Edit Preferences
Logout
IsidoroRDL's Comments (3)
View Comments:
Sort:
DoJ Attack On Siegelman's Rights Threatens Election Rights For All
Commented Sep 11, 2009 at 16:11:40 in Politics
“The evidence is that the denial of access to an impartial court and civil jury trial to oppose malfeasance is a part a wider conspiracy to abuse the delegation from Congress to the Judicial Branch under Rules Enabling Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2072(b); the Judicial Conference of the United States Act, 28 U.S.C. § 331; and the Judiciary Act of 1925 (providing for “discretionary appellate jurisdiction,” at 43 Stat. 936). Thus, this is a “legal” issue which Congress must investigate
Query, if I with more than 35 years of federal trail/appellate civil litigation experience can be targeted by the government and courts for exercising my federal statutory rights and deprived of access to an impartial court and civil jury trial to stop malfeasance--what is either an inexperience attorney or a layman father to do to protect their rights against malfeasance by the government and courts? (see, http://www.liamsdad.org/others/isidoro.shtmll; and http://home.earthlink.net/~malfeasance).
Our Republic cannot survive the unbridled tyranny of government attorneys and judges’ use of cronyism to deny access to an impartial court, and then surreally placed themselves above and beyond the law. We need only recall the sorry use of acts by German judges, lawyers, and law schools to permit Hitler and the NAZI’s to power.”
Query, if I with more than 35 years of federal trail/appellate civil litigation experience can be targeted by the government and courts for exercising my federal statutory rights and deprived of access to an impartial court and civil jury trial to stop malfeasance--what is either an inexperience attorney or a layman father to do to protect their rights against malfeasance by the government and courts? (see, http://www.liamsdad.org/others/isidoro.shtmll; and http://home.earthlink.net/~malfeasance).
Our Republic cannot survive the unbridled tyranny of government attorneys and judges’ use of cronyism to deny access to an impartial court, and then surreally placed themselves above and beyond the law. We need only recall the sorry use of acts by German judges, lawyers, and law schools to permit Hitler and the NAZI’s to power.”
Hypocrisy Alert: Cheney Relies on the Objectivity of the Justice Department to Defend Torture
Commented Sep 01, 2009 at 16:10:34 in Politics
“DOJ and Federal Judges Conspiracy to Violate the Constitution and Rule of Law must make all citizens realize that Democracies such as ours are precarious institutions. Therefore, constant vigilance must be maintained to preserve our Constitution from government encroachment. “There is no crueler tyranny than that which is exercised under cover of law, and with the colors of justice. . . .”U.S. vs. Jannottie, 673 F.2d 578, 614 (3d Cir. 1982).
Thus, when discussing the use of legal sophistry by attorneys in DOJ to circumvent the limitations in the Constitution and the Rule of Law we cannot ignore the evidence of prior discussions with the Judicial Branch. We must recall the sorry behavior of German judges and lawyers which did play a key part in allowing Hitler and the NAZI’s to power. History confirms that “[b]y the time the gas vans came and the human slaughter factories were built in Auschwitz and the other death camps, the murder of the six million Jews and other persecuted minorities was done completely within the framework of German law.” Yad Vshem, The Holocaust Martyrs’ and Heroes Remembrance Authority, 2004.
This collusion is but a sub-part of a much larger issue of the on gong criminal conspiracy of government attorneys and judges violation of the law and then grant themselves immunity. But, “[n]o man in this country is so high that he is above the law,” US v. Lee, 106 U.S. 196, 220 (1882) http://home.earthlink.net/~malfeasancee).”
Thus, when discussing the use of legal sophistry by attorneys in DOJ to circumvent the limitations in the Constitution and the Rule of Law we cannot ignore the evidence of prior discussions with the Judicial Branch. We must recall the sorry behavior of German judges and lawyers which did play a key part in allowing Hitler and the NAZI’s to power. History confirms that “[b]y the time the gas vans came and the human slaughter factories were built in Auschwitz and the other death camps, the murder of the six million Jews and other persecuted minorities was done completely within the framework of German law.” Yad Vshem, The Holocaust Martyrs’ and Heroes Remembrance Authority, 2004.
This collusion is but a sub-part of a much larger issue of the on gong criminal conspiracy of government attorneys and judges violation of the law and then grant themselves immunity. But, “[n]o man in this country is so high that he is above the law,” US v. Lee, 106 U.S. 196, 220 (1882) http://home.earthlink.net/~malfeasancee).”
Why Rove Attacks Eric Holder: To Provide Cover for Bush's Pardons
Commented Dec 19, 2008 at 14:11:34 in Politics
“Greetings,
As explained I request to testify before in opposition to the confirmation of Eric Holder http://capwiz.com/congressorg/sbx/f/?aid=12313551&r=11):
First, the evidence confirms that as a Beltway attorney/lobbyist he violated his oath as an attorney to serve the public. He is the linchpin in a RICO criminal conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242, and 1513, by retaliating, punishing, and stigmatizing me for litigating to enforce my federal statutory rights as a father http://www.home.earthlink.net/~isidoror/id6.htmll; and http://www.liamsdad.org/others/isidoro.shtml). Thus, he will be a defendant in a civil RICO and 18 U.S.C. § 3771 action to be filed in February 2009.
Second, Eric Holder served in policy positions at DOJ in the 90's, at the same time I litigated in the U.S. Tax Court, the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 11th, and DC Circuits, as well as Supreme Court, against the unauthorized polices and practices of DOJ in violation of the right of Hispanics.* Thus, his policy is that the public has no right to expect accountability (i.e., the pardon of Marc Rich).
Isidoro Rodriguez, Esq.
*See Martinez v. Lamagno and DOJ/DEA, 515 U.S. 417 (1995)(DOJ asserted absolute immunity for negligent acts) and Lopez v. First Union, 129 F3.rd. 1186 (11th Cir. 1997)( DOJ wanted to seize every nonresident Hispanic bank accounts in the U.S.)[Web: http://justiciaportodo.webs.com].”
As explained I request to testify before in opposition to the confirmation of Eric Holder http://capwiz.com/congressorg/sbx/f/?aid=12313551&r=11):
First, the evidence confirms that as a Beltway attorney/lobbyist he violated his oath as an attorney to serve the public. He is the linchpin in a RICO criminal conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242, and 1513, by retaliating, punishing, and stigmatizing me for litigating to enforce my federal statutory rights as a father http://www.home.earthlink.net/~isidoror/id6.htmll; and http://www.liamsdad.org/others/isidoro.shtml). Thus, he will be a defendant in a civil RICO and 18 U.S.C. § 3771 action to be filed in February 2009.
Second, Eric Holder served in policy positions at DOJ in the 90's, at the same time I litigated in the U.S. Tax Court, the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 11th, and DC Circuits, as well as Supreme Court, against the unauthorized polices and practices of DOJ in violation of the right of Hispanics.* Thus, his policy is that the public has no right to expect accountability (i.e., the pardon of Marc Rich).
Isidoro Rodriguez, Esq.
*See Martinez v. Lamagno and DOJ/DEA, 515 U.S. 417 (1995)(DOJ asserted absolute immunity for negligent acts) and Lopez v. First Union, 129 F3.rd. 1186 (11th Cir. 1997)( DOJ wanted to seize every nonresident Hispanic bank accounts in the U.S.)[Web: http://justiciaportodo.webs.com].”
