Panther Party as a civil rights group? Yeah, I thought not.”
hhl482 on Apr 10, 2012 at 14:05:19
“Who said that?”
MikeDu on Apr 10, 2012 at 14:03:36
“Don't you ultra-righties ever get tired of false equivalents?”
MarinaLoves on Apr 10, 2012 at 14:03:03
“who called the new black panther party a civil rights groups?”
“"'Fox does this intentionally ALL OF [the] TIME"? then why do none of the liberal watchdog groups ever catch it doing that? And by the way, when is Reuters going to show a picture of Treyvon Martin that isn't years old, like the one of Treyvon showing off his gold teeth, or an unblurred police video that shows Zimmerman with the wounds on his head?”
BillForObama on Apr 30, 2012 at 00:09:10
“They do catch them all the time. Fix News is Joke News.”