HuffPost Social News

michael429's Comments (75)

View Comments:   Sort:
next
1 - 25 of 75
A Muslim Soldier's View from Fort Hood

A Muslim Soldier's View from Fort Hood

Commented Nov 07, 2009 at 10:17:25 in World

“The writer states; "Instead of a religion of hatred and misogyny, he found an Islam of love, wisdom, and human empowerment. His strategic analysis blossomed into spiritual identification, and Richard embraced Islam just over two years ago. As a “revert” (as Muslim converts like to call themselves, since Islam believes everyone is born a Muslim), Richard was faced with the added challenge of being a soldier in a conflict in which members of his new faith were on the other side."

without questioning his sincerity, i ask him to point to one country that is governed by Muslim theocrats or their political surrogates that reflects the values that he states. One thing that the Soviets got right was their intolerance for ALL attempts by ANY religious group to assert political power or attempt to achieve geographic dominance.

Religious and ethnic "tribalism" and the fight for resources is still at the root of every violent conflict whether it is two tribes fighting over firewood, two gangs fighting for street turf, or two world powers fighting over oil.”
huffingtonpost entry

A Funny Thing Happened on My Way to Talk About Afghanistan

Commented Oct 16, 2009 at 17:44:16 in Media

“a sensational distraction from world events...t­o provide the MSM with a full day of cheap content...­.things are desperate in Conventional Media Land.....i­t seems as if the competition to dumb down content has no bottom....­.to his credit....­Chris Matthews seems to be the only one of these performers who consistently disappears rather than participate in this stuff (Olbermann frequently takes the night off as well as Maddow)...­..but poor Ed still has to do what he is told at least until he gets some ratings...­.so don't blame him.

the award for "Most Inane Commentary­"....must go to Wolf Blitzer...­....his constant droning of useless narrative was compelling if nothing else to see how long he could continue..­..

they ought to use relentless exposure to Wolf instead of water boarding..­..it hasn't been banned by the Geneva convention yet and i suspect it may be as cruel...it certainly is unusual...­.”
huffingtonpost entry

It's the Unemployment, Stupid

Commented Oct 05, 2009 at 12:49:43 in Politics

“Work hard like the Investment Bankers and Private Equity thieves?..­.Work hard like George W. Bush ? a living example of the Meritocracy that is America...­Work hard like the migrant farm worker that feeds you?...tel­l me what exactly do you mean by "Work Hard"....t­he sign on the entrance to the concentration camps translated said "Work will set you free".....­What planet do you live on?....”
huffingtonpost entry

It's the Unemployment, Stupid

Commented Oct 05, 2009 at 10:20:06 in Politics

“You've had this party at the expense of the American taxpayer and worker for years. Most Americans agree that traffic lights are necessary, that bridges need to be built to certain minimum engineering standards, that Social Security and Medicaid are good things....­but the large microphone and the loud voices of Wall Street scream at any regulation of capital markets as being "Big Government" and interfering in the general welfare...­.If government is so inept at running and regulating business, why have have Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and China done so well with their government run command and control economies?­......i am not advocating either of those systems for the U.S. just pointing out that some form of effective regulation and fair regulation of financial markets is essential for the well being of all of us. The past thirty years has shown the largest transfer of wealth (without war) probably in history and we are the losers....­the manufacturing jobs that have been lost here have largely been diluted around the world to third world and emerging countries with little benefit to the workers in many (not all) cases...an­d certainly no benefit to U.S. workers. The American Capitalist Party as you call it...has already had it's day.”
huffingtonpost entry

It's the Unemployment, Stupid

Commented Oct 05, 2009 at 09:52:27 in Politics

“the writer refers to a "tenuous majority".­...it is a baffling statement.­....Obama has the largest margin of Democrats since FDR....Bus­h had a much smaller majority in the House and the Republicans controlled the Senate by only one or two votes and in fact the Dems had a Senate majority for many of the Bush years....Y­et the discipline of the Republicans enabled them to push almost every agenda through both houses....­The "Blue Dog" Democrats need to be pushed into line Karl Rove style...bu­t the Democrats are either unable or unwilling to make that happen....­.the result is a milquetoast administration full of career politicians who, regardless of party affiliation have their hands in the pockets of special interest. So, nothing of consequence really changes...­.I voted for Obama from the beginning with the hope (not convinced) that we would get something better than the inevitable party hacks that the Clintons would bring to the table....I owe Ralph Nader an apology.”
huffingtonpost entry

The Story That Made Me Tear Up My Prepared Speech at a Big Education Conference

Commented Sep 09, 2009 at 18:59:20 in Politics

“Yup....soc­ialism for large corporations that are too large to fail.....c­orporate farms that have been feeding at the public trough for years.....­socialized medical care for members of congress and their families..­..Socialis­m for energy companies by providing drilling and exploration allowances and tax credits for research and development.

but nothing for the family farm....th­e small business..­..the local banks or the displaced people....­.all are small enough to fail.

thanks again Arianna...­.for your evolved and compassionate voice.”

Courtney Reardon replied on Sep 09, 2009 at 22:54:13

“Yes michael429­...everyth­ing you said especially the evolved and compassionate part. I distinctly feel we have reached an apex where we can see psychological evolution at work. It is increasingly clear that the Gobbers, in general of course, are turning into a different species 'of sorts'...t­heir brains operate differently. one plus one is not two..the bell does not toll for thee/them.­..dour, small...wi­ll we look back in history and see a 'branch' in our development as humanoids? And, more importantly is how do we dominate them? How do we survive their extreme posturing, aggression, meanness, killer instincts, lack of insight, reptilian brained black and whiteness.­..how do we win if reason and heart have no impact? Magical thinking does not work for me, so no suggestions of prayer or incense...­let's think it thru...”
huffingtonpost entry

William Kunstler: Disturbing the Universe is Great History

Commented Sep 07, 2009 at 13:58:15 in New York

“i attended the screening of Disturbing the Universe in E.H.. When Emily and Sarah Kunstler were introduced before the film my impression was that it would be some sort of glorified and family centered view of their father. How wrong I was. I congratulate them and thank them for creating a great portrait of a great man. They captured their father, the man and the times that he lived in without sentimentalizing any of it. Revealing him as the complex and flawed hero that he was while adding enough of the family relationship without making that the center of the story. It must have been a challenge to maintain that balance. The result of their hard work paid off. This film will insure that the lives that William Kunstler touched and saved, and the transformative effect that his activism had on people will not be forgotten.”
huffingtonpost entry

Sunday Roundup

Commented Sep 06, 2009 at 19:57:36 in Home

“gone too far?...thi­s administration is less than a year old and aside from continuing the Bush policies of fiscal stimulus and continuing to fund the war, the administration has yet to accomplish anything..­.so please explain what you mean by "gone to far".....b­y the way, he was elected by a majority..­..on a platform of "change"..­.you had it your way for the past eight years, with barely a wimper from congress..­..and in fact bi-partison support on every major law that Bush/Cheney demanded, from the Patriot Act to the War Powers act to the deficit spending and the deregulation that contributed to the fiscal mess that we are in...so what has happened in the past eight months that results in "gone to far"?”
huffingtonpost entry

Sunday Roundup

Commented Sep 06, 2009 at 17:51:23 in Home

“i hate to throw that term around....­but nobody has ever brought this kind of objection up to a white president of either party.....­what do these people mean when they say that they "Want my country back"?....­that combined with the other fear and code word race baiting kinds of statements that are routinely thrown around by the "pundits" unfortunately point to racism as a component of this.

If you don't like the president or what he stands for, then talk with your kids about it. Are people so afraid that their kids will abandon their values because they hear a speech?...­.think about it.”

ron46032 replied on Sep 06, 2009 at 18:35:24

“"Want my country back" means that the left have gone too far. This is a fight/argument over ideology not black vs white.

The American way is to protest when others have gone too far or do something your don't agree with. This is all that is happening.

What's new here is that most of us now getting involved have been silent before. We really are the silent majority. Now we've been pushed way too far and are speaking out.

Typically it's always been the left who have taken the streets to be heard. Now the right have taken to the streets. Unless BO changes things, I would say that it will only get more vocal.”
huffingtonpost entry

Sunday Roundup

Commented Sep 06, 2009 at 12:43:57 in Home

“This is the continuation of overt racism being pushed and fanned by the propaganda of the hate mongering talk radio and Fox....tow­ard those who cannot get past the fact that they lost the last election..­.(what do they mean by "We want our country back"?) and the cowardly Republican politicians that are going along with it because they are afraid of offending their declining base are just as irresponsibly responsible for the hate mongering.

very sad and disturbing that these Totalitarian like methods of using public forums (town meetings) to shout down opposition is working. This needs to be fought, not ignored...­.if you live in a school district that refuses to air the presidents talk then call your neighbors, start a phone tree, have everyone call each member of the school board....r­emind them that we are now the majority, only we are not going to be silent or silenced..­..fight back against the voices of ignorance, hate, fear and the cynics that exploit.”

masher replied on Sep 06, 2009 at 14:14:34

“Ok, if that's the case then tell us how Obama has championed working American families?

Has he ended or even talked about ending work visas? What about amnesty? Heck, Obama even floated the idea of privatizing the VA. How do you defend the Wall Street bailouts with no reform(PPIP was Obama's program and is far larger than Bush's TARP)?

How can you defend the GM bailouts that forced huge cuts on the union workers but let the CEO walk away with millions!? Also most of the GM executives that drive GM into the ground are still running GM thanks to Obama. And GM is using the bailouts to strengthen their Chinese divisions and are talking about importing Chinese cars into the US...thank­s to Obama!

How in the world do you defend that?! GM is a global corporation, not American. So Obama is getting us to bailout China. That's sick. A corporation needs to be either American or not if they expect help.”

ron46032 replied on Sep 06, 2009 at 13:21:56

“Not liking the policies of an administration are not racists.”
huffingtonpost entry

What Obama Must Demand from Congress on Health Care

Commented Sep 04, 2009 at 14:30:48 in Politics

“Good definition­...i take no issue with it....but it doesn't sound anything at all like health reform to me....regu­lation and equal access do not = ownership.­...the big problem with all of this polarization is that there is really no room for discussion­...just label throwing and propaganda­....you really cannot debate the democratic party proposal for health care because there is no bill that has come out of months of attempted negotiation to get some kind of bi-partisan agreement.

it is much easier to throw a label on something and keep repeating it than to actually attempt to solve what most thoughtful people believe to be a significant problem.

when Bush threw all of that money to save the big banks that were too big to fail....wh­ere was the talk of socialism?­...that only began when there was an attempt to help the auto workers.

think about it....”
huffingtonpost entry

What Obama Must Demand from Congress on Health Care

Commented Sep 04, 2009 at 12:58:02 in Politics

“so, all government programs= socialism?­...."progr­essive tax rates are theft"?

the ancient Romans and Greeks were not familiar with the idea of socialism.­..yet they considered it a duty of the priviliged to fully fund services for the poor and for slaves, the ruling class funded the arts, infrastructure projects and healthcare­....

was that "socialism" or social responsibility?”

Oldsop replied on Sep 04, 2009 at 13:21:53

“Try this definition from wikipedia, not my favorite source but socialism is not that tough to define:

"Socialism refers to various theories of economic organization advocating state, worker or public ownership and administration of the means of production and allocation of resources, and a society characterized by equal access to resources for all individuals with an egalitarian method of compensati­on."

Sure sounds like the democrat health care bill to me.”
huffingtonpost entry

The Role of Song in Advancing Health Care Reform

Commented Sep 03, 2009 at 18:31:33 in Politics

“Witness to a Tea Party

I past by a rally the other day
Most of the people were pale, white and grey
they want their country back I heard them say
From the Socialists, Liberals and Gays
So I stopped and I listened

“We love America,
we love our cheesburgers
We love our right to smoke
We love our ignorance
A form of innocence
That Obama is taking away”

“We like things just the way they were
Eight long months ago
Before Obama got here
And started in with Health Care
And other stuff that makes our numbers grow”

I scratched my head in silence
As I listened to them chant
Seemed to me they didn’t love much at all
Seemed to me they were afraid
And that at the heart of their parade
Is a wish to see any progress fall

Healthcare’s too expensive
It isn’t like a war
It’s not something
We should be forced to do

No regulated system
Could possibly be good
Instead we need to revoke
Our right to sue

"If the Founding Fathers wished it
They would have insisted
That it be written right into our laws
The idea things are changing
That they are re-arranging
Means that we will settle this score"

I shrugged and walked away
Thinking that I can afford to pay
For what a great many of them
never had from the start
And how fear and greed
can blunt a generous deed
blinding the mind and heart”
President Scarborough?

President Scarborough? "Morning Joe" Would Be a Viable Threat To Obama in 2012

Commented Sep 02, 2009 at 23:44:32 in Media

“But if he runs for president, who will make condescending comments to Mika every day for several hours.?...­.”
Michael Vick: Black Sheep or Scapegoat on Animal Rights?

Michael Vick: Black Sheep or Scapegoat on Animal Rights?

Commented Aug 22, 2009 at 19:26:50 in Green

“no argument..­...not condoning or minimizing the cruelty...­..i think my point is evident...­.and i don't need a " hint"...i get it.”
Common Sense 2009

Common Sense 2009

Commented Aug 22, 2009 at 19:21:18 in Politics

“An unlikely hero....co­ntinues to have something thoughtful to say....”
Advertisers Should Not Cancel Ads in Glenn Beck's Program

Advertisers Should Not Cancel Ads in Glenn Beck's Program

Commented Aug 20, 2009 at 00:04:12 in Media

“we agree most of the time Charlie, but not on this....Bo­ycotting is as essential to free speech as a soapbox.
The Reverand Wildman WAS effective as was Jerry Falwell by intimidating advertisers and distributors into repressing free speech and expression­....Advert­isers love exposure but hate controvers­y....so it is gratifying to some of us to see the purveyors of hate and right wing nonsense to feel the pinch of the pocketbook­...Boycott­ing is as American as Baseball.”
Michael Vick: Black Sheep or Scapegoat on Animal Rights?

Michael Vick: Black Sheep or Scapegoat on Animal Rights?

Commented Aug 19, 2009 at 23:30:44 in Green

“agreed, but animals are not people...t­here is no moral equivalent to genocide..­...”

seattle music replied on Aug 21, 2009 at 02:36:43

“Here's a hint: human beings ARE animals. We're animals of the species homo sapiens sapiens.

Dog's have the intelligence of two-year-old human beings, according to a recent study (no I do not have a link.)”
Michael Vick: Black Sheep or Scapegoat on Animal Rights?

Michael Vick: Black Sheep or Scapegoat on Animal Rights?

Commented Aug 19, 2009 at 11:15:53 in Green

“like the genocide in Darfur, the never ending war in Iraq....ch­ild abuse, the institutionalizing of kids by the public education system....­.those (i think) are somewhat more pressing issues than whether or not some football player shows remorse...”

QueenCeleste replied on Aug 20, 2009 at 06:02:10

“They are pressing issues, yes. But so is that of dogfighting and animal torture in our country. Why can't we address them all?

And I am not obsessed with Vick showing remorse. The issue is his crime.”
Michael Vick: Black Sheep or Scapegoat on Animal Rights?

Michael Vick: Black Sheep or Scapegoat on Animal Rights?

Commented Aug 19, 2009 at 00:23:12 in Green

“He doesn't have to show remorse (although it would be nice)...he did his time if he repeats the crime he will go to jail again.....­the issue of animal rights has been settled...­.like it or not Mr. Vick has a human right to earn a living. I am surprised that i am distracted by this kind of trivial issue....”

seattle music replied on Aug 19, 2009 at 04:00:46

“The torture of innocents is never trivial to the sane.”

QueenCeleste replied on Aug 19, 2009 at 02:36:52

“"Trivial issue?" Yes, it must be annoying to be distracted by such inconsequential matters. Better get back to your more burning issues.”

Tulka2 replied on Aug 19, 2009 at 00:52:13

“I agree. Vick could just walk into obscurity. He has paid his debt. Remorse not required, but that isn't what is happening here. Vick is being repackaged and sold like a product. We are being told we should "forgive him" when the real deal is they want us to buy him. They want us to step up and buy tickets. That's something else. I forgive him. I do not buy him.”
huffingtonpost entry

Big Radio's Attacks on Me Aren't Surprising

Commented Aug 02, 2009 at 18:36:26 in Entertainment

“the library paid for the book...the publisher got paid and so did the author...y­ou can borrow the book but you cannot legally copy it (without paying royalties)_ nor can you keep it...that is stealing.

Performers are not asking you to pay the royalties on radio played music...ju­st a share of the $$ that is already being paid to the publishers and the writers...­get it?”
huffingtonpost entry

Big Radio's Attacks on Me Aren't Surprising

Commented Aug 02, 2009 at 18:33:36 in Entertainment

“nice to read a post from someone in the business who still loves the music....y­our point about filling venues is not disputed here....bu­t with Live Nation' s business model becoming the new industry standard, it is going to be even more challenging for bands to find a place to perform...­.these are complicated times....m­any of us are lucky enough to perform fairly regularly to small attentive audiences.­...but i wouldn't want to have to depend on that revenue stream to support me.

thanks again for the nice words.”

heyjacent replied on Aug 02, 2009 at 23:58:47

“Ahh yes, the 360 deal, as they are now calling it. After piracy looted physical sales the new revenue streams for these guys are to get radio to pay more in royalties and cut a nice fat cut of your tour money, too. They take what they want and give the musicians the leftovers.

I hate seeing musicians and radio stations pitted against each other. We have a lot more in common than you might think. I can't believe this all started off a Dionne Warwick thread. I know she means well, but there is so much more to untangle here.

Cheers.”
huffingtonpost entry

Big Radio's Attacks on Me Aren't Surprising

Commented Aug 02, 2009 at 01:59:35 in Entertainment

“vertical integration still very much exists as do oligopolie­s......Bet­ween Bertlesman and Sony they control more than 90% of recorded music. Walmart and Apple control the majority of retail sales. There was a brief period from the early 1960s till the mid 70s when there was an abundance of independent record companies and some great stuff came out of it....then the lawyers and the suits moved in and it became a total tank of sharks. As a result most of the subsequent popular selling music stinks like dead fish.”

heyjacent replied on Aug 02, 2009 at 08:43:13

“You're spot on in most of your analysis here. I work in radio as an independent commercial broadcaster. I'm also one of those who still believe in radio despite the decimation of radio through the telecom act of 1996.

From an issue of basic fairness, you are not wrong. Those of us who have spent a lot of time in this business see this for what it is- Folks like Sony and Bertlesman and the like looking for another revenue stream. This is really a direct response to what piracy did to their business model. Radio will pay more in royalties, in will go to huge multinationals who will not be inclined to share, and the same people we are talking about- musicians- will get pennies on the dollar at best.

I'm not about to be put in a position where I have to cut some of my staff to make these payments to make shareholders for a multinational happy.

Artists do benefit from airplay, I've seen bands who couldn't sell out my garage do 5,000 seat venues in my market after a year of airplay. Touring is where it's at for these bands and I don't feel like I deserve their money for breaking those bands. I do it because I love music. I'm compensated from this commercial radio station and that's fine.

Most of the people on this board should simply buy the record or go to the show. We wouldn't even be talking about this otherwise.”
huffingtonpost entry

Big Radio's Attacks on Me Aren't Surprising

Commented Aug 02, 2009 at 01:54:44 in Entertainment

“performers are not given that choice....­that's the issue.....­so they do not have control and until recently lived at the mercy of the record companies.­....

don't know why i bother to respond...­.but again, you make no sense when you say that singers rip off writers...­not so...songw­riters and publishers encourage as many singers as possible to record their songs...th­ey do have the power to refuse the rights if they choose....­but they are making money regardless of who is singing the song as long as it is getting airplay or selling recordings.

there is nothing for me to "get over"....w­hy don't you try reading a book.”

Osusuki replied on Aug 02, 2009 at 15:09:34

“If performers have the power to start lawsuits against Napster, they can darn well generate the spine to deal with record companies. You can't have it both ways. Typical of them to go after the fans because they haven't the stones to go after the people who are really cheating them out of their just due.

By the way, you can read a book for free in the public library and not have some whiner come after you for royalties. Music should be the same way.”
huffingtonpost entry

Big Radio's Attacks on Me Aren't Surprising

Commented Aug 02, 2009 at 00:10:40 in Entertainment

“Many of these comments reflect a lack of understand­ing....Rad­io stations already pay pennies per song but NONE of that money goes to the singer or the musicians.­...the revenue is split between the record companies, the publishers and the writers...­.these deals were made years ago when "vertical integration" meant that the record companies were owned by the same companies that owned the TV and radio stations..­..CBS owned Columbia, RCA owned NBC radio I believe that ATCO was an ABC label....

Performers make their money through live appearances and licensing (T shirts, caps etc.)....t­hink about it, after reimbursing the record company for production, distribution and marketing there is little left in CD or MP3 sales to divide up among five band members (remember, managers take points out of everything.

Most performers are not wealthy...­..many die broke. Songwriting and music publishing are where the money is.....Pau­l McCartney is a billionaire as is Yoko Ono....bec­ause Lennon/McCartney wrote almost all of the songs....R­ingo and George did not fare as well.

i doubt if any of the people defending the radio stations (or those of you that do not pay for music) would agree to work for free under any circumstan­ces....why should performers­?...or would go into a store and shoplift (but that is what you are doing when you illegally download music)....­.it should be the performers right to be paid or to deny the radio stations the ability to "promote" them.”

MelRoy replied on Aug 02, 2009 at 06:28:21

“Michael Jackson bought the Northern Songs catalogue years ago.”

Righterthenthou76 replied on Aug 02, 2009 at 01:20:24

“Also, other then CBS, "vertical integration" you speak of no longer exists, so get over it and get artists to work out better deals with their record labels.”

Righterthenthou76 replied on Aug 02, 2009 at 01:18:34

“But performers don't "work for free" they get paid for concerts and albums and downloads they sell. The record labels take out too much, but that's between the label and the artist. Also, other then CBS, the intergration
And if an artist doesn't want the free publicity from radio, fine, they can pull there songs off the air and promote their work themselves, which would only further drain the supposedly limited resources. And now that you mention that songwriting is where the money is, what about artists who rip off others work and then want to get paid for singing a song someone else wrote? How "fair" is that. If you write you own songs, you can make money, if you don't then you shouldn't reap the rewards of those who do.”
next
1 - 25 of 75