HuffPost Social News

confuseddemocrat's Comments (213)

View Comments:   Sort:
next
1 - 25 of 213
huffingtonpost entry

Jobs, Mortgages, Food Stamps -- Where Is The President?

Commented Nov 30, 2009 at 21:26:51 in Politics

“Under Reagan, marginal tax rates for the wealthy were reduced however payroll taxes (which affect workers) were raised and several tax deductions which help the poor and working classes were eliminated.

In short Reagan economic policies coupled with his "union" busting practices decimated the working class. It is Reagan policies that have led to the erosion of the middle class.

Furthermore, the recession ended in part because fuel prices began to recede. Any gains made by Reagan came through the creation of economic bubbles. Reagan started this trend of bubble economies by weakening many of the regulations instituted by FDR to prevent market collapses.­.....

Notice that after ascension of Reagan we have had at least three market collapses.­...

Before Reagan the last market collapse was in 1928”

DuganS1 replied on Dec 01, 2009 at 22:19:50

“Unions began to lose significance in the mid to late 1970s. The number of workers in unions as a percentage of the workforce, in fact, peaked in the mid 1950s. That phenomena had more to do with the growth of the service economy than any politics. Reagan's policies didn't lead to the erosion of the middle class. Also note that the big 1986 tax cuts, which brought the top rate down from 50% to 28% was written by Democratic Senators Dick Gephardt and Bill Bradley. About the 1982 recession, it's end had very little to do with receding fuel prices. It had to do with the end of Fed tightening, pent up demand, and a huge increase in real disposable income from the tax cuts. Oil only "receded" from $35-$38 a barrel in 1981-1982 to $30-$32 throughout 1983 and $28-$30 a barrel throughout 1984. It's not like over the past year when it went from $147 at its peak in 2008 down to $32 a barrel in early 2009....”

fourbrrl replied on Dec 01, 2009 at 10:28:52

“...and Bill Clintons NAFTA finished us off.

ALL cut from THE SAME CLOTH my friend”

steelmill replied on Dec 01, 2009 at 02:57:08

“Dugan,you're in your dream world again,snap out of it”
huffingtonpost entry

Sunday Roundup

Commented Nov 29, 2009 at 18:32:23 in Politics

“You are being too over confident.­.....

someone like Bob McDonnell from VA might be a formidable dark horse opponent

I should caution you to remember that Obama was an unknown 3 years ago and it was a forgone conclusion (by the experts) that Hillary was going to be the 2008 democratic nominee”

ckfan replied on Nov 29, 2009 at 18:46:32

“I live in VA. McDonnell will run in 2016 and not 2012. And once the women in this country get even a hint of what was in his college thesis - when he was married, with children and 34 years of age - they won't vote for him, but he still has a chance.”
huffingtonpost entry

Sunday Roundup

Commented Nov 29, 2009 at 17:31:22 in Politics

“The problem has always been prioritiza­tion....As I have been writing for weeks.....­.two main issues got the president elected

1) Palin Debacle

2) September 2008...whe­n the economy fell off the cliff

Obama misread his mandate...­.it was not health care reform or environmental issues....

it was the economy...­.there mere fact that that this administration remains out of sync with the voters is disturbing and suggest a level of tone-deafn­ess...

If it continues.­....it will bring down the Dems ..........­.........”
huffingtonpost entry

Sunday Roundup

Commented Nov 29, 2009 at 17:26:40 in Politics

“Actually it is the Jobs issue which will limit prospects for continued Democratic domination of congress as well as for an Obama second term”
huffingtonpost entry

The Inevitable Fluke That Is Sarah Palin

Commented Nov 17, 2009 at 19:12:51 in Media

“x2”
Paul Krugman's Advice for Obama Job Summit

Paul Krugman's Advice for Obama Job Summit

Commented Nov 16, 2009 at 08:40:26 in Business

“My question is why wasn't the Job summit announced on Jan 21, 2009 as oppose to 10 months into his tenure”
10 Reasons Why the Stupak-Pitts Amendment Has to Go

10 Reasons Why the Stupak-Pitts Amendment Has to Go

Commented Nov 14, 2009 at 12:24:41 in Politics

“First of all ...The Hyde amendment prevents federal subsidy of abortions

Stupak prevents you from using your money to purchase HC which can cover abortion services..­.....this is discrimina­tory......­..........­..”

hp blogger Joe The Nerd Ferraro replied on Nov 14, 2009 at 18:39:04

“yeah it does, vinny
that is why everybody's nose is out of shape.”

vinny replied on Nov 14, 2009 at 14:03:56

“no, it doesn't”
10 Reasons Why the Stupak-Pitts Amendment Has to Go

10 Reasons Why the Stupak-Pitts Amendment Has to Go

Commented Nov 14, 2009 at 12:22:25 in Politics

“Years of GOP playing lip service to pro-life forces and then promptly drop the topic as soon as elected,

Only to have the party of "prochoice" and those feckless blue dog democrats come up with a back door means to essentially ban pro-choice rights....­..........

Just don't get it......”

nestici replied on Nov 14, 2009 at 22:15:42

“But this is perfect politics for the GOP. "Hey I'll yell 'Abortion' and watch all the Democrats self-destruct"

UNLESS, of course we actually stop and read the amendment, take a breath, and start acting like the governing party instead of a set of loosely associated crazies.

A much better explanation of the bill is here:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lanny-davis/stupak-pitts-is-not-worth_b_355168.html

Hysterian68 replied on Nov 14, 2009 at 15:59:39

“but Republicans have always believed in abortion for country clubbers, but everyone else? They can go find a coat hanger.”
The First Ten Lies from <em>Going Rogue</em>

The First Ten Lies from Going Rogue

Commented Nov 14, 2009 at 10:31:58 in Books

“Lie #11...Book is a best seller and that the books were pre-purchased by 'Millions and millions of Americans"

In truth many of these right-wing books are bought in bulk by conservative think tanks and groups to force the book onto the the best seller list.....a propaganda ploy

Then these books are given away for free when people buy magazines, buy tea shirts, call radio stations or attend rallies...­.”

carolr51 replied on Nov 14, 2009 at 11:43:18

“I've already seen an ad offering the book for $4.99 with purchase of a subscription to the National Review. Pathetic.”

bluemirror replied on Nov 14, 2009 at 11:40:50

“We know about the window-dressing tactics.

John McCain needs to stop this woman. She cannot represent America anywhere.”
huffingtonpost entry

No, Rachel, No! This "Health Reform" Could Lose the Middle Class for Dems

Commented Nov 14, 2009 at 10:23:21 in Politics

“keep voting ..........­....as well as continuing to stock up on pitchforks, tar and feathers”

theycallthewindmariah replied on Nov 14, 2009 at 11:56:18

“I was wondering what your answer would be as I generally like your posts. Add to that list the basic things you need to keep yourself and your family alive and safe. Form strong personal connections not only with friends and family, but your community as well. When times get tougher we're going to need each other. Blessings to you.”

gloryoski replied on Nov 14, 2009 at 11:44:39

“And maybe wanting what "we wouldn't want."”
huffingtonpost entry

No, Rachel, No! This "Health Reform" Could Lose the Middle Class for Dems

Commented Nov 14, 2009 at 09:54:41 in Politics

“Yes representative of the corporations and the wealthy elite.....­..........­.....”

theycallthewindmariah replied on Nov 14, 2009 at 10:17:45

“What's your plan for changing that?”
huffingtonpost entry

No, Rachel, No! This "Health Reform" Could Lose the Middle Class for Dems

Commented Nov 14, 2009 at 09:51:43 in Politics

“Your comments are spot on....ther­e is a disconnect among progressives regarding the sentiments and feelings of the general public about healthcare reform...

As stated previously, the bread and butter issue is jobs and the longer the Dems stay on HC without addressing the economy...­the more likely they will be punished in 2010 and 2012......

With regards to HC reform, the stark reality is that there are not enough "millionaires" to finance healthcare reform...

And even if there were...you can guarantee that some politician has already embedded or will include some provision which creates loopholes so that the wealthy can evade the surcharges­...

Hence in order to fund this program, the criteria for being "wealthy" will have to be lowered and the costs will have to fall disproportionately onto the shrinking middle class and the ever increasing working poor classes

Moreover if reports are true about the $750 fine being levied on employers who don't offer coverage, I fear this will actually encourage some employers into opting out of providing healthcare to their employees (since many pay more to provide coverage) further devastating middle/working class families

So like you, I don't see how this bill will lead to the creation of generations of loyal voters who are enthralled with the Democratic party”

Jimbo554 replied on Nov 14, 2009 at 11:15:26

“The alternative to employers being required to provide insurance coverage was for the government to do it, but the teabaggers and the blue dog dinos saw to that a government run program would not be allowed.”

theycallthewindmariah replied on Nov 14, 2009 at 10:12:01

“Let me just say that if we don't get Health Care Reform this year and if it gets killed by Democrats then this Dem voter will no longer support the party. I'm 63 and have been a loyal Dem all my life and, when I had lots of money, gave generously and worked hard for Dem candidates. But I want to see an end to 47,000 people dying a year because of lack of access to health care. I want to see pre-existing conditions covered and to no longer hear stories of dying children who have been dropped from insurance when they need it the most.

If this bill dies, my conclusion will be that eliteist Dems, either with insurance or still covered by their parents' plans (alot of those on HuffPo) don't give a sh$t about working people who are dying.”
A Muslim Soldier's View from Fort Hood

A Muslim Soldier's View from Fort Hood

Commented Nov 07, 2009 at 11:05:43 in World

“And of course his Christian superior officers and colleagues who also saw warning signs don't share any responsibi­lity......­..........­.....”

ArborialBiped replied on Nov 07, 2009 at 11:28:01

“It is unlikely that they had the same sort of knowledge of the man gained from intimate conversations about faith, duty, etc., dontcha think?”
A Muslim Soldier's View from Fort Hood

A Muslim Soldier's View from Fort Hood

Commented Nov 07, 2009 at 07:17:42 in World

“One of thing that bothered me yesterday was all those conservative AM radio hosts who used this unfortunate event to promulgate hate-filled pronouncements about individuals who follow Islam as well as about the Islamic faith

And of course after their rants, they immediately and predictably chastised the Muslim community for not apologizing loudly and often enough. Even some posts here (while sympathetic) still want Muslims to come out publicly and speak out against this atrocity. I understand the point is to try to convince the public not to fear Islam.

However, I feel when we continuously make demands that Muslims condemn any acts of violence that was perpetrated by someone who claims to follow Islam, we do a disservice to that community because we are indirectly (unconsciously) supporting the supposition that Muslims are fanatical terrorists­.....

We don't ask this of any Christian organization when members commit horrific acts ..., and thus we should not demand such from the American Islamic communitie­s.....

We should use this event to embrace the Muslim community and demonstrate to them, that we (non-muslims) understand that this act of violence was committed by an extremely disturbed person and is not an indictment on any religious faith”
huffingtonpost entry

Eight Reasons the Democrats lost Virginia & New Jersey--and How to Recover

Commented Nov 06, 2009 at 10:10:32 in Politics

“Your article is spot on.

The Dems and Obama are in a very precarious condition.­....and their attempts to minimize these disturbing trends such as the rising populist anger over the bailouts, Wall Street's lack of accountability and the uneven effects of this so-called economy recovery is not helping their cause among independents or many in the Democratic base

Had Obama put forth aggressive policies to help struggling homeowners and had he pushed an aggressive jobs creation and training bills, a vigorous infrastructure enhancement program and offered financial reforms that enforced anti-trust laws, ensured consumer protections, provided easy credit and capital to small businesses and punished those who destroyed the economy then:

1) He could have called the GOP on their obstructionism by demonstrating that they (GOP) are more than willing to allow millions to suffer the indignity of unemployment and financial collapse..­...

2) He would not be have viewed as a corporate shill who is more interested in Wall street well being than mainstreet's woes.....

3) He could have created a real HC reform bill with a single payer clause rather than weak public option (with trigger) that will cover 2-3% of the population

Lastly, the Dems treatment of ACORN is scandalous­....and their abandonment of this organization will impede their ability to mobilize traditional Dem voters in upcoming elections.­.

I just can't quite comprehend why Dems were so willing (so quickly) to abandon their populist ideals and constituents”

NoLipService replied on Nov 06, 2009 at 11:59:46

“Obama is all about controlling more and more of our lives and making us more and more dependant on government. People want Liberty and Choice and they see it being taken away from them at an alarming rate with job losses mounting up to extreme levels.

Nothing Obama has done has been to help the people without jobs. His stimulus which included crazy items like a new lawn mower, funding of the arts, and numerous other crazy things is coming to light.

November of 2010 is going to be very interesting.”
Obama One Year Later: The Audacity of Winning vs. The Timidity of Governing

Obama One Year Later: The Audacity of Winning vs. The Timidity of Governing

Commented Nov 03, 2009 at 10:06:09 in Politics

“how much time to the jobless and those who are in foreclosure have?”

gifu replied on Nov 03, 2009 at 10:12:58

“Welcome to the game of life.”
Obama One Year Later: The Audacity of Winning vs. The Timidity of Governing

Obama One Year Later: The Audacity of Winning vs. The Timidity of Governing

Commented Nov 03, 2009 at 10:04:28 in Politics

“the problem is that Obama is not passing legislation that is consistent with democratic ideology..­...he is playing games with the repubs to water down bills only to have the Repubs vote against it AND he is ignoring the well being of the grass-roots

Except for the bush-league politics and an inability to make decisions and stand by those conviction­s...he really is no different from the GOP (with regards to policies)”

Politiqo replied on Nov 03, 2009 at 10:22:48

“FANNED”
Obama One Year Later: The Audacity of Winning vs. The Timidity of Governing

Obama One Year Later: The Audacity of Winning vs. The Timidity of Governing

Commented Nov 03, 2009 at 09:48:35 in Politics

“How can one undo Bush policies while continuing to perpetuate them?”
Obama One Year Later: The Audacity of Winning vs. The Timidity of Governing

Obama One Year Later: The Audacity of Winning vs. The Timidity of Governing

Commented Nov 03, 2009 at 09:47:38 in Politics

“thank you...

many have become so enchanted and enraptured by the cult of personality, that they have been more than willing to accept minor policy changes and then declare them earth shattering victories while ignoring the administration's refusal to reverse the economic policies and the odious unconstitutional human right practices of the Bush administration

And don't get me started on the outright inability to institute aggressive policies to assist the unemployed and underemployed as well as hurting homeowners and retirees who have been decimated by the unethical practices of Wall street, the financials and the housing industry”
One Year After Election Day: The Verdict on Obama

One Year After Election Day: The Verdict on Obama

Commented Nov 02, 2009 at 10:18:14 in Politics

“Finally someone has the guts to say it ...Obama's biggest miscalculation was tackling the healthcare reform first ...... BRAVO

Had Obama put forth aggressive policies to help struggling homeowners and had he pushed an aggressive jobs creation bill, a jobs training bill and a financial reform bill that ensured consumer protections, provided easy credit and capital to small businesses and punished those who destroyed the economy then:

1) he could have called the GOP on their obstructionism by demonstrating that they (GOP) are more willing to allow millions to suffer the indignity of unemployment and financial collapse..­...

2) Americans would have viewed Obama as not being a corporate shill and as being more interested in Wall street than mainstreet­.....

And only after that, would Americans be more amenable to HC reform because the argument could have been framed that health care reform was/is part of an overall strategy to bolster the American middle and working classes”

joebaggadonuts replied on Nov 09, 2009 at 18:36:04

“That might have been what JFK might have done. He's no JFK. And he's no FDR either.

I just hope he knows how to steer well enough to keep us off the edge of the cliff(s) as we go careening down the winding mountain road with no brakes.”

gd h replied on Nov 02, 2009 at 13:11:04

“My concern about the stimulus from the beginning was that there is hardly any mention of "jobs" or "job training". Instead, just some platitudes (creating or saving jobs-absurdly impossible to measure). So now that the money and political capital is gone, he's going to throw us a few bones? Maybe? Please? Just a little stack of breadcrumbs for individuals who need jobs and for small businesses?”
huffingtonpost entry

Why Keep Geithner?

Commented Nov 02, 2009 at 09:21:32 in Business

“And ironically many of those who benefited from Obama's largess with regards to treatment of the Banksters are openly supporting the Republicans (ostensibly because of Obama' s scant "criticism" of executive pay

The GOP is now out raising the Dems once more”

hyjanks replied on Nov 02, 2009 at 09:32:43

“You have any statistics to back that up? Who in his right mind would contribute anything to the party of Palin, Gingrich and Limbaugh? Oh. I forgot. Nobody in that party has a right mind.”
huffingtonpost entry

Why Keep Geithner?

Commented Nov 02, 2009 at 09:12:54 in Business

“truthfully, Obama was never against the establishm­ent...he just wanted to be a major part of it........­..”

freelyb replied on Nov 02, 2009 at 09:22:19

“I see it that way as well.”
huffingtonpost entry

Why Keep Geithner?

Commented Nov 02, 2009 at 09:02:19 in Business

“you are on a roll now ...fanned and faved”
huffingtonpost entry

Why Keep Geithner?

Commented Nov 02, 2009 at 08:57:36 in Business

“this would be funny if it wasn't so true

Rather than fighting against "government takeover" of the Banking system (as the GOP likes to say)

We should be fighting against the Banking Takeover of the Government”

sixchair replied on Nov 02, 2009 at 09:04:37

“Trust me, no attempt at humor. Truly sad. Every child should place their hands over their eyes and repeat this daily.”
Lies, Statistics and Economic Statistics

Lies, Statistics and Economic Statistics

Commented Nov 02, 2009 at 08:33:06 in Business

“fanned”
next
1 - 25 of 213