Edit Preferences
Logout
j0em0mma's Comments (312)
View Comments:
Sort:
1 - 25 of 312
Afghanistan: Obama Drops The Other Shoe
Commented Nov 30, 2009 at 15:03:36 in Politics
“Concise and precise. Excellent.”
Afghanistan: Obama Drops The Other Shoe
Commented Nov 30, 2009 at 15:00:54 in Politics
“I agree with this analysis completely. Incredibly depressing.”
Conservatives Terrified of Bringing Terrorists to Justice
Commented Nov 18, 2009 at 14:41:46 in Politics
“If you read more of the article, it also states that New York has a zero percent acquittal rate for terrorism suspects.”
hama66 replied on Nov 18, 2009 at 19:26:08
“unfortunately there is always a first time. not saying this will be it, but the possibility that KSM could be acquitted chills me.”
Liberal Elitism Will Make Sarah Palin President - How Only Union Organizing Can Stop It
Commented Nov 13, 2009 at 11:34:01 in Politics
“Hogwash. I'm as liberal as it gets and I grew up on a farm in Kansas. It's feeding this bogus narratvie that's trouble, not the reality.”
Obama One Year Later: The Audacity of Winning vs. The Timidity of Governing
Commented Nov 03, 2009 at 13:47:25 in Politics
“LOL, you felt that way about the "Mission Accomplisher" too, right?”
Obama One Year Later: The Audacity of Winning vs. The Timidity of Governing
Commented Nov 03, 2009 at 13:46:33 in Politics
“Man the concern trolling in here is rough. Trying to re-ignite feuding between HRC supporters and Obama supporters. Don't fall for it, people.”
Truthahn replied on Nov 03, 2009 at 14:04:58
“By your reasoning Arianna is a concern troll on her own website.”
bluessss82 replied on Nov 03, 2009 at 13:59:04
“Such "sympathy" troIIs are usually, readily apparent ......and easily dismissed”
PeacefulRevolution replied on Nov 03, 2009 at 13:53:41
“Not a chance.”
Betrayed replied on Nov 03, 2009 at 13:53:32
“Did that feud ever end?
Don't blame the "trolls".”
Don't blame the "trolls".”
A New Wrinkle in the JFK Assassination Story
Commented Oct 30, 2009 at 13:51:48 in Books
“Well, there goes history...”
hp blogger Nelson Montana replied on Oct 30, 2009 at 15:20:43
“I think you, and others, missed my point. Or chose to.
I'm not saying we should disregard historical information, So let me more concrete so it isn't misunderstood.
Anyone who "reveals" what could have been revealed decades ago but WITHHOLDS it until it can not be substantiated is suspect to say the least.
And yes, I am old enough to remember the Kennedy assassination.”
I'm not saying we should disregard historical information, So let me more concrete so it isn't misunderstood.
Anyone who "reveals" what could have been revealed decades ago but WITHHOLDS it until it can not be substantiated is suspect to say the least.
And yes, I am old enough to remember the Kennedy assassination.”
foxisms replied on Oct 30, 2009 at 14:20:47
“~faved~”
foxisms replied on Oct 30, 2009 at 14:16:57
“LOL.
~faved~”
~faved~”
HeevenSteven replied on Oct 30, 2009 at 14:07:40
“Any account without corroborating evidence is worthless.”
Keep Going, Republicans! You're Doing Great!
Commented Oct 21, 2009 at 19:13:49 in Politics
“You're quoting the The Washington Times...?
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/aug/11/double-dip-recession/”
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/aug/11/double-dip-recession/”
Jimboy17 replied on Oct 21, 2009 at 19:38:45
“No. Simply my gut. A second dip later this year or early next year will not do the Obama admin any good.”
Keep Going, Republicans! You're Doing Great!
Commented Oct 21, 2009 at 19:02:36 in Politics
“In the spirit of the article shhhh! fallingsky's totally right. Please, keep it up!”
The Nobel Prize With an Asterisk
Commented Oct 16, 2009 at 09:28:45 in World
“Are you Still talking about this?! Let it go! Sheesh!”
yogandclimber replied on Oct 16, 2009 at 13:22:17
“Seriously! Plus who did he beat? I don't see any of the other candidates coming out saying they should have won it over Obama.”
AP Asks If Obama Is "Obnoxiously Articulate"
Commented Oct 15, 2009 at 13:47:55 in Media
“For sure. Nothing new under the sun :)”
AP Asks If Obama Is "Obnoxiously Articulate"
Commented Oct 15, 2009 at 12:54:14 in Media
“Republican Dirty Trick #45, Section 2
"Turn your weakness into a strength and your opponent's strengths into a weakness."”
"Turn your weakness into a strength and your opponent's strengths into a weakness."”
DocSyracuse replied on Oct 15, 2009 at 13:15:10
“Sounds more like Sun Tsu.”
Exasperated replied on Oct 15, 2009 at 13:03:17
“Exactly. Karl Rove always said that you have to attack your opponent’s strengths. Their weaknesses are give-mes, but if you can turn a strength into a weakness, then you can make some headway. For example: John Kerry never expected that his military commendations would become such an albatross. That was political genius of Rove (dirty and despicable, but genius). And it took the democrats by surprise. So now we have a very well spoken, smart president. AP (shill for GOP) suggests that it is a weakness. The news becomes the news and then the story.”
Why Obama's Mideast Policy Will Work
Commented Oct 08, 2009 at 16:42:49 in World
“A deterant? What do you call it when only one side has produced nuclear arms? That's not a deterant. It's the opposite of a deterant. In fact, it's a strong argument, from the Iranian point of view, to obtain them... as a deterant!”
Why Obama's Mideast Policy Will Work
Commented Oct 08, 2009 at 16:14:57 in World
“Oh, well then, I'd definitely commit war crimes that would be guaranteed to generate more hatred and revenge. Wouldn't you?”
JanP replied on Oct 08, 2009 at 17:17:19
“Israel did virtually nothing for years and still the rockets came and still the UN said nothing.
The best strategy (according to some science magaines) is tit-for-tat. As long as the Palestinians cooperate, you cooperate. When they try and kill you, you make them pay a higher price.
By the way, why didn't you call rockdting civilians in Sderot a war crime? Why do you expect the israelis to be more tolerant of attempts to kill them than the palestinians?”
The best strategy (according to some science magaines) is tit-for-tat. As long as the Palestinians cooperate, you cooperate. When they try and kill you, you make them pay a higher price.
By the way, why didn't you call rockdting civilians in Sderot a war crime? Why do you expect the israelis to be more tolerant of attempts to kill them than the palestinians?”
Rise of "Rainbow Right" Challenges Clinton's Demographic Argument
Commented Sep 29, 2009 at 16:31:07 in Politics
“Wow, now THAT's one heckuva alternate reality, Bruce. I had no idea an unaligned, but conservative, group was hiding behind all the fanatics, slowly building steam... Of course, it's total BS, but it SOUNDS great! If you're a fringe moderate conservative watching his country and party fade into the sunset...”
ImmanuelGoldstein replied on Sep 30, 2009 at 14:21:43
“Yeah, notice how he doesn't provide any actual numbers just a lot of arm waving. Any basis for these claims other than unverifiable andecdotes?”
RedDogBear replied on Sep 29, 2009 at 18:03:20
“Very well said. The rainbow right?! Give me a break. Hey Bruce have you LOOKED at video from the republican convention or the tea bagger protests? Its a sea of white faces. And every poll I've seen shows the republicans losing ground everywhere but most of all among non-whites. This was really one of the most ridiculous columns I've seen in a long time.”
The Impeachment of President Obama
Commented Sep 23, 2009 at 21:42:39 in Politics
“We are not heading for a Republican retake. If anything, we'll see a third or fourth party break-away later to reform into the same two party system. And it will, of course, as usual, reflect the business interests vs. the people's interest. There is nothing new under the sun, just a different mashup of individual outcomes...”
twofish replied on Sep 23, 2009 at 22:12:36
“If only! one of the parties represented the people's interest. The Dems just string us along so we'll vote for them at election time. Then it's "sit down and shut up" again.”
The FWDing of the Conservative Revolution
Commented Sep 08, 2009 at 16:52:50 in Politics
“Yeah, somehow, the fact that they were true actually made them funnier. These are just like watching a car accident... Fascinating and more than a little disturbing...”
Fayyad's Brilliant Two-Year Plan for Palestinian Statehood
Commented Sep 01, 2009 at 00:32:38 in World
“Yawn, your partisan nature is plain to see. I think my sarcasm was clear and to the point. Plugging your ears and going "blah blah blah" doesn't make criticism less relevant.”
Fayyad's Brilliant Two-Year Plan for Palestinian Statehood
Commented Sep 01, 2009 at 00:31:13 in World
“Nope”
Fayyad's Brilliant Two-Year Plan for Palestinian Statehood
Commented Aug 28, 2009 at 01:26:55 in World
“Hint: Excuse needed to perpetuate hateful, collective punishment leading to nothing but the desire for revenge. Hatfield, meet McCoy, meet nobody wins. When are some grown-ups going to show up? Oh yeah, the focus of this article. Yet some can't restrain themselves from crapping on any solution. But hey, the status quo is super-duper. Maybe someone can start World War... which number are we actually on now? Religious, National, and Personal self-importance is definitely more important that peace and prosperity. Maybe y'all can open some more illegal settlements? That's bound to contain some kind of self-fulfilling prophecy. But, hey, I am an American. We come built in with an Army who believes in the End Times and thinks y'all will be converted to Christians on Judgement Day! So we all have something to "gain" from this... very, irrefutably sane approach to our fellow man...”
ModernTimes1 replied on Aug 28, 2009 at 12:39:23
“Joemomma, you'd bettere stick to Sarah Palin blogs. That's more on your paygrade.
Leave international things to adults.”
Leave international things to adults.”
TheLonelyGod replied on Aug 28, 2009 at 09:25:17
“This has to be one of the most nonsensical posts I've ever read.”
Fayyad's Brilliant Two-Year Plan for Palestinian Statehood
Commented Aug 27, 2009 at 22:19:37 in World
“Speaking of semantics, can you explain to me what you think the difference is between blockade and siege?
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/blockade
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/siege
--"a military blockade of a city or fortified place to compel it to surrender"”
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/blockade
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/siege
--"a military blockade of a city or fortified place to compel it to surrender"”
fbr79 replied on Aug 31, 2009 at 15:22:48
“Ok, let's explain to civilians, once again, the differences between a blockade and a siege. A siege is a military blockade of a CITY or FORTRESS, with the intent being a full out assault or conquest. While a blockade can be done with or without Armed forces involvement, it can be maritime, over land or air (or all mentioned), it intends on cutting communications and trade in order to debilitate the REGION or COUNTRY being blockaded. Is that sufficient explanation?”
Israeli Soldier Kidnapping Suspected, Central Israel On High Alert
Commented Aug 14, 2009 at 14:39:04 in World
“This type of "reasoning" says a lot about you...”
Israeli Soldier Kidnapping Suspected, Central Israel On High Alert
Commented Aug 13, 2009 at 23:36:43 in World
“Uh, oh... watch out innocent civilians, here comes the phosphorous...”
Tea Party Madness to Sweep the Nation?
Commented Aug 12, 2009 at 16:11:06 in Politics
“People in this country are pigs at a trough complaining about the slop. "meh meh meh meh, taxes, meh meh meh, don't take away my medicaid... blah blah blah...”
1 - 25 of 312
