“Es natural que a ti la falta de información te provoque pereza; sin embargo, cualquier persona menos inculta reconoce que la cantante Shakira --además de ser una gran artista (y el arte ya es un aporte a la humanidad) ha conseguido a través de su fundación PIES DESCALZOS establecer una valiosísima red de protección de la infancia en varias ciudades colombianas ayudando a mejorar la calidad de vida de muchísimos niños, estudiantes y sus familias.
La FUNDACIÓN PIES DESCALZOS fundada, dirigida y financiada por Shakira es un potente motor que lucha contra la miseria en Colombia y es reconocida por la UNICEF y la CRUZ ROJA como una institución de beneficencia modelo en la asistencia a niñas y niños maltratados o que viven en condiciones de abandono o pobreza extrema.”
Nosaro on Jan 26, 2013 at 11:35:40
“Tu comentario tendría mas valor si no me insultaras llamándome inculta.
Y efectivamente, si se hicieran fotos de Shakira en su labor filantrópica, estaría de acuerdo contigo. Pero la noticia no va de esto. Como ni dices nada de Pique, entiendo que coincides en que no aporta nada....
“In matters of property claims, what counts are the most recent owners or holders of a land or real estate, not the oldest.
According to the law and common sense, it is not relevant or have the slightest importance who were the owners of a territory in the past. In the real world, claiming a property, say, after a century, it would be absolutely impossible, now, to pretend that someone is entitled to properties that three thousand years ago belonged to a culture that practiced the same religion that people living today in the twenty-first century, is an insult.”
“What right have you to make fun of one of the fundamental precepts of Christianity? The concept of Jesus Christ as a MARTYR is a very serious matter for the billions who practice this faith. Have you no shame?”
“Let me tell you this: genocide is Always --ALWAYS-- a deliberate crime of SELECTIVE and systematic destruction, in which a whole or a part of an ethnic, racial, religious or national group is target for elimination.
From the past to the present, from Africa to China, to Colonial America to Russia, to Australia... World history, unfortunately, is a gruesome archive of genocides, most of which have been much more terrible and extraordinary, and undoubtedly unmatched numerically to what you try to put as the ne plus ultra.”
Sister Lauren on Oct 14, 2012 at 11:52:55
“You may be underestimating the power of uranium munitions to create a life killing cloud, uranium creates a cloud of fine dust and gas made of uranium particles as it burns. That stuff is super toxic. One of uranium's interesting properties is it gives off light when hit with radiation. This has a remarkable effect inside the body at the cellular level.
Meaning if you breath in the dust and then get a chest X-ray, or walk through an airport scanner, the uranium in your body will glow, and crash a whole lot of cell structures in the process. It is especially damaging to the DNA and wreaks havoc on the unborn. That is a cumulative effect and has the potential to kill us all.”
“Please do not come here to show your ignorance. Let alone to try to lecture others on a subject you do not know.
FYI, the Mayans were one of the only ancient civilizations that understood the concept of zero. This allowed them to write very large numbers.
“Look, the idea that the aim of the Nazis was to exterminate all the Jews of the world (100% of the population, as you put it) is not just a nonsensical myth, but an absolute material impossibility.
The global population of Jews was at the time of the War of 15.5 million of which almost half (43%) did not lived in Europe but in other continents.
If Hitler's plan was to kill all the Jews of the world, how is that his extermination policy only addresses the Jews who live in his neighborhood and does not refer to those forty million Jews who live in distant places as the United States, Canada, Argentina, Uruguay, Panama, Brazil, Mexico, the Caribbean, as well as allo those other living in the Middle East, Africa, Morocco, Persia, Turkey, Russia, etc..?”
thekid843 on Oct 2, 2012 at 15:18:03
“I would love to know where you obtained your figures. I am a professor specializing on the Holocaust. First of all the most reliable data to date is that there were approximately 12 MILLION Jews at the time, almost 3/4 living in Eastern Europe. The countries include Russia, Poland, Ukraine, Romania, the former Czechoslovakia.and approximately 1 million in Western Europe. Also why do you call it a "nonsensical myth"? Have you read "Mein Kampf", The Goebbel Diaries", Himmler's speeches to his SS? They all refer to the TOTAL EXTERMINATION of the Jews. In Hitler's delusional, paranoid and twisted mind, the Third Reich would last 1000 years. Plenty of time to accomplish his task. I have not seen any official document or unbiased evidence concerning the total elimination of Poles. As a matter of fact, the Nazis kidnapped thousands of Polish children with "Aryan characteristics and took them back to Germany to be adopted by German parents. How many "Aryan" Jewish children were adopted ? Had Hitler been successful The Nazis and their many willing accomplices in other countries would have seen to it that the Jews would be totally eterminated. My last point. It is not a matter of exact numbers but the fact that for the first time in human history A LEGALLY ELECTED GOVERNMENT HAD AS ITS TOP PRIORITY THE DESTRUCTION OF A POPULATION !!!”
katter47 on Sep 28, 2012 at 20:53:35
“Thalatu, you are picking nits and missing the point. Hitler's "Final Solution" was to exterminate all Jews from Europe and he was remarkably successful in taking the first steps to do so. Obviously extermination from the world would be dependent on Nazi world domination. (Something Hitler's hyperbole did in fact aspire to.) The fact remains the Holocaust was a unique situation combining a clearly stated ethnic extermination policy combined with the military and technological capacity to carry it out, almost.”
Thalatu on Sep 28, 2012 at 05:09:44
“Sorry, on line 8:
It should read "forty percent" and not "forty million"”
“Well, looks like you have your head buried in the sand and your @rse in the clouds!
The truth is many Jews are quite candid about their historical involvement in Bolshevism. On 4 April 1919 the Jewish Chronicle: "There is much in the fact of Bolshevism itself, in the fact that so many Jews are Bolshevists, in the fact that the ideals of Bolshevism at many points are consonant with the finest ideals of Judaism."
As everyone knows, when the Bolsheviks overthrew the short-lived democratic government in Moscow and St. Petersburg in October 1917, it was a virtual Jewish coup d'état. The most prominent Jewish Commissar was Trotsky, real name Bronstein.
Sir Winston Churchill, writing in the Illustrated Sunday Herald of 8 February 1920 wrote:
"With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of leading figures (of the Bolshevick Revolution) are Jews. Moreover the principal inspiration and the driving power comes from Jewish leaders."”
UKVisitor on Sep 26, 2012 at 12:03:03
“I'm not arguing that many Jews weren't Bolsheviks, (given an anti-semitic society who can blame them for wanting to change it?)
I'm arguing that to pretend that 'Jew' and 'Bolshevik are synonyms is false and that there is no such thing as "Jewish Bolshevism" outside the fetid imaginations of Nazis.
So why don't you follow the fine example of your leader and shoot yourself?”
“¿Pero qué disparates estás diciendo JLG?
Lo que Amariri dice en su comentario (al que tú contestas sin ton ni son) es absolutamente cierto: si fueran los iraníes quienes hubieran plantado el virus Flame en los ordenadores israelíes y norteamericanos, ya veríamos al mundo entero pidiendo guerra contra Teherán! ¿No te parece?”
So you think that Palestinians are more interested in the Jews that their land, their state and their rights... uh?
You are acting like a typical sociopath One who believe that people are obsessed with them. They are convinced that everybody want to take away what they have, they want to kill them, etc. If he owes money to someone and that person sues him in court, he will say that person is suing because he hates him, not because he owes money to that person.
Thats exactly what you are stating here, when you say so vehemently that "What Palestinians are resisting are JEWS, and nothing else."
If instead of Jews, had been Gypsies (and assuming they would have done exactly the same), you don't think the Palestinians would have acted the same way?”
Rianna on Jun 6, 2011 at 17:59:25
“Good points. They steal lands, hold them under siege, blockade them so that basic necessities are not allowed in, and Palestinian products are not allowed out, destroy their olive groves, and attack them at the slightest excuse, and they want the Palestinian people to smile and sing Kumbaya. What a load of BS.”
discocapper on Jun 1, 2011 at 17:27:26
“You must be utterly clueless. Do you even deserve a reply, seeing that your baseless reversal of cause and effect, and victim and aggressor, followed by your foolish attack upon me has so little to do with what I've posted? Did you even view my links? No, of course not.
Read Myths and Facts by Mitchell Bard or go to mythsandfactsonline and get back to me.
You can't attack someone with the intention of destroying them and then whine about the outcome. Palestinians aren't reacting, or resisting. Their wound is self-inflicted, a direct result of years of failed Arab efforts to destroy Israel.
If anyone has deceived and abused the Palestinians it is their fellow Arabs who continue to use them as fodder and political pawns. Israelis are perfectly willing to live with Arabs who embrace peace and accept that Israel exists.”
“What you're saying is that the Palestinians are to blame for not having the technology that allows them to calculate their targets precisely.
If that is so, then it is important that the Palestinians get more sophisticated weapons that allow them to attack Israeli military targets only. Be aware that there is a casus belli and they have, legally, the same rights as Israel.
Meanwhile, the world is becoming more aware of what is really happening. One of two things: Either the Israelis have the most stupid and incompetent army in the world, or they are killing Palestinian children at will ...
It is difficult not to conclude that they do it on purpose. After all,Is not that what Rabbi Ovadia Yosef and Rabbi Shapira are preaching around? The latter in his Kings Torah proclaims that it is lawful to kill Arab children, before they become enemies of Israel.”
“Lets see. if Hamas does not have "accurate precision rockets," how is it possible that they can "accurate pinpoint their rockets" to "precisley kill Israeli civilians"?
After all, according to the PR script "Hamas deliberately targets civilians" ...
And here you are: candidly and openly declaring that Hamas has no technological capability whatsoever to deliberately kill a target ...
Ha-Ha-Ha How much longer do you think you can continue to deceive the world with that mixture of arrogance, stupidity, bigotry and lies?”
Ronald Bakman on Nov 22, 2012 at 13:49:15
“You are the one that looks pretty dumb right now. By shooting rockets without aim at a whole country they are in fact not trying to aim at the military... so who do you think they are actually shooting those rockets at? I can see how excited you got about that comment, but you really made yourself look pretty dumb...”
Sure it's called "we are the chosen" and you people are "the Amalekites: the unmerciful". It's all there, in the Book.
Israel the Destroyer coming to a war near you... soon.”
nevitta357 on Nov 8, 2012 at 15:26:14
“I'm not too worried about the imaginary big brother of a nation that was routinely kicked around by most of it's neigbors is going to be causing anybody any problems. I can't say the same about the crazies who still actually believe these fairy tales.”
“Is there a difference between killing "400 children" and killing "400 infants"?
Is it perhaps that (in your eyes) one of these atrocities is less atrocious than the other?
Would you make the difference between an "Israeli child" and an "Israeli infant" killed by a Palestinian? Would they not be both equally heinous?”