Lucille's Comments (53)
Pyrrhic Victoria: Why Men Are Becoming More Like Women
Commented Nov 21, 2009 at 18:11:51 in Living
“Congradulatlions, I know your boyfriend is estatic that you've choosen to take the garbage out and add another chore to life and have taken one less chore away from him. Enjoy!”
Pyrrhic Victoria: Why Men Are Becoming More Like Women
Commented Nov 19, 2009 at 13:16:39 in Living
“I can and I do expect "help", as you put it, with stereotypical female roles and still maintain that real men did all the things my father did. Personally, I think prescribed gender roles worked just fine, the issues feminism was supposed to address were: pay equity; domestic violence; equal access to credit and education; reproductive choices, just to name a few things. Yet feminism went too far with the theory of "equality.” Of course each gender deserves equal rights but men seem very eager to forget that men and women are not the same; and society is currently paying the consequences.
Really, women are looking for opened minded but “traditional” men, no matter what the feminist say; and the statistics show, women are choosing to do opt out of marriage, why? Why do men remarry at twice the rate of divorced married women? Obviously married life in this modern age is better for men, but not so much for women.
Regarding feminism, domestically, women have been hoisted by their own petard.”
Really, women are looking for opened minded but “traditional” men, no matter what the feminist say; and the statistics show, women are choosing to do opt out of marriage, why? Why do men remarry at twice the rate of divorced married women? Obviously married life in this modern age is better for men, but not so much for women.
Regarding feminism, domestically, women have been hoisted by their own petard.”
bmonaghan replied on Nov 20, 2009 at 09:55:20
“My boyfriend once joked - For all this and that, I have never once lived with a woman who took out the garbage. So, just to spite him, I began taking it out. Trust me, it's not that difficult.”
spaceghost06 replied on Nov 19, 2009 at 19:12:06
“The biggest issue in general that feminism addressed was choice. Feminism opened up many different opportunities and lifestyle choices that were denied to women earlier. This is a good thing. I think it would be a good thing for men too but it seems as if women prefer to have men behave in a certain stereotypical way.
What is 'going too far with the theory of equality'?
How do men forget that men and women aren't the same?
What do you mean when you say an open minded but 'traditional' man?
How is married life in the modern age better for men? What types of tangible benefits do men get out of marriage that they couldn't get otherwise? What made 'old school' marriage better for women (as you seem to imply, if I'm wrong, tell me)
In my circles it seems like women aren't opting out as much as they aren't being considered. I know more women who want to be married but aren't than men who want to be married but can't find a mate. Maybe men remarry more because they are considered more attractive than a divorced woman. Maybe women don't get remarried because they would lose alimony.”
What is 'going too far with the theory of equality'?
How do men forget that men and women aren't the same?
What do you mean when you say an open minded but 'traditional' man?
How is married life in the modern age better for men? What types of tangible benefits do men get out of marriage that they couldn't get otherwise? What made 'old school' marriage better for women (as you seem to imply, if I'm wrong, tell me)
In my circles it seems like women aren't opting out as much as they aren't being considered. I know more women who want to be married but aren't than men who want to be married but can't find a mate. Maybe men remarry more because they are considered more attractive than a divorced woman. Maybe women don't get remarried because they would lose alimony.”
Pyrrhic Victoria: Why Men Are Becoming More Like Women
Commented Nov 19, 2009 at 00:17:35 in Living
“Ugh, American men seem pretty useless by the standards of my parents; mainly men whine too much today. They argue about taking out the garbage. I'm told by younger women that men say "it's your turn", huh? My father never asked my mother to take out the garbage; or wash the windows; the car; Daddy did it without being asked.
Men today are more in the mirror today than women, what do they call them "metrosexual" or something; Yuk. And men today are rude they have no manners at all, yet I have to concede that’s women’s fault because many women disrespect themselves, in so many ways today, that they’ve made it extremely difficult for other women who still have standards.
In addition, men today are so effeminate; I sometimes can't tell the difference anymore. Honestly, I have a little, thin neighbor covered in black clothing, Gothic style, and I swear I don't know which it is, male or female.
Also men today are conniving. I read a posting in another venue that said, men: search for women with high paying jobs; get her pregnant and work only part time; then file for divorce; get joint custody and child support. Was this what the Women's Liberation Movement was for? No wonder the birth rates in western industrialized countries are going down, and increasingly women in these countries (over 50% in America), are opting to stay single.”
Men today are more in the mirror today than women, what do they call them "metrosexual" or something; Yuk. And men today are rude they have no manners at all, yet I have to concede that’s women’s fault because many women disrespect themselves, in so many ways today, that they’ve made it extremely difficult for other women who still have standards.
In addition, men today are so effeminate; I sometimes can't tell the difference anymore. Honestly, I have a little, thin neighbor covered in black clothing, Gothic style, and I swear I don't know which it is, male or female.
Also men today are conniving. I read a posting in another venue that said, men: search for women with high paying jobs; get her pregnant and work only part time; then file for divorce; get joint custody and child support. Was this what the Women's Liberation Movement was for? No wonder the birth rates in western industrialized countries are going down, and increasingly women in these countries (over 50% in America), are opting to stay single.”
Marklar replied on Nov 20, 2009 at 01:52:03
“You are a sexist.”
spaceghost06 replied on Nov 19, 2009 at 07:39:56
“Let's try a thought experiment changing the gender of your first paragraph
"Ugh, American women seem pretty useless by the standards of my parents; mainly women whine too much today. They argue about cooking dinner. I'm told by younger men that women say "it's your turn", huh? My mother never asked my father to cook dinner; or wash clothes; iron; Mommy did it without being asked."
Yes, in previous generations the mother worked outside the home as well. (at least in my family they did)
In response to your last paragraph, I know too many men going through that situation right now with women.
"Was this what the Women's Liberation Movement was for?"
With every bit of progress there are always unintended consequences. To quote Spiderman's uncle, 'With power (freedom) comes great responsibility.' As women you are now learning about some of the responsibilities that men have that went unspoken, were understood and just 'taken care of' that you never had to worry about because of prescribed gender roles. Contrary to popular belief our lives never just consisted of leaving the house to go to a job we love, coming home, sitting on the couch with a beer and watching the game all night. You have been sold a bill of goods if you believe that. Getting rid of prescribed gender roles is fine with me, but you can't expect 'help' with stereotypical female roles and say 'real men' do all the things my father/grandfather did.”
"Ugh, American women seem pretty useless by the standards of my parents; mainly women whine too much today. They argue about cooking dinner. I'm told by younger men that women say "it's your turn", huh? My mother never asked my father to cook dinner; or wash clothes; iron; Mommy did it without being asked."
Yes, in previous generations the mother worked outside the home as well. (at least in my family they did)
In response to your last paragraph, I know too many men going through that situation right now with women.
"Was this what the Women's Liberation Movement was for?"
With every bit of progress there are always unintended consequences. To quote Spiderman's uncle, 'With power (freedom) comes great responsibility.' As women you are now learning about some of the responsibilities that men have that went unspoken, were understood and just 'taken care of' that you never had to worry about because of prescribed gender roles. Contrary to popular belief our lives never just consisted of leaving the house to go to a job we love, coming home, sitting on the couch with a beer and watching the game all night. You have been sold a bill of goods if you believe that. Getting rid of prescribed gender roles is fine with me, but you can't expect 'help' with stereotypical female roles and say 'real men' do all the things my father/grandfather did.”
Media Fail: Kimberly Munley Did Not Bring Down Fort Hood Killer
Commented Nov 12, 2009 at 19:28:54 in Media
“Ditto.”
Don't Forget To Have Kids
Commented Nov 09, 2009 at 21:30:34 in Living
“Most women married or not still do the majority of household chores and child-raising. Many women choose to have children without a husband and are very happy, and so are their children.
Some people try making single motherhood a stigma but so many women and children are better off that way. If the man has never been in the children's lives at least there are no custody battles; and there is always the sperm bank or a friend who is willing to give up his parental rights for a sperm donation.
I know plenty of professional women who have their careers but no husband and both, they and their children, have very happy and active lives. I don't think being a single mother (if you have the financial resources) is particularly difficult at all, but admittedly one must have the temperament to be a parent in general.”
Some people try making single motherhood a stigma but so many women and children are better off that way. If the man has never been in the children's lives at least there are no custody battles; and there is always the sperm bank or a friend who is willing to give up his parental rights for a sperm donation.
I know plenty of professional women who have their careers but no husband and both, they and their children, have very happy and active lives. I don't think being a single mother (if you have the financial resources) is particularly difficult at all, but admittedly one must have the temperament to be a parent in general.”
mydwyf replied on Nov 10, 2009 at 17:21:28
“And yet the first of the grown-up sperm donor babies are starting to speak out about
what is missing in their lives . . .
Not to mention that a turkey baster conception is completely different on an energetic
level from a conscious sexual conception between two compatible and loving partners.
I cannot imagine allowing my eggs to be fertilized by anonymous and unknown frozen sperm.
How in the world would I know if I was biologically and energetically compatible with the donor ?”
what is missing in their lives . . .
Not to mention that a turkey baster conception is completely different on an energetic
level from a conscious sexual conception between two compatible and loving partners.
I cannot imagine allowing my eggs to be fertilized by anonymous and unknown frozen sperm.
How in the world would I know if I was biologically and energetically compatible with the donor ?”
Don't Forget To Have Kids
Commented Nov 09, 2009 at 21:15:04 in Living
“To Lemonashes, Great answer to your girls, I agree with you completely.”
dozaa replied on Nov 09, 2009 at 22:12:04
“Yay. One person with common sense.
The world population has quadrupled, yes quadrupled, in the last 100 years. And yet 90% of the women I know don't think twice about wanting children. They talk about adopting but fall in love with the idea of their own DNA and several I know have spent thousands and thousands of dollars using the feritility voodoo of in vitro etc. ot have their own.
Personally, I feel that at least 1/2 the women who have children do so A) because its the only creative thing they've ever done and B) they get bored with themselves. c) it's an insurance policy.”
The world population has quadrupled, yes quadrupled, in the last 100 years. And yet 90% of the women I know don't think twice about wanting children. They talk about adopting but fall in love with the idea of their own DNA and several I know have spent thousands and thousands of dollars using the feritility voodoo of in vitro etc. ot have their own.
Personally, I feel that at least 1/2 the women who have children do so A) because its the only creative thing they've ever done and B) they get bored with themselves. c) it's an insurance policy.”
Can a Stepmother Like Sandra Bullock Be a Better Parent than a Biological Mom Who's a Porn Star?
Commented Nov 09, 2009 at 16:06:24 in Living
“From what I've read in other articles the state the father had not seen the child in her first 3 years of her life, as of yet, has not been disputed by him or his current wife (Bullock's is his 3rd marriage), none of the articles say whether or not his absence was due to as you say "his own indifference."
Ms. Lindermulder was on Good Morning America alleging that Bullock and her husband wrote letters to the judge stating that Ms. Lindermulder hadn't served enough time in prison, for tax evasion, for their liking, and if that's true than that's unconscionable and shows their lack of fitness in this matter, and thus far that allegation has gone undisputed by the father and Ms. Bullock as well.
Yea without sin cast the first stone.”
Ms. Lindermulder was on Good Morning America alleging that Bullock and her husband wrote letters to the judge stating that Ms. Lindermulder hadn't served enough time in prison, for tax evasion, for their liking, and if that's true than that's unconscionable and shows their lack of fitness in this matter, and thus far that allegation has gone undisputed by the father and Ms. Bullock as well.
Yea without sin cast the first stone.”
alenaspoppa replied on Nov 10, 2009 at 18:06:45
“It appears to me that you were inexplicably moved by Ms. Lindermulder's interview, which is exactly why she went on GMA. I'm still not buying that her side of the story is the credible one. My parents have met Sandra Bullock many times when she's been at her home on Tybee Island in Georgia, and from their experiences with her she's a very down to earth person who doesn't fit with the description being painted by Ms. Lindermulder's side of the story.”
Can a Stepmother Like Sandra Bullock Be a Better Parent than a Biological Mom Who's a Porn Star?
Commented Nov 09, 2009 at 13:41:28 in Living
“Zipolked I agree completely with you.”
Can a Stepmother Like Sandra Bullock Be a Better Parent than a Biological Mom Who's a Porn Star?
Commented Nov 09, 2009 at 13:39:06 in Living
“Whatever happened in your circumstance has NOTHING to do with Ms. Lindermulder as a mother. The proof is in the pudding. No one took Ms. Lindemulder’s child from her, because there was no cause to do so. Obviously going to jail for 6 months for tax evasion disabled Ms. Lindermulder from caring for child whom she raised beautiful heretofore; so the father and Ms. Bullock did the right thing by stepping in for 6 months (I read elsewhere the father hadn’t even seen the child for the first 3 years of her life).
Why should Ms. Lindermulder give up her child to someone who "thinks" they can do better? Porn star or not Ms. Lindermulder has done just fine and evidently raised a beautiful and healthy child with little help from Bullock and her husband before she went to jail. Now they are being opportunistic and throwing Bullock’s money around and even Ms. McLeod (a woman who went to high school with Bullock and apparently is a blogger here) has responded in this very blog in Bullock’s favor; yet Ms. McLeod doesn’t know Ms. Lindermulder or her child and that’s sick.
Who are these people who think its o.k. to trade other people’s children because they have more material wealth and influence? Be sure that money and influence is driving this.”
Why should Ms. Lindermulder give up her child to someone who "thinks" they can do better? Porn star or not Ms. Lindermulder has done just fine and evidently raised a beautiful and healthy child with little help from Bullock and her husband before she went to jail. Now they are being opportunistic and throwing Bullock’s money around and even Ms. McLeod (a woman who went to high school with Bullock and apparently is a blogger here) has responded in this very blog in Bullock’s favor; yet Ms. McLeod doesn’t know Ms. Lindermulder or her child and that’s sick.
Who are these people who think its o.k. to trade other people’s children because they have more material wealth and influence? Be sure that money and influence is driving this.”
alenaspoppa replied on Nov 09, 2009 at 15:00:59
“You're right. However, see my other post about being raised by my father. Those two points together inform my point of view. You're making assumptions about Bullock and her husband based on unsubstantiated reports (unless you have some sort of documentation that says the father didn't see the child for the first three years of her life and that was due to his own indifference). You're also leaping to the conclusion that courts would give the child to her father just because Bullock is a movie star. Most courts don't work that way. If you're right, and the father wasn't interested in the child until Bullock got involved, then it's likely that an intelligent judge would rule in favor of the mother, because the vast majority of custody cases still rule in favor of the mother.”
jp5472 replied on Nov 09, 2009 at 14:25:43
“Thanks for the great background info and your cogent points. Knowing the whole story certainly changes one's perspective (or should). Tax evasion is not a reason for a child to be taken from her mother. That the father took no interest in this child for three years prior is extremely important...and that Ms Lindermulder has been ordered not to be in porn anymore, has been off drugs since before her child was born (and can be tested if the court decides that is an issue that needs to be watched).”
Can a Stepmother Like Sandra Bullock Be a Better Parent than a Biological Mom Who's a Porn Star?
Commented Nov 09, 2009 at 11:54:35 in Living
“Children's Services has not found the natural mother, Ms. Lindemulder, lacking in any way and allegations made by Bullock and her husband of recent drug use is totally unsubstantiated and undocumented as they were only made after Ms. Lindemulder was released from prison after serving 6 months for tax evasion, and wanted her child back. Also, the court has ordered that Ms. Lindemulder not work in the porn industry anymore and she has complied with that order (least we forget Ms. Bullock’s husband was married to Ms. Lindemulder so he didn’t have a problem with her porn past then).
Other than Ms. Lindemulder’s history (10 years ago she was on drugs), yet her child is five years old so she was off drugs for 5 years before her child was even born, can the father say the same?
The proof that Ms. Lindemulder is a good mother is that she has raised a beautiful and well adjusted child. Ms. Lindemulder has not mistreated her child, but Bullock and her husband are attempting to make a case for what "could" happen. Bullock's house could burn down (God forbid) with all of them in it, should they never be allowed to visit with the child?
Jill Brooks article appears to be about solidarity for stepmothers; that attitude is crazy because it’s not about their maternal instincts for someone else’s child. People are so selfish today, no one is perfect. I hope the child is returned to her mother.”
Other than Ms. Lindemulder’s history (10 years ago she was on drugs), yet her child is five years old so she was off drugs for 5 years before her child was even born, can the father say the same?
The proof that Ms. Lindemulder is a good mother is that she has raised a beautiful and well adjusted child. Ms. Lindemulder has not mistreated her child, but Bullock and her husband are attempting to make a case for what "could" happen. Bullock's house could burn down (God forbid) with all of them in it, should they never be allowed to visit with the child?
Jill Brooks article appears to be about solidarity for stepmothers; that attitude is crazy because it’s not about their maternal instincts for someone else’s child. People are so selfish today, no one is perfect. I hope the child is returned to her mother.”
Prevailing Wind replied on Nov 09, 2009 at 22:58:27
“You can argue your support of the bio-mom all you want, but I sure as hell wouldn't let my kid go to a playdate at that house with 2 ex-con (potentially former) druggies. With guns, no less.”
Momklok replied on Nov 09, 2009 at 18:08:56
“Child services regularly and frequently leave children in homes where they turn up dead, so don't suggest that their finding nothing wrong means a damn thing.”
alenaspoppa replied on Nov 09, 2009 at 12:47:12
“You know what? I lived in the bottom half of a house below a young mother with infant twins. They cried constantly and the mother's idea to quiet them down was to play her stereo at top volume while screaming "SHUT UP! SHUT UP!" I called DCFS numerous times, they visited the woman, and in the end they did nothing. So the fact the DCFS hasn't found the mother "lacking" isn't proof of anything.”
Can a Stepmother Like Sandra Bullock Be a Better Parent than a Biological Mom Who's a Porn Star?
Commented Nov 09, 2009 at 10:11:29 in Living
“I agree completely.”
Balanced Life -- 7 Tips If You're Chronically Late
Commented Oct 21, 2009 at 00:08:36 in Living
“Why is your husband "still upset" about his ex-wife's lateness and telling you about it? And why do you care? You sound like you don't like her either but unless you were the cause of their divorce, why do you care what her habits were while married to your now husband? You even refer to her friends as "cohorts who would not chide her." It sounds like you don't have clean hands in the scenario you described either.”
Arianna On This Week: Rangel Should Resign Chairmanship Of Tax-Writing Committee
Commented Oct 11, 2009 at 23:38:09 in Politics
“I disagree with Arianna for once the Democrats in Congress are showing some spine. Congressman Rangel’s tax issue is that he initially paid only half the taxes on $75,000; however, he’s now paid the rest of the taxes.
In addition there is an issue as to whether Congressman Rangel is allowed not to report income from a property he rents out in the Caribbean. After all this time, the authorities are still not sure whether he can or not. Oh, whether or not he can rent two rent control apartments in New York City; I he may have to give up one.
This is petty stuff compared to what the Republicans like Ensign are accused of. I’m surprised at Arianna. Congressman Rangel is a war hero and hasn't had a whiff of scandal in what; I'm guessing 25-30 years in politics?
Congress Rangel should absolutely not resign.”
In addition there is an issue as to whether Congressman Rangel is allowed not to report income from a property he rents out in the Caribbean. After all this time, the authorities are still not sure whether he can or not. Oh, whether or not he can rent two rent control apartments in New York City; I he may have to give up one.
This is petty stuff compared to what the Republicans like Ensign are accused of. I’m surprised at Arianna. Congressman Rangel is a war hero and hasn't had a whiff of scandal in what; I'm guessing 25-30 years in politics?
Congress Rangel should absolutely not resign.”
Trustandalwaysverify replied on Oct 11, 2009 at 23:46:04
“He ammended his returns... do you know how much he is going to pay in penalties and interest to IRS?
0
any other taxpayer, for that amount of undereporting will owe IRS millions of dollars already.
remember that when you see the amount of federal tax that is witheld from your paycheck.”
0
any other taxpayer, for that amount of undereporting will owe IRS millions of dollars already.
remember that when you see the amount of federal tax that is witheld from your paycheck.”
President Obama's Noble Nobel Prize
Commented Oct 09, 2009 at 14:08:19 in World
“We Americans sometimes forget how our policies affect the day-to-day lives of people in Europe and Third World countries. President Obama is worthy of the Nobel Peace Prize for winning the Presidential election and removing from power the Republican Party who have demonstrated that for all their holy rolling, they are evil personified on this Earth and the rest of the world understands this.
The Nobel Prize Committee comprehends what President Obama is up against, and that the Republican Party has sabotaged every effort President Obama's made since coming into office. However, the Committee is supporting the President’s agenda to reduce nuclear arms and know that President Obama is their best hope for negotiating peaceful resolutions to various conflicts throughout the world.
If the President wasn’t spending half is time fighting off sabotage by the Republican Party, he’d have accomplished even more.
President Obama’s most virulent adversaries are not Al Qaeda, the Taliban, North Korea or Iran, rather it's literally the Republican Party.
Nonetheless, the award is more than deserved. Congratulations Mr. President!”
The Nobel Prize Committee comprehends what President Obama is up against, and that the Republican Party has sabotaged every effort President Obama's made since coming into office. However, the Committee is supporting the President’s agenda to reduce nuclear arms and know that President Obama is their best hope for negotiating peaceful resolutions to various conflicts throughout the world.
If the President wasn’t spending half is time fighting off sabotage by the Republican Party, he’d have accomplished even more.
President Obama’s most virulent adversaries are not Al Qaeda, the Taliban, North Korea or Iran, rather it's literally the Republican Party.
Nonetheless, the award is more than deserved. Congratulations Mr. President!”
HartlessBeest replied on Oct 09, 2009 at 16:56:15
“To Lucille
CONGRATULATIONS! Excellent post,
In fact, I deem it appropriate to personally award you
*****THE BEST POST OF THE DAY*****”
CONGRATULATIONS! Excellent post,
In fact, I deem it appropriate to personally award you
*****THE BEST POST OF THE DAY*****”
Sage100 replied on Oct 09, 2009 at 16:11:30
“Evil personified is statism in its various guises. Unfortunately Obama appears to represent communistic/facistic statism, and is moving us down the road to more and more government control. Inevitably as history demonstrates, that leads to tyranny. Bush was a statist too, although he sided with the Rockefeller wing of the Republican Party. That wing wants wage slaves and peons, so the rich overlords can control us. So, pick your poison: The rich overlords, or the murderous government tyrants e.g. Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot, Mao, etc.
So, when you ding Rockefeller Republicans to prove that your form of statism is better, it is a false argument. Both are bad.
Learn more about history and the human condition. The founding fathers got it right, but our country has been undermined by little termites, all of whom were selfish people advocating for themselves or their group. Study the 16,17, ammendments and the damage they have done. The Federal Reserve opened the door for central banker to have access to the levers of power.
Our country was intended to have wise civilian leaders who did the job for a few years and then went back to their community. It was a service to their fellow countryman and a sacrifice. Do we have that now? Do either liberals or conservatives have that?”
So, when you ding Rockefeller Republicans to prove that your form of statism is better, it is a false argument. Both are bad.
Learn more about history and the human condition. The founding fathers got it right, but our country has been undermined by little termites, all of whom were selfish people advocating for themselves or their group. Study the 16,17, ammendments and the damage they have done. The Federal Reserve opened the door for central banker to have access to the levers of power.
Our country was intended to have wise civilian leaders who did the job for a few years and then went back to their community. It was a service to their fellow countryman and a sacrifice. Do we have that now? Do either liberals or conservatives have that?”
debqd replied on Oct 09, 2009 at 15:53:36
“Amen.”
JohnR22 replied on Oct 09, 2009 at 14:37:52
“Wow! The Republicans are the personification of all evil on earh, are they? All 62M who voted against Obama? That's a lot of "eeeevil"...or maybe I should say RACISM. Here's a newsflash you low IQ drone; the ONLY thing stopping Obama's legislation are the Blue Dog Democrats. The Dems have HUGE majorities in both Houses and can pass anything they want anytime they want. The fact that virtually ALL of their recent legislation is DOA is because it's so radically Left, and the Blue Dogs don't want to lose reelection.
The mistake of morons like you is in think that the 2006/08 elections were a mandate FOR socialism; they were not!! The elections were a rejection of Bush and the Neocons, but were NOT a mandate for Liberalism/socialism. Obama understands this quite well. It's why he's trying to jack his legislation through in the middle of the night, without transparancy or debate...before the voters can figure out how radically Left he is.”
The mistake of morons like you is in think that the 2006/08 elections were a mandate FOR socialism; they were not!! The elections were a rejection of Bush and the Neocons, but were NOT a mandate for Liberalism/socialism. Obama understands this quite well. It's why he's trying to jack his legislation through in the middle of the night, without transparancy or debate...before the voters can figure out how radically Left he is.”
Sleepless Supernova: Propofol Lullabies In Neverland
Commented Oct 06, 2009 at 19:55:36 in Living
“Dr. Ahmed, you said: "An ethical sleep specialist in the setting of Michael Jackson's insomnia could have been a life line into the chaos surrounding him, though agreed, Michael was recalcitrant to sensible intervention, as Dr. Deepak Chopra sadly relayed in his CNN interviews shortly after Michael's death."
Dr. Ahmed, I have to agree with you here, I wish Michael had sought out a sleep specialist but as he was addicted to various prescription medications, obviously he was avoiding getting help from doctors who could not be bought.
However, that doesn't excuse Dr. Conrad Murray's behavior as he’s not a very good doctor if he doesn't know that all the drugs he gave Michael, in such a short period of time, would kill him. I hope Dr. Murray is held criminally responsible for Michael Jackson's death.”
Dr. Ahmed, I have to agree with you here, I wish Michael had sought out a sleep specialist but as he was addicted to various prescription medications, obviously he was avoiding getting help from doctors who could not be bought.
However, that doesn't excuse Dr. Conrad Murray's behavior as he’s not a very good doctor if he doesn't know that all the drugs he gave Michael, in such a short period of time, would kill him. I hope Dr. Murray is held criminally responsible for Michael Jackson's death.”
Sleepless Supernova: Propofol Lullabies In Neverland
Commented Oct 04, 2009 at 19:50:53 in Living
“Michael Jackson's death is not already fading from our memories rather we are awaiting the criminal charges as to who will be held responsible for Michael’s death.”
Qanta Ahmed replied on Oct 05, 2009 at 21:36:05
“Yes, Lucille. You are correct, some are still waiting for answers and his music lives on. But unfortunately what I sense is that we will see others succumb to a combination of addictions, psychiatric disease, sleep disorders and consuming celebrity before we learn truly which factors contributed to Michael's demise. I delayed publishing this editorial which I originally wrote immediately after Michael's death became known to be related to propofol because I wasn't certain if commenting on his death in this manner would also be a form of consumption. It therefore remained tucked away in a folder on my desktop. When I saw that nowhere in the coast to coast coverage which preoccupied us for weeks that Michael's complex sleep issues were being discussed cogently, I decided we needed to try and learn something of value in all of the gratuitous discourse. I didn't fail to notice, as many of you probably did, that Michael's death became a bloodsport of consumption itself. The posthumous release of a movie ' THIS IS IT" is even more startling. But hardly unexpected.”
Thank You, Mr. President
Commented Oct 04, 2009 at 18:22:38 in Media
“The current elected Republicans officials stink and are corrupt and just no good. The GOP and the far right only remember the Constitution when it's convenient to them.
O.K., you're trying to be nice but it's not good enough. Your Party is filled with crazies and I'm so tired of being subjected to their rhetoric.
The far right really does want Obama to be killed; they want to break all employment unions and pay slave wages instead; and they don't care about women’s rights. Women of the far right believe such issues are irrelevant, because in their minds, as long as they’re both White and rich nothing bad can happen to them.
Even food is under attack by Republicans because they fight against regulations for producing, distributing and clearing printing labels of origin. People are blowing up like balloons because affordable food is filled with such synthetic properties our bodies obviously can’t handle it.
Republicans don't care about the future as it was President George Bush’s actions of faking reasons for a war and raping the national treasury by giving no bid contracts to his corporate buddies, and the Republicans, who had the majority in both Houses did nothing to stop him.
President Obama is giving his all while Republicans sabotage him at every turn.
Joe, your still the enemy, thanks for the rational thoughts, but it’s not good enough.”
O.K., you're trying to be nice but it's not good enough. Your Party is filled with crazies and I'm so tired of being subjected to their rhetoric.
The far right really does want Obama to be killed; they want to break all employment unions and pay slave wages instead; and they don't care about women’s rights. Women of the far right believe such issues are irrelevant, because in their minds, as long as they’re both White and rich nothing bad can happen to them.
Even food is under attack by Republicans because they fight against regulations for producing, distributing and clearing printing labels of origin. People are blowing up like balloons because affordable food is filled with such synthetic properties our bodies obviously can’t handle it.
Republicans don't care about the future as it was President George Bush’s actions of faking reasons for a war and raping the national treasury by giving no bid contracts to his corporate buddies, and the Republicans, who had the majority in both Houses did nothing to stop him.
President Obama is giving his all while Republicans sabotage him at every turn.
Joe, your still the enemy, thanks for the rational thoughts, but it’s not good enough.”
tmo7734 replied on Oct 04, 2009 at 19:58:36
“Terrific comments. And Joe Scarborough? Even a broken clock is right twice a day.”
lletaa replied on Oct 04, 2009 at 19:44:34
“It isnt good enough!!! If he changes his position on torture maybe he can join the human race. Until then his thoughts, opinions, life and credibility are nothing to me. I dont do sadists.”
Red-Rover replied on Oct 04, 2009 at 18:29:29
“WOW!
Me thinks an anger management class is in order.
All right now, lets gather round for a group hug.
hahahha”
Me thinks an anger management class is in order.
All right now, lets gather round for a group hug.
hahahha”
The Real Reason They Want ACORN to Fail
Commented Sep 25, 2009 at 14:31:48 in Politics
“I suspected as much but I wanted more information so I Googled your reference regarding Jack Abramoff and Northern Mariana Islands and it’s pretty shocking.
CNN reports: “Moved by the sworn testimony of U.S. officials and human-rights advocates that the 91 percent of the workforce who were immigrants -- from China, the Philippines, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh -- were being paid barely half the U.S. minimum hourly wage and were forced to live behind barbed wire in squalid shacks minus plumbing, work 12 hours a day, often seven days a week, without any of the legal protections U.S. workers are guaranteed.” http://www.cnn.com/2005//POLITICS/05/09/real.delay/);
or Wikipedia states: :A Department of the Interior report found that "Chinese women were subject to forced abortions and that women and children were subject to forced prostitution in the local sex-tourism industry." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki//Jack_Abramoff_CNMI_scandal).
Tom Delay was a part of all of this and he still could be charged regarding his part in this corruption.
The idea that this is what the Republicans intend for poor and working poor Americans could, and perhaps should start another civil war.”
CNN reports: “Moved by the sworn testimony of U.S. officials and human-rights advocates that the 91 percent of the workforce who were immigrants -- from China, the Philippines, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh -- were being paid barely half the U.S. minimum hourly wage and were forced to live behind barbed wire in squalid shacks minus plumbing, work 12 hours a day, often seven days a week, without any of the legal protections U.S. workers are guaranteed.” http://www.cnn.com/2005//POLITICS/05/09/real.delay/);
or Wikipedia states: :A Department of the Interior report found that "Chinese women were subject to forced abortions and that women and children were subject to forced prostitution in the local sex-tourism industry." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki//Jack_Abramoff_CNMI_scandal).
Tom Delay was a part of all of this and he still could be charged regarding his part in this corruption.
The idea that this is what the Republicans intend for poor and working poor Americans could, and perhaps should start another civil war.”
Artemis34 replied on Sep 25, 2009 at 15:38:40
“Interesting side note that given a lack of legal control, these conservatives proved once and for all that conservatives are actually anti-choice and not pro-life at all.”
The Real Reason They Want ACORN to Fail
Commented Sep 25, 2009 at 13:56:54 in Politics
“The people facing foreclosure are either already working; or due to the economic recession have lost their jobs and/or their subprime loans (many of whom qualified for regular loans but were steered to subprime loans), have resulted in mortgage payments skyrocketing.
My question is does the Republican Party want these types of people to be forced to work for low wages and few if any benefits? It seems that the Republicans are doing everything possible for that to occur, or do they have another plan for these people?”
My question is does the Republican Party want these types of people to be forced to work for low wages and few if any benefits? It seems that the Republicans are doing everything possible for that to occur, or do they have another plan for these people?”
Artemis34 replied on Sep 25, 2009 at 14:08:40
“They want indentured servants / slaves who certainly would not have any right of suffrage.
See their utopia in the Northern Mariana Islands:
http://www.pbs.org/moyers/citizensclass/capitol_crimes/abramoff_inc/”
See their utopia in the Northern Mariana Islands:
http://www.pbs.org/moyers/citizensclass/capitol_crimes/abramoff_inc/”
billhodges replied on Sep 25, 2009 at 14:08:03
“They should never been allowed to get into homes they could not afford, but Barney Frank and ACORN made it far to easy to bury these people.”
The Real Reason They Want ACORN to Fail
Commented Sep 25, 2009 at 13:40:05 in Politics
“You haven't answered my question, do you intend to?”
peacespy replied on Sep 25, 2009 at 18:02:23
“Use them as target practice for their beloved guns!”
billhodges replied on Sep 25, 2009 at 13:43:40
“They need to start working and stop living off the government.”
The Real Reason They Want ACORN to Fail
Commented Sep 25, 2009 at 13:11:52 in Politics
“Please someone answer this question for me:
If the Republicans and Conservatives don't want universal health care; and organizations like ACORN to help working people avoid foreclosure; and despite the increase in minimum wage, they didn’t vote for that either; and they don’t want unemployment insurance extended; and they’d like to break the unions and reduce wages and eliminate benefits for it’s members; and they don’t want to pay for Headstart for kids in kindergarten; and they don’t want women to have reproductive choices; etc.; basically, the Republicans want non-Republicans at their mercy. So my question is, if the Republicans should succeed in everything they wanted legislatively, what would they do with all the people who they have forced out into the streets with nothing? What do they intend to do with them?”
If the Republicans and Conservatives don't want universal health care; and organizations like ACORN to help working people avoid foreclosure; and despite the increase in minimum wage, they didn’t vote for that either; and they don’t want unemployment insurance extended; and they’d like to break the unions and reduce wages and eliminate benefits for it’s members; and they don’t want to pay for Headstart for kids in kindergarten; and they don’t want women to have reproductive choices; etc.; basically, the Republicans want non-Republicans at their mercy. So my question is, if the Republicans should succeed in everything they wanted legislatively, what would they do with all the people who they have forced out into the streets with nothing? What do they intend to do with them?”
peacespy replied on Sep 25, 2009 at 18:00:43
“Soilant green!”
MJinCanada replied on Sep 25, 2009 at 15:39:11
“It's insane isn't? Even the stupidest medieval warlords eventually caught on that if you keep starving and robbing the peasants, you'll either starve yourself, or be turned into pitchfork fondue.”
Artemis34 replied on Sep 25, 2009 at 13:57:18
“"what would they do with all the people who they have forced out into the streets with nothing?"
Exploit them. Put them to work in the sweat shops and make them pay to rent from them.
If you are wondering what they would do, free of law and regulation, under the US flag, look at what conservative friends of Jack Abramoff did in the Northern Marianas, essentially slavery.”
Exploit them. Put them to work in the sweat shops and make them pay to rent from them.
If you are wondering what they would do, free of law and regulation, under the US flag, look at what conservative friends of Jack Abramoff did in the Northern Marianas, essentially slavery.”
billhodges replied on Sep 25, 2009 at 13:26:59
“ACORN does not even want to pay it's employees mi. wage or let them unionize.
And even though ACORN is an enthusiastic supporter of government regulation of the economy, it hates having to obey those same regulations.
In 1995, ACORN sued the state of California seeking an exemption from the law that requires that it pay its own employees a minimum wage. ACORN, which argued that keeping its employees in poverty helps to boost their zeal to help the poor, lost. Even though it supports the continued imposition of equal employment opportunity laws on the rest of America, it argued it shouldn’t have to comply with those same laws. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission had to sue ACORN to force it comply with Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964”
And even though ACORN is an enthusiastic supporter of government regulation of the economy, it hates having to obey those same regulations.
In 1995, ACORN sued the state of California seeking an exemption from the law that requires that it pay its own employees a minimum wage. ACORN, which argued that keeping its employees in poverty helps to boost their zeal to help the poor, lost. Even though it supports the continued imposition of equal employment opportunity laws on the rest of America, it argued it shouldn’t have to comply with those same laws. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission had to sue ACORN to force it comply with Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964”
What Happened at Yale and the Dark Side of the Human Soul
Commented Sep 20, 2009 at 17:31:50 in New York
“To Alcortez, I agree with you 100% the nepotism that was allowed to occur contributed to Mr. Clark’s sense invulnerability because there were previous complaints registered against him about his rudeness to others who worked in that area, but apparently he was not seriously disciplined over it.
Mr. Clark had to have known Annie was getting married the next day, it’s hard to believe that anyone could be so self-centered and arrogant to think his cages or even his crush on her (if he indeed had one) would be paramount to Annie at that time in her life, and that any distraction or any nonchalance Annie may have exhibited towards him was cause to murder her.
Mr. Clark has behaved normally when it was required of him so he’s not insane. He took a life, so his life is forfeit.
My condolences to Annie Le’s family and finance, may God grant them peace and I hope Annie Le is resting in the loving arms of God.”
Mr. Clark had to have known Annie was getting married the next day, it’s hard to believe that anyone could be so self-centered and arrogant to think his cages or even his crush on her (if he indeed had one) would be paramount to Annie at that time in her life, and that any distraction or any nonchalance Annie may have exhibited towards him was cause to murder her.
Mr. Clark has behaved normally when it was required of him so he’s not insane. He took a life, so his life is forfeit.
My condolences to Annie Le’s family and finance, may God grant them peace and I hope Annie Le is resting in the loving arms of God.”
The Serena Williams "Incident" Isn't About Racial Bias, But It Is About Bias
Commented Sep 14, 2009 at 16:41:52 in Living
“Nicek article, thank you.”
The Destruction of the Black Middle Class
Commented Aug 05, 2009 at 02:23:38 in Politics
“Great article; one of the tactics used to accomplish Black unemployment is temporary work. Both Blacks and Whites take temporary work, usually through a temporary employment agency, but eventually Whites get permanently hired, while Blacks do not. In corporate America, the temporary worker is usually a "consultant" and these jobs give no benefits and the agency gets a percentage of the consultant’s salary. These “jobs” can go on indefinitely and many consultants work in the same position for years. However, some states have laws that after 9 months temporary workers must receive benefits, so at that time with no notice, the consultant is laid-off.
When the consultant/temp asks that same agency to find them permanent work the general response is that, despite their previous permanent work history, corporations will not hire them because they are currently temps. Yet, the consultant/temp is never warned by the agency of this result prior to taking a long-term temp assignment. However, more often than not, Whites are the exception to these rules, as I've personally seen White temporary workers quietly hired while Black temporary workers are reduced to nervous wrecks and are never hired. Black permanent workers (already there), confirm consultant/temp’s suspicions, but they need the income, so they stay as long as they can.
Also, it’s usually the policy of the corporation not to give references, particularly to temps so they have nothing to show for the months or years they worked there.”
When the consultant/temp asks that same agency to find them permanent work the general response is that, despite their previous permanent work history, corporations will not hire them because they are currently temps. Yet, the consultant/temp is never warned by the agency of this result prior to taking a long-term temp assignment. However, more often than not, Whites are the exception to these rules, as I've personally seen White temporary workers quietly hired while Black temporary workers are reduced to nervous wrecks and are never hired. Black permanent workers (already there), confirm consultant/temp’s suspicions, but they need the income, so they stay as long as they can.
Also, it’s usually the policy of the corporation not to give references, particularly to temps so they have nothing to show for the months or years they worked there.”


