TMIDGE66's Comments (17)
View Comments:
Sort:
Condi Rice Pulls A Nixon: When the President Does It, That Means It is Not Illegal
Commented May 01, 2009 at 08:05:02 in Politics
“AND THEY ATTEMPTED TO FOLLOW NIXON'S LEAD. HE BROKE THE LAW, THEY BROKE THE LAW, THIS IS A NATION OF LAWS. HE WAS NOT IMPEACHED BECAUSE WIMPY FORD DIDNT HAVE THE GUTS TO GO THROUGH WITH PUNISHING A FELLOW REPUBLICAN. TELL ME THAT IF IT WERE REVERSED THAT THE REPUBLICANS WOULDNT BE CALLING FOR BLOOD. AS A MATTER OF FACT, CALL TO MIND, CLINTON/LEWINSKY. AND THEY DESTROYED A YOUNG WOMAN'S LIFE. THE ONLY REASON BEING, HATRED.”
Condi Rice Pulls A Nixon: When the President Does It, That Means It is Not Illegal
Commented May 01, 2009 at 08:00:38 in Politics
“TELLTHAT TO THE PRISONERS IN GTMO., ABU GHRAIB, AND ALL THE BLACK HOLES ALL OVER EUROPE. TELL IT TO THE AMERICANS WHO WERE PLUCKED OFF AMERICAN STREETS, NAZI STYLE, NO HABEOUS CORPUS, NO LAWYERS, NO FAMILY NOTIFICATION, THEYJUST DISAPPEARED. THESE WITNESSES ARE THEIR OWN INDICTMENT.”
Palin's Dirty Dozen -- New Ethics Complaint Filed
Commented Apr 25, 2009 at 08:11:39 in Politics
“finally, we are seeing Palin as the bag of wind, signifying nothing but wind, that she has been all along. she sand bagged McCain for her own political gain? wow, even dick cheney didnt have the cohones to do that!!!! how do you take care of your family, especially a special needs child, who really needs mothers love, and traipse all across the country at Alaskan taxpayers expense, and still think you are ethical?
i really think she should run with the delusional Bachman who doesnt even know how to measure dioxide levels.
we all know why the party of No will remain that way until they are voted out of office. they have come up against an ethical president who made the terrible mistake of being black. the rednecks cant accept direction for a black man. Americans on the other hand, see a President.”
i really think she should run with the delusional Bachman who doesnt even know how to measure dioxide levels.
we all know why the party of No will remain that way until they are voted out of office. they have come up against an ethical president who made the terrible mistake of being black. the rednecks cant accept direction for a black man. Americans on the other hand, see a President.”
Tavi replied on Apr 25, 2009 at 12:13:49
“Palin/Bachman 2012 !!!! Love it!!”
grimp replied on Apr 25, 2009 at 11:26:37
“Hey, I agree, she is a bag of wind, but of the worst kind!”
Iraq: Six Long Years Of Deception
Commented Mar 21, 2009 at 07:55:54 in Politics
“how about the loud resounding voices of the American people John. justice must be served or we can no longer call ourselves Americans while the likes of bush,chene y,rumsfeld , wolfowitz, gonzalez, libby, et al, walk free while we mourn our dead.”
McDonald's McScrews Hero Out of Money [UPDATED]
Commented Feb 25, 2009 at 15:24:06 in Politics
“I HAVE NEVER WILLINGLY EATEN AT MC DONALDS NOR WILL I EVER. THEIR ADS ABOUT THE SIZE OF THEIR BURGERS ARE FALSE. I HAVE NEVER SEEN ANYONE GET A BURGER, A WHOPPER, ETC. THAT COMPLIED WITH THE ADVERTISED PRODUCT. THEY REALLY DO STINK. EVERYONE SHOULD BOYCOTT THAT STORE AND THEN BOYCOTT THE INSURANCE COMPANY THAT DENIED HIM MEDICAL BENEFITS. WHAT A BUNCH OF LOSERS.”
Obama's State of the Union Address: An Epitaph for the GOP
Commented Feb 25, 2009 at 15:09:46 in Politics
“KIABELLO4, I HOPE THE GOP REMAINS DORMANT FOR A CENTURY. IT WILL TAKE THAT LONG TO GET RID OF THE STENCH.”
Arianna Discusses Bush's Farewell Address On "Rachel Maddow"
Commented Jan 16, 2009 at 14:35:39 in Politics
“HE IS BOTH BESIDES BEING DELUSIONAL. HE RAN AWAY FROM EVERYTHING ALL HIS LIFE,, STICKING OTHERS TO CLEANUP THE MESSES. THE FACT THAT HE ALLOWED CHENEY TO LEAD HIM AROUND BY THE NOSE IS A CLEAR INDICATION HE WAS NOT QUALIFIED TO RUN EVEN A DOG POUND. A LOT OF AMERICANS ARE WAITING TO SEE THEM BOTH PROSECUTED. IGNORANCE OF THE LAW IS NO EXCUSE FOR WHAT THEY HAVE DONE. WHAT'S GOD SAYING TO HIM NOW?”
aweissnet replied on Jan 16, 2009 at 18:17:11
“"Mission accomplish ed."”
The Nobility of Work
Commented Jan 16, 2009 at 14:22:09 in Living
“DO YOU LIVE IN A VACUUM? DO YOU KNOW WHAT JAMIE HAS DONE FOR CHILDREN, OR ANYONE ELSED FOR THAT MATTER? THOSE CHILDRENS BOOKS SHE WRITES ARE FOR THE BENEFIT OF CHILDREN, THE PROCEEDS ARE DISTRIBUTED ACCORDINGY.
WE HAD 8 YEARS OF PRESUMPTION, NOW WE DO NOT PRESUME.”
WE HAD 8 YEARS OF PRESUMPTION, NOW WE DO NOT PRESUME.”
Frost/Nixon: A Dishonorable Distortion of History
Commented Dec 16, 2008 at 10:32:40 in Entertainment
“what we all fail to realize is that Nixon broke the law and got away with it because republicans never punish their own Ford did nt have the cojones to do the right thing. we only impeach if the president has a girl friend, now there is a terrible crime!!!!!!!! which one betrayed our constitution?”
Peter007 replied on Dec 16, 2008 at 12:18:20
“Neither.
Clinton, Nixon, Martha Stewart, Libby, and Impeached Arizona Governor Mechan were all accused of crimes against the state. These are political crimes without victims.
During the investigation of a crime, prosecutors rely on testimony to make their case. If they don't feel that the witness is cooperating, than a new crime has been committed. This is done because prosecutors usually don't have enough evidence to make the initial case stick. Now they go after the witnesses on a technicality.
Most prosecutor are dishonest. They have to be to trick witnesses. Lying to them or not cooperating with them should be a misdemeanor. Let them do their job without forcing us to give up our 5th amendment rights.”
Clinton, Nixon, Martha Stewart, Libby, and Impeached Arizona Governor Mechan were all accused of crimes against the state. These are political crimes without victims.
During the investigation of a crime, prosecutors rely on testimony to make their case. If they don't feel that the witness is cooperating, than a new crime has been committed. This is done because prosecutors usually don't have enough evidence to make the initial case stick. Now they go after the witnesses on a technicality.
Most prosecutor are dishonest. They have to be to trick witnesses. Lying to them or not cooperating with them should be a misdemeanor. Let them do their job without forcing us to give up our 5th amendment rights.”
Obama Unfairly Tainted by Crimes He Didn't Commit
Commented Dec 11, 2008 at 13:19:08 in Politics
“YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING. QUIT WHILE YOU ARE AHEAD. IF YU HAVE A HEAD.”
Obama Unfairly Tainted by Crimes He Didn't Commit
Commented Dec 11, 2008 at 13:16:47 in Politics
“ABSOLUTELY TRUE, BUT MAYBE HE STUCK A PIN IN MRS. O'LEARY'S COW!!!LOL
THE RING LEADERS, BELIEVE IT OR NOT ARE JOE SCARBOROUGH BY USING INUENDO, CHRIS MATHEWS BECAUSE HE IS THROWING HIS HAT IN THE RING; AND PAT BUCHANAN, NOT UNEXPECTED FROM HIM.
DID GOVERNOR OF NY TALK TO HILLARY ABOUT HER CHOICES? DO ANY GOVERNORS TALK TO THE OUTGOING SENATOR FOR SUGGESTIONS?
WHY IS OBAMA BEING SINGLED OUT?
SCARBOROUGH IS VERY CUTE BUT HE IS TURNING HIS SHOW INTO A FOX JUNIOR SHOW AND SHOUTING MIKA DOWN WHEN SHE TRIES TO SPEAK UP. SHE ISNT GOING TO TAKE IT FOR MUCH LONGER. THE SHOW IS BETTER WITHOUT HIM. SHE AND WILLY DO A PROFESSIONAL JOB WITHOUT JOE'S PET PEEVES. HE IS NO SAINT.”
THE RING LEADERS, BELIEVE IT OR NOT ARE JOE SCARBOROUGH BY USING INUENDO, CHRIS MATHEWS BECAUSE HE IS THROWING HIS HAT IN THE RING; AND PAT BUCHANAN, NOT UNEXPECTED FROM HIM.
DID GOVERNOR OF NY TALK TO HILLARY ABOUT HER CHOICES? DO ANY GOVERNORS TALK TO THE OUTGOING SENATOR FOR SUGGESTIONS?
WHY IS OBAMA BEING SINGLED OUT?
SCARBOROUGH IS VERY CUTE BUT HE IS TURNING HIS SHOW INTO A FOX JUNIOR SHOW AND SHOUTING MIKA DOWN WHEN SHE TRIES TO SPEAK UP. SHE ISNT GOING TO TAKE IT FOR MUCH LONGER. THE SHOW IS BETTER WITHOUT HIM. SHE AND WILLY DO A PROFESSIONAL JOB WITHOUT JOE'S PET PEEVES. HE IS NO SAINT.”
Does Obama Really Plan To Govern from the Center-Right?
Commented Nov 24, 2008 at 14:33:24 in Politics
“IT WASNT THE BLACK VOTE THAT VOTED AGAINST GAY MARRIAGE, IT WAS THE MORMON CHURCH, A WEALTHY CHURCH, ABLE TO SPREAD THE MONEY AROUND TO SPOUT THEIR FOUL OPINIONS AS IF THEY THINK THEY ARE IN CHARGE. REPUDIATION FOR BUSH IS A MISNOMER. HE TOOK AWAY OUR CIVIL RIGHTS. WE WILL TAKE THEM BACK.”
Does Obama Really Plan To Govern from the Center-Right?
Commented Nov 24, 2008 at 14:27:49 in Politics
“I DONT CARE IF OBAMA GOVERNS FROM THE RIGHT, LEFT OR CENTER. I CARE THAT HE GOVERNS FROM THE WHITE HOUSE WITH HONOR AND DISTINCTION, SOMETHING THAT HAS BEEN LACKING FOR MANY YEARS. WHY IS IT SO IMORTANT TO SLOT PEOPLE LEFT, RIGHT, CENTER AND IF THEY DONT FIT, ALL OF A SUDDEN THEY ARE SOCIALISTS OR MARXIST. THAT IS THE REAL REASON WE TOOK DOWN THE BUSH REGIME. LET THE MAN DO HIS JOB.”
Is Elisabeth Hasselbeck Too Dumb to Be on The View?
Commented Oct 25, 2008 at 16:20:33 in Media
“actually, taking a page from Dilbert and this could apply to palin or hasselback, "your plan is a hodgepodge of unwarranted optimism encased in an impenetrable fortress of buzz words" and if anyone could read it, well, "there's that unwarranted optimism again."”
The Delicate Subject of John McCain's Marbles
Commented Sep 18, 2008 at 13:24:35 in Politics
“ISNT $50 A BIT STEEP JBS? I MEAN, THE STOCK MARKET IS NO LONGER; MC CAINS FAIRY TALE ABOUT SARA PALIN IS EXACTLY THAT. THE ONLY THING SHE HAS GOING FOR HER ARE HER GLASSES, "FROM JAPAN". WOW. AND SHE STILL CANT SEE THE FOREST FOR THE TREES. BUT SHE CAN SEE RUSSIA. LET MC CAIN GO ON TV AND JUST SAYS "GLORP, GLORP, GLORP, SOMEONE WILL UNDERSTAND. SOUNDS LIKE SOMEONE DROWNING, EH WHAT? WHAT A MESS. I CANT BELIEVE HE IS STILL USING HIS POW EXPERIENCE AS A WAY TO WIN THE WHITE HOUSE. SORRY, IT IS NO LONGER FOR SALE. THERE ARE A LOT OF VETS OUT THERE WHO WERE TORTURED AND THEY DONT USE IT TO GET AHEAD. SAD, SAD, SAD.”
Hillary's Ignominious Finale
Commented Feb 27, 2008 at 15:45:50 in Home
“no dalicious, you lost. you lost a smart, intelligent woman who knows more than barak will ever know. so you lost, and now all of america will lose. there is no such sentence as she gone. enough said.”
Clinton Polls Her Email List
Commented Dec 13, 2007 at 07:39:18 in Home
“it is interesting that all the years oprah has been on tv and "in power" she has never endorsed a political candidate, choosing to remain above the fray as practiced by a major portion of tv hosts.
suddenly she is in there pushing barack. so does that mean that there has never been a white candidate worthy of her praise and now she has appointed barack as our savior?
in ten years he should run again. right now he is wet behind the ears, no foreign policy; no sure plan for health, just noble speeches inspired by the tsar of tv.
will be interesting to see if she is still hot for politics if barack is not nominated.”
suddenly she is in there pushing barack. so does that mean that there has never been a white candidate worthy of her praise and now she has appointed barack as our savior?
in ten years he should run again. right now he is wet behind the ears, no foreign policy; no sure plan for health, just noble speeches inspired by the tsar of tv.
will be interesting to see if she is still hot for politics if barack is not nominated.”
beemer505 replied on Dec 13, 2007 at 16:41:09
“i agree.. i said the same thing to a friend of mine... where was the big O when the idiot was running again in '04?? you would think she would have used her popularity to convince people that they should vote democratic to avoid another bush term!!! why obama??? why now??? i wonder- lol”
MAGLATINA replied on Dec 13, 2007 at 11:41:39
“I COULDN'T AGREE MORE. I ADMIRE PUBLIC FIGURES LIKE CLOONEY THAT ALL ALONG HAVE STOOD UP FOR "PRINCIPLRS", NOT PERSONS. I THINK THAT OPHRA HAS MADE A MISTAKE... ANY WAY, I NEVER WATCH HER... HOW MANY PEOPLE DO NOT? AND WHY, AS YOU SAY, IS SHE SUPPORTING A CANDIDATE KNOW WHILE SHE WAS MUTE BEFORE? GIVE ME ABRAK!!!”
Bozwellian replied on Dec 13, 2007 at 10:28:07
“Actually, Oprah has given stage presence to politicals ...and DO remember Bush waling on , embracing her in 2000 and THAT DID GIVE SUGGESTION, that even as she claimed NO preference, she had no objection either..Sh e had the Ma and Poppy on as well, Laura and too, she had Gore and TIpper(but was NOT as "comfortab le"..)She has had the Clintons too and OH, her good friend Maria, when the husban Arnie was "needing" a boost due to serious fem questioning regarding HIS background with female interactions, Maria got a presence as well as Arnie and that TOO came off as an "endorsement of sorts"..Sh e allowed them to be "comfortably presented", and with such, allowed the audience (far and wide in viewership) to configure that if Oprah had NO STRONG OBJECTION , for surely she would NOT have allowed them the platform/e xposure/et c, then they too could OVERLOOK certain aspects.
FOR SURE, O has never OUTRIGHTLY 'endorsed' any particular candidate but she has "assisted" the public perceptions of candidates.
She never stated straight out being AGAINST the Iraq invasion either, matter of fact, brought quite an array/panel of various sorts on her show to DISCUSS aspects... That too had impact and would have been "nice" if she HAD spoken up and out LOUD then --perhaps if she and others HAD, well then perhaps the TRUE MAJORITY OPINION would have been acknowledged and NOT IGNORRED as it was , not marginalized as being but a few whacko's , not being objected to by other than NON patriots or those that were too whimpy to fightfor the USA honorifica ls/revenge disquised as "avengemen t"...Pleas e stop the attempt to make this a race issue, that she is but supporting another "fellow black"...T hat is insulting to the many "whites" who found inspiration in Obama far earlier than Oprah's declaration of him/endorsement of him.”
FOR SURE, O has never OUTRIGHTLY 'endorsed' any particular candidate but she has "assisted" the public perceptions of candidates.
She never stated straight out being AGAINST the Iraq invasion either, matter of fact, brought quite an array/panel of various sorts on her show to DISCUSS aspects...

