HuffPost Social News

euthman's Comments (166)

View Comments:   Sort:
next
1 - 25 of 166
Possible MS Breakthrough Neglected By American Media

Possible MS Breakthrough Neglected By American Media

Commented Dec 21, 2009 at 17:29:27 in Living

“As a pathologist, the assertion that the cause of MS is iron toxicity due to vein blockage is completely at odds with what is known about MS, about veins, and about iron. I would need a lot more evidence than an Italian surgeon on YouTube to induce me to give any credence to his claim.”

Ranta replied on Dec 21, 2009 at 20:42:26

“As a Physical Therapist who grew up in Minnesota and now live in Tennessee, I saw many more MS in the north than in the south. For some reason, MS thrives in temperate climates. What can Dr. Zamboni's finding have to to with climate?”

FormerRushListener replied on Dec 21, 2009 at 18:50:15

“As a pathologist, tell me what comes first, blood brain barrier leakage or myelin breakdown?”

Josephius replied on Dec 21, 2009 at 17:37:05

“I agree, and made the same statement last week (but it was suspiciously moderated out. Hmmmm, very strange.)”
Does Death Exist? New Theory Says 'No'

Does Death Exist? New Theory Says 'No'

Commented Dec 09, 2009 at 23:37:36 in Living

“Life is short, and windedness is long, so here's a tip:

When an author or speaker mentions quantum mechanics in the context of physiology, psychology, or medicine, stop reading/listening, because otherwise you'll be wasting your valuable time.”

Jimboy17 replied on Dec 10, 2009 at 00:59:15

“Um. No. There's a great paper on anaesthetics and the quantum nature of consciousness. Basically, there aren't any good macro empirical models for why we can knock people out with certain drugs. In fact, it would seem that the effect is rather better explained by quantum theory. I have put the darned thing in a box, and cannot find it, but will search pub med at some point to see if I can't reference it, as the lingo is quite beyond my meagre ability.”

wouldilie replied on Dec 10, 2009 at 00:31:23

“This comment is spot on, the application of quantum mechanics to large biological systems is ridiculous, people who attempt to do so either have no understanding of either, are crazy or have an agenda. Since his resume presumes he understands biology, I will assume an agenda - or maybe crazy.

I can accept that Dr. Lanza is upset about his sister, but that doesn't justify labelling his wishful thinking of a quantum multiverse afterlife as "science". His education and critical thinking skills may have shown him the limitations of organized religion, but fanciful applications of non-relevant physical principles, are no better, and not worthy of coverage in science reporting.

Bodies and minds are fueled by chemical reactions. When we think or move we use the energy, and our bodies generate heat or motion or whatever, that is the energy being conserved. When the brain becomes unable to orchestrate the bodies functioning the chemical reactions cease, sometimes quickly and sometimes gradually and you die. No energy is left except the potential of energy - you become meat to be consumed.

If your body is cold worm, dog or people food, where does this mystical energy field live? Is it stored in air? In magical particles that vibrate invisibly - lucky we have never found them or we would be swamped by the ghosts of every living thing that has ever had a nervous system! Billions of dinosaur and trilobyte ghosts everywhere!

Too much wishful thinking and too many invisible sky wizards.”

peacebro replied on Dec 10, 2009 at 00:11:24

“I understand you to say there is no correlation between some things and yet know better. Nothing is or can be disconnected from anything else in creation. Wake up Bro!”

Marcus01 replied on Dec 10, 2009 at 00:00:18

“What would you know about it?”

PoliSci2008 replied on Dec 09, 2009 at 23:55:20

“I wasn't planning on commenting, but when I read your sentiments about the author's reference on quantum mechanics, I just had to chime in with an agreement. I began reading this articule with sufficient interest and QUICKLY BECAME BORED AFTER THE FIRST 3 OR 4 PARAGRAPHS AND STOP READING!

Oh Well, next article!”

kwombles replied on Dec 09, 2009 at 23:51:04

“"considered one of the leading scientists in the world" -- you gotta wonder, by whom? Deepak?Well, at least Huff puts them all together on one site, right? One stop shopping for all manner of woo.

Good advice, euthman!”
Why Do the Smartest Women Have the Toughest Time Dating?

Why Do the Smartest Women Have the Toughest Time Dating?

Commented Dec 08, 2009 at 16:18:13 in Living

“What I suspect is actually happening is that you are articulating perfectly what you expect of him, and he complies cheerfully after a scripted "discussion."

It has sure worked for me. 26 years of marriage, and I'm the happiest man alive! ;)”

tb92 replied on Dec 08, 2009 at 16:44:46

“Well, if his script involves a long, convoluted intellectual debate and the occasional assertion that women are crazy, you might be right. I think it's just a matter of people who want to work things out more than they want to be the "winner". But your way would work, too. Congrats to you and your wife.”
Why Do the Smartest Women Have the Toughest Time Dating?

Why Do the Smartest Women Have the Toughest Time Dating?

Commented Dec 08, 2009 at 10:26:35 in Living

“I think many of these women simply have too many filters in place. They want a smart guy, which is fine, but then he also has to be tall, good-looking, witty, charming, financially secure, and professionally well-respected. Good luck with that, gals!”

Alexandre Laudet replied on Dec 08, 2009 at 11:08:08

“AND MONOGAMOUS!”

MsCuda replied on Dec 08, 2009 at 10:47:27

“I've found that people can cross a lot of social differences like appearance, minor differences in financial worth and actual education as long as they are similar in emotional development and basic intellect.

While someone who isn't curious about the things life has to offer won't interest an intelligent person for long, someone who is incredibly intelligent and educated at all the "best" universities won't be attractive if they're emotionally immature.

It's always been my opinion that many intelligent, kind, responsible men are passed on by some otherwise smart women because they don't fit some romance novel paradigm of the perfect mate. (It's ok by me--their loss was my gain!)”
huffingtonpost entry

How to Make Peace With Obama's Speech

Commented Dec 06, 2009 at 19:38:46 in World

“I don't see there is any distinct strategy for victory. There is no evidence that Afghanistan is capable of building and sustaining an Enlightenment-inspired democracy with guaranteed civil liberties. The last election was flagrantly corrupted. As for women's rights, even under the current "friendly" regime, it is not illegal for a husband to rape his wife. Either we pull out now, with Afghanistan suffering the consequences, or we pull out later, with Afghanistan suffering the consequences, _and_ us suffering more dead and maimed service personnel, not to mention an even more catastrophic level of debt.

Don't put good money after bad. Pull out now.”
Struggling For The Soul Of Religion: Why The Parliament Of The World's Religions Matters

Struggling For The Soul Of Religion: Why The Parliament Of The World's Religions Matters

Commented Dec 05, 2009 at 14:22:06 in Living

“"Liberal" and "moderate" apologists point out that most religions do promote a humanist agenda, and this is a good thing. The problem is that those same religions also promote varying degrees of intolerance, exclusivity, and divisiveness that are at odds with humanist principles. Apologists tend to sweep those under the rug. Instead of defending religions as engines of humanism, why not just promote humanism itself and keep religion out of it? Or, are we so depraved a species that we must nurture a fear of some vengeful supernatural being to enforce observance of the Golden Rule? I guess I just don't have that negative a view of humanity.

I like the observation by Nobel Laureate Steven Weinberg: "With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion."”
The Great Mammography Debate:

The Great Mammography Debate: "Peace of Mind" Or "Power Of Me?" What Kind Of Person Are You?

Commented Nov 25, 2009 at 08:31:03 in Living

“Look at te Board of Directors of the thermography association. Three of the four are chiropractors.”

jwander1 replied on Nov 25, 2009 at 20:54:12

“Careful, your prejudices are showing. Do you think the whole world is as close-minded about chiropractic as you apparently are?”
The Great Mammography Debate:

The Great Mammography Debate: "Peace of Mind" Or "Power Of Me?" What Kind Of Person Are You?

Commented Nov 24, 2009 at 11:05:19 in Living

“Thermography has been tested and is not sufficiently accurate to serve as a screening tool for early breast cancer. It is now being promoted mostly by quacks.”

jwander1 replied on Nov 24, 2009 at 17:22:07

“Detecting early breast tumour by finite element thermal analysis. Lin QY, Yang HQ, Xie SS, Wang YH, Ye Z, Chen SQ. J Med Eng Technol. 2009;33(4):274-80.

Thermography has been proved to be an effective technique for indicating breast disease abnormalities or risks. However, the abnormalities might not express clearly due to various factors, such as when a small tumour is located in a deep region, or environmental influences that make breast disease difficult to find. This study aims to solve these problems for early detection of breast tumour. A three-dimensional breast model is presented to investigate the relationship between an embedded tumour and the surface temperature distribution. Then a subtraction technique is used to enhance the thermal signature of breast tumour. The surface thermal characteristics of a small tumour even in a deep region could be found easily by this method. It was also found that the surface thermal characteristics of tumour obscured due to environmental cooling effect can be clearly displayed. The results are very useful for analysing breast thermograms.”
Hormone Therapy: Synthetic Progestins Are Not The Same As Progesterone

Hormone Therapy: Synthetic Progestins Are Not The Same As Progesterone

Commented Nov 24, 2009 at 10:27:57 in Living

“Sorry, but the claim that "natural" progesterone is somehow safer than a synthetic analogue has never been substantiated, nor is there any theoretical reason to believe it will be. Further, it is unlikely that various forms of hormone replacement therapy (natural vs. "bio-identical" vs. synthetic) will be tested against each other, because it would be unethical to run a study with proper control groups when the dangers of HRT have already been shown.

Women who wish to avoid the demonstrated risks of HRT should not be misled to believe that one form of estrogen or progesterone is safer than another, whether natural or synthetic.”

jwander1 replied on Nov 24, 2009 at 16:12:17

“Euthman is a long-time denier that anything alternative or natural could be effective. For all his touting of his medical credentials, he never looks at the evidence (and there is often plenty of it). He'd rather stick with the biased opinions he learned in medical school. His opinions aren't worth bothering about.”

MossyOak replied on Nov 24, 2009 at 14:50:03

“Well, thanks so much for saving us all the time to bother with pesky research and discussion. Which drug company do you work for?”

NoSillyName replied on Nov 24, 2009 at 10:51:01

“Well, that settles that!!”
huffingtonpost entry

A Question of Harm -- The Legacy of Vaccination

Commented Nov 22, 2009 at 06:33:00 in Living

“Fanned!”
huffingtonpost entry

A Mammogram DIDN'T Save My Life

Commented Nov 20, 2009 at 06:14:14 in Living

“If you read the _Cancer_ article, the first thing mentioned is that thermography is not used for diagnosis because of "its generally low accuracy." The authors were investigating its use for assessing prognosis in patients who are already known to have breast cancer. You were touting it as a diagnostic substitute for mammography, which it most certainly is not.”

RMankovitz replied on Nov 20, 2009 at 12:41:27

“Nowhere did I even suggest that thermography be substituted for mammography. In fact, I presented a fair and balanced list of references to show its strengths and weaknesses. On the other hand, your narrow characterization of the technology indicates a preconceived bias against new technology in a field in which you clearly have no background (digital IR imaging). Here is what those in the field have to say in the matter:

Use of digital infrared imaging in enhanced breast cancer detection and monitoring of the clinical response to treatment, Arena, F. Barone, C. DiCicco, T. , Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2003. Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE 2003

Infrared imaging of the breast has been primarily hampered by the many factors inherent in its technology. With the use of computer automated digital infrared technology, problems with subjectivity, reproducibility and spatial localization have been eliminated. The digital infrared imaging (DII) discussed herein has 99% detection sensitivity in a study of 109 tissue proven cases of breast cancer. Its sensitivity has been successfully demonstrated in lesions as small as 4 mm. Additionally, DII, can now be used in the clinical monitoring of localized breast cancer to access therapeutic response. In conjunction with mammography and ultrasound, DII can be utilized in the early detection of breast cancer.”
huffingtonpost entry

A Mammogram DIDN'T Save My Life

Commented Nov 19, 2009 at 12:05:04 in Living

“As a practicing pathologist, I have had long experience with diagnosis of breast disease, and I had never heard of thermography being useful in the clinical arena. When I looked at the cited Website, I saw that of the 4 board members of IACT, 3 are chiropractors. Legitimate chiropractic has nothing to do with breast disease. So, I would suggest avoiding breast thermography until such time as actual breast experts validate it.”

RMankovitz replied on Nov 19, 2009 at 14:00:54

“Here are a few spoon-fed peer-reviewed studies. As I indicated in my previous post, use Google Scholar to search: breast thermography .

Head JF, Wang F, Elliott RL: Breast thermography is a noninvasive prognostic procedure that predicts tumor growth rate in breast cancer patients. Ann N Y Acad Sci 698:153-158,1993.

Sterns EE, Zee B, Sen Gupta J, and Saunders FW. Thermography: Its relation to pathologic characteristics, vascularity, proliferative rate and survival of patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. Cancer 77:1324-8, 1996.

Head JF, Elliott RL: Breast Thermography. Cancer 79:186-8,1995.

Anbar M: Breast Cancer. In: Quantitative Dynamic Telethermometry in Medical Diagnosis and Management. CRC Press, Ann Arbor, Mich, pp.84-94, 1994.

Keyserlingk JR, Ahlgren, PD, Yu E and Belliveau N: Infrared imaging of the breast: Initial reappraisal using high-resolution digital technology in 100 successive cases of Stage I and II breast cancer. The Breast Journal (4):245-251,1998.

Hobbins, W.: Abnormal Thermogram -- Significance in Breast Cancer. RIR 12: 337-343, 1987

Useki H: Evaluation of the thermographic diagnosis of breast disease: relation of thermographic findings and pathologic findings of cancer growth. Nippon Gan Chiryo Gakkai Shi 23: 2687-2695, 1988.

Nyirjesy, I., Ayme, Y., et al: Clinical Evaluation, Mammography, and Thermography in the Diagnosis of Breast Carcinoma. Thermology 1:170-173, 1986

Haberman J: An overview of breast thermography in the United States: In: Margaret Abernathy, Sumio Uematsu (Eds): Medical Thermography. American Academy of Thermology, Washington, pp.218-223, 1986.”
huffingtonpost entry

Vaccination: A Conversation Worth Having

Commented Nov 16, 2009 at 13:34:28 in Living

“Fanned”
huffingtonpost entry

Vaccination: A Conversation Worth Having

Commented Nov 16, 2009 at 13:33:21 in Living

“[cricket, cricket]”

ddanimal replied on Nov 16, 2009 at 13:46:19

“Studies and citations were provided. Next!”
huffingtonpost entry

Vaccination: A Conversation Worth Having

Commented Nov 16, 2009 at 11:50:26 in Living

“In addition to what all the other rationalists have stated in defense of vaccines, I would like to point out that there is no basis to Bill's implied argument that we can somehow boost our immune systems (by lifestyle choices and control of environmental pollutants) to the extent that vaccines would not be necessary. Unfortunately, this his a vague generalization that is not backed up by empirical science. Serious viral and bacterial infections were around long before there was junk food, tobacco, and industrial pollution. There is no evidence that control of these factors would result in sufficient immunity to render us invulnerable to infections.

I am a huge Bill Maher fan. I even went to see him live in Boston earlier this year. However, he has taken a very disappointing turn by hitching his wagon to the anti-vax movement.”

Vinkaye replied on Nov 16, 2009 at 12:38:34

“Why is it when a person suggests that everyone evaluate vaccinations on an individual basis, they are labeled "anti-vax"? We need to gain a more mature perspective on vaccinations in this country, so that we might ask the questions that need to be asked, and make informed decisions.”

MontanaSouth replied on Nov 16, 2009 at 12:35:35

“Your point is very valid. There are different types of pathogens that vary in virulence. A healthy lifestyle, nutrition, good environment can make one less suseptible to pathogens that are opportunists. These pathogens cause disease in compromised hosts. There are pathogens that cause disease in healthy hosts. In these cases, the virulence depends on the morbidity/mortality rate. For instance. If you are bitten by a rabid animal and develop the disease, your chances of dying are greater than 99%. Only 6 people have ever been know to survive the disease. So, taking the post-exposure vaccination would be a very wise choice, even with the very low chance of developing Guillain-Barre syndrome (which can be treated and resolve). Many of the encephalitis viruses like West Nile Virus have a mortality rate of about 5%. Wedon't see routine vaccination for these two diseases, not because they are not serious but because of the manner in which they are spread. There are effective ways of preventing exposure. With rabies, we vaccinate our dogs and cats (sometimes horses) to prevent exposure. With WNV, we control exposure to mosquitoes. With highly contagious diseases with a significant mortality rate, such as influenza, we need to vaccinate the population to decrease the spread of the disease. The virus can cause disease in healthy people, but it is more severe in any person with compromised health. So vaccination is stratified to protect the young, and aged.”

ddanimal replied on Nov 16, 2009 at 12:24:55

“You are wrong-both in your statements and logic.

Many nutrients and diet modifications have been proven to control or prevent infectious diseases. Vitamins D and C are but two examples. D and C are very effective for preventing and stopping the flu.

Are they 100% effective? No, of course not, but...

Vaccines dont provide "invulnerability" either. And vaccines have many dangerous side effects that vitamins D and C do not.”

ouroborous replied on Nov 16, 2009 at 12:06:15

“And, to add to your point (which I agree with), we can only boost our immune systems against pathogens we've *been exposed to* (which is, incidentally, the WHOLE POINT of vaccines). Let's leave out for the moment the fact that many of the most dangerous viruses mutate far faster than our immune system can keep up (which is why we have a *seasonal* flu vaccine). Let's just consider that there is ONE virus to get immunity to, not a whole panoply of ever-mutating bad guys.

So, logically, the best way to "boost our immune system" against HIV -- if you buy Bill's "do it the natural way" argument -- would be to trade blood with an infected person. Who's going to volunteer for that? Anyone?

Me, I prefer that they just keep working on a vaccine. I much prefer a 0.0001% chance of a serious vaccine-related complication to a 0.5-1.0% chance of dying from the flu. To anyone with the ability to do basic math, the odds are much better in favor of vaccines.”
Top Autism Panel Backs Research Objectives Mentioning Vaccines -- Dueling Press Releases Ensue

Top Autism Panel Backs Research Objectives Mentioning Vaccines -- Dueling Press Releases Ensue

Commented Nov 14, 2009 at 01:17:03 in Living

“Vaccines have been studied out the wazoo, and there is no link between vaccines and autism. More research in this area would simply be putting good money after bad.”

RaisingAwareness replied on Nov 24, 2009 at 01:39:14

“What do you say to all those parents who say their kids were progressing normally up until they got a vaccine shot?

What do you have to say to my friend whose child was walking by 6 months, speaking 2 languages by 2, then after another round of vaccines couldn't walk and talk?”

Doybia replied on Nov 14, 2009 at 23:23:02

“Don't look, don't find. They must have been looking up the wrong wazoo. Or as they say in Missouri, parents whose children regress after vaccines are up s**t creek without a paddle...

because there is no link...

so it is all coincidence or else delusion”

Ergon replied on Nov 14, 2009 at 13:19:56

“And kids still die within 48 hours of receiving the multi-dose shots. What'll you believe, an 'expert' who conducts studies, or your own lying eyes?”

J Mac replied on Nov 14, 2009 at 09:21:34

“Yeah, except for one problem. None of the current studies factor in the use of anti-pyretics, such as Tylenol.”

CraigWilloughby replied on Nov 14, 2009 at 05:24:49

“One vaccine; one ingredient.

How many vaccines are there?”
The Epidemic Of 'Medical Child Abuse' And What Can Be Done

The Epidemic Of 'Medical Child Abuse' And What Can Be Done

Commented Nov 02, 2009 at 00:32:38 in Living

“Fanned.”
The Epidemic Of 'Medical Child Abuse' And What Can Be Done

The Epidemic Of 'Medical Child Abuse' And What Can Be Done

Commented Nov 01, 2009 at 19:39:39 in Living

“Vaccines are based on the immune response, which is demonstrable and measurable. Homeopathic preparations are too dilute to stimulate an immune response, so there is none. Even those who sell homeopathic preparations make no claim that they cause an immune response. Bottom line: vaccines and homeopathy have nothing in common.”
The Epidemic Of 'Medical Child Abuse' And What Can Be Done

The Epidemic Of 'Medical Child Abuse' And What Can Be Done

Commented Nov 01, 2009 at 16:19:33 in Living

“The safest treatment is no treatment at all, which of course is what homeopathy is.”

MNmommy replied on Nov 01, 2009 at 19:28:43

“::chuckle::

Shame that most didn't your post and it's message.”

David Howe replied on Nov 01, 2009 at 16:56:55

“Where did you get the idea that "no treatment" is safe? Is that the right way to treat Strep or Leukemia? How about bee venom allergies? I agree, however, that homeopathy is not treatment.”

Star2000dancer replied on Nov 01, 2009 at 16:40:12

“Born poor, with no health care, a dad & aunt who didn't even take aspirin, my dad an elite high diver, & myself a healthy athlete we didn't use drugs. My dad was still doing one anda halfswith me off a 40 foot bridge into a 20 mile current everyday at 65 years old.
We allgot deathly ill when drugs were introduced into our systems. I feel lucky to have been born poor so I seldom saw a doctor. Side effects have almost killed me and no one cares. There's no recourse. I also have experienced all and more of what they're calling myths. My mom's dead because of the lies.”

persimmon8 replied on Nov 01, 2009 at 16:39:51

“And you have examined this profoundly and found it to be true!!!

Why do I not believe you?”

NilesCrane replied on Nov 01, 2009 at 16:31:32

“and for kids with cancer......death! homeopathy only makes you think your doing better but in reality whatever medical issue you have only gets worse.”
huffingtonpost entry

Can You Change the Past?

Commented Oct 27, 2009 at 00:32:55 in Living

“Nice concise explanation. Thanks!”
A Guide For The Perplexed On Vaccinations: What The Coffee Jitters Tell Us

A Guide For The Perplexed On Vaccinations: What The Coffee Jitters Tell Us

Commented Oct 24, 2009 at 19:35:53 in Living

“actually, not at all”

mofmars333 replied on Oct 25, 2009 at 03:16:52

“lol. Yeah, right!”
A Guide For The Perplexed On Vaccinations: What The Coffee Jitters Tell Us

A Guide For The Perplexed On Vaccinations: What The Coffee Jitters Tell Us

Commented Oct 24, 2009 at 19:34:36 in Living

“In summary: assertions, generalizations, and speculation... and 100% evidence-free!”

cable1977 replied on Oct 25, 2009 at 00:07:19

“The anti-vaccination motto. They should make T-shirts...or coffee mugs.”
huffingtonpost entry

Mr. President, Will You Lead Us to Greatness in Space?

Commented Oct 22, 2009 at 13:13:39 in Technology

“As a huge fan of space science since Sputnik/Explorer days, I love to follow the adventures of humans in space. Nevertheless, at this time there is simply no useful objective for manned space flight. Yes, I do want NASA to continue and be generously funded, but we will get much, much more bang for the buck from robotic and astronomical projects. Only by those means will we determine what (if anything) is out there worth exploring through manned missions.”

SonofLiberty1 replied on Oct 22, 2009 at 13:29:42

“And my question as always is the following:

DO YOU HAVE A JOB?”
Women Are Unhappy? And You're Surprised?

Women Are Unhappy? And You're Surprised?

Commented Oct 13, 2009 at 05:39:27 in Living

“As a health care worker since age 16, I have worked in a predominantly female environment for over 40 years. Yes, women (at least those who work outside the home, which are the only ones I have been around) are unhappy now, but they are no more unhappy than they were in 1968. I think the root problem is that they hold themselves to an impossible standard. They hold themselves to perfection on the home front and feel that any imperfection in housekeeping and child rearing reflects badly on them and them alone. A woman may start a domestic relationship with a man who wants to pitch in and do his share of housework, but his efforts are never up to her standard. She ends up complaining about his performance and/or redoing the task. Eventually he gets the message and bows out, leaving her to stew in her own frustrations.

That's bad enough, but now she has the added burden of a full-time job outside the home, where she is held to perfection by her bosses there. It's simply impossible to be perfect in both realms, and the failure to meet her own goals leads to a chronic state of unhappiness.”

mrportman replied on Oct 13, 2009 at 13:24:22

“Love your post, especially when you state, "I think the root problem is that they hold themselves to an impossible standard." You hit the nail on the head.”
Bill Maher is wrong about the swine flu

Bill Maher is wrong about the swine flu

Commented Oct 12, 2009 at 06:57:42 in Politics

“Indeed. Good comparison!”

Nealo replied on Oct 13, 2009 at 11:17:27

“I am a huge Bill Maher fan and agree with him on many things. He was dead wrong here.

Just last week in his New Rules on climate change, Maher berated congressmen for not deferring to the PhD's and other assorted climate experts when it came to global warming. Now here he is doing exactly what he decried last week.

The experts (including my wife a PhD in virology and immunology) know better than Bill Maher. Get the shot.”
next
1 - 25 of 166