HuffPost Social News

Mach8's Comments (311)

View Comments:   Sort:
next
1 - 25 of 311
huffingtonpost entry

Wanted: Dead or Alive

Commented Dec 03, 2009 at 00:21:19 in Politics

“How convenient.”

OdinsEye replied on Dec 03, 2009 at 10:59:54

“It has nothing to do with convenience. It has to do with the officer protecting himself. It appears than Clemmons may have set the circumstances up as a trap to kill another cop. The police wanted this guy captured. That is why they did not just rush into the house they thought he was in, guns a blazin, but instead waited outside for hours trying to establish communcation with him.”

Smithn replied on Dec 03, 2009 at 00:34:53

“WTF?!”
huffingtonpost entry

Wanted: Dead or Alive

Commented Dec 03, 2009 at 00:13:59 in Politics

“So now we condone vigilante justice by so-called "peace officers"? So it's okay for a cop to kill someone who has already killed because he will likely kill again? What the hell do we have courts and lawyers and judges for then? Why don't we chuck the whole system and let cops mete out justice at their own discretion. Yeah, that's the ticket. That would work REAL well...

As a police officer, you should understand that we have a legal system for a reason. Our system is supposedly designed to OBJECTIVELY determine guilt (though it often PRESUMES guilt nowadays). If the only thing citizens have to look forward to is street justice by cops in the place of the ridiculously flawed criminal justice system we already have, these types of situations will just escalate.”

OdinsEye replied on Dec 03, 2009 at 11:13:51

“This was not vigilantism, it was self-defense. The officer, during a traffic stop, was approached by a suspect in a quad homicide. The suspect knew the police were looking for him, had been actively avoiding police, yet in this case he deliberately chose to approach a clearly marked police officer. You really have to ask yourself why the suspect would do that when by all logic he should have high tailed it out of the area as soon as he saw the cop. One very possible reason is that the car in the road was a trap and that the suspect planned on shooting this lone officer. Then, when the cop gets out of the vehicle and orders t the suspect to stop and show his hands, the suspect continues to approach. This does not bode well. A second time, the officer orders the suspect to stop and show his hands. This time, the suspect makes a furtive movement like he is reaching for a weapon. The officer is now in fear for his life. He is faced with an approaching person considered armed and very dangerous who is not obeying commands and appears to be reaching for a weapon. The officer has a fraction of a second to react. The suspect is already in action. An examination after the incident shows teh suspect indeed had a weapon, a sidearm he had removed from one of the officers he murdered previously.

This was not vigilatism. This was self-defense.”

OdinsEye replied on Dec 03, 2009 at 11:12:47

“As a cop, we understand that our lives can be threatened any time. We are taught to be alert to anyone approaching us especially during a traffic stop (this is where most of the shootings of police occur). We do not take justice into our own hands and we support the legal system. But when someone poses a threat to us, we are also trained in the use of force model/continuum and the circumstances when the use of lethal force is justified.”

JoeTheProgrammer replied on Dec 03, 2009 at 07:42:12

“Sometimes there is overwhelming evidence for all to see. The guy was "suspected" of killing four cops, then ignored an order to stop. The order to stop was the perps chance to get his day in court. He ignored it. He's dead now. I'm glad they killed him. Spare me the tears that the animal didn't get his day in court.”

SkyCap replied on Dec 03, 2009 at 02:28:19

“Um...like the author said, put yourself in the officer's shoes. The suspect was clearly insane and dangerous and specifically had killed other police officers..­.this was self defense and was very reasonable. Sure, officers should try to take people alive if they can, but they have to protect their own lives. The behavior you demand from the officer goes against any common sense. If you have ever been a cop standing in a street facing a murderer who has killed other police officers for no reason and you have only seconds to make a decision whether or not to shoot...th­en maybe you might understand.”

Smithn replied on Dec 03, 2009 at 00:40:44

“He was looking for children tol kill as well as an intersection of people to kill. Apparently, He was just like a rabid dog.”
huffingtonpost entry

F**k Maine: A Call for Civil Disobedience in the Fight for Marriage Equality

Commented Nov 17, 2009 at 12:58:54 in Politics

“So "threatening" is not getting lynched for looking at a white woman? Or sitting at the same lunch counter? Or using the same public bathroom?

This false equivalence argument is weak and counterproductive.

Bet HuffPo scrubs this one too...”
huffingtonpost entry

Why the Gay Marriage Message Is Misfiring: Part 1

Commented Nov 16, 2009 at 18:52:58 in Politics

“Why not? Gays are blaming Blacks for gay marriage being in retreat. Gays have a far greater problem than Black opposition to gay marriage yet the Black community is the recipient of its anger.”

felliott replied on Nov 17, 2009 at 03:02:43

“Last time I checked, most of the negative attention from gays over Prop 8 was directed at Mormons.”

Liberal Angel replied on Nov 16, 2009 at 22:29:01

“We're blaming homophobes, in all races. We blame religious fools more than anyone, because they are the ones behind this campaigne against our civil rights.”

GrahamInCanada replied on Nov 16, 2009 at 19:33:04

“Gay marriage is not in retreat. If it advances at the same pace it has been advancing for the past twenty years, it is a foregone conclusion.”

JayJonson replied on Nov 16, 2009 at 19:11:38

“Actually, I think Blacks have far more problems than gays blaming them for defeating gay marriage. There is, after all, some irony in the fact that Blacks have by far the lowest marriage rate of any demographic, with something like 2/3 of Black children born out of wedlock. And yet Blacks are so committed to the "sanctity" of marriage that they attack same-sex marriage in their Churches all the time.”
huffingtonpost entry

Why the Gay Marriage Message Is Misfiring: Part 1

Commented Nov 16, 2009 at 13:08:54 in Politics

“Yet you seem to give the hundreds of thousands of whites who voted for it a pass. As well as the many whites who have been instrumental in defeating gay marriage EVERYWHERE.”

Steamboater replied on Nov 16, 2009 at 13:51:25

“No I don't but white homophobes couldn't have succeeded in CA without help from a large portion of black homophobes.”
huffingtonpost entry

Why the Gay Marriage Message Is Misfiring: Part 1

Commented Nov 16, 2009 at 13:04:08 in Politics

“Good luck with the gay marriage thing then.

When you guys stop killing the messenger and listen to the message then maybe, just maybe, YOU might have a clue.”

Steamboater replied on Nov 16, 2009 at 13:56:35

“Hey, you're the one who thinks equality is a joke; you laugh about it. We listen all right and your post would have some meaning for us if it made any sense.”
huffingtonpost entry

Why the Gay Marriage Message Is Misfiring: Part 1

Commented Nov 16, 2009 at 12:58:47 in Politics

“"Left to individual states where blacks are numerous and where blacks thump their bibles as heavily as any thumper, marriage rights, no matter how much of an outreach Gays do, would never pass."

How do I not "get it"? You don't seem to "get" that Blacks, for the most part, are not a statistically significant voting bloc on the gay marriage issue. If the Blacks who voted on the issue voted 100% for gay marriage, gay marriage would STILL be in complete retreat as it is now.”

Steamboater replied on Nov 16, 2009 at 13:53:03

“That's not true and certainly wasn't true in regard to Prop Hate in CA. It would have been defeated if blacks overall voted against it.”

Lawrence English replied on Nov 16, 2009 at 13:17:27

“Not in California. The vote was very close. The African-American vote was 70-80% in favor of Prop8 and they voted heavily in that election. They could have made the difference.”
huffingtonpost entry

Why the Gay Marriage Message Is Misfiring: Part 1

Commented Nov 16, 2009 at 12:39:54 in Politics

“This is nonsense. Blacks don't make it a priority to turn out on votes regarding gay issues. Gay marriage has been shot down EVERYWHERE. Prop 8 passed because more of EVERYONE, whites, blacks, latinos, voted for it. Sad but true. Vilifying a group because your message failed is cheap and guarantees future failure. It seems like gays are more interested in acting the victim than finding a message that WORKS.”

etiennemacchias replied on Nov 16, 2009 at 13:14:40

“We are the victim. We're constantly denied or revoked of our rights from the majority. How is that not victimization?

In regards to Prop 8, if you go back and read the election coverage reports, a record number of Latinos and Blacks have shown up for that election -- though not primarily to promote Prop 8. According to the exit poll, they have contributed significantly to the passing of Prop 8.

http://www.pollster.com/blogs/the_exit_poll_and_prop_8.php

Steamboater replied on Nov 16, 2009 at 12:51:22

“It seems you just don't get it. Blacks may not make it a priority in certain states to turn out and vote against Gay rights but the issue of priorities in regard to blacks vis-a-vis Gay rights was not something I even included in my post. You read what you wanted to read.”

Jonster replied on Nov 16, 2009 at 12:45:15

“"Vilifying a group because your message failed is cheap and guarantees future failure. "

Ha! That's the pot calling the kettle black.”
huffingtonpost entry

Why the Gay Marriage Message Is Misfiring: Part 1

Commented Nov 16, 2009 at 12:30:28 in Politics

“I have to laugh at people like you. Ms. Goff's essay was excellent and clearly outlined the deficiencies of the LGBT movement to move gay marriage forward. And you offer more excuses? Hilarious.

First of all, calling it "marriage equality" was asking for trouble. Gay marriage "equal" to heterosexual marriage? I think the majority of people feel that gays should have equal protection under the law (wingnuts and fundamentalists notwithstanding) but if the notion is to get people to accept that homosexuality is EQUAL as a practice to heterosexuality, good luck with that. Most people simply don't believe that and no amount of calling them "homophobes" is going to change that.

I've stated time and time again that the LGBT community is engaging in the wrong fight and have been insulted in many creative ways. But I'm just the type of person the LGBT community needs because I actually believe in their right to have equal protection under the law. A system built on hypocrisy will ultimately fail, whether its a government or advocacy movement.”

Tekkdude replied on Nov 16, 2009 at 16:21:56

“With friends like you, who needs enemies? I mean, really, where do you get off saying "but if the notion is to get people to accept that homosexuality is EQUAL as a practice to heterosexuality, good luck with that". As you can see in my post above, I agree that calling the thing marriage is the wrong tack to take on this issue. But not once, NOT EVER, should you or any other heterosexual think that you are better or more normal than us. Sexuality defines who you have sex with, not who you are as a person and most of all does nothing to indicate your worth as an individual. You need to step back and think about what you are saying when you make statements like the one above. If you truly believe in equality (marriage or otherwise) than you can not make statements like that. It just doesn't jibe.”

Steamboater replied on Nov 16, 2009 at 12:47:50

“If you saw us as human beings and part of this fabric of American democracy and stopped seeing us only in the clinical sense of some THING sexual (homosexuality is a clinical term defining the sexual ONLY; we don't screw 24 hours a day) maybe, just maybe you might have a clue. I don't give a sh*t what heteros think. I don't want their love and I don't care if they like me or not but I demand equality. It's not for heteros either to tell us what fight we should fight and what fight we should. We know what's best for us even if you don't.”
huffingtonpost entry

The U.S. and China: The Defining Issue of Our Day

Commented Nov 14, 2009 at 11:41:13 in World

“The U.S. consumer doesn't have a choice. Wages have stagnated while the cost of everything has tripled in the last 8 years. Cheap Chinese goods are about all anyone can afford now and the U.S. doesn't manufacture anything anymore.

I'm sick of people trying to pin our economic woes on the American public.”
huffingtonpost entry

The U.S. and China: The Defining Issue of Our Day

Commented Nov 14, 2009 at 11:34:32 in World

“China already has the means to disable the U.S. GPS system and destroy its most fearsome weapons, its aircraft carriers. Intelligence is the name of the game for our military and, without it, it is vulnerable. Remove the intelligence component and compromise its reach and the U.S. essentially has to go mano-a-man­o... who do you think has the better numbers? I guarantee Chinese small arms aren't as fickle as their U.S. counterparts and their military probably outnumbers the U.S. military 4-to-1.

What good would it be to loan someone money and not be able to call their marker? It's inevitable that China will ultimately develop the means to completely negate the strengths of the U.S. military. The countermeasures to defeat U.S. super-weapons are far cheaper than the super-weapons themselves. China may spend less on weapons but I'm pretty sure its investments are more strategic.

Congress has put the U.S. up as collateral for its loans, thinking that it can simply default in the worst case scenario. Our taxes primarily only pay interest on our debt to China and the Federal Reserve. The wealthy elite has decided to deliver this country into serfdom to pay off their benefactors and retain power. As time goes on, the U.S. people will only have two choices... serfdom or destruction.”

barakagirl replied on Nov 14, 2009 at 16:31:25

“OK man you've said it all!!! people have been dumb down into thinking they are free! but they leave in a modern Serfdom!!! they don't get the entire implications of Globalization and the rise of emerging markets/nations. Americans are fixated on Al qaida and Afganistan!!! nonsense ! How do we get back to the innovative, high tech mindset of last century is the MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE! we need to get back to basics, work hard and innovate that's how we keep up or soon China would face illegal aliens coming from the US...



BRAVO MY FRIEND YOU SUMMED UP MY THINKING”
huffingtonpost entry

Marriage Equality and the Myth of "Gay Apartheid"

Commented Nov 11, 2009 at 22:50:41 in Politics

“Funny... I posted stuff like this last year when the so-called "marriage equality" movement had a full head of steam and Prop 8 was on the horizon. I stated that the LGBT movement was making a big mistake equating its struggle to the Black civil rights movement. Needless to say, that didn't go over very well. No doubt gays have endured persecution, but there are plenty of ways in which gays have far more acceptance than Blacks do even today.

As long as the LGBT community keeps attempting to make false equivalence arguments for its cause rather than focusing on the very legitimate legal argument it has for demanding same-sex marriage, it will continue to face disappointment. Regardless of how anyone may feel about the LGBT lifestyle, same-sex marriage is a choice between two consenting adults and should be respected under the law. It's almost impossible to argue against gay marriage from a legal standpoint, at least reasonably.”

Tanyars5 replied on Nov 11, 2009 at 22:57:33

“Maine closes the book on the Black people scapegoat strategy. They have nothing.”
Five Myths the Recession Taught Us

Five Myths the Recession Taught Us

Commented Nov 11, 2009 at 12:23:09 in Business

“"The "Great Recession" has given employers the excuse they need to fire everyone ("sorry, it's the recession"). Consequently, productivity has shot up considerably. This is a good thing that will have long-term positive effects on the economy. And as businesses replenish their inventories, companies will be forced to hire good people to help them create those inventorie­s."

The problem isn't unproductive workers but incompetent business leadership. When the economy tanks, many of a business's most productive workers get laid off while incompetent leadership either rides out the storm or rides off into the sunset with their severance packages. Bad economies rarely make the rich poor but often make the less rich a lot more poor.”

vlm1948 replied on Nov 12, 2009 at 08:53:52

“Definitely agree. Most of the a$$ kissers get promoted and the people who actually know something are side-lined. Corporatocracy, welfare for the rich.”
huffingtonpost entry

Ambush of a Cop

Commented Nov 10, 2009 at 08:17:54 in Politics

“"Do our cops understand the survival benefits of treating people with dignity and respect, of behaving with maturity and self-discipline?"

No.

At least 5 minorities have been unjustly killed by police officers this year. And this doesn't include the instances of abuse that have been captured on film. The police are becoming an occupying force on our streets. As long as the so-called "decent" cops support their fraternity that condones the oppression and murder of citizens for being a different color or speaking a different language, incidents like this are likely to become more frequent.”
Obama Is Timid Because Progressives Are Timid

Obama Is Timid Because Progressives Are Timid

Commented Nov 04, 2009 at 10:51:44 in Politics

“You are being too literal.”
Obama Is Timid Because Progressives Are Timid

Obama Is Timid Because Progressives Are Timid

Commented Nov 04, 2009 at 10:37:32 in Politics

“I've come to realize that there is a fundamental misunderstanding between the so-called "left" and "right." The fact is that the ideas that form the basis of both sides are correct:

"Conservatism" is based on the fundamental concept of "freedom".­.. but that term really means "freedom from force or coercion." A true conservative believes that people shouldn't be forced to do anything they don't want to do. They oppose government because governments are the ultimate users of force and coercion. Law enforcement and taxation can and often do become repressive forces to control population and dissent so a true conservative opposes those them. That doesn't sound too stupid, right? Ironically, ANARCHY is the logical solution.

But Republicans and corporatists have bastardized that idea to use it to get people sign on to their agenda of enforcing the rule of a wealthy elite. Today's "conservatives" say they "oppose" government but what they really want is a government that protects corporations and monopolies while undermining the ability for people to work collectively in opposition to those interests. In that respect, Republicans won't ever truly reduce government.

cont.”

Aaror replied on Nov 04, 2009 at 10:45:19

“Actually, conservitive is based on resisting change (look up what conserve means). Liberal is based on freedom (look up what liberty means). English is nice in that for the most part words with similar roots mean the same things, unless modified by a prefix that reverses the word (e.g. unfair is the opposite for fair).”
Obama Is Timid Because Progressives Are Timid

Obama Is Timid Because Progressives Are Timid

Commented Nov 04, 2009 at 10:37:18 in Politics

“cont.

"Progressives" believe in the fundamental power of the collective­... the idea of individuals working together for the common good. Collectivism is in our DNA and part of human nature, that is why we have tribes, families, nations, etc. Even corporations are types of collectives. The whole is always greater than the sum of its parts.

Democrats have bastardized that idea by making the government the focal point of the collective effort. When people are FORCED to be part of a collective, they are no longer free. That's why "socialism" and "communism" are such bad words to conservatives, they are FORCED collectives.

In all of this, the government looms. The "progressive" agenda is a knee-jerk response to the government undermining its freedom by protecting corporate interests. So progressives are trying to get the entity which is CREATING THE PROBLEM to solve it.

So BOTH groups are being lied to. Republicans won't ever reduce government in a way that benefits ALL people and Democrats are willing to give the state too much power.”

rkrenke replied on Nov 04, 2009 at 11:23:57

“I don't disagree that the Dems are part of the problem, but how have they given too much power to the state?”

I-know replied on Nov 04, 2009 at 11:10:20

“Great post”
huffingtonpost entry

Leadership, Obama Style

Commented Nov 02, 2009 at 19:12:45 in Politics

“"And every other Democrat would have gone after Wall Street with a vigor we have not seen from this president.­.."

I stopped reading after this. If Weston actually believes this, I want some of what he is smoking.”

rosetta2 replied on Nov 03, 2009 at 02:07:38

“I agree. He has spent too long in the classroom. He should get out more , maybe spend some time looking at the cable news shows the rest of us are subjected to. and visit DC perhaps.”
huffingtonpost entry

Sunday Roundup

Commented Nov 01, 2009 at 01:48:13 in Politics

“So, McCain in the pocket of Big Telco... the irony is hilarious.

So now the government guaranteeing a level playing field on the Internet is "regulatio­n." How many major companies would have remained stillborn if their bandwidth had been throttled? It's better to have telcos determine what sites we can go to instead of the FCC insuring that all packets pass through the Internet with the same priority?

If this passes, there are going to be MAJOR issues...”
We Can't Reform Health Care without Reforming Food

We Can't Reform Health Care without Reforming Food

Commented Oct 28, 2009 at 21:15:26 in Green

“"impractical" = prep

Who wants to go to the supermarket every day?”

Purobi replied on Oct 28, 2009 at 22:43:20

“Instead they will prefer to get sick and live a pathetic, unhealthy, uncomfortable life......”
To Be Real

To Be Real

Commented Oct 28, 2009 at 21:05:13 in Media

“Yep. I like BBC but, being American, I get bored with news from the rest of the world, haha. Co-sign on your post.”
To Be Real

To Be Real

Commented Oct 28, 2009 at 20:43:21 in Media

“fanned baby.”
To Be Real

To Be Real

Commented Oct 28, 2009 at 20:40:51 in Media

“"Enter the Fox, who took CNN's premise and promise and rewired it to appeal to a vast, disgruntled demographic which felt robbed of their memories of a golden era, when America was on top and certain people knew their place."

"Every week, it seems, we are treated to episodes from Theatre of the Blatantly Disingenuo­us..."

Just brilliant stuff.”

sandpiper1 replied on Oct 28, 2009 at 20:56:52

“BBC is your best bet for real news. Luckily I live in Canada and have access to CBC(Canadian Broadcasting Corporation) which covers real news also. CNN turned out to be such a disappointment, I imagine Ted Turner now regrets selling it though he made a bundle on the sale. Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert are both more informative re. real news that all the pseduo news networks. What a shame. Rachel Maddow, Dylan Ratinger are the best commentators, they at least research their topics and give us the facts.
Thanks Rachel and Dylan”
We Can't Reform Health Care without Reforming Food

We Can't Reform Health Care without Reforming Food

Commented Oct 28, 2009 at 20:26:24 in Green

“"I think eating healthy is expensive is a myth."

You're kidding, right? If you think buying fresh fruits and vegetables is more cost effective than buying processed food, I have a bridge in Brooklyn I'd like to sell you.”

AbsolutBlue replied on Oct 28, 2009 at 22:09:32

“Buying fresh fruits and vegetables can be cost effective, it's just a matter of where you shop. If you're buying your produce at Whole Foods, yeah, that's expensive, but if you look for local produce markets you will find that fruits and veggies aren't as expensive as you think. I know, I live in Nowhere, PA and I have local produce. Look harder, shop smarter.”
We Can't Reform Health Care without Reforming Food

We Can't Reform Health Care without Reforming Food

Commented Oct 28, 2009 at 20:05:09 in Green

“Don't feed red meat to the tr0//s Bob, haha.

Like I responded on Natalie Portman's post, eating healthy is expensive and impractical. On top of that, the use of corn products, especially in processed food, causes massive insulin spikes that contribute to diabetes. Frankly, I think that is as great a problem as the meat situation.­.. processed simple sugars and starches along with high-intensity sweeteners is turning us into a nation of diabetics.”

DrP replied on Oct 28, 2009 at 22:02:19

“Thanks for this post. You are on the right track. Meat is not the problem, although I I am appalled by the conditions at factory farms and would prefer to eat free-range, grass-fed, organic meat.”

isis replied on Oct 28, 2009 at 20:53:07

“It's hard to chose another brand of meat when the media needs those advertising dollars--or when you are dead and paralyzed. Very few people have heard of Ms. Smith's ordeal. Not to mention, when there are no nannies things are bad for the kids.”

dresdengirl replied on Oct 28, 2009 at 20:48:00

“I hear one more time that eating healthy is expensive and impractical (?) I am going to sream. Every supermarket has an area where they sell ripe fruit and vetegables, which should be eaten the same day or the day after. You can buy bags of apples for 99 cent. Or vetegables for a dollar or so.
Maybe we should bring back cooking classes in school. Also most people have a little probem with portion control.”

MicheleCA replied on Oct 28, 2009 at 20:17:45

“I think eating healthy is expensive is a myth. How could a plate of vegetables, legumes, & rice for instance cost more than a steak dinner?”

MrChrisSEA replied on Oct 28, 2009 at 20:12:34

“Yes, insulin is a large part (so to speak) of the obesity problem this country is facing. The more FDA/CDC told people to eat low-fat, high carb diets, the fatter they got.

Not only that, these high carb, low-fat diets are woefully devoid of live enzymes and nutrients needed for health. So people get lots of hollow calories which raise insulin levels, making you fat, and robbing you of nutrients.

One of the healthiest foods comes from a chicken running around a farm, in the sunshine, eating bugs, worms, and all the things they find in a healthy farm environment. The proof is in the quality of the yolk. It's plainly visible to see a rich, orange yolk that you've got a nutrient dense food. Commercially raised chickens will have pale yellow yolks.”
next
1 - 25 of 311