JackNasty's Comments (280)
Christian Leaders Scapegoat Gays on Marriage
Commented Nov 26, 2009 at 12:26:26 in Politics
“If the churches own marriage as you seem to believe, then why is it possible to marry without ever setting foot inside a church, but it is NOT possible to marry without a license from the state?
The state has licensed marriage at least since 1790 BC as recorded by the Code Hammurabi. That code is older than any existent western religion including Judaism and Christianity.”
The state has licensed marriage at least since 1790 BC as recorded by the Code Hammurabi. That code is older than any existent western religion including Judaism and Christianity.”
A Roadmap For 2010 DADT Repeal
Commented Nov 25, 2009 at 07:07:06 in Politics
“Bigots need to shut up and realize equal protection under the law is the highest priority.”
Rosewood1923 replied on Nov 25, 2009 at 13:07:01
“You see, that's where you're wrong. Most Americans would like the President to put the needs of the country, as a whole, above all else. This issue is a priority for a tiny sliver of America's citizenry. Haven't you been paying attention?”
Making Tea for 2010: Tea Partiers Fight For The Right to Robocall
Commented Nov 16, 2009 at 17:44:29 in Politics
“Being a tea bagger is:
A. A fashion statement
B. An admission of paranoid delusions
C. Both”
A. A fashion statement
B. An admission of paranoid delusions
C. Both”
Catholic Church Threatens To Stop Feeding Homeless Over Gay Marriage
Commented Nov 13, 2009 at 10:46:42 in Politics
“No, he means tax payers' dollars paid to "Catholic Charities" by our government.for supposedly charitable services rendered.”
hp blogger K.J. Dwyer replied on Nov 13, 2009 at 10:57:54
“Exactly, thank you. It's worth noting that in the supplied link, the president and CEO of Catholic Charities stipulates to this fact unequivocally.”
Marriage Equality and the Myth of "Gay Apartheid"
Commented Nov 12, 2009 at 11:26:12 in Politics
“So, according to David Kaufman it's only "Homo-hysterics":
David Kaufman needs to cut the only black people have suffered nonsense.
• Gay men and women were and still are rejected by their own families. African Americans were never disowned by their families because they were black.
• Gay people were cast out from the schools, churches and circles of friends. African Americans always had their schools, friends and churches
• Gay men and women were locked up for life in insane asylums for being gay. African Americans were not.
• Gay men and women were convicted of violating sodomy laws and locked up as criminals and even executed for being gay.
• It's 2009, African Americans have been protected from discrimination by state and federal laws since 1964. Gay men and women are fighting to repeal laws that require federal and state governments to discriminate against us.
• Gay men and women are still fired from their jobs just for being gay and in most of the US they have no legal recourse.
• Gay men and women are still being discharged from the military because they are gay.
• Gay men and women are not free to marry their partners in all but five states.
Next time you feel the urge write an article implying that gay people haven't suffered from discrimination , think of what you have just read and how ridiculous and offensive the comment you are about to make is.
"Homo-hysteria" indeed!”
David Kaufman needs to cut the only black people have suffered nonsense.
• Gay men and women were and still are rejected by their own families. African Americans were never disowned by their families because they were black.
• Gay people were cast out from the schools, churches and circles of friends. African Americans always had their schools, friends and churches
• Gay men and women were locked up for life in insane asylums for being gay. African Americans were not.
• Gay men and women were convicted of violating sodomy laws and locked up as criminals and even executed for being gay.
• It's 2009, African Americans have been protected from discrimination by state and federal laws since 1964. Gay men and women are fighting to repeal laws that require federal and state governments to discriminate against us.
• Gay men and women are still fired from their jobs just for being gay and in most of the US they have no legal recourse.
• Gay men and women are still being discharged from the military because they are gay.
• Gay men and women are not free to marry their partners in all but five states.
Next time you feel the urge write an article implying that gay people haven't suffered from discrimination , think of what you have just read and how ridiculous and offensive the comment you are about to make is.
"Homo-hysteria" indeed!”
jcwtts1 replied on Nov 12, 2009 at 13:01:49
“This is part of the point of the above blog. Your lack of historical understanding is surpassed only by you inability to see any other pain but your own. You speak and act from a position of privilege. White male privileged. You speak from a position of ignorance, of normative positioning which is what the article above is about. Your insistence that this conversation is about who has greater pain or suffering is part of the problem... but since you have made your list let me just say this: Closet. get the point.”
honoursplendor replied on Nov 12, 2009 at 12:58:44
“No one is saying that gay people do not suffer discrimination but equating not being able to get married to systemic, sustained brutality and discrimination? Violent beatings, raping of women to dilute the race? Brutal murderers protected? The reasons that comparisons to any specific civil rights crusades do not work is that these things ARE NOT equivalent. The women's movement is not the same as civil rights for blacks or recognition of american indians or equal rights for gays. Different struggles, different eras, reasonings etc. Also, you have some misinformation:
• Gay people were cast out from the schools, churches and circles of friends. African Americans always had their schools, friends and churches -- And blacks were not denied even entry to these same schools and circles??!?!? Your solution is "separate but equal"?
• Gay men and women were and still are rejected by their own families. African Americans were never disowned by their families because they were black. --- This is not true, there have been/are many blacks that are rejected based on their skin color even in their own families; some acute self-hatred in the black community is well known in certain circles. Try googling "brown paper bag test" or "good hair"
• African Americans have been protected from discrimination by state and federal laws since 1964. --- Yes, 100 hundred years after slavery, and now racism is over right? No more discrimination against blacks these days?”
• Gay people were cast out from the schools, churches and circles of friends. African Americans always had their schools, friends and churches -- And blacks were not denied even entry to these same schools and circles??!?!? Your solution is "separate but equal"?
• Gay men and women were and still are rejected by their own families. African Americans were never disowned by their families because they were black. --- This is not true, there have been/are many blacks that are rejected based on their skin color even in their own families; some acute self-hatred in the black community is well known in certain circles. Try googling "brown paper bag test" or "good hair"
• African Americans have been protected from discrimination by state and federal laws since 1964. --- Yes, 100 hundred years after slavery, and now racism is over right? No more discrimination against blacks these days?”
Nommo replied on Nov 12, 2009 at 12:38:58
“Funny thing here is that the author made no such claim. Point out where he says that "gay people haven't suffered from discrimination". It might help tremendously if you actually went back and read the blog all over again, if in fact you read it the first time. Further, your claims regarding what ever or never happened to Black people in this country are absurd, ahistorical, and reek of bombast.
You should actually read the Civil Rights Act. You seem to think that it only applies to Black people. That is profound ignorance in operation.”
You should actually read the Civil Rights Act. You seem to think that it only applies to Black people. That is profound ignorance in operation.”
PhilipB replied on Nov 12, 2009 at 11:45:32
“Thank you for your post.”
Marriage Equality and the Myth of "Gay Apartheid"
Commented Nov 11, 2009 at 18:49:31 in Politics
“Thank you for the well written insight.”
NARAL and Planned Parenthood: Ineffectiveness Anti-Choice Democrats Can Rely On
Commented Nov 07, 2009 at 20:49:53 in Politics
“This is heartbreaking. Before Roe v. Wade, and the summer before our first year in college, one of my high school classmates was knocked up by her handsome but irresponsible boyfriend. She knew she was unfit to be a mother at that stage of her life and she was afraid that her own drug abuse, which included ingesting lots and lots of LSD, would deform the baby.
Making discreet inquiries, she located a doctor in Salt Lake City. He was a respected obstetrician who secretly performed abortions. The cost of the procedure was equivalent to a years tuition at our high school, which today is about $16,000/. It had to be performed in his office at night. No hospital backup was available. My friend had to make several clandescent visits to his office for treatments to releive hemmoraging.
My friend and her boyfriend's paid black market prices for the abortion. The circumstances imposed by Utah's laws placed my friends life at risk. This is exactly what theocrats, cretins and women hating zealots want to be the norm again.
If the Democratic Party refuses to defend our country from these theocrats ,cretins and bigots, we need to create a party that will.”
Making discreet inquiries, she located a doctor in Salt Lake City. He was a respected obstetrician who secretly performed abortions. The cost of the procedure was equivalent to a years tuition at our high school, which today is about $16,000/. It had to be performed in his office at night. No hospital backup was available. My friend had to make several clandescent visits to his office for treatments to releive hemmoraging.
My friend and her boyfriend's paid black market prices for the abortion. The circumstances imposed by Utah's laws placed my friends life at risk. This is exactly what theocrats, cretins and women hating zealots want to be the norm again.
If the Democratic Party refuses to defend our country from these theocrats ,cretins and bigots, we need to create a party that will.”
p0s3r replied on Nov 07, 2009 at 21:02:36
“Having unprotected sex and abusing drug abuse put your friends life at risk. Not any policy.”
What is the "Message" Behind Increased Gun Sales?
Commented Nov 06, 2009 at 11:19:09 in Politics
“"Logical concerns": Neither logic nor reasoning have anything to do with wing-nuts arming themselves for an NRA inspired insurrection.
Thankfully the well regulated militia described in thge 2nd Amendement, now called the National Guard, is here to protect us from these armed yahoos when they become violent.
Remember Waco? How'd that work out for the arms hoarding cultists?”
Thankfully the well regulated militia described in thge 2nd Amendement, now called the National Guard, is here to protect us from these armed yahoos when they become violent.
Remember Waco? How'd that work out for the arms hoarding cultists?”
mike102 replied on Nov 06, 2009 at 13:43:18
“First, as a result of the War on Terror, the National Guard of any state can now be called out directly by the President, without so much as a 'by-your-leave' from the governor of that state. Hence, the National Guard is just an extension of the Army, and no longer a militia.
Evidently, you are unfamiliar with the 'Unorganized Militia, or the legal, US Code (Federal Law) definition of 'militia'.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/10/usc_sec_10_00000311----000-.html
Enjoy!”
Evidently, you are unfamiliar with the 'Unorganized Militia, or the legal, US Code (Federal Law) definition of 'militia'.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/10/usc_sec_10_00000311----000-.html
Enjoy!”
Mark0 replied on Nov 06, 2009 at 13:28:51
“"...arms hoarding cultists?"
I do remember. They died at the hands of an overzealous governement...and for what? For practicing their freedom to assemble, to worship as they chose, and to keep and bear arms.
Now who was it that was practicing violent insurrection at Waco...who could that have been?? Hmmm???
Maybe...the government???
Your own example makes it seem very logical and reasonable for the the People to arm themselves, even if you don't like it.”
I do remember. They died at the hands of an overzealous governement...and for what? For practicing their freedom to assemble, to worship as they chose, and to keep and bear arms.
Now who was it that was practicing violent insurrection at Waco...who could that have been?? Hmmm???
Maybe...the government???
Your own example makes it seem very logical and reasonable for the the People to arm themselves, even if you don't like it.”
legaleagle 45 replied on Nov 06, 2009 at 12:47:14
“JackNasty wrote: "Thankfully the well regulated militia described in thge 2nd Amendement, now called the National Guard"
The National Guard is not the only or exclusive "well regulated militia".”
The National Guard is not the only or exclusive "well regulated militia".”
djcrsn replied on Nov 06, 2009 at 11:54:10
“Sorry--as despicable as the Branch Davidians were--the law enforcement agencies involved were WORSE--or do you support "saving" the children by burning them to death”
OdinsEye replied on Nov 06, 2009 at 11:25:52
“The right to keep and bear arms is not dependent on participation in a militia.”
ChangeNow replied on Nov 06, 2009 at 11:25:16
“I think you missed his point. People may be buying because of the perception that there will be increased taxes or future difficulties in obtaining guns. They feel like they are getting in before the doors close. No mention of insurrection.”
Time to Repeal DOMA
Commented Nov 01, 2009 at 18:39:40 in Politics
“What a load of Clintonista revisionist history. There has never been 2/3 majority in the House and Senate and 2/3 d of the states necessary to pass such an amendment. Only 13 sates have passed amendments banning marriage equality.”
A Sad Day for Californians: Gavin Newsom's Withdrawl from the Race for Governor
Commented Nov 01, 2009 at 17:46:11 in Politics
“Why should anyone but the people involved care if Gavin Newsom had a fling?”
SeattleDeadhead replied on Nov 03, 2009 at 15:18:30
“Because it demonstrates character, that's why. I don't trust a guy who fools around with his own campaign mgr's wife. If you think that's oky, well, that is typical of the left who have no moral compass, except if Repubs. do it, then they are evil.”
A Sad Day for Californians: Gavin Newsom's Withdrawl from the Race for Governor
Commented Nov 01, 2009 at 17:42:42 in Politics
“It's time for neo-Puritans to sail off in a latter-day Mayflower.”
A Sad Day for Californians: Gavin Newsom's Withdrawl from the Race for Governor
Commented Nov 01, 2009 at 17:41:03 in Politics
“I'll take Newsom's courageous and straight forward stand in support of marriage equality over the "separate but equal" rubbish most other Dems, including Obama, have promoted.”
A Sad Day for Californians: Gavin Newsom's Withdrawl from the Race for Governor
Commented Nov 01, 2009 at 17:37:34 in Politics
“Well, voting by age will cut down on the time otherwise spent conducting researching and evaluating candidates' positions on issues.”
On Don't Ask Don't Tell, Army's Ready, So What's the Hold-up?
Commented Oct 31, 2009 at 19:59:47 in Politics
“As Obama said during his HRC address, it's not his business to tell anyone to wait. You might follow his example.”
On Don't Ask Don't Tell, Army's Ready, So What's the Hold-up?
Commented Oct 31, 2009 at 10:15:05 in Politics
“How exactly does ending legally enforced discrimination against the 10 percent harm the 90 percent ?
Your reasoning has no basis in reality.”
Your reasoning has no basis in reality.”
bilmardre replied on Oct 31, 2009 at 11:34:39
“It's politics. Something idealistic liberals have a hard time understanding. It's ugly, but it exists, and if you want to get something done, you must play the game. We have come to this point with your desires unfulfilled. Obama will get it done, but you may have to wait a couple more months. But you guys can continue to say he has no leadership all you want. I will just ask you what your leaders have gotten you up to this point?”
On Don't Ask Don't Tell, Army's Ready, So What's the Hold-up?
Commented Oct 30, 2009 at 21:19:48 in Politics
“Another bathroom moment dedicated to irrational fear and blatant loathing.
Gay men and women have used the same communal showers as everyone else ever since communal showers were first devised. They will continue to use those communal showers as long as communal showers exist.”
Gay men and women have used the same communal showers as everyone else ever since communal showers were first devised. They will continue to use those communal showers as long as communal showers exist.”
Sexting -- Your Kids May Be Doing It
Commented Oct 30, 2009 at 03:43:29 in Living
“Not only aer there horny teenagers on the list. There are gay men on the list who were convicted of consentual sexual relations with other adults prior to the repeal of sodomy laws.
The sex offenders list isn't about protecting the public from people who present a threat to anyone. The list is all about sex-loathing, the latter-day Puritans forcing people to wear updated scarlet letters.”
The sex offenders list isn't about protecting the public from people who present a threat to anyone. The list is all about sex-loathing, the latter-day Puritans forcing people to wear updated scarlet letters.”
Executive Pay Cuts? Hold the Standing Ovation
Commented Oct 23, 2009 at 16:25:06 in Business
“We need to restore the Eisenhower era income tax bracket of 90% on earnings over $1,000,000 per year.”
FistOSalmon replied on Oct 24, 2009 at 12:35:58
“I've never once heard the rise of ceo pay linked to the dropping of marginal tax rates on tv, in print or online. It seems like something you wouldn't have to look up (which I did). The arguments against it seem to be......you shouldn't raise taxes. Even though this simple solution the congress can enact relatively quickly solves this and a number or problems we have with debt and government financing.”
Thedmo replied on Oct 23, 2009 at 17:55:14
“I second the motion.”
Pro-Life Pretense
Commented Oct 23, 2009 at 10:26:07 in Politics
“Keep your church out of other people's crotches, please!”
Is Senator Jeff Sessions Qualified To Be on the Senate Judicary Committee?
Commented Oct 21, 2009 at 20:10:49 in Politics
“That's why I wrote that Jeff Sessions was a Senator from the not-so great State of Reactionary Racism. It transcends conventional survey boundaries.
My best wishes to you and everyone else who is attempting to move Alabama into the present!”
My best wishes to you and everyone else who is attempting to move Alabama into the present!”
Is Senator Jeff Sessions Qualified To Be on the Senate Judicary Committee?
Commented Oct 21, 2009 at 11:47:02 in Politics
“Jeff Sessions is the Senator from the great state of reactionary racism.”
keishalicious replied on Oct 21, 2009 at 13:51:15
“I would agree with you in part. I am from Alabama, and please believe that not all of us are racist, biggoted, redneck and stupid. Don't get me wrong, lots are. There is a large progressive movement forming in Alabama and I am proud to be a part of it. We are made up of all ethnicities and orientations. We are gaining momentum! Alabama - blue state, 2012?? Hopefully!”
Why I'm Optimistic About Maine
Commented Oct 17, 2009 at 22:07:58 in Politics
“Please tell us, exactly what do those who want to deny gay taxpayers equal protection under the law have to gain from denying that protection?”
PDinCA replied on Oct 18, 2009 at 00:25:46
“Wow. It seems to me that equal rights is exactly what this is about. This seems to me exactly like the right of people of different races to marry, which wasn't finally decided until 1967, amazingly.”
TruthJusticeForAll replied on Oct 17, 2009 at 22:27:09
“There is no valid equal rights argument. There is not & will not no matter how loudly you stamp your feet & how long you hold your breath.”
Why I'm Optimistic About Maine
Commented Oct 17, 2009 at 20:53:14 in Politics
“Must every photo selected to illustrate a marriage equality story or a Don't Ask Don't Tell story depict gay people as clowns or transvestites?”
eShirl replied on Oct 18, 2009 at 11:57:53
“Don't insult them, they are a couple of cool old ladies. "Clowns" "transvestites" indeed!”
Brainstormy replied on Oct 18, 2009 at 09:22:56
“That confuses me too. My gay friends dress a lot better than my straight ones. There must be a collection of "royalty free gay photo art" out there somewhere, compiled in the 70s. I do think, though, that the pics of the older ladies look less threatening. You know, to straight married folks, the poor little children.”
truthartbeauty replied on Oct 17, 2009 at 22:32:58
“Honestly, I have gay friends that are medical doctors and body builders.”
Why I'm Optimistic About Maine
Commented Oct 17, 2009 at 19:26:14 in Politics
“My 85 year old Aunt Esther recently remarried. Does anyone need to say more about the theory that marriage is for propagating children?”
SonofLiberty1 replied on Oct 17, 2009 at 21:29:24
“Some married couples are childless...not always because they chose to be childless.”


