Edit Preferences
Logout
Necron99's Comments (79)
View Comments:
Sort:
1 - 25 of 79
Bennett: Limbaugh Wrong To Say He Hopes Obama Fails
Commented Jan 27, 2009 at 13:15:05 in Politics
“You don't know who Bill Bennett is, do you?”
Rev. Jeremiah Wright: 'I've Been Preaching The Same Thing For 40 Years'
Commented Nov 25, 2008 at 13:41:58 in Chicago
“While I agree with you re: the boogeyman, santa & jehovah, you ignorance on karma is pretty impressive. Karma is simply a naturalistic description of psychological fact, it is not some mystical force of the universe that smites bad people--that's the hollywood/reader's digest/strawman version.
The idea of karma is simply this: if you go around treating people badly, they will feel angry & sad & frustrated & treat others badly. If you treat others well, they will be happy & relaxed and more likely to treat others with friendliness and respect.
Sounds sorta like the golden rule, hunh?
Funny how that works.”
The idea of karma is simply this: if you go around treating people badly, they will feel angry & sad & frustrated & treat others badly. If you treat others well, they will be happy & relaxed and more likely to treat others with friendliness and respect.
Sounds sorta like the golden rule, hunh?
Funny how that works.”
mrwoodywest replied on Nov 25, 2008 at 13:59:06
“Thanks I get it now. Let me see if I truly understand. If all the GW Bush haters here would treat him well, he will be happy & relaxed and more likely to treat others with friendliness and respect. Is that correct?”
Fox News Wins Q3 Cable News Race
Commented Oct 02, 2008 at 17:01:57 in Media
“So, let me get this straight:
You used to treat your employees well because of your noblesse oblige, but now, citing as your reason "there is not one damn thing you or anyone can do about this" you're gonna fire 300 liberals because they are liberal?
You're too good to be true. If I didn't know just how short sighted & petty republicans can be, I'd think you might just be making all this up--I can think of several motivations, all of them at least dishonest--but let's assume you're being truthful.
Just keep talkin' sport. You're doing more good for the left than I could do in a thousand years.”
You used to treat your employees well because of your noblesse oblige, but now, citing as your reason "there is not one damn thing you or anyone can do about this" you're gonna fire 300 liberals because they are liberal?
You're too good to be true. If I didn't know just how short sighted & petty republicans can be, I'd think you might just be making all this up--I can think of several motivations, all of them at least dishonest--but let's assume you're being truthful.
Just keep talkin' sport. You're doing more good for the left than I could do in a thousand years.”
tangerinesong replied on Oct 02, 2008 at 17:13:25
“Will do Hoss, with Mucho GUSTO.
Now, try and figure out what it is we manufacture domestically that you use everyday there Einstein? Yup, that be us and thanks for your business.”
Now, try and figure out what it is we manufacture domestically that you use everyday there Einstein? Yup, that be us and thanks for your business.”
Sandra Bernhard Cut From Benefit After Palin Gang-Rape Joke
Commented Oct 02, 2008 at 16:04:32 in Entertainment
“I guess that means McCain isn't a republican then?”
Modernized Taliban Thriving In Afghanistan
Commented Sep 20, 2008 at 11:55:35 in Politics
“Um...Anthrax?
& how long did it take between the first WTC attack & the second (with, I assume you would say, the democrats doing nothing/not enough)? I believe it was about 8 years.
How long has Bush been protecting us now? How well was he protecting us when he said "Now you've covered your ass"? Did you believe Condi when she said "no one would have imagined they would use airplanes as weapons"?
Having said all that--I'm more likely to be struck by a piece of falling space debris than I am to be the victim of islamic terrorism--largely because they can't afford the plane ticket--not because of Bush's "protection."
Got fear? Got xenophobia?”
& how long did it take between the first WTC attack & the second (with, I assume you would say, the democrats doing nothing/not enough)? I believe it was about 8 years.
How long has Bush been protecting us now? How well was he protecting us when he said "Now you've covered your ass"? Did you believe Condi when she said "no one would have imagined they would use airplanes as weapons"?
Having said all that--I'm more likely to be struck by a piece of falling space debris than I am to be the victim of islamic terrorism--largely because they can't afford the plane ticket--not because of Bush's "protection."
Got fear? Got xenophobia?”
rwe replied on Sep 20, 2008 at 12:06:01
“Anthrax? are you on anthrax? Islamo fascists are waiting for Obama.”
While Rome Burned...They Talked About Lipstick
Commented Sep 11, 2008 at 11:18:29 in Politics
“Since this is already 3 pages in, I guess this response is just for you sport:
Mebbe because PNAC was shopping the idea that we needed a "New Pearl Harbor (TM)" around to the neocons...?
Mebbe because of "Bin Laden determined to strike US"
Mebbe because some of us did not perfectly well this was a pack of lies from the beginning...
Mebbe because of hundreds of thousands dead & millions displaced for a lie...
Mebbe because of the worlds good will & our peace dividened squandered again & again & again so that daddy warbucks can have that shark tank bar for his penthouse in Dubai...
Jesus it must be sad to be you.”
Mebbe because PNAC was shopping the idea that we needed a "New Pearl Harbor (TM)" around to the neocons...?
Mebbe because of "Bin Laden determined to strike US"
Mebbe because some of us did not perfectly well this was a pack of lies from the beginning...
Mebbe because of hundreds of thousands dead & millions displaced for a lie...
Mebbe because of the worlds good will & our peace dividened squandered again & again & again so that daddy warbucks can have that shark tank bar for his penthouse in Dubai...
Jesus it must be sad to be you.”
Rick Warren's Forum To Include Questions About Candidates' Personal Lives
Commented Aug 16, 2008 at 14:54:30 in Politics
“"I have gained this by philosophy: that I do without being commanded what others do only from fear of the law."
- Aristotle
Or fear of God. Atheists & Agnostics act morally out of choice & judgment, not fear of punishment.
You choose how you want to live & what you want to be afraid of.
Personally, invisible sky fairies rate pretty low on my list of things that fill me with fear & trembling.”
- Aristotle
Or fear of God. Atheists & Agnostics act morally out of choice & judgment, not fear of punishment.
You choose how you want to live & what you want to be afraid of.
Personally, invisible sky fairies rate pretty low on my list of things that fill me with fear & trembling.”
highlyamused replied on Aug 16, 2008 at 15:42:50
“I have a stand about this.......IF they need a sky fairy to keep from killing their neighbors, raping, cheating etc etc............by all means let them keep their sky fairy.”
Russian forces still entrenched in Georgia
Commented Aug 16, 2008 at 14:34:59 in Politics
“Michale--
A whole post without a subtle ads hominem, a declaration that up is down, a suggestion that you are fair and balanced & the person you are disagreeing with is hysterical, an insincere entreaty to friendliness or civility, an assertion that because you are a gun-loving, surveillance defending, torture approving pro-Bush swinger that that makes you a liberal...
...& with a reputable source. I'm impressed.
...but I'm also gonna be paying special attention in case the sea turns to blood & sky opens to reveal trumpet wielding angels.”
A whole post without a subtle ads hominem, a declaration that up is down, a suggestion that you are fair and balanced & the person you are disagreeing with is hysterical, an insincere entreaty to friendliness or civility, an assertion that because you are a gun-loving, surveillance defending, torture approving pro-Bush swinger that that makes you a liberal...
...& with a reputable source. I'm impressed.
...but I'm also gonna be paying special attention in case the sea turns to blood & sky opens to reveal trumpet wielding angels.”
Michale32086 replied on Aug 16, 2008 at 14:50:13
“}}}}}}}}}}}}
I'm impressed.
{{{{{{{{{{{{
Uh... Thanx... :D
Michale.....”
I'm impressed.
{{{{{{{{{{{{
Uh... Thanx... :D
Michale.....”
President Bush Not So Good With American Flags
Commented Aug 16, 2008 at 11:37:35 in Politics
“No, no, no...the expression is "Moo," as in "the point is moo,"--like what a cow would say.
Get it right next time.”
Get it right next time.”
Obama Shifts, Says He May Back Offshore Drilling
Commented Aug 02, 2008 at 10:35:22 in Politics
“Are you familiar with the term "Begging the question"?”
Obama Aides Ecstatic Over $52 Million Haul
Commented Jul 17, 2008 at 13:09:15 in Politics
“You know the old saying, "As goes Puerto Rico, so goes the nation."”
humuhumunukunukuapuaa replied on Jul 17, 2008 at 13:22:46
“As a person born and raised in Puerto Rico I can say you could not be more correct. Puerto Rico is inconsequential in November since residents of the island are not allowed to vote in the general election. Besides, most mainlanders do not even know Puerto Rican are US Citizens anyway.”
Hillary And Bill: We Aren't Going Anywhere
Commented Mar 29, 2008 at 15:19:03 in Politics
“I've seen you make this same comment half a dozen places now.
How do you think we're going to get two dollar gas? Make OPEC only charge us $50 a barrel, subsidize it on the backs of the poor? Not gonna happen.
Here's the deal: we don't run anything. We don't set prices. We are the customer (in republican terms, we are the 'mark'*)--we pay what it costs or we go home empty handed.
Somebody else been doing your shopping your whole life or...?
*I understand, btw, that Adams said, "Everything is worth what it's puchaser will pay," but that assumes a free market--and not a corporate welfare state.”
How do you think we're going to get two dollar gas? Make OPEC only charge us $50 a barrel, subsidize it on the backs of the poor? Not gonna happen.
Here's the deal: we don't run anything. We don't set prices. We are the customer (in republican terms, we are the 'mark'*)--we pay what it costs or we go home empty handed.
Somebody else been doing your shopping your whole life or...?
*I understand, btw, that Adams said, "Everything is worth what it's puchaser will pay," but that assumes a free market--and not a corporate welfare state.”
Hillary And Bill: We Aren't Going Anywhere
Commented Mar 29, 2008 at 15:19:03 in Politics
“I've seen you make this same comment half a dozen places now.
How do you think we're going to get two dollar gas? Make OPEC only charge us $50 a barrel, subsidize it on the backs of the poor? Not gonna happen.
Here's the deal: we don't run anything. We don't set prices. We are the customer (in republican terms, we are the 'mark'*)--we pay what it costs or we go home empty handed.
Somebody else been doing your shopping your whole life or...?
*I understand, btw, that Adams said, "Everything is worth what it's puchaser will pay," but that assumes a free market--and not a corporate welfare state.”
How do you think we're going to get two dollar gas? Make OPEC only charge us $50 a barrel, subsidize it on the backs of the poor? Not gonna happen.
Here's the deal: we don't run anything. We don't set prices. We are the customer (in republican terms, we are the 'mark'*)--we pay what it costs or we go home empty handed.
Somebody else been doing your shopping your whole life or...?
*I understand, btw, that Adams said, "Everything is worth what it's puchaser will pay," but that assumes a free market--and not a corporate welfare state.”
Rice Prices Jump 30 Per Cent To All-Time High
Commented Mar 29, 2008 at 13:26:42 in Business
“Revise history much?
First, you clearly are unfamiliar with the things you claim familiarity with...here's a hint: Soviet "communism" (as well as most other flavors) operated on "Five Year Plans." How's your memory on the rest of your points?
Ethanol is good...if it's done rationally, like, in say Brazil, where there is a net gain in energy using their process. Here, the debate has been distorted by Big Ag (Monsanto & their ilk) as almost everything is distorted by big business. So...massive subsidies for corn based ethanol for US farmers in new ag bill, rising corn prices (as there isn't enough corn to go around between food & fuel--per the plan), massive profits for all the big factory farmers--US & Mexican consumers get screwed as usual--and you're right, corn based ethanol is an energy loser in the grand scheme of things.
Not the environmentalists. Corporate welfare. Corporate criminals, as usual.
& that's how you like it.”
First, you clearly are unfamiliar with the things you claim familiarity with...here's a hint: Soviet "communism" (as well as most other flavors) operated on "Five Year Plans." How's your memory on the rest of your points?
Ethanol is good...if it's done rationally, like, in say Brazil, where there is a net gain in energy using their process. Here, the debate has been distorted by Big Ag (Monsanto & their ilk) as almost everything is distorted by big business. So...massive subsidies for corn based ethanol for US farmers in new ag bill, rising corn prices (as there isn't enough corn to go around between food & fuel--per the plan), massive profits for all the big factory farmers--US & Mexican consumers get screwed as usual--and you're right, corn based ethanol is an energy loser in the grand scheme of things.
Not the environmentalists. Corporate welfare. Corporate criminals, as usual.
& that's how you like it.”
ashabot replied on Mar 29, 2008 at 22:49:43
“TimmySlagle is like a man whose house is on fire telling the fireman where they can and cannot spray the fire hose. The question is not whether green technology is "good" for the economy. The question is what do we have to do to survive catastrophic global climate change.”
ashabot replied on Mar 29, 2008 at 22:49:43
“TimmySlagle is like a man whose house is on fire telling the fireman where they can and cannot spray the fire hose. The question is not whether green technology is "good" for the economy. The question is what do we have to do to survive catastrophic global climate change.”
TimmySlagle replied on Mar 29, 2008 at 14:30:26
“"if it's done rationally, like, in say Brazil"
Yes, Brazil is famous for it's rational public policies.
Ethanol works there for two reasons; It is in the tropics, so there is much more sunlight that can be converted into plant energy. Sugar can only be grown in a couple of US states.
Wages in Brazil are also notoriously low, and the sugar cane workers who provide the fuel stock earn only a buck and a quarter per hour.
Here in the US, where the wages are a little more substantial, petroleum does the labor, making Ethanol production a zero sum game. (It takes as much carbon energy to produce ethanol, as the ethanol contains).”
Yes, Brazil is famous for it's rational public policies.
Ethanol works there for two reasons; It is in the tropics, so there is much more sunlight that can be converted into plant energy. Sugar can only be grown in a couple of US states.
Wages in Brazil are also notoriously low, and the sugar cane workers who provide the fuel stock earn only a buck and a quarter per hour.
Here in the US, where the wages are a little more substantial, petroleum does the labor, making Ethanol production a zero sum game. (It takes as much carbon energy to produce ethanol, as the ethanol contains).”
TimmySlagle replied on Mar 29, 2008 at 14:30:26
“"if it's done rationally, like, in say Brazil"
Yes, Brazil is famous for it's rational public policies.
Ethanol works there for two reasons; It is in the tropics, so there is much more sunlight that can be converted into plant energy. Sugar can only be grown in a couple of US states.
Wages in Brazil are also notoriously low, and the sugar cane workers who provide the fuel stock earn only a buck and a quarter per hour.
Here in the US, where the wages are a little more substantial, petroleum does the labor, making Ethanol production a zero sum game. (It takes as much carbon energy to produce ethanol, as the ethanol contains).”
Yes, Brazil is famous for it's rational public policies.
Ethanol works there for two reasons; It is in the tropics, so there is much more sunlight that can be converted into plant energy. Sugar can only be grown in a couple of US states.
Wages in Brazil are also notoriously low, and the sugar cane workers who provide the fuel stock earn only a buck and a quarter per hour.
Here in the US, where the wages are a little more substantial, petroleum does the labor, making Ethanol production a zero sum game. (It takes as much carbon energy to produce ethanol, as the ethanol contains).”
Rice Prices Jump 30 Per Cent To All-Time High
Commented Mar 29, 2008 at 13:26:42 in Business
“Revise history much?
First, you clearly are unfamiliar with the things you claim familiarity with...here's a hint: Soviet "communism" (as well as most other flavors) operated on "Five Year Plans." How's your memory on the rest of your points?
Ethanol is good...if it's done rationally, like, in say Brazil, where there is a net gain in energy using their process. Here, the debate has been distorted by Big Ag (Monsanto & their ilk) as almost everything is distorted by big business. So...massive subsidies for corn based ethanol for US farmers in new ag bill, rising corn prices (as there isn't enough corn to go around between food & fuel--per the plan), massive profits for all the big factory farmers--US & Mexican consumers get screwed as usual--and you're right, corn based ethanol is an energy loser in the grand scheme of things.
Not the environmentalists. Corporate welfare. Corporate criminals, as usual.
& that's how you like it.”
First, you clearly are unfamiliar with the things you claim familiarity with...here's a hint: Soviet "communism" (as well as most other flavors) operated on "Five Year Plans." How's your memory on the rest of your points?
Ethanol is good...if it's done rationally, like, in say Brazil, where there is a net gain in energy using their process. Here, the debate has been distorted by Big Ag (Monsanto & their ilk) as almost everything is distorted by big business. So...massive subsidies for corn based ethanol for US farmers in new ag bill, rising corn prices (as there isn't enough corn to go around between food & fuel--per the plan), massive profits for all the big factory farmers--US & Mexican consumers get screwed as usual--and you're right, corn based ethanol is an energy loser in the grand scheme of things.
Not the environmentalists. Corporate welfare. Corporate criminals, as usual.
& that's how you like it.”
ashabot replied on Mar 29, 2008 at 22:49:43
“TimmySlagle is like a man whose house is on fire telling the fireman where they can and cannot spray the fire hose. The question is not whether green technology is "good" for the economy. The question is what do we have to do to survive catastrophic global climate change.”
ashabot replied on Mar 29, 2008 at 22:49:43
“TimmySlagle is like a man whose house is on fire telling the fireman where they can and cannot spray the fire hose. The question is not whether green technology is "good" for the economy. The question is what do we have to do to survive catastrophic global climate change.”
TimmySlagle replied on Mar 29, 2008 at 14:30:26
“"if it's done rationally, like, in say Brazil"
Yes, Brazil is famous for it's rational public policies.
Ethanol works there for two reasons; It is in the tropics, so there is much more sunlight that can be converted into plant energy. Sugar can only be grown in a couple of US states.
Wages in Brazil are also notoriously low, and the sugar cane workers who provide the fuel stock earn only a buck and a quarter per hour.
Here in the US, where the wages are a little more substantial, petroleum does the labor, making Ethanol production a zero sum game. (It takes as much carbon energy to produce ethanol, as the ethanol contains).”
Yes, Brazil is famous for it's rational public policies.
Ethanol works there for two reasons; It is in the tropics, so there is much more sunlight that can be converted into plant energy. Sugar can only be grown in a couple of US states.
Wages in Brazil are also notoriously low, and the sugar cane workers who provide the fuel stock earn only a buck and a quarter per hour.
Here in the US, where the wages are a little more substantial, petroleum does the labor, making Ethanol production a zero sum game. (It takes as much carbon energy to produce ethanol, as the ethanol contains).”
TimmySlagle replied on Mar 29, 2008 at 14:30:26
“"if it's done rationally, like, in say Brazil"
Yes, Brazil is famous for it's rational public policies.
Ethanol works there for two reasons; It is in the tropics, so there is much more sunlight that can be converted into plant energy. Sugar can only be grown in a couple of US states.
Wages in Brazil are also notoriously low, and the sugar cane workers who provide the fuel stock earn only a buck and a quarter per hour.
Here in the US, where the wages are a little more substantial, petroleum does the labor, making Ethanol production a zero sum game. (It takes as much carbon energy to produce ethanol, as the ethanol contains).”
Yes, Brazil is famous for it's rational public policies.
Ethanol works there for two reasons; It is in the tropics, so there is much more sunlight that can be converted into plant energy. Sugar can only be grown in a couple of US states.
Wages in Brazil are also notoriously low, and the sugar cane workers who provide the fuel stock earn only a buck and a quarter per hour.
Here in the US, where the wages are a little more substantial, petroleum does the labor, making Ethanol production a zero sum game. (It takes as much carbon energy to produce ethanol, as the ethanol contains).”
Elizabeth Banks Cast As Laura Bush In Oliver Stone Movie
Commented Mar 26, 2008 at 17:21:58 in Entertainment
“Um...you haven't been following Oliver Stone's career, have you...?”
Elizabeth Banks Cast As Laura Bush In Oliver Stone Movie
Commented Mar 26, 2008 at 17:21:58 in Entertainment
“Um...you haven't been following Oliver Stone's career, have you...?”
A Collection Of Hateful Comments That Can Be Found On Fox News' Website
Commented Mar 21, 2008 at 16:39:38 in Politics
“There is a link to the story.
I found it. Why can't you?”
I found it. Why can't you?”
amanda85 replied on Mar 23, 2008 at 16:32:52
“"I found it. Why can't you?"
Insufficient IQ...”
Insufficient IQ...”
amanda85 replied on Mar 23, 2008 at 16:32:52
“"I found it. Why can't you?"
Insufficient IQ...”
Insufficient IQ...”
GeorgeKaplan replied on Mar 21, 2008 at 22:08:03
“BME”
GeorgeKaplan replied on Mar 21, 2008 at 22:08:03
“BME”
schutz1619 replied on Mar 21, 2008 at 19:08:43
“Not everyone reading this page will necessarily know what "Crooks and Liars" is; I certainly did not.
At the time iIposted the original comment above about a lack of link, there was none. I assume that HuffPost corrected that problem as a result of an email that I sent to them, since the story title now links to the story itself, which it did not earlier.
It is such a shame that some readers feel the need to be really rude when someone posts a perfectly reasonable question.”
At the time iIposted the original comment above about a lack of link, there was none. I assume that HuffPost corrected that problem as a result of an email that I sent to them, since the story title now links to the story itself, which it did not earlier.
It is such a shame that some readers feel the need to be really rude when someone posts a perfectly reasonable question.”
schutz1619 replied on Mar 21, 2008 at 19:08:43
“Not everyone reading this page will necessarily know what "Crooks and Liars" is; I certainly did not.
At the time iIposted the original comment above about a lack of link, there was none. I assume that HuffPost corrected that problem as a result of an email that I sent to them, since the story title now links to the story itself, which it did not earlier.
It is such a shame that some readers feel the need to be really rude when someone posts a perfectly reasonable question.”
At the time iIposted the original comment above about a lack of link, there was none. I assume that HuffPost corrected that problem as a result of an email that I sent to them, since the story title now links to the story itself, which it did not earlier.
It is such a shame that some readers feel the need to be really rude when someone posts a perfectly reasonable question.”
A Collection Of Hateful Comments That Can Be Found On Fox News' Website
Commented Mar 21, 2008 at 16:39:38 in Politics
“There is a link to the story.
I found it. Why can't you?”
I found it. Why can't you?”
amanda85 replied on Mar 23, 2008 at 16:32:52
“"I found it. Why can't you?"
Insufficient IQ...”
Insufficient IQ...”
amanda85 replied on Mar 23, 2008 at 16:32:52
“"I found it. Why can't you?"
Insufficient IQ...”
Insufficient IQ...”
GeorgeKaplan replied on Mar 21, 2008 at 22:08:03
“BME”
GeorgeKaplan replied on Mar 21, 2008 at 22:08:03
“BME”
schutz1619 replied on Mar 21, 2008 at 19:08:43
“Not everyone reading this page will necessarily know what "Crooks and Liars" is; I certainly did not.
At the time iIposted the original comment above about a lack of link, there was none. I assume that HuffPost corrected that problem as a result of an email that I sent to them, since the story title now links to the story itself, which it did not earlier.
It is such a shame that some readers feel the need to be really rude when someone posts a perfectly reasonable question.”
At the time iIposted the original comment above about a lack of link, there was none. I assume that HuffPost corrected that problem as a result of an email that I sent to them, since the story title now links to the story itself, which it did not earlier.
It is such a shame that some readers feel the need to be really rude when someone posts a perfectly reasonable question.”
schutz1619 replied on Mar 21, 2008 at 19:08:43
“Not everyone reading this page will necessarily know what "Crooks and Liars" is; I certainly did not.
At the time iIposted the original comment above about a lack of link, there was none. I assume that HuffPost corrected that problem as a result of an email that I sent to them, since the story title now links to the story itself, which it did not earlier.
It is such a shame that some readers feel the need to be really rude when someone posts a perfectly reasonable question.”
At the time iIposted the original comment above about a lack of link, there was none. I assume that HuffPost corrected that problem as a result of an email that I sent to them, since the story title now links to the story itself, which it did not earlier.
It is such a shame that some readers feel the need to be really rude when someone posts a perfectly reasonable question.”
Captive Archbishop's Body Found in Iraq
Commented Mar 13, 2008 at 17:38:55 in Politics
“Glad you asked.
Yes, as a matter of fact, the republican party is murdering thousands of people.
Or do brown people far away not count?”
Yes, as a matter of fact, the republican party is murdering thousands of people.
Or do brown people far away not count?”
williamscody replied on Mar 13, 2008 at 23:12:09
“First of all, Arabs are caucasian. I'm glad we got that out of the way. Lastly, you should apologize tothe 150,000 people murdered for trivializing their deaths. Just because you hate anyone with different opinions than you does not mean you should take it out on them.”
Report: Rachael Ray Getting The Ax, King World Vehemently Denies
Commented Mar 13, 2008 at 17:31:57 in Media
Mark Penn: "Obama Really Can't Win The General Election"
Commented Mar 13, 2008 at 17:27:12 in Politics
“How is it getting beat when you win more delegates?
Perhaps I missed something.”
Perhaps I missed something.”
lanny6 replied on Mar 13, 2008 at 19:23:50
“Check your facts. You are wrong. Obama won.”
Jeremiah Wright, Obama's Pastor: "Hillary Ain't Never Been Called A N****r"
Commented Mar 13, 2008 at 16:55:12 in Politics
“Please google "Blowback"
On 9/11/01 3000 Americans died. I was alternately numb & furious for weeks after that happened. In Iraq, that many civilians are dying every few weeks--in a country with a population 1/10th of ours. I wonder how they feel?
Chickens do come home to roost. What happened on 9/11 was criminal, monsterous, and utterly predictable & yes, it did have something to do with the US Government murdering millions of people throughout the arab world for decades--also criminal, monsterous.
"Battle not with monsters, lest you become a monster."
We should look in the mirror sometime, those hard lumps on our neck are bolts.”
On 9/11/01 3000 Americans died. I was alternately numb & furious for weeks after that happened. In Iraq, that many civilians are dying every few weeks--in a country with a population 1/10th of ours. I wonder how they feel?
Chickens do come home to roost. What happened on 9/11 was criminal, monsterous, and utterly predictable & yes, it did have something to do with the US Government murdering millions of people throughout the arab world for decades--also criminal, monsterous.
"Battle not with monsters, lest you become a monster."
We should look in the mirror sometime, those hard lumps on our neck are bolts.”
Ferraro: The Obama Camp Should Apologize To Me
Commented Mar 13, 2008 at 16:31:35 in Politics
“"What impression does that leave on the children?"
Are they made of play-doh? I always enjoyed taking impressions of Peanuts & Doonesbury myself.”
Are they made of play-doh? I always enjoyed taking impressions of Peanuts & Doonesbury myself.”
NotMyPrez replied on Mar 13, 2008 at 16:38:01
“Silly putty!”
Mayor Declares "Lou Dobbs Free Month"
Commented Mar 09, 2008 at 15:36:14 in Media
“Here's the deal on health care for illegals:
They aren't leaving--big business wouldn't like it.
They're already getting health care--at emergency room prices.
Giving them Universal Health Care (which neither dem is promising), would still be cheaper.
Please let me know which piece of my logic is wrong.”
They aren't leaving--big business wouldn't like it.
They're already getting health care--at emergency room prices.
Giving them Universal Health Care (which neither dem is promising), would still be cheaper.
Please let me know which piece of my logic is wrong.”
1 - 25 of 79
