HuffPost Social News

afram1's Comments (78)

View Comments:   Sort:
next
1 - 25 of 78
huffingtonpost entry

Obama's Unavoidable Cure for the Afghanistan Cancer

Commented Dec 03, 2009 at 09:29:47 in World

“There is the known war (in Afghanistan) and there is the shadow war with Special Forces and the like (in Pakistan).

You know that the US is dealing with the Al Qaeda and the Taliban there as well, but the leadership is not talking that up as much because Pakistan is a sovereign nation. Surely you don't think the $30 billion is for Afghanistan only? It is not hard to figure that a portion of that is going to be appropriated for continued operations in Pakistan.”
huffingtonpost entry

Obama's Unavoidable Cure for the Afghanistan Cancer

Commented Dec 03, 2009 at 04:54:06 in World

“And your so-called prescription for dealing with Afghanistan would kill Progressive initiatives for the next 25 years, easy.

Leave Afghanistan with a major power vacuum, let the Taliban worm its way back into power in Afghanistan, gather their forces and gain a greater foothold in Pakistan, get enough power to sneak a nuke or two or three to Al-Qaeda so that they would detonate it in New York or Los Angeles or Chicago or London or Lisbon...

Progressives wouldn't have the ear of regular Americans for FIFTY years.”
huffingtonpost entry

Obama's Unavoidable Cure for the Afghanistan Cancer

Commented Dec 03, 2009 at 04:44:43 in World

“Well you haven't been very nice...

How is it that a recalibrated military objective cannot be achieved? For six years, the forces in Afghanistan were attempting to make well with a lack of personnel and resources.

Here it is: the US is in Afghanistan so that they can keep an eye on Pakistan and monitor the nebulous border between Afghanistan and Pakistan. Pakistan has nukes and their gov't is weak. Afghanistan's government is weak and corrupted. Nukes can't be allowed to fall into the hands of Al Queda, directly or through sympathetic Taliban proxies.”

espressobeans replied on Dec 03, 2009 at 08:03:22

“How are these 30,000 troops on the ground at the price of a million a head and at risk of their own lives going to secure nuclear weapons in Pakistan. If that's the logic, it's really dumb. Kind of like trying to do brain surgery with a bulldozer. It's not the logic. It's the rhetoric.”
huffingtonpost entry

Obama's Unavoidable Cure for the Afghanistan Cancer

Commented Dec 02, 2009 at 23:42:58 in World

“And three of those outstanding men (Jesus, Gandhi and King) yet lost their lives to violence, and the fourth spent 27 years in unjust captivity.

No sane person LIKES waging war, but an antelope isn't going to keep a hungry lion from eating it with pacifism.”

jhamm1 replied on Dec 03, 2009 at 02:24:58

“No $hit, Sherlock.

But evaluating military campaigns in conjunction with whether or not objectives can be achieved is even more vital, and when the geo-political and topographical circumstances all point to a war which cannot be won, it's time to swallow your pride and pull out.”

wordherd replied on Dec 03, 2009 at 00:47:30

“Violence is justified because three man preaching various forms of non-violent revolution violently died?”
huffingtonpost entry

Obama's Unavoidable Cure for the Afghanistan Cancer

Commented Dec 02, 2009 at 23:40:00 in World

“I don't think anybody LIKES (besides maybe the military-i­ndustrial-­complex profiteers who win) President Obama's prescription.

It is a mess...but some work HAS to be put in before the US can just up-and-leave.

Pacifism in a Barbarian's World is NOT a sensible option.”

jhamm1 replied on Dec 03, 2009 at 02:46:21

“Yeah, and a sledgehammer in a chess game doesn't work too well, either.

This has nothing to do with "pacifism" so much as recognizing when military objectives cannot be achieved and resorting to the only sensible option of discontinuing the battle.”

jhamm1 replied on Dec 03, 2009 at 02:37:35

“This has nothing to do with pacifism, you idiot, but merely recognizing when military objectives cannot be achieved, and resorting to the only sensible option of discontinuation.”
huffingtonpost entry

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed And The Death Penalty: Why We Can't Kill Him

Commented Nov 20, 2009 at 22:47:32 in Politics

“This is why progressives opportunities to wield power is fleeting and will occur only in fits and starts.

Pacifists only can be pacifists when there is a hedge of protection around you, and that hedge of protection are those that will fight and stop the Barbarian.

The Barbarian will kick your carcass every day and twice on Sundays. "Animal stupidity?" Hardly, sir. It is the provision of justice to a known enemy. If the crime is heinous enough and the evidence is there, then KSM is due the penalty that were committed through his activities.

(by the way, I do appreciate you for bringing an organized voice to radio from the Left, but I vigorously disagree with you on this)”
huffingtonpost entry

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed And The Death Penalty: Why We Can't Kill Him

Commented Nov 20, 2009 at 16:28:27 in Politics

“Dude, you can say that in all your self-righteousness, but here it is.

Some people really do deserve killing.

I'm sorry if that offends your "Demolition Man" dystopian leanings, but if this country is already plagued with massive cash deficits, why should taxpayers waste a million bucks keeping this guy alive to rot in a prison for the next 20 years?

Sworn enemies who will commit terrorist acts to kill Americans are going to work to do that regardless whether KSM is executed or gets life w/o parole. The military, homeland security and the CIA just have to be vigilant in smoking these bad actors out and catching them.”

TexasDem0 replied on Nov 20, 2009 at 17:53:21

“Is cash more important than justice? You would kill because it's cost effective?

The death penalty costs more in appeals, etc. than lifetime imprisonment does.

Since you're so eager to eliminate this country's enemies, maybe you would consider joining the Army and insist on being assigned to the infantry and being deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan.”

hp blogger Beau Friedlander replied on Nov 20, 2009 at 16:52:44

“Who gets decide who needs to be killed? It's animal stupidity and base fear in action. Someone has to act like a Christian here and turn the other cheek. The only way to move forward, is to move forward, not stay in the moment repeating new iterations of the initial violence ad infinitum.”
huffingtonpost entry

Imagine if the Today's Right-Wing Were Around for Nuremberg

Commented Nov 18, 2009 at 11:24:35 in Politics

“It's a dog whistle euphemism calling for American (read: white) superiority. You don't defer to other countries (i.e. "lessers" of various shades of brown people).

It is dog whistle white supremacy.”
huffingtonpost entry

Getting Higher on the Page

Commented Nov 12, 2009 at 02:31:52 in Politics

“Might be wise to think of the Stupak amendment as an analogue to decision made to continue to allow slavery - if they had not, the Southern colonies would not have been willing to form the United States.

There has been a lot of pain involved and it is FAR from perfect, but we benefit from this nation's existence. The current bill with the Stupak amendment is FAR from the ideal of health care reform, but it does legitimately inch us closer to the goal of ensuring that Americans don't die due to a lack of coverage.”
huffingtonpost entry

Deliver the Goods

Commented Nov 04, 2009 at 14:39:38 in Politics

“It seems like a no-brainer to me...Presi­dent O's campaign touched a spirit that cut across all kinds of demographi­cs...focus on delivering the goods!

Times are tough! Get people jobs and health care! Deliver on things that will get it DONE, not "triggers" and "opt-outs" and loopholes to avoid getting people the services that they need!

If you're not going to strive to do it well, why do it half-hearted and hope that the people won't notice -- or care?”

robbep replied on Nov 04, 2009 at 21:57:07

“I agree a half assed healthcare bill that benefits no one but the insurance companies is worse than doing nothing. Unfortunately, Obama takes the easier softer way on things like this.”
huffingtonpost entry

The Power of Fear and the Obligation to Hope

Commented Nov 04, 2009 at 12:07:48 in Politics

“Keep fighting the good fight.

If you believe you are right, keep struggling until you prevail.”

Wisconsin Dave replied on Nov 04, 2009 at 12:32:10

“Problem is, the marriage license law will always violate the conscience
of society, the majority if only Judeo-Christian values are harmed, the
conscience of the minority if Judeo-Christian marriage is the law of the land.”
huffingtonpost entry

One Year Ago, One Year From Now

Commented Nov 03, 2009 at 18:45:06 in Politics

“Let's not give up on the President, and let's not quit on the agenda.

If we want what we say we want, we are going to have to write, to represent, to stand up. Let's praise President O when he takes a forward step and let him know how we feel when we feel he's messing up.

It's easy to get caught up in politics like it's a sports event - up and downs, shifts in momentum, etc. The immediate moment is overplayed as the totality of a situation.

Let's keep struggling together to change this country for the better.”
Obama One Year Later: The Audacity of Winning vs. The Timidity of Governing

Obama One Year Later: The Audacity of Winning vs. The Timidity of Governing

Commented Nov 03, 2009 at 02:43:41 in Politics

“Where are the new bloods? People with new ideas akin to Obama's dreams? Why are they not in his administration?

A lot of them have been marginalized by the WhackJob Right as socialists­/communist­s/fascists­.”

kndam72 replied on Nov 03, 2009 at 09:44:43

“and why should Obama and his administration care what the right thinks of his appointments.

Obama is conducting the presidency like he is still on the campaign trail.

Wake up! you won! now govern please!”
The Public Option in Congress Is Now a Sham. Who Cares If Lieberman Kills It?

The Public Option in Congress Is Now a Sham. Who Cares If Lieberman Kills It?

Commented Nov 01, 2009 at 00:46:39 in Politics

“If you want to make this less-than-ideal existing House bill better, throw in the considerations of Sen. Ron Wyden to increase the pool of members and manage costs.”
The Public Option in Congress Is Now a Sham. Who Cares If Lieberman Kills It?

The Public Option in Congress Is Now a Sham. Who Cares If Lieberman Kills It?

Commented Nov 01, 2009 at 00:45:24 in Politics

“At the end of the day, for me, it comes to this.

President Obama knows he cannot sign a junk bill, because we will make the Democratic Party pay for their capitulation to Big Insurance/PhRMA in this deal. If costs are not controlled with health care reform, either a Democratic majority will have to come back to this to make it better, or a Republican majority will come back and hopefully kill it (but I think it would be used as a tool to turn the screws on us).

We just have to keep at it on Reid/Pelosi/Obama and let these folks know that this is not what we signed up for. I still believe barring denial of pre-existing conditions and capping liability are significant. Even with a neutered PO, if I lost my job, I would be eligible for the PO, which should be more affordable­...

I am NOT going to start to call the President names. I still advocate for a just public option, and I stand on the belief that President Obama is not going to sign any old piece of junk and call it a "win."”
So What if a Public Option Leads to Single-Payer?

So What if a Public Option Leads to Single-Payer?

Commented Oct 31, 2009 at 14:31:30 in Politics

“"As many as possible" only is in the discussion because of the horse trading political process.

Trust me, if progressives didn't have to deal with Republican obstructionists and conservative Democrats who are more beholden to insurance profit-makers rather than the PEOPLE THAT THEY SHOULD REPRESENT, "as many as possible" wouldn't be the goal...it would be "everyone.­"

Not the most honest argument, guy.”

mikefina replied on Oct 31, 2009 at 18:54:27

“An ahistorical, and uniformed reply. Rights aren't reserved for some. And if it were truly a 'right' you couldn't horsetrade it, to borrow your phrasing.

Pay attention.”
The Public Option in Congress Is Now a Sham. Who Cares If Lieberman Kills It?

The Public Option in Congress Is Now a Sham. Who Cares If Lieberman Kills It?

Commented Oct 31, 2009 at 14:17:44 in Politics

“You know folks, I've been disappointed in this iteration of the bill as well, but after looking at the highlights of the plan, there is a key option that WILL HELP AMERICANS:

• Patient out-of-pocket expenditures for health care will be capped at $10,000 per family.

That means it will be far harder for a family to go bankrupt over health care. Even with a milquetoast public option, that's BIG people...t­hat is a win for the American people.

If that feature holds up and is legit, I'll be honest with you folks...I think I could get behind this plan regardless. If you CANNOT be declined for pre-existing conditions, and your out-of-pocket is CAPPED at $10K...tha­t is a good package, people. Not the best, but one heck of a starting point.”

Awake-and-Sing replied on Oct 31, 2009 at 23:37:45

“NO. Forcing tens of millions of people to purchase overpriced, unreliable for-profit insurance at extortion level rates its not worth that one provision.

At this point I wish progressives would declare war on the mandate for it is clear that we aren't going to get anything that will lower "costs" (a.k.a. exorbitant executive pay and bonuses).

There has been so much talk about the public option but almost none about the mandate. The progressives need to make the mandate the issue now.

It is immoral to force people who cannot afford insurance now to buy for-profit insurance or even a public-option that will be more expensive than private insurance because it is designed to fail.

Since the deal between Obama/Eman­uel/Baucus to trade a mandate for everyone to buy for-profit insurance with no public option or cost controls in exchange for a huge industry campaign contribution is likely now, the least we can do is drop the mandate.

The welfare of poor, working class and middle class people is far more important than having a bill, any bill, for a DLC-to-the-bone, corporate shill of a President to sign.”

psychodog replied on Oct 31, 2009 at 14:35:06

“If there's a $10K cap for out-of-pocket expenditures, I assume that does not count premiums paid, only deductibles.

So insurance companies will instead raise premiums to compensate for this cap, and raise deductibles across the board... they'll get their money one way or another, especially with a public option that doesn't make them compete.”
The Public Option in Congress Is Now a Sham. Who Cares If Lieberman Kills It?

The Public Option in Congress Is Now a Sham. Who Cares If Lieberman Kills It?

Commented Oct 30, 2009 at 22:56:58 in Politics

“It's hard to disagree with this take.

However...­keep in mind...if "those others" get their hands on the levers of power again, they will game the system so that they will NEVER "lose" again.

The people are going to have to small "p" politic as well...we are going to have to come out strong enough on political positions to make President Obama do what we desire.”
huffingtonpost entry

The Moment's "Why" Questions

Commented Oct 28, 2009 at 18:46:20 in Politics

“The answer to all of your questions, Mr. Sirota, is the gatekeepers who glom the levers of power in this nation want to keep it center-right.

Progressives are a significant bloc in this country, but they do not yet have the critical mass to do whatever they want. The naked truth is that, even among Democrats, progressive may make up 40 percent - TOPS - within the party.”
huffingtonpost entry

In the Case of Rush Limbaugh, Activism Once Again Prevails

Commented Oct 19, 2009 at 22:51:53 in Politics

“Referring to New Orleans Ray Nagin as "Nayger."

Nagin may be a lousy mayor, maybe even corrupt, but that was NOT COOL.”
huffingtonpost entry

Shall We Take This Opportunity To Eradicate the Middle Class?

Commented Oct 18, 2009 at 15:25:22 in Politics

“Anytime the free marketers see an opportunity to starve the beast, they seek to do it.

People will "work harder" to find jobs when they're hungry and desperate (i.e. - no social safety net) - which means they will accept lower wages...if you accept their call to abolish the minimum wage, and extending this logic to the full conclusion, it means that wages would depress and the American middle class would be working for third-world level wages.

Let us also consider the added tension the hunt for jobs would have on the populace. It means that racial and ethnic division could be more easily played, which improves the environment for neoconservative Republicans to be elected.

We all saw what such a world would look like...Fra­nk Capra showed us Potterville from "It's A Wonderful Life" in 1946!

Only a super-greedy, self-interested megalomaniacs wants a world like that! Sane people need to keep fighting the want for such insanity!”

Rogan replied on Oct 19, 2009 at 07:27:37

“When, insurance or not, a married couple consisting of a successful lawyer and a (highly paid, when working) writer, are immediately forced into bankruptcy by the medical bills when serious illness calls - when that same couple, day in and day out, cannot afford to spend more than fifty dollars a month, on anything "discretionary," for fun, to relax, or to develop their personal infrastructure, because of the ongoing costs of medical treatments and medication­s... when such things happen - as they do, have, and are, to my wife and I, right now - I'll tell you: the "middle class" is ALREADY living on "third world wages."”
The GOP was Right to Cheer Obama's Olympic Defeat

The GOP was Right to Cheer Obama's Olympic Defeat

Commented Oct 04, 2009 at 22:55:21 in Politics

“Derrion may have been striving to be like Obama, but he was in the wrong place at the wrong time and was killed.

We have to appeal to our children to strive instead of settling for a life of lack, drug use and crime.

We also have to protect our strivers and keep them safe. We failed with Derrion.”
huffingtonpost entry

Chicago, Obama, the Olympics, and the Murder of Derrion Albert

Commented Oct 02, 2009 at 17:01:49 in Chicago

“The implication is that hundreds of thousands of young brown inner city men should be scooped up and Guantanamoed.

That will not do. The (soon-to-be formerly) majority ignored and despised these people for decades and look at where it has gotten us (America).

When you have a collapsed society where it has gotten to the point the mothers and fathers cannot do their jobs as parents in any functional way, someone is going to have to be the mommies and daddies for the small and yet-impressionable, have jobs, education and re-education available to focus the not-yet felonious youth into more positive outcomes, and to remove the truly damaged souls from society proportional to the crimes committed and the willingness to reform.”

landr replied on Oct 02, 2009 at 18:45:31

“If having an Af.Am First Family doesn't give people hope, nothing will....If having a President give speech after speech about personal responsibility does nothing..M­aybe the parents should be Guantanamoed too, when their kids start killing other kids.. What would society have to do? Remove these kids from their teenage mothers at birth? That would be where it would have to start, realistically.”
huffingtonpost entry

Facebook's Obama Assassination Poll More Than a Sick Joke

Commented Sep 29, 2009 at 13:14:31 in Politics

“Anytime a president is threatened in such a way, it should be taken with the utmost of seriousness.

That Bush movie never had any real mainstream appeal, and I know of no pundit, much less a member of the national Democratic legislature, ever supporting such a film.

This "false equivalence" foolishness needs to go the way of the Dodo bird. It doesn't make it okay to wish death on another simply because they do not agree with your views.”
Desperately Seeking Snowe

Desperately Seeking Snowe

Commented Sep 24, 2009 at 20:02:13 in Politics

“I did not say that.

I am aware that you are battling a terminal illness, and med marijuana can at least help to relieve the junk that you have to go through...­for what's it worth, I empathize with you, guy.

Hey, I hope they legalize it for your sake...and if they don't...do what you have to do.”
next
1 - 25 of 78