HuffPost Social News

alumtrix's Comments (151)

View Comments:   Sort:
next
1 - 25 of 151
Sarah Palin Tells Rush Limbaugh the Magic Word

Sarah Palin Tells Rush Limbaugh the Magic Word

Commented Nov 17, 2009 at 19:50:00 in Politics

“With one we get hope and change (we can all wrap our hands around) and the other we get common sense. Go figure. Maybe the two of them can get together for a summit over some moose and beer just as long as Biden has nothing to do with driving them there.”
huffingtonpost entry

David Brooks on Palin: A Profile in Cowardice

Commented Nov 16, 2009 at 15:08:29 in Media

“Brooks' refrain from going public is that he saw a parallel career between Palin and Obama. How could he rightfully tear one down without writing the exact same thing about the other? And he probably thinks that Palin actually is more qualified than Obama based on accomplishments at that point in their careers. The world is starting to realize that Obama is a master at campaigning but pretty timid when it comes to making a decision.”

tonewheel replied on Nov 16, 2009 at 16:07:13

“We see an awful lot of supposition in your drivel.

(Sorry, alumtrix. That means opinion.)”

jimmyblantonlives replied on Nov 16, 2009 at 15:39:02

“You comparing Palin to Obama??? Sorry...not even close. Please list 1 accomplishment of Palin. Governor doesn't quite count since she quit.

waiting....

still waiting....”
huffingtonpost entry

Who Caused the End of the Cold War?

Commented Nov 15, 2009 at 14:21:35 in World

“You're analogy is spot on with the exception that the PLO came to light in the early-mid 70's and the shah of Iran was overthrown in the late 70's while Carter was in Office. Radical Islam hadbeen developing and growing for about a decade before the collapse of the Soviet Union.”
huffingtonpost entry

Who Caused the End of the Cold War?

Commented Nov 15, 2009 at 13:59:28 in World

“I find it comical that Prof Nye uses the word "liberal" in the Soviets awakening. They already had a liberal policy. Healthcare, Production, and other economic means were handled by the gov't before the collapse just like Obama wants today. What he wants to say but can't due to his ideology is that it was a conservative movement that led to free enterprise and the people owning the wealth.

I agree with him that it took both Reagan and his policies and Gorby and his policies to make it happen. They both fed off each other although neither was doing it intentionally.

If Obama was smart, he would start drilling in the US today and drive the price of oil down to drown the Middle East. Of course this will never happen.”

Etrusci replied on Nov 15, 2009 at 16:26:51

“Do you even know what the word "liberal" means?”
huffingtonpost entry

No, Rachel, No! This "Health Reform" Could Lose the Middle Class for Dems

Commented Nov 13, 2009 at 19:34:12 in Politics

“I just started watching her every now and then out of curiosity. It was right after Joe Wilson's "you lie" comment and all I heard Rachel scream was "you lie" in this high pitched shrill. I don't see her as being funny either”
huffingtonpost entry

Going Rogue: Gotcha!

Commented Nov 13, 2009 at 18:49:46 in Politics

“I've never understood the line of questioning about what she reads. I guess it's because my answer would be similar. I read what pops up on the internet regardless of who the source is.”

10cats4me replied on Nov 14, 2009 at 10:22:47

“She could have answered that questions a lot of ways differently than she did. Like

"I prefer non-fiction. I have been keeping up with the biography books about Republican politicians"
OR:
" I really enjoy reading about Ronald Reagan. His books have done a lot for me."

She doesn't like when anyone won't accept her obfusive answers.

Like Oprah and the Levi question about Thanksgiving dinner:
OPRAH: "Well, is that a yes or no about him coming?"”

TremoluxMan replied on Nov 13, 2009 at 21:50:34

“Oftentimes, a person and their outlook and philosophy is shaped by what they read. In data processing, we have an old saying, GIGO, or 'Garbage In, Garbage Out'. If you put faulty data in, you get faulty results out.
If a person feeds their mind on junk, or nothing at all, then what comes out is gibberish. That's why it it was an innocuous and legitimate question to ask what she reads. Knowing that, a questioner can get an idea of a person's perspective and world view. Further, what influences a person's thinking.
Palin, if she reads anything at all,could have cited many sources, from home-town papers to national publications. Yet, a simple question stumped her and caught her flat-footed. If something so basic had her flummoxed, how could legitimately be considered for the second highest office or potentially highest office in the country?
Evidently, she feeds her mind on nothing.”

blizb replied on Nov 13, 2009 at 20:16:34

“It was a standard question, when getting elected people are interested to know what education, what influences are part of a candidate's background.

The books and publication she reads may influence what kind of person she is and she couldn't answer a simple standard question regarding her own background as to what she reads.

Even is she answered "Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs" because I read it to my kids would have been a better answer than "all of 'em".

A person who SERIOUSLY wants to be considered for the highest office in the land should at the very least know how to answer a question regarding what she likes to read.”

Gidster replied on Nov 13, 2009 at 19:07:27

“Yet you are not the Governor of a state, running fro the office one heartbeat away from President.

Her knowledge or lack of it is relevant. Her claim that Gibson was arrogant and did not know about Alaska matters, was also irrelevant, she was attempting to enter the national stage, her knowledge or again obvious lack of it was relevant there as well.

Did we set the bar so low with GW Bush that Palin rates national office with no knowledge or interest in national affairs?”

sjones66 replied on Nov 13, 2009 at 19:03:07

“And so.... it's OK for the leader of the free world to do the same? Is there really an excuse for not knowing what one reads to stay informed? Sure, you might stumble upon things, but you have your daily sources. And if you don't, maybe that;s the problem.

Let's not forget that Sarah Palin said she didn't know anything about the war in Iraq because she was focused on state issues. What "leader" ,let alone citizen, chooses to remain uninformed about the war their country is currently engaged in?”
The First Ten Lies from <em>Going Rogue</em>

The First Ten Lies from Going Rogue

Commented Nov 13, 2009 at 18:27:24 in Books

“I think HP is trying to get all right leaning books to be listed on their own best seller list because they tend to take up most of the spots for all the others on the existing lists.”
The First Ten Lies from <em>Going Rogue</em>

The First Ten Lies from Going Rogue

Commented Nov 13, 2009 at 18:25:27 in Books

“Your piece reads more like an opinion piece rather than something based on fact. Sure there's a lot of he said-she said stuff you write about but ..........­.......but­, is that all you got?”

whiskeytangofred replied on Nov 13, 2009 at 19:52:13

“No, he clearly stated it's just the first 10 lies.....”
The First Ten Lies from <em>Going Rogue</em>

The First Ten Lies from Going Rogue

Commented Nov 13, 2009 at 18:21:34 in Books

“There's many a farmer in the Midwest that have never left their home-state but I bet you would think their story is as American as they get. I personally believe McCain was campaigning in a mode we will never see again. Something fully accepted up until this past election.Palin would have campaigned with a style much the same as Obama and his obviously was very successful.

2010 and 2012 will tell you all you need to know if it's the America YOU know and love or just the public getting hood-winked. (no pun intended)”
The First Ten Lies from <em>Going Rogue</em>

The First Ten Lies from Going Rogue

Commented Nov 13, 2009 at 18:12:18 in Books

“But nothing wrong with Biden declaring the stimulus plan has worked beyond his wildest dreams while Obama is claiming he's now created or saved over a million jobs. The difference between Obama and Palin is that one is making decisions currently that affect the entire US and the other is a traveling celeb.”

cutesky replied on Nov 13, 2009 at 23:39:53

“Alumtrix..how sad for you that you cannot or will not see that Sarah Palin is a traveling "snake oil" saleswoman, with no snake and no oil.”
Dud, Baby, Dud: The Lesson of Doug Hoffman

Dud, Baby, Dud: The Lesson of Doug Hoffman

Commented Nov 07, 2009 at 08:12:52 in New York

“Obama felt certain that the dems would carry NJ and VA so he was willing to campaign there. He wouldn't touch NY-23 since the repubs had held that district for 150 years. WHOOPS!”

roshni replied on Nov 08, 2009 at 15:12:47

“This post is about Rush and his false prediction on NY-23.
Nice try changing the subject.”
huffingtonpost entry

Dispelling the Myths Behind Columbus

Commented Oct 13, 2009 at 00:03:26 in Books

“If there were 65 million native deaths as a result of this discovery, I can already hear the left claiming there are 972 million people living in the U S without healthcare.”

Foreground replied on Oct 13, 2009 at 02:37:01

“Speaking as someone who is miles left of Obama (who himself is just barely a hair left of center), I prefer using numbers that are accurate. Such as about 50 million people in America w/o health care, out of around 300 million.

Also, I don't see how the point about 65 million deaths caused due to the European invasion of America (the worst era of which was started by Spain) leads into the Left somehow making up numbers at random, but as I'm not completely incompetent at debating, I might be at a bit of a disadvantage there, I guess.”
Obama's Nobel Honors His Dignitarian Politics

Obama's Nobel Honors His Dignitarian Politics

Commented Oct 09, 2009 at 16:21:18 in World

“If what you are saying/ proposing is true, then it is time to withdraw our troops from around the world. Specifically, in the areas of active war, then in areas where the natives despise us most and lastly from our alleys' shores. Everyone would beholden this new approach and have new found respect for us as a nation and peace will consume every corner of the globe.
Well, that is assuming the leaders from "over there" preach and practice this dignitarian approach to politics. These Nobel Awards, just like the movie and music industry awards, is no longer about what is good or the best. They are a reflection of the beliefs of those awarding the trophies. Pick a movie, a musical group, an actor/actress that is the most vocal when it comes to liberal politics and that is who will win the award. Try it, you'll be surprised.”
The Demonization of Barack Obama

The Demonization of Barack Obama

Commented Oct 08, 2009 at 00:49:30 in Politics

“Let's not forget that there has been an attempt on every president since Reagan.”

JMBrodie replied on Oct 08, 2009 at 05:50:15

“Go back farther. Every president: Carter, Ford, Johnson, um JFK..., Eisenhower, Truman, FDR...

You get the idea.

Again, the point is that such talk is a problem, whoever is in the White House.”
The Demonization of Barack Obama

The Demonization of Barack Obama

Commented Oct 08, 2009 at 00:45:54 in Politics

“guns are to liberals what abortions are to conservatives.


hidden secrets until discovered”

DaleR replied on Oct 08, 2009 at 01:07:52

“Really? I'm a liberal, have been all my life. I believe in a woman's right to choose and believe in the right to bear arms.”
All the President's Values

All the President's Values

Commented Sep 30, 2009 at 23:50:23 in Politics

“I initially thought Obama was choosing 2013 for HIS healthcare reform to become fully active because he knows the damage it will cause to the economy. His thinking is simply that if healthcare is in place, it's never leaving but he doesn't want to be around as the country goes deeper into debt.
But Drew made it occur to me that maybe the real reason of choosing 2013 is similar to an election during war. We typically keep the incumbent in office. Healthcare will be shut down or replaced if Obama is not in office until 2016 and that it will be his rally cry for re-election.

It looks pretty obvious that those who voted for Obama in search of "hope and change" are suffering from buyer's remorse. I'm glad Drew pointed out in clear terms the difference between W and O.”
huffingtonpost entry

Obama's Shrewd Iran Policy

Commented Sep 28, 2009 at 20:19:50 in Politics

“As I read this article, all I could say was wrong, wrong, and wrong. History will tell you how people will behave and respond to various threats. I think it was 17 UN sanctions and the world had no clue as to whether Saddam Hussein had WMD's. Thank God W came along and told the world he would handle it. Hussein has no possibilty of getting WMD's now. Case closed.
Now we're up to 2 or 3 or 4 UN sanctions against Iran and once again, we're depending on Russia and our allies to enforce these. The very same characters involved in the food for oil scandal that undermined the sanctions. Bush played it brilliantly. He didn't waste his time. He told Europe to handle it knowing full well that they would accomplish the same thing as anyone else. Just a waste of time. Obama is being played like a fiddle. Iran is buying all the time they need or want by getting the allies involved and acting like they are negotiating.”

DeWayne replied on Sep 28, 2009 at 21:16:58

“Iran is being played (exactly) like Iraq, Western-Empires had sold (all) of Saddam's WMD to him, today as then Western-Empires follow Pres-Obama and the Pentagon-Cabal (ie...Office of Special Plans) manufactured Intelligence to the letter.

How do you know when liars lie, it is when they open their mouth...

"We know where they are. They're in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat"....Donald Rumsfeld...ABC Interview...March 30, 2003

"If he declares he has none, then we will know that Saddam Hussein is once again misleading the world."...Ari Fleischer...Press Briefing...December 2, 2002

This (is) almost same steer excrement they used in Iraq, and now use on Iran.”

Car84 replied on Sep 28, 2009 at 21:11:09

“To clarify: Saddam Hussein DID have WMDs, and in fact used them against his own people. He DID have chemical and biological programs in place, as well as a latent nuclear program that had progressed at a stunning pace. The only real question out there (perhaps even in Saddam Hussein's mind) was when and whether the WMDs were disposed of.

But, yes ... where we are now? We are gearing up for a medley of UN sanctions and tut-tuts, assuming Russia - a country that has not seen the need to concede anything - will do any heavy lifting.

A few short months ago there was a perfect opportunity to support a fair election that would have installed a more agreeable government. Instead, Obama really liked the sparkle and shine of a partial recount (imagine that).”
huffingtonpost entry

Entrapping ACORN

Commented Sep 24, 2009 at 10:50:19 in Politics

“We all know who Acorn's target audience is. It has nothing to do with age, sex, race or ethnicity. It is strictly based on political alliance. If these poor people have the resources to find a way to an acorn office, they surely have the resources to get to a post office to register to vote.

We all know what targeting the poor to get into a house at the expense of government regulation has done to the economy. It does not work. It hurts the country as a whole.

Acorn is corrupt from top to bottom although there are a lot of people at the lower levels that have their heart in the right place. They are strictly paid pawns doing overt acts to make Acorn look good to the public. What is taking place down in the bowels of the organization wreaks with corruption and has for as many years as the organization has been around.”

tribalogical replied on Sep 29, 2009 at 06:26:27

“And sayin' it just makes it so, right?

Repeat it enough times, it becomes accepted as "truth", right?

"Acorn is corrupt from top to bottom..." you say. With no basis in FACT.

I've seen scam videos, with "suggested context" and creatively edited to support the suggestion, equally with no basis in reality or fact.

You sir, have been duped.

And that's a "Fact".....”

DrInsula replied on Sep 24, 2009 at 16:52:25

“Sigh...Once again, the CRA had NOTHING TO DO with the fact that banks were making absurd loans (too large, and on property that was artificially overappraised) to ANYONE WITH A PULSE was because INVESTORS with way too much money were beating down the doors at these banks & investment companies, DEMANDING more of these really hot financial instruments (mortgage-backed derivatives) that would make them fantastically wealthy- as long as they got out of the casino in time. PLEASE get some econ background before coming here and recycling the old toiletpaper talking point by conservatives, that the financial system somehow crashed because poor folks were able to buy homes.”

Jannsmoor replied on Sep 24, 2009 at 12:20:01

“You are obviously targeting the Community Reinvestment Act. Actually, statistics indicate houses bought under the CRA have no greater incidence of foreclosure than the housing market taken as a whole. If this is true, then your statement is merely an indication that you are intolerant of the notion of poor people owning their own home.

You should simply come out and say "poor people do not deserve a home." You show your ignorance of the facts and economics when you perpetuate the lie that the CRA has hurt the economy.”
Palin Foe Frozen Out of Auction When Identity Revealed

Palin Foe Frozen Out of Auction When Identity Revealed

Commented Sep 22, 2009 at 00:29:12 in Politics

“hmmmm.........”
huffingtonpost entry

Time to Get Real About the ACORN "Controversy"--and Republican Double Standards

Commented Sep 21, 2009 at 14:14:26 in Politics

“Wrong - 53 million is what Acorn has received since 93-94. 8 billion is what is allocated to go to various programs that Acorn has a hand in. So we know where the money is going although it does not say Acorn specifically.”

oldngrumpy replied on Sep 22, 2009 at 23:14:44

“The 8 billion also includes the US census, which is what Repugnuts are really getting their britches twisted over. Counting people in the inner city neighborhoods is tough unless one is part of the neighborhood. ACORN was a perfect fit for that part of the census and had enough national offices to handle it.

Republicans are afraid that a proper count of the populations of our cities will weight representation districts in a way that favors Democrats who do well in urban areas. I don't know what they have planned to skew the numbers, but you can bet they have something up their sleeves that will be 1) immoral or illegal or both, 2) and will discount the actual numbers of city dwellers. My guess is that they have some reich wing outfit that will play ball with them ready to manage the census.”

stateretiree replied on Sep 21, 2009 at 14:50:06

“Whats your source??”
huffingtonpost entry

Time to Get Real About the ACORN "Controversy"--and Republican Double Standards

Commented Sep 21, 2009 at 13:49:53 in Politics

“The problem I have with Acorn is the same problem I have with Al Sharpton (although I like him). They both have tunnel vision and will only help those that benefit them. Last week Al referred to a black woman that got mugged/ beat up by some white guys. Of course that was racially motivated. He failed to mention the white kid on the bus that got beat up by the blacks. ( no racial motivation of course).

Whatever happened to registration taking place at the post office? We have probably 25% of postal employees sitting around doing nothing yet getting paid at the tax payers expense already. Let them canvas the neighborhoods like they do as part of their job description.

And don't forget that there is roughly 8 billion dollars allocated to Acorn from the stimulus package.”

Lavina replied on Sep 21, 2009 at 15:37:07

“Do you work at post office? If not, how do you know this?”

MyNameIsJames replied on Sep 21, 2009 at 14:13:03

“Hold-on a minute. Just because a White kid gets beat up in a fight doesn't mean there was racism involved. Kids fight all the time for all sorts of reasons. Unless one can demonstrate that the motivation was race - why would people assume that it was racial?

I am not sure that the kid who got beaten up by a group of kids.”

jimspy replied on Sep 21, 2009 at 14:07:15

“And don't forget that there is roughly 8 billion dollars allocated to Acorn from the stimulus package.

FAIL. No monies are allocated to ACORN. $53 million is allocated to obtaining low-cost housing for the poor. ACORN is not mentioned in the allocation,”
With a Health Care Plan This Insane, Who Needs Wingnuts?

With a Health Care Plan This Insane, Who Needs Wingnuts?

Commented Sep 16, 2009 at 19:16:31 in Politics

“Maybe it's time for a panel of everyday citizens to write a bill for health care coverage. With the internet and other forms of media so easily accessible to all of us, it's not that far out of reach. Look what a pimp and a ho wannabe did to Acorn. Took them off the census bureau. All that's needed is a handful of accountants, doctors, and business people with lots of time on their hands. Get to work somebodies out there.”
Drudge, Limbaugh, and the Sad Return of

Drudge, Limbaugh, and the Sad Return of "Racial America"

Commented Sep 16, 2009 at 09:46:24 in Media

“I'm sure we will be hearing about racism for the next 3 plus years. If you disagree with Obama, you're a racist. It doesn't get any simpler than that.”

gloriousbeing replied on Sep 16, 2009 at 13:48:49

“SORE LOSER COMMENT....It doesn't get any simpler than that.”

MrMike513 replied on Sep 16, 2009 at 12:34:23

“It's not that simple, though. As with most conservatives, you fail to understand nuance. It is not rational disagreement that makes people racist. It is IRRATIONAL disagreement that makes these people racist. If you want to disagree with his policies on their merits, that's fine. But to make up crap like death panels, euthanasia, coverage for illegals, birth certificates, ACORN, he's muslim, etc. and that is a lame cover for your inability to accept a black man as your president. There is no other explanation. Even when the right was attacking Clinton with all their lies (Vince Foster's "murder", etc.), there was nowhere near the level of anger that we hear in the voices of these people.”

whiskeytangofoxtrot451 replied on Sep 16, 2009 at 12:20:13

“You know what would help quell the accusations of racism? If the people who disagree with him would stop calling him things like an "Indonesian Muslim turned welfare thug".

If you don't like being lumped in with racists, stop letting them be the ones who go TV to speak for you.”

pjburke replied on Sep 16, 2009 at 12:15:14


No. If you are predisposed to disagree with Obama simply because he's black, then you are a racist.

Most of those who are racists do not even recognize that they are... and many of those don't even agree that racism is morally wrong anyway. They have been raised to believe that all non-white people are inferior in every important sense, and will never accept the American doctrine that all people are created equal.

The doctrine which the white racists do accept is that society should instead be a structured hierarchy, with white people at the top getting all of the benefits which the rest of the darker-skinned serfs and peasants below them produce.

It ought not be such a surprise that the darker-skinned folks reject that model.”

Chubbster replied on Sep 16, 2009 at 12:09:55

“Time to get over Bush.”

fabucat replied on Sep 16, 2009 at 12:09:53

“Wrong. Plenty of sensible conservatives like Mike Gerson, Brooks, Frum and Kathleen Parker have been criticizing Obama cerebrally. I would not call them racist. I'd call them conservative. Glenn Beck, who has called health care reform "Back door reparations for blacks," even though it would help white people like me, is a racist, pure and simple. That's the difference.”

Chubbster replied on Sep 16, 2009 at 12:05:10

“You must remember that people who call you racist because you might disagree with President Obama have a very limited skill set and very shrunken brains.”

yellowdogdemocratic replied on Sep 16, 2009 at 11:45:28

“rush dimbaugh talks about black teens who beat up a white teen and then says that this is what we can expect from Obama's America, implying that the black teens beating up a white teen is was somehow directed by Obama, and you don't think racism is involved here? People pull their children out of school to keep them from hearing a back to school message from Obama, and you don't think racism was involved there? I've been very reluctant to believe that all this anger is caused by racism, thinking it was partisanship instead, but this weak I've changed my mind. I think the opposite of what you said is true. Right wing commentators are sturring up racial tensions and then condemning people for using the racism card when they are called out for what they are doing.”

skullman replied on Sep 16, 2009 at 11:45:04

“Name one person who ever said that if you disagree with Obama, you're a racist. Please cite a specific example. Thank you, I didn't think you could.”

kyleet12 replied on Sep 16, 2009 at 11:43:26

“You are being too simplistic. No one is saying that. What people are saying, is that if you dont like his policies, what does his race have to do with it. That is a ridiculous counterpoint. Conservatives are not telling the country what they would do to solve the country's problems because that is not what they do. They have had the opportunity to do so many times. Just saying no to policy decisions and calling people names is not what they got elected for.”

lesterbud replied on Sep 16, 2009 at 11:36:03

“"In case you missed it, the latest attack tactic deployed by conservatives is to play the race card by saying that liberals and Democrats are playing the race card--racial jiu-jitsu far too lame to work anywhere but in the echo chamber of conservative self-love."

Doesn't get any simpler than that.”
Drudge, Limbaugh, and the Sad Return of

Drudge, Limbaugh, and the Sad Return of "Racial America"

Commented Sep 16, 2009 at 09:08:22 in Media

“Will, you make a good argument except it can be said about any news organization regardless of the format. Jury picking, what a defendent wears to court, salespeople, magazine covers - they all apply the same concept - what sales best to the target audience.
Most of us would agree that most politicians are either in bed or involved with something/someone that lives in the grey zone. Sure they can take donations to get them re-elected but when all their votes cater to the donators' needs, it looks a little shady. We tend to accept that the Bush types will cater to the oil guys, Dodd and Frank to the banking and housing peeps and so on and so on. Those are business types that we accept. Obama's associations tend to be a little different. Rev. Wright, Bill Ayers, Van Jones. I could fill this entire column with names that if anyone else had these same associations, they would be called on it. You are the one who has elected to overlook it. Why is that? I believe it's the color of his skin. Obama is not getting treated any differently from the right than Bush was treated from the left. It's because we overlook his skin color and don't like the content of his character. If you are afraid to ask the same questions of a person of color that you would ask a white person, you're the one with the racial issues and not vice versa.”
Is the Age of Terror Over?

Is the Age of Terror Over?

Commented Sep 11, 2009 at 12:39:34 in World

“It wasn't that long ago that we prosecuted the blind sheik in NYC and we won the case. Mission Accomplished, I think. We have a handful of convicted terrorists sitting in our maximum super secure prison in Colorado and all is well. Well, that is until 9/11 burst onto the scene.
What was it?, 17 UN resolutions to not let Saddam Hussein acquire WMD's and it wasn't until his capture and death that the world knew for certain he would never acquire them. Bush -1, the UN - still scratching their collective chins. It takes resolve to get some things accomplished and thankfully we had someone in charge that had resolve.
NEXT!”

Blaster replied on Sep 11, 2009 at 13:12:21

“Really on August 6 2001 when the joint chiefs of staff had gotten a report a very creditable report
where was Bush Ignoring the warning 9/11 on Bushes call what a protector?­??????????”
next
1 - 25 of 151