anniegirl9's Comments (267)
Bush Deficit Hurting Obama: Reports
Commented Dec 10, 2009 at 18:37:59 in Politics
“Or we could look at things that have been proven to work and do away with those that waste our money, like AIDS relief $ that insist on abstinence only and demonizes condom use. Just one example among many.”
Merry Hyatt, Tea Party Patriot, Wants Mandatory Christmas Carols In Public Schools
Commented Dec 10, 2009 at 16:47:18 in Politics
“Um, isn't this the same group of people who screamed "indoctrination" just a little while ago.
Do they really know the meanings of these big words, or do they just repeat everything Fox and Limbaugh say?”
Do they really know the meanings of these big words, or do they just repeat everything Fox and Limbaugh say?”
lisakaz2 replied on Dec 10, 2009 at 16:57:45
“Yup. Obama reference as "indoctrin ation."”
Obama Wall St. Speech: Touts Reform On Lehman Anniversary (VIDEO)
Commented Sep 14, 2009 at 14:55:54 in Business
“I wish we could really learn from history for once. The right debates whether or not FDR’s New Deal got us out of the GD, but that ignores history even further back. The US was plagued with periods of economic turmoil since its creation. The GD was undoubtably the largest, and it was especially hurtful because it came after a period of great prosperity, but it certainly wasn’t the first. With the regulations of FDR, we enjoyed the longest spance of time without these large economic upheavals. But Republicans started to chip away at regulation almost immediately. They did not have good success until Regan. And low and behold, shortly there after, we had the S & L scandal. At this time, with the GD all but forgotten, deregulation penetrated even into Democratic ideas. More and more regulations were eliminated or not enforced. And now we have the greatest recession since the GD.
Many don’t like regulation because, arguably, companies don’t have the potential to capitalize on their profits as much as possible. The flip side of that is that we all do not suffer the consequences of their quick profit mentality nearly as often. The US needs to decide if we are going to go back and be a country with rollercoaster ups and downs in the race for the biggest profit margins or are we going to be a more – dare I say – “conservative” economy that looks to the future and the benefit of society in”
Many don’t like regulation because, arguably, companies don’t have the potential to capitalize on their profits as much as possible. The flip side of that is that we all do not suffer the consequences of their quick profit mentality nearly as often. The US needs to decide if we are going to go back and be a country with rollercoaster ups and downs in the race for the biggest profit margins or are we going to be a more – dare I say – “conservative” economy that looks to the future and the benefit of society in”
fequalma replied on Sep 14, 2009 at 15:17:17
“good points
The reason the right "debates" is to place doubt in the pig-ignorant minds of american imbeciles. The ND worked. period.
The wealthy do not suffer near the upheaval as the rest, and they benefit much more from the highs, so they actually WANT an environment of instant gratification. And the shift in policy since reagan is a direct reflection of the degree to which policy has been bought by the wealthy.
Today, policy is WRITTEN and implemented by the wealthy.”
The reason the right "debates" is to place doubt in the pig-ignorant minds of american imbeciles. The ND worked. period.
The wealthy do not suffer near the upheaval as the rest, and they benefit much more from the highs, so they actually WANT an environment of instant gratification. And the shift in policy since reagan is a direct reflection of the degree to which policy has been bought by the wealthy.
Today, policy is WRITTEN and implemented by the wealthy.”
Dowd On Wilson: "Some People Just Can't Believe A Black Man Is President And Will Never Accept It"
Commented Sep 13, 2009 at 16:12:45 in Politics
“Neither man would ever make it through a GOP primary. Neither would their man Steele. They like to have a few around to say, "see, some of my best friends are ..." but they would never dream of granting them real power.”
Dowd On Wilson: "Some People Just Can't Believe A Black Man Is President And Will Never Accept It"
Commented Sep 13, 2009 at 16:08:42 in Politics
“It's also ignorant of history. Before the US joined in WWII, there was actually quite a bit of support for Hitler among the conservative and economic giants of the time who despised labor unions and thought Hitler might just have the answer. Hitler even had a portrait of Henry Ford who helped finance some of Hitler's ambitions. And now the conservative and economic giants of our time are yielding the puppet strings to have the ignorant masses turn the finger on Obama and progressives and call us "Nazis." It would be funny if it wasn't so scarry.”
ABC Rejects Tea Party Organizers' Attendance Claims
Commented Sep 13, 2009 at 13:55:10 in Politics
“lol - huked on foniks wurked phor me.”
ABC Rejects Tea Party Organizers' Attendance Claims
Commented Sep 13, 2009 at 13:46:56 in Politics
“I had to laugh as I listened to one Republican strategist explaining that the rallies were "buyer's remorse." So many people were there saying "this wasn't the change we voted for."
Yeah, what percent of those protesters voted for Obama in the first place? I would wager to say 0, but I'm sure some of them were too confused by the ballots and accidentally voted wrong.
The truth is, Obama was exactly the change they didn't want, and never would want or accept, even if he succeeds in turning the economy around. It's all just a little too dark for them.”
Yeah, what percent of those protesters voted for Obama in the first place? I would wager to say 0, but I'm sure some of them were too confused by the ballots and accidentally voted wrong.
The truth is, Obama was exactly the change they didn't want, and never would want or accept, even if he succeeds in turning the economy around. It's all just a little too dark for them.”
dnegri replied on Sep 13, 2009 at 14:20:29
“How can you have "buyer's remorse" when you never bought the thing in the first place?
Talk about stupid.”
Talk about stupid.”
LunaPark replied on Sep 13, 2009 at 14:19:54
“I was on board with Obama, donated money etc... Then he voted in support for the revised FISA bill. I had remorse that I gave him anything at all at that point.”
Sarah Palin Ebay Dinner Offered -- With Disclaimers
Commented Sep 11, 2009 at 11:21:37 in Politics
“I guess that means Oberman's bid gets rejected.”
Mike Duvall: Recorded Sex Comments Cost California GOP Lawmaker His Job
Commented Sep 11, 2009 at 11:10:21 in Politics
“Let's just humor him and say I believe it was "story telling."
I still have the following ?'s.
So is sharing creepy sexual fantasies with your fellow college as if it really happened a new Republican hobby?
Do they sit and compare imaginary, potentially illegal sexual exploits as if they were high school virgins trying to one up each other?
And can we just eliminate "family values" and "campasionate conservative" from our vocabulary now?”
I still have the following ?'s.
So is sharing creepy sexual fantasies with your fellow college as if it really happened a new Republican hobby?
Do they sit and compare imaginary, potentially illegal sexual exploits as if they were high school virgins trying to one up each other?
And can we just eliminate "family values" and "campasionate conservative" from our vocabulary now?”
tbone99 replied on Sep 11, 2009 at 12:06:43
“and do they high five each other for breaking the law?”
Progressive Obama Backers Take Out Full Page NYT Ad Targeting President
Commented Sep 09, 2009 at 16:08:28 in Politics
“As I said before, you are right. I will not vote Repub, BUT if Obama fails to fight for what he promissed us, what so many of us got excitted about, we will not turn out to canvas neighborhoods, volunteer at phone banks, or give $. I worked in a group of nearly 3 dozen people where only two had ever volunteered to a campaign before. It was Obama's message that moved us, and without the fight begind it, I know I will not be moved again. To lose his grassroots support could be the same as if we didn't vote for him. That is wht you are failing to grasp.”
suzukimom replied on Sep 09, 2009 at 16:39:44
“I agree with you. I also donated money, traveled to a battleground state to canvas and register voters and phone-banked. My 18 year old son joined in that effort. Obama and the Dems can forget about that kind of support from me and probably my son if we don't get a decent public option for all Americans. They may think that they will have our allegiance even if they screw us, but they are wrong. We are not stupid. I may not even vote Dem.”
zipowitz replied on Sep 09, 2009 at 16:21:32
“I agree with what you are saying but when push comes to shove and he is going for another 4 years, I believe most will capitulate and vote for him. Not all, just most. I think they hate the alternative so much that it would drive them to it.”
Progressive Obama Backers Take Out Full Page NYT Ad Targeting President
Commented Sep 09, 2009 at 16:01:52 in Politics
“I might agree with you if the PO was not so pivotal to the other parts of this bill working. So far there have been insurance reform parts: eliminating pre-existing conditions, making coverage portable.. . which have for the most part avoided criticism. If this was all that we could hope to get passed, I would be up to saying lets do it and we can build on it. But, as I have mentioned before, insurance supporters have already installed into the bill some provision that would help counter those loss of profits.
Still, it is the other areas that define it for me. The main one is the employer mandates. With a Public Option, the bill would cover many more people. The millions of uninsured are one of the most compelling arguments for Heath Care Reform. Without the PO, this leg of the legislation turns into a win for the insurance company or a loss for employers and workers. The PO is the third leg of a tripod. Without it, the legislation falls. It becomes more harmful than helpful, so the idea of passing something we can build off of later loses its appeal.”
Still, it is the other areas that define it for me. The main one is the employer mandates. With a Public Option, the bill would cover many more people. The millions of uninsured are one of the most compelling arguments for Heath Care Reform. Without the PO, this leg of the legislation turns into a win for the insurance company or a loss for employers and workers. The PO is the third leg of a tripod. Without it, the legislation falls. It becomes more harmful than helpful, so the idea of passing something we can build off of later loses its appeal.”
Progressive Obama Backers Take Out Full Page NYT Ad Targeting President
Commented Sep 09, 2009 at 16:00:12 in Politics
“It is precissly because he is starting to lose Progressives that his numbers are going South. If he can enact strong helath care reform, they will go up again. If not, he may well be a one term president.”
zipowitz replied on Sep 09, 2009 at 16:01:47
“Do you really think a progressive would vote for anybody but a D?”
Progressive Obama Backers Take Out Full Page NYT Ad Targeting President
Commented Sep 09, 2009 at 15:37:22 in Politics
“Even if we vote Obama 2012, without us fighting for him, going door to door, making calls, and sending in $ everytime we can spare it, with his approval ratings going down, I forsee a grim November for Dems. The Repubs were right about something after all. This may be Obamas Waterloo, but only if he buys into it and thinks that passing anything he can call a Health Care bill will save him.”
Progressive Obama Backers Take Out Full Page NYT Ad Targeting President
Commented Sep 09, 2009 at 15:28:31 in Politics
“There is also an amendment in the senate version that allows the insurance companies to increase the patient burden from a max of 25% to 35%, placing even more of the cost onto us, making up for the provisions which are sure to make it through like eliminating pre-existing conditions.
The majority of bankrupcys in the US are due to medical bils.
The majority of those are individuals who HAVE medical insurance.
The system is broken. Leaving out the PO only increases that, and I hope House REps keep their word and kill it if it desn't have the PO.”
The majority of bankrupcys in the US are due to medical bils.
The majority of those are individuals who HAVE medical insurance.
The system is broken. Leaving out the PO only increases that, and I hope House REps keep their word and kill it if it desn't have the PO.”
wildedge replied on Sep 09, 2009 at 15:33:21
“Thank you for getting my point and for adding that information. We do have some progresive Representatives, and it may be up to them to stop this from turning into a nightmare.”
Progressive Obama Backers Take Out Full Page NYT Ad Targeting President
Commented Sep 09, 2009 at 15:20:52 in Politics
“I would prefer single payer, but Obama didn't campaign on that. He never endorsed it, so I can't be too hard on him for not including it. He did however campaign on the Public Option. Now I expect him to fight for it now.”
Progressive Obama Backers Take Out Full Page NYT Ad Targeting President
Commented Sep 09, 2009 at 15:02:45 in Politics
“A bad bill is worse than no bill. If the bill were to pass as it stands in all 3 versions in the House but without the PO, it would include mandates for employers to provide insurance. Without the PO, this only serves to strengthen the insurance companies, giving them more customers and not capping prices in anyway. Employers forced to cover more employees may pass that cost on to the employees with higher premiums or lay off workers to cover those left behind. The bill only works if it includes the PO to keep the prices in check.
Not to mention, an amendment in the Senate allows the insurance companies to increase patient responsibility costs from 25% to 35%. Essentially, this could be an insurance aid bill and not a health care reform bill if it does not include the PO.”
Not to mention, an amendment in the Senate allows the insurance companies to increase patient responsibility costs from 25% to 35%. Essentially, this could be an insurance aid bill and not a health care reform bill if it does not include the PO.”
juhar replied on Sep 09, 2009 at 15:25:41
“It would be a bad bill without the public option. If this bad bill with a mandated new 40+ millions buying insurance and insurance companies use loopholes to make large profits while the citizenry is feeling the full effects of the recession. Not only is President Obama a one-term president, but the Democratic Party will not survive.”
Progressive Obama Backers Take Out Full Page NYT Ad Targeting President
Commented Sep 09, 2009 at 14:37:40 in Politics
“You're right. I knew Obama was no progressive when I worked to get him elected. The whole "he's the most liberal senator" stuff was crap to scare the far Right and I knew it. But this was something he campaigned on to gain the support of progressives, and they have every right to hold him to it now.
I’m not saying he will lose my vote. But he will certainly lose my confidence, and without that, I will not be volunteering my time or my money to help him in 2012. I don’t mean that to sound like a threat. I’m just being honest. Obama infused excitement and hope in us. He electrified us. I would not change my vote last November, but if Obama fails to fight for the things he mobilized us to fight for, he won’t be able to excite us enough in 2012 to do any more than show up and vote.
As for the moderates, they should be able to accept that this was a key part of Obama's platform and, if they voted for him, then they have no reason to be upset if he fights for it.”
I’m not saying he will lose my vote. But he will certainly lose my confidence, and without that, I will not be volunteering my time or my money to help him in 2012. I don’t mean that to sound like a threat. I’m just being honest. Obama infused excitement and hope in us. He electrified us. I would not change my vote last November, but if Obama fails to fight for the things he mobilized us to fight for, he won’t be able to excite us enough in 2012 to do any more than show up and vote.
As for the moderates, they should be able to accept that this was a key part of Obama's platform and, if they voted for him, then they have no reason to be upset if he fights for it.”
Awake-and-Sing replied on Sep 09, 2009 at 14:54:11
“If the President had the character and courage to bring single-payer advocates to the table, then the blue dogs would be begging for the public option as a compromise.
This is what happens when you have a weak "leader" who gives away everything to the enemy before negotiations even start.”
This is what happens when you have a weak "leader" who gives away everything to the enemy before negotiations even start.”
Progressive Obama Backers Take Out Full Page NYT Ad Targeting President
Commented Sep 09, 2009 at 14:04:53 in Politics
“How is stating facts "revising history?" Now, I will allow you your opinion on the reason for the turn around or that it could not be carried on, even if I disagree with them, but facts are facts. Clinton left office with a surplus. It is an easily verifiable part of record. Historic revisionism happens when we alter those facts.”
zipowitz replied on Sep 09, 2009 at 14:59:14
“We could go on and on about history, Y2K, 9/11 and the devastating loss of revenues from that etc. however most here just want to blame Bush for everything and elevate Clinton to a throne he doesn't deserve. Besides that Clinton had both houses controlled by R's so that is where the policies are made and budgets. Congrats to them, not Clinton.
So yes, he did run a surplus and technically you are correct, my point was that Bush could not carry that on no matter what he did as he came into a recession as you will note.”
So yes, he did run a surplus and technically you are correct, my point was that Bush could not carry that on no matter what he did as he came into a recession as you will note.”
Progressive Obama Backers Take Out Full Page NYT Ad Targeting President
Commented Sep 09, 2009 at 13:45:20 in Politics
“The National Debt and the annual deficit/surplus are two different things. No one could expect Clinton to eliminate the National Debt which accrued during the Star Wars era of Regan, but an annual intake which is larger than the annual expenses (i.e. a surplus) was in fact what Clinton left in Bush's hands. Had Bush been able to carry on the Clinton trend, he would have cut the National Debt. Instead he ballooned it with the Iraq War and, in the minds of many, we no longer have the $ to pay for a Public Option. Although, I suspect the Right would have proclaimed that we didn't have the $ even if we did not have the debt of the Iraq War on our hands.”
zipowitz replied on Sep 09, 2009 at 13:54:24
“Unfortunately the Y2K balloon busted and goodbye tax revenues. Sure you will want to revise history but that was really another false economy that COULD NOT be carried on no matter what.”
Progressive Obama Backers Take Out Full Page NYT Ad Targeting President
Commented Sep 09, 2009 at 13:31:03 in Politics
“You are assuming it will pass with a "trigger." What, by the way, would those triggers be? Nothing has been defined, making it very had to support. But more telling is the lack of any other Repubs or Blue Dogs willing to say they will support a "trigger" option.
Do you really believe that those fighting so hard to defeat something would be open to the possibility of it in the future? Either they will fight it right off if Dems show support, or they will make sure the triggers are so ambiguous, they could never be meet.”
Do you really believe that those fighting so hard to defeat something would be open to the possibility of it in the future? Either they will fight it right off if Dems show support, or they will make sure the triggers are so ambiguous, they could never be meet.”
Dale Larson replied on Sep 09, 2009 at 13:34:17
“Triggers are a sign of negotiating weakness.”
Progressive Obama Backers Take Out Full Page NYT Ad Targeting President
Commented Sep 09, 2009 at 12:52:33 in Politics
“It's true. As a self proclaimed Progressive, I am having a hard time with this. The idealist in me says if Obama doesn't come out strong for the Public Option, he will lose my suport. The pragmatist in me says if we do that, we will end up with a Republican in 2012.”
bilmardre replied on Sep 09, 2009 at 13:03:54
“If Congress gives Obama a bill with a strong public option he will sign it into law.
If Obama comes out strong for a public option and blue dogs deny him that the media will declare Obama a lame duck 8 months into his Presidency, and progressives will get nothing.”
If Obama comes out strong for a public option and blue dogs deny him that the media will declare Obama a lame duck 8 months into his Presidency, and progressives will get nothing.”
Progressive Obama Backers Take Out Full Page NYT Ad Targeting President
Commented Sep 09, 2009 at 12:46:38 in Politics
“Can't we at least call their bluff? With one of the highest rates of poverty and uninsured, Texas would become a third world country overnight. If I didn't have such a bleading heart for the children, I would be happy to say Adios to them.”
Progressive Obama Backers Take Out Full Page NYT Ad Targeting President
Commented Sep 09, 2009 at 11:31:03 in Politics
“During the campaign when things started to look bleak, I would go to my "happy place" by watching "The American President. " Now I find myself once again replaying the scene where President Shepard declares a scrapping of the crime bill that has no hopes of fighting crime and stand up to not just "fight the fight that we can win" but to "fight the fights that NEED fighting."
Is it too much to hope for that Obama will display a Shepard like moment in his address to the joint session and declare that the public option is not optional and he will fight for it to the end?”
Is it too much to hope for that Obama will display a Shepard like moment in his address to the joint session and declare that the public option is not optional and he will fight for it to the end?”
liveinhope23 replied on Sep 09, 2009 at 12:08:28
“Yes - it is.”
Progressive Obama Backers Take Out Full Page NYT Ad Targeting President
Commented Sep 09, 2009 at 11:18:37 in Politics
“That is like saying that you can't expect the parent to express thier values because in the end, it's only the teenager who can make the decissions.
Look, stop appoligizing for Obama. I went door to door for him. I made phone calls for him. I gave $ when I had little to spare. I still would given the choice between McCain and Obama, but if we don't hold his feet to the fire on the promises he made, who will? I still want to believe that O will come through, but I for one am adding my voice to those who say it's time to step up to the line Mr. President and fight for what we elected you to fight for.”
Look, stop appoligizing for Obama. I went door to door for him. I made phone calls for him. I gave $ when I had little to spare. I still would given the choice between McCain and Obama, but if we don't hold his feet to the fire on the promises he made, who will? I still want to believe that O will come through, but I for one am adding my voice to those who say it's time to step up to the line Mr. President and fight for what we elected you to fight for.”
Opposing Obama's School Speech Isn't Partisan -- It's Just Crazy
Commented Sep 09, 2009 at 10:25:43 in Media
“Not to mention, your quote states that the "lesson materials" were altered --- not the speech!”


