HuffPost Social News

hu.man's Comments (243)

View Comments:   Sort:
next
1 - 25 of 243
Arianna Discusses Health Reform, State Of The Nation: 'The Lobbyists Are Winning'

Arianna Discusses Health Reform, State Of The Nation: 'The Lobbyists Are Winning'

Commented Dec 17, 2009 at 16:58:07 in Politics

“There is one topic on health care reform that is almost never addressed. America is an aging nation and as a result we are facing mounting health care costs. All indications are that we will continue to age as a nation without any abatement. There is no national policy to address this issue which can undermine our ability to maintain a positive global competitive posture in years to come.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0a/Median_age.png

The countries who are in worse shape in this regard are almost all exclusively first world industrial nations such as Japan and Canada. The more serious issue to address here is one of deteriorating demographics which is part of the malady of the modern age we live in silently chewing away at the foundation of our lives.”

HisPetGoat replied on Dec 17, 2009 at 17:12:54

“The civilized nations have medians equal to or greater than ours. It's actually a good thing and a step toward sustainability. We only need to pursue social policies appropriate to the maturation of our population.”
huffingtonpost entry

Can the Obama White House Course-Correct in Time to Avoid Hitting the 2010 Iceberg?

Commented Dec 14, 2009 at 19:32:30 in Politics

“11 months from now, the voters will be cutting into the Democratic majority in the congress. Obama, on the other hand, will maintain a high level of popularity and more than likely will achieve a Teflon-like status over time like Reagan.

Even the big blunder everyone discounted, the second Bush, managed to pull two terms out of the hat. Obama will and can do better than Bush. The more progressively oriented part of Obama's agenda will be implemented in the latter half of his first term at the earliest and the second term at the latest.

I began this cycle being a Hillary Clinton supporter and quickly switched to Obama. He continued to amaze me with his political acumen during the campaign and beyond (i.e. appointing Hillary to be Secretary of State). I don't believe 11 months into his term he has suddenly dumb down and started making asinine decisions.”

NickGranite replied on Dec 14, 2009 at 20:09:49

“The progressive items on his list won't be implemented in the latter half of his first term or 2nd term without majorities in Congress. He's having a devil of a time doing it with majorities now.”
huffingtonpost entry

A Tale of Two Obamas

Commented Dec 07, 2009 at 18:26:46 in Politics

“I think the most important question to ask now is how can we affect fundamental reform in the current atmosphere which is ripe to accept bold new ideas in the face of a serious crisis we have been going through?

This debate is valid and timely because as we all know, unless we are in a serious pickle, no one wants to change anything. From the standpoint what may be the most fundamental change that can directly address the root cause of the current crisis nothing is more urgent than bringing the Federal Reserve Bank under greater level of accountability for its actions.

Arguably, the current central banking system has equal or more power to the other three branches of the government and does not fall within a clear purview the established branches do. Congress needs to form a committee to affect fundamental changes in the Fed, perhaps even to include an amendment to the constitution that clearly outlines the line authority that emanates from this crucial institution.

Some changes could be that instead of having a Fed chairman that solely determines the direction of the monetary policy in this country, it could be decided by a panel of say 9 Fed governors like the Supreme Court. The concentration of unchecked power is alarming and troublesome. This issue needs to be addressed in an urgent manner if we are to not repeat the current scenario of flops, asset bubbles and bailouts again.”
The Afghanistan Parenthesis [Updated]

The Afghanistan Parenthesis [Updated]

Commented Dec 02, 2009 at 17:41:00 in World

“America schooling in Middle East:

Grade 1: Khomeini schools Americans on how their vast arsenal of power is useless against a popular uprising in Iran.

Grade 2: Saddam schools Americans into helping him in the war against Iran by providing him with critical satellite intelligence to push back the Iranian advance and avoid certain defeat.

Grade 3: Saddam schools Americans by invading neighboring Kuwait demonstrating his total disregard for regional security and American interests in the Middle East.

Grade 4: Saddam schools Americans in pouring billions of dollars into the Gulf War to drive him out of Kuwait which is something that could have been handled through negotiations.

Grade 5: Saddam schools Americans by staying in power after he was defeated in the Gulf War. CIA predicted that he was going to fall through a popular uprising.

Grade 6: Bin Laden schools Americans by attacking their soil on 9/11.

Grade 7: Americans respond to 9/11 by invading Iraq and overthrowing Saddam. Iraqis school Americans by bogging them down in a 6 year old insurgency. Many American lives are lost and billions are spent in Iraq with little to show for it.

Grade 8: Americans also respond to 9/11 by putting troops into Afghanistan. Once again Americans are again being schooled by Afghans by a widespread insurgency in the southern region.

Grade 9: Americans commit to more troops in Afghanistan without a clear understanding of why they are being schooled over and over in this region.”
Will The Unemployment Disaster Be Obama's Katrina?

Will The Unemployment Disaster Be Obama's Katrina?

Commented Nov 23, 2009 at 20:17:37 in Politics

“Unemployment is a lagging indicator. Many employment agencies are now reporting a rise in temporary position hiring which is traditionally an indication of a positive trend in the overall employment picture in a downturn.

All economic trends are pointing upward or flattening out. If we continue on this same curve, we will be seeing a positive trend develop in unemployment reduction. The only looming danger is a double dip recession which would be an event large enough to result in erosion of confidence in the economy and a general pull back from the business sector.

I appreciate the call for fundamental reform in the financial sector and beyond. The time to enact those reforms is when we are completely out of our current crisis. It is only when we have had enough time to reflect on the events of the past couple of years that we can enact meaningful lasting reforms. Right now, any reform may be shaped by a knee jerk reaction.

I believe that many of our problems are the result of an outdated global financial system in an increasingly globalized world. There may just be the need to pull in more closely with the other developed nations in the world and create a system that increases accountability and closes cross border loopholes that has gotten us into so much trouble as of late.”

adamNsteve replied on Nov 23, 2009 at 23:21:26

“You had me with you through the first two paragraphs, then you went right off the rails.

You advise waiting before enacting reforms? Are you serious? How much further reflection do you think we all need?

Plenty of people know where the problems are and know what to do in order to try to fix things.”

ayc replied on Nov 23, 2009 at 20:32:43

“There you go again - making sense.”

Imago replied on Nov 23, 2009 at 20:27:17

“Well done.

Fanned.”
huffingtonpost entry

Memo to Warren Buffett: Put Down the Pom-Poms and Tell Us the Truth About the Economy

Commented Nov 17, 2009 at 10:27:03 in Business

“Buffett just spent $26 billion to buy Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroad. If he believed that economy was still deteriorating then he would hold off for a better deal. He is doing what any reasonable investor would do which is to purchase assets when you are convinced that a rebound is on the way. That way you can still take advantage of the discount that is built into the price because the recovery is not fully realized yet.

Buffett is talking with his wallet which is louder than any words he might say or pom-poms he might shake. He cannot articulate his position as well as an economist would because he isn't one. But if he was cheer leading the economic recovery but at the same time off-loading his assets, then it would be clear that he was not sincere about his views.”

GardenerNorCal replied on Nov 17, 2009 at 10:52:51

“We all like to believe in Santa at Christmas time. Some of us wake up disenchanted, others with wealthy moms and dads get what's on their list.”

paulfromportland replied on Nov 17, 2009 at 10:51:20

“Most of the profits of BNSF come from hauling Chinese products to US markets from the Pacific ports. How is this helping America recover, as many of those products were once made in the USA?

Buffet may Pom-Pom, but, he showing the reality by backing the new economy of China.”

fscuttle replied on Nov 17, 2009 at 10:40:01

“I trust Warren Buffets instincts more than any economist.”
Could You Just Get Over Your Negativity About Positive Focus?

Could You Just Get Over Your Negativity About Positive Focus?

Commented Nov 16, 2009 at 10:14:53 in Living

“It is rare to hear from anyone these days who will find anything positive about the recent financial debacle that has rocked our nation. There is a lot of fingerpointing and people are generally disgusted with bankers and the titans of the financial industry.

It looks like the source of our negative focusing is the compunction to find the culprits and hang them with a noose. The only way to find the positive focus is to move away from this position and realize that the responsibility is borne by all of us and we can only collectively arrive at a workable solution that doesn't lay blame.

This is why we primarily repeat the same lesson over and over without seemingly learning anything from it. How many banking crises have we have had in the past 100 years or so? Yes there has been reforms but they never go deep enough to prevent the disease from coming back. It is a band aid approach that is destined to fail in the long run.

We find ourselves in the same situation again today.”

OtayPanky replied on Nov 16, 2009 at 20:30:50

“hu.man: The only way to find the positive focus is to move away from this position and realize that the responsibility is borne by all of us and we can only collectively arrive at a workable solution that doesn't lay blame.

===

First, many of us had nothing to do with the crisis. We lived frugally. We didn't run up our debt. We played by the rules. But when some didn't, encouraged by obscenely rich bankers and mortgages, the rest of us all experienced the effects.

It is ESSENTIAL to find the culprits in our culture of CAPITALISM GONE WILD. If we dont do that, there will be no change, and the wild boom and bust cycles will continue. For example, there are lobbyists and corporate interests responsible for repeal of the Glass-Steagal act, which (formerly) prohibited commercial banks from getting involved with speculation.

Win-win solutions only work when everyone wants them to. But our socio-economic structure is Darwinian (unlike that of some other advanced societies). Goldman Sachs and AIG win...and win big...only if there is a counter-party who loses.

Capitalism as a system is based on the profit motive, which - in humans - easily turns into the GREED motive. Unwillingness to see this potential downside and/or take remediative steps with harsh penalties included, just allows the pocket-pickers to keep on picking away.

Just think positively is NOT a good prescription for making policy.”

skatoolaki replied on Nov 16, 2009 at 16:32:01

“Exactly - thank you for sharing your thoughts; I concur.”
huffingtonpost entry

"Qum" Buy Ya

Commented Nov 14, 2009 at 03:37:43 in World

“May be repeating the "tag line" as you put it, is an egregious error on the part of the Ambassador. But Ahamadinejad's denial of Holocaust is akin to pouring salt on an open wound. Ahamadinejad demonstrates his complete disconnection from reality by making these hurtful assertions and then he claims that there is some sort of conspiracy afoot because further examination of facts regrading the Holocaust is somehow being prevented by the powers of the be here.

Ahmadinejad simply fails to understand no one wants to closely examined this truly shameful chapter of the history particularly those who were complicit in it by standing by and allowing it to happen. So Ahmadinejad's dwelling on this subject and the consequent annoyance by all those who want to move off the topic is particularly irksome because Ahmadinejad has absolutely no business injecting himself into the Holocaust debate.

Israel's anger with Iran may not be fully justified based on the "tag line" you refer to here but it is more than fully justified with Ahamdinejad's lack of sensitivity toward this stain (the Holocaust) that exists on the conscious of humanity.”

persianadvocate replied on Nov 14, 2009 at 10:52:28

“Hu.man,

I am not a violent man by any means, but if they put me in a room with Ahmadinejad, I would cut his throat from ear to ear. Why am I saying this? I don't agree with the man on many issues, including his irrelevant investigation of the Holocaust (ask any Iranian, we are either indifferent or supportive of an Israeli homeland) and his treatment of my own people, the Iranian public.

This does not give Israel causus belli. First, Ahmadinejad does not control the foreign policies of Iran. Even if he wanted to, he couldn't launch a single missile at anyone without the Ayatollah's say. Second, just because he investigated the Holocaust, does not mean that he now wants to kill all Jews. I'll remind you that Iran hosts the second biggest population of Jews who were offered monetary incentives to make the pilgramige to Israel, but refused.”
huffingtonpost entry

The Audacity to Change

Commented Nov 09, 2009 at 16:31:26 in Politics

“Obama is a pragmatic and not an ideologue. If he were to follow the path proposed here, he runs a high probability of getting into trouble with the center and having his agenda derailed for some time to come.

Obama strategy revolves around getting the center firmly into his corner and then going after problems that have been sorely neglected for the past 30 years such as urban decay and educational inequality. Rest assured that the Obamas have not forgotten their roots.

The folks occupying the White House today are as real as they come in our largely contrived society.”
Afghanistan: Obama's Fantasy Island

Afghanistan: Obama's Fantasy Island

Commented Nov 06, 2009 at 12:04:05 in World

“This situation requires a lot more emphasis on diplomacy and lot less empahsis on the military. Total disengagement is not a viable option given our previous role in training and arming the insurgency there in early 80s. That is the original sin we are now payiing for in Afghanistan.”
Obama One Year Later: The Audacity of Winning vs. The Timidity of Governing

Obama One Year Later: The Audacity of Winning vs. The Timidity of Governing

Commented Nov 03, 2009 at 19:16:36 in Politics

“Palin has the potential to become the president if independents are alienated in sufficient numbers. That is how Bush got in.”
Obama One Year Later: The Audacity of Winning vs. The Timidity of Governing

Obama One Year Later: The Audacity of Winning vs. The Timidity of Governing

Commented Nov 03, 2009 at 18:34:14 in Politics

“I don't remember anyone laughing when W took the oat of office!”

KillgoreTrout43 replied on Nov 03, 2009 at 18:43:03

“What does that have to do with Palin?”
Obama One Year Later: The Audacity of Winning vs. The Timidity of Governing

Obama One Year Later: The Audacity of Winning vs. The Timidity of Governing

Commented Nov 03, 2009 at 18:25:22 in Politics

http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0781453.html

Look at the 1994 midterm election turnout. It is THE highest midterm turnout from 1986 to 2006.”
Obama One Year Later: The Audacity of Winning vs. The Timidity of Governing

Obama One Year Later: The Audacity of Winning vs. The Timidity of Governing

Commented Nov 03, 2009 at 18:13:36 in Politics

“CORRECTION:

It was in 1994 not 1992 when Clinton got himself in a jam.”
Obama One Year Later: The Audacity of Winning vs. The Timidity of Governing

Obama One Year Later: The Audacity of Winning vs. The Timidity of Governing

Commented Nov 03, 2009 at 18:08:36 in Politics

“Undoubtedly many on the progressive front of the politics feel that Obama has been a disappointment. Nevertheless, Obama continues on his path unfazed by scathing criticism he is now facing from his left flank. This is mainly due to the fact that he clearly understands that the support that makes the difference in elections comes from the center. If he loses the support of the center, then he is toast, to put it mildly.

In 1992, the right managed to undermine Clinton's agenda by handing him one of the worst defeats in the congressional history. The right did this by absconding the center through invoking scare tactics of the dangers of government overreach which is what the center buys into readily (hence the fear mongering about the public option on the health care reform from the right).

I believe Obama is working on an 8 year plan. Anything else would be short-sighted and fool hearty. That means going slow and taking the center along with you in every election cycle. As for the left, the back stop is Sarah Palin. The prospect of her ascendancy into the highest office in the land is enough to keep the left in check.”

KillgoreTrout43 replied on Nov 03, 2009 at 18:27:05

“"The prospect of her ascendancy into the highest office in the land is enough to keep the left in check."

This is simply laughable.

And if it weren't for liberals, Obama would not have been elected.”

DannyRose replied on Nov 03, 2009 at 18:14:36

“First of all, the Congressional electoral debacle occured in 1994, not 1992. Second, it occured after Clinton decided to shaft the Progessive base by caving on such issues as DADT and actively promoting NAFTA (greatest jobs destroyer in US history).

Progressive decided to return the favor by staying home, resulting in the Repug's much vaunted victory.”

hu.man replied on Nov 03, 2009 at 18:13:36

“CORRECTION:

It was in 1994 not 1992 when Clinton got himself in a jam.”
huffingtonpost entry

Sunday Roundup

Commented Nov 01, 2009 at 03:30:38 in Politics

“There has to be some sort of distinction between those who are seriously downloading movies and music and the rest of us.Any other restriction is just another method by which telecoms will be attempting to limit internet access to subscribers.

I would venture to say that we wouldn't even be discussing this if it wasn't for the downright disastrous record the telecoms have with the consumers over all manners concerning communication. Net Neutrality is just another way of saying we don't want to give telecoms free reign by allowing their nose under the tent.

So the message to telecoms is keep the net neutral and find a creative way of apportioning bandwidth. One such method could be prioritizing the traffic on the net. Telecoms just don't want to spend the money to develop the technology that can effectively handle internet traffic. Handling this dilemma like public utilities do which would be metering consumption is not the 21st century answer.”

Greg0658 replied on Nov 01, 2009 at 09:43:27

“"apportioning bandwidth" struck a chord with me .. the av engineer-lite me .. knows this is an issue .. pipes can only flow so much before they can no longer flow for the all asking .. we have been conditioned this fight is about an allotment takeaway .. sorta like healthcare for all .. and is probably true because pipes do cost money and allotment in capitalism is paramount .. apportioning to keep demand and ROI (Return on Investment) optimal”
Afghanistan, Again: The Thicket Obama's Not Getting Out Of

Afghanistan, Again: The Thicket Obama's Not Getting Out Of

Commented Oct 30, 2009 at 02:25:32 in World

“Obama is between the rock and the hard place. If he denies the troops requested for the Afghan war, then he will be deemed responsible for any possible set back in this campaign down the road. If he approves the troop levels, then he is caving into those who want us to become more mired in this seemingly never ending conflict.

Therefore, he has little choice but to give the go ahead to the military request. But, he must engage the diplomatic front in full force in order to bring a termination to the hostilities because this war cannot be won the military front.

The military may be able to at best contain the opposition and stop them from gaining any additional ground. But to think that any troop level will actually result in a wholesale triumph over the Taliban is sheer fantasy.

The troop level increase must be accompanied by performance conditions that military must abide by. Too often military just gets a pass under the banner of patriotism. It is time now that we hold the brass accountable for their failure to perform effectively. This is the only way that badly needed reforms can be enacted in the military.”

hglindquist replied on Oct 30, 2009 at 11:54:51

“Obama put himself in this trap ... and the "politcal expediency" of his Afghan War policies was foreshadowed early on:

"While much continuity with Bush policies exists, some opportunistic changes in the execution of the Afghan war have been made. Most are inspired by the aim to better market “the good war” to the American public."
http://www.rawa.org/temp/runews/2009/04/12/americaand-8217-s-afghan-war-the-real-world-versus-obamaand-8217-s-marketed-imagery.html

David Brooks has an insightful peice on today's OpEd page of The New York Times. See http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/30/opinion/30brooks.html

LizM replied on Oct 30, 2009 at 05:46:43

“This much I know...if a decision to increase combat forces in Afghanistan is made on the basis of political expediency, as you suggest may be the case, then Arianna might be right and the vice president may just have to resign.”

Winning09 replied on Oct 30, 2009 at 04:04:57

“This sounds right.”
huffingtonpost entry

Afghanistan: A Whole New Approach

Commented Oct 29, 2009 at 21:48:36 in World

“The exercise in nation building can be futile one specially when there is no effective central government in Afghanistan and most aid needs to make it through war lords and regional administrators who would want a piece of the action before giving it the green light.

In a country when tribalism reins supreme, the key is to unite strong elements within the tribal hierarchy and create a central government out it. Karzai is not effective because he is not a tribal leader and not rooted within Afghanistan. He came from abroad to lead the country post Taliban collapse.

The solution to this problem is not more head banging. Obama's envoy to the region should focus on forming a coalition government and convince all the elements that it is in their best interest to unite under a single banner and work to improve the conditions in that country.

Once the government in place and the hostilities have ceased, then in the next phase we can focus on massive aid and development this blog is proposing. The aid is indeed needed to sustain the fragile government until it gets its sea legs.”

Antifascist-08 replied on Oct 30, 2009 at 00:48:42

“Thank you. We can all dream, but it is not worth one more American life.”
huffingtonpost entry

Barack Obama Is Doing My Job; Why America Needs Him to Do His

Commented Oct 27, 2009 at 01:33:57 in Business

“Rather than diminishing the systemic risk, we just continue adding to it by allowing the mega financial institutions become even more mega. We need financial system reform on a global scale. Countries that won't play better opt out of the system (that won't happen, everyone will play - stand to lost too much for opting out). The entire global economic system was at risk and the recent financial collapse which is a clear demonstration of how interrelated the financial system is on a global scale.”
Why Joe Biden Should Resign

Why Joe Biden Should Resign

Commented Oct 15, 2009 at 00:52:58 in World

“The military is unfit for the missions of the 21st century. The military, in its current format is obsolete and neither the president and DOD can use effectively use it for any challenges that we are facing now. So it needs to be reformed in order to become an institution that provides effective utility applicable to this day and age.”
Why Joe Biden Should Resign

Why Joe Biden Should Resign

Commented Oct 14, 2009 at 15:47:28 in World

“The military is in major need of reform. Even though it is technologically at the very pinnacle of the 21st century achievements, structurally, it is still a throw back to WWII and the Cold War. The recommendations that the military is making for the conflict in Afghanistan is rooted in these glaring deficiencies.

Until the military takes a good hard look at its mission and purpose within the context of the larger society and attempts to update those to the 21st century, we will be mired in Iraq and Afghan type wars for some time to come. I am not sure how, but it would be really beneficial to encourage the military leadership to begin recognizing the increasingly diminishing returns of their efforts and make a sincere attempt to fundamentally reform its command structure and purpose.”

HGfromOmaha replied on Oct 14, 2009 at 16:00:11

“The military does what they are tasked to do by the leadership from the White House and the Pentagon. Each branch of service has a specific mission.

When you say "Until the military takes a good hard look at its mission and purpose...." who are you referring to?

I will say that the White House & DOD are the organizations that needs to take a hard look about what they use our military "for". We have to stop being the world's police force and start taking care of home. But, I digress.”
huffingtonpost entry

A Moment of Truth with Bill Moyers, Marcy Kaptur, and Simon Johnson

Commented Oct 09, 2009 at 14:57:05 in Business

“I think the objection centers around transparency. Geithner needs to disclose more of what transpires between him and the heads of the big banks in his weekly meetings. This might be a good time for President Obama to ask Geithner to exercise more disclosure and pay more attention to the objections his critics are raising about his conduct of the office.”
huffingtonpost entry

How We Unplug

Commented Oct 07, 2009 at 02:57:20 in Technology

“If there is a need for unplugging, then there is a need for simplifying ones life. We choose to over-commit because there is a perception of emptiness inside that needs to be avoided. Just try and sit quietly for 5 minutes or so. See if you can quiet your mind and bring your awareness to perception of the moment. It is much harder than you think.”
Arianna Discusses Health Care Reform And The Resolution Condemning Joe Wilson On CNN (VIDEO)

Arianna Discusses Health Care Reform And The Resolution Condemning Joe Wilson On CNN (VIDEO)

Commented Sep 16, 2009 at 13:18:01 in Politics

“We have a lot of obstructionists in the congress. Even with Bush, lots of legislation passed with the Democratic support in the congress and a sliver of Republicans who aligned themselves with Bush to push forward his agenda. Government runs on the back of Democrats regardless of who the president is. With a Democrat president, it is even harder to get that sliver of Republican congressional support the GOP presidents get. I think Ariana's point is that we need to get used to the fact Republicans are going to play the role of sour puss from now on. Obama just needs to discount the obstructionist bunch in the congress and move forward with his agenda regardless.”

Kelly Laraia replied on Sep 16, 2009 at 13:45:31

“Actually, there were alot of things Bush didn't get. Social Security reform, Immigration Bill, several judicial nominations blocked. Obstructionism is in the eyes of the beholder.”

KillgoreTrout43 replied on Sep 16, 2009 at 13:25:03

“He can't move forward if the votes aren't there.”
Arianna On

Arianna On "Morning Joe": The Current Financial System Is Not Capitalism (VIDEO)

Commented Sep 15, 2009 at 18:05:05 in Business

“Thank you. This is a very important point. There was no Federal Reserve when the constitution was written. That institution is really a fourth branch of the government that projects unchecked power. A lot of the maladies we are now experiencing in the recent financial debacle can be traced to the Fed's past actions.”

Billyboy321 replied on Sep 15, 2009 at 18:22:05

“The fed income tax was instituted the same year.”
next
1 - 25 of 243