Jacksonian's Comments (100)
If It Were Me, I'd Be Embarrassed
Commented Nov 22, 2009 at 18:09:11 in Media
“Don't you just love the word, "perspicacious?"
You bethcha!”
You bethcha!”
If It Were Me, I'd Be Embarrassed
Commented Nov 22, 2009 at 06:53:41 in Media
“In W's case, maybe that's just as well.
:o)
Fanned.”
:o)
Fanned.”
If It Were Me, I'd Be Embarrassed
Commented Nov 22, 2009 at 06:49:53 in Media
“"...she plays the victim and blames everybody but herself."
It sounds as if she has found her ideal role model in Sarah Palin.
This is a thoughtful, well-reasoned, intelligent article complete with excellent analysis. You give us all hope that today's high school seniors are not as vapid, vacuous, and devoid of critical thinking skills as some of Palin's admirers apparently are.
Kudos!”
It sounds as if she has found her ideal role model in Sarah Palin.
This is a thoughtful, well-reasoned, intelligent article complete with excellent analysis. You give us all hope that today's high school seniors are not as vapid, vacuous, and devoid of critical thinking skills as some of Palin's admirers apparently are.
Kudos!”
skatoolaki replied on Nov 22, 2009 at 09:25:40
“I couldn't agree more. I was trying to think of exactly what to say to this intelligent, thoughtful, and perspicacious young man and you said it perfectly; can't improve on it. I concur.
David, you give me hope for the future of this country and the young people coming up in high schools around American today. Namaste, David.”
David, you give me hope for the future of this country and the young people coming up in high schools around American today. Namaste, David.”
Sunday Roundup
Commented Nov 22, 2009 at 04:56:59 in Media
“You're right that he's too dangerous to ignore.
But I still have an overwhelming urge to do so.
:o)”
But I still have an overwhelming urge to do so.
:o)”
Obama One Year Later: The Audacity of Winning vs. The Timidity of Governing
Commented Nov 03, 2009 at 03:39:15 in Politics
“Fanned.”
Obama One Year Later: The Audacity of Winning vs. The Timidity of Governing
Commented Nov 03, 2009 at 03:23:33 in Politics
“Many of the things you list as accomplishments either haven't happened, aren't actual accomplishments, or are more appropriately credited to Congress and not the White House.
Guantanamo Bay remains open and likely will not close by the president's self-imposed deadline; health care reform, on which Obama has waffled shamelessly, appears unlikely to offer much real reform at all; the Matthew Shephard bill has been more than a decade in the making. Obama just happened to be in office for the signing ceremony.
Notwithstanding your rosy view, the stimulous bill in all likelihood was too small and, despite modest gains in some areas, has done almost nothing to rein in unemployment. And the Goldman Sachs - led Treasury Department has utterly failed to close the casino.
Green? Talk to me when meaningful legislation emerges in which the White House has played a critical role.
I admire Justice Sotomayor, but I don't consider presidential appointments to be accomplishments, per se. It would have been stunning for the president, a Constitutional scholar, to appoint a lesser person.
In short, I stand by my statement that you need to put the Kool-Aid down.
And, no, I don't own any tinfoil hats either. I also voted for and supported Obama. That doesn't mean I have abandoned independent observation or independent thought.”
Guantanamo Bay remains open and likely will not close by the president's self-imposed deadline; health care reform, on which Obama has waffled shamelessly, appears unlikely to offer much real reform at all; the Matthew Shephard bill has been more than a decade in the making. Obama just happened to be in office for the signing ceremony.
Notwithstanding your rosy view, the stimulous bill in all likelihood was too small and, despite modest gains in some areas, has done almost nothing to rein in unemployment. And the Goldman Sachs - led Treasury Department has utterly failed to close the casino.
Green? Talk to me when meaningful legislation emerges in which the White House has played a critical role.
I admire Justice Sotomayor, but I don't consider presidential appointments to be accomplishments, per se. It would have been stunning for the president, a Constitutional scholar, to appoint a lesser person.
In short, I stand by my statement that you need to put the Kool-Aid down.
And, no, I don't own any tinfoil hats either. I also voted for and supported Obama. That doesn't mean I have abandoned independent observation or independent thought.”
Harry Lowe replied on Nov 03, 2009 at 03:42:59
“First of all, I think more needs to be done by this president, and I am especially wary of Afpak and gay rights, notwithstanding your hair-trigger koolaid gun. You say he has failed 9 months in with 20 pieces of legislation give-or-take, I say look at what he's accomplished, and I guess that makes me a koolaid drinker and you just an independent thinker.
You're tying yourself in knots, seems to me, trying to give credit to everyone else but not Obama. Gitmo is closing, it's proving harder than expected, but it will close, there was green in the stimulus if you look for it (funding for giant solar and wind farms, smart grids, etc.). And the Matt Shepard act actually was controversial, Obama made it look relatively easy.
But there I go buying the propaganda again.”
You're tying yourself in knots, seems to me, trying to give credit to everyone else but not Obama. Gitmo is closing, it's proving harder than expected, but it will close, there was green in the stimulus if you look for it (funding for giant solar and wind farms, smart grids, etc.). And the Matt Shepard act actually was controversial, Obama made it look relatively easy.
But there I go buying the propaganda again.”
Obama One Year Later: The Audacity of Winning vs. The Timidity of Governing
Commented Nov 03, 2009 at 02:56:39 in Politics
“Dump the Kool-Aid down the drain, Harry.
It's completely unfair to equate hsko1945's legitimate criticism with the nutcases in tinfoil hats.
And as for all those "things (Obama's) accomplished?" I'm still looking for them.”
It's completely unfair to equate hsko1945's legitimate criticism with the nutcases in tinfoil hats.
And as for all those "things (Obama's) accomplished?" I'm still looking for them.”
Harry Lowe replied on Nov 03, 2009 at 03:34:01
“one more thing: I find it puzzling that you would call someone stating the fact that he's passed around 20 significant pieces of legislation (yes, they were on his agenda too) a kool-aid drinker.
Looking at the comments here about Obama being owned by banks and failing, a deep breath and a bit of perspective are needed.”
Looking at the comments here about Obama being owned by banks and failing, a deep breath and a bit of perspective are needed.”
Harry Lowe replied on Nov 03, 2009 at 03:03:53
“no kool-aid here. It's been posted multiple times already. Ledbetter, Shepard, green, health and infrastructure in stimulus, about to pass healthcare, gitmo closing, Iraq ending late 2011 with significant withdrawals already, economy from 6.5% decline to 3.5 % growth, 90% global approval rating, Franken amendment, Sotomayor, F-22, pres. helicopter, and cargo plane programs, ban on torture.
The only thing you will claim is progress is a progressive utopia. Utopias don't happen. Ever. Anywhere. Don't dismiss this pres. like he hasn't already gotten a lot accomplished. And if you want somewhere to look, go to politifact.com.”
The only thing you will claim is progress is a progressive utopia. Utopias don't happen. Ever. Anywhere. Don't dismiss this pres. like he hasn't already gotten a lot accomplished. And if you want somewhere to look, go to politifact.com.”
NJ Law Enforcement Appear to Contradict Dobbs' Version of Gunfire Incident
Commented Oct 30, 2009 at 18:39:18 in Media
“LMFAO.”
Barack Obama Is Doing My Job; Why America Needs Him to Do His
Commented Oct 30, 2009 at 18:24:14 in Business
“Which one of us isn't paying attention?
He has embraced Bush's surveillance tactics; he has expanded illegal detention; he has refused to authorize torture investigations.
He has put Wall Street in charge of the Treasury Department; he has permitted excessive bonuses and executive pay; he has offered no serious regulatory reform of our financial markets; he has not provided effective mortgage relief; he has backed corporations over the people.
He has waffled on the public option; he has sold out to pharmaceutical companies; he has conducted health care reform in an opaque fashion; he has put the concerns of Olympia Snowe and Joe Liberman ahead of his constituents; he as engaged in a pointless, self-defeating exercise in bipartisanship with a party that is out of power, generally marginalized, and fading fast.
He has escalated troop deployment in Afghanistan; he has failed to close GITMO; and he has procrastinated in ending "Don't ask - Don't tell."
In short he's been less about change than he has been about typical Beltway politics.
I voted for him too. I cheered his historic election. I find him, his family, even his dog, immensely likeable. But I never liked Kool-Aid, don't wear rose-colored glasses, and refuse to cede my right to independent thought.
I'm not looking for a magic wand. I'm just looking for the guy I helped to elect.”
He has embraced Bush's surveillance tactics; he has expanded illegal detention; he has refused to authorize torture investigations.
He has put Wall Street in charge of the Treasury Department; he has permitted excessive bonuses and executive pay; he has offered no serious regulatory reform of our financial markets; he has not provided effective mortgage relief; he has backed corporations over the people.
He has waffled on the public option; he has sold out to pharmaceutical companies; he has conducted health care reform in an opaque fashion; he has put the concerns of Olympia Snowe and Joe Liberman ahead of his constituents; he as engaged in a pointless, self-defeating exercise in bipartisanship with a party that is out of power, generally marginalized, and fading fast.
He has escalated troop deployment in Afghanistan; he has failed to close GITMO; and he has procrastinated in ending "Don't ask - Don't tell."
In short he's been less about change than he has been about typical Beltway politics.
I voted for him too. I cheered his historic election. I find him, his family, even his dog, immensely likeable. But I never liked Kool-Aid, don't wear rose-colored glasses, and refuse to cede my right to independent thought.
I'm not looking for a magic wand. I'm just looking for the guy I helped to elect.”
LaSirene replied on Nov 02, 2009 at 15:17:27
“Amen. Took the words right out of my mouth.”
xmissile replied on Nov 01, 2009 at 23:27:14
“This guy is trying to please too many people and be the great unifier, and consequently, everyone is running roughshod over him. Case in point. The Israelis have actually accelerated settlement construction and expansion. He caved in to mountaintop coal removal for freak sake. Turned his back on GLBTI. Where are all the permits for offshore wind farms like Cape Wind? Would someone please cite one modicum of concrete change that is in line with a campaign promise (other than stem cells)?
This would all make sense if he were a double agent for the Republican party.”
This would all make sense if he were a double agent for the Republican party.”
Emmory replied on Nov 01, 2009 at 10:56:46
“Finally some of you are seeing what is going on here!
This is exactly what I was worried about when everyone was so gung ho to get Obama elected.
He has no answers now because he never has in his entire political life.
This will not change...
He will not change...
We need to all wake up and start thinking clearly and logically about all the problems we face both in the rest of the world and here at home.
Guys like Obama and Bush will not take care of us.
They never have.”
This is exactly what I was worried about when everyone was so gung ho to get Obama elected.
He has no answers now because he never has in his entire political life.
This will not change...
He will not change...
We need to all wake up and start thinking clearly and logically about all the problems we face both in the rest of the world and here at home.
Guys like Obama and Bush will not take care of us.
They never have.”
wheresthetruth replied on Nov 01, 2009 at 10:32:53
“You wrote what I was going to write.”
Barack Obama Is Doing My Job; Why America Needs Him to Do His
Commented Oct 27, 2009 at 13:32:30 in Business
“What's all that different about Obama and the Republicans? He's just as willing as Bush was to abuse his executive powers. He's just as willing to side with corporations. He's just as willing to opt for political expediency in lieu of keeping his promises.
Why are there no torture investigations? Why does he advocate rendition? Why does he support warrantless wiretapping? Why is Wall Street still running the Treasury Department? Where is the regulation, where is the reform, where are the investigations, where are the prosecutions of the thieves who nearly destroyed the world's economy, who robbed us of our 401ks, and who profited off our bailout?
You say the Democrats always find a way to put the Republicans in office? I say what's the difference? It looks like that's exactly what we did.”
Why are there no torture investigations? Why does he advocate rendition? Why does he support warrantless wiretapping? Why is Wall Street still running the Treasury Department? Where is the regulation, where is the reform, where are the investigations, where are the prosecutions of the thieves who nearly destroyed the world's economy, who robbed us of our 401ks, and who profited off our bailout?
You say the Democrats always find a way to put the Republicans in office? I say what's the difference? It looks like that's exactly what we did.”
Barack Obama Is Doing My Job; Why America Needs Him to Do His
Commented Oct 27, 2009 at 01:23:55 in Business
“Sadly I realized several months ago that the president is a weak leader, if he's much of a leader at all.
Combine that with the fact that he lacks the courage of his convictions, and it leaves those of us who voted for him in a quandary.
What do we do in 2012 when Obama is almost surely going to be the Democratic nominee? Do we hold our noses and vote for him anyway, as John McCain's mother might put it?
Do we find a third-party candidate and hand the election to the Republicans?
Maybe we need to start thinking right now about backing someone new for the Democratic party. Someone who really is what Obama purported to be.”
Combine that with the fact that he lacks the courage of his convictions, and it leaves those of us who voted for him in a quandary.
What do we do in 2012 when Obama is almost surely going to be the Democratic nominee? Do we hold our noses and vote for him anyway, as John McCain's mother might put it?
Do we find a third-party candidate and hand the election to the Republicans?
Maybe we need to start thinking right now about backing someone new for the Democratic party. Someone who really is what Obama purported to be.”
KKojei replied on Oct 30, 2009 at 12:35:08
“Another one not paying attention. Since this President has been in office, unheard and undreamed of initiatives protective of American consumers, financial systems and the rights not only of American citizens but even so-called enemy combatants have been undertaken. For the first time in history we are steps away from the beginning of a health care system that isn't predatory and monstrously greedy. We are up against entrenched forces that have been that way MOST if not all of our lives. Yet folks expect a magic wand to fix problems you contributed with laisse faire "as long as it doesn't affect me" attitudes until the crap got up to nose level??
He warned us it would not be easy.
"I'm not a miracle worker. We've got a lot of tough choices and hard decisions and hard work ahead of us," Obama said. "I want to warn you, there will be setbacks. It will take time."
"On our first day in office we found challenges of unprecedented size and scope," Obama said.
"These challenges could not be met with half-measures. They couldn't be confronted in isolation. They demanded action that was bold and sustained."
This is not some NBA game. This is real life with real consequences. Water seems to be weak, yet it can penetrate nearly anything. It flows between your fingers but it will wash away whole civilizations, It cleans, nourishes and transforms. Is it weak? Hardly!!!!!”
He warned us it would not be easy.
"I'm not a miracle worker. We've got a lot of tough choices and hard decisions and hard work ahead of us," Obama said. "I want to warn you, there will be setbacks. It will take time."
"On our first day in office we found challenges of unprecedented size and scope," Obama said.
"These challenges could not be met with half-measures. They couldn't be confronted in isolation. They demanded action that was bold and sustained."
This is not some NBA game. This is real life with real consequences. Water seems to be weak, yet it can penetrate nearly anything. It flows between your fingers but it will wash away whole civilizations, It cleans, nourishes and transforms. Is it weak? Hardly!!!!!”
mollie100 replied on Oct 27, 2009 at 12:44:14
“Somehow the left always finds a way to put the Republicans in office. Pres Obama hasn't been in office 10 months and you've written him off. Not to fret though, the Republicans will be back in power soon.”
OrangeCatholic replied on Oct 27, 2009 at 05:34:32
“Maybe we should be patient.
Consider how easily Obama's presidency can eclipse Bill Clinton's. Clinton, by all regards an effective leader, was also the dimwit who repealed the Glass-Steagall Act, set the dot-com economy into "irrational exuberance", and was embarrassed to be caught with an intern.
Do you see Obama making any of these pitfalls?
Consider what "patience" has done for the health care "public option." It seems to be back from the dead. In an economy as messed up as ours, time can heal many wounds.”
Consider how easily Obama's presidency can eclipse Bill Clinton's. Clinton, by all regards an effective leader, was also the dimwit who repealed the Glass-Steagall Act, set the dot-com economy into "irrational exuberance", and was embarrassed to be caught with an intern.
Do you see Obama making any of these pitfalls?
Consider what "patience" has done for the health care "public option." It seems to be back from the dead. In an economy as messed up as ours, time can heal many wounds.”
Why is Harry Reid Covering Up a Secret Senate Filibuster?
Commented Oct 26, 2009 at 13:20:25 in Politics
“The voters of Nevada.”
Why is Harry Reid Covering Up a Secret Senate Filibuster?
Commented Oct 25, 2009 at 01:50:08 in Politics
“From the president on down, Democrats have taken a peculiar route to health care reform.
While the "party of no" largely remains silent, it is, incredibly, the Democrats who are sabotaging the legislation -- their own legislation.
They eagerly seek whatever cover they can find to hesitate, to defer, to delay, to water down, to dismiss. They talk about 60 votes, knowing they need 51. They talk about bipartisanship, knowing it's virtually unattainable and mostly irrelevant. They float enough phony trial balloons to fill Colorado's skies.
You'd think the G.O.P. was still calling the shots.
I've spent six months signing petitions and calling my Congressional delegation, and I've eagerly read every word I came across about the health care issue. I've sweated every premature declaration of the public option's death and alternately cursed and cheered the president I helped to elect.
It's as if the Democrats, beholden to corporations but seeking electoral cover, are tossing around a hot potato, refusing to take credit either for promoting the public option or for killing it. But all indications are that they really don't want to pass meaningful reform.
Why don't they pressure their caucus members? Why don't they threaten to revoke chairmanships? Why don't they name names?
Why pass weak and meaningless legislation? Make the republicans filibuster. Let America see what they really stand for.
My biggest question, though, is why did I vote for these people?
And why would I repeat that mistake?”
While the "party of no" largely remains silent, it is, incredibly, the Democrats who are sabotaging the legislation -- their own legislation.
They eagerly seek whatever cover they can find to hesitate, to defer, to delay, to water down, to dismiss. They talk about 60 votes, knowing they need 51. They talk about bipartisanship, knowing it's virtually unattainable and mostly irrelevant. They float enough phony trial balloons to fill Colorado's skies.
You'd think the G.O.P. was still calling the shots.
I've spent six months signing petitions and calling my Congressional delegation, and I've eagerly read every word I came across about the health care issue. I've sweated every premature declaration of the public option's death and alternately cursed and cheered the president I helped to elect.
It's as if the Democrats, beholden to corporations but seeking electoral cover, are tossing around a hot potato, refusing to take credit either for promoting the public option or for killing it. But all indications are that they really don't want to pass meaningful reform.
Why don't they pressure their caucus members? Why don't they threaten to revoke chairmanships? Why don't they name names?
Why pass weak and meaningless legislation? Make the republicans filibuster. Let America see what they really stand for.
My biggest question, though, is why did I vote for these people?
And why would I repeat that mistake?”
oliv0128 replied on Oct 26, 2009 at 12:32:32
“I wholeheartedly agree with what you say. Pelosi put reps. on record about where they stand on the public option, so should Reid. It certainly does seem like (some of) the Dems are intentionally looking for any excuse to thwart this bill. Maybe not in terms of whether it eventually passes, but certainly in terms of how effective it will be. Who do we pressure to get the Dems to change senate majority leader?”
psychodog replied on Oct 25, 2009 at 15:12:59
“"While the "party of no" largely remains silent, it is, incredibly, the Democrats who are sabotaging the legislation -- their own legislation."
--------------------------
You need to consider the fact that there are very few Republicans that are moderate or simply 'conservative'... they're occupying mostly the 'far-right' position.
That leaves Democrats to span the spectrum from far-left to right-of-center, and that's why you're seeing Democrats debating amongst themselves.”
--------------------------
You need to consider the fact that there are very few Republicans that are moderate or simply 'conservative'... they're occupying mostly the 'far-right' position.
That leaves Democrats to span the spectrum from far-left to right-of-center, and that's why you're seeing Democrats debating amongst themselves.”
How About a Little Coverage of the Millions of At-Risk Kids Not Trapped in a Balloon (or Hiding in the Attic)?
Commented Oct 19, 2009 at 19:37:16 in Media
“They get it, Arianna.
They just don't care.”
They just don't care.”
Insurance Industry Declares Open War on Reform: They Promise to Raise Their Rates If Reform Passes
Commented Oct 13, 2009 at 00:20:29 in Politics
“Of course -- which is why I prefaced my remarks by dissing conspiracy theories.
But I find the whole thing bewildering nonetheless.”
But I find the whole thing bewildering nonetheless.”
Americans Are Still Delusional About House Prices
Commented Oct 13, 2009 at 00:08:03 in Business
“My husband's a lawyer, and our kids grown, so with no mortgage-interest deduction and no dependents (apparently we cannot claim four spoiled cats and a golden retriever), we have really been hurting at tax time.
So he said we should become home owners again.
Frankly I also like not having to worry about what the landlord will say when I pound a nail in the wall or paint a room.
This isn't to say there aren't lots of perks to renting: My husband's not nearly so keen on home ownership when it comes to repairs or lawn maintenance.
:o)”
So he said we should become home owners again.
Frankly I also like not having to worry about what the landlord will say when I pound a nail in the wall or paint a room.
This isn't to say there aren't lots of perks to renting: My husband's not nearly so keen on home ownership when it comes to repairs or lawn maintenance.
:o)”
Insurance Industry Declares Open War on Reform: They Promise to Raise Their Rates If Reform Passes
Commented Oct 12, 2009 at 23:56:20 in Politics
“I'm not normally a conspiracy theorist of any kind, and I'm loath to imply such here, but couldn't this 11th-hour pushback from the insurance industry just be a way to give cover to Obama and the Democrats when they pass meaningless health care reform?
Why else would Max Baucus, the industry's $3 million point man, suddenly take umbrage with his favorite benefactor's behavior?
He's upset that the industry is threatening higher premiums EVEN AS THEY REVEL in the spoils of their decade-long gouge fest?
He bristles at the idea that CBO estimates of his gutless, worthless bill are wrong and that the measure won't, in fact, drive down health insurance costs?
Of course it won't. It was never designed to do so. It was designed to do the opposite.
It was designed to seem frugal even as it opened lucrative markets to insurers through mandatory insurance premiums and even as it set Americans up for increased costs down the road when what passes as reform reveals itself to be simply more of the same.
But what if this last-minute complaining from Big Insurance is by design too?
By lining up against the bill, the industry gives Obama someone to point to as he deflects criticism that this is nothing more than watered-down legislation masquerading as reform. The president gets his second term; the C.E.O.s get to keep their profits and their bonuses; and the American public gets screwed.
Talk about your flawed designs...”
Why else would Max Baucus, the industry's $3 million point man, suddenly take umbrage with his favorite benefactor's behavior?
He's upset that the industry is threatening higher premiums EVEN AS THEY REVEL in the spoils of their decade-long gouge fest?
He bristles at the idea that CBO estimates of his gutless, worthless bill are wrong and that the measure won't, in fact, drive down health insurance costs?
Of course it won't. It was never designed to do so. It was designed to do the opposite.
It was designed to seem frugal even as it opened lucrative markets to insurers through mandatory insurance premiums and even as it set Americans up for increased costs down the road when what passes as reform reveals itself to be simply more of the same.
But what if this last-minute complaining from Big Insurance is by design too?
By lining up against the bill, the industry gives Obama someone to point to as he deflects criticism that this is nothing more than watered-down legislation masquerading as reform. The president gets his second term; the C.E.O.s get to keep their profits and their bonuses; and the American public gets screwed.
Talk about your flawed designs...”
WorkingClass replied on Oct 14, 2009 at 13:14:09
“Why else would Max Baucus, the industry's $3 million point man, suddenly take umbrage with his favorite benefactor's behavior?
I don't believe any of it. Its just another exercise in perception management.”
I don't believe any of it. Its just another exercise in perception management.”
rick91 replied on Oct 13, 2009 at 00:12:00
“I do see a lot of flaws in your conspiracy theory.”
Americans Are Still Delusional About House Prices
Commented Oct 12, 2009 at 22:06:31 in Business
“My husband and I moved from Minnesota to Missouri in 2007 and rented for the first two years we were here.
But without a real estate tax deduction, we were getting killed every April.
This year we finally bought a house down here and are happy with what we thought was a good deal on the property as well as some long-term tax relief.
Our 21-year-old son got a great deal on a foreclosed townhouse back in Minnesota, plus he gets an $8,000 tax credit.
We expect to stay in our home long term, and the terms of our son's tax credit require him to stay a minimum of three years.
So there are plenty of good reasons to buy and plenty of good deals. But if you view your purchase as some sort of road to riches, you're going to be disappointed.
Just try to enjoy your new home sweet home.”
But without a real estate tax deduction, we were getting killed every April.
This year we finally bought a house down here and are happy with what we thought was a good deal on the property as well as some long-term tax relief.
Our 21-year-old son got a great deal on a foreclosed townhouse back in Minnesota, plus he gets an $8,000 tax credit.
We expect to stay in our home long term, and the terms of our son's tax credit require him to stay a minimum of three years.
So there are plenty of good reasons to buy and plenty of good deals. But if you view your purchase as some sort of road to riches, you're going to be disappointed.
Just try to enjoy your new home sweet home.”
gmundenat replied on Oct 12, 2009 at 22:22:20
“How much better did you do at tax time? Is that number larger than the interest you paid on the loan + tax + insurance? That said, if you're there for a long time, it could work for you and I hope it does. If your mortgage has no penalty for early payment, you could benefit tremendously buy paying extra each month.”
Sunday Roundup
Commented Oct 04, 2009 at 04:17:25 in World
“For 40 years, the G.O.P. has been the party of bad ideas.
Now it's become the party of no ideas.
Republicans express these non-ideas with the subtlety of a spoiled, petulant two-year-old, the openmindedness of a stubborn, contrary teenager, and the intellectual verve of an old racist, xenophobic redneck.”
Now it's become the party of no ideas.
Republicans express these non-ideas with the subtlety of a spoiled, petulant two-year-old, the openmindedness of a stubborn, contrary teenager, and the intellectual verve of an old racist, xenophobic redneck.”
Sunday Roundup
Commented Sep 27, 2009 at 03:44:07 in Politics
“They mostly just leave me wanting to pull my hair out at the roots.
Sigh.”
Sigh.”
Jason Linkins Discusses Czars On MSNBC: "Nothing To Do With Russian Imperialism"
Commented Sep 17, 2009 at 20:07:03 in Politics
“Ditto”
Jason Linkins Discusses Czars On MSNBC: "Nothing To Do With Russian Imperialism"
Commented Sep 17, 2009 at 20:05:20 in Politics
“Yesterday I nominated Jason for the post of "Comedy Czar," a parliamentary move which received a quick second (and third), and one for which we expect swift presidential approval.
Today, in honor of Jason's MSNBC appearance, which was GREAT, I offer my own services up as "Zombie Czar," inspired as I was by the monotone and almost-lifelike presentation of his conservative counterpart. (This is not to be confused with, nor to detract from, my work with the Zombie Anti-Defamation League.)
Today's political confrontations with the living dead brought to you by the Missouri chapter of the Shiba Inu Puppy Livestream Fan Club.”
Today, in honor of Jason's MSNBC appearance, which was GREAT, I offer my own services up as "Zombie Czar," inspired as I was by the monotone and almost-lifelike presentation of his conservative counterpart. (This is not to be confused with, nor to detract from, my work with the Zombie Anti-Defamation League.)
Today's political confrontations with the living dead brought to you by the Missouri chapter of the Shiba Inu Puppy Livestream Fan Club.”
New TIME Cover on Glenn Beck Ignores Facts, and Worse
Commented Sep 17, 2009 at 11:48:37 in Media
“It's TIME, Greg.
Nuff said.”
Nuff said.”


