HuffPost Social News

nightwind928's Comments (162)

View Comments:   Sort:
next
1 - 25 of 162
Dubai Has Always Been Bankrupt -- Morally and Environmentally

Dubai Has Always Been Bankrupt -- Morally and Environmentally

Commented Dec 14, 2009 at 11:25:56 in World

“A good quote to remember is .." A hundred years ago these people were living in tents in the desert. A hundred years from now they will be back living in tents in the desert."”
huffingtonpost entry

Why Politics-As-Usual May Mean the End of Civilization

Commented Dec 07, 2009 at 11:51:34 in Green

“To simply say that the United States is the cause of global warming is ridiculous. We do now and have in the past contributed to the problem in a disproportionate way to be sure, but the European countries and much of the industrialized Far East have been spewing carbon into the atmosphere for as long as we have. We are not the only industrialized country on the planet nor have we been for the last hundred years. To deny overpopulation as a major factor is to not see the forest for the trees.If you embrace science then the sheer weight of the math alone substantiates the conclusion for overpopulation as a major factor.”

busterbrownthefirst replied on Dec 07, 2009 at 17:19:35

“I forgot something. I'd like to see the statistics on how much of other countries' CO2 emissions are attributable to the United States by virtue of the goods and services they provide us. For example, if China is responsible for sending us everything from wall boards in Florida to what must be Walmart's entire inventory, well, how much of their emissions are directly attributable to us?”

busterbrownthefirst replied on Dec 07, 2009 at 17:03:01

“Of course overpopulation is a terrible crisis. But that just makes people starve to death. However, overpopulation doesn't have much to do with global warming if you live in a country without any particular industry. That's why Bangladesh is not really too high on the list of big polluters!

See page 189 of James Hansen's Storms of my Grandchildren. This incredible book will be released tomorrow, although my local bookstore already was shelving it a few days ago. Jim Hansen is arguably the best climate scientist in the world, so I'll go with him. Let's talk cumulative emissions: China: 9.1%. Germany and the U.K.: 6.5 and 5.8% respectively. The rest of Europe: 18.3%. India: 2.7%. And the United States? a whopping 27.2%.

So the message is that the U.S. has disproportionately screwed the rest of the world. Now China has only recently beat the U.S. in emissions. So billions of people have finally produced enough CO2 to trump a few hundred million of us. But even then, on a per capita basis, the U.S. is STILL so far ahead of China in energy consumption that it's a real joke.

Therefore, I'm still saying the United States needs to lead the fight against climate change because we are HUGELY responsible.”
huffingtonpost entry

Obama Should End Silence on Human Rights Abuses in Iran

Commented Dec 07, 2009 at 10:50:57 in World

“Human rights are not issues that are solely the responsibility of the United States to enforce. We live in a global society that has human rights violations on almost every continent. You hear very little from the Europeans on this subject and the middle east,who's people stand to lose or gain the most and where human rights are interpretative at best, says almost nothing on the subject. China is dealing with their own problems on this issue as are many other countries beside Iran. When the so called civilized countries of the world, collectively, join together to rail against human rights abuse, then America will stand at the forefront. But to say it's our "duty" to stand alone against every injustice on the planet is an idea that has come and gone as we deal with the stark reality of our own problems here at home.”

grn1 replied on Dec 07, 2009 at 11:51:32

“And why should we sacrifice our youth to other countries abuses through war, the most horrendous abuser of innocent human lives globally.”
huffingtonpost entry

Why Politics-As-Usual May Mean the End of Civilization

Commented Dec 07, 2009 at 10:19:09 in Green

“No sane person can deny the problems of global warming and pollution. But global warming is a symptom of something larger, overpopulation. As the worlds population continues to increase, so do the demands for the planets natural resources. As they are consumed at an increased rate the carbon used in production and use of those items is released into the atmosphere. Land is consumed as natural resources are displaced by the demand for the raw materials needed to satisfy the increased population. It's no mystery. We all wait in lines now that didn't exist twenty years ago. Traffic is clogged in every major city despite a frenzy of road construction. Housing developments displace meadows and farm land in every rural area. Shops and stores displace dairies and groves until it seems they almost connect at both ends. We are, by sheer numbers, over grazing our world. the population increases at a faster rate than our ability to keep up with the infrastructure and technology to support it. Meanwhile greedy, self serving politicians, worrying only about their political agendas, vacillate on doing what is necessary to head off disaster as millions more babies are born daily to increase the consumption cycle.”

goodspkr replied on Dec 07, 2009 at 13:18:51

“So what's your solution? Let mass starvation happen or eugenics? Or perhaps forced abortion.”

busterbrownthefirst replied on Dec 07, 2009 at 11:39:44

“In the main, the United States has caused global warming. Overpopulation didn't get us in our current situation. And now that India and China are finally developing enough to become major contributors to climate change, they appear to be taking global warming way more seriously than the U.S. Can you imagine how their countries will be affected by sea level rise, lower crop production, and wide-spread drought due to glacial melting? (And those are trivial problems compared to the more severe effects of global warming.)

It's a travesty that the United States is the only country in the world where the so-called "climate change debate" is split along political lines. How inconvenient science is if it actually calls for us to alter our energy structure! You know, global warming naysayers are incredibly stupid, as even if they were correct, don't we still have to resolve our energy problems because exporting energy sources is in direct contradiction to national security?

The rest of the world believes in science. I hope that the United States can adapt. It would be amazing if we would actually assume a leadership role in Copenhagen.”

kahalaman replied on Dec 07, 2009 at 11:25:06

“Well said. It's amazing how little concern is paid to this critical issue.”
huffingtonpost entry

It's a Helluva State

Commented Dec 06, 2009 at 12:47:04 in New York

“Here in Florida, same sex marriage isn't legal. It probably won't be anytime soon either, as this is a state populated by an aging demographic and right wing core values. However, where there's a will, there's a way. Wedding ceremonies ,as such, are not illeagle. There are may of us who as legal notaries, design and perform wedding ceremonies every day here for people of all orientations. They are just not legally valid without a state issued wedding license. But... we also can notarize Powers Of Attorney. These ARE legal documents and can be used to spell out what rights and privilege one person can extend to another. They are very powerful legal documents and if written properly, witnessed and notarized, can convey the same legal terms as any implied by a marriage license. They can name specific details of an arraignment and can not be dismissed out of hand in any court. They allow another to make medical decisions on another's behalf, make financial decisions and other personal choices they may wish to share. Most important, they can not be legally disputed on a gender basis. When properly written and exchanged in a ceremony, they can be almost as good,contractually, as a marriage license. Something to think about and investigate further as an alternative to finding a way around the obstacles.”
huffingtonpost entry

It's a Helluva State

Commented Dec 06, 2009 at 11:30:05 in New York

“It's time for New York and the rest of the "anti gay" states to take this thing further. No more marriages between Catholics and Jewish people or Christians and Moslem's And Protestants can marry but not Methodist with Baptist or Lutherans with Mormons etc. Of course interracial marriage is completely out of the question, in fact, if someone has a tan the shade of Bohner's, they should be considered suspect. Republicans should not be allowed to marry Democrats (this would spur way to much political controversy) Independents could marry, but only if they pledged to vote with the far right on election day. Dog lovers could not marry cat lovers. Age limits should be carefully scrutinized. If someone is more than 3 years older than the other they would be excluded. Nobody over the age of 65 either, I mean whats the point, they're too old anyway right? Those who prefer Chevy's wouldn't be allowed to marry those who drove Ford's either.( If you drive a Chrysler product you can't marry at all.) Now you may think this is ridiculous but it makes as much sense as the same sex exclusions.”
huffingtonpost entry

How Do I Make My Marriage Last?

Commented Dec 06, 2009 at 10:55:53 in Living

“If your marriage is in pain feel free to go to www.facesoftheheart.com. No spam, or anything bad....just someone that has spent years as a reationship coach who will be glad to help. Life's too short and marriage too important to not try to save it.”
huffingtonpost entry

It's a Helluva State

Commented Dec 06, 2009 at 10:46:28 in New York

“People shouldn't have to move to Europe or anywhere else to get fair treatment. ...that's the point here. If your church, private group or fraternity doesn't want to embrace the policy of same sex marriage then don't practice it and exclude anyone from joining your group. But the laws of the land in the United States of America aren't supposed to be discriminatory against ANYBODY and shouldn't be unduly influenced by your group because it's contrary to their practice.”
America Without a Middle Class

America Without a Middle Class

Commented Dec 03, 2009 at 11:29:05 in Business

“Those in power are very conscious of the possibility of social uprising. They got a taste of it in the 1960's and it scared them to the point that they directed our own troops to fire on unarmed citizens at Kent State. They control the power completely now and they have contingency plans for just such a possibility. They don't have to shoot anybody anymore. They can just turn off the water and electricity or stop the food from arriving and close the roads for awhile. The majority of Americans don't have the stomach or willpower for insurrection, especially any prolonged campaign that such a venture would require.Those who would be required to lead such a revolt would be discovered and incarcerated quite quickly in todays electronic era. The idea is the stuff of novels and movie scripts but in reality, it's too far a reach for all but a few anarchist dreamers.”
America Without a Middle Class

America Without a Middle Class

Commented Dec 03, 2009 at 11:07:18 in Business

“There will always be a middle class, however,there is no doubt that the middle class is becoming redefined. The majority of middle class have, up to this point, been baby boomers who will shortly enter retirement age. Many, myself included, now are engaged in raising grandchildren or redefining retirement. I deliver goods to many "snowbird" retirees in Sun City Fl. (A large retirement community) . They are the last generation to enjoy the fruits of that lifestyle. A nice home up north, one in Florida, fancy golf carts, etc. They are the last of the "double dippers" and it's certain that our generation will never be able to live in that style in our 'golden years'. But it's a trade off because we live far better now than they did when they were our age. Perhaps the lesson they leave us is that it's o k to live with less today to have more tomorrow...an idea we seem reluctant to embrace. It's certain that the middle class will no longer be able to enjoy the limitless excess they have come to accept as their normal standard of living. In the end, there will be a middle class as always. It just won't have quite the shine on it as it did in the past.”

oldwhitewomantoo replied on Dec 03, 2009 at 12:25:55

“The question is, can we, as as culture, go back to those ways without feeling totally deprived? Our culture now thinks that everyone deserves a flat screen 40-50 inch TV, 300 channels, fast food or high-end prepared food for every meal, and the list can go on & on.

It will take 20 years for the culture to shift back to a more simple lifestyle.

Can we do it? I hope so -- otherwise, we all be working into our 80's to pay for the current lifestyle we try to maintain.”

vanceali replied on Dec 03, 2009 at 11:38:13

“I appreciate that someone else is pointing this out. And I don't think this is redefining it as not starving. You can have a wonderful life without a lot of stuff people seem to think we need these days. The problem with the middle class is the problem with every class it seems--we all "need" way too much stuff!”

ibsteve2u replied on Dec 03, 2009 at 11:17:38

“It sounds like you're redefining "middle class" as "not starving".”

MarcusT replied on Dec 03, 2009 at 11:12:50

“Well stated.”
Why I Changed My Mind On Afghanistan

Why I Changed My Mind On Afghanistan

Commented Dec 01, 2009 at 11:20:33 in World

“To win any war , you must have a clear, realistic goal that defines victory. I haven't heard anyone define that goal. I hear about routing the Taliban, but the Taliban aren't an army, they're a movement and you can't route a movement with battlefield tactics.I hear about political stability but this last ridiculous excuse for an election proved that isn't a viable option.There's the stability of Pakistan, but that isn't incumbent on a victory in Afghanistan either. War,even for clear reasons is terrible. For unclear reasons, it's the worst thing a nation can engage in. We fought two world wars for clearly defined reasons and won them because the entire country was unified in that victory. We haven't won another since because the entire country was split and the reasoning for them was flawed. Now, like some shell game, we just change the goal lines that define victory to mollify everyone who is dumb enough to buy into that logic. We won't win this one either, because there is no clear winnable goal post and we let the politicians keep moving the shells around, showing us the pea underneath when it suits them. This just cost us lives,loads of money and the good will of the rest of the world, who's people are reluctant, themselves, to get involved in any significant way because they understand the futility of the situation.”

drkazmd65 replied on Dec 01, 2009 at 12:49:34

“Exactly nightwind928.

Everyting wrong with our campaign in Afghanistan either stems directly from, or leads directy to this fact.

We don't have a realistic idea what is is that we want to achieve there, or for that matter what we can achieve there.”

indc replied on Dec 01, 2009 at 11:53:12

“I agree... whatever could be won in Afghanistan was won in the first six months.....
the corruption is pervasive, including Karsai and his family of heroin manufacturers and dealers

This is Obama wanting to appear like his has some spine and conviction, and like Bush and Cheney before him using other people's bodies, minds, and families to gain what he never in his life possessed, any real courage to go against any established interests. He backed down from Olympia Snowe, Lieberman, and the rest... he is another chicken-hawk using other people to prove his manhood. He should send his kids to school in Afghanistan until he is ready to bring the troops home.. he needs to put some skin in the game, not simply his useless, untrustworthy rhetoric and spineless behavior.”

ftforthfoodie replied on Dec 01, 2009 at 11:43:05

“Well-said. Fanned.”
President Obama's Answers to My Questions

President Obama's Answers to My Questions

Commented Nov 21, 2009 at 11:02:22 in World

“Yes you had free education and health care in Cuba before Castro...but only about 12 percent of the nations population could take advantage of it..The rich sugar and tobacco plantation and rum factory owners and their family's got the chicken and the rest of the population got the feathers. And if they complained too loudly Batista's corrupt goons in the SIM would "disapear" them. I have been to Havanna twice since 1985 so I know from wence I speak. For the privileged class, life was beautiful, but for most others, who sweated in the fields and factories, it wasn't so good. If it had been, Castro would never have even gotten a foothold there.”

elghergo replied on Nov 22, 2009 at 08:39:06

“I had a teacher, a priest by the way, that said it is useless to give water to a thirsty-less donkey. Cuba was a whorehouse before Castro, a jewish mafia stronghold, and people then was just as miserable and dispossessed as Haitians are today. Socialist Cuba educated whole generation of Cubans and Caribbeans in general making them competent professionals. Cuba exports doctors to the world, not freedom torturers, and Obama has a pretty hard face to be talking about freedoms and human rights considering the record in Afghanistan, Iraq and now Pakistan. Quite a hard face for a war criminal like his predecessor.”
President Obama's Answers to My Questions

President Obama's Answers to My Questions

Commented Nov 20, 2009 at 17:34:19 in World

“I have lived as a kid in the 50's when the "Red Hoard" were destroying our country from the farthest corners of the world...at least according to the Joe McCarthy's anyway. Now, 6 decades later I don't know why it was so frightening and neither does anyone else who has lived through this history. Communism never quite worked as advertised and went the way of the Edsel for the very reason that it doesn't work.. If it could have worked, it would have been in Cuba where the model was more refined. But due to the embargo, that experiment in government was doomed to fail out of hand. When the Russians came and brought their style of Communism, it was a disaster for everyone concerned. But things did improve on many levels for the population. Free health care ( which even we don't have to date) Free education through college and a few other things proved to be good ideas. But the infrastructure crumbled without U S dollars and a siege mentality by Castro ( not completely unjustified) destroyed the idea of a real socialist society before it could truly be tested. The real loss is to the Cuban people..and possibly all of us here at home as well. But now Communism is not an issue anywhere anymore. The "red hoard" was a paper tiger that never bit us. It's time to rethink our policy with Cuba and it's people and move on into the 21st century.”

SigmundF replied on Nov 20, 2009 at 19:25:57

“Sorry, unfortunately I have to inform you that we had free education and health care in Cuba long before Castro...... please people, get the facts about the Cuba that castro destroyed before assuming all the propaganda says..... Cuba's social welfare before Castro was over several European Countries and #3 in America..... To comprehend that you have to understand that Cuba was a very rich and developed country even before of getting its independence.”
President Obama's Answers to My Questions

President Obama's Answers to My Questions

Commented Nov 19, 2009 at 17:53:24 in World

“If those in the exile community still, after six decades, entertain illusions about returning to Cuba in some victorious parade to regain what they left so many years ago, they are kidding themselves. Cuba will never entertain their claims of ownership to anything no matter how much political pressure they think they have here at home. In the mean time they continue to inhibit the normalization of relations with a country that should be a stop on cruise ship routes instead of on some crazy, out dated embargo list. They put their bets on a corrupt, mob owned dictator named Batista and when the wheel of life stopped in 1959, they lost. That's gambling ..too bad, so sad. The whole country shouldn't have to pay off their gambling debt forever, anymore than it has to pay it off for all the other dictators that have come and gone in the world over the years. Castro isn't right, but then neither is the Priemere of China or the Saudi Royal Family or a couple of dozen others we openly embrace in normal relations with. We prop up Kharzi in Afghanistan who's a complete villian...so what's the beef?”

Pluribus Unim replied on Nov 20, 2009 at 14:35:12

“so when the Castros finally die - every communist in Cuba should have their homes and businesses seized since they now will be on the wrong side of history

see your dumb logic?”

SigmundF replied on Nov 19, 2009 at 19:13:54

“You are right..... the only people that propagandizes this supposed pretensions of Cubans in exile are Castro agents and tyranny lovers.”

Tulka2 replied on Nov 19, 2009 at 18:01:39

“I agree with you and am only half-kidding when i observe so many problems, here and in Cuba would be solved if we make a gift to Cuba of Miami.”
Schmidt Calls Palin's Memoirs

Schmidt Calls Palin's Memoirs "Total Fiction"

Commented Nov 16, 2009 at 07:17:06 in Politics

“Palin's book, whether fact or fiction, will do exactly what she intended it to do....make her a bundle. She is about as bad a political candidate for any office as anybody could wish for, but that doesn't make her stupid. She's gone from someone who nobody but a few, misguided Alaskan voters even knew to a world recognized figure and picked up more than a few nickels in the process. The reason she stepped down as Governor was that it was getting in the way of making money. There isn't a day that goes by that she isn't on this site and almost every other one as well. She's the darling of every talk show and even Oprah considered her a feather in her cap to have on her show. She lives and breathes because of her stardom, not because of her political ability. She is the Paris Hilton of politics, nothing more, but that's enough to keep her in the spotlight with no talent nobody's like Jon and Kate and enough to insure her book makes it to the best seller list whether it is nothing more than a thick, poorly written comic book or not.”

creolechild replied on Nov 16, 2009 at 09:18:20

“Night, thanks for your keen observations on this topic.

Last month, almost to the day, Arianna Huffington was on the Ed Shultz show and in reference to the Balloon Boy story said, "Why continue the wall-to-wall coverage of a story that had turned into a non-story -- on a political show -- during a week when health care, financial reform, and Afghanistan are all at the tipping point?"

My question: Why is the exact same scenario being played out on this site with the domination of Palin-related articles? Today, if you browse between the Home, Politics, and Media sections of HuffingtonPost you'd find approximately 28 articles about and/or related to Sarah Palin. Some of these articles are duplicated once or twice on the same page while others have simply been moved to another section.

Is HuffingtonPost experiencing a similar "inability to break its addiction to these kinds of non-stories -- be they shark attacks, missing blondes, or celebrity trials?"

Enough already...”

lindabear replied on Nov 16, 2009 at 08:00:26

“I agree and her fifteen minutes of fame will go on forever. Thanks, Oprah you lost a viewer.”
Mothers and Sons: How Close Is Too Close?

Mothers and Sons: How Close Is Too Close?

Commented Nov 15, 2009 at 17:38:59 in Living

“If you love with anything but an open heart, your cheating yourself and those you direct your love at. Don't let some misguided,overeducated fool with a college degree cause you to worry about "loving too much"....only about loving too little... and remember that just because someone doesn't love you the way you want them to, doesn't mean they don't love you with all they have.”
huffingtonpost entry

Did Pacquiao Make Web History?

Commented Nov 15, 2009 at 13:11:34 in Technology

“Don't bet the ranch on it”
huffingtonpost entry

Did Pacquiao Make Web History?

Commented Nov 15, 2009 at 13:07:16 in Technology

“There's a reason that Manny is a favorite of the fans..actually many reasons. He, like many boxers, comes from the streets and has risen to the top on his own skill and performance. He is a gentleman out of the ring and doesn't live a life of extravagant excess or get into trouble in his personal life. Even the few detractors he might have pay homage to his unquestioned skills. For many of us, he is is the little guy who wins the good fight by virtue of his great heart and tenacity...an inspiration to the rest of us little guys, fighting everyday to survive in life's ring against opponents that would beat us down. He isn't handsome, charismatic or flashy...but he's a winner and that's why so many of us will always be cheering for him from the first bell. We love ya Manny!”

robc317 replied on Nov 15, 2009 at 14:15:02

“It also doesn't hurt that he doesn't shoot his mouth off like Mayweather. He seems humble and just happy to be in the position he is.

And I second the earlier poster who said Floyd is running away from Pacquiao. The only reason this fight hasn't already happened is because Floyd is a chicken s**t and won't let it. Floyd... quit running your mouth, man up, and take on Pacquiao. It's the fight everyone wants to see... make it happen!”
huffingtonpost entry

Marriage Equality and the Myth of "Gay Apartheid"

Commented Nov 12, 2009 at 11:10:56 in Politics

“It's too bad that this has turned into a "racial divide". Because when someone splits up any group that stand for the rights of EVERYONE then both sides lose. The pure truth is that we all suffer when ANY group of our citizens are excluded from the rights and privileged that are guaranteed under the umbrella of the American flag. To compare one color to another in the struggle for equality is to compare apples to oranges..equality is for all of the people no matter what their color may be. You might as well argue that one color is "gayer" or "straighter" than another and therefore less deserving of equality.”
huffingtonpost entry

What the Gay Boycott of the DNC Can Do

Commented Nov 10, 2009 at 23:54:56 in Politics

“Everything is impossible...until it done. I am an old man now, yet in my lifetime I saw a man walk on the moon..impossible. I watched the Berlin wall come down and the soviet Union dissolve..impossible. I watched as polio was eradicated..impossible. I watched a black man, who would have had to drink form a segregated water fountain when I was a kid, be elected to the White house, and your going to tell me that people uniting behind a cause to save their country is impossible? I have learned that NOTHING is impossible when people choose to make it possible.”
Quitting Meat: A Process Of Change

Quitting Meat: A Process Of Change

Commented Nov 10, 2009 at 20:07:03 in Living

“What is up with all these "Pro Vegan" posts on here lately? This is the third one in just a few days. Are the vegans suddenly overwhelming society? I don't think so. I don't see any more vegetable stands suddenly popping up where bar-b-que trailers used to be. Grilling burgers and hot dogs (or steak for the Republicans) is still the best way to bring in the 4th of July. I doubt grilling a tasty artichoke will replace that idea very soon. I don't see any Kentucky Fried Turnip franchises being sold. Perhaps theres a reason. Maybe it's because vegetables are great side dishes... with things like chicken and pork chops. I like vegetables...and meat too. Most people feel like me. Being a staunch vegan is not an idea that will take off like a brush fire for most of us any time soon. So why the ink here Huff-Po? There are many more interesting and controversial issues to be advanced than arguing over carrots and broccoli vs bacon and eggs. And most of us like them both anyway ( well...to be honest, my granddaughter doesn't really like broccoli that much, but I'll probably still let her keep her last name anyway)”

provoked replied on Nov 10, 2009 at 21:21:02

“I think you've missed the whole point of the article - Nothing is "instant"... It's about gradual change and choices made each day. If I were an entrepreneur I certainly would be looking at the "trend" and invest my efforts into something other than unsustainable (and cruel) industries. Likewise as a consumer I would also be encouraged by NEW KNOWLEDGE to make better choices. No, it won't happen over night... But rather in increments, gaining momentum as awareness of the issues grow. I admire HP for seeing future "headlines" - Today! The subject touches on every facet of the problems we face today... Nothing could be more serious an issue that "Eating Animals".”

Soliel replied on Nov 10, 2009 at 20:56:05

“It's being discussed because meat eating has huge implications for animals, us, the environment and other people. HUGE.

Just to let you know...vegans don't just eat veggies. We eat heartier and "meatier" fare as well, but it's not meat. You can still enjoy BBQ's as a vegan just choose meatless burgers. There are tons to choose from, grill them like regular meat and you have a very similar experience.

Please, vegans eat hearty food, too.”
huffingtonpost entry

What the Gay Boycott of the DNC Can Do

Commented Nov 10, 2009 at 19:44:25 in Politics

“The thing to consider here is that when a two party system is all you have, and the choice is between bad and worse, you don't really have any choice. To deny the best of the worst any chance of success is only to empower the worst of the worst. But there's hope!. We do have an independent party in America and it has grown stronger. Many who have fled the craziness of the Republican camp and many who can't tolerate the Democratic lies have officially changed their voter registration status to Independent. Thats a lot. All we need is a viable, credible leader to come to the fore. If one did, and we channeled all that money we have been wasting on these louts who have shown themselves as political wolves in sheep's clothing, we could really make some changes. We start by organizing goos independent candidates to replace those Congresspeople and Senators who have shown themselves as the liars and cheats they are in this last year. We CAN do this, but we have to change our thinking and get the right people onboard. It has been done before, it can be done again and it needs to be done now if were ever to get our country back.”

Epiphany2b replied on Nov 10, 2009 at 22:34:53

“Not workable, because the very definition of Independent is that we are not in any way connected to any party, nor are we likely to be willing to all march in the same band. The primary reason politicians declare themselves to be Independents is when neither the Dem or Repubs want them, or if the parties already have candidates in that particular race. I'm an Independent liberal; a friend of mine is an Independent conservative. Since it is not exactly a party, with a chairman, or funding of any kind, there is no reason why someone can't run for president as an Independent. That would be interesting; there would be no puppeteer!! Other than big business/corporate ones, anyway.”

TomOfVirginia replied on Nov 10, 2009 at 20:46:35

“Nice pipe dream. Of course, those who label themselves "independent" are far more diverse in their views than either of the 2 major parties already are. So finding a candidate who will appeal to an ultra-conservative who thinks John McCain was a commie, and also to an ultra-liberal who thinks Obama is too conservative, will be an impossible task.”
huffingtonpost entry

Don't Ask Me About Hasan

Commented Nov 07, 2009 at 14:13:08 in World

“Your point is moot Alexa07. Everytime there is controversy in the Catholic Church the media parades priests and church spokespeople across the screen. The same is true when Jewish problems arise and Rabbi's are interviewed or the Dali Lama speaks on Buddhist issues. Every other segment of the population from the BoyScouts, military Generals and women's rights activist are asked about things that are in their sphere of knowledge to better inform the rest of us. Are you saying that the Moslem community should be exempt from providing anyone for meaningful discussions at times like these...and what would be your reasoning? It would seem that YOU are the one with an "axe" to grind my disillusioned friend.”

Intelligentia replied on Nov 07, 2009 at 15:12:12

“nightwind928,

You are stretching for cover and the more you stretch the more you expose the falacy of your argument. Let use you last example as a guide. You state:

"Jewish problems arise and Rabbi's are interviewed or the Dali Lama speaks on Buddhist."

Is Mr. Dajani an Imam? I'm afraid he is not. You know full well the media bias when it comes to Muslims. So, predending that your comments are those of a neutral oberver is not fooling any learned mind. If your intent was not to hold every Muslim responsible for actions of one individual who may or may not be a Muslim, you failed. Everyone who claims for be a Muslim may not be a Muslim in practice but may be in theory, just like your Catholic priests who molest(ed) children may call themselves Christians in theory but are not in practice.”

alexa07 replied on Nov 07, 2009 at 15:06:26

“Disillusioned? I think not, rather I am questioning your use of this incident to hold all Muslims accountable when you clearly don't for the other groups you cite.”
huffingtonpost entry

Don't Ask Me About Hasan

Commented Nov 07, 2009 at 13:20:16 in World

“If you chose to interpret my post as something negative, then you have gone to a lot of trouble for nothing. I have no axe to grind and I thought this was obvious but, of course, you can read into it anything what you want it to say. The "we" vs."them" thing won't fly because "We" are all Americans (unless you have chosen to not be a citizen). As to how you got the McVey-Hitler thing a condemnation of Moslems...well that was a real stretch on your part. I hoped that people would not condemn the Moslem community out of hand for this terrible deed done by one crazed person and some articulate people in the Moslem community would come forward to help disparage that notion. Just as I hope people don't condemn all Catholics (of which I am one) because of the misdeeds done by some predatory priests. Don't try to light a fire where there is none. There is enough hate to go around without stirring up anymore.”

alexa07 replied on Nov 07, 2009 at 13:49:40

“Nightwind,
No axe to grind? Well, that can't be anything but good including the inclusion of Muslim Americans in the "we" rather than having "them" as separate from other Americans & needing to account for every criminal act, as you were asking for in your previous commentary. Speaking out on their behalf is not "stirring up" anything; it is reminding readers that spokesmen of other religions are not routinely asked to account for the actions of their criminals, the focus of Jamal's excellent article.”
huffingtonpost entry

Don't Ask Me About Hasan

Commented Nov 07, 2009 at 12:19:34 in World

“I can understand Mr. Dajani's angst at these questions. On the surface they seem shallow and inconsiderate. But many good people are trying to make some logical sense out of this tragedy and have no where to turn for their answers. We don't hear much from the Moslem community about anything, except when they speak out against the discrimination they feel in their respective communities. This is an opportunity for many in the Moslem community to come forward and speak to people who need answers instead of letting them come to their own wrong conclusions. It is at times like this that they can do themselves much good by letting the country know that they are with the rest of America in their grief and defuse the hate that will be perpetrated by those who will use this to further inflame anti Moslem sentiment. To be silent on these matters will be mistaken as guilt by omission by many. Mc Vey and Hitler are poor examples of a defense,and long gone from many peoples living memory but 9-11 and terrorism are still fresh and the scars still deep. The argument is apples vs. oranges to a lot of people. Silence is not golden for the Moslem community right now.”

alexa07 replied on Nov 07, 2009 at 12:54:14

“"We don't hear much from the Moslem community about anything, except when they speak out against the discrimination they feel in their respective communities."

So it's "we" & "they" instead of "us" Americans? I think your advice for the Muslim community is a thinly disguised attempt to disparage by (1) pretending American Muslims are somehow not part of the entire country (2) refuting double standard arguments about other criminals whose religions are not held up to the same level of examination (3) arguing that Muslims must not remain silent, meaning they must be guilty by association (4) dismissing McVeigh & Hitler as "long gone from many peoples living memory but 9-11 and terrorism" are not. Of course many would disagree with you about McVeigh & Hitler as being "long gone" from any such discussion, but you also appear to be using this incident to make every American Muslim accountable for these criminal acts. Not at all fair or reasonable, & it leads me to believe you have a very sharp axe to grind.”
next
1 - 25 of 162