greenwitch's Comments (35)
The Serena Williams "Incident" Isn't About Racial Bias, But It Is About Bias
Commented Sep 15, 2009 at 23:08:56 in Living
“Rhino, regarding my "phobia".. .get a clue. I was talking about the disconnect between Serena's outburst and her press conference. There's too much real racism in the world for you to try to manufacture it.
/:[”
/:[”
The Serena Williams "Incident" Isn't About Racial Bias, But It Is About Bias
Commented Sep 15, 2009 at 19:25:46 in Living
“I dunno...No vak Djokovic is also considered an "outsider. " His parents behaved boorishly and have made less-than- thoughtful comments; he was shunned by other players for his impersonations of them, even though fans were delighted by his antics; he was booed by the NY fans last year when he took exception to Andy Roddick's jibes about his fitness. He got several bad calls in his match with Fed on Sunday. Sound familiar? (BTW, he's from Serbia.) Outsider status does not have to be based on race, and the Williams sisters broke the norm by refusing to play junior tournaments. Richard Williams spoke his mind and was considered arrogant, while, IIRC, Oracene has always been gracious and well liked. Tennis is a cliquish sport, as are most sports played at a country club, and those that refuse to "toe the line" get stepped on. That said, Serena and Venus have more than "paid their dues" in the sport, have a huge fan base and are loved all over the world.”
The Serena Williams "Incident" Isn't About Racial Bias, But It Is About Bias
Commented Sep 15, 2009 at 19:00:33 in Living
“Maybe because Federer just used profanity---he didn't threaten to shove a tennis ball down the ump's throat. See the difference?”
The Serena Williams "Incident" Isn't About Racial Bias, But It Is About Bias
Commented Sep 15, 2009 at 18:54:58 in Living
“I think she meant that the camera did not have a shot on the line, hence the angles of the replays were inconclusive.”
The Serena Williams "Incident" Isn't About Racial Bias, But It Is About Bias
Commented Sep 14, 2009 at 20:19:26 in Living
“No, of course not, line judges watch all the lines, hence the name "line judges." They are rotated around and off the court during the match. In this case, during the serve, that linesperson's job was to watch for foot faults. I was being a bit sarcastic about taking away the judge when a match gets tight, but my point was why bother assigning a person to make a foot fault call if you don't want them to make the call as they see it?”
The Serena Williams "Incident" Isn't About Racial Bias, But It Is About Bias
Commented Sep 14, 2009 at 16:40:28 in Living
“I'm surprised she was able to play in the doubles championship match. Her arm must've hurt from all that twisting.”
The Serena Williams "Incident" Isn't About Racial Bias, But It Is About Bias
Commented Sep 14, 2009 at 16:36:36 in Living
“Thank you. Couldn't agree with you more. Excusing and even rewarding bad behavior is becoming the norm lately. Not good.”
The Serena Williams "Incident" Isn't About Racial Bias, But It Is About Bias
Commented Sep 14, 2009 at 16:33:21 in Living
“"She had every right to be angry. And many of those whom want her 'banned' would have been livid also at that crucial time in the match People get upset. You don't find this call for 'banning' when they clear the benches in pro baseball or even hockey."
Perhaps, but many bench-clearing brawls lead to suspensions.
"People have a right to express themselves ."
People do not have the right to threaten and menace other people. It's called assault.
"What I want to know is if the linesperson is going to be investigated? Who said she didn't have a bet on the game with control of the outcome in her hands. I'm just saying."
You're "just saying" BS. How convenient for the linesperson that Serena ended up having to serve to stay in the match and hitting two easy balls into the net to be down 15-30 and faced with a second serve. "Here's my chance to make beaucoup bucks!" the linesperson thought. Yeah, right. The linesperson was assigned to call foot faults and she thought she saw one so she called it. That's her job. If foot faults shouldn't be called on "important points," then take away the foot fault line judge when the match gets tight.”
Perhaps, but many bench-clearing brawls lead to suspensions.
"People have a right to express themselves
People do not have the right to threaten and menace other people. It's called assault.
"What I want to know is if the linesperson is going to be investigated? Who said she didn't have a bet on the game with control of the outcome in her hands. I'm just saying."
You're "just saying" BS. How convenient for the linesperson that Serena ended up having to serve to stay in the match and hitting two easy balls into the net to be down 15-30 and faced with a second serve. "Here's my chance to make beaucoup bucks!" the linesperson thought. Yeah, right. The linesperson was assigned to call foot faults and she thought she saw one so she called it. That's her job. If foot faults shouldn't be called on "important points," then take away the foot fault line judge when the match gets tight.”
MelRoy replied on Sep 14, 2009 at 18:05:12
“You think line judges are just there to look for foot faults?”
The Serena Williams "Incident" Isn't About Racial Bias, But It Is About Bias
Commented Sep 14, 2009 at 15:54:43 in Living
“2) I don't think it is fair to lump the Williams sisters together. Throughout the years, Venus has showed more respect to her opponents on and off the court than Serena, and is the better-liked player in the locker room. Serena, on the other hand, is quirky, sometimes charming, other times dismissive. Her behavior on court Saturday, in my opinion, warranted a suspension, and I'm sorry the U.S. Open caved to financial concerns and allowed her back on court two days later. The profanity part did not upset me, as it was an odd call on an important point, but I thought the menace of Serena's tIrade was inexcusable. Technically, it was an assault, and if she were outside a bar instead of on a tennis court she might have been arrested. Her nonchalance in the press conference ("I've moved on") smacked of narcissism and denial. Yes, her T-shirts and interviews are funny, but the excerpts from her book portray someone who marvels at how well she can manipulate people and get away with it. All tennis players have personality issues, some more lovable than others, but every fan shows bias by preferring one player over another. The venom spewed by Serena, and her shrugging dismissal of it in the press conference, scared me. I hope she's urged to take a good look at herself and her behavior, but a slap on the wrist from the USTA does nothing to help. It's a lose-lose for everybody.”
The Serena Williams "Incident" Isn't About Racial Bias, But It Is About Bias
Commented Sep 14, 2009 at 15:45:18 in Living
“I have to disagree with you, Keli, especially on two points:
1) Granted, foot faults are a pain for everyone (including recreational players), and calling them is rather archaic in the present game, as so few players come to net behind their serves. However, there is a line judge whose job is to call foot faults, and if she saw Serena's foot touch the line before she hit the serve, her responsibility was to call a fault. If she shouldn't have called a foot fault on such an important point, why was she even out there? Perhaps tennis officials should add a special foot fault line six inches into the court from the baseline, so that only egregious ones will be called. I've seen a couple of angles of the fateful serve, and I think it's inconclusive from either angle. You need a shot from the linesperson's perspective, which extends from the line itself. Either do away with foot faults or add a camera and a challenge system, so bad foot fault calls can be reversed and outbursts avoided.
Point 2 to follow...”
1) Granted, foot faults are a pain for everyone (including recreational players), and calling them is rather archaic in the present game, as so few players come to net behind their serves. However, there is a line judge whose job is to call foot faults, and if she saw Serena's foot touch the line before she hit the serve, her responsibility was to call a fault. If she shouldn't have called a foot fault on such an important point, why was she even out there? Perhaps tennis officials should add a special foot fault line six inches into the court from the baseline, so that only egregious ones will be called. I've seen a couple of angles of the fateful serve, and I think it's inconclusive from either angle. You need a shot from the linesperson's perspective, which extends from the line itself. Either do away with foot faults or add a camera and a challenge system, so bad foot fault calls can be reversed and outbursts avoided.
Point 2 to follow...”
We Know the World and We Support Obama
Commented Oct 27, 2008 at 00:17:22 in Politics
“This is really impressive. Thank you!”
Waiting for Nov. 4th
Commented Oct 23, 2008 at 01:16:00 in Politics
“Send us the good mojo! We're really trying.”
October Surprise Update: What McCain May Be Planning and What Obama Can Do to Ruin It
Commented Oct 18, 2008 at 16:44:27 in Politics
“According to Christiane Amanpour, bin Laden is living in a villa somewhere, probably Pakistan. Maybe the U.S. should try to deliver a pizza.”
OldDiver replied on Oct 18, 2008 at 21:28:51
“If we call Domino's Pizza we could capture him in 30 minutes or less.”
McCain Responds to "Arab" Epithet at Rally: "Obama a Decent Family Man"
Commented Oct 14, 2008 at 21:46:19 in Home
“I wonder what she thinks of the guy (Neel Kashkari) who's running the bailout. Arab terrorist, too, Gayle? Very, very, scary?? Quick, hide your money under your mattress, dear---but watch out for the cat hair and bedbugs.”
Zeje replied on Oct 15, 2008 at 14:53:24
“Interesting connection.”
McCain Responds to "Arab" Epithet at Rally: "Obama a Decent Family Man"
Commented Oct 14, 2008 at 21:41:35 in Home
“Sorry to hear that. Some people are just impossibly clueless. I recommend you bless him on his path and get far, far out of his way.”
McCain Responds to "Arab" Epithet at Rally: "Obama a Decent Family Man"
Commented Oct 14, 2008 at 21:36:25 in Home
“You're not being fair to the cats...”
Palin Gives Major 'Interview' (To Hometown Paper): Asked About Book Banning and Rape Kits -- Still Claims She Cancelled Bridge
Commented Sep 30, 2008 at 21:37:08 in Politics
“She doesn't mention that the McCain health insurance plan takes away the tax deduction that businesses get for providing health insurance for their employees. That leaves no incentive for businesses to provide health insurance, and it takes away the group rates that allow all employees to be covered regardless of health problems and pre-existing conditions. Getting an individual policy is difficult and expensive, especially for older people.”
Shabba replied on Sep 30, 2008 at 22:35:57
“Forget about taxing away the tax deductions for businesses. She didn't mention that health care provided by employers will now be a taxable benefit to employees. Obama has said "Insurance companies will have to make less profit". This is unacceptable to the Republicans.”
We Now Know Who the Next President Will Be
Commented Sep 27, 2008 at 03:23:30 in Politics
“You're right---Bob Shrum is no soothsayer.”
The Witch Hunter Anoints Sarah Palin
Commented Sep 26, 2008 at 02:10:34 in Politics
“Muthee exclaimed, "We come against the spirit of witchcraft! We come against the python spirits!" More like Monty Python spirits, if you ask me.
Sir Bedevere: There are ways of telling whether she is a witch.
Peasant 1: Are there? Oh well, tell us.
Sir Bedevere: Tell me. What do you do with witches?
Peasant 1: Burn them.
Sir Bedevere: And what do you burn, apart from witches?
Peasant 1: More witches.
Peasant 2: Wood.
Sir Bedevere: Good. Now, why do witches burn?
Peasant 3: ...because they're made of... wood?
Sir Bedevere: Good. So how do you tell whether she is made of wood?
Peasant 1: Build a bridge out of her.
Sir Bedevere: But can you not also build bridges out of stone?
Peasant 1: Oh yeah.
Sir Bedevere: Does wood sink in water?
Peasant 1: No, no, it floats!... It floats! Throw her into the pond!
Sir Bedevere: No, no. What else floats in water?
Peasant 1: Bread.
Peasant 2: Apples.
Peasant 3: Very small rocks.
Peasant 1: Cider.
Peasant 2: Gravy.
Peasant 3: Cherries.
Peasant 1: Mud.
Peasant 2: Churches.
Peasant 3: Lead! Lead!
King Arthur: A Duck.
Sir Bedevere: ...Exactly . So, logically. ..
Peasant 1: If she weighed the same as a duck... she's made of wood.
Sir Bedevere: And therefore. ..
Peasant 2: ...A witch!”
Sir Bedevere: There are ways of telling whether she is a witch.
Peasant 1: Are there? Oh well, tell us.
Sir Bedevere: Tell me. What do you do with witches?
Peasant 1: Burn them.
Sir Bedevere: And what do you burn, apart from witches?
Peasant 1: More witches.
Peasant 2: Wood.
Sir Bedevere: Good. Now, why do witches burn?
Peasant 3: ...because they're made of... wood?
Sir Bedevere: Good. So how do you tell whether she is made of wood?
Peasant 1: Build a bridge out of her.
Sir Bedevere: But can you not also build bridges out of stone?
Peasant 1: Oh yeah.
Sir Bedevere: Does wood sink in water?
Peasant 1: No, no, it floats!... It floats! Throw her into the pond!
Sir Bedevere: No, no. What else floats in water?
Peasant 1: Bread.
Peasant 2: Apples.
Peasant 3: Very small rocks.
Peasant 1: Cider.
Peasant 2: Gravy.
Peasant 3: Cherries.
Peasant 1: Mud.
Peasant 2: Churches.
Peasant 3: Lead! Lead!
King Arthur: A Duck.
Sir Bedevere: ...Exactly
Peasant 1: If she weighed the same as a duck... she's made of wood.
Sir Bedevere: And therefore.
Peasant 2: ...A witch!”
The Power of Palin
Commented Sep 22, 2008 at 21:42:39 in Politics
“Yeah, it was fun. Poor Thomas Paine would be spinning in his grave, if he'd had one.”
The Power of Palin
Commented Sep 22, 2008 at 21:32:12 in Politics
“Oh really, Bill? Nobody's forcing Scarah to have an abortion or take the pill, but she wants to take those options away from us. So that "freedom of choice" doesn't go both ways, and the zealotry and intolerance falls squarely on Palin's side of the coin. Don't blame us for fighting the hell back---we refuse to put up with their BS.”
billkarwin replied on Sep 23, 2008 at 16:49:08
“I'm strongly Pro-Choice, and I think conservative women need to give up that issue and accept that women's right to choose is the only acceptable outcome on that issue. I was not saying that progressive women must conform to conservative values. I don't believe Ms. Walker is advocating that either.
But there are other women's issues besides abortion, that progressives and conservatives should come together on. See this video of Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden talking about the Democratic Party's position and achievement on a whole range of women's issues:
http://www .youtube.c om/watch?v =0h1pLEqI3 Pw
But there's no opportunity for common ground on other issues if women continue to be at each other's throats over the abortion issue.
What I understood from Ms. Walker's article is that it's unfair and intolerant for women leaders to try to silence Ms. Walker for saying something as innocuous as "we should find common ground." Yeesh!”
But there are other women's issues besides abortion, that progressives and conservatives should come together on. See this video of Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden talking about the Democratic Party's position and achievement on a whole range of women's issues:
http://www
But there's no opportunity for common ground on other issues if women continue to be at each other's throats over the abortion issue.
What I understood from Ms. Walker's article is that it's unfair and intolerant for women leaders to try to silence Ms. Walker for saying something as innocuous as "we should find common ground." Yeesh!”
The Power of Palin
Commented Sep 22, 2008 at 21:19:07 in Politics
“What a joke. Palin is Bush in a skirt. And totally unqualified. But, dream on, Judy.”
Palin's Pastor: God "Is Gonna Strike Out His Hand Against" America
Commented Sep 06, 2008 at 19:05:23 in Politics
“God doesn't care. But we should.”
Journey To The Center Of Hillary Clinton's Mind: "Why Would I Drop Out Before Barack Obama Is Assassinated?"
Commented May 24, 2008 at 19:46:23 in Politics
“Umm...it was December 27, 2007. But thanks for playing our game.”
caral replied on May 25, 2008 at 01:26:49
“Yes, you're right about the date - my mistake(and I hate to make them).
However, it doesn't change the fact that a person running for elective office on the world stage was assassinated and she was a woman.”
However, it doesn't change the fact that a person running for elective office on the world stage was assassinated and she was a woman.”


