SwingingFromCenter's Comments (154)
Anatomy (and Meaning) of the "Did You Know?" Video Series (VIDEOS, PHOTOS)
Commented Nov 25, 2009 at 00:01:27 in Technology
“Kind of old news, but always liked the vids.”
Did Pacquiao Make Web History?
Commented Nov 15, 2009 at 11:58:00 in Technology
“Floyd vs. Manny would never happen for one reason: Manny wouldn't stand a chance. Floyd's defense is as such to where you can never actually hit the guy. There's a reason he's never been legitimately put on the canvas.”
patbernstein replied on Nov 15, 2009 at 20:12:14
“Mayweather will get crushed by pac. I have been the biggest pac man nay sayer, but no more. I can*t deny how good he is anymore. Mayweather has zero power, so he will not be able to keep pac from walking him down, like he did to cotto. Mayweather has zero chance.”
DFutureIsNow replied on Nov 15, 2009 at 14:09:47
“Floyd has been running away from manny for years, he could have fought manny before he fought Marquez, Manny is willing and able... if Floyd ever shows up”
Why I'm Optimistic About Maine
Commented Oct 18, 2009 at 02:38:55 in Politics
“Where you fail in your logic is that there is a genetic predisposition towards being straight or not. If someone is genetically predisposed to not be straight, then it is unconscionable and unlawful to restrict that person's right to "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness", if their definition o fhappiness is to have a family with a partner that they find amenable as a life mate.”
Why I'm Optimistic About Maine
Commented Oct 17, 2009 at 14:52:15 in Politics
“Simplistic thinking from a simpleton. Note what I said. I find it hard to believe that ALL they needed was money.”
JohnJames replied on Oct 17, 2009 at 15:20:07
“I don't know what the point of your original comment was about "the movement". I do know that gay people get slammed in this struggle no matter what they do - All they can do is give money (What kind of civil rights movement is that?) Don't those obnoxious gays protesting in the streets know how bad they look? ( Can't they knock off the drama?). Some gays don't vote based on gay rights (If they don't care about their rights, why should I?). All gays do is care about their rights (I'd support them if they weren't so selfish.) etc. etc. etc.”
Why I'm Optimistic About Maine
Commented Oct 17, 2009 at 12:39:15 in Politics
“I hope 1 fails. I really do. But optimism and hope don't alter reality, and reality says nobody knows. This piece is a good analysis, but trying to divine which way this thing is going to go is little more than speaking with spirits to learn next week's Powerball numbers.
I jsut find it hard to believe that all "the movement" needed to get these things passed was money.”
I jsut find it hard to believe that all "the movement" needed to get these things passed was money.”
JohnJames replied on Oct 17, 2009 at 13:02:00
“Yeah. Who ever heard of money accomplishing anything, like paying for messages about the reality of gay families that might change hearts and minds? Who thought of that crazy idea?”
exxman replied on Oct 17, 2009 at 12:50:14
“You're joking, right?”
Goldman Sachs' Black Magic, Here's How They Did It
Commented Oct 17, 2009 at 11:57:54 in Business
“Yeah, it stinks how they did it. But they did it and no amount of screaming is going to change it. Those of us with brains larger than that of a pea said this exact thing was goin to happen when the TARP money started being handed out like candy. We knew that money that was being given out so that these places could disperse money TO THE PEOPLE would instead just buy the remnants of their disaster for pennies on the dollar, wait for the values to reinflate, and then pocket the cash. And that's exactly how it went down.
And the government let it happen. Not Republicans. Not Democrats. Government. They all had a hand in it.”
And the government let it happen. Not Republicans. Not Democrats. Government. They all had a hand in it.”
NotMcCain replied on Oct 17, 2009 at 18:36:18
“Some--like Henry Paulson and Ben Bernanke--deserve the LION'S Share of the blame (and GWB for being too stupid to understand it--and too stupid to care.")
No one should forget. And no one should give up.
There are still a few watchdogs--and a few honest people like Elizabeht Warren--trying to make a difference.
We shouldn't give up. We should write, blog, call the WH, call Congress---anything we can to show that we DO get it and we DO care!!!!!!”
No one should forget. And no one should give up.
There are still a few watchdogs--and a few honest people like Elizabeht Warren--trying to make a difference.
We shouldn't give up. We should write, blog, call the WH, call Congress---anything we can to show that we DO get it and we DO care!!!!!!”
A Funny Thing Happened on My Way to Talk About Afghanistan
Commented Oct 16, 2009 at 00:48:18 in Media
“This just in: We still don't have a health care plan!
This just in: We're still in Afghanistan!
This just in: The housing market is still in the toi.let!
This just in: Democrats are still spineless, and Republicans are still cra.zy!
Same story, different day. When something big happens or changes, let me know. Until then, I'm tired of hearing it.”
This just in: We're still in Afghanistan!
This just in: The housing market is still in the toi.let!
This just in: Democrats are still spineless, and Republicans are still cra.zy!
Same story, different day. When something big happens or changes, let me know. Until then, I'm tired of hearing it.”
A Funny Thing Happened on My Way to Talk About Afghanistan
Commented Oct 15, 2009 at 23:25:55 in Media
“Maybe it's because we've heard "stories" on all the "more important" things ad infinitum, and we're burned out on them? I didn't much care for this balloon story either, but it at least it was something different than the same stuff I hear every day.”
FHTB replied on Oct 16, 2009 at 00:31:32
“Well, maybe it's how that "same stuff" is presented that causes ennui for so many...maybe because it is presented so poorly and with so little intelligent insight...still, this does not excuse the silliness of this story, which turned out to be a non-story, and worse, a possible hoax.”
SlappHappy replied on Oct 15, 2009 at 23:54:46
“Anything to distract you, huh? Very sad.”
gifu replied on Oct 15, 2009 at 23:36:21
“Swinging from the vines is more like it. As long as it is something different? With standards like that.........”
rumblingspire replied on Oct 15, 2009 at 23:36:18
“the kid was not in the balloon. where is the story?”
Twayn replied on Oct 15, 2009 at 23:31:27
“Well I think this is just... oh, look. Something shiny.”
Lack of Legal Help: One More Way the Deck Is Stacked Against Homeowners
Commented Oct 06, 2009 at 23:28:38 in Business
“Wait, so you're saying you shouldn't be held responsible because nobody told you to seek legal advice? You needed to be TOLD that to do it?”
Antiks replied on Oct 10, 2009 at 13:36:08
“The government should be on it. It's real easy to kick people when they're down, no?”
Lack of Legal Help: One More Way the Deck Is Stacked Against Homeowners
Commented Oct 06, 2009 at 23:26:44 in Business
“But that's not what they're asking for. They're asking for the PRINCIPLE on their loan to be reduced. Not to have their payments stretched out, they want to be essentially given 50 grand or a hundred grand or whatever it is they want to pay for their home's lost value.”
Lack of Legal Help: One More Way the Deck Is Stacked Against Homeowners
Commented Oct 06, 2009 at 21:32:28 in Business
“They're only "victims" because their conscious or ignorant gamble didn't pay off.”
blacksmithn replied on Oct 06, 2009 at 22:27:07
“Wrong again, Mr. Paints-With-Too-Broad-A-Brush. Lots of folks bought houses that they could afford at the time, being assured by the banker and the mortgage broker and the real estate agent that they were getting a good deal and that they could always refinance in a couple years if things got tight because the money spigot would be ever flowing. It sounded good and the pros were all hyping the great deal and benefits of home ownership, plus who wouldn't want to own their own place-- after all it's the American Dream. They were assured by all and sundry that this was no gamble, this was a sure fire winner on the path to success.
It was only when the bubble burst that they found out that the dream could turn nightmarish in short order. Then all the pros who were so anxious to get them into this great deal didn't want to have anything to do with them except to foreclose when they couldn't keep up with the by now exorbitant payments.
So yeah, Sparky, victims I said and victims I meant.”
It was only when the bubble burst that they found out that the dream could turn nightmarish in short order. Then all the pros who were so anxious to get them into this great deal didn't want to have anything to do with them except to foreclose when they couldn't keep up with the by now exorbitant payments.
So yeah, Sparky, victims I said and victims I meant.”
Lack of Legal Help: One More Way the Deck Is Stacked Against Homeowners
Commented Oct 06, 2009 at 10:17:59 in Business
“2 years ago at the peak of this thing, all of you renters-turned-buyers were laughing all the way to the bank, buying too much house for what you could afford on those silly "interest only" loans that clearly said your payments would triple after 2 years. You cackled with glee as you took out home equity lines of credit on your "investment", putting yourselves even more in debt as the value of the house skyrocketed. You all went out and spent, spent, spent! buying new BMW's, fishing boats, stainless steel kitchen appliances and vacations, thinking you had struck gold. Sure, the payments were gonna triple after 2 years, but you'd just refinance at that point or else flip the house. After all, you weren't middle class anymore! You had gamed the system into letting you into the upper class with those of us who worked our tails off.
Now, 2 years later as your mortgage has gone sour, your house is upside-down and your monthly mortgage payment is more than you've EVER earned in a month (supposing you're even still working), you cry foul and say it was unfair and everybody tricked you, you didn't know better. You hold out your hands looking for more free money while decrying the fact that the banks are doing the same thing you're doing.
And the worst part is, you expect those of us who were responsible to be the ones to bail you out. Can't have it both ways”
Now, 2 years later as your mortgage has gone sour, your house is upside-down and your monthly mortgage payment is more than you've EVER earned in a month (supposing you're even still working), you cry foul and say it was unfair and everybody tricked you, you didn't know better. You hold out your hands looking for more free money while decrying the fact that the banks are doing the same thing you're doing.
And the worst part is, you expect those of us who were responsible to be the ones to bail you out. Can't have it both ways”
Max17 replied on Oct 10, 2009 at 16:55:30
“Sounds like Republicans with their spending the previous 8 years. An additional $6 trillion added to the debt as Republicans "spent, spent, spent...cackling with glee".”
Antiks replied on Oct 10, 2009 at 13:45:25
“If it wasn't for banks offering scammy financing, houses would never have sold like hotcakes. It's the BANKS' fault, not the borrow. The banks hold all the cards and set up the terms and conditions for payments. The fact of the matter is they got greedy and took huge risks, and our entire economy melted down as a result of their bad decisions.”
df2112 replied on Oct 07, 2009 at 23:27:04
“Spectacular.”
Tiggerchick replied on Oct 06, 2009 at 13:21:18
“I'm really confused abut one of the prevailing opinions being spouted by people. How does the bank modifying my mortgage to help me keep the house and keep money flowing to them affect the taxpayer? Mortgage modifications were not part of the bank bailout. Why do people feel so slighted that Sally Sue next door can get her mortgage modified? (not that she can, I'm just saying) If you're gainfully employed, are comfortable with your mortgage payments, you're making ends meet, why do you give a crap? Are you a shareholder in one of the "big 4" banks? Wait, even if you were, they all posted profits thanks to the government bailout, increasing APR's, increasing OD fees, and deregulation as a whole. Why aren't you happy for Sally Sue next door that she can keep a roof over her head, her children's head? I don't get it.”
dianhow replied on Oct 06, 2009 at 11:33:52
“SWing We can sit back and put all the blame on howeowners for over extending themselves-
yes- some did that. But that is not the main story. As a Realtor I saw ' predatory' lenders . who told buyers - ' no problem- when the ARM mortgage adjusts - - just refinance . Then in Fall 2008
we had the Bush meltdown. 29 long yrs o f Reagan / BUsh deregulation 1981- 2008 had done its dirty work. That toxic policy LEGALIZED UNETHICAL DEALINGS ON WALL ST-and
LENDERS- BANKS. Lenders took on' bad' loans-and labeled them as TRIPLE A- that used to be illegal. Sold them to WAll ST and invetors around the globe. They vrashed- so did the world financial system. Prior to 1981- we had safe guards in place to prevent that abuse- Rreagan removed them. That is the GENESIS OF OUR COLLAPSE. NO one ewants to admit that- so we have NOT learned our lesson- that insures it will HAPPEN AGAIN. Millions are in denial. Obama did not create this disaster. Will he succeed in the coming 3 yrs ? We shall all see. Many say his much hated stimulous pkg prevented a DEEP DEPRESSION.
Folks are all upset he tried to get the Olympics- that is just a diversionary tactics- stop being manipulated folks. Thats how we wer tricked into Iraq Please Wake up before its too late.”
yes- some did that. But that is not the main story. As a Realtor I saw ' predatory' lenders . who told buyers - ' no problem- when the ARM mortgage adjusts - - just refinance . Then in Fall 2008
we had the Bush meltdown. 29 long yrs o f Reagan / BUsh deregulation 1981- 2008 had done its dirty work. That toxic policy LEGALIZED UNETHICAL DEALINGS ON WALL ST-and
LENDERS- BANKS. Lenders took on' bad' loans-and labeled them as TRIPLE A- that used to be illegal. Sold them to WAll ST and invetors around the globe. They vrashed- so did the world financial system. Prior to 1981- we had safe guards in place to prevent that abuse- Rreagan removed them. That is the GENESIS OF OUR COLLAPSE. NO one ewants to admit that- so we have NOT learned our lesson- that insures it will HAPPEN AGAIN. Millions are in denial. Obama did not create this disaster. Will he succeed in the coming 3 yrs ? We shall all see. Many say his much hated stimulous pkg prevented a DEEP DEPRESSION.
Folks are all upset he tried to get the Olympics- that is just a diversionary tactics- stop being manipulated folks. Thats how we wer tricked into Iraq Please Wake up before its too late.”
WilliamProc replied on Oct 06, 2009 at 11:28:10
“Banks, silly person. Banks are the ones responsible for this mess and YOU know it.
Banks made the loans and approved them, not the homeowners. Would you loan money to someone who didn't make enough to pay you back? Of course not, but the banks did. The banks got the bailout money and kept it, assisted as few homeowners as they could, just enough of them to say that they helped someone-on paper.
You lay the blame on the lendee and you are lying to yourself.”
Banks made the loans and approved them, not the homeowners. Would you loan money to someone who didn't make enough to pay you back? Of course not, but the banks did. The banks got the bailout money and kept it, assisted as few homeowners as they could, just enough of them to say that they helped someone-on paper.
You lay the blame on the lendee and you are lying to yourself.”
hark replied on Oct 06, 2009 at 11:26:49
“Oh stop with the self-congratulations. You right wingers are utterly insufferable with your delusions about your virtues and rugged individualism. You are as dependent upon the bedrock of our society as everyone else. That you can't see that is pathetic.
You miss the point entirely. The individual does not have the resources to fight against the wealth and power of corporate America. They cannot, and should not, be expected to ferret out the dirty tricks and outright fraudulent schemes conducted by legions of corporate officers and lawyers who have unlimited funds. They have lives to live, children to raise, responsibilities to live up to. They don't have time to inspect every single product that they purchase for hidden defects and schemes perpetrated by corporations who deliberately mislead, lie and defraud them because they know they haven't the time, skills or resources to defend themselves.
That is one reason we have government.”
You miss the point entirely. The individual does not have the resources to fight against the wealth and power of corporate America. They cannot, and should not, be expected to ferret out the dirty tricks and outright fraudulent schemes conducted by legions of corporate officers and lawyers who have unlimited funds. They have lives to live, children to raise, responsibilities to live up to. They don't have time to inspect every single product that they purchase for hidden defects and schemes perpetrated by corporations who deliberately mislead, lie and defraud them because they know they haven't the time, skills or resources to defend themselves.
That is one reason we have government.”
blacksmithn replied on Oct 06, 2009 at 11:19:47
“Yeah, that's right-- blame the victim.”
spirit76 replied on Oct 06, 2009 at 11:14:10
“Well said.
I do support re-financing for troubled loans for the purpose of cutting down the available housing supply. I don't care if we give some of these fools 35-40 year mortgages at 5-6% to keep their house off the market.”
I do support re-financing for troubled loans for the purpose of cutting down the available housing supply. I don't care if we give some of these fools 35-40 year mortgages at 5-6% to keep their house off the market.”
blueken replied on Oct 06, 2009 at 11:07:56
“I just bought an annuity. I have a college degree, and I couldn't make heads or tails of the perspectis. Face it, those people on the other side of the table have superior knowledge. We need sensible regulations to protect the average guy. Of we can't trust the guy on the other side of the tabel the economy will freeze up. We need to know that our government is protecting our interests, not thiers. If we don't, people will start to just stick the money in a mattress. "Some men rob you with a six gun, some men rob you with a pen" Woody Guthry”
FloaterBall replied on Oct 06, 2009 at 10:33:18
“You have all the empathy of a monkey swinging from the center of a vine. And no more intelligence.”
lazercat2008 replied on Oct 06, 2009 at 10:28:41
“So you are saying the guy who bought the Brooklyn Bridge is the bad guy?”
Teaser FireCat replied on Oct 06, 2009 at 10:22:37
“Teaser: Reminds me of an old Heart song. Heartless - you know, “He thinks it’s so cool to be cold.”
FireCat: I’m thinking The Fool On The Hill.”
FireCat: I’m thinking The Fool On The Hill.”
Lack of Legal Help: One More Way the Deck Is Stacked Against Homeowners
Commented Oct 06, 2009 at 01:22:37 in Business
“Most of these people didn't hire attorneys, which is why I have zero sympathy for them. They just saw shiny new toys and a bright new house that could all be theirs with the flick of a pen, and they happily signed without asking any questions.
Their own fault.”
Their own fault.”
OgreDaddy replied on Oct 06, 2009 at 01:34:40
“I have no sympathy for the flippers and investors, but would reserve judgement on case by case situations for most 1st time buyers.
Yeah someone dangled the American Dream carrot in front of people's
noses and they went for it.
I had to jump through so many hoops the first time I bought.
I still find it amazing how far things went in the other direction.
The stoopidness was bountiful!”
Yeah someone dangled the American Dream carrot in front of people's
noses and they went for it.
I had to jump through so many hoops the first time I bought.
I still find it amazing how far things went in the other direction.
The stoopidness was bountiful!”
Lack of Legal Help: One More Way the Deck Is Stacked Against Homeowners
Commented Oct 06, 2009 at 01:19:28 in Business
“Yeah, the answer was to reward people who bought more house than they could ever reasonably afford by letting them KEEP their house. Riiight.
Rewardin bad decision making: An American tradition!”
Rewardin bad decision making: An American tradition!”
SmileAndActNice replied on Oct 06, 2009 at 23:50:37
“KEEP their house .... through the method of paying their mortgage, yes.
If it isn't possible to set the interest rate to something non-usurious (retroactively if necessary) and bring the monthly payment back into their budget you would move on to foreclosure.
They will still pay far more than their house is worth so they are punished for their stupidity since that is so important to you.
Meanwhile, the lenders make a lot less and are punished for either their stupidity in lending to that person in the first place or their greed in bait-and-switching with the intent of fleecing the mark for payments for a few years and then kicking him out of the house and selling it(theoretically at a profit since the value of the house will of course go up in the intervening years). Whichever one characterizes the loan doesn't matter, they both can be appropriately rewarded with 30 years of low yield gains.
Which I would much rather have done than TARP.”
If it isn't possible to set the interest rate to something non-usurious (retroactively if necessary) and bring the monthly payment back into their budget you would move on to foreclosure.
They will still pay far more than their house is worth so they are punished for their stupidity since that is so important to you.
Meanwhile, the lenders make a lot less and are punished for either their stupidity in lending to that person in the first place or their greed in bait-and-switching with the intent of fleecing the mark for payments for a few years and then kicking him out of the house and selling it(theoretically at a profit since the value of the house will of course go up in the intervening years). Whichever one characterizes the loan doesn't matter, they both can be appropriately rewarded with 30 years of low yield gains.
Which I would much rather have done than TARP.”
MSaxe replied on Oct 06, 2009 at 01:40:56
“Following your logic:
And reward the companies that loaned them the money knowing the couldn't pay with bailouts and bonuses. Reward the rating agencies that inflated the value of the pools of mortgages with no investigations or legal actions.”
And reward the companies that loaned them the money knowing the couldn't pay with bailouts and bonuses. Reward the rating agencies that inflated the value of the pools of mortgages with no investigations or legal actions.”
Lack of Legal Help: One More Way the Deck Is Stacked Against Homeowners
Commented Oct 06, 2009 at 01:03:48 in Business
“Wrong. Most foreclosures today are because people bought too much house on ARM's that were "interest only" for 2 years and then the payments tripled. People either didn't read their paperwork or foolishly thought that they'd be able to flip the house after 2 years.”
BradMaurer replied on Oct 06, 2009 at 01:14:57
“SwingingFromCenter -
This is not a sarcastic question, I am genuinely interested: where are you getting definitive numbers that show that a substantial number of foreclosures have been caused by people trying to flip a house in two years? I have been under the impression from all I've read that the combination of predatory lending, illness/injury/medical bills, and the sour economy is causing the vast majority of foreclosures, and there are some striking statistics suggesting this is the case.”
This is not a sarcastic question, I am genuinely interested: where are you getting definitive numbers that show that a substantial number of foreclosures have been caused by people trying to flip a house in two years? I have been under the impression from all I've read that the combination of predatory lending, illness/injury/medical bills, and the sour economy is causing the vast majority of foreclosures, and there are some striking statistics suggesting this is the case.”
Lack of Legal Help: One More Way the Deck Is Stacked Against Homeowners
Commented Oct 05, 2009 at 22:59:32 in Business
“Maybe they should have read their documents prior to signing, and evaluated whether they could really afford the house they were buying.
Distressed homeowners, with few exceptions, did this to themselves.”
Distressed homeowners, with few exceptions, did this to themselves.”
einherjar replied on Oct 05, 2009 at 23:51:26
“I and my significant other did read every line of our mortgage agreement and we were more than able to make our payment when we purchased our house 8 years ago.
The economy and the result of both of us losing our job(her unemployed for nearly 2 years now, myself for the last 8 months) has resulted in our receiving a foreclosure notice.
We were able to keep our head above water for the last two years but when I lost my job there was nothing left to cut for us to make ends meet.
So remind me again how reading the loan agreement would have helped me avoid this?”
The economy and the result of both of us losing our job(her unemployed for nearly 2 years now, myself for the last 8 months) has resulted in our receiving a foreclosure notice.
We were able to keep our head above water for the last two years but when I lost my job there was nothing left to cut for us to make ends meet.
So remind me again how reading the loan agreement would have helped me avoid this?”
Entitlement replied on Oct 05, 2009 at 23:34:14
“Interesting... I just read a definition for that term. It says that even caveat emptor wasn't supposed to apply to the purchase of homes. That was too low a blow even for that backward standard.”
Entitlement replied on Oct 05, 2009 at 23:31:33
“Caveat emptor??? Are you a Ferengi?”
Boadicea replied on Oct 05, 2009 at 23:25:10
“One of the most ignorant comments I've ever seen on HuffPo. As uninformed as they come, even in this country.”
BradMaurer replied on Oct 05, 2009 at 23:20:44
“SwingingFromCenter -
With respect, it's hard to say that "distressed homeowners, with few exceptions, did this to themselves" when the FBI has reported that 80% of "toxic" loans were initiated by predatory lenders who deliberately misled home-buyers. Take that along with the fact that many, many bankruptcies/foreclosures were caused by medical bills/skyrocketing healthcare costs, and the idea that homeowners are solely to blame for their lot is tough to swallow.”
With respect, it's hard to say that "distressed homeowners, with few exceptions, did this to themselves" when the FBI has reported that 80% of "toxic" loans were initiated by predatory lenders who deliberately misled home-buyers. Take that along with the fact that many, many bankruptcies/foreclosures were caused by medical bills/skyrocketing healthcare costs, and the idea that homeowners are solely to blame for their lot is tough to swallow.”
It's the Unemployment, Stupid
Commented Oct 05, 2009 at 01:16:17 in Politics
“Yet you still tried.
Don't worry. I'm actually in the vaunted tax bracket you fi.ght so hard to defend, but will never actually find yourself in. You can take solace in the fact that you "think" you've talked down to someone who by your own metric is your superior.”
Don't worry. I'm actually in the vaunted tax bracket you fi.ght so hard to defend, but will never actually find yourself in. You can take solace in the fact that you "think" you've talked down to someone who by your own metric is your superior.”
3dtrix replied on Oct 05, 2009 at 01:24:37
“If only that made a lick of sense. Last call...”
It's the Unemployment, Stupid
Commented Oct 05, 2009 at 00:42:58 in Politics
“Nothing important. Maybe you should keep up.”
It's the Unemployment, Stupid
Commented Oct 05, 2009 at 00:42:35 in Politics
“Oh really? So you're saying that there are no qualified IT professionals for a myriad of jobs in the Bay area, Seattle, San Diego, etc. right now? Really? That's what you're goin to claim?
Because IT unemployment in Seattle is 15% right now, and it's home to the 6th best computer science program in the country in UW. IT unemployment in Frisco right now is pushing 20%, and it's home to the no. 3 program in Stanford. Meanwhile, the H1(b)'s that have "Master's Degrees" come from countries that hand them out like candy after only 2 years. Wanna try again, skippy?”
Because IT unemployment in Seattle is 15% right now, and it's home to the 6th best computer science program in the country in UW. IT unemployment in Frisco right now is pushing 20%, and it's home to the no. 3 program in Stanford. Meanwhile, the H1(b)'s that have "Master's Degrees" come from countries that hand them out like candy after only 2 years. Wanna try again, skippy?”
3dtrix replied on Oct 05, 2009 at 01:09:47
“First response scrubbed - too true, most likely. Anybody who thinks they can engage me using "skippy" isn't worth a second go-'round...”
3dtrix replied on Oct 05, 2009 at 00:46:39
“"Frisco" and "skippy" in the same response - and you think that'll stroke me into wasting my time with you? Your wife is a lucky gal, I'm sure...”
It's the Unemployment, Stupid
Commented Oct 05, 2009 at 00:15:24 in Politics
“The reality is there will never be effective change on the economic front.
Throwing money at the problem isn't a solution--it's a means to abu.se the system.
The only real change that can be made to create jobs is to:
1) Get rid of the H1(b) program. This is the biggest thing. These are high paying, white collar jobs that are being exported at this point. And corporations are abusing it with impunity because they can.
2) Stop giving companies incentives to ship manufacturing jobs overseas. Get rid of the loopholes that most of them use to create off-shore tax havens. Start FINING them (heavily) for sending jobs overseas that can be done in-house.
But neither of these thing will ever happen, because we have the best politicians that money can buy--and as we all know, money does just that.”
Throwing money at the problem isn't a solution--it's a means to abu.se the system.
The only real change that can be made to create jobs is to:
1) Get rid of the H1(b) program. This is the biggest thing. These are high paying, white collar jobs that are being exported at this point. And corporations are abusing it with impunity because they can.
2) Stop giving companies incentives to ship manufacturing jobs overseas. Get rid of the loopholes that most of them use to create off-shore tax havens. Start FINING them (heavily) for sending jobs overseas that can be done in-house.
But neither of these thing will ever happen, because we have the best politicians that money can buy--and as we all know, money does just that.”
ThoughtShaman replied on Oct 05, 2009 at 01:42:49
“The H1-B problem has affected me as well - driving wages down significantly. It is to the point that hiring managers do not want to hear what I can do for them. They are simply checking things off a list.”
3dtrix replied on Oct 05, 2009 at 00:37:24
“Absolute nonsense - if there were qualified American candidates for the jobs AMERICAN companies need - H1b would be a non-issue. The reality is that the dearth of qualified applicants to fill WHAT'S LEFT of these jobs in the US underscores that our competitive position in the global economy is in free-fall. Why? Because willful ignorance and defiant know-nothingism are given equal standing to hard science, facts, and real educational discipline and achievement in this country - another contribution of the Republican fungus attacking our nation and rotting it out from the inside...”
cheforacle replied on Oct 05, 2009 at 00:29:56
“Certain loopholes for offshore tax havens have been eliminated. Keep up with what is going on.”
The Google Brain Drain Goes On
Commented Sep 13, 2009 at 00:56:39 in Business
“I turned in my Google badge because it was time to retire. At the ripe old age of 31.”
Huffington Post Blogger Shannyn Moore in Palin's Cross Hairs (UPDATED - Press Conference in Anchorage)
Commented Jul 05, 2009 at 14:56:41 in Politics
“I don't see the connection, personally.”
World Refugee Day: After Fleeing Persecution At Home, Asylum Seekers Face Prison-Like Conditions In U.S.
Commented Jun 20, 2009 at 18:25:30 in World
“With all that's going on, this doesn't rank anywhere near the top of the list of things that should be prioritized.”
lynettema replied on Jun 21, 2009 at 13:10:50
“It is mind boggling all that is needing correction. Demands to President Obama from everywhere and right now because we have waiting for so long for some common sense laws in this country. Call your Senators and Congressmen and women. We are the ones that must hold their feet to the fire. They aren't going to be perfect and we aren't going to get everything we want. BUT if we don't do our part, we can't blame continue to blame the media and individuals in government.”
World Refugee Day: After Fleeing Persecution At Home, Asylum Seekers Face Prison-Like Conditions In U.S.
Commented Jun 20, 2009 at 18:24:10 in World
“Maybe they shouldn't think they have some sort of right to "sanctuary" by coming here.”
akena replied on Jun 21, 2009 at 05:55:59
“Dear SwingingfronCenter,
What happened? Did the rope break and you landed on a spike, impaled up Uranus?”
What happened? Did the rope break and you landed on a spike, impaled up Uranus?”
Ohioan730 replied on Jun 20, 2009 at 23:31:39
“"Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"
"right to sanctuary" There's no way you can be an American talking like that. Who sent you?”
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"
"right to sanctuary" There's no way you can be an American talking like that. Who sent you?”
SpaghettyIrish replied on Jun 20, 2009 at 18:43:00
“Maybe you should learn about the guarantees given to all people of the world by this country. Til then, quietly stay at the kids' table.”
Why Google Bothered to Appeal a $761 Small Claims Case (and Won)
Commented Jun 10, 2009 at 09:41:57 in Business
“I would imagine it was because the case was filed in the wrong jurisdiction. In California, lawyers can't appear in small claims. However, corporations must be represented by lawyers in court actions. Google was in a catch 22. They probably wouldn't have cared if this guy hadn't gone and tried to create an uprising.”
paganmist replied on Jun 10, 2009 at 11:25:51
“The guy didn't try to create an uprising. He blogged about the incident. Do you have a blog? Bloggers blog about anything interesting in their lives, good or bad.
It just so happened that an uprising occurred on its own, due to people in general being upset about customer service, and some other people perhaps looking for something negative about Google and hitting the jackpot with this guy's story.
Don't just randomly smear the guy. He has a right to talk about what happened to him, and if you read what he wrote, you'll see that he never tried to spear-head a campaign against Google.”
It just so happened that an uprising occurred on its own, due to people in general being upset about customer service, and some other people perhaps looking for something negative about Google and hitting the jackpot with this guy's story.
Don't just randomly smear the guy. He has a right to talk about what happened to him, and if you read what he wrote, you'll see that he never tried to spear-head a campaign against Google.”


