kyeshinka's Comments (690)
Cannabis Cafe: First U.S. Marijuana Cafe Opens In Portland
Commented Nov 14, 2009 at 10:31:09 in Business
“Couldn't say it better. First health care reform, then pot legalization. Their little empire is starting to crumble, and they're paranoid and you're right that they'll fight it.”
Cannabis Cafe: First U.S. Marijuana Cafe Opens In Portland
Commented Nov 14, 2009 at 10:24:10 in Business
“Finally, behind-the-curve America is finally coming to its senses about legalizing marijuana, at least in the more enlightened and intelligent places that respect personal freedoms beyond the right to carry guns. Now can we start releasing the thousands of people in our prisons for possession? I think their kids may grow up more responsibly with the parents home, and maybe the cycle of inner city violence will end.”
NevaforLeadership replied on Nov 14, 2009 at 10:38:41
“Maybe you can butt out your weed, come out from behind your haze, look at our world and life with clarity and move from sucking mind altering drugs to making a real difference to our planet and the environment.”
Putin Gets Down At Hip-Hop Party (VIDEO)
Commented Nov 14, 2009 at 10:15:56 in World
“Does this mean there will be more hip hop in Moscow nightclubs? I don't know if it's changed in five years, but it was always house, trance, techno, more house, all night long. But there was no hip hop. Snoop Dog was in town a couple weeks ago and I'm not sure how well the concert was attended. That town really needs a more diverse music scene.”
Obama: I'm "America's First Pacific President" (VIDEO)
Commented Nov 13, 2009 at 23:57:07 in World
“We've never been at peace for more than 10 years at a time, so we wouldn't know any better.”
Obama: I'm "America's First Pacific President" (VIDEO)
Commented Nov 13, 2009 at 23:54:14 in World
“Good post, but I disagree on your assessment on Asian countries providing good track records in management or producing world class products. Look at Taiwan and South Korea, and, to a lesser extent, Indonesia and Malaysia, and how much they've advanced in economic might and democratic institutions in less than 50 years. The last two have a ways to go, but I'm excited to see how these countries will look in the near future.”
Larry King Defends Carrie Prejean Interview: "I Didn't Ask Anything Wrong"
Commented Nov 13, 2009 at 22:49:36 in Media
“In addition to greed, lust, pride, and you could see the wrath building underneath.”
Larry King Defends Carrie Prejean Interview: "I Didn't Ask Anything Wrong"
Commented Nov 13, 2009 at 22:10:28 in Media
“Yes, but the tide is turning fast. Put gay marriage to a vote in 10 years and you'll see different results.”
calibabe replied on Nov 13, 2009 at 22:55:56
“Yes, tides change fast. I suspect we will see such a tide change in 2010 and 2012”
Larry King Defends Carrie Prejean Interview: "I Didn't Ask Anything Wrong"
Commented Nov 13, 2009 at 22:07:53 in Media
“He was being polite as possible, trying to keep the interview moving. She obviously doesn't respond to kindness or is able to carry on respecful conversations without being shallow, nasty, and abusive. That's probably why someone this beautiful has ex-boyfriends already.”
Larry King Defends Carrie Prejean Interview: "I Didn't Ask Anything Wrong"
Commented Nov 13, 2009 at 17:38:23 in Media
“Another Paris Hilton except less class.”
thinkagain2 replied on Nov 13, 2009 at 17:44:55
“Paris Hilton has enough self awareness to realize she is a joke...a very rich joke, but still a joke that even she pokes fun at. Prejean is a dumb bimbo. In regards to "the question" at the pageant: "I was just standing there trying to be pretty like I'm supposed to do"
She's pretty if you like plastic.”
She's pretty if you like plastic.”
Pharma CEO: We Will Fight House Health Care Bill
Commented Nov 13, 2009 at 13:40:35 in Politics
“If ACORN isn't among them, Fox News isn't interested.”
lazercat2008 replied on Nov 13, 2009 at 15:50:13
“Where is that pimp and ho when you need them?”
Pharma CEO: We Will Fight House Health Care Bill
Commented Nov 13, 2009 at 13:39:36 in Politics
“No, you're right. The people Grayson mentioned on the floor of the House really never died. The congressman paid their families to use their names as part of an elaborate hoax. Total leftist propaganda!!”
Liberal Elitism? No. Some People Are, Sadly, Stupid
Commented Nov 13, 2009 at 12:39:36 in Politics
“What does "elite" even mean? Does it mean something totally different here than "elite" in just about every other country on earth? I always thought "Elite" meant wealthy, well-to-do. These tea partiers probably make or have lots more money than my liberal friends who are all broke, but well-traveled and well-read. This is why many poor liberals feel out of place in our own country.”
Godweiser replied on Nov 13, 2009 at 14:27:29
“They've turned meritocracy into a dirty word. Despite all that palaver about pulling oneself up by the bootstraps and getting educated and making ones own way, even while showing solidarity with really rich people who are entrenched in politics and using their money and influence to run the system, they seem to dislike anyone that informs themselves enough to challenge the system.
They're a reactionary movement that's been manipulated to defend the true elites of this country -- like the health insurance industry. So in reality, they're mobilized in defense of elites against the middle class.
Except that much of history shows that a strong and vibrant middle class is often what fuels a vibrant culture with a strong economy, increased liberties and social justice. Wealth polarization tends to be a handmaiden of a country's plunge into the toilet. Without a vibrant middle class, there wouldn't have been Athenian Democracy, the Roman Empire, the Renaissance, the Reformation or the Enlightenment. More to the point, the US became very prosperous in the 1950's when the middle class family prospered accordingly.
The middle class are not the elites, and the wealthiest members of any thriving society need them to harvest. But they're bad farmers in this country, and now they're turning the mobs against them instead of tending to their fields.”
They're a reactionary movement that's been manipulated to defend the true elites of this country -- like the health insurance industry. So in reality, they're mobilized in defense of elites against the middle class.
Except that much of history shows that a strong and vibrant middle class is often what fuels a vibrant culture with a strong economy, increased liberties and social justice. Wealth polarization tends to be a handmaiden of a country's plunge into the toilet. Without a vibrant middle class, there wouldn't have been Athenian Democracy, the Roman Empire, the Renaissance, the Reformation or the Enlightenment. More to the point, the US became very prosperous in the 1950's when the middle class family prospered accordingly.
The middle class are not the elites, and the wealthiest members of any thriving society need them to harvest. But they're bad farmers in this country, and now they're turning the mobs against them instead of tending to their fields.”
PATina replied on Nov 13, 2009 at 14:11:48
“Just to make sure I had it right... I checked Merriam Webster. Being elite has little to do w/ money. Here's the actually entry for your perusal.
1 : the choice part or segment : FLOWER, CREAM, ARISTOCRACY : as a : a segment or group regarded as socially superior b : highly trained soldiers”
1 : the choice part or segment : FLOWER, CREAM, ARISTOCRACY : as a : a segment or group regarded as socially superior b : highly trained soldiers”
Saskanuck replied on Nov 13, 2009 at 14:05:12
“That's because, as far as I can see, "elite" is one of those words here that has been transformed into meaning "egotistical". Someone that flaunts what one or both may see as a strong ability (often intelligence, but any proficiency is good enough). At least one of the replies to you has already mistaken the word for ego.
Except that elite doesn't mean that. The closest it may mean to that is a person of the highest class or that may exert a lot of power/influence. If you notice, most of the people using it deploy it as a personality trait, and mostly negative. How often do you see "elite humanitarian"?
Thing is, I WANT elite policymakers. I WANT someone that may be at the top of the game in knowing how to craft and implement programs. But for some reason in the US it seems that "common" or "average" is good, and "elite" is bad.”
Except that elite doesn't mean that. The closest it may mean to that is a person of the highest class or that may exert a lot of power/influence. If you notice, most of the people using it deploy it as a personality trait, and mostly negative. How often do you see "elite humanitarian"?
Thing is, I WANT elite policymakers. I WANT someone that may be at the top of the game in knowing how to craft and implement programs. But for some reason in the US it seems that "common" or "average" is good, and "elite" is bad.”
ProfessorDuh replied on Nov 13, 2009 at 13:51:53
“In the United States, "elite" can now be defined as "anyone who isn't stupid and ignorant."”
Prudens replied on Nov 13, 2009 at 13:45:05
“Actually, recent polling has shown that those who identify as strongly liberal fall into two demographic groups: The rich (salary 200,000+), and the poor (under 30,000 a year). Basically, those that can afford to throw money away, and those who could use government support. Tea partiers are actually middle or lower middle class (working class) in general. Just look at how they are dressed in general at rallies. They arent exactly rolling around in Armani suits. It is a part of the reason why the term liberal elite which has a lot more traction these days due to its large demographic of ultra rich constituents.”
ProperGanda replied on Nov 13, 2009 at 13:28:14
“When I think of an Elitist, I think of a judgmental Prius owner, who tells you that driving your 1980's pickup truck is ecoterrorism and thinks he/she is better than you. He or she also talks with their eyes closed.”
EndRacismNow replied on Nov 13, 2009 at 13:02:01
“Being educated doesn't make someone an elitist. The elite normally are very rich, powerful, and condescending. It's an arrogance our leaders have that leads them to have a 'Father knows best' mentality. They continually ignore the American public on the left and the right because they don't care. They will continue their agenda to keep power and amass more riches. There are elitists from both sides of the political spectrum. The right are hypocrites if they are going to accuse only the left of elitism.”
doubtingdavid replied on Nov 13, 2009 at 12:49:42
“Maybe if they didn't travel so much they wouldn't be broke.”
Colbert Demolishes "Sesame Street"'s Conservative Critics (VIDEO)
Commented Nov 12, 2009 at 21:49:03 in Comedy
“It's certainly a pittance when you compare it to the money we gave the government to pay for wars in Iraq that most of us didn't want. The argument they use is pitiful and it's funny they don't know it.”
Liberal Elitism Will Make Sarah Palin President - How Only Union Organizing Can Stop It
Commented Nov 12, 2009 at 17:06:27 in Politics
“What is a "liberal elite" anyway? Can we give that a rest? "Elite" means rich, houses on the coast, lots of vacations, and control our destiny. Sounds conservative to me. All of my friends are liberals and have advanced degrees and they're flat broke.”
RoyPiper replied on Nov 12, 2009 at 18:14:12
“The Hamptons votes Democratic. Cant get much richer or elite than that. New York City, Los Angeles, San Francisco...these area relatively rich areas that tend to vote Democratic. The South is much poorer and tends to vote GOP. Although there are rich that support both sides, I think it probably tips to the Left.”
MOCONSERVATIVE replied on Nov 12, 2009 at 17:18:15
“you are tying elitists with money... a great many of liberal elitists are flat broke, but no less guilty of looking down thier collective noses at the working class... it's about frame of mind, not checkbook balance.”
kellysmalltowngirl replied on Nov 12, 2009 at 17:18:00
“Define flat broke. Do you mean they don't have houses on the coasts or take lots of vacations? Because working class flat broke means you have to wait until payday to buy groceries and are eating ramen noodles for the next three days.”
Owens-Hoffman Race Tightens: NY-23 Election Will Depend On Absentee Ballots
Commented Nov 12, 2009 at 16:39:32 in New York
“All votes should be counted. Too bad this didn't work for Al Gore.”
Colbert Demolishes "Sesame Street"'s Conservative Critics (VIDEO)
Commented Nov 12, 2009 at 15:53:50 in Comedy
“Yeah, it's getting a bit old.”
Carrie Prejean Threatens To Walk Off "Larry King" (VIDEO)
Commented Nov 12, 2009 at 10:20:13 in Entertainment
“She wanted to call off the interview for further proof her 1st amendment rights are being squashed by the left wing media. What a vacant, cold, calculating, spiteful woman.”
VPN replied on Nov 12, 2009 at 10:38:53
“Dumbasaboxofrocks as well.”
canfemlib replied on Nov 12, 2009 at 10:35:43
“What's the name of that song, "She ain't pretty, she just looks that way'? It comes to mind whenever I see her name in the news....”
Carrie Prejean Threatens To Walk Off "Larry King" (VIDEO)
Commented Nov 12, 2009 at 08:46:04 in Entertainment
“There is nothing to like about this woman. Maybe for a half hour if she doesn't talk, then goodbye.”
rchwel replied on Nov 12, 2009 at 10:04:27
“I think she charges by the hour though !”
CNN Paradox: Organization Thriving While Primetime Ratings Fall
Commented Nov 11, 2009 at 22:34:57 in Media
“CNN's demographic tilts to the left? Well some on the left haven't taken the hint yet that CNN is just awful. Who gets any news from this network after the yelling, arguing, bogus statistics, unreliable sources, taking sides in international conflicts, failure to confront guests who mislead the viewers, and shallow analysis? Watch CNN for five hours and you know less about the world than 10 minutes of Jim Lehrer. It's entertainment, most of us understand that and that's why the ratings are down. Conservatives don't know they're being played for suckers and that's why Fox's ratings are high. CNN is "liberal" only because they don't hate Obama like Fox does. Otherwise it's pretty much the same.”
CNN Paradox: Organization Thriving While Primetime Ratings Fall
Commented Nov 11, 2009 at 22:28:27 in Media
“No kidding. On the rare occasion someone with a dish has it I can't stop watching. It's remarkable-just news, video, interviews; no dumbed-down analysis, no fighting, no arguing, no inane smiling, no gesturing stupidly. It was so relaxing to watch real news for a change. This isn't available anywhere else on cable.”
10 States Face Looming Budget Disasters: Pew Report
Commented Nov 11, 2009 at 17:51:33 in Politics
“Wow, suddenly my insanely boring state of Iowa doesn't look too bad.”
JShankel replied on Nov 11, 2009 at 18:24:50
“Hey, at least you guys have marriage equality. Someday I hope California will be as progressive as...Iowa?”
Jon Stewart Catches Sean Hannity Falsifying Footage To Make GOP Protest Appear Bigger (VIDEO)
Commented Nov 11, 2009 at 17:02:29 in Comedy
“That's right. Everyone makes mistakes.”
KillgoreTrout43 replied on Nov 11, 2009 at 17:06:49
“Google Master was being sarcastic!! FOX knows exactly what they're doing.”
austin4 replied on Nov 11, 2009 at 17:04:39
“In the case Of Fraud News,, they L!E continually . Non stop LYI NG.”
Jon Stewart Catches Sean Hannity Falsifying Footage To Make GOP Protest Appear Bigger (VIDEO)
Commented Nov 11, 2009 at 17:00:36 in Comedy
“I remember being told to question every bit of information-whether it was CNN's "balanced" reporting of the NATO attacks of Serbia or NPR's "objectivity" in Iraq, even though they cut a deal with the military to embed journalists. And Fox News isn't news at all. Students today are probably not told to question anything since they don't watch the news in the first place.”
Republicans File Constitutional Amendment Limiting Bills to 5 Pages
Commented Nov 11, 2009 at 16:01:25 in Comedy
“Yes, I know it's not true, but I imagine it will happen in a couple years.”
Washington Times Beefs Up Security As Internal Turmoil Continues [UPDATE]
Commented Nov 11, 2009 at 15:41:59 in Media
“I would think the "freedom-loving" folks at the Washington times would naturally oppose armed guards.”
jsarets replied on Nov 11, 2009 at 16:33:25
“They support freedom for institutions, not for people, and certainly not for employees.”


