HHarvey's Comments (3853)

“Hillary was a Washington insider who would not have even got the ball rolling for any of this.”

“Consider the feeling mutual. I think the same of the republican party and their group of sanctimonious, moral superficiality.”

“I would never say never. Although I haven't seen one yet that does it for me and that is probably because the republican party would kick them to the curb first.”

“BS, he married her because someone told him it would be a good idea and she was "familiar". She was a nanny to another pro-golfer friend. Everyone's making such a big deal over this black/white thing on this post that it's laughable. Obviously Tiger has a preference and apparently that's got some people's panties in a bunch.”

“He's only a republican when it is opportunistic for him to be so. The man blows with the wind.”

“So what do you propose to do about things like cancer?”

“agreed!”

“Hey, it doesn't matter who Tiger ended up with. He would be the biggest fool in the world not to have a pre-nup. See Paul McCartney for that. I'm with you, I think given the outrageous philandering and partying going on for so long, this marriage was a product of strategic PR.”

“Personally, I think the marriage has always been a sham, a product of PR.”

“In California if you are married for say... ten years you can petition for alimony for half of those years. The longer you are married the more the pay out. I don't agree, I think she deserves whatever the pre-nup states she deserves. A lot of these high profile marriages are extremely contractual because of the money involved. If I was supporting my husband for years, for instance, and he became a successful doctor making tons of money while I stayed home with the kids, then he decided to kick me to the curb you can bet I would definitely think I deserve a pay out. He made the money, true, but they have children to think about and she did give him that.”

“I have to wonder if he even knew what the heck he was doing. It looked to me like he was caught up in the moment and just absent mindedly gesturing with his hands.”

“You know, I may vote as an independent in 2012, but it sure as he// won't be to vote for Lieberman. He's the biggest backstabbing politician I have ever seen.”

“so you want to kick rightie dems out of your own party? You sound no better than the religious conservatives who want to kick the moderates out of their party. I don't agree with Lieberman, if that's the gist of where you were going with this, and think he has no place in DC. I think if the liberals and the far right are not very careful they will find the independent party a force to be reckoned with in 2010, and I'm not talking about the disorganized tea baggers either, I'm talking about those of us who are in the middle getting tired of being pushed around.”

“Sophie,

I am so sorry for your loss. I too lost a baby, but she was 11 months old. You stated something that I have had to learn the hard way...

"My husband also had a feeling at this point that something was going wrong but didn't say anything as the doctor seemed adamant about getting the job done. And, many of you might be able to relate to this, but in a doctor's surgery it is really easy to go against instinct and not question a doctor while he is working."

I lost my daughter due to an unfortunate mistake that could have been prevented had I listened to my instincts. Like your husband I felt things were wrong, but said nothing. I also went on to have another child, a boy who is 8 years old now, and although I never stop thinking about that other child I do look at my son and realize if it happened differently he would not be here, and he has been a joy. So congratulations to you Sophie on your new child.”

“Wasn't he supposed to be distant cousins with Cheney too? LOL!”

“I know several conservatives that agree with you.”

“Is it just me or doesn't it seem like we are caught in the middle of a war right here in the US between corporate power and Washington DC government power? The only people that have to pay are the Americans caught in between.”

“Huffpo probably won't put in my comment to you, but I have nothing to say to you... polite or otherwise.”

“And there is nothing more condescending than having someone tell a fireman or policeman "get dressed on your own time." And "Not with my taxpayer money". The minute a policeman walks through the door they are on the clock and if you think for one minute that they are going to walk through the door, get dressed and not get paid for it forget it. The city does not give anything to public officers out of the goodness of their hearts and it is always going to be a struggle between the union and the cities. Perhaps the city of Oakland should have thought about this when they went into the bargaining table with the union and went over the contract. I never call people "dear" unless they hit a nerve with me and you just struck it.”

“Hallelujah! I've been complaining about the high volume commercials for years.”

“Okay, you have some valid points, but is it the entire state of Minnesota? or a select county? My point is that the higher the socio economic state of the city/county the more you will see it legal to carry guns into bars,etc. etc. and everyone is a good upstanding citizen who pays their taxes and does what's right, yada yada yada. I can't imagine a place like parts of Detroit allowing that to happen. So where are these gun laws being proposed? In fine upscale environments, places with a lower population, or anywhere at all. The criminals will always be carrying guns and I am not against gun laws to protect property, but you and I as gun owners know that if you take a gun out away from your home your intent is to use it to kill. Like someone else here posted. I wouldn't take my gun to my kid's soccer game and seeing the reactions of some of the parents I wouldn't want to see them holding a gun either. So who makes sure that the parent isn't going to go postal? My point is that rational gun control laws make sense. It is against the law to drive drunk so why should we not make it againast the law to carry concealed weapons into public events?”

“Really? You have yet to hear of assault weapons, the kind used by military personnel, to kill police?”

“Good for you, consider yourself lucky. However, there are big cities with strict gun control laws where criminals can get their hands on a weapon anytime they want. I think that is the point of what was originally said. It's a fact that even Mexican criminals can come across the border and buy guns in the US. That's how easy it is to get a gun here. Our laws can be even tighter, but it wouldn't stop someone from obtaining them. Thus it has always been my contention that the gun is a tool, one of many and that the higher the crime rate in a city the lower the socio economic status of that city. So you must live upscale.”

“That's always been the problem with a certain political party. Nobody cares unless it happens to them. It's the uncaring, don't give a sh*t about anyone but myself ideal. In gun ownership there should be privacy, but there should also be public respect.”

“No, I meant Where is it happening? I know about Arizona, but I also know in Arizona they were not going to allow you to bring a gun into a bar, however how are they going to police that? With weapons scanners at the bar room door? And you didn't tell me where specifically. I would find it interesting.”