HuffPost Social News

EducatedObserver's Comments (135)

View Comments:   Sort:
next
1 - 25 of 135
huffingtonpost entry

Tiger Woods Deserves Your Scrutiny

Commented Dec 01, 2009 at 07:00:56 in Sports

“And why, pray tell, does Mr Woods "deserve" our scrutiny?

For that matter, why on earth should any of these outrageously remunerated sportspeople or celebrities be accorded the sort of adulation and attention they receive? For doing what?

Are our lives so vacant, that we must fill our time worshipping people who run and jump and grin at cameras?

Mr Zirin, I suggest that we are the ones who should be "scrutinised" for our rather peculiar value system.”

kwalters replied on Dec 01, 2009 at 16:36:15

“Mr. Zirin is basically making this point. Next time read the article.”
huffingtonpost entry

Is Constituency Democracy Destroying The U.S.A.?

Commented Dec 01, 2009 at 05:31:53 in Politics

“I do not have as much of a problem with the content of Mr Walker's piece, as I do with his puzzlingly arrogant suggestion that there is something wrong with - as he puts it - "constituency democracy".

I presume he is speaking about the Westminster form of parliamentary democracy, which seems to be working quite well in countries such as Canada, Australia, India and so on.

I would also like to remind the author that elements of this form of government are spread throughout the current American system which, lest we forget, owes much of its democratic traditions to the British.”

hp blogger Paul David Walker replied on Dec 01, 2009 at 19:59:23

“Thank you. It seems some themes are developing. I will be summarizing everyone's comments in the next blog. It would be very helpful if each of you could please read through all the comments, and then post again with additional insights that come from your reading.”
Second Thoughts on the Obama Peace Prize

Second Thoughts on the Obama Peace Prize

Commented Nov 29, 2009 at 07:09:48 in Politics

“The intrinsic value of the Nobel Peace prize was diminished some time before it was bestowed on Mr Obama.

Sins of commission - giving the award to Al Gore and Jimmy Carter as an obvious political repudiation of George Bush II for example - and omission - the puzzling absence of Mahatma Gandhi as a laureate - have long demonstrated that the Committee does not always act with purity of purpose.”

MalleusMaleficarum replied on Nov 29, 2009 at 09:21:22

“An educated question: Why does the repudiation of War Criminal Bush constitute a sin of commission by the Nobel Committee?

Another: Why not award a Peace Prize to the world's leading advocate of environmental preservation?

Another: Why not award a Peace Prize to a former president who engineered the Camp David Accords and continues to spearhead the global campaign for peace in the Middle East?

Another: Are you a fan of Dick Cheney, Binyamin Netanyahu, Donald Rumsfeld, Avidgor Lieberman, Condoleezza Rice and Joe Lieberman?”
huffingtonpost entry

Invictus Translation: Obama Needs Rugby

Commented Nov 28, 2009 at 09:33:00 in Entertainment

“Miss Ezell,

I humbly suggest that the very good reason why Messers Mandela and Obama are not linked more closely in people's minds is the same reason why so many were bewildered and even outraged at the news that the young American president was to be awarded a Nobel Peace prize.

Nelson Mandela's life is an inspiration for us all - for what he sacrificed, for how he struggled and finally, for what he achieved.

As far as I am aware, apart from winning a general election, what has Mr Obama accomplished?”
huffingtonpost entry

Polanski's Release From Prison

Commented Nov 28, 2009 at 08:58:26 in Entertainment

“While I would not necessarily go as far as Mr Levy has in showering Roman Polanski with adulation, I do applaud the French intellectual's courage in taking a stand which he realises is deeply unpopular in Conservative America.

The Polanski issue is certainly complex, and ought to be approached with perhaps a bit more dispassion than I have so far witnessed in the US media.”

seranvali replied on Nov 29, 2009 at 18:58:53

“You don't have to be conservative to know that rape is wrong.”

AnimalLover6 replied on Nov 28, 2009 at 14:40:20

“There's nothing "complex" about it. Get real.”

Ken Nemeth replied on Nov 28, 2009 at 13:13:54

“I beg you, please, please read the court testimony of the victim posted at The Smoking Gun. Roman Polanski plied a 13 year old girl with Champagne and quaaludes then proceeded to ra.pe and sod.omize her despite her repeated attempts to ask him to stop. This is why Roman Polanski is deeply unpopular in America.
This is not a complex issue. Polanski is a child rapist who fled the country to avoid prosecution and the only reason he was never brought to justice is because he happens to have made some good films in his life.
There is no courage here, only many people's lack of understanding of the gravity of his crime.
What if it was your daughter / sister / mother that this happened to?
If Roman Polanski leaves house arrest and goes back to France, it will be yet another example of how the vast majority of the world doesn't care about ra.pe.”

jackstpaul replied on Nov 28, 2009 at 11:33:30

“M. Levy isn't writing for an American audience. It's being translated into English from his other outlets.”

roshni replied on Nov 28, 2009 at 11:17:38

“I would go so far as to say Levy is showering Polanski with adulation with very little regard to facts.”

IntoTheMystic replied on Nov 28, 2009 at 11:04:33

“A French intellectual doesn't need courage to take an unpopular stance. It's in the job description.

By the way, Levy's stance is deeply unpopular in ALL of America, and, from what I read, in all of France as well.”

StevenM replied on Nov 28, 2009 at 09:27:55

“How so? Is Polanski guilty of rape? Is Polanski a fugitive from American justice? Where is the complexity of which you speak?”
Why Are These Artists Defending Pedophiles?

Why Are These Artists Defending Pedophiles?

Commented Nov 28, 2009 at 02:33:34 in Entertainment

“Thank you Dnietz, for responding to my post.

It is obvious that you feel strongly about this matter. I do respect your sentiments, and what appears to be your fervent desire to protect the weaker amongst us.

As civilised, intelligent people however, it behooves us to approach difficult issues (such as this one) dispassionately.

Tthere are more colours in the universe than black and white; intellectuals understand this and are in my view, rightly celebrated for their exceptionalism.”

blue chip replied on Nov 28, 2009 at 08:59:54

“EducatedObserver: I have actually done some research on this topic. As I mentioned in another comment I made on this article, perhaps one of the more incredible conclusions I have been forced to draw is that becoming hysterical about "sending out signals" and about making clear that rape is a serious crime is actually having the opposite to intended effect on many children - that in force fitting a black and white picture to reality we as a society are actually unintentionally fostering the abuse of children rather than limiting it. When children apparently see the light and realise they were abused (a process which commonly takes weeks or months), we become ever more convinced we have done the right thing, and are encouraged to continue applying these techniques ever more vehemently.

This is why I am very vocal on this issue, and I am aware it can come across as unempathetic. However, I think one of the best things we could do to protect children is not to increase legislation further and further, but to simply take it upon ourselves to accept that, ok, some things may be irresponsible, but do not actually have to be abusive if we simply choose not to interpret them as such. This way we can focus on the real problems, rather than being sidetracked by more minor issues.”
Why Are These Artists Defending Pedophiles?

Why Are These Artists Defending Pedophiles?

Commented Nov 28, 2009 at 01:26:58 in Entertainment

“Very good piece Johann.

Obviously any form of abuse is reprehensible, as it invariably involves someone of power imposing their will on a weaker individual. That is beyond doubt.

What makes me uncomfortable however, is the tendency in many societies to overlegislate human behaviour - this in effect, is another example of the powerful exercising dominion over the weaker.

For as you rightly point out, the matter of adolescent sexuality is a significant grey area. Indeed, there is a world of a difference between someone who is thirteen and someone who is seventeen.

It seems that artists and intellectuals are some of the few who are corageous enough to think outside the rigid parameters many societies have established on this subject - and perhaps that is not a bad thing.”

SonofLiberty1 replied on Nov 28, 2009 at 09:55:15

“But the so-called "Rigid Parameters" are there for good reason. They aren't just rules made to be broken but adhered to because they protect.”

Dnietz replied on Nov 28, 2009 at 01:56:34

“rape is not abuse. rape is rape. rape is only 2nd to murder on the scale of horrific crimes

if legislating human behavior is necessary to make sure people understand that rape will not be tolerated, then so be it. this should not be a gray area. it is either consensual or it is not. minors cannot give concent. simple concept.

of course adolescent sexuality has significant gray areas. but that is for our culture and social systems to work on. that is for our adolescents to figure out. adolescents can "discover" whatever they need from counselors, teachers, and experimenting amongst themselves. they don't need an adult to come into the mix and take advantage of ignorance and sully someone's childhood.

of course intellectuals need to explore and make people think. they just can't use actual adolescents or children to do it. i know i know, it makes the research hard, but that is how it has to be. and intellectuals do not get any "get out of jail free" cards or "one free criminal act" passes.”
The First Ten Lies from <em>Going Rogue</em>

The First Ten Lies from Going Rogue

Commented Nov 17, 2009 at 10:02:41 in Books

“The attention being given to the former governor's treatise is worth a wry chuckle.

For, if the comments - and number of articles - on this newspaper are anything to go by, I imagine that Mrs Palin must now be chortling with glee at the interest her book has generated in left-wing America.

As they say - "there is no such thing as bad publicity.­"”

octoberxs replied on Nov 18, 2009 at 11:01:53

“Actually the percentage of those going to buy Palin's book as never changed. Those that didn't want her book to begin with are seeing what they thought being supported by the media reviews. Seeing they were right does not create an impulse to go out and buy her book. Those that will follow Palin off a cliff will buy her book no matter what the reviews are. There is nothing shocking or new in the book that will change her image within either group. The media can keep her book as a top story for a decade and it will not change the actual book sales.”

libertaswv replied on Nov 17, 2009 at 14:56:41

“I have no doubt you are correct - that would be perfectly in line with the grasp of American politics we've seen from her thus far.

She can chuckle all she wants.....­Palin is the best thing to happen to the Left since GWB took office.

Rage on, Sarah! Every TV show! Every magazine! Please!!”
huffingtonpost entry

Not Supposed to Happen in Obama Land: Intrigue Behind Gregory Craig's Resignation

Commented Nov 16, 2009 at 19:33:05 in Politics

“I suggest Mr Clemons, that only those people living in cloud cuckoo land would be surprised by this development.

Lest we forget, this current White House is teeming with Chicago politicians, well-schooled in the art of political stagecraft.

"Change we can believe in" was ultimately a brilliant marketing slogan that won the election.”

ckfan replied on Nov 16, 2009 at 23:04:06

“ALL elections are won by brilliant marketing AND campaign strategies. Why would Obama's be any different?”
No One Is More American Than I Am

No One Is More American Than I Am

Commented Nov 11, 2009 at 18:03:10 in Politics

“And who pray tell, is a Muslim American?

Is this as opposed to say, a Christian American?

Mr Uygur, I suggest that one way to be considered more "American" is to first do away with such ridiculous nomenclatures.”

BruceHNV replied on Nov 12, 2009 at 11:55:47

“That was, after all, his whole point. Sorry you missed it.”
Mr. President: I Challenge You To Quit!

Mr. President: I Challenge You To Quit!

Commented Nov 07, 2009 at 01:14:18 in Living

“Again, I am no great supporter of this president, but isn't it a tad bizarre to expect the man to give up smoking at this particular time in his life?

And all of you out there worried about "role models"; I've never seen Mr Obama do it in public view since he assumed the higest office in the land.”

SinisterK9 replied on Nov 07, 2009 at 01:53:25

“There is never a good time to quit. Either do or don't. I don't really care if the POTUS wants to quit or not, it's his choice, and he is an adult.

This video/blog however is hilarious. A woman who is also a smoker is challenging the President to quit smoking.”

IDIOTA replied on Nov 07, 2009 at 01:37:56

“Well, he makes up for this bad habit by working out everyday, in my opinion. Breathing the air near refineries or freeways is probably a lot more toxic than smoking a few packs of cigarettes per year. I refer you to Richmond, CA.”
Tell Us: What Should Restaurant Diners Never Do?

Tell Us: What Should Restaurant Diners Never Do?

Commented Nov 06, 2009 at 01:49:05 in Style

“Hmm - interesting article. My suggestions - they should never:

1. Attempt to speak with a full mouth.

2. Speak on a telephone or text.

3. Fail to use the correct utensils correctly.

4. Fail to use the napkin correctly (no collar tucking!)

5. Request a condiment that comes in a plastic bottle.

Of course the list is longer, but these are the main infractions, in my experience.”
Bittergate: the Untold Story Behind the Story that Rocked the Obama Campaign

Bittergate: the Untold Story Behind the Story that Rocked the Obama Campaign

Commented Nov 06, 2009 at 00:43:45 in Books

“Mr Obama's middle class bona fides are by now impeccable and immutable.

We are I am sure, deeply impressed by his fondness for arugula, European adulation and joy at having won the Nobel prize.

May I however suggest, that the ordinary folk in the Middle America, might require a little more convincing about the president's commitment to their part of the country.”
huffingtonpost entry

Make No Mistake, Tuesday's GOP Surge Was About Obama

Commented Nov 05, 2009 at 13:10:04 in Politics

“I am inclined to agree once again with Mr Hutchinson, although I would add that in the main, Americans are beginning to suspect that Mr Obama is more interested in his own PR, than the good of the American nation, Republicans and Democrats.

For all those straining to defend the indefensible - that this result does not presage what is likely to happen in next year's elections.­..

Watch this space.”
huffingtonpost entry

The Original Power Couple Emerges Again With Hillary on Top...

Commented Nov 03, 2009 at 13:17:25 in Politics

“Absolutely correct, TommyMcCarthy.

That others cannot - or do not wish to - see the perversity of Clinton as SOS when she is manifestly suited - temperamentally - to be president is beyond comprehension.”
huffingtonpost entry

Leadership, Obama Style

Commented Nov 02, 2009 at 22:06:25 in Politics

“ezet22,

I submit that we have had our fill of the Hosannas surrounding Mr Obama's "historic" presidency.

And if anything, the problem with Mr Westen's critique is that it does not go far enough.

Mr Obama raised expectations during his campaign; now he is obliged to deliver. End of story.”

ezet22 replied on Nov 02, 2009 at 22:49:32

“He said. 'This election is not about him but us.' The question is, 'What are we doing?”
huffingtonpost entry

The Original Power Couple Emerges Again With Hillary on Top...

Commented Nov 02, 2009 at 20:44:11 in Politics

“I am sometimes bewildered by the enduring public fascination with the Clinton relationship.

Be that as it may, I suggest there is much to be admired about the Bill and Hillary partnership. It has for the most part been conducted with dignity, efficiency of purpose and intelligence in its pursuit of public goals.

I submit that the Clinton alliance is far more modern than that of the Obamas, which is - at the moment anyway - the more temperamentally ordinary and traditional union.”

party-of-one replied on Nov 03, 2009 at 05:28:49

“There is no doubt that the Clinton arrangement has given each of them much of what they want, and caarried them both to the heights of power and wealth. I think the issue of whether it has been conducted with dignity and good judgment is highly debatable. It certainly seems more self-serving than service minded.”
Golfing with Hillary's Ghost

Golfing with Hillary's Ghost

Commented Oct 31, 2009 at 11:29:50 in Politics

“Of course people are still peeved, and rightly so.

In 2008 American Democrats, spoonfed as they are by too many years of Disneyland and left wing political thought, turned the competition between Clinton and Obama into a beauty pageant.

It mattered not that the woman was manifestly more intelligent, pugnacious and experienced than her opponent.

In the end, the candidate with the bigger smile, sweeter voice and more compelling back-story won.”

Housewife replied on Oct 31, 2009 at 15:08:36

“No, the candidate who ran the smarter, disciplined more efficient grass roots campaign won.”

JimR replied on Oct 31, 2009 at 14:22:37

“Is she more intelligent? No. More pugnacious? Only when it comes to things that personally benefit her. More experienced? That's a laugh. She was married to the president once. Sorry, that doesn't count as experience. She served one term as Senator. That's it. So basically, she had a few more years in the Senate than Obama did.”
huffingtonpost entry

Obama's White House is for Sale Just like All the Others

Commented Oct 30, 2009 at 01:52:38 in Politics

“I am beginning to become quite a fan of Mr Hutchinson. You are one of the few who writers on this paper who has always resisted walking in lockstep with the Obama PR apparatus.

Long may it continue.”

upbeatdem replied on Oct 30, 2009 at 14:37:46

“Mr. Hutchinson has done more than resist walking in lockstep with President Obama. He is consistently critical of everything Obama does. This gives him no more credibility than he would have if he walked in lockstep with Obama.”
huffingtonpost entry

For Roman Polanski

Commented Oct 28, 2009 at 02:49:02 in Entertainment

“Thank you for this thought-provoking piece, Mr Levy.

It is perhaps unfortunate that more of us are not as intellectually dispassionate as you, because your ideas are like a glimmer of hope as the Barbarians howl at the gates.

I am undecided about the Polanski issue. In a perfect world Justice is blind but we all know that idea is rubbish. We understand that this pursuit is driven by baser instincts but fail to realise that we are complicit, by thoughtlessly advocating revenge, whilst all around us Rome is burning, has been burning, and will continue to do so for the forseeable future.

But perhaps this should come as no surprise. The United States is the only advanced nation on the planet where capital punishment is still revered as an appropriate form of justice.”

BMSstudy replied on Oct 28, 2009 at 11:08:57

“You are undecide how you feel about a man who has sex with a 13 year old girl (who told him 'no' and to 'stop') that he gave booze and drugs to? Then, assuming that the judge would not go along with the 'light sentence that the DA had agreed to recomend, this man fled the country prior to sentencing.

Who is talking revenge? He has yet to be sentenced for his crime(s) and he has added to them by fleeing.”

TheBlackCat replied on Oct 28, 2009 at 09:50:47

“actually, in a barbaric society, there is no rule of law, so your argument doesn't really make sense.”

Malkin72 replied on Oct 28, 2009 at 07:34:41

“He drugged and raped a 13 year old girl in her ***??????

What is wrong with you?”

Romeover replied on Oct 28, 2009 at 06:44:06

“Sanity shows its timid head.”

GirlFriday123 replied on Oct 28, 2009 at 05:56:16

“Show me an advanced nation with a perfect justice system.

Now read the transcript of the girl's testimony, which Polanski didn't stick around long enough to dispute.

If you think people are simply being too passionate, by all means, why don't you send your 13-year-old daughter off to be drugged, raped and sodomized by him.

What is the difference between a Hollywood director who drugs and rapes a young girl and the crowd down the road who raped another young girl? Money.”

Steamboater replied on Oct 28, 2009 at 05:35:21

“Oh bullsh*t. The pursuit of Polanski isn't based on revenge but justice. You should know the difference. UYsing your rationale, let's forget about all the theieves an rapeists and other criminals because you think it's vengeful to pursue them. Let's close all the rpisions and use the house next door to you to house these criminals. I'm sure you'd be very comfrotable and safe knowing these people were free to raom around your neighborhood and near your kids if you have any. Why bother to lock up any child rapist if we give Polanski a free pass? What makes him more wrothy f freedom than othjer rapist of a 13 yr old, his fame and money?”

thrdr replied on Oct 28, 2009 at 04:43:57

“Agreed, more or less.”
huffingtonpost entry

Welcome to 2025: American Preeminence Is Disappearing Fifteen Years Early

Commented Oct 26, 2009 at 23:45:10 in Politics

“Fascinating article. Of particular note is the fact that none of the BRIC countries (except perhaps for India) are English speaking.

Revolutionary though it sounds, perhaps now is the time for Western Europe and North America (with their cultural and historical links) to begin thinking about forming a strategic (political?) alliance, along the lines of the European Union.”

Jaywalkker replied on Oct 27, 2009 at 02:13:28

“You mean aside from G7 and NATO? What more do you want? The US will never join the European Union. Besides the Christians in this country are inwardly relishing/outwardly scared of the continued globalization of America...­because it involves prophecy and one world rule coming to fruition.”

DFutureIsNow replied on Oct 27, 2009 at 01:08:56

“Although Indias official language is not english, they have the largest english speaking population in the world”
Fox News <em>Is</em> the Story

Fox News Is the Story

Commented Oct 23, 2009 at 07:14:59 in Media

“It seems to have escaped the attention of Messers Axelrod and his cadre of White House associates that the way things operate nationally is slightly different from the Chicagonian methods to which they had grown accustomed.

For history has shown that no government has even won a battle against the press.

Furthermore, one is flabbergasted that the celebrated public relations apparatus which was used against Hillary Clinton to such devastating effect just a year ago should have fallen so quickly into a state of utter decrepitude.”
huffingtonpost entry

Reagan's Lesson: "Patience" in a President's First Year Is Political Suicide

Commented Oct 22, 2009 at 14:42:32 in Politics

“Oh, the delicious irony.

"Progressives" are at last waking up to the fact that they were played like a violin during the election campaign and their feelings are hurt.

Perhaps next time, they won't be so easily seduced by meaningless campaign slogans and gimmickry.”

NCIndependant replied on Oct 22, 2009 at 15:27:52

“As opposed to the weighty substance that made up the McCain/Palin campaign?
Pull the other one.”

DocTwain replied on Oct 22, 2009 at 15:22:04

“Serious progressives were not fooled by Obama. We pay attention to policy.

It's the ordinary voter, not particularly clued in as to policy, who is confused and disappointed by the egregious systemic plutocratic corruption that persists under a Democratic presidency with Democratic supermajorities in both houses of Congress.

Less clued-in voters thought that Democrats were the opposites of Republicans. The Republicans didn't work out, so they voted for Democrats. The reality is that only Progressives are the opposite of Republicans. Centrists are essentially the same as Republicans. They believe in the supremacy of the plutocrats, rule by and for the rich, undertaxation of the capitalists, fiat by stakeholders, business as usual, and the right of the industrial cartels to dominate their policy areas, game markets, engage in opaque speculation, pay illegals below the minimum wage, and suck wealth from workers and consumers through price gouging and legalized graft. Centrists are owned by the war, banking, fossil fuel, and health insurance and pharmaceuticals cartels just as much as the Republicans, and will do their best to kill any real reform.

Democrats have total control and ownership of DC and of all outcomes of this Congress. That means that Centrists are now self-evidently the problem, not the solution. Whatever that is bad survives until 2010, is on their heads. And in their muddled way, ordinary voters will realize this.

Hence the disillusion of many Obama supporters.”

research replied on Oct 22, 2009 at 15:13:04

“We had no choice. Kucinich was the real FDR we need, but the Conservative MSM and DLC shut him out before the national debates even started.

We progressives were paying attention.

Trouble is most of the voters were fooled to accept the spoon fed candidate.

It's always been the least worst candidate.

And Obama is infinitely better than ANY GOP McCain Palin disaster.”
huffingtonpost entry

The Blair Project

Commented Oct 19, 2009 at 12:17:33 in Politics

“Space does not allow me the luxury of replying appropriately to Mr Kuttner's melodramatic statements against Tony Blair, a complex politician if ever there was one.

What I can say however, is that Robert Kuttner's all-to-simplistic attack against the former British PM is well beneath the intellectual prowess that the co-editor of a significant publication of political thought - left-wing though it may be - would normally be expected to demonstrate.

For starters, the nomenclature "President of Europe" which Mr Kuttner uses so liberally is fairly meaningless and (perhaps intentionally) misleads the readers of this publication into thinking there exists a similarity of office with the US presidency.”

FearlessFreep replied on Oct 19, 2009 at 18:15:41

“"Space does not allow me the luxury of replying appropriat­ely..." Or saying anything meaningful.”

northstar11 replied on Oct 19, 2009 at 13:03:45

“what is so complex about blair-----he is another lying politician ------good talker ,nice smile ---but underneath ---nothing new.”
Hillary Is Still the Best President That Wasn't

Hillary Is Still the Best President That Wasn't

Commented Oct 18, 2009 at 18:11:43 in Politics

“Another good piece,Mr Hutchinson.

The contrariness of the American voting population never ceases to amaze me. Yes, it was obviious that any Democratic candidate would have won the election. But it was also manifestly clear that Hillary Clinton was the better candidate, for all the reasons you stated so well.

Perhaps it is indeed true that we get the leaders we deserve.”

StopSexismNow replied on Oct 19, 2009 at 18:29:44

“Best comment I've read all day.”

JimR replied on Oct 19, 2009 at 12:07:58

“You are delusional. Are you suggesting that HIllary Clinton did NOT have huge negatives if she found herself in the general election? Wake up.”
next
1 - 25 of 135