ThomasDoubting's Comments (30)
Public Option Stays Very Much Alive
Commented Sep 30, 2009 at 03:29:56 in Politics
“Big Insurance will get what they want. Big Pharma will too. I think that Big Insurance likes it the way it is, a lot of young people, paying every month, or maybe their employer just pays them several dollars less per hour. and takes care of it.,kickbacks and all. A lot of people think that they have insurance until they try to use it. 44 years ago Big Insurance, refused to continue to insure people who had reached the ripe old age of 65, and then retired. Then Medicare was created for those 65 and older. What they would like now, is private health care for those who are young, healthy, and wealthy, and public health care for the rest of us. Why not "Medicare for All" / Accept Nothing Less / Don't get fooled again”
New Rule: Conspiracy Weary
Commented Sep 10, 2009 at 19:53:31 in Comedy
“Part 1 I read the Warren Report, and I read the 911 Commission Report. The 911 Report failed to notice that 3 buildings turned to dust that day. They only commented, on the twin towers. but apparently forgot to mention the third building (WTC7) that turned to dust that day.That was the one that was not hit by a plane but turned to powder just like the other two. That commission created the "Pancake Theory" like the Warren Report created the "Single Bullet Theory". Neither of which is physically possible. After the report was written some of the commissioners complained that the Report contained false information regarding NORAD's scrambling of those jet fighters to protect our country. They said that the Defense Department lied to them, and refused to cooperate. It is now known, that our multi-billion dollar a year, military, did not get even one plane, off the ground during the almost two hours, that the attack lasted. No reason was ever given for the standdown.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_E4N5YIycI&feature=PlayList&p=54CA3953A323524B”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_E4N5YIycI&feature=PlayList&p=54CA3953A323524B”
anaxamander replied on Sep 11, 2009 at 14:32:26
“I used to not believe the "magic bullet theory" until I saw Mythbusters recreate that bullet shot successfully. Turns out they were in a special car made for driving thru crowds and waving, and the Gov was in the front seat which was lower and further inside than a regular seat would be. When this is taken into account, the "magic bullet theory" turns out to be not just plausible but recreatable. It would be difficult to recreate the pancake theory because you'd have to destroy buildings, but building 7 was shorter and was probably hit by debris and shaken by the massive rumbles of those two buildings falling. That is certainly plausible. And I have seen photos of it. It was not, in fact, "turned to dust." The base of it was still standing. Was the Cheney administration sorry 9/11 happened? Doubtful. It gave them just the atmosphere they needed to do the things they did. But I do not believe for a moment they were behind it. It was some disenchanted Saudis with alot of money who didn't like the way their government played ball with us and allowed our troops in their country. Just like you would be if Saudi troops were stationed here. And that's it.”
diabless replied on Sep 11, 2009 at 11:14:42
“Exactly. And what is illogical about asking why the greatest military/superpower of our time could not scramble 1 fighter jet with so many rogue flights awry that morning? 1 plane. Just 1. It's this lack of response that is illogical. Never mind the buildings that mysteriously imploded on account of the proximity of the buildings that were actually hit.....
Sigh. Why aren't throngs of media ppl questioning this? Also illogical.”
Sigh. Why aren't throngs of media ppl questioning this? Also illogical.”
questionator replied on Sep 11, 2009 at 10:24:12
“Listening to some of the speaches that JFK gave in the days leading up to his murder will give you an idea of why he was assassinated. But of coarse, to suggest that there even IS a military-industrial-media complex would only make you a "conspiracy theorist" thereby eliminating any of your credibility as being a sane person. Because these days, if you question authority, why, you can't possibly be capable of rational thought.”
rf-hawaii replied on Sep 11, 2009 at 04:25:47
“Yep. Building 7 was shown being imploded on live television as well as the PBS special about 911.
Why and how was that building imploded on that day?
No answers, just a lot of questions.”
Why and how was that building imploded on that day?
No answers, just a lot of questions.”
Charles Stoveken replied on Sep 10, 2009 at 20:52:09
“IN THE CASE OF THE TOWERS IT IS MORE IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT THE CRUX OF ISSUE IS NOT HOW THEY WERE BROUGHT DOWN , BUT RATHER WHO STOOD THE MOST TO GAIN BY NOT ONLY DELIBERATLY NOT STOPPING THE TERRORISTS BUT DOING EVERYTHING POSSIBLE TO AID THEM ONCE THEIR PLANS WERE DISCOVERED.CHARLIE.”
New Rule: Conspiracy Weary
Commented Sep 10, 2009 at 19:49:10 in Comedy
“Part 2 The Warren Commission had the services of J.Edgar Hoover who was a master of the cover-up. Forty six years later, new information is finally appearing, photos, films, eyewitnesses who survived, and are now willing to speak out, and death bed confessions, not to mention the audio record of many shots fired almost simultaneously, from different directions. If that is not enough to convince you, look at the Zapruder film, that shows the president being shot from the front. For the younger folks reading this, remember that they will not release CIA files, on Lee Harvey Oswald until the year 2039, for national security reasons, of course. So much for the lone nut theory. If this was a random act by a lone nut why are they not able to convince us. The men who killed JFK must still be in positions of power today to have maintained this cover-up for all these years. The 911 cover-up was a very sloppy job. For those who have the courage to look in to this, you will find the truth fairly easily. Of course that does not mean, that you will be able to express that truth, openly. The only people who believe the Warren Report and the 911 Report are the people who have not read them.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_E4N5YIycI&feature=PlayList&p=54CA3953A323524B”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_E4N5YIycI&feature=PlayList&p=54CA3953A323524B”
New Rule: Conspiracy Weary
Commented Sep 10, 2009 at 02:38:15 in Comedy
“It appears that Bill Maher has backed himself into a corner, when it comes to what happened on 9/11. These truthers are pretty clever, they have caused him to deny any knowledge of what happened that day, other than what the Bush/Cheney regime told us through their media outlets. It was a lot easier to bullshit people, immediately after the attacks. There was a lot of fear, sometimes expressed as rage. George W. Bush 's approval rating went from 51% to 91% within days. Was it because of the immediate and effective response that stopped the attack when the first plane was reported hijacked? It must have been in spite of the military Stand Down, that allowed the attacks to go on until it was finished. Or was it because he handled a Megaphone well. To those 20% or so who still support Bush and his policies, you probably believe he never lied to you. To the 80% or so whose minds are open to the possibility that maybe, they didn't tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, all the time. If you are one of those who does not know what happened that day, The link may provoke some questions and some answers. Discuss it with your friends, neighbors, and co-workers. They might surprise you.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_E4N5YIycI&feature=PlayList&p=54CA3953A323524B”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_E4N5YIycI&feature=PlayList&p=54CA3953A323524B”
Rainmakr44 replied on Sep 10, 2009 at 20:37:33
“Dear Thomas. Have you ever seen the fake moon landing video. It's every bit as convincing. They had their expert college educated supporters,too. The Kennedy asassination? Omigod, videos ,expert witnesses, gun specialists. They covered every minor flaw that couldn't be explained...until Gerald Posner wrote "Case Closed" that was written with such unbiased writing, but dealt with "every" question" raised, including the magical bullet. If you were a logical, intelligent human being, his book ended any and all conspiracy. Still...some would not change even though they could not dispute his findings.”
ipv4 replied on Sep 10, 2009 at 09:46:15
“If their something we have learned about the bush adminstration is that they are way to incompetent to pull of an operation of this scale. Cmon , give me a break.”
just2curious replied on Sep 10, 2009 at 08:50:06
“Did you know Huffingtonpost has a ban on 911 articles being blogged? I just read that in one of Arianna's recent articles.”
President Obama Will Likely Dump the Public Option, and Here's Why
Commented Aug 19, 2009 at 17:43:24 in Politics
“It appears that we are not going to get a Free, Universal, Single Payer, Not For Profit, Health Care System, in the near future. The polls say that more than 70% of the American people want a Single Payer System. The Congress, those who admit to being Republicans, and those who say that they are Democrats, together have sold us out to the Insurance, and Pharmecutical industries. Many people feel that anything this government gives us, will be better than what we have now. That does not necessarily follow. In fact with this crowd, that is presently in power, it's hard to believe that they will not make it worse. I know, it is hard to believe. Maybe we should vote it down, until they give us what we want. Isn't that how it is supposed to work, in a democracy ? "Medicare For All"”
Is Obama a Back-Room Blue Dog on Health Care?
Commented Aug 15, 2009 at 02:00:08 in Politics
“It appears that we are not going to get a Free, Universal, Single Payer, Not For Profit, Health Care System, in the near future. The polls say that more than 70% of the American people want a Single Payer System. The Congress, those who admit to being Republicans, and those who say that they are Democrats, together have sold us out to the Insurance, and Pharmecutical industries. Many people feel that anything this government gives us, will be better than what we have now. That does not necessarily follow. In fact with this crowd, that is presently in power, it's hard to believe that they will not make it worse. I know, it is hard to believe. Maybe we should vote it down, until they give us what we want. Isn't that how it is supposed to work, in a democracy ? "Medicare For All"”
Keep Your Goddamn Government Hands Off My Medicare!
Commented Aug 05, 2009 at 22:38:56 in Politics
“Corporate America claims that they are paying from 5 to 10 dollars, per hour, per employee to the health insurance companies. Everyone gets a 5 to 10 dollar, per hour, raise, with a Free, Universal, Single Payer, not For Profit, Health Care System. Talk about a stimulus package! If those in corporate jobs, with private insurance have illnesses, that have been identified, they are stuck, working for that employer, until the employer dumps them. Even if it's a family member, who has a preexisting condition, that employee can forget about a different insurance company, or a different job. I have been told, that it is hard to negotiate a raise, or a promotion, when they know, that you can't leave. Why are we not demanding, to be paid in cash? Maybe they are paying 5 to 10 dollars, per hour, per employee. If they are, then why are they opposed to "Medicare for All" ? ?”
pragmaticdallasite replied on Aug 06, 2009 at 00:15:55
“That number sounds about right. You get it. A lot of people don't understand it that way unfortunately”
Five Reasons the Health Care Battle Is NOT the Presidential Campaign
Commented Aug 05, 2009 at 00:28:40 in Politics
“Does this plan call for the private insurance companies to continue to insure healthy young families as long as they are healthy, and young and put the less desirable, higher risk, people into some kind of pool of people, that the private companies don't want to insure. Something like Medicaid, but for people who used to consider themselves middle class. We need a Free, Universal, Single Payer, Not For Profit, Health Care system. If everybody is in, and nobody is out, it will work better for everyone. Why would anyone other than some of the filthy rich, and members of corporate America want a two tier system? Don't they know that they will be in the bottom tier as soon as they miss a couple of paychecks. These people don't seem to understand that their employer is paying some of their salary to one of these insurance giants, and maybe, getting kickbacks. I would prefer the cash! "Medicare For All"”
How To Argue For A Public Option On Health Insurance
Commented Aug 04, 2009 at 23:19:00 in Politics
“The reason why a Free, Universal, Single Payer,Not For Profit, Health care System works so well is because we throw all the money in one big pot, then if some people become ill, they will be cared for and for those who are fortunate enough to be well, they can enjoy their good health throughout their lives. They can also sleep better at night knowing that, if they become ill, it will not bring financial disaster too. Among the people who are fortunate enough to have employer health insurance, many of them are young healthy adults with no obvious health issues, otherwise they would probably not have been hired in the first place. When the employer pays, they are careful about who they hire. This contributes to discrimination, by age, weight, sex, etc. Whatever the employer saves, goes into the companies profits. What the employee sometimes forgets, is that the money paid for health insurance is part of their salary. In other words, if the employer no longer pays for insurance, does everyone get a raise, sounds fair to me. You know that any increase in the cost of insurance represents a pay cut or a missed raise for you, so why not a raise when it goes down. With private insurance, you don't know if you and your family are insured until you see that hospital bill marked "Paid in Full", and then you have to worry about next time. ,,,"Medicare For All"”
How To Argue For A Public Option On Health Insurance
Commented Aug 03, 2009 at 23:03:11 in Politics
“Part 1 The Health Care Industry as represented by the Insurance Companies have a plan for how they want this issue resolved. The Democratic Congress and President also have a plan, and although, we have heard bits and pieces of the government plan, most people have no idea what they are proposing. The fact that the proposed bill has more than 1000 pages is a bad sign. If the sponsors thought that the American voters would approve, they would be telling us all about it, with pride. Why are these "progressive" Senators, and Congressmen telling us about the need to go slow, and getting it past the right wingers. The first class, in Negotiation 101, teaches that you ask for more than you want, not less, and do it, with the confidence that you will win. They should be telling us, that we now have a Democratic President and a Democratic Congress and we are going to use this opportunity to something that the American people want. Not only give the people what they want, but do it cheaper. Recent polls show 70% of the Americans polled, said they want a Free, Universal, Single payer, not for profit, health care system. We don't need no stinkin, Insurance Companies, and people know it.”
Samcat604 replied on Aug 04, 2009 at 10:14:13
“"Recent polls show 70% of the Americans polled, said they want a Free, Universal, Single payer, not for profit, health care system."
Of course people want something for nothing. However, no such system exists. NOTHING is ever free. If you have a job, you are paying for it twice. Once in taxes (the 'penalty' costs of your employer not provided their own) and once for the plan itself.”
Of course people want something for nothing. However, no such system exists. NOTHING is ever free. If you have a job, you are paying for it twice. Once in taxes (the 'penalty' costs of your employer not provided their own) and once for the plan itself.”
How To Argue For A Public Option On Health Insurance
Commented Aug 03, 2009 at 23:01:53 in Politics
“Part 2 In the 1950s and 1960s, when medical technology began to keep people alive, longer than the Insurance Industry had planned, they refused to insure those over age 65, which was a common retirement age, at that time. If you left your job, that was the end of your health care insurance. That's why the government created Medicare. Medicare has covered seniors who are relatively high risk, while they left younger healthier people to the private companies. Now it looks like they want the federal government to insure the millions considered 'uninsurable'. Of course they don't want to lose their healthy young people, many of whom never even see a doctor, while their employer, pays a large percentage, of the employees' salary, to this insurance company. Only when the hospital says 'Paid In Full' will they be sure if they were really covered. I suspect that most of those 1000 pages tell us, what we are not going to get. When the right wingers have some input, of course they will make it even worse. "Medicare for All"”
The Impossible Dream: Can We Get Better Health Care for Less?
Commented Aug 02, 2009 at 02:45:48 in Politics
“Part 1 The Health Care Industry as represented by the Insurance Companies have a plan for how they want this issue resolved. The Democratic Congress and President also have a plan, and although, we have heard bits and pieces of the government plan, most people have no idea what they are proposing. The fact that the proposed bill has more than 1000 pages is a bad sign. If the sponsors thought that the American voters would approve, they would be telling us all about it, with pride. Why are these "progressive" Senators, and Congressmen telling us about the need to go slow, and getting it past the right wingers. The first class, in Negotiation 101, teaches that you ask for more than you want, not less, and do it, with the confidence that you will win. They should be telling us, that we now have a Democratic President and a Democratic Congress and we are going to use this opportunity to something that the American people want. Not only give the people what they want, but do it cheaper. Recent polls show 70% of the Americans polled, said they want a Free, Universal, Single payer, not for profit, health care system. We don't need no stinkin, Insurance Companies, and people know it.”
The Impossible Dream: Can We Get Better Health Care for Less?
Commented Aug 02, 2009 at 02:44:16 in Politics
“Part 2 In the 1950s and 1960s, when medical technology began to keep people alive, longer than the Insurance Industry had planned, they refused to insure those over age 65, which was a common retirement age, at that time. If you left your job, that was the end of your health care insurance. That's why the government created Medicare. Medicare has covered seniors who are relatively high risk, while they left younger healthier people to the private companies. Now it looks like they want the federal government to insure the millions considered 'uninsurable'. Of course they don't want to lose their healthy young people, many of whom never even see a doctor, while their employer, pays a large percentage, of the employees' salary, to this insurance company. Only when the hospital says 'Paid In Full' will they be sure if they were really covered. I suspect that most of those 1000 pages tell us, what we are not going to get. When the right wingers have some input, of course they will make it even worse. "Medicare for All"”
My Trip to Guantanamo: It Must Be Closed
Commented Jun 25, 2009 at 23:46:09 in World
“This is a precedent! Now that it has been established, that we will allow our government, to hold non-citizens indefinitely without even filing charges, how long will it be, before they openly hold American citizens, indefinitely, without filing charges? Didn't we just replace the President? What happened to the change that we voted for? We already have millions of our people, in prison. Some have committed serious crimes but many arrestees, are only charged with possession, of a certain illegal substance. Nearly a million people a year are arrested on marijuana charges. It is unknown how many were actually in possession of the pot, before their encounter with the police. Is the torture still going on? Is the waterboarding more successful under Obama? Are the confessions coming? That's just for non-citizens? Right?”
George Bush in Retirement: "I Never Listened To Anyone But Me"
Commented Feb 25, 2009 at 22:33:27 in Politics
“It's nice to have a president, that can put a whole sentence together.”
Gdebs replied on Feb 26, 2009 at 03:31:45
“I have heard (The Guardian?) that Bush is drinking himself to death in Crawford.”
An Opportunity For President Obama: Change America's Status Quo on Drug Policy
Commented Feb 16, 2009 at 00:37:23 in Politics
“This is one of those situations where the people who know the least about the subject, (those who have never inhaled) are considered to be the experts.”
CyrusBeaucephus replied on Feb 16, 2009 at 10:33:46
“ain't that the truth! its all very medieval, like worrying about witches casting spells
We just can't stop burning witches! What shall become of the children?”
We just can't stop burning witches! What shall become of the children?”
Playinjured replied on Feb 16, 2009 at 03:43:30
“No, they inhaled. They're just uppity now.”
The Obama Health Reforms Begin
Commented Feb 14, 2009 at 17:06:10 in Politics
“The American people can no longer afford to pay for their own health care. Costs have skyrocketed, while salaries have declined. This capitalist system requires workers to have a corporate sponsor, if they are to have health care insurance. Even people who do not care about their fellow man, are forced to acknowledge that the cost must be shared, for everyone to be covered. Those who are still opposed to covering everyone, even people who do not have a corporate sponsor, refuse to see that it will cost each of us about 30% less.”
JUSTME replied on Feb 16, 2009 at 11:18:41
“Ah, but those who are generally opposed to covering everyone, are those who already have coverage for themselves and their families. It's all a matter of perspective.
I could afford my own healthcare if the Pentagon gave me back my share for Bush's Wars and what he spent lining his friends' pockets. I could afford my own healthcare if I got back my share of providing tax breaks for the wealthy. Where do I send the invoice???”
I could afford my own healthcare if the Pentagon gave me back my share for Bush's Wars and what he spent lining his friends' pockets. I could afford my own healthcare if I got back my share of providing tax breaks for the wealthy. Where do I send the invoice???”
Executing the Innocent?
Commented Sep 18, 2008 at 22:55:20 in Politics
“Part 2
With about 16,000 murders in America, there are only 65 executions in a given year. There are many reasons why only 65 are chosen for official Government Executions, First among those reasons, is the fact that only a small percentage of the 16,000 murders leads to an arrest. Even when arrests are made many of the suspects establish their innocence at that time. Of those convicted many, with decent legal defense, win on appeal. Of those who remain, although many are condemned, only about 65 people are killed. We can speculate on the 65! Are they rich or poor? White or black ? Male or female ? Yuppies or high school drop-outs ? Average intelligence or less than normal ? Non-drinkers or alcoholics ? Private attorney or public defender ? Rx drug user or street drug user ? Self-supporting or unemployed ? Total 16,000 + 65 = 16,065 . . How does it benefit you, if we kill these people ? . What's really going on?”
With about 16,000 murders in America, there are only 65 executions in a given year. There are many reasons why only 65 are chosen for official Government Executions, First among those reasons, is the fact that only a small percentage of the 16,000 murders leads to an arrest. Even when arrests are made many of the suspects establish their innocence at that time. Of those convicted many, with decent legal defense, win on appeal. Of those who remain, although many are condemned, only about 65 people are killed. We can speculate on the 65! Are they rich or poor? White or black ? Male or female ? Yuppies or high school drop-outs ? Average intelligence or less than normal ? Non-drinkers or alcoholics ? Private attorney or public defender ? Rx drug user or street drug user ? Self-supporting or unemployed ? Total 16,000 + 65 = 16,065 . . How does it benefit you, if we kill these people ? . What's really going on?”
Executing the Innocent?
Commented Sep 18, 2008 at 22:54:10 in Politics
“Part 1
I am not willing to tell this government, or any government that it is alright to kill me, if I commit a crime. While some people like to euphemistically call it the "Death Penalty", I prefer to call it, what it is, an Official Government Execution of a Citizen. There are unofficial executions also, killing by police etc., but that is another story. We allow the government to kill any of us, but they choose to only kill certain of us. We all know the profile of those being killed. Is it part of our agreement with our government, that they only kill the poor? One way to deter murder, would be to solve every murder case. Unless we do that, the idea of a deterrent for a crime like murder, is absurd. Murder is almost always, a crime of passion. It is inconceivable that one, would hesitate to commit murder due the threat of being executed, when the alternative is spending the rest of your life in prison.”
I am not willing to tell this government, or any government that it is alright to kill me, if I commit a crime. While some people like to euphemistically call it the "Death Penalty", I prefer to call it, what it is, an Official Government Execution of a Citizen. There are unofficial executions also, killing by police etc., but that is another story. We allow the government to kill any of us, but they choose to only kill certain of us. We all know the profile of those being killed. Is it part of our agreement with our government, that they only kill the poor? One way to deter murder, would be to solve every murder case. Unless we do that, the idea of a deterrent for a crime like murder, is absurd. Murder is almost always, a crime of passion. It is inconceivable that one, would hesitate to commit murder due the threat of being executed, when the alternative is spending the rest of your life in prison.”
Sarah Palin's Churches and The Third Wave: New Video Documentary
Commented Sep 07, 2008 at 23:27:41 in Politics
“I believe that each of us deserve the right to practice, any religion, that we choose, however we do not have to encourage, this sort of thing. It seems to me that while people are entitled to believe this crap, it is our right as Americans, that they should not be given decision making responsibility, since they are not in a position to make objective decisions.”
Why is No One Calling the Anthrax Suspect a Terrorist?
Commented Aug 09, 2008 at 09:59:43 in Media
“Many people felt that the anthrax attack was part of the terror of 911. Are we to assume that this right wing, anti-choice, Christian, Bruce Ivins, was on the same team, with the 19 Saudi Arabian guys with Koran's, box cutters, and amazing luck. Apparently they were lucky enough to get on the planes without tickets. They also got very lucky when they picked the time for the attacks, it just happened that the military was playing war games that day, which worked out well because the military did not attempt to interfere with the attacks.The pentagon recently admitted, that our planes did not even leave the ground, during those two hours. Many questions remain about what happened that fateful day, but people are researching 911, and seeing the videos. I'm surprised that Ivins did not leave a written confession, as part of the 'suicide' story.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------”
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------”
Popular Vote v. Electoral College (Why The Media Badly Needs A History Lesson)
Commented Aug 08, 2008 at 01:12:44 in Politics
“If everyone who was entitled to vote and wanted to vote, was allowed to vote. If every vote was certain to be counted, If it was the popular vote, that was counted, rather than the electoral college, then I would be very confident that Obama was going to win. After two questionable presidential elections maybe this time, the winner will be the one who gets the most votes.”
nomobull replied on Aug 08, 2008 at 02:01:03
“gore won the supreme court took it away. bush won over kerry by a few million votes so the one with the popular vote actually does win look at the chart .”
Titty Jokes and a Bush Smirk: it's the New John McCain
Commented Aug 06, 2008 at 01:38:49 in Politics
“It has become a tradition that male Republican politicians don't really like women. Some prefer congressional pages, while others prefer picking up policeman in public toilets. Then we have McCains transvestite pal in New York who is known for announcing his most recent divorce on TV, before he told his wife. It is no surprise to me, that "Blinky" McCain, who left his previous wife to marry the beauty contest winner, and beer heiress, Cindy McCain . Remember Newt Gingrich who asked his wife for a divorce while she was in the hospital. A couple of years ago we have also had a male hooker spending a lot of time at the White House. Maybe he was just coming to see Karl.”
mergina replied on Aug 06, 2008 at 06:03:20
“They only want women for having kids for tax exemptions.”
Barack Obama Just Loves Young White Women
Commented Aug 03, 2008 at 21:30:20 in Politics
“Hundreds of millions off dollars, are being invested in each of these campaigns. They know exactly how people will react. McCains' campaign strategists are aiming this one at their base. They're trying to create more hostility toward Obama, among the most racist among us. I don't think they have to worry about losing those votes. How is it that these same people don't seem to notice that Clarence Thomas has a wife who is white. Is it color that they object to, so strongly, or is it something else?”
The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder
Commented May 22, 2008 at 20:17:01 in Politics
“When the war began, I was among those individuals, and there were many of us, who did not believe that Saddam Hussein had anything to do with 911 . We also knew that there was nothing, that Saddam could do, to avoid the coming war. The weapons inspectors found nothing, and they were searching freely, without interference. Many of us knew early in the Bush presidency, that he was not always telling the truth. I have noticed that he often misled us about seemingly unimportant things too, such as the date, that he gave up golf. The last time that he was seen publicly playing golf, was 2 months after he said that he had stopped playing, and coincided with a torn ligament and sore knee. Apparently he gave up golf because of how it looked, to the people, whose kids were dying, in Iraq, Afghanistan, and elsewhere, and he gave up running because of his injured knee. It was just a coincidence that it happened to be at the same time. Remember when Bush warned us to never listen to wild conspiracy theories about 911. He should have kept his mouth shut, because now 66% of those asked, in a recent poll, say that they believe that it possible that some members of his government, may have been complicit, in the events of 911.”
synapse369 replied on May 25, 2008 at 11:57:48
“Thank you for the info. Could you please provide the link to the poll you cite where "66% of those asked...say they believe that it is possible, etc".”
pa104inf replied on May 25, 2008 at 09:34:14
“First off, President Bush never said that Saddam had anything to do with 9-11. What he believed as well as most of the world is that Saddam was involved in the production of WMD's. After all, Saddam used them on the Kurds without a problem. Get your facts straight. As far as Saddam goes, all he had to do was cooperate with the inspectors and all would have been well. Therefore, he could have done something.”


