HuffPost Social News

VA Lady2008's Comments (246)

View Comments:   Sort:
next
1 - 25 of 246
Landrieu: Keith Bardwell Should Be Dismissed For Denying Marriage Licenses To Interracial Couples

Landrieu: Keith Bardwell Should Be Dismissed For Denying Marriage Licenses To Interracial Couples

Commented Oct 17, 2009 at 07:38:49 in Politics

“This bigot has been a judge for 34 years, with I presume the same attitude for his entire tenure. Is there anyone here with an education and a three-digit IQ who thinks this is the FIRST TIME someone has complained? Or is it just the first time that someone has complained, and someone actually listened?

Part of the listening involves the Internet. Hate, bigotry and lawlessness do their jobs best when covered up and kept dark, and the Internet acts as a real ball of sunshine in exposing this kind of hatefulness.

This judge has been elected and re-elected without opposition EVERY SINGLE TIME. This says quite a bit about the parish, where--pre­sumably--a­t least some black people, or half black people, or black people with white blood, or white people with black blood live.

None of what it says is good: I suspect were a real Department of Justice to look further into the matter it would find out that a good many non-whites don't vote in the parish, either because they have been discouraged, or just aren't allowed.

We'd also find out that the white so-called people, a lot of them anyway, think the judge's opinions are just fine.”

MacManLB replied on Oct 17, 2009 at 07:51:46

“What angers me is that he has lived very well off of the tax payers money. He has never had to worry about food, shelter, clothing, healthcare, etc. He should have to pay back the money for all of those years. However, he is not the only republican who suckles at the tit of the government while denying the constitutional rights of citizens. He must not be able to walk away without being punished for his crimes. The people should protest in front of his house day and night.”
Frist Addresses Tennessee's Birther Problem

Frist Addresses Tennessee's Birther Problem

Commented Oct 17, 2009 at 07:30:50 in Politics

“The flailing GOP leadership has been more than happy with the tea-baggers, who demonstrate that it's a lot more fun to party on than to try to figure out actual, WORKABLE solutions to real problems.

The tea-baggers, for their part, while funded at least in part, and at second hand by the GOP, have demonstrated a surprising unwillingness to play along. Witness their refusal to allow RNC Chairman Steele to speak at their summer sheniaguins. Even so, the GOP has cozied up to these crazies, because they see money and votes in the pot.

The trouble here is that the "stuff" in the pot is fools gold. These screamers, who include gun nuts, racists, bigots, haters and criminals-­-including people who would be more than happy to pick up their NRA-GOP authorized and condoned assault rifles to "water the ground" with blood, have demonstrated that some of that blood might well come from insufficiently like minded Republicans.

This faction of the party has always been with us, one way or another, but lacks the votes to win a national race and in fact, is pushing the remaining moderates (including this socially progressive, pay as you go fiscal conservative, who has long since been booted from the tent) away from the party, as well as disgusting the increasingly large number of independents.

Finally, the remaining intelligent members of the GOP have realized that cozying up to the crazies is going to cost them.

What delightful symmetry.”
Sarah Palin's Ratings Plummet To An All Time Low In Poll

Sarah Palin's Ratings Plummet To An All Time Low In Poll

Commented Oct 17, 2009 at 07:21:51 in Politics

“The apparently charming (in small doses) Sarah Palin, who has a truly hard core specialty: creating fear, hatred, anger and pain. Leading Republicans wince at her appearances and commentary, they probably don't even believe the polling numbers, because they can SEE the apparently unending pot of gold she's raking in. She energizes conservatives and aggravates Democrats.

Given that, they're not likely to rein her in. The telegenic rabble rowser, although she will claim, probably correctly, that she represents her own unique personal point of view has been co-opted by the a failing, and flailing about, Republican hierarchy to do the ultimate dirty job: get her adherents focused on hate and fear, so they won't bother to think.

The trouble here is that the "stuff" in the pot is fools gold. Ms. Palin and her like minded adherents can make a lot of noise and trouble, but lack the votes to win a national race and in fact, are pushing the remaining moderates (including this socially progressive, pay as you go fiscal conservative, who has long since been booted from the tent) away from the party, as well as disgusting the increasingly large number of independents.

In the long run, what passes for the GOP leadership will see that they've sold their positions, party, and country for a mess of stinking cabbage.”
McCain Admits Tensions Over Palin Among Former Staff (VIDEO)

McCain Admits Tensions Over Palin Among Former Staff (VIDEO)

Commented Oct 11, 2009 at 19:08:46 in Politics

“I was still marginally considering voting for McCain--I crossed party lines to vote for him in the primary in 2001-- UNTIL they nominated the slick chick hillbilly from Wasilla.

From the first words out of her mouth, I knew she was not just completely unfit--tem­permentall­y and intellectually--but totally unqualified to be sitting one heartbeat away from a presidency that might go to a 70 year old plus cancer surviver.”

Bogstomper replied on Oct 11, 2009 at 19:42:06

“"From the first words out of her mouth..."

I was so against McCain by that time that Palin didn't make much difference. To me, she's just one of many flawed bricks in the conservative wall.”
Debtors' Revolt: Bank Of America Cuts Deal With Another YouTuber

Debtors' Revolt: Bank Of America Cuts Deal With Another YouTuber

Commented Oct 09, 2009 at 15:47:13 in Business

“This is nothing. Today, Friday, at 3:09 pm I made a $200 cash deposit in person to my local Wachovia Branch. I was informed that not only would my deposit not be credited for today, it wouldn't be credited for Saturday OR Monday. The cutoff time was apparently 3:00.

I listened to two lame sets of the same regurgitated babblespeak and called them out for what they are: THIEVES.

There were prominent signs all over the bank noting that the bank would be OPEN on Monday, Columbus Day, which is unusual, but NO WHERE did they say that they'd be grabbing my money, and the money of (probably millions) of fellow depositors and pocketing the floating interest.

I know many of you are incensed at BOA, and as a former BOA customer driven out by bad customer service, I can't say I blame you. However: I walked one block and across the street and asked BOA what their policy was and was told that as long as I made the deposit by closing time (6:00 pm on Friday) at the counters, or by 8:00 pm in the ATM, I would be credited for today.

I'll be opening a new account elsewhere on Monday, and will transfer the bulk of my savings immediately. As soon as I can get the direct deposit paycheck transferred and all my checks clear, it's AMF to Wachovia.

They all stink.”

wolfgangmo replied on Oct 09, 2009 at 16:14:16

“Try a small local bank or a credit union.

You will not be sorry.”
CIGNA Employee Flips Off Mother Of Dead Girl Denied Transplant

CIGNA Employee Flips Off Mother Of Dead Girl Denied Transplant

Commented Oct 08, 2009 at 17:06:46 in Business

“Did Cigna fire the employees involved? Did Cigna even discipline them?

I thought not.”
Scalia Defends Cross On Public Land, Claims It Represents Everyone

Scalia Defends Cross On Public Land, Claims It Represents Everyone

Commented Oct 08, 2009 at 11:47:38 in Politics

“To Antonin Scalia, I'm sure the cross really does represent "everybody­."

That would be everybody who counts, in his opinion. You all know: the right kind of people. White Republican Christian men.

That cross does not me, my family, or my son.”

KillgoreTrout43 replied on Oct 08, 2009 at 11:49:16

“Do you have any relatives buried there?”
Ensign Confronted Outside Office By CNN, Denies Affair Wrongdoing (VIDEO)

Ensign Confronted Outside Office By CNN, Denies Affair Wrongdoing (VIDEO)

Commented Oct 07, 2009 at 07:37:09 in Politics

“I suspect that Senator Ensign WILL testify, because he'll be responding to a grand jury subpoena, and he'll be under oath, as well. However, as we know in our bones, Republicans have absolutely no problem lying under oath--at this moment I imagine he is creatively making up exactly how he'll word his eventual allocution­...which he will be forced to give when he pleads guilty, as have so many before him.

My prediction is that he will testify, he will lie, and eventually some sharpie in the DOJ will nail him for perjury. And then, some other sharpie in the IRS, will nail him and his parents for tax evasion in the matter of the "gifts" to the mistress and her family.

Those who do not study history are doomed to repeat it. Former Senator Bob Ney remains in stir for , among other things, lying in the Abramoff case. Scooter Libby was convicted, but never served a day, for obstruction, making false statements, and perjury. Al Capone actually went to jail for income tax evasion.

Republicans of the Ensign persuasion think that truth is elastic, words mean what they THINK they mean, and that following the law is for little people, like you and me to follow, and taxes are also for little people,

Well now, finally, it's the little people's collective turn.”
NRCC: Pelosi Should Be

NRCC: Pelosi Should Be "Put In Her Place" By McChrystal

Commented Oct 06, 2009 at 20:02:11 in Politics

“Where have I heard of this scenario before? Oh, right, in the barely believable Fletcher Knebel's novel (and later movie) Seven Days in May. A thoughtful President, an arrogant-out-of the chain of command 4 star general who wants to be president, a bunch of loonies from the other party: all trying like mad to unseat, somehow, an elected president to install a "we can control him" General.

It didn't work out for the general in the novel, or the movie, and I suspect the denouement will be the same in real life. : the general will be allowed to retire, with no reduction in rank or retired pay.

We have a chain of military command in this country: it starts at the top, with the President of the United States. McChrystal actually got a favor in meeting with the President, and one that he obviously neither appreciated nor deserved. The President is well within his rights to do his communicating thru the Sec Def, or General Petraeus, although Petraeus, no matter what he claims, obviously has been out of action for the past couple of months for radiation treatment of prostate cancer.

All the braying and howling of the tin-foil hat brigade in time can't change it.”

Truthtalker1963 replied on Oct 06, 2009 at 20:21:04

“You forgot: Obama appointed a 4-star so he would have direct communications. Glad you at least read some of the facts though...t­hough your end assessment is messy and incorrect. But that's okay.”

Dosadi replied on Oct 06, 2009 at 20:07:39

“Correct, besides what would people who look up to Rusbo as their leader know about command or chains for that matter, or anything.”
Kate Gosselin Has Unpaid Bills, Angry Kids (VIDEO)

Kate Gosselin Has Unpaid Bills, Angry Kids (VIDEO)

Commented Oct 05, 2009 at 17:10:45 in Entertainment

“Well said.”
Greenspan: No Second Stimulus, We're

Greenspan: No Second Stimulus, We're "Getting Close" To End Of Job Losses (VIDEO)

Commented Oct 05, 2009 at 09:03:24 in Politics

“We're facing 10 percent unemployment, and far more were you to add in the underemployed, and those who have just given up even looking for work because there are, according to the NYT 6 unemployeed people for every job available. We've bankrupted the country by giving tax cuts to the wealthy while squandering our honor, dignity, and blood on a foolish war of choice, not necessity, and then faility to PAY for it. We've given free reign to do anything they want to the likes of banks, major corporations, health insurance companies, food producers, drug producers--on Alan Greenspan's lunatic theory that corporations will behave in their best interests. All of these things occurred on Greenspan's watch, and not only did he not lift a finger to STOP any of it, he encouraged it and provided the intellectual enabling necessary to allow it all to happen.

It's not as if George Bush could have thought of any of these things himself.

Quick someone, explain to me why we should listen to ANYTHING Alan Greenspan--who like his faux god George Bush--is busily attempting to rewrite history to clean up his own role in creating and enabling this mess.”
Krugman: The Modern Conservative Movement

Krugman: The Modern Conservative Movement "Has The Emotional Maturity Of A Bratty 13-Year-Old"

Commented Oct 05, 2009 at 08:56:38 in Politics

“When Krugman writes that the Republicas are behaving like a bunch of bratty 13 year olds, he just blows past the fact that the Democrats used to behave that way as well. Back in the late 1960s and early 1970s, when I was coming of age, much of the "activity" of the Democratic party was centered on a huge fight between "youth"--who wanted free love, and an end to war, and an end to bigotry, and "maturity" which had slipped into supporting a horrible war (mostly because it was too stubborn to admit it had been swindled) and which was, now notoriously, moving away from the racial bigotry of the south.

The Democrats of the day could fairly have been called bratty 13 year olds; the Republicans, at least those who showed prominently in public, as mature, responsible, intellectually sharp adults.

What a change we've seen. Now it is the Democrats who are the grown ups. All semblance of honor, dignity, intellectual rigor, fiscal probity, and a willingness to look out for anyone except themselves has vanished from the Republican Party.

I was long since booted from this increasingly tiny tent. Actuarily, I have less than two decades left to attain readmission, before I shuffle off to a much bigger tent.

With the current crew in charge, I not only see no possibility of being invited back. Even if I were, I wouldn't be interested in going.”

exflatlander replied on Oct 05, 2009 at 09:21:12

“We are of the same age, apparently, yet our memory of history varies. I remember that it was Lyndon Johnson, a Democrat, that enacted so much of our landmark social legislation which the GOP opposed. True, he promoted a war that many Democrats disagreed with and ended up deciding not to run again because he knew he wouldn't win, even in his own party.

Meanwhile, Richard Nixon, seizing on a chance to turn the conservative older generation against those young, scraggly war protesters (who certainly weren't Republicans!), unleashed Spiro Agnew's hate mongering to win the election. He also initiated the southern strategy which carried away with him all those racist Democrats and social conservatives in the party. it was because the Democratic Party was answering to a ( war aside) higher social responsibility to ALL the people, that Nixon prevailed with his divide and conquer politics, which has been working for the Republicans ever since.

Having just read "A Team of Rivals" I was struck with how much the two parties have flip-flopped in values and tactics. Today Lincoln would be an avowed Democrat. He was a middle-of-the-road, skinny, one term Congressman from Illinois who presumed to criticize a sitting president about a trumped up war ( Mexican). Sound familiar?”
<em>WSJ</em>: Ensign's Senate Prospects Grow Cloudy

WSJ: Ensign's Senate Prospects Grow Cloudy

Commented Oct 04, 2009 at 06:22:02 in Home

“The trolls have lied so often, about so many things, and for such a long time that they are incapable of telling the truth.

Most of them probably think they're pretty sharp, and can tell when they're being lied to, because they have so much practice doing it in person. In my observation, however, being a congenital liar doesn't mean you actually can recognize when you're being lied to.

Just ask everyone who fell for King Cheney's lies about WMD in Iraq. They believed that, too.”
John Ensign Scandal: Senate Republicans Decline To Defend Colleague

John Ensign Scandal: Senate Republicans Decline To Defend Colleague

Commented Oct 03, 2009 at 07:44:05 in Politics

“Republicans don't believe in paying taxes: taxes are for poor people, powerless people, and Democrats. Republicans only believe in sucking in tax money. In their corporate enthusiasm to buy off the Senator's mistress (and her husband) they might not have violated any campaign laws (although that is yet to be determined) but they may have gotten crosswise of the IRS.

Hello, Al Capone? Can you hear them talking?

The rules on gift taxes are clear and specific: you may make as many gifts to as many different people in a year, up to a total of $12,000 per person, without incurring any tax penalty. The tax covers cash, services, and articles (like stock, or bonds) at their fair market value. I suspect any effort to hide the nature of the gift, let's say of the Ensign parents EACH gave $12,000 to the mistress, would be considered as a single gift. I think it would also classify as a willful failure, which invokes a penalty.

A big one.”

Punkynsnow replied on Oct 03, 2009 at 09:16:40

“I think it would be great to see the IRS get involved. Anyone who's ever dealt with them knows what a quagmire that is; you are guilty until you can somehow prove you're innocent, and all the while the penalties and interest are accruing faster than the charges on a NYC taxi stuck in traffic.

I thought I heard something the other night indicating that the payments actually came from a trust fund set up by Ensign parents; wonder if anyone knows anything about that?”
Sarah Palin's E-Book Delayed; Publisher Stressing Hardcover Sales Of

Sarah Palin's E-Book Delayed; Publisher Stressing Hardcover Sales Of "Going Rogue"

Commented Sep 30, 2009 at 13:39:48 in Media

“Occasionally, the epithet "rogue" is applied to man, and always preceded by the adverb "charming.­" The idea is that while the person is utterly dishonest, in inferior, he is also at least charming, which is how he gets away with it.

Only the odious Ms Palin, uneducated yahoo that she remains, would deliberately apply the full epithet to herself.”

sippewissett replied on Sep 30, 2009 at 16:24:32

“Don't overlook other applications of "rogue" as in "rogue state" and "rogue elephant". Neither of those is a savory use of the word.”
Palin Lectures Not Selling, No One Wants To Book Her: <i>NY Post</i>

Palin Lectures Not Selling, No One Wants To Book Her: NY Post

Commented Sep 30, 2009 at 13:36:52 in Politics

“I believe it's fair to say that if someone told the NY Post (owned, after a fashion, by the odious Rupert Murdock) that Ms. Palin's lectures weren't selling, and there wasn't much interest in her book (to be published by Harper Collins, owned, after a fashion also by the odious Rupert Murdock) and the Post was permitted/saw fit to publish the information, it's probably true.

How frightening to think that this dimwitted, uneducated yahoo came as close as she did to being one heartbeat away from the presidency.”

DinSea replied on Sep 30, 2009 at 14:11:38

“This is why I lost all respect for the other "Maverick" ...”

obama20082012 replied on Sep 30, 2009 at 13:39:59

“What is more frightening, is that we had a dimwitted uneducated yahoo for Pres for 8 years, and that anyone would want to see that again.”
Ashcroft, Yoo Lawsuits: Ex-Bush Officials Sued Over Actions

Ashcroft, Yoo Lawsuits: Ex-Bush Officials Sued Over Actions

Commented Sep 29, 2009 at 08:58:29 in Politics

“Good. Sometimes, regrettably, the ONLY recourse an ordinary person has in the United States, the government having failed abysmally in protecting our rights, is to sue the pants off these suckers.

In previous postings, I've noted that using shame might be the very best "preventive" medicine, at least for the next future felon, but the felonious Constitution busting dogs of the Bush administration are obviously oblivious to shame, and their courting of the tin-foil hatted evangelical fringe voters notwithstanding, none of them believes in God, or the next life or punishment.

Therefore, we citizens have to get them in the only way that we can, and which, ironically, the only thing that will hurt: take away all their money. Take away all their possessions. Bankrupt them, their families, and their children.

Every dime.”
Bachmann Refuses To Answer Question About Dead Census Worker

Bachmann Refuses To Answer Question About Dead Census Worker

Commented Sep 29, 2009 at 08:54:28 in Politics

“The congresswoman's statement, like clues in any good crossword puzzle, except on "easy" day, is subject to several interpretations:

"Thank you so much!" she said.

Was she trying to convey the following:

1. Thank you for doing this, to the perpretrator? After all her poisonous screaming, someone went out and did exactly what she wanted by knocking off a federal official? I'd bet, were she to be threatened, she'd be the first to be screaming for protection. Ms Bachmann is a liar and a bully because she's fundamentally a coward with a big mouth.

2. Thank you for asking me about this, because it's free publicity?

3. Get the heck away from me, because there's a thing called incitement, which in English common law, from which our principles derive, is: In the act of persuading, encouraging, instigating, pressuring, or threatening so as to cause another to commit a crime.

I believe, should this turn out to be a hate crime against a federal official, she could be indicted as an accessory to murder.”
The Five Worst Tarmac Delays: Tell Us Your Story! (PHOTOS)

The Five Worst Tarmac Delays: Tell Us Your Story! (PHOTOS)

Commented Sep 28, 2009 at 13:46:55 in Business

“Not all weather delays are CYAs by the airlines, or at least they didn't USE to be.

Years ago, I was flying out of DCA (Washington National) to Indianapolis, in late August, when the DC area is prone to thunderstorms, and on Friday, probably one of the busier days, so the plane was quite full. I was going home to visit my ailing mother. I was a regular on the 4:35 on Friday afternoons; the flight crew knew me by name. I belted in and closed my eyes. As soon as we pushed back from the gate, I was in dreamland. In those days, a push back was pretty much as good as a takeoff, and I saw no point in losing some shut eye.

Apparently we taxied over to the pad, awaiting a take off slot. And waited. And waited. Now none of that would have roused me, but the chatter from the flight deck did. It went something like this:

"Folks, I've decided to hold here for a couple of minutes. If you look out the left side of the plane (which gave a view, after a fashion, in the dirction of the Potomac) you'll see why." My eyelids popped back and I watched while a humongous bolt of lightnight hit the pavement, probably 200 yards from us.

I went back to snooze land, secure in the knowledge that a real, live, human beinging, a pilot--and proabaly military trained at my expense--was on the case!”
Madoff Trustee Irving Picard: Let Madoff's Sons Go Bankrupt (VIDEO)

Madoff Trustee Irving Picard: Let Madoff's Sons Go Bankrupt (VIDEO)

Commented Sep 28, 2009 at 12:36:55 in Business

“Good. Let them go bankrupt, at a minimum, but that's not nearly enough to prevent these perverts from striking again.

The United States, preceded by the American colonies, has a long history of using SHAME to keep people in line, sometimes as a part of legal proceedings and sometimes when the law simply cannot. The notion of shame formerly extended not just to the ...crimina­l but to the criminal's family, and was a powerful motivation to straighten up--if not to the potential criminal--at least then to the criminal's family.

The Madoff family has profited by the criminal activity of the husband and father, and for a good long time. "You're poor now, Ruthie" has failed to assist in ferreting out the suspect billions which this criminal conspiracy, aided and abetted by the loose tax laws and lax oversight by the SEC, has apparently managed to secret away somewhere, where they'll eventually flee and live large.

I vote we indict and prosecute them all, and seize and sell at auction absolutely everything, down to the shower curtains. We need to make a few sharp examples around here, and this would be a good place to start.”

KarateKid replied on Sep 28, 2009 at 12:44:24

“They should do to the Madoff sons what the British courts did to Robert Maxwell's sons: take away their passports. This was to prevent just what you mentioned, fleeing to a country with no extradition laws and living the good life.”
Census Worker Killed By Asphyxiation: Police

Census Worker Killed By Asphyxiation: Police

Commented Sep 27, 2009 at 06:45:40 in Politics

“Current theories on the motive behind the death of Census worker Bill Sparkman seem to include:

Meth/marijuana producers, fearful of discovery and jail, and NOT TOO BRIGHT, murder him and string him up as an example.

Anti-government hate groups, fearful of discovery of their stupidity--but understanding that stupidity is not indictable--figure they'll murder him and string him up as an example.

The fact that the body was exposed to the elements for a time, possibly quite a long time, will make this crime difficult for the local law enforacement--which apparently let's the meth producers and the marijuana growers have their way with the district-- to solve, but whoever is responsible failed to consider Mr. Sparkman's part time job: he was a federal official, of a kind, and that makes his murder a federal crime.

Enter the FBI, at a minimum. Let's hope they do a better job here than they seem to have done, lately.”

RedDogBear replied on Sep 27, 2009 at 11:35:28

“People have a very distorted view of the FBI. Miss Hoover was great at getting publicity but not much else. Even going back to the old time bank robbers and gangsters that the FBI supposedly caught, when you look at the real history the local police usually did the brunt of the work and the FBI would sweep in at the last minute and either F* things up so the crooks got away (that happened more than once) or let the locals grab the perp while the FBI took all the credit. They have always been an incompetent, CYA, organization that awarded suck ups and brown nosers rather than competent agents. Its why people like John O'Neil end up leaving. And of course the Bush administration was the gold standard for suck ups and brown nosers so the FBI went even further down hill under him. However, based on the lack of interest by the locals, it took them this long even to rule it a murder?! (if they even have I've heard conflicting things) I agree the FBI is probably the only chance. I hope Obama has had enough time to start turning it around. (He has so little to do)”
Meg Whitman Voting Record: Ex-eBay CEO's Voting Record Questioned At GOP Meeting

Meg Whitman Voting Record: Ex-eBay CEO's Voting Record Questioned At GOP Meeting

Commented Sep 27, 2009 at 06:34:03 in Politics

“Ms Whitman is a businesswoman, with every unsavory, dishonest, creepy, anti-American, destructive, lying trait that we've come to associate, sadly, with a formerly respectable profession: business people, CEOs, and MBA's (think George W. Bush). ALL these people really care about is the bottom line for the next quarter, and staying out of jail. They don't give two hoots about next year, much less the next decade.

These people have done everything in their power to destroy the middle class, which ought to be their prime customers, by downsizing their staffs, offshoring the work force, and generally gutting America. All in favor of their personal holy grail: positive results and a smile from Wall Street.

Now, under their leadership, aided, abetted, and led by an intellectually inferior and morally bankrupt Republican party, they intend to MOVE on from the current wreckage, into politics, where they think that somehow, magically, they'll get their second wind and restore the old regime. Meaning they'll get richer, at the expense of the rest of us working stiffs.

Well, now, the stiffs--the ones with three-digit IQs, have wised up, and it's OUR turn. Let the run. Let them hew ever farther and farther to the tin-foil hatted, teabagging crazies. The more the better. Meaning the more of this, the more Democrats we'll see elected.”

cef911f1 replied on Sep 27, 2009 at 06:57:32

“You're first paragraph says a lot about what is wrong with this country. No long term thinking; only short term gain with little regard for the consequences.”

teepeeyoyo replied on Sep 27, 2009 at 06:48:38

“Fanned!!”
Allen Stanford Hospitalized After Fight With Another Inmate

Allen Stanford Hospitalized After Fight With Another Inmate

Commented Sep 26, 2009 at 13:13:46 in Business

“The core principle of incarceration upon conviction is punishment. Sadly, we Americans don't much go for "rehabilitation" which I happen to think is a mistake, but that would be for another comment.

Allen Stansford, as far as I know, has been convicted of NOTHING, although the public, and I suspect law enforcement, is reasonably certain he is guilty of plenty, and probably far more than he'll ever stand trial for. Once indicted, tried, and IF convicted, let the punishment roll on, and let's be clear here: it needs to be extraordinarily long, uncomfortable, painful, and embarrassing. Shame, regrettably, has left the American psyche, but the punishment for his alleged misdeeds, should be sufficient that everyone in his family is forced to change his or her surname to avoid embarrassment.

That said, his pre-trial detention should be designed to prevent flight, and ONLY to prevent flight. I'd say that getting beat up in a jail house fight probably is not part of the pre-trial, flight-avoidance incarceration policy, and that any police department or law enforcement group that permits this likely can, and SHOULD be sued until their pants fall off.

It's not that I don't believe in punishment, which certainly will come later, but I do believe in taking things in their proper order.”

GrahamInCanada replied on Sep 26, 2009 at 14:00:02

“I applaud your comments on pre-trial detention.

At the same time, I am appalled at your description of after-trial punishment.

The laws of the United States have only authorized three punishments upon conviction: loss of property, loss of right to liberty, and loss of right to life. Anything else is beyond the pale, and the loss of life part is ruining the reputation of the United States.

The prisons of the United States were not always the violent, sexually traumatic, racist cess pools that they are now reputed to be, and the citizens of the United States did not used to desire that they should be.”

comicpro replied on Sep 26, 2009 at 13:59:19

“All I want to say is if he is so innocent then juts have him give all the people there money back and that would clear him of any wrongdoing. But I guess they are having a hard time finding all that cash so what do we suppose to do with "Sir Allen"? Dude is guilty as hell and stevie Wonder can see that. If he got into a fight in jail big deal. Happens all the time in prison.”

Michael Valentine replied on Sep 26, 2009 at 13:36:58

“Justice for the rich should be the same as it is for the poor. Don't like the conditions of the prisons and jails in America? Fix it.”

GoDogGo replied on Sep 26, 2009 at 13:29:55

“All well and good, but in the real world, jails are overcrowded with competing interests vying for power. That he's been charged (but not yet convicted) is irrelevant: If you don't like jail or prison, don't put yourself in a position to be put there. The overwhelming evidence supports the need for him to be incarcerated. If he's injured in a fight while he's there, well, that's tough.”

glesslib replied on Sep 26, 2009 at 13:24:09

“You are pre-supposing that Sanford didn't start the fight. He's a pretty crafty person. This could be a possible way to get to a safer and easier place to await trial.”
Blue Dog Opposition To Public Option Fades In Whip Count

Blue Dog Opposition To Public Option Fades In Whip Count

Commented Sep 25, 2009 at 07:13:01 in Politics

“A mind is a beautiful thing; it's capable of change. Our solons, once elected, generally do not fear being overturned in the general election. Our elected representatives, who generally aren't very forward looking, think it will stay that way forever. Maybe they think incorrectly.

Lawmakers from each party DO fear primary elections, because such a small proportion of voters control the outcome.

Republican lawmakers are hewing ever to the right (or in the case of the odious Joe Lieberman, actually changing parties) to avoid a primary scrap. They figure they can win the general election.

Meanwhile, the equally craven "conservadems" and others, figure they can pick up a few cheap conservative votes by "showing their independence" forgetting that they were elected as Democrats, and can be replaced by BETTER DEMOCRATS.

There's nothing like a little competition to put the fear of unemployment into these craven men and women. Of course, first we get to watch while they cave to the crazies on both sides (this has been going on since Reagan and the Reaganauts) but now, finally, the majority of voters is utterly disgusted with them all.”
Pat Roberts Pleads For Three-Day Delay So Lobbyists Can Read Health Care Legislation (VIDEO)

Pat Roberts Pleads For Three-Day Delay So Lobbyists Can Read Health Care Legislation (VIDEO)

Commented Sep 24, 2009 at 06:53:05 in Business

“This request, more than anything, shows us exactly what the Party of No is all about. The GOP thinks everything is just fine as it is--they're PAID to do that-- so they don't want to see any changes.

They've had more than enough time, and the fact that they want their thuggish controllers, the lobbyists, to have more time to read it, pretty much says it all.

Move on. Jam it down their throats. Let people have health insurance immediately. Then, in 2010, let them campaign on the fact that they voted against it. Death panels? I'd say the entire GOP is one huge death panel.”

SassySafrine replied on Sep 24, 2009 at 07:13:40

“Excellent!”

bobdolenot replied on Sep 24, 2009 at 06:58:49

“Well said...Ver­y nice...fan­ned and faved.....”

PhilipTaylor replied on Sep 24, 2009 at 06:56:13

“DANCING with the CEOs!
_____________

PAT ROBERTS = The 2.5 Million Dollar Man!

$1.26 Million Health Related +$1.26 Wall Street/Finance

Roberts=72 hour delay so Health LOBBYISTS can CRITIQUE+ REWRITE BILL!

ROBERTS in 2009 = DeLay in 1990's

LOBBYISTS WRITE FINAL BILLS MAXIMIZING CORPORATE PROFITS”
next
1 - 25 of 246