HuffPost Social News

elkabong's Comments (405)

View Comments:   Sort:
next
1 - 25 of 405
Why We Lost Healthcare

Why We Lost Healthcare

Commented Dec 15, 2009 at 13:26:42 in Politics

“No, you don't know. No one, no one, I reapeat, no one has proposed socialized medicine. The most anyone has proposed is socialized health insurance. There are nations where medical professionals work for the state. That hasn't been proposed by anyone. Not even Senator Sanders, an avowed socialist.

Doesn't it bother you that you have the time to comment here but no time to make sure you know what you're writing about? Does it bother you that you don't know what you're writing about?

Insurance corporations are parasites. They produce nothing and their profits increase when they find ways, ethical or not, to deny claims. They suck the life out of our potential growth as individuals and as a nation.”

texasteph12570 replied on Dec 15, 2009 at 15:48:59

“well i agree with the comments on insurance companies, but to say that government is any better is ridiculous.
• Does anybody out there have any memory of the reason given for the establishment of the DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ... during the Carter Administration? Anybody? Anything? No? Didn't think so ! The 'Department of Energy' was instituted on 8- 04-1977 TO LESSEN OUR DEPENDENCE ON FOREIGN OIL. AND NOW IT'S 2009, 32 YEARS LATER ... AND THE BUDGET FOR THIS NECESSARY DEPARTMENT IS AT $24.2 BILLION A YEAR IT HAS 16,000 FEDERAL EMPLOYEES AND APPROXIMATELY 100,000 CONTRACT EMPLOYEES AND LOOK AT THE JOB IT HAS DONE!”
huffingtonpost entry

Bank Weekend...

Commented Dec 15, 2009 at 12:49:55 in Business

“Campaign finance is the disease - everything else, merely a symptom.

Unfortunately, those who can cure it, benefit from the illness.”
Why We Lost Healthcare

Why We Lost Healthcare

Commented Dec 15, 2009 at 10:12:41 in Politics

“When did creating optimal solutions equal expending political capital? It seems to me they're expending political capital by passing crap and calling it reform. It seems to me they're trading political capital for campaign contributions.

They call themselves "leaders." What a joke.”
Evangelicals, Israel, and the End of the World

Evangelicals, Israel, and the End of the World

Commented Dec 15, 2009 at 09:58:04 in World

“"Religious bondage shackles and debilitates the mind and unfits it for every noble enterprise."

- James Madison

"Ecclesiastical establishments tend to great ignorance and corruption, all of which facilitate the execution of mischievous projects."

- James Madison

"Shake off all the fears of servile prejudices, under which weak minds are servilely crouched. Fix reason firmly in her seat, and call on her tribunal for every fact, every opinion. Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear."

- Thomas Jefferson

"In every country and in every age, the priest has been hostile to liberty. He is always in alliance with the despot.... they have perverted the purest religion ever preached to man into mystery and jargon, unintelligible to all mankind, and therefore the safer engine for their purpose."

- Thomas Jefferson

"...religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legislative powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should 'make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,' thus building a wall of separation between church and State."

- Thomas Jefferson”

StJames replied on Dec 15, 2009 at 13:22:58

“Too bad neither of them had the courage of their convictions.”

Ahsanm replied on Dec 15, 2009 at 10:26:13

“if one believes that the end-of-times were around the corner then a common sense approach would be to do plenty of good deeds to earn God's favors but...in case of Evangelicals this theory would not apply since they are convinced that they are chosen one therefore good deeds are irrelevent.”
Evangelicals, Israel, and the End of the World

Evangelicals, Israel, and the End of the World

Commented Dec 15, 2009 at 09:57:44 in World

“"The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason."

- Benjamin Franklin

"Of all the tyrannies that affect mankind, tyranny of religion is the worst."

- Thomas Paine

"I do not believe in the creed professed by the Jewish Church, by the Roman Church, by the Greek Church, by the Turkish Church, by the Protestant Church, nor by any Church that I know of. My own mind is my own Church. Each of those churches accuse the other of unbelief; and for my own part, I disbelieve them all."

- Thomas Paine

"All national institutions of churches, whether Jewish, Christian or Turkish, appear to me no other than human inventions, set up to terrify and enslave mankind, and monopolize power and profit."

- Thomas Paine

"This would be the best of all possible worlds, if there were no religion in it."

- John Adams”

CollinJE replied on Dec 15, 2009 at 10:50:25

“Don't forget Abe Lincoln. Must people have never read some of his really great quotes on religion.

"The Bible is not my book nor Christianity my profession."

"It will not do to investigate the subject of religion too closely, as it is apt to lead to Infidelity."”

JohnJames replied on Dec 15, 2009 at 10:38:04

“Unimaginable that any elected official in Washington or most anywhere else would ever say any one of these things today and anyone who dared to would be excoriated by his or her colleagues, the mainstream media and most of the public. The founding fathers would be so proud of us.”
huffingtonpost entry

Senators Should Visit a Free Health Care Clinic to Really See the America They Represent... and Deny

Commented Dec 12, 2009 at 10:48:09 in Politics

“What we have been doing is throwing money at the problem, including multi-billion dollar subsidies to the PRIVATE insurance companies that do the job less efficiently and at a higher cost than Medicare. Medicare Advantage and Medicare Plus are prime examples.

That's why we should have a single payer system. It's much, much cheaper. No advertising. No billion dollar executive compensation. No shareholder profit. There should be no profit motive in health insurance. It's not good for our health. It's not good for our industries that actually MAKE things of value. Pushing money around should not be what America does. Unfortunately, that has become increasingly the case.

Insurance corporations are parasites. They produce nothing and their profits increase when they find ways, ethical or not, to deny service. They suck the life out of our potential growth as individuals and as a nation.”
huffingtonpost entry

Senators Should Visit a Free Health Care Clinic to Really See the America They Represent... and Deny

Commented Dec 12, 2009 at 01:57:23 in Politics

“We're in the trouble we're in because of attitudes like yours. We hang together or we hang separately while bankers buy their third beach houses. Your attitude is great, if you like 1950's Cuba. Look how well that turned out.”

Pinchy replied on Dec 12, 2009 at 07:58:50

“Your post makes no sense. Hanging together has nothing to do with it. The government has no ability to guarantee this 'right' even if they tax the rich (soon to be anyone earning over $100k in their book) at 100% and spend every dime of that money on the healthcare system. Don't believe me? Just look at the education system. The more money we spend on it, the worse it gets. And it certainly doesn't guarantee equal quality. The schools in East Los Angeles are a good example of that.”
huffingtonpost entry

Senators Should Visit a Free Health Care Clinic to Really See the America They Represent... and Deny

Commented Dec 11, 2009 at 18:14:47 in Politics

“Campaign finance is the disease - everything else, merely a symptom.
Unfortunately, the ones who can change it, benefit from the illness.

Thanks, Ed.”
Health Care Reform: Sifting Through the Suboptimal Solutions

Health Care Reform: Sifting Through the Suboptimal Solutions

Commented Dec 10, 2009 at 21:50:10 in Politics

“"Tort reform, tort reform, tort reform."

Tort reform is what Republicans call institutionalized irresponsibility for the wealthy. Tort reform MIGHT save about 1% by all estimates. They had tort reform in Mccallum, Texas. Mccallum, Texas has the most expensive health care in the US of A.

The AM radio is not your friend.”

maab76 replied on Dec 11, 2009 at 10:03:04

“Tort reform would be reduced if information provided is reformed first. If you are apprised of the process, the difficulties, and the probable outcome, you should be less likely to sue for damages. Our reform should also include those who can translate the medical information to the patient in a form that can be understood. Praise the professional Physician Assistants!”

Ammymart replied on Dec 11, 2009 at 04:10:24

“Use the health care reform!
www.internationaldrugmart.com
huffingtonpost entry

Contradictory Republicans Still Flummoxed By Medicare

Commented Dec 10, 2009 at 06:52:29 in Politics

“Just so Republicans are clear (if that's possible). They're not proposing cuts to Medicare. They're proposing cuts to Medicare Advantage and Medicare Plus - PRIVATE insurance companies' costlier versions of Medicare that have been subsidized by the taxpayer for decades. Guess where the subsidies go? 'Into the pockets of the CEOs. Why they haven't cut them sooner should be the question.

Free market, my a$$.”

mootown replied on Dec 10, 2009 at 07:58:28

“GNOPers know they don't have to tell the truth (although by now, they can't tell truth from lie)--all they have to do is bleat "Medicare cuts" and their sheep don't know the difference.”

Hoosierbrad replied on Dec 10, 2009 at 07:22:54

“They haven't cut them because, until now, Bush would have vetoed any cut.”
huffingtonpost entry

Contradictory Republicans Still Flummoxed By Medicare

Commented Dec 10, 2009 at 06:51:09 in Politics

“They're not proposing cuts to Medicare. They're proposing cuts to Medicare Advantage and Medicare Plus - PRIVATE insurance companies' costlier versions of Medicare that have been subsidized by the taxpayer for decades. Guess where the subsidies go? 'Into the pockets of the CEOs. Why they haven't cut it sooner should be the question.

Free market, my a$$.”
Weathering the 2010 Storm

Weathering the 2010 Storm

Commented Dec 08, 2009 at 00:45:19 in Politics

“Respectfully, i completely disagree. The reason people aren't hiring is not because they're worried about legislation. They're worried that people aren't BUYING. There is one thing and one thing only that creates jobs. It is DEMAND for goods and services.

The reason there isn't demand is because people have no money. The reason they have no money is because "the people with the money" decided about 30 years ago that supply-side economics was a panacea; because they did their best to abolish trade unions; because they gave jobs to Indians and to Chinese instead of Americans; because they wanted it all.

Wages have been flat or in decline while expenses have been rising. Even with two incomes, many could barely make ends meet. Eventually, the middle class turned to using their homes as ATMs. Now, they can't even do that.

Who says we MUST do business with countries that don't meet our environment, safety and wage standards? Who says we MUST allow businesses that outsource to the lowest bidder to do business in America?

What you're suggesting is a race to a third-world standard of living. You can't be suggesting that Americans work for 3 dollars a day, can you? Isn't that the logical extension of your argument?”

bighat replied on Dec 08, 2009 at 10:36:16

“We each have our own opinions. From the schools we attended, the colleagues we have and the environment we live in.

My earlier comment was based on the reason that caused the Great Depression. People did not have any money then either. So they were not buying. Same thing you suggested. If we are not working than we cannot buy.

Unions and academics convinced congress to add high tariffs to any imported good. A trade war ensued. We lost. Took WWII to get us back on our feet.

If we only trade with those countries that have the same laws we do as in regard to wages and environmental laws then we will find ourselves isolated. We have to make better products at better prices as well as out trade them. When was the last time America had a trading surplus with any country.

Does America have the ability to produce almost everything we need. Probably. But at what cost. Unions killed the steel industry and unions killed the auto industry. Unions are also not doing any favors for the teachers

Do you shop at Walmart. Anything you can purchase at Walmart you can just as easily purchase somewhere else.

Global warming treaties may strip America of all manufacturing. We could end up importing everything while only exporting movies.

Global warming treaties is designed to reduce the power of rich countries and transfer the power and wealth to poor countries so all will be equal.”
Weathering the 2010 Storm

Weathering the 2010 Storm

Commented Dec 07, 2009 at 23:45:48 in Politics

“The Democrats could actually pick up seats in both the House and the Senate and president Obama could guarantee himself a second term if they only did two things:

1. Announce that campaign finance is the disease and that just about everything else that's wrong with America are merely the symptoms.

2. Do something about it.”

DidleySquat replied on Dec 08, 2009 at 15:27:16

“3. Silence the "progressive" minority from bleating..”

Zombeaver replied on Dec 08, 2009 at 01:39:30

“Agree”

yakmeat replied on Dec 08, 2009 at 01:05:04

“If they actually did this, they would have my vote for sure!”
Weathering the 2010 Storm

Weathering the 2010 Storm

Commented Dec 07, 2009 at 23:45:11 in Politics

“Maybe you can help me with a couple of things. How would the "state line" proposal, if instituted, keep insurance companies from racing to headquarter in those states with the laxest regulation? How would lax regulation keep the insurance companies from continuing their parasitical practices?”

roudy replied on Dec 09, 2009 at 16:18:59

“The only regulatory agencies that can assist the consumer if he had problems with his insurance company are those that exist at the state level. In some states these agency are very good, in others not so much. The problem is that once the federal government sets up regulatory statures at the federal level, then the state agencies have no authority. Federal statutes always supersedes state.

But we all know just looking at the banking and financial institutions, that the Federal agencies in the real world do nothing to regulate these companies, even though they have the statutes in place to do so. The same lack of enforcement would of course apply to the insurance companies.

As the laws stand now, you can at least call a state agency and request help if you have a problem with your insurance company. There is simply no other assistance available for the consumer against thes huge insurance companies. And the state agencies do have the authority to fine these companies, to compel them to pay legitimate claims, and ultimately to refuse to allow them to continue business in the state.

So when you see someone posting to transfer this regulation from the state level to the federal level, you can rest assumed that is a paid poster for the insurance companies.”

Terry Mcintyre replied on Dec 09, 2009 at 15:41:37

“Customers would be free to shop for whatever they want. In today's environment, customers are locked into state-provided insurance cartels. You really should research the concept of "regulatory capture", to discover who the real beneficiary of state regulation is - not the customers, but the cartel. This is known to all economists, except those who are bought and paid for by a) industry and b) government.

If you think big corporations and government are not allied, you ought to explain why big industry contributes so much to the very politicians who appoint the "regulators" who you expect to "regulate" the industry. Is this not a serious conflict of interest?

Who watches the watchers?”
huffingtonpost entry

It's a Helluva State

Commented Dec 06, 2009 at 15:12:28 in New York

“I hope English isn't your first language.”

byla replied on Dec 06, 2009 at 15:31:31

“Wow, I have to agree with you on that one. I'm not even sure what bbplayer5 is trying to say.

However, bbplayer5, you're right that Latin-American people as a generalized whole (and I really don't like generalizing) are against "gay." Oddly enough, one of my favorite Mexican restaurants in Charlotte is owned by two gay Mexicans and most of the male wait-staff are gay as well. To every rule there is always an exception.

Dubya won his second election because he made it an issue, and with that issue he won over a large portion of the African-American voters, who normally wouldn't have voted for him otherwise.”
huffingtonpost entry

It's a Helluva State

Commented Dec 06, 2009 at 14:23:17 in New York

“I'm sorry, Cynthia. You'd think NY would have done the right thing. But I believe the government should stay out of the marriage business altogether and sanction civil-unions only. Then, if the couple wishes to be "married," they could do so in the church of their choice. In either case, they could call it what they like.

People who have a problem with gays are scared, like they're scared about most things. That's the way they were raised. They may not admit it, even to themselves, but they they think it's contagious. They're afraid their children will go homo if they're exposed to it.

It would be nice if they figured out it's not a choice. It would be nice if they thought that maybe it's God's idea of population control.

Soon, it won't matter what they think. Soon, there won't be enough of them to stop it.”

byla replied on Dec 06, 2009 at 15:49:01

“You're right. Maybe it's the terminology that needs to be changed. I mean "marriage" I think (I could be wrong) is a biblical term, meaning "sanctioned under God" Apparently, Godly sanctioning isn't really working.

Possibly, we should just obliterate the word "marriage" completely. It doesn't seem to mean a whole lot to the heterosexual community. I mean, 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 years and divorce is a dime a dozen.

We really need to switch to civil unions which is a LEGAL contract. Certain rights are afforded to "married" people, when in actuality, it should be a legal issue. It should be a legal contract.”

bbplayer5 replied on Dec 06, 2009 at 15:05:30

“It is a choice! Its not some dumb gene that makes you gay. People choose to be gay. Its a temptation and its wrong!”

bbplayer5 replied on Dec 06, 2009 at 15:02:14

“It is a choice! There is no gene that makes you gay. Its a temptation and its wrong to act on it!”

justmeinAz replied on Dec 06, 2009 at 14:56:16

“Your first paragraph is my thought exactly. Marriage is a muddy term, because it is a mix of a legal state of being and a religious one as well, and we haven't had to look at that muddle at all until gay marriage came on the radar. The two aspects should be completely divorced (pun intended,) so that all couples are treated the same according to the state via their civil union, and the issue of marriage then becomes solely between a couple and their church. Churches that don't allow it will lose droves of homosexual couples to those that do. This to me makes sense.”
huffingtonpost entry

Stop Teabagging Jay Nordlinger -- He Has Enough Problems

Commented Dec 04, 2009 at 20:05:06 in Media

“Well said!”
huffingtonpost entry

Are We Not Romans?

Commented Dec 04, 2009 at 13:05:40 in World

“George C. Scott was a Hollywood actor. I can probably think of something more ironic but not at the moment.

Excellent post.”
huffingtonpost entry

How I Wish The Global Warming Deniers Were Right...

Commented Dec 04, 2009 at 11:55:09 in Green

“Ignore the deniers. Forget them. If we do nothing and it becomes clear beyond question that they are wrong, they'll only look for someone else to blame. They still think the financial collapse wasn't caused by Reaganomics, free-trade and deregulation. They'll tell you with a straight face it was Barney Frank. Their ignorance is willful and overwhelming. The best thing to do is to tell them to go jump in a lake while there is still a lake in which to jump.”

Bogstomper replied on Dec 04, 2009 at 12:08:55

“"Ignore the deniers."

That's already happening, oddly enough because the free market is outrunning the deniers. The clean energy revolution is already underway. While the deniers claim that clean energy is "decades away," clean energy is being installed. Here in Texas, wind energy is becoming big business, because as one free marketeer said, wind is like an oilfield that doesn't run out.

In the meantime, we still need to correct the deniers, because their anti-science approach to life is dangerous for this country.”

Oubastet replied on Dec 04, 2009 at 12:07:17

“There are very few things more disconcerting than willful ignorance.”
huffingtonpost entry

The Business

Commented Dec 04, 2009 at 07:11:48 in Politics

“"He doesn't have to "fix" the economy. He needs to introduce a business friendly atmosphere and get the hell out of the way. That includes tax cuts..."

Sounds exactly like Bush. You know what they say about doing the same thing and expecting different result. I think the same thing goes for advocating doing the same thing and expecting different results.”
huffingtonpost entry

Conservatives Want Republican Purge Trials

Commented Dec 03, 2009 at 11:26:10 in Politics

“Thanks, Mr. Frank.

I think this purity test comes as a result of being acutely aware that things are a huge mess while being absolutely certain that none of it is their fault. It can't be Reaganism. It can't be conservatism. It can never and will never be themselves. It can be only one of two things: Those damn libs or those damn libs posing as Republicans. It doesn't get much more complicated than that. Of course, the "libs" to whom they refer are figments of Sean's and Rush's imagination and bear as much relation to reality as Reaganomics does to middle-class prosperity, but it's much easier to call us "baby-killers" than to ask why abortion rates went down under Clinton and up under Bush and to question the nonsense they've been trained to believe all of their lives.”
huffingtonpost entry

Obama's Unavoidable Cure for the Afghanistan Cancer

Commented Dec 02, 2009 at 19:04:54 in World

“There's no question we were royally screwed by George and Dick, but I'd sooner see us use special forces missions and cash. You don't go after small bands of dedicated terrs with battalions and an insurgency will always outlast us.

Secure the nukes - one way or another. Give every Afghani a couple thousand bucks. Don't give it to some mayor. Do it door-to-door. Tell them we're very sorry and get the hell out. Let them build their own hospitals. Let us build an economy independent of fossil fuel.”
huffingtonpost entry

9/11? Yes, 9/11.

Commented Dec 02, 2009 at 17:20:08 in Politics

“Fifteen if the nineteen hijackers were from Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia is the biggest exporter of terrorism in the world. Do you wonder why we never talk about it? I don't.

Let's get really real: 9/11 was ultimately about oil. They don't hate us for our freedoms.

We wouldn't have been fooling around in the middle-east at all; we wouldn't have quartered troops; we wouldn't have built an airbase that was anathema to many of them and we wouldn't be in Iraq and Afghanistan right now if it wasn't for oil.

I cringed when pres. Obama said, "We will not claim another nation's resources" although he was correct: We'll never claim it. We'll always call it something else.

I like the pres.. I worked, donated and voted for him. I hope and pray he succeeds. But I'm afraid he's wasting more time and resources when the investment to solve our fiscal, employment and security problems would be a maximum investment in alternative energy. I thought he knew it.”

saavedra77 replied on Dec 02, 2009 at 19:54:21

“"Fifteen if the nineteen hijackers were from Saudi Arabia."

And yet Osama bin Laden is an outlaw in Saudi Arabia and Al Qaeda is opposed to the Saudi government. Which is more of a threat: The country where the hijackers and bin Laden happen to have been born, or the governments and organizations that sheltered and helped them?”
Arianna, Jesse Ventura And Ben Stein Discuss Afghanistan On <em>Larry King Live</em> (VIDEO)

Arianna, Jesse Ventura And Ben Stein Discuss Afghanistan On Larry King Live (VIDEO)

Commented Dec 01, 2009 at 08:20:08 in Politics

“I think you're misreading Arianna's point. She's not suggesting we wage wars we can afford. She's saying that if we're going to wage war, it should not be put on a credit card. She's saying that it's hypocritical to say that health-care should be deficit neutral and that it's ok to add wars to the deficit.

There is something seriously wrong with people who support war, scream for tax-cuts and whine about the deficit simultaneously.”

wmfor replied on Dec 01, 2009 at 08:54:44

“Of course, things like health care are not such priorities as the systematic killing of people. Any right-to-lifer can tell you that.”

brit prof replied on Dec 01, 2009 at 08:29:28

“That's my point. When you send people to kill and be killed it should NEVER be about the cost. It is either right or wrong.”
huffingtonpost entry

Shocked -- Or Not? New Data Shows Abortion Quite Common In Most Red States

Commented Nov 30, 2009 at 23:17:02 in Politics

“I was wondering why they're always chanting "we're #1." Now I know.”
next
1 - 25 of 405