El's Comments (70)
Movie Review: Up In The Air Soars
Commented Nov 30, 2009 at 21:09:10 in Entertainment
“I have to click somewhere else to finish this? That's annoying.”
bokiluis replied on Dec 01, 2009 at 10:53:19
“Lazy?”
Thomas Friedman -- Hasbara GrandMaster Or Elitist Dupe?
Commented Nov 30, 2009 at 18:43:12 in Politics
“I must say that I am a fan of Thomas Friedman. But I must admit, Ms. Narwani, that your points were very convincing, to say the least. Perhaps TF had a bad moment, I dunno. But perhaps he's able to take your comments to heart. I have.”
StJames replied on Dec 01, 2009 at 08:01:01
“Don't bury them too deeply in your heart...they are at least as misguided as Friedman's”
Sarah Palin, Fill Out this Map!
Commented Nov 23, 2009 at 17:06:59 in Politics
“When Dubya was in power (thank GOD that's over!!!) I used to fantasize about presenting him with a map of the middle east (while media cameras rolled, of course) and asking him to identify Iraq. I'm as sure now as I was then that he couldn't.”
hp blogger Mark Olmsted replied on Nov 23, 2009 at 17:38:55
“The sad thing is that most Americans would say "I can't find it on a map either" and somehow consider it a positive attribute. How many times did Bush show his ignorance? There is a slice of this country emotionally invested in their simplistic, black and white thinking. The complexity of modern life intimidates them, and they feel stupid, and rather than learn, the dig in. They not only don't want leaders who are smarter than they are, they want leaders they feel smarter than.”
If It Were Me, I'd Be Embarrassed
Commented Nov 23, 2009 at 02:28:31 in Media
“Well said David. You are wise beyond your years. :) Keep up the good fight.”
Schmidt Calls Palin's Memoirs "Total Fiction"
Commented Nov 14, 2009 at 19:34:21 in Politics
“Let them eat themselves and each other alive.”
roshni replied on Nov 15, 2009 at 21:52:44
“well, god did make her full of meat, so he must have meant for her to be eaten by cannibals.”
Palin's Pavlovian Response to House Health Care Passage
Commented Nov 11, 2009 at 03:43:12 in Politics
“"You wouldn't know the sanctity of life if it dropped dead in your lap." Brava Shannyn!!!”
karenann replied on Nov 11, 2009 at 11:20:41
“Exactly! Dead on (pun intended)!
And Shannyn -- you the bomb!”
And Shannyn -- you the bomb!”
Does the Symphonic Orchestra Model Work?
Commented Nov 09, 2009 at 19:42:28 in Entertainment
“I'm a classical composer. I'm about as dedicated to classical music (modern classical, preferably, but I like all periods of music) and the arts in general as one can be. I'm a decently-paid freelancer, with a solid middle-class income. I also have student loans totally six-figures.
I say all that to say that as much as I'd love to attend more concerts, unfortunately I hear about 5 or so each year. A pitiful fraction of what I would like, and, for that matter, what I used to hear when I was younger and tickets were cheaper.
I'm not trying to assess the economics involved here. That's for another, much longer post. I just want to say that, imho, ticket prices (at least in my city, Los Angeles) are prohibitively expensive. It's especially sad in the case of Los Angeles, because we'd been blessed with a music director (Esa-Pekka Salonen) very open to modern music, i.e., music that could very well appeal to an audience beyond the wealthy set.”
I say all that to say that as much as I'd love to attend more concerts, unfortunately I hear about 5 or so each year. A pitiful fraction of what I would like, and, for that matter, what I used to hear when I was younger and tickets were cheaper.
I'm not trying to assess the economics involved here. That's for another, much longer post. I just want to say that, imho, ticket prices (at least in my city, Los Angeles) are prohibitively expensive. It's especially sad in the case of Los Angeles, because we'd been blessed with a music director (Esa-Pekka Salonen) very open to modern music, i.e., music that could very well appeal to an audience beyond the wealthy set.”
For Roman Polanski
Commented Nov 02, 2009 at 11:54:25 in Entertainment
“Nice try Pete, but your response is a smarmy red herring. I'm not categorically against imprisoning rapists, and you should probably know that. When the rapist in question is no longer living in my country, thus poses no threat to me or my society, and when the crime took place decades ago, when the victim has forgiven and pleaded with others not to dredge up these painful memories, when my country's (and state's and city's) judicial resources are already overtaxed, not to mention potential misconduct on the part of the DA and the judge, I think it is rather perverse that our glory-hunting DAs insist on making this case a priority.
I repeat, too many American citizens have a very unhealthy thirst for blood and retribution. I suspect, Pete, that you would have Polanski put to death if it were up to you.
If the victim can forgive, why can't you at least take it off your list of vendettas to hungrily pursue?”
I repeat, too many American citizens have a very unhealthy thirst for blood and retribution. I suspect, Pete, that you would have Polanski put to death if it were up to you.
If the victim can forgive, why can't you at least take it off your list of vendettas to hungrily pursue?”
benrod1 replied on Nov 03, 2009 at 06:52:13
“So if a criminal can run away and stay away for a long period of time then his crime is forgiven? Where is the justice in that? It is natural for a victim to forgive after a period of time, and may actually be a necessary part of healing, but that does not mean that the crime itself should not go unpunished. The interests of the people and the courts still must be addressed. And to say to any criminal that running away and staying away from our country's laws earns you in effect a pardon for your crimes perverts the cause of justice and turns it instead into a cat and mouse game where those criminals who have the money and means to escape justice win and society loses.”
For Roman Polanski
Commented Oct 27, 2009 at 21:03:15 in Entertainment
“Wow, at least one voice of reason among the bloodthirsty hounds. America, you are a cruel country, always hungry, no, insatiable when it comes to the taste of punishment.”
petegrif replied on Oct 30, 2009 at 00:57:17
“totally agree
what on earth is wrong with people in the US who want to put child rapists in prison?”
what on earth is wrong with people in the US who want to put child rapists in prison?”
fabucat replied on Oct 28, 2009 at 11:14:19
“Except for Bush and Cheney. We're perfectly willing to forgive and forget them!”
PavePusher replied on Oct 27, 2009 at 22:02:40
“Would you be willing to let That Animal care for your children, unwatched?”
How Lieberman Stole Reid's Candy and Drank Snowe's Milkshake
Commented Oct 27, 2009 at 20:55:27 in Politics
“Good article M.S.! As for your response, above, I agree with you on Feingold. Russ is absolutely the real deal. My favorite member of Congress, hands down.
It remains a conundrum as to what to do with Judas Lieberman: bribe or punish. I think it was an admirable impulse/attempt on the part of Obama to make nice with Lieberman the first time, if somewhat naive. But Lieberman is clearly only about Lieberman and placation and reward have clearly bore no fruit. So, even if it's a bit too late, I think it is time to cast him overboard. Sadly, Lieberman is a cancer on the American political system.”
It remains a conundrum as to what to do with Judas Lieberman: bribe or punish. I think it was an admirable impulse/attempt on the part of Obama to make nice with Lieberman the first time, if somewhat naive. But Lieberman is clearly only about Lieberman and placation and reward have clearly bore no fruit. So, even if it's a bit too late, I think it is time to cast him overboard. Sadly, Lieberman is a cancer on the American political system.”
BLBass replied on Oct 27, 2009 at 21:06:09
“No conundrum at all. Bribe first, get the bill passed, then punish. And punish harshly, in recompense for letting him get away in '06.”
An Open Letter from Meg Whitman About Voting
Commented Oct 06, 2009 at 13:51:09 in Politics
“Wow, that comment was truly laughable. Not to mention completely inappropriate to Mr. Kelly's post. At least you, alex61, have oodles of realism, patience, maturity and, last but not least, standards.”
PartyPartyParty replied on Oct 06, 2009 at 14:17:19
“So you can't give any examples of how the country has been on a liberal bent either, can you?”
alex61 replied on Oct 06, 2009 at 13:59:51
“Thank you. You are very gracious.”
Rage, Repulsion, Response, Roman
Commented Oct 01, 2009 at 03:52:17 in Entertainment
“As someone who constitutes "The People of California," I must say that you, limber, don't speak for me. If there is indeed a price to be paid for "civilized existence in California," I'd rather it not be exacted in the pertinent resources (time, money, legal personnel, prisons, etc.) in a case that is legally murky (in terms of the judge's and DA's behavior) and, more importantly, already resolved in the heart of the victim.
Your use of the term "civilized" strikes me as somewhat incorrect, even falsely magnanimous. It is an UNcivilized society that seeks so-called "justice" merely for justice's sake, and metes out a penalty that may be unfitting for the crime. So-called "civilized" society also distinguishes itself, and cherishes, the ability to *forgive*.
It is a strawman argument being used by the hang-em-high side of the Polanski case, namely that the other side wants Polanski off the hook because he's famous and/or talented, etc. Speaking only for myself at least, this is not the case. But I have to believe that there are quite a lot of mitigating factors: the above-mentioned questions involving judge/DA, but also the time that has passed, not to mention Polanski's previous vicimizations himself, namely the Holocaust and his wife's brutal butchering at the hands of the Manson family. These don't give him an automatic free pass, but they should allow us to wonder if this is the best way to use our law-enforcement resources.”
Your use of the term "civilized" strikes me as somewhat incorrect, even falsely magnanimous. It is an UNcivilized society that seeks so-called "justice" merely for justice's sake, and metes out a penalty that may be unfitting for the crime. So-called "civilized" society also distinguishes itself, and cherishes, the ability to *forgive*.
It is a strawman argument being used by the hang-em-high side of the Polanski case, namely that the other side wants Polanski off the hook because he's famous and/or talented, etc. Speaking only for myself at least, this is not the case. But I have to believe that there are quite a lot of mitigating factors: the above-mentioned questions involving judge/DA, but also the time that has passed, not to mention Polanski's previous vicimizations himself, namely the Holocaust and his wife's brutal butchering at the hands of the Manson family. These don't give him an automatic free pass, but they should allow us to wonder if this is the best way to use our law-enforcement resources.”
MAH999 replied on Oct 01, 2009 at 18:10:52
“So, if someone is up for rape and can show that they have been victimized by life, seen horrific things, that this becomes the go-to defense? I expect you mean that for that big black guy raised in SoLA, empoverished, poorly educated, watching people around him succumb to drugs, shot down in gang violence ... growing up with that as a daily experience ... it wouldn't be worthwhile to use our law-enforcement resources to bring such a person to justice if he should drug and rape a 13 year old?
Polanski did the crime. He skipped. Anyone else who skipped would be hunted down. He could have made this go away a long time ago instead of continuing to victimize his victim. He can afford much better lawyers than the poor guy from SoLA. Seems like a lot of boo-hoo-hooing for a guy who doesn't need or deserve it. Let him go back and deal with the system just the way anyone else would. I'll save my sympathy for the innocent guy who got executed because the Supremes wouldn't intervene.”
Polanski did the crime. He skipped. Anyone else who skipped would be hunted down. He could have made this go away a long time ago instead of continuing to victimize his victim. He can afford much better lawyers than the poor guy from SoLA. Seems like a lot of boo-hoo-hooing for a guy who doesn't need or deserve it. Let him go back and deal with the system just the way anyone else would. I'll save my sympathy for the innocent guy who got executed because the Supremes wouldn't intervene.”
limber replied on Oct 01, 2009 at 12:46:31
“Forgive? You think that the State should just forgive someone because he fled the country and evaded punishment for the rape of a 13 year old? That's bizarre. It also sets up one hell of a double-standard: if you do the crime, you must do the time, unless of course you have enough money to flee to another country and wait it out in a chalet in Gstaad.
This is not just a case for Polanski, this sets precedent and signals how justice in California operates. The man admitted to raping a 13 year old. For the sake of the rule of law, he has to get the flipside of that equation and be sentenced for his crime.
The victim, poor woman, has been raked over the media coals annually. This is Roman Polanski's fault, what with him being the fugitive. Of course she wants the case dropped, but that's not how the system works. You don't get the make your victim's life so abstractly awful that she finally says "FINE! Let him go, leave it! Just stop talking about it!"
The mitigating factors are for the justice system to work out -- and the justice system doesn't swing into action until Roman Polanski is standing in front of a judge, as he was meant to do three decades ago.”
This is not just a case for Polanski, this sets precedent and signals how justice in California operates. The man admitted to raping a 13 year old. For the sake of the rule of law, he has to get the flipside of that equation and be sentenced for his crime.
The victim, poor woman, has been raked over the media coals annually. This is Roman Polanski's fault, what with him being the fugitive. Of course she wants the case dropped, but that's not how the system works. You don't get the make your victim's life so abstractly awful that she finally says "FINE! Let him go, leave it! Just stop talking about it!"
The mitigating factors are for the justice system to work out -- and the justice system doesn't swing into action until Roman Polanski is standing in front of a judge, as he was meant to do three decades ago.”
VIDEO: Palin's "Lifted" Speech
Commented Jun 07, 2009 at 17:39:49 in Politics
“Nails on blackboard.”
davidray replied on Jun 07, 2009 at 19:00:28
“How many macaca moments is this woman going to get before "she blows up real good." That's an old sctv reference. :-)))”
I Know What to Do About Kim Jong Il.
Commented May 28, 2009 at 04:33:41 in Politics
“At the very least, this is certainly no worse than any other plan put forward so far. Brava Ms. Markoe!”
The Weird Contradictions of the Tea Bag Revolution
Commented Mar 18, 2009 at 21:52:57 in Politics
“Bob wrote:
"Here's the problem.
The Boston Tea Party was ultimately precipitated by a massive corporate tax cut."
Actually Bob, here's the problem: that you believe that you can reason with these teabaggers (heh heh). The problem is that you think that facts, or logic, or reason, let alone compassion or kindness, has any place in this discourse.
And thanks for the great remarks about Glen Beck. Punch-me face indeed!”
"Here's the problem.
The Boston Tea Party was ultimately precipitated by a massive corporate tax cut."
Actually Bob, here's the problem: that you believe that you can reason with these teabaggers (heh heh). The problem is that you think that facts, or logic, or reason, let alone compassion or kindness, has any place in this discourse.
And thanks for the great remarks about Glen Beck. Punch-me face indeed!”
Bring Back the Counter Culture
Commented Feb 23, 2009 at 20:21:43 in Politics
“You say bring back counter culture. Bringing back *culture* would be a good start.”
Hugh Mistake: Oscars and All That Schmaltz
Commented Feb 23, 2009 at 17:09:50 in Entertainment
“Mr. Chattman wrote: "Still, there's no question this year's Oscars were a dud."
I think there's at least a question. I, for one, strongly disagree. I think this year's Oscars were quite good. I also happen to think that some of your ideas for change, Mr. Chattman, are bad ideas.
More importantly however (and still, relatively unimportant to what is going on in this world, lest I appear all haughty!), every year there are these bloviating reviews that curse and condemn the Oscars. And every year it makes me want to scream: if you don't like the awards show (or tv program, film, concert, etc.), just turn the damn channel or turn of your set altogether.”
I think there's at least a question. I, for one, strongly disagree. I think this year's Oscars were quite good. I also happen to think that some of your ideas for change, Mr. Chattman, are bad ideas.
More importantly however (and still, relatively unimportant to what is going on in this world, lest I appear all haughty!), every year there are these bloviating reviews that curse and condemn the Oscars. And every year it makes me want to scream: if you don't like the awards show (or tv program, film, concert, etc.), just turn the damn channel or turn of your set altogether.”
hp blogger Jon Chattman replied on Feb 23, 2009 at 20:11:29
“I did really enjoy the speeches as I noted. And sorry, I'm a movie lover - I can't change the channel.”
Nostical replied on Feb 23, 2009 at 17:32:51
“It's never as interesting to shower praise.
I also think this was the best telecast of the Oscars.
Improvements I'd suggest :
1.Fewer montages and more clips of the actors in their roles. Many of us have not seen the movies nominated.
2. If you do the IN MEMORIAM, don't dance the camera in and out. Some of the names and faces were more visible than others.
3.It almost seemed like last year's winners (Tilda Swinton, Alan Arkin, Javier Bardem, and Marion Cottilet) were not big enough stars to present the big awards themselves and ergo the pantheon of past winners to praise the nominees. I liked it., but it would be hard to keep repeating. This year's winners (Penelope Cruz, the late Heath Ledger, Kate Winslet and Sean Penn) won't require such a gimmick.
4. Keep Hugh Jackman”
I also think this was the best telecast of the Oscars.
Improvements I'd suggest :
1.Fewer montages and more clips of the actors in their roles. Many of us have not seen the movies nominated.
2. If you do the IN MEMORIAM, don't dance the camera in and out. Some of the names and faces were more visible than others.
3.It almost seemed like last year's winners (Tilda Swinton, Alan Arkin, Javier Bardem, and Marion Cottilet) were not big enough stars to present the big awards themselves and ergo the pantheon of past winners to praise the nominees. I liked it., but it would be hard to keep repeating. This year's winners (Penelope Cruz, the late Heath Ledger, Kate Winslet and Sean Penn) won't require such a gimmick.
4. Keep Hugh Jackman”
milo h minderbinder replied on Feb 23, 2009 at 17:19:38
“Some of us generally like the show and want to find out who wins, and want to hear the acceptance speeches.
Sure, there are a few people who flat out hate it every year. But it's silly to assume that anyone who criticizes a given year falls into that category.”
Sure, there are a few people who flat out hate it every year. But it's silly to assume that anyone who criticizes a given year falls into that category.”
New York in Shock While LA Rocks!
Commented Feb 21, 2009 at 20:09:22 in Entertainment
“First of all, people in LA are panicking.
Second of all, while I may not be too pessimistic about the film business, the fact that WB and DW are rolling out: "... The Watchmen, Harry Potter and Terminator. ... GI Joe and Transformers" is hardly reassuring, imo. I think those movies will have good, but not great, BO showings.”
Second of all, while I may not be too pessimistic about the film business, the fact that WB and DW are rolling out: "... The Watchmen, Harry Potter and Terminator. ... GI Joe and Transformers" is hardly reassuring, imo. I think those movies will have good, but not great, BO showings.”
Isis N replied on Feb 21, 2009 at 21:51:36
“Believe me, even in areas that are infamous for having stuff filmed, there's a whole LOT of people in the industry already scared since they're not getting as many jobs as they used to.
On top of that, people can't afford to go to movies - especially the teenagers that most movies seem to be aimed at. I'm willing to bet that the box offices won't do that well for any of the aforementioned movies (as in not even close to "good" box office showings), because the teens they're advertising to will just go on the internet instead and watch the movies online for free.”
On top of that, people can't afford to go to movies - especially the teenagers that most movies seem to be aimed at. I'm willing to bet that the box offices won't do that well for any of the aforementioned movies (as in not even close to "good" box office showings), because the teens they're advertising to will just go on the internet instead and watch the movies online for free.”
President Obama Is Driving Republicans Insane
Commented Feb 11, 2009 at 20:25:27 in Politics
“Since he left office? They hardly uttered his name in the last 2 years.”
Enough with the "First Hundred Days"
Commented Feb 07, 2009 at 20:51:05 in Politics
“Alec, you are 100% correct! I especially agree with your sentiments re. Geithner.”
CNBC's Clueless Mark Haines Calls Me "Clueless" on Morning Joe: I Respond
Commented Feb 04, 2009 at 17:43:15 in Business
“The party's over for the bankers and, liked animals backed into a corner, they're going to bite, hiss, scream and lash out in any way they can to preserve themselves.”
cbloch replied on Feb 04, 2009 at 18:06:02
“you forgot urinate and defecate”
God Damn Wall Street!
Commented Feb 02, 2009 at 02:05:48 in Business
“My post doesn't prove either of your points, but thanks for giving it so much significance and power.
To be fair, however, I didn't mean to only cite Catholicism, or even Christianity. While there are lots of good deeds done by various churches and religions, I still maintain that religion does way more harm than it does good. If you disagree, well, then you disagree.
Still, from what I've read, which is quite a lot, more people have been killed in the name of god than from any other cause. I guess you "liberal Christians" might wish it weren't so, and I respect you for trying to do good deeds in the name of what you believe. But I still maintain that more harm is done than good, not to mention more division, hate, etc.
And while you can be all sanctimonious about some church in some particular locale, I defy you to refute my comment about the perverse wealth of St. Peters and the RC Church.”
To be fair, however, I didn't mean to only cite Catholicism, or even Christianity. While there are lots of good deeds done by various churches and religions, I still maintain that religion does way more harm than it does good. If you disagree, well, then you disagree.
Still, from what I've read, which is quite a lot, more people have been killed in the name of god than from any other cause. I guess you "liberal Christians" might wish it weren't so, and I respect you for trying to do good deeds in the name of what you believe. But I still maintain that more harm is done than good, not to mention more division, hate, etc.
And while you can be all sanctimonious about some church in some particular locale, I defy you to refute my comment about the perverse wealth of St. Peters and the RC Church.”
alphonsegaston replied on Feb 02, 2009 at 03:01:36
“Why should I want to refute your comment? I have no stake in the behavior of the Catholic Church. I was not trying to be "all sanctimonious" when mentioning First Baptist in Providence. Rather, I meant to parallel it to the overdecoration of St. Peters. I guess you don't know about the building and the history it shares with Roger Williams. I assumed you were an American. Anyway, Google the church and read its history, although that alone will not make my point. You have to see the place.
Of course much harm has been done by religion as in any human activity. But I personally, having read quite a lot myself, think most violence etc. is caused by just plain old greed for power. No matter what rationale humans have used for their bad behavior, it mostly comes down to desire for power in some form or other
And, for your information, I truly am a liberal Christian, not a "liberal Christian."”
Of course much harm has been done by religion as in any human activity. But I personally, having read quite a lot myself, think most violence etc. is caused by just plain old greed for power. No matter what rationale humans have used for their bad behavior, it mostly comes down to desire for power in some form or other
And, for your information, I truly am a liberal Christian, not a "liberal Christian."”
Review of Springsteen's Super Bowl Halftime Show!
Commented Feb 02, 2009 at 01:57:02 in Entertainment
“I couldn't agree more. This was really bad bruce, and the recent press about his walmart deal makes me wonder how much of the good bruce there really was.”
JimR replied on Feb 02, 2009 at 12:07:31
“Oh my, the melodrama...”
writeaway replied on Feb 02, 2009 at 10:03:20
“Two of the best music DVDs I have are Walmart deals, the Eagles and Keith Urban. At ten or twelve dollars, you can't beat it.”
God Damn Wall Street!
Commented Feb 01, 2009 at 18:40:53 in Business
“Did you ever go to St. Peter's/Sistene Chappel in Rome? I've never seen such conspicuous excess in my life. How many hungry people could be fed, how many homeless given shelter if the RC Church were to divest themselves of even a fraction of their material holdings?
Mr. Raushenbush, while I share your sentiments on Wall Street greed, and I'll even believe that you, personally, may very well be a selfless individual, I am not at all impressed or convinced by the Church's deeds either.
I have some vague recollection of some long-haired dude having something to say about glass houses...”
Mr. Raushenbush, while I share your sentiments on Wall Street greed, and I'll even believe that you, personally, may very well be a selfless individual, I am not at all impressed or convinced by the Church's deeds either.
I have some vague recollection of some long-haired dude having something to say about glass houses...”
alphonsegaston replied on Feb 02, 2009 at 01:13:36
“The Roman Catholic Church is not the same as all Christianity. Why not visit First Baptist Church in Providence RI? Just as we liberal Christians are not pleased to be lumped with the religious right, so too are Protestants tired of being lumped with Catholics. Of course, in the news media, Christianity means either the Catholic church when it is a question of religious holidays and such, or the religious right when it involves social issues. Most churches where I have been active have been hard pressed to pay the pastors and keep up the church furnace.”
Zanti replied on Feb 01, 2009 at 23:25:56
“Thanks for proving my (and alphonsegaston's) point.”


