EbonBear's Comments (697)
The Irrefutable Stupidity of Sarah Palin
Commented Dec 08, 2009 at 06:29:24 in Politics
“I consdier it the resurrection of Know-Nothingism.”
The Irrefutable Stupidity of Sarah Palin
Commented Dec 08, 2009 at 06:28:08 in Politics
“You're partly right. Also, she's wielding a lot of power on the ultraright, the Teabagging militia crowd, not the mainstream right.”
The Irrefutable Stupidity of Sarah Palin
Commented Dec 08, 2009 at 06:17:10 in Politics
“Obama was never as universally beloved as the right believed. Yes, he had (and still has) his hardcore of worshipful supporters but the majority of us just thought "he'll do". And yes, maybe we got caught up in his charisma and the excitement of the moment.
With Palin, it's not hatred on the normal sense. It's more like a mixture of incredulity that anyone could take her seriously; amusement at her constant gaffes which is always a needed commodity (Biden has been disappointingly quiet, I was expecting him to be a satirical goldmine) and massive irritation at the wingers telling us we're terrified of her. In reality, we want to see Palin run more than the right wanted to campaign against Hillary. There's also frustration that these people live in a completely different reality where Palin is the wildly electable genius poised to take office.”
With Palin, it's not hatred on the normal sense. It's more like a mixture of incredulity that anyone could take her seriously; amusement at her constant gaffes which is always a needed commodity (Biden has been disappointingly quiet, I was expecting him to be a satirical goldmine) and massive irritation at the wingers telling us we're terrified of her. In reality, we want to see Palin run more than the right wanted to campaign against Hillary. There's also frustration that these people live in a completely different reality where Palin is the wildly electable genius poised to take office.”
Health Care Reform: The End Is Nigh
Commented Dec 08, 2009 at 06:01:36 in Politics
“I live in the UK, under single-payer. While it's not perfect, it is (despite the occasional headline-grabbing scandal) pretty d@mn good.
Amount spent on current Medicaid, Medicare, private insurance mess: aprox $2.3 trillion.
Cost to cover entire US population under NHS model: aprox $600 billion (not counting start-up costs).
But let's say American's are markedly less healthy than Brits (as the antis often do), let's push the price up to a trillion. It's STILL less than half of what's currently being paid and, while there are and always will be problems, in general and on the whole, it works well.
But because this conversation was always about money, not care; you're forced into the soul-destroying discussion of how many can be allowed to d!e to save a few cents on taxes.”
Amount spent on current Medicaid, Medicare, private insurance mess: aprox $2.3 trillion.
Cost to cover entire US population under NHS model: aprox $600 billion (not counting start-up costs).
But let's say American's are markedly less healthy than Brits (as the antis often do), let's push the price up to a trillion. It's STILL less than half of what's currently being paid and, while there are and always will be problems, in general and on the whole, it works well.
But because this conversation was always about money, not care; you're forced into the soul-destroying discussion of how many can be allowed to d!e to save a few cents on taxes.”
The Born Insanity
Commented Dec 06, 2009 at 05:22:44 in Politics
“In the process, they also have to falsify history to make fascism remotely compatible with any left-wing ideaology (fascism being on the ultra-right and directly opposed to socialism and communism).”
The Born Insanity
Commented Dec 06, 2009 at 05:17:00 in Politics
“Sadly, you now have a whole segment of the population that actually believes the rewritten history that the right has been putting out for a generation. They actually believe that the Founders were all Christians and mostly evangelicals; that seperation of church and state is a lie; that fascism is a left-wing ideaology, etc. At the core is their committment to the idea that if the facts do not agree with their existing beliefs, it is the facts which are wrong, never them.”
The Born Insanity
Commented Dec 06, 2009 at 05:12:21 in Politics
“Better idea: Let's colonise another planet and leave the Birthers, Birchers, teabaggers and crazies here. That way, we also get a new planet that we can take care of while they continue wrecking this one.”
The Born Insanity
Commented Dec 06, 2009 at 05:09:50 in Politics
“Well, I suppose it's just about possible that he could be a Terminator but I'm willing to accept the lack of murderous intent and minigun as reasonable evidence to the contrary.”
The Born Insanity
Commented Dec 06, 2009 at 05:06:41 in Politics
“Old Roma saying: "One madman makes many madmen and many madmen make madness". If you allow the madman to spread his bile unchecked by truth, he will convert more until, finally, there are enough to be a problem.”
The Born Insanity
Commented Dec 06, 2009 at 05:04:41 in Politics
“I, for one, welcome our new cyborg overlords.”
Nagarjuna replied on Dec 06, 2009 at 18:05:05
“I also am willing to toil in their underground sugar caves.”
The Born Insanity
Commented Dec 06, 2009 at 05:03:29 in Politics
“That's because the Democrats (being the adults in this particular conversation) passed a bill during the 2006-2008 Congress, recognising the citizenship of those born in the Panama Canal Zone.”
Obama Right in the Middle
Commented Dec 05, 2009 at 12:59:27 in Politics
“And so, it becomes self-perpetuating. Thank you, by the way. That was the first plausable answer I've had to that question.”
It's a Helluva State
Commented Dec 05, 2009 at 10:02:47 in New York
“Which adds still more to the point.”
Obama Right in the Middle
Commented Dec 05, 2009 at 09:59:14 in Politics
“Yes, I do know that. I think you've rather missed the point I was making.”
Obama Right in the Middle
Commented Dec 05, 2009 at 07:36:44 in Politics
“Lex Luthor was a thinker too. I'm not suggesting Obama is trying to take over the world but deep thought doesn't matter a whole lot unless it results in the right conclusion.”
JiminNC replied on Dec 05, 2009 at 09:20:12
“Lex Luthor was a comic book character”
Obama Right in the Middle
Commented Dec 05, 2009 at 07:35:41 in Politics
“Question: Why is it always we on the left who must compromise? The right hasn't compromised on a thing. They're approach has been to plant themselves firmly, not move an inch, force the Democrats to come to their position and call the result compromise. We have already "compromised" on gay rights, on both wars, on Gitmo, on the bank bailout, on the stimulus. We have "compromised" on all of those. When do WE start getting something back?
Additionally, the right are ALREADY calling Obama a social!st, commie and Naz! (proving that they don't understand that Naz!s were on the extreme-right). He's already got a portion of the electorate which could not possibly get more opposed to his presidency without starting another civil war. When one is already taking the hit for supposedly being ultra-left, one may as well go ultraleft anyway. Without a public option, the healthcare bill is nothing more than a funnel for yet more money to go to the (already obscene) profits of the insurance companies.”
Additionally, the right are ALREADY calling Obama a social!st, commie and Naz! (proving that they don't understand that Naz!s were on the extreme-right). He's already got a portion of the electorate which could not possibly get more opposed to his presidency without starting another civil war. When one is already taking the hit for supposedly being ultra-left, one may as well go ultraleft anyway. Without a public option, the healthcare bill is nothing more than a funnel for yet more money to go to the (already obscene) profits of the insurance companies.”
masher replied on Dec 05, 2009 at 12:41:02
“Because many on the left are weak kneed surrender monkeys. One thing the right is... well right about is that the left doesn't stand up for itself. And that is why many leave for the right. And that is why the right has such contempt for the left.
I'm not saying this is a good thing or right. I'm just explaining as best I can what happens. Not just here but everywhere. Nobody respects people who are weak. And Democratic leadership acts weak all the time.”
I'm not saying this is a good thing or right. I'm just explaining as best I can what happens. Not just here but everywhere. Nobody respects people who are weak. And Democratic leadership acts weak all the time.”
JiminNC replied on Dec 05, 2009 at 09:18:28
“Because they have the power to force compromise. It is always just as simple as it looks. The people with big money buy the people who make the rules ... as many as it takes.”
It's a Helluva State
Commented Dec 05, 2009 at 05:16:57 in New York
“Which isn't the same as not caring at all.
Still, I have to applaud your committment.”
Still, I have to applaud your committment.”
It's a Helluva State
Commented Dec 05, 2009 at 05:16:09 in New York
“I didn't vote for Obama.
I would imagine that many of those who did vote for him (on this issue anyway) did so on the premise that he appeared to be less actively anti-gay than the Palin/McCain ticket. For many, this is just another issue among many and, if Obama disagrees with them on this; well, at least he agrees on X, Y or Z. For a few of us, this really is a huge civil rights issue and we wouldn't dream of voting for someone who didn't want full same-sex marriage (which, I believe, leaves only Kucinich on the Dem side). It's the difference between a voter who will impose a litmus test and one who won't.”
I would imagine that many of those who did vote for him (on this issue anyway) did so on the premise that he appeared to be less actively anti-gay than the Palin/McCain ticket. For many, this is just another issue among many and, if Obama disagrees with them on this; well, at least he agrees on X, Y or Z. For a few of us, this really is a huge civil rights issue and we wouldn't dream of voting for someone who didn't want full same-sex marriage (which, I believe, leaves only Kucinich on the Dem side). It's the difference between a voter who will impose a litmus test and one who won't.”
Sarah's Palling Around with Conspiracists
Commented Dec 05, 2009 at 01:12:33 in Politics
“Dear Lord *insert name here*,
Please let this patholigically dishonest, self-obsessed, dim-witted bully run for the Republican nomination. Please let her win the nomination, Lord, and be the Republican candidate. And please let her pick someone as shallow and lunatic-fringe as she is for her Vice-President (Michelle Bachman would be a good choice).
After that, Lord, you can put your feet up, crack open a can of whatever you drink and watch the ensuing hilarity as President Obama cruises to a Reagan-Mondale style crushing victory. Oh, and if you could possibly arrange matters so we can see the look on Sean Hannity's face live as the results come in, that would be sweet.
Amen.”
Please let this patholigically dishonest, self-obsessed, dim-witted bully run for the Republican nomination. Please let her win the nomination, Lord, and be the Republican candidate. And please let her pick someone as shallow and lunatic-fringe as she is for her Vice-President (Michelle Bachman would be a good choice).
After that, Lord, you can put your feet up, crack open a can of whatever you drink and watch the ensuing hilarity as President Obama cruises to a Reagan-Mondale style crushing victory. Oh, and if you could possibly arrange matters so we can see the look on Sean Hannity's face live as the results come in, that would be sweet.
Amen.”
Eykis replied on Dec 05, 2009 at 08:27:47
“Ebon,.
PERFRECT. Stupannity does have a PERSONAL problem with POTUS. You can hear it in his voice on the radio and see it in his face on teevee. Stupannity is the equivalent of Snowbilly Grifter. The same four or five points, NO IDEAS, NO SOLUTIONS, they operate on simple RACISM and HATE of what they are too ignorant and uneducated to understand.
There are so many ill-informed and ignorant in America who prefer to remain that way, which is what cause the rise of Snowbilly Grifter and the Pathetic Pack of Palinites along with Stuppannnity and Faux Noise.
Sadly, this has made America dangerous. The foment violence in their talk while espousing their version of "values".”
PERFRECT. Stupannity does have a PERSONAL problem with POTUS. You can hear it in his voice on the radio and see it in his face on teevee. Stupannity is the equivalent of Snowbilly Grifter. The same four or five points, NO IDEAS, NO SOLUTIONS, they operate on simple RACISM and HATE of what they are too ignorant and uneducated to understand.
There are so many ill-informed and ignorant in America who prefer to remain that way, which is what cause the rise of Snowbilly Grifter and the Pathetic Pack of Palinites along with Stuppannnity and Faux Noise.
Sadly, this has made America dangerous. The foment violence in their talk while espousing their version of "values".”
It's a Helluva State
Commented Dec 05, 2009 at 01:11:35 in New York
“Americans didn't want interracial marriage either. And just because they voted for him doesn't mean they agree with him on every issue.”
4evright replied on Dec 05, 2009 at 02:48:19
“I would think that if a person is extremely passionate about such an issue and compares it to the black civil rights movement of the 60s, they could never vote for a man who won't allow gay marriage. If its truly that important, how could you possibly vote for Obama? Its the same with abortion. Pro-lifers are so passionate that they would never vote for a pro-choice candidate no matter how much they agree with the candidate on every other issue.”
It's a Helluva State
Commented Dec 05, 2009 at 01:09:21 in New York
“The same Constitution that only grants the vote to land-owning white males? Don't confuse teh Founder's doubtless good intentions with perfection.”
4 Real replied on Dec 05, 2009 at 01:48:47
“Or the same constitution that said a black men was considered three fifths human for census count.
I wish people wouldn't use the constitution in their defense without knowing what was written in it. Back them the founders were slave owners and did not believe in equality.
I would like to think as we evolve as a society, so do our laws but with comments like RR, it's obvious some people do not wish to.”
I wish people wouldn't use the constitution in their defense without knowing what was written in it. Back them the founders were slave owners and did not believe in equality.
I would like to think as we evolve as a society, so do our laws but with comments like RR, it's obvious some people do not wish to.”
It's a Helluva State
Commented Dec 05, 2009 at 01:07:38 in New York
“1) The meaning of marriage has changed many times. Prior to Christianity, polygamy was the rule. Up until quite recently, a married man literally OWNED his wife. The view of marriage as a union of two equals is actually quite recent.
2) If the full package of legal rights and responsibilities was granted, I personally don't care if you call it "Bob" but the distinction still places gay couples in a lesser category than straight couples. Unless the law is carefully written to ensure presumption of equivelency (that is, that civil union and marriage are to be presumed identical in the eyes of the law), you are still going to have a difference in rights. Here in England, we have Domestic Partnerships which are identical in all respects but the very, very technical (like exactly how "consummation" is defined) and people have called it "marriage" since teh act first became law.
3) The USA has a very bad history with "seperate but equal".”
2) If the full package of legal rights and responsibilities was granted, I personally don't care if you call it "Bob" but the distinction still places gay couples in a lesser category than straight couples. Unless the law is carefully written to ensure presumption of equivelency (that is, that civil union and marriage are to be presumed identical in the eyes of the law), you are still going to have a difference in rights. Here in England, we have Domestic Partnerships which are identical in all respects but the very, very technical (like exactly how "consummation" is defined) and people have called it "marriage" since teh act first became law.
3) The USA has a very bad history with "seperate but equal".”
scottowego replied on Dec 05, 2009 at 08:50:19
“Popes were allowed to be married in the early church too.
http://www.futurechurch.org/fpm/history.htm”
http://www.futurechurch.org/fpm/history.htm”
LegalCodex replied on Dec 05, 2009 at 02:13:22
“"Prior to Christianity, polygamy was the rule."
Polygamy was allowed in early Christianity too. The main reason it was eventually abolished by Christian states is that you would end up with a lot of unhappy men when the richest 1% gets to marry all the women they can afford(this derives from the fact that fathers, in effect, would sell their daughters into marriage for increased social status).”
Polygamy was allowed in early Christianity too. The main reason it was eventually abolished by Christian states is that you would end up with a lot of unhappy men when the richest 1% gets to marry all the women they can afford(this derives from the fact that fathers, in effect, would sell their daughters into marriage for increased social status).”
It's a Helluva State
Commented Dec 05, 2009 at 01:01:40 in New York
“And, in about five years, the rest of the country notices that MA has a happy population with a low divorce rate, is swimming in cash and a true-blue liberal stronghold and asks the MA state government what the secret is. "Well", says the MA state government, "I think it started when we legalised gay marriage"...”
Sarah's Palling Around with Conspiracists
Commented Dec 05, 2009 at 00:50:27 in Politics
“Joe Wilson was factually, provably and irrefutably WRONG.”


