“When you make a claim with no evidence you are often wrong.... as you are now.
I don't hate to hear the president referred to using the proper terminology so you're wrong there.
When he kills US citizens without due process ( or indefinitely detains them without due process ) he is violating the constitution. Just as President Bush did ( the indefinite detention part - it took this president to decide that he could sentence citizens to death without charge or trial - proving he did learn something from the Syrian government ).
I can come here and post ( I didn't snivel, but if it makes you feel grown up to cast aspersions that way have at it ).
I was opposed to the similar actions under the prior admin - you are wrong there too....”
“Wouldn't it be swell if there were any evidence presented before assuming a person were a terrorist?
So no, I don't know that any of the US citizens killed by the president, or the unknown number he has unilaterally decided deserved death sentences were Al Qaeda targets. The Most Transparent Adminstration Ever doesn't think we deserve to see evidence.
I don't think anyone is claiming all of these victims were terrorists:
"Surgical strike" probably doesn't sound as precise if you are one of the many civilians killed in the initial attack -- or one of the first responders killed in the follow-up targeting, not terrorists, but the first responders themeselves.”
ColleenHarper on Jun 17, 2012 at 23:01:44
“Ok, so my argument wasn't good enough for you. How does this sound - "I want all the terrorists to run freely without threat from the United States." Is that satisfactory for you, even though I don't believe a word of it?
Sorry. I'm pragmatic, not a sheeple that drinks deeply of the koolaid anyone offers. I'll stand by my previous statement, and I'll still have regrets for the collateral damage, i.e. the innocent lives lost. It's a decision that does NOT rest on my shoulders; that's why we gave that job to President Obama. Let him lose sleep over it. I shall not.”
“I'll do more homework for you. Prior to this administration it has been policy to identify the people we are trying to kill. President Obama doesn't care if we know who they are as long as they look like they are up to no good.
“Actually it's his job to uphold the constitution ( he took an oath, it was quite widely covered ).”
Bufford P Tusser on Jun 17, 2012 at 20:02:21
“And how did the duly elected President, the Commander in Chief, the POTUS ( I know you h8 to here him refered to in those terms) violate said sacred document, contitiuitonbreath?
He just acknowledged what anyone who has been payin attention knew a year ago.
It was quite widely covered,
You can't just come here and snivel every time Obama does something you don't approve of for no greater reason than he did it, when in fact had your hero, dubya done the same, it would produce w00d fur ya.
btw: I know rick johnson, rick is a friend of mine and you sir are no......
“What an interesting recurring theme that Romney shoud "send" his sons anywhere. I'd think self-identifying Democrats or Liberals or Progressives would be against anyone being "sent", but apparently not when it's an easy political statement.”
“I remember Bin Laden - I remember candidate Obama declaring that terrorists were criminals and would be tried in criminal courts. But that would have been an inconvenient return to the rule of law.”
99er2049er on Jun 17, 2012 at 14:25:09
“I did not agree with candidate Obama wanting to try terrorists like Bin Laden in criminal courts, but instead prefer military courts. I think this would have caused a lot of problems for New York. I instead prefer Obama's current method of taking out our worst enemies by killing them.”
“GM is #1 at what? Sincere question - there was a(nother) Biden lie/misstatement about GM being the largest company in the world, but I don't know of another category where GM is ranked first, happy to be corrected if you can provide the info.”
SeaRobb on Jun 17, 2012 at 16:03:45
“GM spent most of the bailout bucks in China.”
marinemomof3 on Jun 17, 2012 at 13:53:16
“You want ME to do YOUR RESEARCH??? Is your mom not home ?”
Not sure I follow the second sentence. The house has passed budget bills, and as far as I know nobody is crying - although the failure of the senate to act is likely to ( continue to ) be a campaign talking point.”
“Not unless Romney is the name of a third party candidate, that would be an interesting coincidence.”
FDRliberal on Jun 17, 2012 at 13:37:15
“Heard the same tired arguments in 2000. Hundreds of thousands in Iraq and thousands of US troop lives lost s a result and you would think folks would learn. And no of course Gore would not have launched a massive illegal invasion of Iraq.”