MiddleRoadLiberal's Comments (164)
Media Fail: Kimberly Munley Did Not Bring Down Fort Hood Killer
Commented Nov 12, 2009 at 17:03:17 in Media
“I guess I'm okay with a black man being the hero, so long as he is a christian and not a muslim or an atheist. Now that would ruin my worldview.”
cardineau replied on Nov 12, 2009 at 17:20:12
“Thanks for that ... I'm a Korean war veteran, a taxpayer, and an atheist.”
littlepuffycloud replied on Nov 12, 2009 at 17:10:07
“What if he's Hindu? Or Wiccan? would that be ok :)”
Marine Commandant Defies White House on Gay Troops
Commented Nov 02, 2009 at 20:37:17 in Politics
“"Given that we are fighting two wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, opponents will say, we just cannot take time out to focus on civil rights issues like gays in the military."
I know. Since we're fighting these two wars, it's ridiculous to get hung up on the whole "gay thing." It would be much easier to just let them serve openly. It's not like we don't need their service -- especially the translators.”
I know. Since we're fighting these two wars, it's ridiculous to get hung up on the whole "gay thing." It would be much easier to just let them serve openly. It's not like we don't need their service -- especially the translators.”
Cycadeoidea replied on Nov 02, 2009 at 20:45:28
“Absolutely.”
Eating Animals: Jonathan Safran Foer's New Book Asks Why Don't We Eat Pets?
Commented Oct 29, 2009 at 09:02:53 in Books
“You shouldn't let him watch that much television. Get him a good book or something.”
Jonathan Safran Foer's Eating Animals Turned Me Vegan
Commented Oct 27, 2009 at 13:15:25 in Books
“And how does one get meat in today's society if it's not mass-produced? You have to take the negatives with the positives with any system you have. I doubt the positives from outlawing meat will outweigh the negatives, or the positives of keeping it legal.”
Brendan H replied on Oct 27, 2009 at 16:34:21
“You don't have to make it illegal. If you properly regulate it, require it to be clean, and ban the process of factory farming due to it's detriment to public health, the problem will solve itself. The price of meat will skyrocket and only the rich will be able to afford it, leading to a likely phasing out over time.
Problem solved.
None of these steps have to be taken on a moral basis. Factory farming should be banned simply because of the risks to public health associated with it. If anything else was coming out of those factories and resulting in the same amount of pollution and public health concern, it would be shut down IMMEDIATELY, but people have such an immature, knee-jerk reaction to the truth about meat that they come out with all kinds of crazy nonsense to defend themselves.”
Problem solved.
None of these steps have to be taken on a moral basis. Factory farming should be banned simply because of the risks to public health associated with it. If anything else was coming out of those factories and resulting in the same amount of pollution and public health concern, it would be shut down IMMEDIATELY, but people have such an immature, knee-jerk reaction to the truth about meat that they come out with all kinds of crazy nonsense to defend themselves.”
Jonathan Safran Foer's Eating Animals Turned Me Vegan
Commented Oct 27, 2009 at 13:13:15 in Books
“There are ups and downs to every decision you make. The problems with our meat culture you describe are vastly overstated by vegans and animal rights groups. If you completely overhaul our way of life like you and Natalie Portman want there will be other, mostly unforseen consequences -- a new set of ups and downs.”
Brendan H replied on Oct 27, 2009 at 16:30:50
“Swine flu came from factory farming. That's a fact. You can't overstate that. Cramming together thousands of animals that are filled with antibiotics, living in pools of their own crap and blood, will produce disease and that disease WILL cross over to humans. This has been demonstrated, and we are seeing the effects of it now with swine flu as one example.
Meat is the direct cause of a significant portion of cancer, heart disease, diabetes, obesity, and some are even now saying ms and osteoporosis. Again, that's a fact.
Cows are responsible for more greenhouse gasses than cars. Once again, a fact.
Factory farms cause massive amounts of pollution to the air and water around them. Woah, another fact!
In order for there to be ups and downs, you have to have ups. There are no ups for meat. It's bad for our bodies, our environment, and as a result of those, also bad for our economy.
I could have made all the same arguments you are making for any other change to society:
"We can't declare ourselves independent from Britain, there will just be new problems!"
"We can't give women the right to vote, there will be unforeseen circumstances!"
Sometimes you do things because they are right, not because they are convenient.”
Meat is the direct cause of a significant portion of cancer, heart disease, diabetes, obesity, and some are even now saying ms and osteoporosis. Again, that's a fact.
Cows are responsible for more greenhouse gasses than cars. Once again, a fact.
Factory farms cause massive amounts of pollution to the air and water around them. Woah, another fact!
In order for there to be ups and downs, you have to have ups. There are no ups for meat. It's bad for our bodies, our environment, and as a result of those, also bad for our economy.
I could have made all the same arguments you are making for any other change to society:
"We can't declare ourselves independent from Britain, there will just be new problems!"
"We can't give women the right to vote, there will be unforeseen circumstances!"
Sometimes you do things because they are right, not because they are convenient.”
Jonathan Safran Foer's Eating Animals Turned Me Vegan
Commented Oct 27, 2009 at 13:11:03 in Books
“Some animals eat only plants, but that doesn't mean we have to. Try telling a shark or tiger to only eat vegetables simply because "there are animals out there that do."
The correct way to approach it is asking people what they prefer to eat. Most of them say a mix of animals and plants. Problem solved. Animals have gone from carnivore to herbivore and back several times over throughout the history of life on Earth. Do you think animals wait until their organs are fully developed for eating meat before doing it, or do you think their biology becomes more supportive of it *because* they do it first?”
The correct way to approach it is asking people what they prefer to eat. Most of them say a mix of animals and plants. Problem solved. Animals have gone from carnivore to herbivore and back several times over throughout the history of life on Earth. Do you think animals wait until their organs are fully developed for eating meat before doing it, or do you think their biology becomes more supportive of it *because* they do it first?”
Tabasco replied on Oct 27, 2009 at 13:53:33
“Thank you for that intelligent response.
You are correct. Our diets ARE a choice. But the notion that our survival as humans ONLY depends on digesting meat (as Jacukel seems to imply) is as compelling as a Weekly World News article on Elvis sightings.
If we somehow evolve (albeit very slowly) to carnivores, it will not come about by a sudden shift in diet toward meat, dairy, fish and eggs.
Sharks have systems that process and expel animal food source very quickly... . avoiding putrefication. So do canines, felines, some reptiles and members of the weasel and marten groups. We don't.
I've said it a hundred times. If you decide to eat meat (emphasis on 'decide'), then do it in MODERATION with better quality meat. Mix in a lot of veggies, whole grains and other non-adulterated plant foods.”
You are correct. Our diets ARE a choice. But the notion that our survival as humans ONLY depends on digesting meat (as Jacukel seems to imply) is as compelling as a Weekly World News article on Elvis sightings.
If we somehow evolve (albeit very slowly) to carnivores, it will not come about by a sudden shift in diet toward meat, dairy, fish and eggs.
Sharks have systems that process and expel animal food source very quickly...
I've said it a hundred times. If you decide to eat meat (emphasis on 'decide'), then do it in MODERATION with better quality meat. Mix in a lot of veggies, whole grains and other non-adulterated plant foods.”
Jonathan Safran Foer's Eating Animals Turned Me Vegan
Commented Oct 27, 2009 at 11:31:01 in Books
“Don't like it? Don't eat it. Wow, that was easy.”
Brendan H replied on Oct 27, 2009 at 12:14:42
“Interesting how you completely ignored my point. Obviously I already don't eat it. That isn't the topic at hand. The problem is the irreparable damage it is doing to our environment, the harm it is doing to our economy, and the epidemics it is creating (like swine flu). I still have to worry about my food being contaminated with e coli or salmonella because YOU choose to eat meat. I still have to worry about diseases caused by factory farms. I still have to worry about the pollution.
Take your logic to any other topic and it's clearly ludicrous:
"Dont like theft? Don't steal! Wow, that was easy!"
"Don't like when people drunk drive? Don't do it! Wow, that was easy!"
"Don't like littering? Don't litter! Wow, that was easy!"
If you think that that logic solves any of those problems, well then there isn't much else I can say.”
Take your logic to any other topic and it's clearly ludicrous:
"Dont like theft? Don't steal! Wow, that was easy!"
"Don't like when people drunk drive? Don't do it! Wow, that was easy!"
"Don't like littering? Don't litter! Wow, that was easy!"
If you think that that logic solves any of those problems, well then there isn't much else I can say.”
Jonathan Safran Foer's Eating Animals Turned Me Vegan
Commented Oct 27, 2009 at 11:30:40 in Books
“I know, animal husbandry is such an insane technology. It's crazy to find a way to feed entire populations of people without following food for months and risking their lives. This insanely gave crazy people enough free time to crazily invent civilization, which in turn helped us get to the crazy place we are today -- which is, insanely, a thousand times better on every benchmark than any other time in history. Crazy.”
Brendan H replied on Oct 27, 2009 at 12:21:21
“It was the leaps in produce farming which allowed that to happen, not animal farming. The people in feudal Europe were living at subsistence level. A subsistence level society (one where people have no time to do anything but farm) cannot spend much time on livestock because it takes up large amounts of time and land. You can get a lot more bang for your buck (despite that there was no currency) by produce farming.
Factory farming didn't become a reality until the 20th century, long after feudalism had given way to capitalism and led to the industrial revolution and animal farming changed very little from ancient times until the 20th century.. Trying to say something that took place in the 20th century caused the events of the previous centuries is nonsense.”
Factory farming didn't become a reality until the 20th century, long after feudalism had given way to capitalism and led to the industrial revolution and animal farming changed very little from ancient times until the 20th century.. Trying to say something that took place in the 20th century caused the events of the previous centuries is nonsense.”
etiennemacchias replied on Oct 27, 2009 at 12:03:55
“Historically, animal farming was reserved for the royalty. Peasants were lucky to have eaten meat once a year.
That being said, historically speaking, animal husbandry was never practice to feed entire populations. People's diets relied primarily on produce; mass animal farming is a modern phenomenon.
So if people of just a few hundreds years ago can do it, so can we.”
That being said, historically speaking, animal husbandry was never practice to feed entire populations. People's diets relied primarily on produce; mass animal farming is a modern phenomenon.
So if people of just a few hundreds years ago can do it, so can we.”
Jonathan Safran Foer's Eating Animals Turned Me Vegan
Commented Oct 27, 2009 at 11:27:18 in Books
“Actually, yours is. Is it morally wrong for one animal to eat another? No. Are humans animals? Yes. It doesn't matter how many species have never tasted juicy flesh, and it doesn't matter how we produce our animals. Try again.”
Tabasco replied on Oct 27, 2009 at 12:13:37
“So. Animals that only eat plants are not animals? And if they ARE animals, doesn't that drive your claim into question?
The correct way to approach this is by comparing the human digestive system to animals that are dedicated carnivores and dedicated herbivores. Throw in a few omnivores for good measure. Since significant evolution doesn't happen within 100,000 years, guess which class people fit into? Take your time.
http://www .vegsource .com/veg_f aq/compara tive.htm”
The correct way to approach this is by comparing the human digestive system to animals that are dedicated carnivores and dedicated herbivores. Throw in a few omnivores for good measure. Since significant evolution doesn't happen within 100,000 years, guess which class people fit into? Take your time.
http://www
etiennemacchias replied on Oct 27, 2009 at 11:56:54
“My claim is totally relevant.
Yes, SOME animals eat other live animals; no, it is not necessarily morally incorrect to eat other animals; and yes, humans are advanced animals.
If you believe that humans are no more different than any other animal based on our moral and intelligent grounds, then yes, we should feel no remorse eating meat as our bodies require protein. But I believe humans are quite different from, say, lions. Although we both need meat to survive, whereas lions can ONLY resort to hunting and eating the flesh of its preys, humans are capable of meeting that dietary requirement with synthetic protein and even other types of protein, such as soy and wheat germs.
Especially, knowing the adverse effects of consuming meat and farming animals -- health complications and environmental deterioration --, it boggles my mind why any one would kill for the meat.
P.S. I hope you don't eat that cat.”
Yes, SOME animals eat other live animals; no, it is not necessarily morally incorrect to eat other animals; and yes, humans are advanced animals.
If you believe that humans are no more different than any other animal based on our moral and intelligent grounds, then yes, we should feel no remorse eating meat as our bodies require protein. But I believe humans are quite different from, say, lions. Although we both need meat to survive, whereas lions can ONLY resort to hunting and eating the flesh of its preys, humans are capable of meeting that dietary requirement with synthetic protein and even other types of protein, such as soy and wheat germs.
Especially, knowing the adverse effects of consuming meat and farming animals -- health complications and environmental deterioration --, it boggles my mind why any one would kill for the meat.
P.S. I hope you don't eat that cat.”
Jonathan Safran Foer's Eating Animals Turned Me Vegan
Commented Oct 27, 2009 at 10:30:04 in Books
“Animals eat each other. Humans are animals. End of story. I'm totally supportive of anyone who wants to be vegetarian/vegan, but no one has any right to force anyone else to not eat animals (being annoying and preachy you have every right to, however). I personally think you could make an exception for endangered animals, but most of what we eat we are outnumbered by anyhow.”
Soliel replied on Oct 28, 2009 at 15:05:06
“No one is forcing you...we are asking that you consider the moral issues of eating meat.
Also, the animals we eat in this country the most...the cow, the pig, the chicken are totally harmless to us.
We are abusing, hurting, using and killing these gentle animals in the billions for our palates.
So don't use the excuse that other animals kill...the animals you are eating would never hurt you at all.”
Also, the animals we eat in this country the most...the cow, the pig, the chicken are totally harmless to us.
We are abusing, hurting, using and killing these gentle animals in the billions for our palates.
So don't use the excuse that other animals kill...the animals you are eating would never hurt you at all.”
VoteOnPaper replied on Oct 27, 2009 at 11:06:58
“The only reason we are outnumbered is because people went bonkers and started breeding cows, pigs, chickens, and turkeys.”
bsc replied on Oct 27, 2009 at 10:59:14
“the crux is not about eating animals, it is about mass produced meat.”
Brendan H replied on Oct 27, 2009 at 10:51:25
“The capability to eat animals doesn't make it right, wrong, or anything really. Whether we CAN do something or not is irrelevant.
I CAN kill people. Animals kill each other, and I'm an animal, so why can't I? Animals commit rape. Animals bash each other's skulls in when a member of the same species gets in the way. Your logic doesn't go very far.
I do, however, have the right to fight to properly regulate the meat industry, which would cause the price of meat to become so astronomical that the vast majority of people wouldn't be able to afford it and it would become a delicacy.
You say I don't have the right to tell you not to eat meat, but why do you have the right to pollute MY water and MY air. Why do you have the right to get pig crap all over my food? These are the costs of mass production of meat. Period.
Before you say "I don't do that, the meat industry does!" You vote with your dollars. You choose to support that industry. You know what that industry does and you CHOOSE to ignore it and funnel tons of money to it.”
I CAN kill people. Animals kill each other, and I'm an animal, so why can't I? Animals commit rape. Animals bash each other's skulls in when a member of the same species gets in the way. Your logic doesn't go very far.
I do, however, have the right to fight to properly regulate the meat industry, which would cause the price of meat to become so astronomical that the vast majority of people wouldn't be able to afford it and it would become a delicacy.
You say I don't have the right to tell you not to eat meat, but why do you have the right to pollute MY water and MY air. Why do you have the right to get pig crap all over my food? These are the costs of mass production of meat. Period.
Before you say "I don't do that, the meat industry does!" You vote with your dollars. You choose to support that industry. You know what that industry does and you CHOOSE to ignore it and funnel tons of money to it.”
etiennemacchias replied on Oct 27, 2009 at 10:42:41
“What?!
Not all animals eat each other and those animals that do eat other animals certainly do not farm their preys. Your claim is totally irrelevant.”
Not all animals eat each other and those animals that do eat other animals certainly do not farm their preys. Your claim is totally irrelevant.”
HuffPost Editor Roy Sekoff Talks Being Featured In Liz Cheney's New "Why Are They Afraid Of Us?" Ad (VIDEO)
Commented Oct 20, 2009 at 09:12:04 in Politics
“The last vestiges of the neocons grasping for relevance.”
Why Joe Biden Should Resign
Commented Oct 14, 2009 at 17:49:24 in World
“How about he stays where he is and throws his weight around from the inside. I know it's a foreign concept for liberals, who are always on the outside, but this is exactly what you campaign and become active for -- to get someone you agree with on the inside. Now, rewrite this article, but from the viewpoint that he should stay put and get loud and proud. I'll give you an hour.”
solid replied on Oct 14, 2009 at 18:22:15
“Who are you talking to? Arianna? Because most of us liberals don't agree with her premise.”
New Rule: Everyone Deserves Equal Rights
Commented Oct 09, 2009 at 18:35:01 in Comedy
“Gay and straight men already shower together in the military and not many of them care. Gays aren't slobbering sex fiends looking to check out every naked man they can.”
foxfan replied on Oct 12, 2009 at 21:09:31
“I was actually more concerned about the response of straight men to the gay men in the shower rather than the other way around.”
A Plan for Universal Coverage, Private Market Competition -- And Reduced Deficits
Commented Oct 06, 2009 at 18:50:30 in Politics
“Same here. I refuse to buy insurance at all. It's a scam. I'm not paying hundreds or thousands a year just to get dropped when I actually need the care. I go to the doctor maybe once in five years. Last time was strep throat. The doctor fee was $100 and the antibiotics were absolutely free. And to think I could have spent hundreds of dollars a year for that kind of coverage! A few years before that was a tetanus shot required for a job, and before that it was strep throat again -- seven whole years apart. You can say, "Well you never know when you're going to have something more serious and without insurance you'll be screwed financially," but my reply will be, "If I get something more serious, the insurance company will find a way to screw me financially anyway." So what the hell is the point. I'd rather pay a fine to the gov't than give insurance companies any money. It would just make more sense if that money went towards a public plan instead.”
justobserve replied on Oct 07, 2009 at 07:08:15
“You don't pay "hundreds" for health insurance. You pay THOUSANDS!”
Gods Bless America! Queens NY GOP Won't Dump Pagan Candidate
Commented Sep 29, 2009 at 12:36:50 in New York
“It's not Thorism, but I guess it's better than some religions.
Praise Thor.”
Praise Thor.”
Tea Party Founder Announces: "A Huffington Post Of Our Own"
Commented Sep 28, 2009 at 03:11:38 in Politics
“Congratulations on finding the least sensical statement possible.”
warriorpatriot replied on Sep 28, 2009 at 03:23:42
“oooooooh that one hurt ......”
Roy Blunt (R-MO) Tells Racism-Tinged Monkey Joke at DC Conference
Commented Sep 21, 2009 at 20:34:25 in Politics
“So the joke is that these poor, downtrodden British Imperialists couldn't play golf peacefully in a country they conquered and exploited, and he equates the GOP with the Brits and the Democrats with monkeys. Even without racial overtones, it speaks volumes of this man's conscience (as well as that of everyone there that agreed). I assume the Indians are the American people in this analogy. So the monkey Dems are ruining the imperialist invader GOP's attempts to subjugate the American public? I'm glad the monkeys are on my side.”
New Rule: You Can't Complain About Health Care Reform If You're Not Willing to Reform Your Own Health
Commented Sep 18, 2009 at 22:25:09 in Comedy
“Good luck finding a plan that covers that.”
Huero replied on Sep 18, 2009 at 23:57:49
“Why does insurance have to cover that? Can't some of this come out of our own pockets?”
Dosadi replied on Sep 18, 2009 at 23:09:26
“Seeing a good nutritionist is a bill worth paying. Very few doctors have any nutritional education or skills. It may sound crazy but this is true. See a nutritionist and your visits to the doctor will decrease, guaranteed.”
Jason Linkins Discusses Czars On MSNBC: "Nothing To Do With Russian Imperialism"
Commented Sep 17, 2009 at 22:06:02 in Politics
“I wasn't very concerned that Dick Cheney's office existed in a limbo between, and outside of, the Executive and Legislative branches and had little or no oversight, but I'm a little concerned that Obama has a Sub-Associate Under-Assitant to the Director of Homeland Security's Border Concerns Bureau that doesn't have to be approved by Congress.”
New TIME Cover on Glenn Beck Ignores Facts, and Worse
Commented Sep 17, 2009 at 17:29:42 in Media
“This is what's wrong with the entire MSM. They're so worried about appearing liberally biased that they have to give credence to any inane bs that conservatives put forth, no matter how ridiculous and easily discredited it is. And when reality rules in favor of liberals, they confuse the situation by pretending it's a matter of opinion. If a liberal said the earth was round and a conservative ranted and raved about it being flat, who knows which it really is? There's no such thing as objective reality.”
Czarist Nonsense
Commented Sep 14, 2009 at 20:47:19 in Politics
“I'm going to see if I can start the trend of referring to Obama as a "unicornist" whose special brand of "unicornism" is subverting our freedoms. I wonder if I could get it to stick. It's an -ism and it sounds scary, right?”
weatherwaxx replied on Sep 14, 2009 at 21:13:28
“Actually, it sounds kind of silly, but no more so than what's already out there.”
Czarist Nonsense
Commented Sep 14, 2009 at 20:45:12 in Politics
“I'm going to call you Saney because you sound sane.”
Fired Up and Ready to Go! A Tale of Two Cities
Commented Sep 12, 2009 at 23:33:32 in Politics
“In order to believe what you say you would have to actually be saying something. The protestors aren't actually saying anything. They're parroting buzzwords and slogans that have nothing to do with the debate.”
Joe Wilson and the 9/12 March: The Week That Decency Died?
Commented Sep 12, 2009 at 22:21:46 in Politics
“Unfortunately the general consensus is still that 9/11 was totally unavoidable and changed everything, as if there were no such thing as terrorism before that date. Therefore, the Bush Admin. can claim a mulligan and count the next seven years as a perfect record.”
tnlcallen replied on Sep 13, 2009 at 04:00:39
“Another point to be made is that Mr. Bush was president for 8 months at that point, and those attacks were planned long before he became President”
Loveforlife replied on Sep 12, 2009 at 22:59:20
“You kitty is cute.”
Joe Wilson and the 9/12 March: The Week That Decency Died?
Commented Sep 12, 2009 at 22:18:20 in Politics
“He's referring to the fact that on 9/11/2001 there were some terrorist attacks and a bunch people died. Or were you not aware?”
Stopthekilling replied on Sep 13, 2009 at 10:59:50
“Charlie Sheen's letter to the Pres says it all. Will Obama be on the right side of history or continue Bush's third term. So far he is continuing our descent into Fascism. Bush and Obama are puppets for the same global elitist group of oligarch banksters.”
tnlcallen replied on Sep 13, 2009 at 03:58:57
“Yes, and those groups sprung up overnight when President Bush was elected, and not a result of a Democrat administrations soft stance on terrorism for the preceding 8 years.”


