omeo2013's Comments (48)
The Republican Way: Keeping Everything The Way It Is
Commented Nov 25, 2009 at 00:07:12 in Politics
“Oh yeah, because private health care has done a bang-up job of keeping us healthy without bankrupting us. Nevermind that America has a lower life expectancy, higher infant mortality rate, more preventable deaths, more cases of cancer, heart disease, obesity, and every other major cause of death than almost any country with public health care. All those tax-payer-funded government services we enjoy are just terribly run, aren't they? We need the private system to provide our fire departments, police departments, libraries, postal service, maintain our roads, etc. You're absolutely right.”
The Republican Way: Keeping Everything The Way It Is
Commented Nov 25, 2009 at 00:00:26 in Politics
“Y'mean those Canadians that are rich enough to AFFORD to pay America's exorbitant health care prices? What about those Americans who decide to move and live across the border so they can have free health care? I guess we could put a stop to that, too.”
The Republican Way: Keeping Everything The Way It Is
Commented Nov 24, 2009 at 23:55:57 in Politics
“I disagree with you, Mr. Baldwin. The G.O.P does not want to maintain things as they are. They want to take us BACK to the way things WERE. Y'know, in the 1950's; or possibly the 1450's.”
sfg1ant replied on Nov 25, 2009 at 00:10:44
“Not the brightest in the family, are you?”
Obama, Democrats Face Liberal Fundraising Boycott
Commented Nov 13, 2009 at 15:25:50 in Politics
“If people didn't act during the Bush administration, nothing will make them do it.”
omeo2013 replied on Nov 14, 2009 at 00:33:29
“Right. You'll just be a collaborator for the G.O.P. Thanks.”
Joehio replied on Nov 13, 2009 at 19:16:47
“When people did react after the Bush disaster, the reaction got co-opted by the pseudo-progressives who are currently occupying the White House. So there you go. I won't be a collaborator any more. The candidates I vote for may lose every time, but at least I won't be a collaborator.”
Obama, Democrats Face Liberal Fundraising Boycott
Commented Nov 13, 2009 at 13:18:03 in Politics
“One more thing. You're right; the Republicans aren't lying to you. They're openly telling you that they well feed you to the top bidder if you're foolish enough to let them.”
Obama, Democrats Face Liberal Fundraising Boycott
Commented Nov 13, 2009 at 13:16:11 in Politics
“"Little difference between Democrats and Republican s." You are willfully ignoring reality, here. Look, I realize there have been some disturbing similarities of late, but that is simply untrue. I know it's easy to lose sight of the important difference between the two when all you do is focus on their similarities, but their differences are numerous and significant. Just look at the health care debate. Don't let the media focus on the Blue Dogs convince you that the Democrats are against health care reform. The Democrats are trying to make many important and long overdue changes in that area alone. Who has given the gay community the rights they have today? The Democrats. Who has fought against those rights every step of the way? The Republicans. Who supports social welfare programs to help the poor, the young, the sick, and the old? The Democrats. Who's against lifting a finger or spending one penny to help someone once they're out of the womb? The Republicans. I could go on.
For God sakes, people, don't let a few similarities between the two parties fool you into thinking they're the same. That's just ignorant. It's a blatant disregard for the facts. Do you really imagine that the Republicans WOULDN'T make things worse if they were in power? What you're saying is that things were just as bad under George Bush and Tom Delay. No difference, right?
To quote Barney Frank,"On what planet do you spend most of your time?"”
For God sakes, people, don't let a few similarities between the two parties fool you into thinking they're the same. That's just ignorant. It's a blatant disregard for the facts. Do you really imagine that the Republicans WOULDN'T make things worse if they were in power? What you're saying is that things were just as bad under George Bush and Tom Delay. No difference, right?
To quote Barney Frank,"On what planet do you spend most of your time?"”
Obama, Democrats Face Liberal Fundraising Boycott
Commented Nov 13, 2009 at 09:32:45 in Politics
“One single defeat does not equal a "major shift". Besides, this article is proof that there are civil wars brewing on both sides. I don't think we're that much better off than they are. What do you think would've happened in NY 23 if the DNC approved candidate had lost the nomination to a more progressive candidate? I'm not saying they would've lost, but I'm not sure they would've won; not in a district the G.O.P has held since the civil war.”
Obama, Democrats Face Liberal Fundraising Boycott
Commented Nov 13, 2009 at 08:39:56 in Politics
“Thank you. One of the most self-destructive things about progressives is that we're so ready to eat our own. We whine and moan when change doesn't happen fast enough while the conservatives stick together and get things done. They're crazy, but they're not stupid.”
Obama, Democrats Face Liberal Fundraising Boycott
Commented Nov 13, 2009 at 08:33:28 in Politics
“Look, you want to send a message to the Democrats? Let your Congressmen know that you'll be supporting more progressive candidates in the primaries; but don't abandon the party. Withholding a donation to the Democrats is tantamount to giving it to the Republicans instead. It's suicide. The bottom, line is, the Democrats suck, but the Republicans suck a lot more. I happen to think the latter part of that statement is more important than the former. You can rest assured that the tea-baggers will not abandon their party so quickly.
Mark my words; DADT will be gone by the end of 2011 at the outside. Keep your pants on. Obama knows he has to deliver on that or he'll lose the gay vote. DOMA will be around for another decade or so and that is not the Democrats fault. The majority public opinion is still against gay marriage and will be for some time. The Democrats aren't getting on board until we reach at least 60% nationwide.
Calm yourselves and start supporting more progressive candidates, if you like, but let's not do anything as stupid as giving Congress to the Republicans. If they regain power, you'll regret it and you'll WISH you'd supported the Democrats. Don't forget that.”
Mark my words; DADT will be gone by the end of 2011 at the outside. Keep your pants on. Obama knows he has to deliver on that or he'll lose the gay vote. DOMA will be around for another decade or so and that is not the Democrats fault. The majority public opinion is still against gay marriage and will be for some time. The Democrats aren't getting on board until we reach at least 60% nationwide.
Calm yourselves and start supporting more progressive candidates, if you like, but let's not do anything as stupid as giving Congress to the Republicans. If they regain power, you'll regret it and you'll WISH you'd supported the Democrats. Don't forget that.”
cminca replied on Nov 13, 2009 at 15:08:18
“If the democrats miss my funding contributions (Obama, DCSS, DCCC, DNC) I'm sure that they can make up the difference with all the new donations Rick Warren's followers are contributing.
After all--isn't inclusiveness the reason Obama kicked us to the curb--the first time?”
After all--isn't inclusiveness the reason Obama kicked us to the curb--the first time?”
Burnsey replied on Nov 13, 2009 at 13:41:22
“I'm sorry, but I never abandoned the Party. The Party abandoned me. For goodness sake, we control Both the House and The Senate and our guy is sitting in the White House, and they can't even get the basic stuff done. Please, they left the left a long time ago, and sorry, but I am tired of being told every two years that we need to wait until the "NEXT" election before they can do anything. They do not plan on doing anything, and it is painfully apparent to us all. I'm so sorry that there are so many DNC apologists out there. I gave way more than I could afford over the last 8 years, in order to help get this majority and this majority has its collective head up it's collective butt.”
Obama, Democrats Face Liberal Fundraising Boycott
Commented Nov 13, 2009 at 07:24:15 in Politics
“You're all making the Republicans very happy right about now. You think the far right is going to abandon their party because they don't think the Republicans are conservative enough. Of course they're not. That's one of the differences between them and us. They're smart enough to remain united because they know what would happen if the other side gained power. This isn't rocket science, people.”
satanlite replied on Nov 13, 2009 at 14:16:21
“It's not "rocket science" to GET SOMETHING DONE. Fulfill the CAMPAIGN PROMISES.
Only fools will fall for them again.”
Only fools will fall for them again.”
M1 replied on Nov 13, 2009 at 12:46:32
“Being united for the wrong purpose simply fails to inspire.”
DuPageDem replied on Nov 13, 2009 at 09:22:15
“United, sure. Just ask the Rethug leaders in NY 23. We're seeing a major shift in how voters see their parties, and how the parties see themselves. Lead, follow, or get flattened.”
Obama, Democrats Face Liberal Fundraising Boycott
Commented Nov 13, 2009 at 07:20:04 in Politics
“So you're going to let the Republicans take over? As if they'd do any better? Not only would they fail to advance your freedoms, they'd likely erode away some of the progress we've made AND YOU KNOW IT. Stop being so short-sighted.”
Mike Kilpatrick replied on Nov 13, 2009 at 12:10:32
“Aguynamed is right since there seems to be very little difference between Democrats and Republicans on the issues I care about I see little point in giving to the Democratic party. At least he Republican aren't lying to me.”
Obama, Democrats Face Liberal Fundraising Boycott
Commented Nov 13, 2009 at 07:17:42 in Politics
“So your answer is to hand the country over to the Republicans? Brilliant strategy. Look, I'd rather the country be controlled by the party that's passively trying to do the right things than the party that's actively trying to do the wrong things.”
satanlite replied on Nov 13, 2009 at 14:15:26
“In a word, YES. Let the Republicans destroy the country. Maybe people will be act.”
Obama, Democrats Face Liberal Fundraising Boycott
Commented Nov 13, 2009 at 00:43:40 in Politics
“Y'know what, folks, I'm not entirely happier with the Democrats either, but that's no reason to deprive them of the funding they need to defeat Republicans. Like it or not, the Democrats ARE the lesser of two evils. As bad as you think the Democrats are, the Republicans are always worse, so congratulations on your suicidal plan to help the Republicans regain power next year.”
omeo2013 replied on Nov 13, 2009 at 07:24:15
“You're all making the Republicans very happy right about now. You think the far right is going to abandon their party because they don't think the Republicans are conservative enough. Of course they're not. That's one of the differences between them and us. They're smart enough to remain united because they know what would happen if the other side gained power. This isn't rocket science, people.”
AguynamedWayne replied on Nov 13, 2009 at 06:57:16
“Evil is Evil. And I will no longer support either. I am tired of being lied to by the Democrats. When they want our gay money and our gay votes they make a lot of promises and then they shove us to the back of the bus and forget about us as soon as they get elected. NO MORE! From now on, MY EQUALITY COMES FIRST! NO MORE WAITING.”
stop7997 replied on Nov 13, 2009 at 03:08:06
“For decades Democrats have taken our votes for granted because they are "the lesser of two evils". No more.”
How Lieberman Stole Reid's Candy and Drank Snowe's Milkshake
Commented Oct 29, 2009 at 13:44:03 in Politics
“I still don't think that answers my question. Why would MORE people vote for the Republicans who stood in the way of getting us the reform most of us want? I would think LESS people would vote for them; especially if they succeed.”
hp blogger M.S. Bellows, Jr. replied on Nov 03, 2009 at 01:06:07
“It's a good question. The answer lies in the facts that (a) not everyone votes in general elections, and in most places only registered Republicans can vote in primaries, and (b) if a politician doesn't win the primary, he/she doesn't even get a shot at winning in the general election.
If the super-conservative Republican base (currently only 25% of voters are registered R) hates healthcare reform, then every GOP politician in a strongly Republican district has no choice but to oppose healthcare reform, or a more conservative newcomer will challenge (and possibly defeat) them in the primary election in which only registered Republicans (usually) can vote. The Congressional race in NY-23 is a great example: a moderate Republican has completely bowed out because a Teabagger independent who calls Glenn Beck his "mentor" was outpolling her.
So to even have a shot at running in the "real" election, Republicans have to act like Teabaggers. They'll worry about the rest of the voters if and when they make it that far.
Hope this is clearer!”
If the super-conservative Republican base (currently only 25% of voters are registered R) hates healthcare reform, then every GOP politician in a strongly Republican district has no choice but to oppose healthcare reform, or a more conservative newcomer will challenge (and possibly defeat) them in the primary election in which only registered Republicans (usually) can vote. The Congressional race in NY-23 is a great example: a moderate Republican has completely bowed out because a Teabagger independent who calls Glenn Beck his "mentor" was outpolling her.
So to even have a shot at running in the "real" election, Republicans have to act like Teabaggers. They'll worry about the rest of the voters if and when they make it that far.
Hope this is clearer!”
How Lieberman Stole Reid's Candy and Drank Snowe's Milkshake
Commented Oct 28, 2009 at 09:13:21 in Politics
“Can someone please explain something to me? I don't understand how this can be good for the Republicans. For at least the second time, they've stood in the way of health care reform. This time, it's reform that a great majority of the public supports. Common sense would dictate that this would make them look bad and hurt their chances of gaining seats next year. Common sense would say they should LOSE seats next year. How would defeating much needed, popular reform win them more seats in Congress? It's so counter-intuitive I can't wrap my mind around it.”
hp blogger M.S. Bellows, Jr. replied on Oct 28, 2009 at 13:54:53
“EbonBear's right. Also, the excessive gerrymandering that Delay pulled off has resulted in Congressional districts that are highly concentrated with wingnuts; there are few moderates represented by the seats the current Rs hold, so no need to appeal to them. Further, GOP registrations are down: more Independents now, and the Rs that are left (and vote in primaries) are the hardcore Right. You can see this in the way Teabaggers are attacking Lindsey Graham: ANY hint of moderation can expose a Republican congresscritter to a primary challenge.
So, bottom line, Congressional Republicans are scared not for the general election, but for the primaries; once they appease the red-meat crowd there, then they hope the big corporate donors can get them the general-election win.”
So, bottom line, Congressional Republicans are scared not for the general election, but for the primaries; once they appease the red-meat crowd there, then they hope the big corporate donors can get them the general-election win.”
EbonBear replied on Oct 28, 2009 at 11:38:05
“The Repubs are currently undergoing a quiet civil war within their own ranks between the reasonable conservatives (who can see the problems you outlined above) and the bat**it extremists, the crowd who supported Bush right to the end, think his big problem was not being right-wing enough and essentially think Obama is Satan. Currently, the loons seem to be running the show.
They're relying on A) being able to blame Obama for not doing anything about healthcare (because they killed it) and B) a re-run of 1994. Their problem is that firstly, America is a very different country from 1994; secondly, Poppy Bush was relatively harmless compared to his son's catastrophe and thirdly, the Republican party is WAY further to the right than they were in 1994. Essentially, if you place the centre at 50 of a 100-point scale (fascists at 0, commies at 100), the 1994 Republicans were about a 35 or 40. Today's Republicans are about a 15.”
They're relying on A) being able to blame Obama for not doing anything about healthcare (because they killed it) and B) a re-run of 1994. Their problem is that firstly, America is a very different country from 1994; secondly, Poppy Bush was relatively harmless compared to his son's catastrophe and thirdly, the Republican party is WAY further to the right than they were in 1994. Essentially, if you place the centre at 50 of a 100-point scale (fascists at 0, commies at 100), the 1994 Republicans were about a 35 or 40. Today's Republicans are about a 15.”
Keep Going, Republicans! You're Doing Great!
Commented Oct 22, 2009 at 03:02:22 in Politics
“I think you could just shorten that down to "It's time for another party to step in."; preferably a more progressive one than the Democrats have turned out to be.”
catrst replied on Oct 22, 2009 at 06:54:04
“Our problem is corporatists and dixiecrats in the democratic party in Indiana. Hopefully the democratic party will change under new leadership and elected officials will be held to a higher standard.”
Keep Going, Republicans! You're Doing Great!
Commented Oct 21, 2009 at 21:09:08 in Politics
“I still think people who are declaring that the Republican party is dead are being WAY too optimistic. I'll believe it when I see the body; meaning I'll believe it if they get crushed again in 2010 and 2012 or if we see the rise of a new liberal party that pushes the Democrats to the Right where they belong and pushes the Republicans off the ballots.”
danceswithtrees replied on Oct 21, 2009 at 22:46:00
“First non delusional post I've seen here. Keep thinking the Repubs are dead. We thought the same in 2004. What comes around...”
Maybe Conservatism is Dead?
Commented Oct 20, 2009 at 22:55:31 in Politics
“This is too good to be true. We're not that lucky. I'll believe it when I see the body.”
The Impeachment of President Obama
Commented Sep 24, 2009 at 03:15:05 in Politics
“Let's not forget that none of these ludicrous attacks would work if one third of the country wasn't just BALLS-OUT STUPID! That's right; I said it. One out of every three voters in America is aggressively DUMB and that's why swallow these Right-Wing talking points hook, line, and sinker.”
veracity replied on Sep 25, 2009 at 13:24:48
“the REASON that "one-third of the country is BALLS-OUT-STUPID" is because the WASHpost, NYSLIMES, CNN/TIme/Warner, Fox 'news', (Moonie Times, Scaife papers), and other "major media" 'news' organizations are ABJECT LIARS, pushing a
- "Tax-Cuts for rich" (= "loot the treasury"),
- MORE WARS,
- police-sta te-powers, &
- CONCENTRATION of wealth-and-power in hands of an insanely greedy few" Agenda.
WHEN the local yokels see "ACORN fraud!" "ACORN corruption!" "ACORN HATES AMERICA!" on their TVs every night, while the Times, Post, CNN, and other corporate media WHITEWASH & CENSOR the crimes and atrocities and BLATANT CORRUPTION of BLACKWATER, Halliburton, and other corrupt companies. ...
... then, imho, the Local Yokels (even if they are more likely to be violent) deserve LESS scorn & condemnation, than the LYING, malicious MEDIA ELITES who WHIP THEM ON, with a BLATANTLY LYING, propaganda, "appear to be THE OPPOSITE of what you really are" agenda.
(for example: turning the Clinton's overnight Guest List into the "LINCOLN BEDROOM SCANDAL!"
(as IF the president of the UnitedStates NEEDS PERMISSION to invite AMERICAN citizens over for the night)
- WHILE GIVING PresBush a FREE PASS
- for inviting CONVICTED FRAUDSTER KEN LAY to spend nights, & , hell, the TImes, Post , & NY/DC media couldn't even bother to ask Bush White House
- "HOW MANY TIMES did CONVICTED BRIBER OF CONGRESS _JACK ABRAMOFF_ visit your White House?"
- (or GAY MALE PROSTITUTE Jeff Ganon visiting the White House with daily repeated Press Passes - despite his UP & RUNNING homosexual”
- "Tax-Cuts for rich" (= "loot the treasury"),
- MORE WARS,
- police-sta
- CONCENTRATION of wealth-and-power in hands of an insanely greedy few" Agenda.
WHEN the local yokels see "ACORN fraud!" "ACORN corruption!" "ACORN HATES AMERICA!" on their TVs every night, while the Times, Post, CNN, and other corporate media WHITEWASH & CENSOR the crimes and atrocities and BLATANT CORRUPTION of BLACKWATER, Halliburton, and other corrupt companies.
... then, imho, the Local Yokels (even if they are more likely to be violent) deserve LESS scorn & condemnation, than the LYING, malicious MEDIA ELITES who WHIP THEM ON, with a BLATANTLY LYING, propaganda, "appear to be THE OPPOSITE of what you really are" agenda.
(for example: turning the Clinton's overnight Guest List into the "LINCOLN BEDROOM SCANDAL!"
(as IF the president of the UnitedStates NEEDS PERMISSION to invite AMERICAN citizens over for the night)
- WHILE GIVING PresBush a FREE PASS
- for inviting CONVICTED FRAUDSTER KEN LAY to spend nights, & , hell, the TImes, Post , & NY/DC media couldn't even bother to ask Bush White House
- "HOW MANY TIMES did CONVICTED BRIBER OF CONGRESS _JACK ABRAMOFF_ visit your White House?"
- (or GAY MALE PROSTITUTE Jeff Ganon visiting the White House with daily repeated Press Passes - despite his UP & RUNNING homosexual”
Flavor replied on Sep 24, 2009 at 06:27:55
“omeo2013, I feel you but I would say they believe these people they support but you know what I found out people don't do their own research. You see omeo213, I learned the hard way but it taught me from experience I may listen to you but because we live in a day and time where gossip, heresay, sells I do my own research because everything ain't a fact that is put out there, people twist and turn a matter and make it real and to find out later it was a lie, so you also have people who are just not use to change and will not ever change so you know who you can change yourself we can educate our children and grandchildren and that is how you stump out hate.”
jamiso replied on Sep 24, 2009 at 06:01:21
“I think that's about right.
Historically its always been the case, I think. What has always made America great is that our top 1/4 is really really really awesome, and we need them in full action, because that bottom 1/3rd is a real killer, when they have power”
Historically its always been the case, I think. What has always made America great is that our top 1/4 is really really really awesome, and we need them in full action, because that bottom 1/3rd is a real killer, when they have power”
Barack Obama Must See Michael Moore's New Movie (and So Must You)!
Commented Sep 23, 2009 at 14:04:20 in Business
“What all of Moore's films point to are a need for campaign finance reform. America will never reach it's potential as long as wealthy private interests can buy Congressmen with "campaign contributi ons." We're going to have a hard time getting affordable health care, proper gun-control, or a well-regulated market place until we get rid of corporate personhood.
Those who criticize Moore for making emotionally appealing arguments (which he IS guilty of) are throwing the baby out with the bathwater and ignoring the documented facts he presents. Yeah, he plays the heart-strings, but he isn't lying.”
Those who criticize Moore for making emotionally appealing arguments (which he IS guilty of) are throwing the baby out with the bathwater and ignoring the documented facts he presents. Yeah, he plays the heart-strings, but he isn't lying.”
WritusMaximus replied on Sep 27, 2009 at 11:26:06
“And the folks that will write these reforms are the very same that benefit from the current system with its bribes, er, campaign donations.”
peanut replied on Sep 27, 2009 at 09:48:09
“I agree 100%. Having done volunteer work for a senator-elect, I saw how much time and effort went into organizing fundraisers to finance his campaign against the incumbent. There are far too many millions of dollars needed to even think about running for office, much less being successful against those already in power and funded by the big corporations. If you think the so-called "nickel and dime" online contributions, go far to cover expenses and pay for media access, think again. Until reform is enacted, the system will not change.
P.S. The candidate I worked for won the election. Now, he is part of the system.... a good guy but how long before he is won over by the corporations and the lobbyists. Time for term limits and campaign reform!”
P.S. The candidate I worked for won the election. Now, he is part of the system.... a good guy but how long before he is won over by the corporations and the lobbyists. Time for term limits and campaign reform!”
AngerAndDetermination replied on Sep 24, 2009 at 01:33:50
“Why should he be pronounced "guilty" of making emotionally appealing arguments? If I am trying to determine whether someone is in love, or whether an action by government constitutes a war atrocity, I know it when I see it. There is nothing wrong with showing people a reality that appeals to their emotions. The prosecution is entitled to the legitimate moral force of its evidence.”
coco38 replied on Sep 23, 2009 at 15:06:06
“Amen! (in the pagan sense). i think Moore's emotional appeal is to get people to understand this isn't about OTHER PEOPLE this is about US. and I don't blame him a bit.
and though i voted for obama, i agree with Moore, he needs to remember who put him there and stop taking money from corporate interests which he has. i just hope in the end he doesn't end up being a run of the mill president but i'm holding out for now. i really don't think this healthcare reform will be for the people but for big business as usual as they LOVE the "mandatory healthcare insurance bill" my son is 19 and will no longer be carried on my health insurance (he's not enrolled in school this year since we can't afford it and we're trying to stay away from student loans so he looking into scholarships and grants) he has asthma and i have no idea what he'll do. he has two jobs with one offering health benefits but he can't afford it!!! people between the ages of 18-27earn less than $20,000 a year.
i just wonder, why is obama making these types of concessions????”
and though i voted for obama, i agree with Moore, he needs to remember who put him there and stop taking money from corporate interests which he has. i just hope in the end he doesn't end up being a run of the mill president but i'm holding out for now. i really don't think this healthcare reform will be for the people but for big business as usual as they LOVE the "mandatory healthcare insurance bill" my son is 19 and will no longer be carried on my health insurance (he's not enrolled in school this year since we can't afford it and we're trying to stay away from student loans so he looking into scholarships and grants) he has asthma and i have no idea what he'll do. he has two jobs with one offering health benefits but he can't afford it!!! people between the ages of 18-27earn less than $20,000 a year.
i just wonder, why is obama making these types of concessions????”
Change, Not a Restoration: The Death of Conservatism and Rebirth of Reform
Commented Sep 02, 2009 at 01:34:03 in Politics
“I hope he's right, but I fear he may be giving the voters and the media too much credit; neither is that smart. I'd love to believe that the Republican party really is dying, but I think it's too good to be true. I'll believe it when I see the body. Even if the Republican party dies, the disease of conservatism will just infect the other party. The Democrats are already disappointingly conservative.”
Change, Not a Restoration: The Death of Conservatism and Rebirth of Reform
Commented Sep 02, 2009 at 01:20:07 in Politics
“And the Republicans are any better about decifit spending? Let's not forget (as many have or will) that the Republicans created this debt largely through their own deficit spending. At least the Democrats make an attempt to PAY for their spending. Yes, Obama may be adding to the debt, but it's a debt the Republicans created and he's doing it to fix healthcare which, if he didn't, would create a lot MORE debt down the line. It's a shame so many voters can't put that together.”
Wake-up replied on Sep 02, 2009 at 19:44:19
“Are you kidding me??
W left office with roughly 1.5 Trillion and Obama just 'mis-projected by $2 Trillion and $10 Trillion deficit in 10 short years (See the Congressional Budget Office for details).
How are the Dems making an attempt to cover $10 Trillion? Obama (and a leftist Congress) has been absolutely reckless in 7 short months - new all-time record.
Why don't you put it together for me... how is spending another $1.5 - $3 Trillion (notice the "T") is going to save $10 Trillion or worst case what would be $13 Trillion? - If the Administration could actually make this case, they would have done so a long time ago... make no mistake, this is about power and control fueled by ideology - nothing more.
The people are speaking and they don't want it.”
W left office with roughly 1.5 Trillion and Obama just 'mis-projected by $2 Trillion and $10 Trillion deficit in 10 short years (See the Congressional Budget Office for details).
How are the Dems making an attempt to cover $10 Trillion? Obama (and a leftist Congress) has been absolutely reckless in 7 short months - new all-time record.
Why don't you put it together for me... how is spending another $1.5 - $3 Trillion (notice the "T") is going to save $10 Trillion or worst case what would be $13 Trillion? - If the Administration could actually make this case, they would have done so a long time ago... make no mistake, this is about power and control fueled by ideology - nothing more.
The people are speaking and they don't want it.”
New Rule: Smart President ≠ Smart Country
Commented Aug 07, 2009 at 16:41:37 in Comedy
“He's absolutely right. America is a breath-takingly stupid country. We actually believe socialized healthcare is a bad idea when it's worked pretty well for just about every other country in the industrialized world. We think that marijuana is more dangerous than alcohol and tobacco despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. The only reason Obama won is because the Republicans decimated the economy, but as soon as that's fixed-or as soon as we're attacked again-they'll forget all about the damage the Republican platforms lead to and let the fox guard the hen house again.”
Obama: Stop Driving Americans - and White House Guests - To Drink
Commented Jul 28, 2009 at 18:02:25 in Politics
“Ask a cop if they'd rather get a call to break up a house full of drunks or a house full of stoners. We'd be better off if people were getting baked instead. Do you know how much alcohol is involved in murder and domestic abuse in America? Stoned people don't get angry very easily and when they do, they almost never get violent. The same cannot be said for drunk people.
I love the irony of drinkers arguing against marijuana before cracking open a beer, too. "Those degenerate stoners oughta be locked up." (Pssht! Chug. Chug.) What a bunch of hypocrites. Why is it okay to get drunk off your face, but you're some kind of low-life if you smoke pot?”
I love the irony of drinkers arguing against marijuana before cracking open a beer, too. "Those degenerate stoners oughta be locked up." (Pssht! Chug. Chug.) What a bunch of hypocrites. Why is it okay to get drunk off your face, but you're some kind of low-life if you smoke pot?”
JimR replied on Jul 29, 2009 at 09:38:18
“Agree 100%.”
CJWebber replied on Jul 28, 2009 at 20:38:02
“You are so right about a roomful of drunks vs a roomful of stoners. There is absolutely no comparison.
Those who are most vocal about the 'evils' of pot are the ones who know the least about it. I don't smoke pot, but I know a lot of people who do, and they are successful business-owners, athletes, musicians and engineers. I would much rather be around a pot smoker than a drinker.”
Those who are most vocal about the 'evils' of pot are the ones who know the least about it. I don't smoke pot, but I know a lot of people who do, and they are successful business-owners, athletes, musicians and engineers. I would much rather be around a pot smoker than a drinker.”
Sarah Katherine replied on Jul 28, 2009 at 19:06:26
“The story of the smear campaign is well documented in this video, "The Union: The business behind getting high"
http://pat ients4medi calmarijua na.wordpre ss.com/200 9/04/24/th ebusinessb ehindgetti nghigh/”
http://pat
Sarah Katherine replied on Jul 28, 2009 at 18:43:19
“Tokers are seen as low life dirt bags due to the very successful smear campaign taking place for the past 70 years and continuing to this day on a weed so threatening to some industries it is widely accepted as evil and just plain wrong, no proof needed.
Cannabis legalization would take away profits from pharmaceutical companies, paper companies and the plastic industry.. . how would they feed their children?
Better to use pills and plastics, alcohol and trees than to utilize the evil weed, they will have us believe.”
Cannabis legalization would take away profits from pharmaceutical companies, paper companies and the plastic industry..
Better to use pills and plastics, alcohol and trees than to utilize the evil weed, they will have us believe.”
Lobbyists on a Roll: Gutting Reform on Banking, Energy, and Health Care
Commented Jun 26, 2009 at 12:41:42 in Politics
“It sounds like if Obama wants to deliver on all this change he promised us, he's first going to have to deal with the lobbyists who are choking the life out of any real progress. The problem is, it's not really up to him. It's up to Congress and they're owned by the lobbyists. Let's make lobbying reform the top issue next year.”
AbbieXHoffman replied on Jun 26, 2009 at 13:59:27
“it's not lobbying reform. it's campaign finance reform.”
textynn replied on Jun 26, 2009 at 13:14:13
“Some people won't live that long.”


