Edit Preferences
Logout
MGhamma's Comments (381)
View Comments:
Sort:
1 - 25 of 381
Lieberman's Right on Fort Hood
Commented Nov 27, 2009 at 21:42:32 in Politics
“what political agenda was he promoting?”
chromodynamics replied on Nov 27, 2009 at 22:58:24
“None! A Major going postal within the US Army does not a terrorist make. While there certainly should be an inquiry into the Fort Hood shooting, it would be better served by a commission rather than a politically charged senate subcommittee hearing on the matter.
This nonsense that this was a terrorist attack is nothing more than a GOP talking point. No political organization has taken responsibility for Major Hasan’s actions, nor are we ever likely to hear of any offers of responsibility, except those proffered by the minions of the GOP that put America in a bad light.”
This nonsense that this was a terrorist attack is nothing more than a GOP talking point. No political organization has taken responsibility for Major Hasan’s actions, nor are we ever likely to hear of any offers of responsibility, except those proffered by the minions of the GOP that put America in a bad light.”
It Certainly Is An Impressive Hoax: Making The World's Glaciers Melt
Commented Nov 26, 2009 at 13:33:20 in Green
“It's true that the models are wrong. The glaciers are melting much faster than the models predicted. The world is warming much faster than the models predicted.
And all this is coincidentally happening at the same time as we are rapidly increasing the CO2 content of our atmosphere.”
And all this is coincidentally happening at the same time as we are rapidly increasing the CO2 content of our atmosphere.”
Mindblowing Video by Moms Against Climate Change
Commented Oct 30, 2009 at 16:58:36 in Green
“Yes rainman/fumes. I know, I know. You're an excellent driver.”
Fox Should Pay Obama for Pitching It
Commented Oct 25, 2009 at 14:52:17 in Media
“So, as phaux news ratings go up, conservitives, and the republicans ratings go down.
President Obama may be smarter than you think.
Me thinks you might have this backwards Earl.”
President Obama may be smarter than you think.
Me thinks you might have this backwards Earl.”
Superfreakonomics Will Misinform Readers on Climate Science
Commented Oct 18, 2009 at 13:44:26 in Books
“After skimming through the GW threads on huffpo, it's clear that Romeo, and Richard2/fumes have spent their entire weekends posting drivel.
Well, everyones got to have a hobby.”
Well, everyones got to have a hobby.”
realpolitic replied on Oct 18, 2009 at 14:01:28
“Man, without Romeo and Richard these threads would be so much more enjoyable. Romeo just posts the same nonsense time and time again and Richard seems to think he is some kind of scientist without any qualifications. Well, I like Fumes so i have to put up with him.”
Superfreakonomics Will Misinform Readers on Climate Science
Commented Oct 18, 2009 at 13:40:38 in Books
“Yes, I'd also like to see Romeo or Richard/fumes provide links to actual scientific research and analisis that backs up their claims.”
realpolitic replied on Oct 18, 2009 at 14:09:27
“Never! They believe their opinions should be persuasive enough!”
Superfreakonomics Will Misinform Readers on Climate Science
Commented Oct 18, 2009 at 13:35:57 in Books
“Mamacat, you've just described the denier arguement to a tee.”
President Obama's Noble Nobel Prize
Commented Oct 09, 2009 at 11:55:41 in World
“It's fun watching repubs.
Kind of like watching a 5 year old throw a temper tantrum.
Actually, come to think of it, it's exactly like watching a 5 year old throw a temper tantrum.”
Kind of like watching a 5 year old throw a temper tantrum.
Actually, come to think of it, it's exactly like watching a 5 year old throw a temper tantrum.”
People Fill the Streets for Climate Action in Bangkok
Commented Oct 07, 2009 at 11:08:20 in Green
“Ya, the "crazies', like the scientists,( every major scientific orginazation in the world is part of the concensis) who rely on evidence, and real world data, and detailed and painstaking analisis, to base their conclusions on.
You mean those "crazies"?
But I suppose we should just listen to people like you, who have no scientific credentials, and who's understanding of the science of GW is laughable at best.
I think I'll go with the experts on this one.”
You mean those "crazies"?
But I suppose we should just listen to people like you, who have no scientific credentials, and who's understanding of the science of GW is laughable at best.
I think I'll go with the experts on this one.”
Calinative replied on Oct 07, 2009 at 13:28:18
“"who rely on evidence, and real world data"
They rely on computer models. That is not the same as empirical evidence.”
They rely on computer models. That is not the same as empirical evidence.”
Editing the Bible
Commented Oct 07, 2009 at 10:40:09 in Politics
“To take the "liberal" out of the bible, they'll have to take out all of the teachings of Christ.
Of course, then it won't be called Christianity.
They'll have to rename it Conservinanity.”
Of course, then it won't be called Christianity.
They'll have to rename it Conservinanity.”
NetworkGuy replied on Oct 07, 2009 at 14:15:08
“I kind of like christ-insanity.”
calirighty replied on Oct 07, 2009 at 12:33:32
“Sorry. But I fail to find in the Bible anything that states that people should be forced to be charitable. Every teaching of Christ referred to people as INDIVIDUALS. He never spoke about government involvement to enforce his teachings.”
smileatfear replied on Oct 07, 2009 at 12:23:46
“God was fair. S/he gave the conservatives the old testament, full of hate and brimstone and revenge and S/he gave progressives the new testament. But the greed of conservatives knows no bounds and now they want the new testament too.”
aftershock replied on Oct 07, 2009 at 11:08:46
“Or just insanity..
Hazelnut replied on Oct 07, 2009 at 10:57:14
“With emphasis on the "inanity"!”
What's Spanish for Total and Complete BS?
Commented Sep 30, 2009 at 11:34:58 in Green
“Classic.
ReedYoung references a SCIENCE based publication.
Calinative references an OPINION based publication.
The global warming "debate" in a nutshell.
Classic.”
ReedYoung references a SCIENCE based publication.
Calinative references an OPINION based publication.
The global warming "debate" in a nutshell.
Classic.”
Calinative replied on Sep 30, 2009 at 13:09:49
“Uh, no actually. I referenced a paper written by two scientists picking apart the actual findings of climate scientists.”
What's Spanish for Total and Complete BS?
Commented Sep 30, 2009 at 11:05:46 in Green
“www.realcl
www.skepti
Go to those 2 websites and ask them Calinative.
What?
Scared to?
Figures.”
www.skepti
Go to those 2 websites and ask them Calinative.
What?
Scared to?
Figures.”
Calinative replied on Sep 30, 2009 at 13:54:11
“Here's is the explanation from realclimat
"The reason has to do with the fact that the warmings take about 5000 years to be complete. The lag is only 800 years. All that the lag shows is that CO2 DID NOT CAUSE THE FIRST 800 YEARS OF WARMING, out of the 5000 year trend. The other 4200 years of warming COULD IN FACT HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY CO2, as far as we can tell from this ice core data."
Did you catch that? It could have been caused by CO2. "Could have been caused by CO2". So it might actually have nothing to do with CO2. And that is from a link you provided.”
"The reason has to do with the fact that the warmings take about 5000 years to be complete. The lag is only 800 years. All that the lag shows is that CO2 DID NOT CAUSE THE FIRST 800 YEARS OF WARMING, out of the 5000 year trend. The other 4200 years of warming COULD IN FACT HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY CO2, as far as we can tell from this ice core data."
Did you catch that? It could have been caused by CO2. "Could have been caused by CO2". So it might actually have nothing to do with CO2. And that is from a link you provided.”
What's Spanish for Total and Complete BS?
Commented Sep 30, 2009 at 10:58:01 in Green
“Calinative, What were seeing now is an observable rise in global temps following an observable rise in CO2 levels. Your constant harping about what happened thousands of years ago when there wasn't 7 billion humans pumping massive amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere is completely irrelevent to the AGW subject, and smacks of the desperation of someone who can't admit that they're wrong.
Of course, since, like you, I'm not a climate scientist, l could be wrong. My ego isn't dependent on pretending that I'm somehow the smartest person in the world.”
Of course, since, like you, I'm not a climate scientist, l could be wrong. My ego isn't dependent on pretending that I'm somehow the smartest person in the world.”
What's Spanish for Total and Complete BS?
Commented Sep 29, 2009 at 22:42:29 in Green
“Richard2/fumes, there are no scientists here debating GW. The concensus is among those that know what they're talking about. The only ones trying to debate GW are pathetically ignorant on the subject.”
realpolitic replied on Sep 30, 2009 at 18:02:27
“Yes, MG, they have so much misinformation and so much certitude. It is the kind of certitude only the very incurious have!”
ReedYoung replied on Sep 30, 2009 at 01:49:48
“... and/or paid by one of Koch Industries' many front groups.
http://www
http://www
What's Spanish for Total and Complete BS?
Commented Sep 29, 2009 at 22:36:43 in Green
“I think it's kind of the resident deniers to come on this thread and provide a few examples of the debunked BS that Mr Boyce was refering to. Although some of the examples have a distinctly moldy smell.
Yes, very kind indeed.”
Yes, very kind indeed.”
Chic Bowdrie replied on Sep 30, 2009 at 15:53:37
“Having not yet located Boyce's so-called debunked study by an unnamed author, I hesitate to "pile" on. But I can't resist. I think the argument that global warming, which has been on hold for around 8 years, is caused by CO2 is as moldy as it gets. BS stinks regardless of source.”
Where's the Change? It's Everywhere
Commented Sep 28, 2009 at 13:47:13 in Politics
“Thanx Dylan for saying what I've been seeing.”
biglover replied on Sep 28, 2009 at 14:25:46
“Yes, thank you Dylan.”
It Is Five Minutes To Environmental Midnight. We Need To Act - Urgently
Commented Sep 23, 2009 at 13:02:15 in Green
“One scientist says that warming MIGHT pause for a while, and you turn that into "IPCC top >scientists< are bailing" ?
Talk about hyperbole!”
Talk about hyperbole!”
gs-425 replied on Sep 23, 2009 at 16:29:21
“the emperor has new clothes!!!”
It's a Cold War: Fox Against the President
Commented Sep 20, 2009 at 15:48:56 in Media
“Wasn't it faux news that refused to carry the Presidents speech to the nation?
The rethugs are getting what they want. And now they're complaining?
Spoiled children, all of them.”
The rethugs are getting what they want. And now they're complaining?
Spoiled children, all of them.”
New Rule: You Can't Complain About Health Care Reform If You're Not Willing to Reform Your Own Health
Commented Sep 19, 2009 at 23:44:42 in Comedy
“As usual, Bill nails it.
This would be a volentary tax. If you don't want to pay it, don't buy unhealthy foods. Don't buy booze. Don't buy cigarettes.
Personal responsibility at its finest.”
This would be a volentary tax. If you don't want to pay it, don't buy unhealthy foods. Don't buy booze. Don't buy cigarettes.
Personal responsibility at its finest.”
Pem3 replied on Sep 20, 2009 at 07:13:37
“Here is One support health care with out the tax on so called sins. If you can do that than you have a chance for reform to work, But if you have everyone quit things and they do, they were the major source of funds by their tax.”
mmgth replied on Sep 20, 2009 at 02:20:46
“Define unhealthy food.”
AlGionfriddo replied on Sep 20, 2009 at 00:34:13
“I don't smoke, I don't gamble, I don't drink hard liquor, I rarely drink wine... but I'm not giving up my German/Czech beer.”
Wilson Is the Poster "Child" for the New Republican Party
Commented Sep 10, 2009 at 12:16:05 in Politics
“Well said Robert!!”
A Surprise Way to Keep Our Beaches Clean: Pass a Climate Bill
Commented Sep 02, 2009 at 13:09:16 in Green
“If we took "could, "maybe', and "possible" from you deniers when you try to "argue" the science of global warming, you'd be mute.
Wait a minite, what am I saying? You'd just talk more, and say even less than before, if that's possible.”
Wait a minite, what am I saying? You'd just talk more, and say even less than before, if that's possible.”
What's With the Climate Change Deniers?
Commented Aug 21, 2009 at 01:32:30 in Green
“Good point Tom.”
What's With the Climate Change Deniers?
Commented Aug 21, 2009 at 01:23:10 in Green
“"And even though the changes that occured 19,000 years ago were due to the increased solar radiation, that amount of heating can be translated into what is expected from the current increases in greenhouse gas levels".
A direct quote from your link.
For crying out loud fumes/richard2, do you really think that we don't read your links?
You just can't make this stuff up.”
A direct quote from your link.
For crying out loud fumes/richard2, do you really think that we don't read your links?
You just can't make this stuff up.”
realpolitic replied on Aug 24, 2009 at 20:44:43
“Richard2 usually re-interprets the article in an entirely different way from what it says!”
What's With the Climate Change Deniers?
Commented Aug 21, 2009 at 01:09:45 in Green
“You're right TomBar, the global temps are exposing the lie you all are telling.
thanx.”
thanx.”
What's With the Climate Change Deniers?
Commented Aug 21, 2009 at 01:07:38 in Green
“Read my post again. I never claimed that an El nino can stabilize global temps.
You're just making something up so that you can pretend that you're still argueing the global warming subject.
I rest my case.”
You're just making something up so that you can pretend that you're still argueing the global warming subject.
I rest my case.”
realpolitic replied on Aug 24, 2009 at 20:50:10
“Well done, MG. They always try to change the subject when caught using misinformation!”
1 - 25 of 381
