Graywolf48's Comments (75)
Year of the Rahm: Get 'Em, Then Gut 'Em
Commented Dec 19, 2009 at 19:05:19 in Politics
“You can clearly judge a man by looking at those with whom he surrounds himself. The overtures and pandering to Lieberman, Snowe, Nelson, Stupak, keeping his staff and cabinet filled with Bush/Clinton cronies and a foul mouthed, duplicitous hack like Emanuel as chief of staff. Encouraging Rahm's Blue Dogs and right of center DINO's and telling the progressive base to shut up and sit down should have given every liberal pause. When Obama took office, he did not recruit or bring with him the nation's best and brightest to provide new ideas and fresh leadership. What we've gotten instead hope for "change we can believe in" is business as usual.”
Year of the Rahm: Get 'Em, Then Gut 'Em
Commented Dec 19, 2009 at 18:55:37 in Politics
“Yes, I think I am.”
Why We Lost Healthcare
Commented Dec 15, 2009 at 23:39:30 in Politics
“You are correct. You can also judge a man by the company he keeps and Obama does not keep very good company. This President punked a nation and I don't think the "progressive base" will be fooled again.”
America Without a Middle Class
Commented Dec 02, 2009 at 21:54:21 in Business
“History has shown where societies become two tiered, a small but very rich upper class or aristocracy and a very poor lower class, violent social revolution transpires. It has been the middle class that has provided not just a buffer, but a path for upward mobility in this country. When we become a nation of nothing more than a large mass of "have nots" and a small group of "have mores" revolution will most assuredly result. The destruction of the middle class will have very dire consequences for our nation. We ignore the lessons of history at our own peril.”
Tiredoldliberal replied on Dec 02, 2009 at 21:59:08
“No, you don't get revolution. First you get plutocracy. As the wealth diminishes, the elites fight amongst themselves until one recruits the masses and seizes dictatorial power. Then, if the dictator is too brutal or too incompetent, you eventually get revolution, which usually is followed by a military dictatorship. Eventually, when the society is ground down enough, or a foreign benefactor intervenes, you get democracy - for a little while, until the elites start grabbing wealth and power again.”
More Palin Lies: The Trooper in 'Troopergate' Breaks His Silence
Commented Nov 26, 2009 at 10:28:02 in Politics
“I don't really think it matters much what "truths" are revealed by Wooten, Levi Johnston, or host of others about Palin. Those who support Palin are "true believers", fanatics, and no facts will alter their belief that Sarah is "just like us, a patriot and family values conservati ve." She wraps herself in the American flag and brandishes her Christian cross of righteousness. That makes Palin and her followers very dangerous people, very, very dangerous.”
Clarabell replied on Nov 26, 2009 at 11:22:27
“and history might even be able to record the truth, now won't that be sad?”
decrepittex replied on Nov 26, 2009 at 11:16:31
“I'd say you nailed it Graywolf. I'd give you a ten!”
PaganCanuck replied on Nov 26, 2009 at 10:53:32
“Many people write off her ilk as wing-nuts, but I think it's a dangerous idea to consider them irrelevant. They are getting louder, and organizing into larger groups. Isn't there a *national* teabag convention coming up now?
This is not a group to be ignored.”
This is not a group to be ignored.”
EmmaJ76 replied on Nov 26, 2009 at 10:49:07
“Graywolf48 , sad but very true.”
The Great Atomic Film Cover-Up
Commented Nov 11, 2009 at 23:47:25 in Media
“Women and children carried bombs and grenades that killed American troops in Vietnam. Women, children and old men were being trained to oppose an American invasion with sticks and stones. The Japanese would have fought to the last man, woman and child standing, like they did on Tarawa and other islands. On Okinawa, women and children threw themselves into the sea rather than surrender.”
Jake Gittes replied on Nov 12, 2009 at 01:27:25
“Do you really think you can compare the war in the Pacific with Vietnam?
And how many women & children in Okinawa killed themselves rather than surrender?
What percentage of the population?
And why, for "honor" or out of fear of what would happen to them when they were captured?”
And how many women & children in Okinawa killed themselves rather than surrender?
What percentage of the population?
And why, for "honor" or out of fear of what would happen to them when they were captured?”
The Great Atomic Film Cover-Up
Commented Nov 11, 2009 at 23:43:04 in Media
“I saw the film, several times. I still would have used both bombs. I'm glad America is the only nation to have ever used those weapons and hope as a result no nation ever uses them again. Close to 50 million civilians died as a result of WWII, most as a result of the Axis. The Chinese and most Pacific Islanders suffered horribly at the hands of the Japanese. The Russian death rate was incredible. Unfortunately, in war civilians suffer and die. The use of nuclear weapons in the future would probably result in the end of life on earth as we know it. I'd like to see a world free of such horrors, but I doubt I ever will.”
Jake Gittes replied on Nov 12, 2009 at 01:22:05
“"In war civilians suffer and die."
Everyone knows that, so why did the government suppress this for so long?”
Everyone knows that, so why did the government suppress this for so long?”
The Great Atomic Film Cover-Up
Commented Nov 11, 2009 at 23:34:16 in Media
“Those bombs not only saved a million or more US military lives, they probably saved 10 million or more Japanese lives. Even after the dropping of the second bomb the Japanese did not rush to surrender and their military tried to prevent capitulation in a last minute military coup. I think Truman made the right decision. What's more, if the Germans or the Japanese had built the bomb first, they would have not hesitated one moment in using them.”
Jake Gittes replied on Nov 12, 2009 at 01:19:35
“What other war criminals would you recommend we emulate?”
Marine Commandant Defies White House on Gay Troops
Commented Nov 02, 2009 at 17:36:14 in Politics
“Then fire him. Marines are taught to follow orders, not to question. The Commandant is obviously incapable for personal or other reasons to follow the directions and desires of his CinC. If a subordinate actively questioned or opposed the Commandant, they would be history. Obama has to stand up to this Pentagon, or they will destroy him. Fire the Commandant, now.”
Douglas90723 replied on Nov 02, 2009 at 17:44:26
“If he was a man he would follow orders. What a poor example of military leadership.”
AP Asks If Obama Is "Obnoxiously Articulate"
Commented Oct 15, 2009 at 17:57:00 in Media
“Well, I don't know if Mr. Obama is really "obnoxiously articulate" but I do know the media is not very journalistic and is definitely insufficiently obsequious.”
Idea1013 replied on Oct 15, 2009 at 18:32:16
“Ooh obsequious- excellent choice : ) (Liz Sidoti scrambles for her dictionary)”
AP Asks If Obama Is "Obnoxiously Articulate"
Commented Oct 15, 2009 at 17:55:10 in Media
“Well, at least he can read, which is more than I can ever say for Bush. Even St. Reagan screwed up without his little 3x5 cards and Nancy whispering in his ear. Really, is that the best you can come up with after 8 years of a man who struggled with reading "My Pet Goat"?”
Memo to Pentagon: Can We Talk About "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" or Not?
Commented Oct 08, 2009 at 19:30:06 in Politics
“She was disciplined because the USAF Academy is controlled by the evangelical christian church. Read or rent the documentary "Constantine's Sword". It is disgraceful what is going on in our military today as a mercenary force. I would love to see the draft brought back so the military has real citizen-soldiers who might just keep a lot of these things from happening. In addition, our Presidents might not be so ready to go to war based on lies and distortions if everyone's child was at risk, not just those who for one reason or another (usually economic) volunteer.”
Gay Rights Speech: What Should Obama Say Tonight?
Commented Oct 07, 2009 at 21:39:44 in Politics
“I voted for Obama. I worked for Obama in an area of Appalachia where being an Obama supporter was not looked on very favorably by my neighbors. I am not "mocking" his speaking ability. I actually enjoy listening to someone who can construct and deliver a cogent sentence. What I am saying is, Obama is a lot of talk and very little action. Or as the cliche goes, "he can talk the talk but does not walk the walk." I want fewer speeches and more leadership. Even Reid is begging him for leadership on DADT, and what do we get from the President? Crickets. MLK and JFK and LBJ and HST and FDR actually led on issues, many of those issues were more unpopular than repealing DADT. So far all BHO has done is talk, talk, talk.But then, he has his equal rights, so there's no hurry.”
Gay Rights Speech: What Should Obama Say Tonight?
Commented Oct 07, 2009 at 19:41:58 in Politics
“Encouraging words and charming platitudes are no challenge for this President. He excels at public speaking. It is in leadership and taking action that he is an abject failure.”
TheDarkKnight replied on Oct 07, 2009 at 20:19:22
“I voted for Obama in spite of his policies, which I have rarely agreed with, simply because I believed that he was a good and decent man. But, wow, get him in there and... watch nothing happen at all. Just like a firecracker that doesn't go off.”
Gretel1or2 replied on Oct 07, 2009 at 19:53:26
“A lot of posters here (including you) have resorted to mocking our President for his speaking skills, but it would behoove you to note that the majority of civil rights leaders (e.g., Martin Luther King), and Presidents who made their mark, were able to do so mostly because of their great speaking ability. When one speaks well, one is able to convince others to view things from the perspective that one wants. When others view things from the perspective that one wants, they are more inclined to support the actions that one wants to take. When they support the action that one wants to take, then one can more easily engage in that particular action. This is how change comes about. Make no mistake about that.”
The Truth About Jobs That No One Wants to Tell You
Commented Oct 02, 2009 at 21:41:41 in Business
“Yes, we can do all of those things. I shop locally, my eggs come from a nearby farm from free range chickens. I can buy a half or quarter of a cow at my local butcher shop. I shop the local Farmer's market (love the fresh locally made cheese) and bake my own bread. During the summer I grow many of my own vegetables. I have 3 rain barrels. I haven't started composting yet, but plan to. I buy in bulk whenever possible and freeze meat/poultry bought on sale. Friends and neighbors do home canning, I've not tried it yet. The thing is, most people cannot or will not do these things. We are a "fast food" instant fix nation. Much of what you suggest requires a lot of effort. I personally would like to go solar and buy a wind turbine, but they are way beyond my means financially. I live (well I think) on Social Security and nothing more.”
The Truth About Jobs That No One Wants to Tell You
Commented Oct 02, 2009 at 18:35:24 in Business
“And your degree in economics is from where?”
The Truth About Jobs That No One Wants to Tell You
Commented Oct 02, 2009 at 18:33:51 in Business
“Some of what you say has validity. But then you just get silly. America does not have the population it had in the colonial days or the 1800's. Living off the land for the vast majority of Americans is just not feasible. I live on a rural acre and do not have enough land to support "critters" beyond some chickens. Cows and goats and pigs need more than a few feet to thrive and survive. Do you have any idea how much it costs to raise just one cow? I have several friend who farm cattle and they barely make a living or break even in some years. I can grow a fair assortment of vegetables but I could not see living off the land year round, our winters are very cold and snowy. You need to do a little research.”
DonRoberto replied on Oct 02, 2009 at 19:08:24
“You're right, we can't all become little independent survivalists, but we *can* lessen the personal impact of economic disruptions by growing vegetables, replacing lawn watering with rainwater, buying goods in bulk when they are affordable, negotiating neighborhood grocery prices thru a coop, trading services with others thru a barter exchange, etc.
The object again is *not* self-sufficiency; it is lessening the impact of economic downturns or disruptions on your personal finances.”
The object again is *not* self-sufficiency; it is lessening the impact of economic downturns or disruptions on your personal finances.”
The Truth About Jobs That No One Wants to Tell You
Commented Oct 02, 2009 at 18:19:54 in Business
“There was no money in the pot during the Reagan years when he cut taxes for the rich and the corporations and ran up huge deficits. The Money left in the pot by Clinton was squandered by Bush and the GOP on even more tax cuts for the wealthy and even more deficit spending. All during those years, I bet you didn't make a peep or even subscribed to the GOP mantra that "deficits don't matter." The country is in trouble. Those super-rich who benefited from all the big tax cuts now have to ante up and pay. The money tree is right where it has been for awhile now, in China and Japan and Europe. The government has to spend now, but spend wisely. Put people to work rebuilding our infrastructure, roads, power grids, bridges, sewer and water lines. When people work and make a decent wage, they buy things and that means merchants have to replenish shelves and...well you get the picture. Don't waste any more money on tax cuts for the wealthy or shoveling money into banks who use it to create nothing but worthless paper documents. Wise up, huh?”
Dr Mark Hyman Discusses Why Cholesterol May Not Be The Cause Of Heart Disease With MSNBC's Dr Nancy (VIDEO)
Commented Sep 23, 2009 at 12:01:29 in Living
“Personal, at one time all my numbers were horrible. I tried all the doctors prescribed, including the low fat diet. I actually gained weight and my numbers got no better. In desperation and against medical advice I went on the Atkins diet. My weight dropped off quickly, I felt better and when the doctors saw my labs, they repeated them because they were sure there was an error. I also felt great and had more energy than ever. The problem is, I couldn't stay on the Atkins because it can be boring and expensive. I love carbs, I'm actually addicted to carbs. Bread, pasta, cake, chocolate, ice cream, trying to avoid carbs while dining out is almost impossible. I'm now trying to get back on the Atkins since off it I've ballooned and gained over 50 pounds. I think the real culprit is sugar. In America we consume tons of sugar and tons of salt. It's everywhere and in everything. I'm sure if I can break the sugar/salt addiction, my weight would drop and my health would improve. But finding food with low salt and no sugar is very hard and very, very expensive.”
irisisland replied on Sep 23, 2009 at 13:58:23
“Read everything you can from this site http://www .westonapr ice.org/ and follow the recommendations on food and diet...you will not regret it. The research is science based with excellent references. The organization is comprised of professional volunteers (scientist, doctors, nutritionists), and functions on membership dues and donations. I've been a member for 8 years or so and is the best organization I've ever joined.
We have found that by consuming nutritionally dense foods (including plenty of satiating, saturated fats), the sugar/carb cravings are gone. My husband used to be a coffee and cookie addict...n o more; he has no desire for sugars of any kind, nor coffee. He's 51, slim and trim, looks at least 10 years younger, b/p of 115/70. I don't look too shabby myself, also 51, slim, still fertile, b/p of 100/60. Both our blood lipid values are perfect (mine used to be too low and I suffered frequent respiratory infections ...now one mild cold per year!). And, no more low blood sugar attacks nor frequent eating.
No slippery slope to old age in our home...we just keep getting better.
Another site you may enjoy: http://www .breadandm oney.com/
To your health!”
We have found that by consuming nutritionally dense foods (including plenty of satiating, saturated fats), the sugar/carb cravings are gone. My husband used to be a coffee and cookie addict...n
No slippery slope to old age in our home...we just keep getting better.
Another site you may enjoy: http://www
To your health!”
Whatevah replied on Sep 23, 2009 at 13:47:24
“I've come to love cooking. Buy "Food for life" and learn some of the recipes. It tastes fabulous, it's good for you, it's cheaper, and it's fun.”
Barack Obama Must See Michael Moore's New Movie (and So Must You)!
Commented Sep 21, 2009 at 16:31:02 in Business
“FDR's "Second Bill of Rights" has been around since January 11, 1944 when he addressed it in his State of the Union speech. Because of illness, the speech was given by radio. It was not one of his better speeches and was not as memorable as some of his other speeches, but because of its content, it was one of the most important speeches ever given. Because of space constraints, I'll summarize FDR's Second Bill of Rights:
The right to a useful and remunerative job.
The right to earn enough to provide adequate food, clothing and recreation.
The right of farmer's to raise and sell his products at a return that will provide a decent living.
The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade free of unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad.
The right of every family to a decent home.
The right to ADEQUATE MEDICAL CARE to achieve and enjoy good health.
The right to adequate protection from economic fears of old age, sickness, accident and unemployment.
The right to a good education.
In essence, everything the Republicans opposed then and continue to oppose now.”
The right to a useful and remunerative job.
The right to earn enough to provide adequate food, clothing and recreation.
The right of farmer's to raise and sell his products at a return that will provide a decent living.
The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade free of unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad.
The right of every family to a decent home.
The right to ADEQUATE MEDICAL CARE to achieve and enjoy good health.
The right to adequate protection from economic fears of old age, sickness, accident and unemployment.
The right to a good education.
In essence, everything the Republicans opposed then and continue to oppose now.”
Barack Obama Must See Michael Moore's New Movie (and So Must You)!
Commented Sep 21, 2009 at 16:14:55 in Business
“Rupert Murdoch is anything but a communist. A fascist or maybe even a national socialist to some extent, or even an oligarch, but definitely not a communist or even a socialist. Murdoch is a greedy capitalist for whom having everything is not even enough.”
New Rule: You Can't Complain About Health Care Reform If You're Not Willing to Reform Your Own Health
Commented Sep 18, 2009 at 17:17:18 in Comedy
“Damn you to hell, Maher! Once again you nailed it. You are absolutely correct.”
Remembering Henry Gibson
Commented Sep 18, 2009 at 17:11:01 in Entertainment
“"In a time of bad prose, Henry Gibson was a poem." I think that sums up Mr. Gibson quite nicely. What more can one say?”
Broken Politics
Commented Sep 15, 2009 at 10:03:34 in Politics
“South Carolina has always been a hotbed of secession and that hasn't changed much since the end of the Civil War. During the Revolution, SC threatened to fight for King George if the anti-slavery clause was not removed from the Constitution. The majority of colonies opposed slavery, but in an attempt to keep the colonies united in the Revolution, they "compromised" on slavery. SC passed the first "nullification laws" designed to thwart Federal taxing authority. It was a SC Congressman that physically whipped (caned) a Boston Senator on the floor of Congress. SC was the first state to secede from the Union. The first shots of the Civil War were fired there. The confederate flag still flies above the statehouse in SC. The KKK is still active there. Just look at the politicians they have sent to Washington over the years and remember Joe Wilson is a disciple of Strom Thurmond. Boycott SC? I think SC has been trying to boycott the US since the 1850's.”
SCboy replied on Sep 15, 2009 at 12:00:01
“Don't disagree with your general point but just a couple clarifications, please.
The American Revolution officially ended in 1783 with the Treaty of Paris. The fighting had actually stopped in 1781 after the Battle of Yorktown. The US Constitution was ratified in 1787. I don't see how language in the Constitution could have been affected by events of the Revolution when it ended six years before the Constitution was written.
The Confederate flag does not fly above the SC statehouse. It was removed ten years ago and was placed on the grounds in a memorial to Confederate soldiers. Yes, it is still there but does not fly above the statehouse. This misinformation is repeated constantly.”
The American Revolution officially ended in 1783 with the Treaty of Paris. The fighting had actually stopped in 1781 after the Battle of Yorktown. The US Constitution was ratified in 1787. I don't see how language in the Constitution could have been affected by events of the Revolution when it ended six years before the Constitution was written.
The Confederate flag does not fly above the SC statehouse. It was removed ten years ago and was placed on the grounds in a memorial to Confederate soldiers. Yes, it is still there but does not fly above the statehouse. This misinformation is repeated constantly.”
TobyB replied on Sep 15, 2009 at 10:17:06
“I'll by my firecrackers in Tennessee thank you.”
Broken Politics
Commented Sep 15, 2009 at 09:11:16 in Politics
“Yes, it really does seem that any more in America the tail is wagging the dog. When the vast majority of doctors and nurses, those on the front lines of the health care dilemma, favor either single payer or public option and around 75% of the public favors single payer or public option and politicians ignore everyone in favor of health insurance CEO's, what does that tell you? It's the old "deep throat" admonition to "follow the money." We lost control of our nation during the Reagan years and I doubt there is much of a chance we'll get it back anytime soon. We have let the lunatics take over the asylum.”


