HuffPost Social News

Steamboater's Comments (1451)

View Comments:   Sort:
next
1 - 25 of 1451
huffingtonpost entry

Can the Obama White House Course-Correct in Time to Avoid Hitting the 2010 Iceberg?

Commented Dec 20, 2009 at 13:35:06 in Politics

“War aside, what we need for domestic policies is for someone to dig Lyndon Johnson up from his grave and install him in the Oval Office. Coarse and no intellectual, at least Johnson got things done and never would have put up with the crap from right-wing dems that Obama has nor worked so hard to appease republicans as Obama has. Johnson would have lifted Lieberman up by his ears as he did his pet beagle and read him the riot act a long time ago.”

billstewart replied on Dec 20, 2009 at 21:33:04

“There is no "war aside" - not only did Johnson radically escalate the Vietnam war and also the Cold War when the Pentagon wanted him to, and support dictators around the world if they were anti-Communist, which led to massive demonstrations by all of us then-young kids, you might remember that on the domestic front we had race riots in lots of big cities for a couple of years, and that wasn't just a result of Martin Luther King getting murdered.

He was able to do some things about civil rights, because he had the late Kennedy's name to wave around, and as a Southerner SOB he could say things that northern elitist liberals wouldn't get away with, and he pushed through a War on Poverty that didn't reduce a lot of poverty but appears to have had devastating effects on black families (who usually had fathers around in 1960.) Yeah, there were some positive results, and some things that took a long time when we'd have all hoped they'd be quick, but overall he was scarcely better than Nixon.”
huffingtonpost entry

Can the Obama White House Course-Correct in Time to Avoid Hitting the 2010 Iceberg?

Commented Dec 20, 2009 at 13:30:02 in Politics

“McCain would have sent more troops to Afghanistan getting us more heavily involved in that country's civil war than as we are now, disregarded a public option in healthcare reformand sucked up to Joe Liberman, not suspended DADT, not caved into pharmaceutical and health insurance companies because he naively believed in their ultimate good intentions like Obama but because he's in their pocket, and poverty would still be on the rise. As for blackwater, they're stil on the jon abroad and like McCain, Obama has refused to support prosecutions for Bush and Cheney and all the other higher-ups in the Bush administration who brought us the lies and ecits that got us into a war in Iraq. Take your blinders off and take a look at the real world around you.”
huffingtonpost entry

Can the Obama White House Course-Correct in Time to Avoid Hitting the 2010 Iceberg?

Commented Dec 20, 2009 at 13:17:41 in Politics

“Once the Titanic hit that iceberg, there was nothing anyone could do to save that ship and Obama's ship of state has already hit that iceberg, an iceberg with graffitti written on it--HEALTHCARE REFORM.

What we see in 'action' with Obama, and there's been as much effort on a public option in the healthcare bill from him as a couch potato puts into jogging, is that like Bush, Obama is all handlers. There was always something tentative about him during the primaries but like everyone else who voted for him, many of us gave him the benefit of the doubt. He's just not up for the job of the presidency. Weak, ineffectual and more interested in pleasing the crowds before him when he speaks, Obama's passion and willingness to take action and to the bully pulpit to show America as president that healthcare reform isn't some ruse to get votes like it was during the primaries has disappeared. He won the brass ring and doesn't have to work as hard at directing any attention to progressives any more except to have his henchmen imply that somehow Howard Dean is crazy and soothe the feelings of Gays and those who support them whenever he gets flack for DADT still on the books without even a suspension. That grand passion and will was never there of couse to begin with.”

Klad InVermont replied on Dec 20, 2009 at 17:54:52

“It's sad to say, but you're right on the mark. I think, we Liberals/Progressives are grappling with the realization that Obama has been nothing more than "smoke and mirrors".

God help us all, if his failures lead to a take over of our gov't by the Teabaggers!!!”
huffingtonpost entry

A Rebuttal to Howard Dean: I Am a U.S. Senator, and I Will Vote For This Bill

Commented Dec 20, 2009 at 02:58:22 in Politics

“So who gets the perks from this bill? Insurance companies, pharmaceutical companies and a bunch of rich people who won't be taxed for the luxury of getting botoxed, breast implants and tush tucks. (Born with a disfigurement or disfigured after an accident is something else. Those peole shouldn't be taxed.) Oh, and the GOP. They got what they wanted. All the former plus o public option. Just who won the White House after all?”

tom928 replied on Dec 20, 2009 at 03:49:11

“A sensible pragmatist interested in making real progress rather than whining about imperfection won the White House.”
huffingtonpost entry

A Rebuttal to Howard Dean: I Am a U.S. Senator, and I Will Vote For This Bill

Commented Dec 20, 2009 at 02:43:32 in Politics

“Reconciliation? Fat chance. The dems had their chance to do that and the DNC and the rest of them including Obama made reconciliation a taboo. If the dems refused to do it when they have such a large majority now, they won't and can't do it when that majority gets whittled down come the next election.”

viflyer replied on Dec 20, 2009 at 06:32:28

“Reed's a corporate shill. There will NEVER be reconcilliation. This is the result Reed wanted from the beginning. The whole sharade was designed to convince us that he REALLY wated something progressive. That is why he threw in the public option.

We are all suckers. And juding from the good Senators well rehearsed propaganda, you are all buying it. It just never fails.”
huffingtonpost entry

A Rebuttal to Howard Dean: I Am a U.S. Senator, and I Will Vote For This Bill

Commented Dec 20, 2009 at 02:39:41 in Politics

“Both of you are fanned.”

tom928 replied on Dec 20, 2009 at 03:45:52

“All three of you are unfanned.”
huffingtonpost entry

A Rebuttal to Howard Dean: I Am a U.S. Senator, and I Will Vote For This Bill

Commented Dec 20, 2009 at 02:35:51 in Politics

“And if you read any of my posts you'd have credibility. Right-winger? LOL With dems like you, who needs republicans? You're willing to give this bill and Obama and the dems a free pass because in a twisted way you think it might benefit the democratic party but in an even more twisted way, in reality, this bill benefits mostly the insurance and pharmaceutical companies. This bill is a pothole of deception given hype by the likes of Kirk and his ilk so they can stand up and say, 'See, we did something" when they could have done so much more if they hadn't caved in so easily to the fear of teabaggers whose primary political motivation relies on fear. The GOP may b*tch out loud about this bill, but privately these good ol' boys are slapping each others' backs and laughing at you and everyone who supports this bill. The joke's on you nkoo7”
huffingtonpost entry

A Rebuttal to Howard Dean: I Am a U.S. Senator, and I Will Vote For This Bill

Commented Dec 19, 2009 at 23:51:26 in Politics

“How are you going to bring the dead back from life after the 2010 elections? Instead of all that hope you put your faith in, try a little reality. Halthcare reform wit a public option isn't social change; it's a matter of lefe and death. When people have to make a decision as to skip taking badly needed meds and use them every other day ijnstead of twice daily or can't ven afford to buy them and the presient caves into the greed of pharmaceutical companies, no one wins ecept those who wanted real healthcare reform destroyed. You talk about all those americans who will have "access' to heathcare but if they have a preexisting condtion, insurance companies can charge them three times as much as anyone else (re: JHoward Dean, something Krik has avoided mentioning)., so those without wil stil be without.”
huffingtonpost entry

A Rebuttal to Howard Dean: I Am a U.S. Senator, and I Will Vote For This Bill

Commented Dec 19, 2009 at 23:26:56 in Politics

“Real healthcare reform is like DADT. Both were talked up by democrats to get our votes as if the second coming and real healthcare reform was left dirtied in the gutter by the president with his concessions to the pharma companies and DADT is still on the books when Obama could have at least been suspended it until it was overturned.”

ObamaSupporterPete replied on Dec 20, 2009 at 02:19:04

“I couldn't agree with you more. I donated a lot of money. Remember how the campaign would send you three or four emails a day urgently requesting funds by the noon deadline, the 5 pm deadline, the deadline on the 30th, the end of the quarter? We need your money to get the change we can believe in was the common refrain. Well, look at what we got? A few nice speeches on foreign policy, but for some reason he's whistling past the grave yard when anyone brings up DADT. They were so surprised that the GLBT community got a little angry that they wrote a brief in support of DOMA. Those weren't my only priorities. My biggest priority was true and meaingful health care reform. It was important. It was for everyone. It's the right thing to do. Anything that would lead to real cost saving has been eliminated by the Democratic Party. The GOP is obstructionist, the Democrats are actually working against us. Joe Lieberman has to have his moment of heart-stopping drama and pig-headed flip flop on the whole Meidcare buy-in, and then Aquanet Ben Nelson (I mean, really, what's up with that hair hat?) is getting snippy about one issue or another. And they are accommodated. It doesn't matter that it is bad policy and clearly designed to protect the already VERY profitable insurance companies.”
huffingtonpost entry

A Rebuttal to Howard Dean: I Am a U.S. Senator, and I Will Vote For This Bill

Commented Dec 19, 2009 at 23:12:49 in Politics

“Kirk talks as if the insurance companies are really at heart just corporations that need a little shove to do the right thing when in fact they were behind much of the teabagging shout-downs during the summer. They are the enemy of the people, not some public option that could have been pushed through reconciliation if the myth of bipartisanship hadn't been more important to Obama than real healthcare reform. "Public option" became dirty words in this White House, never sincerely taken on at the bully pulpit and only mentioned when Obama got so much flack from the media and progressives that he was forced to say something and what he said was never an impasioned comittment to it but just an attempt to salvage lost progressive votes. To paraphrase the title of that book about John Kennedy, "Barack, We Hardly Knew Thee".”

luling replied on Dec 20, 2009 at 07:27:36

“"Enemy of the people" ? I trust that is overheated rhetoric. That phrase can have lethal consequences when applied.”

Jezreel replied on Dec 20, 2009 at 00:07:12

“Co-signed!”
huffingtonpost entry

A Rebuttal to Howard Dean: I Am a U.S. Senator, and I Will Vote For This Bill

Commented Dec 19, 2009 at 22:23:49 in Politics

“What's shameful also is that theyhave full healthcare coverage that we pay for with our taxes when these very same senators refuse to give us something even closely substantial back in return.”

PJay1 replied on Dec 20, 2009 at 00:00:42

“Exactly!”

Lemeritus replied on Dec 19, 2009 at 22:32:49

“OUR country
OUR government
OUR representatives
OUR tax dollars

You wouldn't think we'd have to beg, would you?”
huffingtonpost entry

A Rebuttal to Howard Dean: I Am a U.S. Senator, and I Will Vote For This Bill

Commented Dec 19, 2009 at 22:07:26 in Politics

“And Kirk, you're also voting to cut millions if not billions from Medicare. How are your constituents who are seniors going to feel about that when it hits home?”

nk007 replied on Dec 20, 2009 at 01:59:08

“Peddling lies has become the tool of right wingers. This bill does not cut billions from Medicare. Rather, it cuts billions of federal government giveaways to insurance companies enacted by the Republican controlled Congress. How do I know this? I am one of those "constituents who are seniors" who has taken time to educate my self about this bill rather relying on right wing Propaganda. How ironic indeed that right wingers who vehemently opposed the creation of "socialist" Medicare are now, all of a sudden, posing as defenders of Medicare. Sorry, you have no credibility!”

Viper replied on Dec 19, 2009 at 22:27:49

“That is BS. What they are cutting is the 15% more the BUSH PRIVATE Medicare Advantage HMOs get paid by Medicare than regular medicare cost per person.These private Medicare providers were suppose to be cheaper and more efficient, but need to be subsidized???

They also pay DOCs/Hosipitals 20-30% less than medicare,, deny treatment 20% of the time and add 40% more overhead to offices dealing with getting your treatment approved with their employees in Indai and/or here getting a bonus when they deny treatment.



regards,,,”

margoharris replied on Dec 19, 2009 at 22:24:22

“They are cutting the waste and abuse of Medicare Advantage, that private insurance that the republicans pushed through. It costs 14% more.

Seniors will lose no benefits, in fact they will gain.”

curiousasheck replied on Dec 19, 2009 at 22:14:47

“How Kirk keep a straight face when he wrote this that's what I'd like to know.”
huffingtonpost entry

Tiger Woods IS Tiger Woods

Commented Dec 19, 2009 at 17:14:28 in Entertainment

“Just to follow up on my other post and that Tag Huer ad. Woods is doing his best to help young people but he helped design the Dubai golf course and when asked to speak out against the child sex trade there, he refused.”

MrBurlesk replied on Dec 20, 2009 at 04:57:49

“"...when asked to speak out against the child sex trade there, he refused."

I'm glad you're not letting go of this -- more people need to demand Tiger Woods take an official stand on this disgusting issue since he's so "in bed" with Dubai.”
huffingtonpost entry

Tiger Woods IS Tiger Woods

Commented Dec 19, 2009 at 17:11:34 in Entertainment

“I have mixed feelings about it actually. Woods set himslf up as this paragon of a family man and a family values icon. Tag Huer's latest ad in Vanity Fair has him the with a capton that says he's doing his best to help young people. Not exactly a role model for youth then. You can't use th media on the wy up, whether iin politics, the arts or sports etc and expect them to protect you on the way down either. I feel more sorry for Woods' wife and kids though. Sure, financially they''ll all come out of this without having to worry about money but the emotional damage, rich or not, on someone so betrayed must be very severe. How does someone go through that and come out trusting another lover or husband again?

BTW, Elayne, you're famous. You after chicks too? Wouldn't mind having you in the 'family'. :) Very funny lady.”
huffingtonpost entry

Tiger Woods IS Tiger Woods

Commented Dec 19, 2009 at 14:29:16 in Entertainment

“"The Man With The Golden Fly"
"Tiger Got Fingered"”
huffingtonpost entry

Tiger Woods IS Tiger Woods

Commented Dec 19, 2009 at 14:15:57 in Entertainment

“And a good film remake too--"Rich and Infamous".”
huffingtonpost entry

The 10 Best Years That Are Books

Commented Dec 19, 2009 at 02:02:45 in Books

“James Dalessandro's "1906", a novel about the great San Francisco earthquake and fire that consumed that city, is a must-read. It has slave ships, murder, corrupt politicians and lots of gilt and opera star Enrico Caruso thrown in (he was actually there at the time) for those who like some highbrow.”
huffingtonpost entry

The 10 Best Years That Are Books

Commented Dec 19, 2009 at 01:57:30 in Books

“Gore Vidal's "1876" is a superb novel about the presidential contest between Tilden and Hayes., the middle book in a trilogy with that of "Lincoln" which is also a terrific novell.”

gurukalehuru replied on Dec 19, 2009 at 12:29:31

“You beat me to this comment. An excellent book by an excellent writer.”
huffingtonpost entry

Feinstein and Hyde Pierce: A Bendel Bonnet, a Shakespeare Sonnet, Mickey Mouse

Commented Dec 17, 2009 at 04:48:30 in New York

“Micheal Feinsten. I love that guy. When he appeared in the salute to Jerry Herman at the Hollywood Bowl, he did something I had never heard another singer do and that was when he sang one of my favorite songs, "I Won't Send Roses" from the broadway musical "Mac and Mabel", at the end he sang the last word very quietly and held it for so long I didn't think he had another breath in him but then suddenly, withuh taking a breath or inhaling, he ratcheted up the power and that quiet vocie belted to the end. Amazing. I have most of his CDs and wonder if a CD of the Feinstein/Pierce performance will hit the shelves and soon too.”
huffingtonpost entry

With The Rise of Social Media, No Privacy for Tiger Woods

Commented Dec 16, 2009 at 15:57:39 in Technology

“Sure, Woods set himself up as this icon of stability and amercian values and american values aside, because infidelity is as about american as apple pie. you can't expect the media or the net to not take notice when you want them to help you on the way up but look away when you've gone out of your way to kick the ladder out from under yourself on the way down.”
huffingtonpost entry

With The Rise of Social Media, No Privacy for Tiger Woods

Commented Dec 16, 2009 at 15:53:52 in Technology

“It's always been like this and it doesn't matter if it's a tabloid or the mainstream media that reports private matters that become public because someone thought more with his privates than his brain. As to the net, what you put on it is there forever. It's like marriage, if you have any idea as to commiting to it, don't do it.”
Is Blu-ray That Red-Hot?

Is Blu-ray That Red-Hot?

Commented Dec 15, 2009 at 15:54:21 in Entertainment

“Nah. I have both Blu-rays and a 50" plasma TV. I don't see much of a difference and my vision is 20/20. Very satisfied without the Blu-rays.and sorry I bought a Blu-ray player.”
Is Blu-ray That Red-Hot?

Is Blu-ray That Red-Hot?

Commented Dec 15, 2009 at 00:23:41 in Entertainment

“Walmart is selling a Magnavox Blu-ray player for $78.00 now but the prices of Blu-ray dvd's haven't come down.”

lukebenward replied on Dec 15, 2009 at 10:04:14

“Yeah, but have you noticed that Disney has started to offer "DVD/Blu-ray Combo Pack" for their offerings? They price of the DVD is actually essentially the price for the BLU-RAY while the DVD only makes up the 3 or 4 dollars you pay. They word it so it's like the Blu-ray is the "bonus", when it's the other way around. All while up-saling the price.”
Is Blu-ray That Red-Hot?

Is Blu-ray That Red-Hot?

Commented Dec 15, 2009 at 00:22:44 in Entertainment

“I've bought only a few Blu-ray films and I really don't see the difference between them and regular DVDs, not on a plasma TV at least that has1080 pixels. Blu-rays are too expensive anyway. I also like to watch foreign films and the range of films offered, both foreign and domestic, aren't that great.”

ChrisR replied on Dec 15, 2009 at 10:29:51

“Sorry - it's like night and day. It's like comparing the first Who CD's from the 80's with the remasters of the 00's.
If you can't see the difference, your system is defective. Or your vision is impaired. Seriously.
Blu ray is astounding.”
huffingtonpost entry

What If Santa Were Gay?

Commented Dec 12, 2009 at 14:46:03 in Politics

“Any guy who wears a red suit trimmed in white fur and who carries a bag of 'toys' has to be Gay anyway. :)”
next
1 - 25 of 1451