HoppinHill's Comments (85)
New Orleans: Where Accountability Failed, Liability Follows
Commented Nov 19, 2009 at 09:53:50 in Politics
“David Conrad, Senior Water Resources Specialist with the National Wildlife Federation just said in an email to me,
“…the finding that the Corps is not shielded from liability for damages caused by their projects is a giant decision which may ultimately and fittingly cost the government billions and billions of dollars. This agency certainly needs to be reformed….””
“…the finding that the Corps is not shielded from liability for damages caused by their projects is a giant decision which may ultimately and fittingly cost the government billions and billions of dollars. This agency certainly needs to be reformed….””
azureblue replied on Nov 19, 2009 at 10:52:31
“Bush and the ACOE were warned (SELA 1995, Times Picayune) about the levee problems and the cost of the catastrophe of levee failure. But they ignored the report, and stopped or slowed repair work on the levees.”
Waste in Your Levee? Don't Blame the Corps
Commented Nov 17, 2009 at 16:57:06 in Politics
“There should have been a Quality Control person working for the contractor and a Quality Assurance person working for the Corps. For debris like that described to have ended up in that levee, two people had to "look the other way."”
RTIII replied on Nov 17, 2009 at 20:18:17
“It's criminal GODDAMNIT, and I want it PROSECUTED.
.”
.”
Flood Insurance: The Flip Side of Katrina
Commented Nov 06, 2009 at 14:25:29 in Politics
“Once again Harry is right. South Louisiana was the region with the highest insurance participation rates as noted by Craig Colten in his new book Perilous Place Powerful Storms.
"At the time Katrina struck in August 2005, Louisiana had significantly higher flood insurance subscribership rates than the national average. One report indicated that 64% of flooded homes had flood insurance," notes Colten.
This has been one of the more stubborn myths that has been used to disparage New Orleans and its citizens in their journey to rebuild homes and lives.”
"At the time Katrina struck in August 2005, Louisiana had significantly higher flood insurance subscribership rates than the national average. One report indicated that 64% of flooded homes had flood insurance," notes Colten.
This has been one of the more stubborn myths that has been used to disparage New Orleans and its citizens in their journey to rebuild homes and lives.”
Out of the Mouths of Corps Managers...
Commented Nov 04, 2009 at 14:38:41 in Politics
“Folks in SE Louisiana are not the only people in America who live near the water. 55% of the nation's population (156 million people) live in counties protected by levees.
http://levees.org/2009/09/30/new-data-sheds-light-on-georgia-flooding/
Further, 39 of 50 of the nation's largest cities lie partly on a floodplain.
http://www.nced.umn.edu/files/NCED_web_site_documents/Education/educator_resources/k12_resources/activities/floodplainactivity.pdf”
http://levees.org/2009/09/30/new-data-sheds-light-on-georgia-flooding/
Further, 39 of 50 of the nation's largest cities lie partly on a floodplain.
http://www.nced.umn.edu/files/NCED_web_site_documents/Education/educator_resources/k12_resources/activities/floodplainactivity.pdf”
New Orleans: The Corps Defends the Future
Commented Oct 31, 2009 at 22:01:34 in Politics
“This is lovely to hear that some at the USACE 'think and regret' their failure in New Orleans. But I promise you that Maj Gen Don Reily (USACE) in January 2008 stood in front of us, New Orleanians and said it was the local New Orleanians who were to blame for the levee failures.
Imagine losing everything you ever had, and hearing the organization responsible tell you it's your fault?
No one at the Corps has been fired, no one has been reprimanded, and nothing has changed since the USACE saw a spectacular failure of one of its most expensive systems.”
Imagine losing everything you ever had, and hearing the organization responsible tell you it's your fault?
No one at the Corps has been fired, no one has been reprimanded, and nothing has changed since the USACE saw a spectacular failure of one of its most expensive systems.”
libertron replied on Nov 01, 2009 at 14:12:50
“Well, the levee failures were their fault, but I don't know if they got enough funding to build proper structures and that would be your representatives' duty. The people in NO should take a lot of the blame because the Fed's duty is to pay for stuff. It was completely foolish to blame President Bush and FEMA for the disaster after Katrina when it was the local government who had the responsability and they didn't step up.
During the floods here in 1997 and this year, the Minnesota and North Dakota National Guards and local emergency units and volunteers did all the work of saving the towns. FEMA came in later with white sedans and guys with clipboards to figure out who to make the checks out to. That's their duty; FEMA doesn't have big trucks and bulldozers and buses to move people. They just pay for stuff. Katrina was a huge failure for the local and state governments. I do blame the people of NO more than ever after Ray Nagin got reelected, when that jackass should have gone the way of Mussolini.”
During the floods here in 1997 and this year, the Minnesota and North Dakota National Guards and local emergency units and volunteers did all the work of saving the towns. FEMA came in later with white sedans and guys with clipboards to figure out who to make the checks out to. That's their duty; FEMA doesn't have big trucks and bulldozers and buses to move people. They just pay for stuff. Katrina was a huge failure for the local and state governments. I do blame the people of NO more than ever after Ray Nagin got reelected, when that jackass should have gone the way of Mussolini.”
MelRoy replied on Nov 01, 2009 at 09:31:33
“From a piece Jeff Young from Living On Earth did:
"The Corps proposed this diversion in the 60's but didn't get it built until the 90's. Once built, it was nearly derailed by a billion-dollar lawsuit from oystermen who claimed the incoming freshwater damaged oyster beds. And while the corps spent $26 million at Caernarvan to help repair wetlands, it spent many times that on another project which destroys wetlands: the Mississippi River Gulf Outlet."
From the LA Times:
"The Orleans Levee District is responsible for maintenance and employs work crews to trim grass along the levee slope. But trees and bushes sprouted from the yards of private homes near the breach site and were left untrimmed for years because of opposition from homeowners and the failure of levee officials to move aggressively."
And from SFGate: "What happened? By 1968, a Congress worn down by the Vietnam war and economic turmoil began reining in spending; at the same time, the work met resistance from Louisiana politicians, communities, environmentalists and businesses fighting for individual interests.
For example, the corps scrapped a plan in the 1970s to build a floodgate at the entrance to Lake Pontchartrain out of concern that it would impede boats and marine life. Next, the alternate plan to build gates at the mouths of city drainage canals was rejected. Finally, the corps built floodwalls on the canals — and they broke during Katrina."”
"The Corps proposed this diversion in the 60's but didn't get it built until the 90's. Once built, it was nearly derailed by a billion-dollar lawsuit from oystermen who claimed the incoming freshwater damaged oyster beds. And while the corps spent $26 million at Caernarvan to help repair wetlands, it spent many times that on another project which destroys wetlands: the Mississippi River Gulf Outlet."
From the LA Times:
"The Orleans Levee District is responsible for maintenance and employs work crews to trim grass along the levee slope. But trees and bushes sprouted from the yards of private homes near the breach site and were left untrimmed for years because of opposition from homeowners and the failure of levee officials to move aggressively."
And from SFGate: "What happened? By 1968, a Congress worn down by the Vietnam war and economic turmoil began reining in spending; at the same time, the work met resistance from Louisiana politicians, communities, environmentalists and businesses fighting for individual interests.
For example, the corps scrapped a plan in the 1970s to build a floodgate at the entrance to Lake Pontchartrain out of concern that it would impede boats and marine life. Next, the alternate plan to build gates at the mouths of city drainage canals was rejected. Finally, the corps built floodwalls on the canals — and they broke during Katrina."”
MelRoy replied on Nov 01, 2009 at 09:02:06
“I wasn't at the meeting so don't know exactly what was said, but I was there during and after Betsy. At the time, the ACE wanted to try something different. In fact, an Act of Congress mandated it and President Johnson signed it into law.
The solution that the ACE came up with - which was probably viable - was to install a gate-type system similar to what the Dutch have since used around the shores of Lake Pontchartrain. It was called the Lake Pontchartrain Hurricane Barrier Project. The storm gates would have closed off the Rigolets and Chef Menteur Passes.
According to the Los Angeles Times, "The project was stopped on Dec. 30, 1977, by U.S. District Judge Charles Schwartz Jr., who said the corps' environmental impact statement had failed to satisfy federal environmental laws. Schwartz ruled that the region "would be irreparably harmed" if the barrier project was allowed to continue. He chastised the Army for its inadequate environmental impact statement, which was based in part on a single biologist who never submitted a written report."
"The project faced strong opposition from the environmental group Save Our Wetlands, fishermen and the St. Tammany Parish, just north of Lake Pontchartrain, which had hoped to see a large shipyard built on a bayou. The shipyard was never built; today the area is underwater."”
The solution that the ACE came up with - which was probably viable - was to install a gate-type system similar to what the Dutch have since used around the shores of Lake Pontchartrain. It was called the Lake Pontchartrain Hurricane Barrier Project. The storm gates would have closed off the Rigolets and Chef Menteur Passes.
According to the Los Angeles Times, "The project was stopped on Dec. 30, 1977, by U.S. District Judge Charles Schwartz Jr., who said the corps' environmental impact statement had failed to satisfy federal environmental laws. Schwartz ruled that the region "would be irreparably harmed" if the barrier project was allowed to continue. He chastised the Army for its inadequate environmental impact statement, which was based in part on a single biologist who never submitted a written report."
"The project faced strong opposition from the environmental group Save Our Wetlands, fishermen and the St. Tammany Parish, just north of Lake Pontchartrain, which had hoped to see a large shipyard built on a bayou. The shipyard was never built; today the area is underwater."”
New Orleans: The Corps Defends the Future
Commented Oct 31, 2009 at 15:32:59 in Politics
“One: 55% of the nations's population lives in counties protected by levees.
Two: The levee failures in New Orleans was the WORST civil engineering disaster in the history of the USA and the worst in the WORLD since the Chernobyl meltdown. In such horrific conditions breakdowns like those you describe can occur.
Three: Had the flood protection been built right, and had Louisiana's wetlands not been degraded by the nation's thirst for cheap oil, none of those incidents would have occurred.”
Two: The levee failures in New Orleans was the WORST civil engineering disaster in the history of the USA and the worst in the WORLD since the Chernobyl meltdown. In such horrific conditions breakdowns like those you describe can occur.
Three: Had the flood protection been built right, and had Louisiana's wetlands not been degraded by the nation's thirst for cheap oil, none of those incidents would have occurred.”
xlntcat replied on Nov 02, 2009 at 03:50:07
“The Corp of Engineer's in NO is as corrupt and the government of LA and that is very, very corrupt. Billions of federal dollars have been poured into the state in the afthermath of Katrina and if the state had to account for its disappearance, they could fill up the prison system.”
New Orleans: The Corps Defends the Future
Commented Oct 31, 2009 at 11:47:12 in Politics
“And another thing, jacw20! I know of no engineer who would build a building, a bridge, or a dam and sign her/her name to it that will "collapse given a large enough storm."
Levees, like bridges, buildings and dams are civilly engineered structures. And in New Orleans, design and the construction of the levees belongs solely to your employer.”
Levees, like bridges, buildings and dams are civilly engineered structures. And in New Orleans, design and the construction of the levees belongs solely to your employer.”
New Orleans: The Corps Defends the Future
Commented Oct 31, 2009 at 10:47:47 in Politics
“A whopping 55% of the American population lives in counties protected by levees according to FEMA on September 10, 2009. So should we all move?”
MelRoy replied on Nov 01, 2009 at 05:45:55
“Part of it is the design of the levees themselves. In defence of the ACE, they have tried to introduce gated levees, which allow the silt to settle back into the rivers, but it seems to me from everything I've read that politics and money have interfered with the introduction of "eco-friendly" flood barriers which actually work. Besides marvels of engineering, there are a number of other ways to divert floodwaters. But certainly, part of the problem is the lack of floodplains and wetland habitats (marshes). And too much hard surface. There's nowhere for water to go except into people's properties...or so it seems.
So how do other low-lying, flood-prone, highly populated places like Zeeland and East Anglia deal with it? Because they had the political will to make some people move, to reclaim land and to spend money to pay the best engineers to erect the Thames Barrier and the more comprehensive Dutch system ("Delta Plan").
Yes - some people will have to give up their riverside and lakefront homes. They represent perhaps a fraction of a percent of the population. They will have to move, to protect the 45% whose homes and livelihoods and currently estimated to be threatened by flooding.
http://www.boston.com/news/world/europe/articles/2005/12/05/holland_goes_beyond_holding_back_the_tide/”
So how do other low-lying, flood-prone, highly populated places like Zeeland and East Anglia deal with it? Because they had the political will to make some people move, to reclaim land and to spend money to pay the best engineers to erect the Thames Barrier and the more comprehensive Dutch system ("Delta Plan").
Yes - some people will have to give up their riverside and lakefront homes. They represent perhaps a fraction of a percent of the population. They will have to move, to protect the 45% whose homes and livelihoods and currently estimated to be threatened by flooding.
http://www.boston.com/news/world/europe/articles/2005/12/05/holland_goes_beyond_holding_back_the_tide/”
New Orleans: The Corps Defends the Future
Commented Oct 31, 2009 at 10:46:42 in Politics
“The levees did not fail due to foundations, they failed for a variety of reasons including but not limited to: poor design, levees in some places were filled with sand not clay, levees were too low and not armored.
Also, there is no credible evidence that the state or local government in LA were relevant to the flood protection failures. In fact it's refuted in Judge Duval's final judgment Jan 30, 2008, and In Woolley Shabman's Hurricane Decision Chronology.
Congress appropriated no money specifically for New Orleans. It appropriated $110 Billion for three storms covering four states.”
Also, there is no credible evidence that the state or local government in LA were relevant to the flood protection failures. In fact it's refuted in Judge Duval's final judgment Jan 30, 2008, and In Woolley Shabman's Hurricane Decision Chronology.
Congress appropriated no money specifically for New Orleans. It appropriated $110 Billion for three storms covering four states.”
theycallthewindmariah replied on Oct 31, 2009 at 13:11:59
“There's a difference between leeves and floodwalls. Proper engineering, with a basis in good geology, is critical to both.
And from everything I know of New Orleans and Louisiana, politics and corruption have been intregal since the days of the pirates.”
And from everything I know of New Orleans and Louisiana, politics and corruption have been intregal since the days of the pirates.”
New Orleans: The Corps Defends the Future
Commented Oct 31, 2009 at 10:41:40 in Politics
“You may be a USACE engineer but your post is full of lies. The Corps has never said the New Orleans levees would collapse (except verbally in bars.) And it's documented that the main basin of New Orleans was getting 250 year protection. (Hurricane Decision Chronology, Woolley and Shabman, June 2007).
I can say however, that your final sentence is true. Change does need to be made in the way projects are chosen.”
I can say however, that your final sentence is true. Change does need to be made in the way projects are chosen.”
New Orleans: The Corps Defends the Future
Commented Oct 31, 2009 at 10:34:36 in Politics
“jcwtts, I must point out that only Congress can authorize flood protection for LA and LA has only 9 members of Congress out of 585. Note that just 2 weeks ago, the Corps did some behind the scene lobbying and convinced key members of Congress to build inferior flood protection for the main basin of New Orleans. Getting Congress to understand what's going on in LA is not as simple as you describe.”
New Orleans: The Corps Defends the Future
Commented Oct 31, 2009 at 10:30:18 in Politics
“jcwtts1, with logic like that then you might as well go around saying that Traffic broke the Interstate-35 bridge in Minneapolis. Of course no one says that. Both the traffic and Katrina revealed structural flaws. Both exposed blatant civil engineering mistakes. So, no the flooding in New Orleans is NOT due to Katrina (a natural event), it's due to levee failure, a man-made event.
Futhermore, there is NO evidence that the levee failures were predicted. This has been studied in depth and covered in a 6-part series by Carol Forsloff in the Digital Journal. The levee failures on August 29, 2005 were such a big surprise that no one even knew who to spell the word 'breach."”
Futhermore, there is NO evidence that the levee failures were predicted. This has been studied in depth and covered in a 6-part series by Carol Forsloff in the Digital Journal. The levee failures on August 29, 2005 were such a big surprise that no one even knew who to spell the word 'breach."”
New Orleans: The Corps Defends the Future
Commented Oct 30, 2009 at 16:24:58 in Politics
“Harry, so glad to hear you're producing a documentary film on the causes of the flooding in New Orleans.”
Obama in New Orleans: Been and Gone and Got It Wrong
Commented Oct 16, 2009 at 15:48:11 in Politics
“My friends and I all say "levee breaks" or "federal flood."”
Obama in New Orleans: Been and Gone and Got It Wrong
Commented Oct 16, 2009 at 11:33:57 in Politics
“It's true, the President did say later in the speech that "the feds were at least "partially" responsible for our flooding."
It was rather buried, and spoken in a general non-specific way, but yes, he did say it.”
It was rather buried, and spoken in a general non-specific way, but yes, he did say it.”
Obama in New Orleans: Been and Gone and Got It Wrong
Commented Oct 16, 2009 at 11:14:38 in Politics
“Do Jindal, Landrieu or Vitter deserve blame for what? For the flooding? Because the answer to that is a resounding no.
In New Orleans, by federal mandate, responsibility for designing and building the flood protection belongs solely to YOUR Army Corps of Engineers.
http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d051050t.pdf”
In New Orleans, by federal mandate, responsibility for designing and building the flood protection belongs solely to YOUR Army Corps of Engineers.
http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d051050t.pdf”
Obama in New Orleans: Been and Gone and Got It Wrong
Commented Oct 16, 2009 at 10:56:15 in Politics
“As noted by author John McQuaid, using Katrina Shorthand gives "underlying associations of “natural disaster swamps city below sea level – what the heck are those people doing living down there?"
This is not a minor semantic point, he says.
Sure, lumping this altogether as "Katrina" is shorter, but it's not accurate. And the future of a million people depends on proper characterization of the flooding on August 29, 2005.”
This is not a minor semantic point, he says.
Sure, lumping this altogether as "Katrina" is shorter, but it's not accurate. And the future of a million people depends on proper characterization of the flooding on August 29, 2005.”
Obama in New Orleans: Been and Gone and Got It Wrong
Commented Oct 16, 2009 at 10:40:32 in Politics
“Using lazy shorthand and saying Katrina flooded New Orleans is like saying traffic wrecked that bridge in Minneapolis.
Both Katrina and the traffic revealed structural flaws. Both exposed blatant civil engineering incompetence.
And in the case of New Orleans, the engineers worked for YOUR Army Corps.”
Both Katrina and the traffic revealed structural flaws. Both exposed blatant civil engineering incompetence.
And in the case of New Orleans, the engineers worked for YOUR Army Corps.”
Obama in New Orleans: Been and Gone and Got It Wrong
Commented Oct 16, 2009 at 09:56:25 in Politics
“Even Mississippi residents, envious of the attention Louisiana has received since August 2005, even THEY point out that metro New Orleans wasn't "struck by Katrina" but was flooded by levee failure.
And Mississippi isn't exactly enamored with the folks in LA.”
And Mississippi isn't exactly enamored with the folks in LA.”
Obama's Visits -- Compare the Length of the Stays
Commented Oct 14, 2009 at 16:25:52 in Politics
“Four hours in New Orleans and sixteen in San Francisco?”
CrescentCityRay replied on Oct 14, 2009 at 17:27:42
“It is obviously a matter of priorities.”
ThinkCreeps replied on Oct 14, 2009 at 17:13:41
“Looks exceptionally generous to New Orleans”
Obama in New Orleans -- Is That All There Is?
Commented Oct 12, 2009 at 09:15:36 in Politics
“The outdoor editor of the New Orleans Times Picayune, Bob Marshall, makes the best recommendation:
"How about a national speech from the Oval Office by President Obama detailing the tragedy of our coast, explaining how the nation's thirst for cheap energy and a dependable industrial corridor eviscerated the continent's greatest delta and imposed a death sentence on an entire region?"
http://www.nola.com/opinions/index.ssf/2009/10/obama_jindal_have_a_job_to_do.html”
"How about a national speech from the Oval Office by President Obama detailing the tragedy of our coast, explaining how the nation's thirst for cheap energy and a dependable industrial corridor eviscerated the continent's greatest delta and imposed a death sentence on an entire region?"
http://www.nola.com/opinions/index.ssf/2009/10/obama_jindal_have_a_job_to_do.html”
kobrock1 replied on Oct 12, 2009 at 10:17:00
“Wouldn't the delta thrive if it were not for the levee system that is necessary for people to inhabit New Orleans and the surrounding region? There's obviously trade-offs for most human endeavors; with no levees, there would be no New Orleans. Alligators and nutria need a stronger lobby.
Incidentally, I still like my energy cheap; it's not as if I've got a problem with what to do with too much money.”
Incidentally, I still like my energy cheap; it's not as if I've got a problem with what to do with too much money.”
Charmed replied on Oct 12, 2009 at 09:34:09
“If he was to do a national speech people would still complain.
He really shouldn't be talking to the kids, he should be flying over them and looking at things. Yeah, that would be a much better use of his time.”
He really shouldn't be talking to the kids, he should be flying over them and looking at things. Yeah, that would be a much better use of his time.”
New Orleans: Who Calls the Shots?
Commented Oct 05, 2009 at 13:39:06 in Politics
“LMPE, if exposure to hurricanes were a reason to relocate people out of New Orleans, then we might as well relocate everyone who lives in an area when events can be described by a scale, be it Saffir Simpson, Richter or Fujita.”
New Orleans: Who Calls the Shots?
Commented Oct 05, 2009 at 09:50:51 in Politics
“This is highly disturbing to hear, especially since it's Congress that decides if and how New Orleans will be protected from storm surge.
Responsibility for storm surge protection got taken away from New Orleans (and nearby St. Bernard Parish) in 1965, and now those citizens are at the mercy of Congress, and ultimately the POTUS.”
Responsibility for storm surge protection got taken away from New Orleans (and nearby St. Bernard Parish) in 1965, and now those citizens are at the mercy of Congress, and ultimately the POTUS.”
backhandpath replied on Oct 05, 2009 at 10:17:11
“Yes, Obama is supposed to be the Commander In Chief, yet appears to be getting all his direction from the Corps of Engineers, hence a Gulf Coast Hurricane Recovery Trip to the New Orleans Disaster Ward Thingy Place... a trip that doesn't include the Gulf Coast or Hurricane Recovery.
The Hurricane hit Mississippi and the Corps of Engineers hit New Orleans.
We survived the hurricane...
Go Figure...Go Fish!
As Harry described in one post "Going Insider", after a labyrinth of playing cards and who'dats, he finally met with the President's Word on this --and who did THAT turn out to be? You guessed it, our Exquisite Corps!
Everyone is saying we should be Nice to the President when he comes to town.
But, I really think our attitude towards his bourgeois naivete regarding the Flood of New Orleans does not matter, because he and his "people" don't seem to be listening to We The People.
While there is no cause for Rudeness, I am just about tired of Obama's Game and think he now owes us more than a few explanations about the Corps of Engineers continued Bad Engineering Scams --not more full court press partays.
We have problems in New Orleans:in-operable pumps, un-repaired bad flood walls, millions of dollars getting shifted around from project to project.
He has had the OSC Report on this (again posted by Harry) on his desk since JUNE.
We need Answers and we need Action from the Commander In Chief.”
The Hurricane hit Mississippi and the Corps of Engineers hit New Orleans.
We survived the hurricane...
Go Figure...Go Fish!
As Harry described in one post "Going Insider", after a labyrinth of playing cards and who'dats, he finally met with the President's Word on this --and who did THAT turn out to be? You guessed it, our Exquisite Corps!
Everyone is saying we should be Nice to the President when he comes to town.
But, I really think our attitude towards his bourgeois naivete regarding the Flood of New Orleans does not matter, because he and his "people" don't seem to be listening to We The People.
While there is no cause for Rudeness, I am just about tired of Obama's Game and think he now owes us more than a few explanations about the Corps of Engineers continued Bad Engineering Scams --not more full court press partays.
We have problems in New Orleans:in-operable pumps, un-repaired bad flood walls, millions of dollars getting shifted around from project to project.
He has had the OSC Report on this (again posted by Harry) on his desk since JUNE.
We need Answers and we need Action from the Commander In Chief.”
Obama's Plate is Not Too Full After All
Commented Sep 28, 2009 at 19:39:51 in Politics
“New Orleans was destroyed overwhelmingly and primarily to two things: Levee failure (built by the Corps) and destruction of protective wetlands by the Mississippi River Gulf outlet (built by the Corps).
All were paid for with federal dollars where a very few humans (business owners) benefited and the environment and citizens of South Louisiana lost.”
All were paid for with federal dollars where a very few humans (business owners) benefited and the environment and citizens of South Louisiana lost.”
Obama's Plate is Not Too Full After All
Commented Sep 28, 2009 at 18:18:41 in Politics
“Saying a hurricane destroyed New Orleans is like saying traffic destroyed that bridge in Minneapolis.”


