camipco's Comments (189)
"Avatar" And Religion: Jonah Goldberg's Take
Commented Dec 30, 2009 at 15:45:19 in Media
“The Na'vi didn't seem really religious to me. I mean, they believe in living in harmony with nature. But since they life in the middle of the forest, that's just sensible. Humans who live very close to nature consider it to be very important and treat it with respect not because of some spiritual motivation, but because people who don't treat it with respect die quickly.
As for the worship of the tree, I wouldn't call that religious either. The tree really does contain their ancestors, they can talk to them. It really does (spoiler) move the guy's spirit at the end and all the animals to protect it.
In short, the Na'vi are just being practical in their beliefs.”
As for the worship of the tree, I wouldn't call that religious either. The tree really does contain their ancestors, they can talk to them. It really does (spoiler) move the guy's spirit at the end and all the animals to protect it.
In short, the Na'vi are just being practical in their beliefs.”
79.9 Percent Interest Credit Card From First Premier Bank Skirts New Regulations
Commented Dec 18, 2009 at 23:31:30 in Business
“I think one motivation of the bill is that these fees are often unexpected and hidden. A 79.9% interest rate is, at least, transparent and easily comparable by consumers to other options.”
Gibbs: Obama Demanded As Much From Lieberman As Progressives
Commented Dec 17, 2009 at 10:27:13 in Politics
“Yeah, see this is the problem. Obama isn't just a neutral ref we elected to make sure legislation is halfway between left and right. He's supposed to be a progressive, pushing for the public option that he ran on and people voted for.”
greejambri replied on Dec 17, 2009 at 11:09:36
“obama is no progressive. he campaigned as if he were, but his true inclinations have since come out.”
Prince Charles Accused Of Meddling In Government
Commented Dec 17, 2009 at 10:22:15 in World
“The monarchy is surprisingly functional. It's nice to have certain powers vested outside of the chief executive in a figurehead who doesn't have the legitimacy to use them. Also, all that ribbon cutting frees up the PM's time.”
Expanded Health Care Coverage? Rumors Are Greatly Exaggerated, Unless Paying Fines Is Now 'Health Care'
Commented Dec 17, 2009 at 02:16:15 in Politics
“It's subsidized. The 30 million figure is based on the idea that, due to subsidies and regulation preventing insurance companies from excluding people, more people will be able to buy insurance than before.
So yes, the Obama dems are being a little spin-happy by claiming these people will just become covered. But you are also (one assumes intentionally) presenting a very warped version of the facts. The bill does not just contain an individual mandate. It also contains a huge amount of money to help those people pay, based on their need, for the coverage.”
So yes, the Obama dems are being a little spin-happy by claiming these people will just become covered. But you are also (one assumes intentionally) presenting a very warped version of the facts. The bill does not just contain an individual mandate. It also contains a huge amount of money to help those people pay, based on their need, for the coverage.”
dizmo4 replied on Dec 17, 2009 at 02:22:38
“I think the problem Progressives have with this bill is that the money goes to insurance companies. The impression I have is that progressives would rather see insurance companies punished than the 30 million or so people get insurance.
This is more anti-corporation than pro-health care.”
This is more anti-corporation than pro-health care.”
antaeus replied on Dec 17, 2009 at 02:21:50
“Money that is forced from our pockets through taxes and then given--by law--to private insurance companies who become even richer. "Subsidy" isn't a magic word that means free. It's another tax-supported give-away to the rich.”
Health Care Reform: Sifting Through the Suboptimal Solutions
Commented Dec 12, 2009 at 11:37:58 in Politics
“The characters in twilight change frequently? That's a strange choice of analogy. I felt that, for 5 books, there were really few, and consistent characters.”
Santorum Mulling Presidential Bid, Says Palin Will 'Have To Do Some Explaining If She Runs'
Commented Dec 07, 2009 at 17:42:18 in Politics
“Frothy.
Mix.”
Mix.”
CDMelty replied on Dec 07, 2009 at 17:52:37
“lol. I can't imagine the phrase President Santorum any better than President Sheetstain. *shivers*”
A Tale of Two Obamas
Commented Dec 07, 2009 at 07:08:00 in Politics
“Great, then we'll have 100 people working for so little money they can't afford to house and feed themselves, let alone get health care or buy anything that will stimulate the economy.
By your logic, Obama could pay every unemployed person 1cent tomorrow and claim there's no unemployment anymore. It's only significant if people have jobs if those jobs allow them to support their families and contribute to the economy. Well-paid workers buy things, which in turn creates more jobs. Well-paid workers create social stability and a health economy. Hiring people for $0.10 an hour creates third-world slums. That might in some statistical sense solve the jobs problem. But it wouldn't create an American economy anyone would be proud of.”
By your logic, Obama could pay every unemployed person 1cent tomorrow and claim there's no unemployment anymore. It's only significant if people have jobs if those jobs allow them to support their families and contribute to the economy. Well-paid workers buy things, which in turn creates more jobs. Well-paid workers create social stability and a health economy. Hiring people for $0.10 an hour creates third-world slums. That might in some statistical sense solve the jobs problem. But it wouldn't create an American economy anyone would be proud of.”
Dreamwalker420 replied on Dec 08, 2009 at 04:05:25
“In reality, the lower cost of wages means that prices would DEFLATE to realistic levels. A "well-paid" worker at $8.40 per hour while Gold is $1150 per ounce versus the "well-paid" worker for $0.25 when Gold was $20.00 an ounce.
1940 Minimum wage 1:80
2009 Minimum wage 1:137
You've lost 50% of that "well-paid" workers salary getting a higher price for him. Good job, keep making the poor poor ... and they love you for it, and you can sleep better at night, right?
Try telling them the truth. Good pay is reflective of the economic impact of those wages. In a generation of systemic stupidity we've lowered the purchasing power of the minium wage and thusly lowered their standard of living.”
1940 Minimum wage 1:80
2009 Minimum wage 1:137
You've lost 50% of that "well-paid" workers salary getting a higher price for him. Good job, keep making the poor poor ... and they love you for it, and you can sleep better at night, right?
Try telling them the truth. Good pay is reflective of the economic impact of those wages. In a generation of systemic stupidity we've lowered the purchasing power of the minium wage and thusly lowered their standard of living.”
GOP Would Require President, Cabinet, Staff To Enroll In Public Option
Commented Dec 07, 2009 at 01:54:53 in Politics
“I have a better idea. How about offering all Americans the same health care plan that members of congress award themselves?”
Eris23Skidoo replied on Dec 07, 2009 at 03:36:46
“Oh the republicans would never go for that. Sorry. That would be "socialism" for the people. In this country we only have socialism for the well-connected and the corporate whores.”
Chavez Spurs Fears Of Venezuelan Banking Meltdown
Commented Dec 05, 2009 at 01:39:38 in World
“"stoking fears that president Hugo Chávez could nationalize the banking system."
Isn't nationalizing banks exactly what the FDIC is doing almost every week in America to hold our banking system together?”
Isn't nationalizing banks exactly what the FDIC is doing almost every week in America to hold our banking system together?”
hypnotoad72 replied on Dec 05, 2009 at 09:03:41
“Yup”
OpposingViewpoint replied on Dec 05, 2009 at 01:43:41
“No way Hugo, stop trying to get in our game. Only is the US can you have too-big-to-fail banks. You have been w@arned.”
Party Crashers Today Show Appearance: 'The Truth Will Come Out'
Commented Dec 01, 2009 at 14:38:26 in Politics
“Tareq Salahi is an Arab.”
KKK Rally At Ole Miss: Klan Outnumbered By Protesters (PHOTOS, VIDEOS)
Commented Nov 21, 2009 at 17:53:06 in Sports
“Hey larper, your skirt clashes with you jackboots.
Most embarrassing terrorist uniform ever.”
Most embarrassing terrorist uniform ever.”
mark12345 replied on Nov 21, 2009 at 18:08:01
“And the color scheme is totally ripoff Pan African.”
Compromise Reached On Health Care Bill: Anti-Abortion Amendment To Be Given Floor Vote
Commented Nov 07, 2009 at 05:22:50 in Politics
“The power to provide for the general welfare is delegated to the United States by the Constitution.
Article 1,8,1
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States.
Also
Article 1,8,18
To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers
The US has had federal government provided healthcare since at least 1930 (the VA) and Medicare since 1965. Those haven't been ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, and they are both far more federally controlled than the voluntary public option the current bill proposes.
So, yeah, you don't have a clue what you're talking about.”
Article 1,8,1
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States.
Also
Article 1,8,18
To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers
The US has had federal government provided healthcare since at least 1930 (the VA) and Medicare since 1965. Those haven't been ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, and they are both far more federally controlled than the voluntary public option the current bill proposes.
So, yeah, you don't have a clue what you're talking about.”
UpFromLiberalism replied on Nov 07, 2009 at 06:39:42
“general Welfare is not federal controlled health care...unl ess you are a liberal
To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers...b ut not if they were not delegated to the United States by the Constitution.
The US has had federal government provided healthcare since at least 1930 (the VA) and Medicare since 1965. Those haven't been ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, and they are both far more federally controlled than the voluntary public option the current bill proposes.. .
Medicare is unconstitutional, just because "Those haven't been ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court" does NOT mean they are NOT in violation of the 10th amendment.
"...volunt ary public option the current bill proposes.. ." VOLUNTARY? peloci's bill will fine and possibly jail you if you don't participate.
So, yeah, you don't have a clue what you're talking about.”
To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers...b
The US has had federal government provided healthcare since at least 1930 (the VA) and Medicare since 1965. Those haven't been ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, and they are both far more federally controlled than the voluntary public option the current bill proposes..
Medicare is unconstitutional, just because "Those haven't been ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court" does NOT mean they are NOT in violation of the 10th amendment.
"...volunt
So, yeah, you don't have a clue what you're talking about.”
Compromise Reached On Health Care Bill: Anti-Abortion Amendment To Be Given Floor Vote
Commented Nov 07, 2009 at 05:13:55 in Politics
“What's happened is that the people that used to be moderate republicans have joined the democratic party.”
Compromise Reached On Health Care Bill: Anti-Abortion Amendment To Be Given Floor Vote
Commented Nov 07, 2009 at 05:12:46 in Politics
“What you're conveniently leaving out is that $15,000 will be subsidized for low-income families.”
VirginiaCarolina replied on Nov 07, 2009 at 06:05:51
“Another entitlement to further burden the middle class and reduce their standard of living. If you can't afford medical insurance for your children then you should not have had children. This will only encourage the poor to have more children to burden the working middle class.”
Plain Sight Corruption: Senator Burr and Rape Victims
Commented Nov 05, 2009 at 04:44:29 in Politics
“The rapists are subject to criminal law, the arbitration doesn't change that. Normally the victim would (in addition to any criminal charges against the rapists) be able to sue the company for the actions of their employees, for putting her in an unsafe situation, for not responding to her complaints of sexual harassment, for horrific botching the post-rape care, and so forth. This legal right is what's being denied.
In this particular case, however, KBR "lost" the rape kit for two years, and when they "found" it again it was missing crucial evidence, making her criminal case near impossible. They also locked her in a crate under armed guard and refused her access to her family, a lawyer, food, water, or medical care, despite the fact she had just been raped so brutally she required reconstructive surgery.
Personally, I think KBR should be criminally charged for accessory to rape, kidnapping, and tampering with evidence in this case. This isn't just an insufficiently protected work environment, KBR actively endorsed and encouraged the rape by their actions in the aftermath. KBR has also trafficked in human beings. This company needs to be shut down and it's directors need to go to jail.”
In this particular case, however, KBR "lost" the rape kit for two years, and when they "found" it again it was missing crucial evidence, making her criminal case near impossible. They also locked her in a crate under armed guard and refused her access to her family, a lawyer, food, water, or medical care, despite the fact she had just been raped so brutally she required reconstructive surgery.
Personally, I think KBR should be criminally charged for accessory to rape, kidnapping, and tampering with evidence in this case. This isn't just an insufficiently protected work environment, KBR actively endorsed and encouraged the rape by their actions in the aftermath. KBR has also trafficked in human beings. This company needs to be shut down and it's directors need to go to jail.”
Balzac replied on Nov 05, 2009 at 14:35:37
“I agree. Who are the people responsible for this cover-up? People need to be investigating and whistle-blowers inside need to be offered amnesty for delivering the goods on the key players in the decision to deny this young woman her civil rights and dignity after she was raped.”
bobwalters replied on Nov 05, 2009 at 11:49:49
“Your prescription for punishment of KBR and its directors is apt -- especially in view of the fact that corporations, according to SCOTUS and case law, enjoy all the rights of "personhood". So far, however, they have managed to avoid, thru bizarre interpretations of law (limited/no liability for directors, shareholders and managers via the "corporate veil"), any of the responsibilities and/or liabilities of personhood. Insertion of mandatory arbitration clauses into contracts is simply an extension of that avoidance. (Read any of your credit card notices lately, announcing escalation of their interest rate and other fees, due to these "challenging economic environments?" They contain a mandatory arbitration clause in case of ANY dispute, and constitute enforceable contracts. )
What's needed, in addition to prosecuting the specific case with KBR, is legislation: a) creating public financing of election campaigns; b) revoking corporate "personhood"; c) imposing a limit of one or two years on the duration of corporate charters, and requiring applications for charters/renewal of charters to demonstrate, by clear and convincing evidence, that the corporation serves a useful and beneficent PUBLIC purpose -- not just that it provides jobs and makes money; and d) a Constitutional Amendment to forever bar a corporation from being granted "personhood" and thereby claiming the rights and privileges of a human person.”
What's needed, in addition to prosecuting the specific case with KBR, is legislation: a) creating public financing of election campaigns; b) revoking corporate "personhood"; c) imposing a limit of one or two years on the duration of corporate charters, and requiring applications for charters/renewal of charters to demonstrate, by clear and convincing evidence, that the corporation serves a useful and beneficent PUBLIC purpose -- not just that it provides jobs and makes money; and d) a Constitutional Amendment to forever bar a corporation from being granted "personhood" and thereby claiming the rights and privileges of a human person.”
Plain Sight Corruption: Senator Burr and Rape Victims
Commented Nov 05, 2009 at 04:25:58 in Politics
“I'm not sure I buy the argument that distrust is reason enough. If 52% of Americans believed that a senator being a woman hurt her judgment, the correct response is not to get rid of female senators, it is to educate the public.
In addition, without further evidence, I don't think it's clear cut that the money influenced Burr's vote. Isn't it also possible that Burr is a true believer in this extremist ideology? Because he's a true believer, the contributers fund his campaigns, which help him stay in office despite taking unpopular positions?
I think few people want their senators to just watch the polls and vote with their constituents regardless of their own judgement. We chose senators to some extent because we trust them to make the right decisions based on a more thorough understanding of the issues than us.
Imagine this the other way around. What if Senator Franken's constituents were polled and said they were against the Senate meddling in the contract process, but Franken pushed the amendment anyway, because it's the right thing to do? Because they know he's strong on womens' issues like this one, Franken gets lots of contributions from NOW and similar groups. Is this an equally bad scenario? Why not?
I'm just exploring the argument here. I certainly agree that Burr's vote was disgusting, that money is a corrupting influence, and I support public financing.”
In addition, without further evidence, I don't think it's clear cut that the money influenced Burr's vote. Isn't it also possible that Burr is a true believer in this extremist ideology? Because he's a true believer, the contributers fund his campaigns, which help him stay in office despite taking unpopular positions?
I think few people want their senators to just watch the polls and vote with their constituents regardless of their own judgement. We chose senators to some extent because we trust them to make the right decisions based on a more thorough understanding of the issues than us.
Imagine this the other way around. What if Senator Franken's constituents were polled and said they were against the Senate meddling in the contract process, but Franken pushed the amendment anyway, because it's the right thing to do? Because they know he's strong on womens' issues like this one, Franken gets lots of contributions from NOW and similar groups. Is this an equally bad scenario? Why not?
I'm just exploring the argument here. I certainly agree that Burr's vote was disgusting, that money is a corrupting influence, and I support public financing.”
Rogan replied on Nov 05, 2009 at 05:57:22
“Unfortunately, we can't really look at this, as you say, "the other way around," because it didn't work that way, and it never will.
You'll never ever run a poll that finds a majority of any group of people were or are against that "Franken amendment. " It won't happen.”
You'll never ever run a poll that finds a majority of any group of people were or are against that "Franken amendment.
Clarence Thomas To Other Supreme Court Justices: Be Quiet
Commented Oct 24, 2009 at 02:54:49 in Politics
“I think Thomas has a point here. Often, attorneys don't get to make the crucial points of their case because of the line of questioning. It might be better if there was a set time (say ten minutes) for an uninterrupted argument, followed by questions from the justices.
Don't underestimate Thomas. He's a whole lot smarter than the vast majority of people that share his politics.”
Don't underestimate Thomas. He's a whole lot smarter than the vast majority of people that share his politics.”
SimplyAmazed replied on Oct 24, 2009 at 03:35:00
“I agree Camipco, it should be run something like a debate. Solo argument followed by questions, followed by other argument, followed by questions - each in proper order. If the other justices have not already made up their minds, then why don't they just shut up and let the lawyer finish his/her limited time to speak, and THEN ask questions? The justices are too aggressive with their questioning; only Sotomayor gets a pass for now until she has had time to get into the flow.”
johnr49 replied on Oct 24, 2009 at 03:03:34
“You cannot be serious - he's by far the worst justice on the bench, and in 99% of cases, you know exactly how he'll vote by simply listening to Scalia.”
Franken's Anti-Rape Amendment May Be Stripped By Senior Dem, Sources Say
Commented Oct 22, 2009 at 18:08:32 in Politics
“Ah, the old "it would be more fair if we were allowed to rape our employees without fear of irritating lawsuits." A true America patriot would recognize the right of very rich men to drug, gang rape and lock in shipping containers whoever they please without the oppressive government interfering with their god given right to receive billions of dollars of tax payer money.”
instagladiator replied on Oct 22, 2009 at 18:15:04
“When are you folks going to wake up and realize that "Hey! I just got slapped upside the head again and it hurt!" and DO SOMETHING?
How much slapping upside the head does it take?”
How much slapping upside the head does it take?”
thepoliticalcat replied on Oct 22, 2009 at 18:11:46
“The nerve of these people. Not only do they want to do this to us and our children, but they want us to pay for the privilege!”
Baucus: There May Be 60 Votes For "Less Pure" Public Option
Commented Oct 20, 2009 at 00:50:41 in Politics
“Senator Baucus is apparently ignorant of the rules of the US Senate. 60 votes are not needed to pass a bill. 50 votes are needed, plus the vice president. It says so right here in the US Constitution, Article 1, 4. Perhaps Senator Baucus has the United States Senate confused with some other legislative body in some other country. How embarrassing. He might want to consider purchasing a pocket copy of the US Constitution from the gift shop in the building where he works.
60 votes are needed for cloture to override a filibuster. Any senator who is prepared to take the incredibly radical stance (probably the first in history) of supporting an opposition filibuster should be expelled from the caucus. If Senator Baucus knows of a Democratic Senator who is committed to joining with the GOP to filibuster a Democratic bill, perhaps he should make that name public.”
60 votes are needed for cloture to override a filibuster. Any senator who is prepared to take the incredibly radical stance (probably the first in history) of supporting an opposition filibuster should be expelled from the caucus. If Senator Baucus knows of a Democratic Senator who is committed to joining with the GOP to filibuster a Democratic bill, perhaps he should make that name public.”
nomobull replied on Oct 20, 2009 at 02:50:37
“NO MORE LIKE HOPING WE ARE”
CaptainVideo replied on Oct 20, 2009 at 00:59:29
“Perhaps someone should organize a campaign to send Senator Bogus copies of the Constitution.”
Robert Wexler Resigns From Congress
Commented Oct 14, 2009 at 02:07:40 in Politics
“To all the people yelling "quitter!" and comparing Wexler to Palin.
Wexler has been in congress for 12 years. That's five complete terms and one partial term.
Palin had her job for 3 years, which isn't even a single complete term.
Wexler is leaving one position in the US to work in a different position in the US government (quite possibly Ambassador to Israel) . This is standard practice for democratic and republican politicians. For example, Bush's Secretary of Energy left his job as US Senator to join the Cabinet. He will still be serving the American people.
Palin left her job to dedicate all her time to promoting herself. She is serving only her own facebook account.
Also, Wexler isn't wrong about everything.”
Wexler has been in congress for 12 years. That's five complete terms and one partial term.
Palin had her job for 3 years, which isn't even a single complete term.
Wexler is leaving one position in the US to work in a different position in the US government (quite possibly Ambassador to Israel) . This is standard practice for democratic and republican politicians. For example, Bush's Secretary of Energy left his job as US Senator to join the Cabinet. He will still be serving the American people.
Palin left her job to dedicate all her time to promoting herself. She is serving only her own facebook account.
Also, Wexler isn't wrong about everything.”
trubluelefty replied on Oct 14, 2009 at 02:28:08
“Excellent!”
OverIt replied on Oct 14, 2009 at 02:10:01
“Ha! Love the last line!”
Obama Wins Nobel Peace Prize
Commented Oct 09, 2009 at 10:38:01 in Politics
“quick objection - the Nobel Peace Prize committee doesn't have a "leftest slant". It's a committee that awards a prize for peace... it's made up of people who think that peace is a good thing.”
iskra replied on Oct 09, 2009 at 10:39:53
“Peace?
That's a wimpy leftist point of view no?
War is what 'real' men (and pit bulls) do.”
That's a wimpy leftist point of view no?
War is what 'real' men (and pit bulls) do.”
Elizabeth Warren: Serious Questions Remain About Obama's Loan Relief Plan
Commented Oct 09, 2009 at 05:04:06 in Business
“Will someone please put Elizabeth Warren in charge of fixing the mortgage/banking crisis? Instead of having less competent people in charge of it and then having her watch them and point out when they're being incompeten t... does this seem like an assbackwards way of doing things to anyone else?”
-swift replied on Oct 09, 2009 at 08:26:51
“Put her in charge of fixing the mortgage/banking crisis? Are you crazy?
Put her in charge of everything. She's awesome.
At least get her a new picture for HuffPo. That floating head picture is disturbing.”
Put her in charge of everything. She's awesome.
At least get her a new picture for HuffPo. That floating head picture is disturbing.”
Obama Impeachment Suggested By GOP Dirty Trickster
Commented Oct 08, 2009 at 10:59:16 in Politics
“Funny, because the Founding Fathers got to write down what they "fully intended" and they went with "conviction of treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeano rs." Those wacky founding fathers. Meaning "distasteful behavior" but writing "conviction of treason" must be some kind of 18th century joke I don't get because I've never worn a powdered wig.”
Louis Gohmert: Hate Crimes Bill Will Lead To Nazism, Legalization Of Necrophilia, Pedophilia, Bestiality (VIDEO)
Commented Oct 08, 2009 at 04:27:13 in Politics
“"I'm not a racist, I voted for Alan Keyes" would make an awesome t shirt.”
JMBrodie replied on Oct 08, 2009 at 06:39:46
“Yeah, I need to get me one of those.”


