HuffPost Social News

poomplet's Comments (253)

View Comments:   Sort:
next
1 - 25 of 253
We Must Replay the Match

We Must Replay the Match

Commented Nov 23, 2009 at 11:02:57 in Sports

“Yeah, but your game...and every other professional sport in our country...­.uses video replay to veryify scoring in some way.

Football, B-Ball & Hockey can & do use it to review and, if necessary, overturn any & all scoring opportunity controversies, and baseball uses it more selectively.

And all of those sports...e­ven hockey...i­nvolve MANY more scores & scoring opportunities per game. In soccer, where 2-1 equals a scoring frenzy, it's more than obvious that video replay should be used.”
Meatless Monday: History Lesson

Meatless Monday: History Lesson

Commented Nov 23, 2009 at 10:52:27 in Green

“You're right...bu­t there are LOTS of vegetarians/vegans who incorrectly claim that humans are not omnivores.­..that we are not designed to eat meat at all. They have a bunch of prescribed, totally bogus talking-points at the ready, ignoring some of the more basic facts like that no pure herbivores have ANY of the enzymes necessary to digest meat, yet we have them all.

I don't understand that mindset...­that they somehow NEED to believe this in order to justify their choice. I'm fine with their choices as-is...ju­st don't try foisting your beliefs/judgment on me.

And note that the indigenous peoples...­who had been untainted by contact with other cultures & had a plethora of dietary choices...­they ate "a variety of roasted meats" (and fish).

The genetic drive to survive clearly incorporates meat eating; even the most militant vegan will salivate..­.against their will...at the smell of cooking meat when they are hungry.”

KristinNoelle replied on Nov 23, 2009 at 16:54:43

“Humans CAN eat meat, but the general consensus is that it was never meant to be the mainstay of our diet. Our ability to digest meat probably evolved to allow us to survive during periods of time when it was difficult to find food.

If you think about it, we don't have the claws or the speed to hunt, and fire wasn't invented until relatively recently (from an evolutionary perspective) so our ancestors meat intake was probably limited to randomly finding a recently killed rodent.”

EuroMom replied on Nov 23, 2009 at 11:07:16

“just to set the record straight, poom -- I'm not actually a vegetarian­., though I was for many years (not out of animal-rights convictions, but for other reasons). Now I eat meat again. But basically I just tend to follow my cravings, which are mainly for veg/nuts/p­ulses/frui­t and I eat meat once or twice a month -- and then usually in the form of a big, fat, juicy, rare steak...”
Bats: The New Canary in the Coal Mine?

Bats: The New Canary in the Coal Mine?

Commented Nov 20, 2009 at 12:03:25 in Green

“Something like 60% of the world's bats reside in South & Central America.

HMMMMM...c­ould it be "Peruvian Marching Powder"?

Just say NO, lil' bats!!!!”
Bats: The New Canary in the Coal Mine?

Bats: The New Canary in the Coal Mine?

Commented Nov 20, 2009 at 11:54:39 in Green

“The reflexive.­..and TOTALLY unsubstant­iated...ac­cusations being hurled at Monsanto & global warming are both frightening & hilarious at the same time.

I guess H1 N1, AIDS & autism are their fault, too. My son got a liver transplant at 13 mos. due to biliary atresia, a disease known for over 100 years that doctors STILL don't have a cause for (non-genetic, non-infectious, happens 3X more to babies born in winter/cold than summer/mild, it's a rather fascinating disease when viewed objectivel­y...though it sucks if it happens to you).

Sometimes crap just happens...­there isn't always a boogyman.”

midwesthousewife replied on Nov 23, 2009 at 00:12:47

“Yes, crap happens, but that isn't the same as introducing, usually unintentionally, non-native diseases, insects, and other animals into ecosystems and disrupting the balance of the system in ways that may be catastrophic. And in this day and age, these introductions are frequent and devastating.

Look at what has happened to our native trees in the last 75 years--first it was the American chestnut, then the American elm, then the flowering dogwood, the hemlock, now the ash trees and the pine trees and the spruce trees--all being decimated by foreign insects or diseases. Where is this leading? The problems of the honeybees and the bats have major consequences for us all. The ecological web is complex, but start plucking out individual strings and the whole thing begins to weaken, and possibly come crashing down.”
huffingtonpost entry

Where Is the Real Al Gore and What Have You Done With Him?

Commented Nov 18, 2009 at 16:30:20 in Green

“99% of humans don't care a wit about animal rights & veganism.”

dapperd72 replied on Nov 18, 2009 at 18:11:54

“I rest my case about why the homo sapiens species is such a pathetic excuse for DNA with too few exceptions.”
huffingtonpost entry

Where Is the Real Al Gore and What Have You Done With Him?

Commented Nov 18, 2009 at 14:04:35 in Green

“WorldWatch magazine = "top scientific authorities"?

I think not...espe­cially when emissions from ALL of agriculture are less than 1/4 that of power generation.

Not to mention all the co2 that is scrubbed/eliminated by the plants grown to feed animals is never factored in by the vegan studies.

Keep this up....link­ing climate change to militant animal rights/veganism can only help marginalize this pseudo-science & prevent $trillions$ of wasteful spending.”

greenwriter replied on Nov 19, 2009 at 01:22:01

“What's WorldWatch? The article's stat is cited from the UN and leading climate change study groups. Whose stats are you reading? Factory Farmer Daily?”
Another Divisive Wall

Another Divisive Wall

Commented Nov 15, 2009 at 02:28:48 in World

“When Jordan opens up it's borders to unfettered travel & immigration from 'Palestine', THEN the queen might have the moral foothold to talk like this. Until they do, this is rather transparent hypocrissy”

LegalCodex replied on Nov 15, 2009 at 04:55:17

“Also if they would like to apologize for Black September, that would be nice.”
huffingtonpost entry

Why the Stupak Amendment Is a Monumental Setback for Abortion Access

Commented Nov 10, 2009 at 01:52:02 in Politics

“This is bunk...as anyone willing to pay 100% of the cost would not even NOTIFY their insurance plan. They go to a clinic and whip out a check/Visa­...case closed!

And as others have said, very few, if any, insurance plans ANYWHERE cover elective abortions.­..so what exactly is being lost?

And...plea­se...stop the empty posturing. You will not stay home, no matter what Obama/Congress does/doesn't do. Even a moderate like me sees that the next elections are going to be VERY tough for Dems, so unless you want to lose both majorities & then see Jeb in the White House..you­'re gonna do something about it.”

AOK2 replied on Nov 10, 2009 at 19:41:02

“You have no clue what insurance plans are and are not offering coverage for abortions. And we forget the comments being posted regarding insurance coverage (whether it is Aetna, Blue Cross/Shield, Coventry, etc) is most likely employer based coverage. Most employer based coverage is self-insured with the insurance company acting as the plan administrator. So employers can dictate to the carriers the coverage limitations such as prescription tiers, birth control, chiropractic care, and yes abortions.

I wish people who do not know what they are talking about or who do not have the mental capacity to thoroughly evaluate their thoughts would choose to listen and learn rather than speak.”

Artemis34 replied on Nov 10, 2009 at 18:05:36

“This article states:

"Eighty-seven percent of employer plans offer abortion coverage."

http://www.guttmacher.org/media/inthenews/2009/07/22/index.html

GardenerNorCal replied on Nov 10, 2009 at 08:15:43

“Why should we be concerned that another Bush might be elected? It would appear the democratic policy motives are the same. For me it would be worth electing another Bush if only to prove to the elected oficials that they are accountable for their voting records. I am tired of being told that we have to compromise our civil rights in order to keep a certain party in office that apparently doesn't value my civil rights.

What the entire country should be rallying around is the ratification of ERA. It only needs three states. And if it had been ratified years ago we might not be having this discussion.”
<em>Ishtar</em> Lives! <em>Men Who Stare at Goats</em>

Ishtar Lives! Men Who Stare at Goats

Commented Nov 09, 2009 at 14:40:18 in Entertainment

“Funny...I'­ve seen a few reviews here that echo your inconsolable loathing..­.but somehow 57% of critics liked it, according to RottenTomatoes.

I certainly won't be viewing it.”

Chazzam replied on Nov 10, 2009 at 01:21:29

“Sorry, meant to be a general response and not one to your post.”

Chazzam replied on Nov 10, 2009 at 01:20:31

“There's more drama in this review than most movies. Still holding a grudge for not getting invited to the release party I see.”
Even If They're Right, the <em>Superfreakonomics</em> Guys Only Have Half an Answer

Even If They're Right, the Superfreakonomics Guys Only Have Half an Answer

Commented Oct 29, 2009 at 13:51:22 in Green

“Rooftop solar is NOT forever...­.cheaper, or all that green.

Cuz nobody ever talks about the impact of STORING the electricity generated during the day so it can be used at night. Banks of batteries are hugely expensive and they need to be replaced at certain intervals, and they utilize extremely toxic materials (lithium, lead, acids, etc.).

People never talk about the batteries, clearly because their negatives quickly balance/outweigh the positives of the solar cells themselves.”

ericd96 replied on Oct 30, 2009 at 12:58:35

“Electric energy does not have to be stored in batteries. You can store energy in a mechanical flywheel. You use energy to get the wheel turning and then latter use the turning wheel to regain the energy by having it run or act as generator. Some energy is lost due to friction, (although you could use a maglev flywheel but then you would loose energy to generate the magnetic field I suppose), but some energy is always lost in either the storage or transportation of energy.”

research replied on Oct 29, 2009 at 16:17:58

“GRID CONNECTED.

NO BATTERIES.

try again.”
Doug Hoffman Wins an Olympic Gold Medal, Gets Reagan Elected and F***s a Rat

Doug Hoffman Wins an Olympic Gold Medal, Gets Reagan Elected and F***s a Rat

Commented Oct 28, 2009 at 20:20:07 in Politics

“Yeah...the­re have NEVER been any Congressmen elected who have money and zero experience­..

I'm utterly SHOCKED.”
Where We Are as Women (In Film)

Where We Are as Women (In Film)

Commented Oct 28, 2009 at 17:39:00 in Entertainment

“Women decide where 75% of movie $$ are spent. ..that's not good enough?

Apparantly, "Sex In the City", "Mamma Mia" "Twilight" and every lame rom-com coming out aren't 'women' enough for you, and you gloss over the fact that Amelia got panned & women DID vote with their wallets...­not to see it. Jane Campion's "Bright Star" is supposed to be amazing...­but clearly, not enough women care to see it to make it a big success

The woman in Paranormal Experience is stronger than the guy..it's doing great. "Drag Me to Hell"....s­ame thing. WOMEN filmgoers made "The Hangover" one of the biggest movies of the year...WOM­EN are the reason Mama Mia, The Proposal, & every other lame rom-com make enough money to keep 'em coming.

You don't have a problem with Hollywood.­..you don't have a problem with how women are portrayed in most major movies. You have a problem with WOMEN...wi­th how most women PREFER seeing fluff flicks where women are stereotypical "I need a man" roles.

THAT is a real issue...Ho­llywood is RESPONDING to the majority of womens' cinematic wants & desires...­they're not creating them!!”
huffingtonpost entry

For Roman Polanski

Commented Oct 28, 2009 at 11:32:00 in Entertainment

“No state in the USA has an age of consent lower than 16, unless the 'offender' is within a few years of the age of the victim (romeo/juliet exceptions). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_North_America”

rzan1 replied on Oct 28, 2009 at 15:45:44

“That just shows how old I am. You are right. I believe it used to be the age of 15 in my state. Thanks for the correction.”
huffingtonpost entry

For Roman Polanski

Commented Oct 28, 2009 at 11:06:16 in Entertainment

“Not to mention fleeing from prosecutio­n...THAT is as important as the sex charge (more, legally...­as it was bartered down to such a trivial charge).”
huffingtonpost entry

For Roman Polanski

Commented Oct 28, 2009 at 10:54:23 in Entertainment

“Speaking of recidivist­s....peopl­e on both sides seem to forget/gloss over the fact that wiithin 1-2 years of fleeing the US on this rape thing, he took 15 y.o. Nastasia Kinski as his 'lover'.'

As Mr. Rogers would ask..."Can you say PEDOPHILE? I thought you could!"”

rzan1 replied on Oct 28, 2009 at 11:16:05

“He is not a pedophile. Pedophiles are those who seek out sex with prepubescent children. In the state I live in, 15 is legally the age of consent . Ms. Kinski was definitely not a child. I agree that men who have a proclivity for teenagers are extreme creeps, but in most cases it is not criminal. Also, pedophilia is a pathology. A psychiatrist did judge that Mr. Polanski was unlikely to re-offend.”
Jonathan Safran Foer's <i>Eating Animals</i> Turned Me Vegan

Jonathan Safran Foer's Eating Animals Turned Me Vegan

Commented Oct 27, 2009 at 22:09:39 in Books

“EVERY herbivore has the ability to digest cellulose

Humans cannot process/digest cellulose AT ALL.

NO herbivore has hydrochloric acid in their digestive juices. Humans do, albeit not in the same concentration as full-blown carnivores.

Case closed...w­e're omnivores.”
Jonathan Safran Foer's <i>Eating Animals</i> Turned Me Vegan

Jonathan Safran Foer's Eating Animals Turned Me Vegan

Commented Oct 27, 2009 at 22:00:19 in Books

“WOW...coul­d you BE any more wrong?

The most strident vegan on the planet will salivate..­.involunta­rily...at the smell of meat cooking if he or she is hungry.

That is only part of the evidence that we are hard-wired for a diet of plants AND animals.”

Brendan H replied on Oct 27, 2009 at 22:52:50

“If I grilled up some human flesh, I'm pretty confident most people would naturally salivate at the smell of it. That doesn't mean we should eat it.”
Jonathan Safran Foer's <i>Eating Animals</i> Turned Me Vegan

Jonathan Safran Foer's Eating Animals Turned Me Vegan

Commented Oct 27, 2009 at 17:23:23 in Books

“Yes, we were...and of course, still are....'de­signed' to eat & digest meat: http://www.beyondveg.com/billings-t/comp-anat/comp-anat-1a.shtml

Pema replied on Oct 27, 2009 at 20:42:10

“poomplhet.­..beef stays in your digestive tract for 24 hours. what is beef like after sitting in 98 degrees with no breezes? we were gathering way before hunting, our bodies have adjusted to a degree, but not to the point where we digest meat very well. and lets not forget about the filthy factory farming...­people who work in packing houses are under edeucatedpaid little, work when sick, don't follow fda and usda "recommendations' regarding e coli or downed cows, the fda or usda does not enforce much. veg, its just cleaner for our bodies, the planet etc. ever see a peta vid? the best way to go right now imo, is to eat less of it, instist on better conditions for animals, no antibiotics or hormones added. i think we need to evolve and i am grateful for people speaking on having a kinder footprint.”

saranac7 replied on Oct 27, 2009 at 17:33:47

“and you are 20 times more likely to die of cancer as a result...s­o eat up!

http://www.thechinastudy.com/
Jonathan Safran Foer's <i>Eating Animals</i> Turned Me Vegan

Jonathan Safran Foer's Eating Animals Turned Me Vegan

Commented Oct 27, 2009 at 16:15:20 in Books

“Jesus seemed OK with the fishing industry at the time”

KillgoreTrout43 replied on Oct 27, 2009 at 16:28:47

“Exactly. Are fish different than other living beings? Actually, fish is a main staple in the Mediterainian area. They don't have alot of grazing land and forests.”
Jonathan Safran Foer's <i>Eating Animals</i> Turned Me Vegan

Jonathan Safran Foer's Eating Animals Turned Me Vegan

Commented Oct 27, 2009 at 16:02:26 in Books

“Yeah..I went there...th­ere are at least TWENTY postings!!”
Jonathan Safran Foer's <i>Eating Animals</i> Turned Me Vegan

Jonathan Safran Foer's Eating Animals Turned Me Vegan

Commented Oct 27, 2009 at 16:00:01 in Books

“I'll check it out...I'm sure it's totally unmoderated & allows all kinds of opposing viewpoints!!”
Jonathan Safran Foer's <i>Eating Animals</i> Turned Me Vegan

Jonathan Safran Foer's Eating Animals Turned Me Vegan

Commented Oct 27, 2009 at 15:07:11 in Books

“There's a fundamental problem when one, like Natalie, tries to shift from practitioner to activist on this topic...

There are no poor vegans.

Go to Appalachia, inner cities, Africa, China, the slums of RIo and/or 90% of the world's populace for that matter...t­ry to pitch THEM on the moral imperative & health benefits of going vegan.

That's the problem here...Nat­alie et al aren't pitching VEGETARIAN (and semi-vegitarian, which is REALLY what we should aim for) diets/lifestyles, their activism is aimed at full-blown veganism. They know that once you say "...well, sustainable fish are OK...and throw in some free-range chicken now & then.." the MORAL, 'killing god's creatures is evil" part of their argument is totally tossed out the window.

But they IGNORE the fact that only the wealthy & highly educated can live healthily on a vegan diet.

There are lots of vegetarians in India (even more semi-veggi­es)...very few vegans, because THEY CANT' AFFORD IT (nor can most Americans/­Europeans)­.

Vegans are in a tricky, elitist predicament: They cannot..in ANY circumstan­ce...come out and say eating CERTAIN kinds of animals is OK....nor can they argue that healthy veganism is easily achievable by anyone other than the top...say.­..3-5% of the worlds population.”

TheLastPenguin replied on Oct 27, 2009 at 17:01:32

“Do a fact check - we could feed more of the world if we gave up meat. period.”

cucumber replied on Oct 27, 2009 at 16:00:36

“Most Europeans and Americans cannot afford to be vegan?

Epic fail. Try again, this time with facts.”

niko73 replied on Oct 27, 2009 at 15:21:57

“Good post. I think too many Americans forget about the rest of the world.

It's not a bad thing for everyone to move towards eating less meat. But most of the world has little choice.

As an American omnivore, I'll gladly take my licks. But I won't stand for attacks and hate towards all meat eaters.”
Jonathan Safran Foer's <i>Eating Animals</i> Turned Me Vegan

Jonathan Safran Foer's Eating Animals Turned Me Vegan

Commented Oct 27, 2009 at 14:07:35 in Books

“We are NOT herbivores, anatomically, anthropologically or any other way.

herbivores have ZERO stomach acid, we do (though not as much as true carnivores, thus indicating our 'omni-ness'). Our intestines are NOWHERE NEAR as long as true herbivores. EVERY mammalian herbivore has the ability to digest cellulose where we are TOTALLY incapable of doing so.

You can find select MDs to say/argue anything..­.just like you can find Creationist professors­/teachers.

Chew on this 9-part opus on the subject...­written by a vegan...th­en get back to me: http://www.beyondveg.com/billings-t/comp-anat/comp-anat-1a.shtml

SEQUOIABISON replied on Oct 27, 2009 at 17:34:15

“Lets not allow facts to get in the way of the truth.

Most vegetarians are aware of the website you offer, the author of those articles is definitely not a scientist nor a vegan but rather a spokesperson for the meat industry, the way Fox news distorts the facts for the republican party.

I would recommend reading real scientific studies instead of partisan opinions.
Dr Alan Walker anthropologist from John Hopkins University, Maryland, has done research that shows “early humans were once exclusive fruit eaters.”

He shows that humans are neither omnivore or herbivore but frugivore.

See article below;

Science Verifies That Humans Are Frugivores

http://www.scribd.com/doc/17111888/Science-Verifies-That-Humans-Are-Frugivores

Charles Darwin agreed:
"Although we know nothing for certain about the time or place that man shed the thick hair that covered him, with much probability of being right we could say that he must have lived in a warm country where conditions were favourable to the frugivorous way of life which, to judge from analogies, must have been the way man lived."

Thomas Henry Huxley (Darwins “bulldog”):

"The length of mans digestive tube is 5-8 meters and the distance between the mouth and the coccyx is 50 to 80 centimetres, which gives us a result of 10 as in other frugivorous animals and not 3 as in the carnivorous or 20 as in the herbivorous animals."”
Jonathan Safran Foer's <i>Eating Animals</i> Turned Me Vegan

Jonathan Safran Foer's Eating Animals Turned Me Vegan

Commented Oct 27, 2009 at 13:58:30 in Books

“Ummmm...I kinda capitalized "AND" in the phrase "100% designed to eat & digest meat AND plants" specifically so I'd be crystal-clear & un-parsed.

The link above is just the conclusion of a 9 part examination of this issue that's accessible on that page. Read the whole thing...an­d BTW, the author is vegan.”
Jonathan Safran Foer's <i>Eating Animals</i> Turned Me Vegan

Jonathan Safran Foer's Eating Animals Turned Me Vegan

Commented Oct 27, 2009 at 13:43:26 in Books

“I am in total agreement that we eat too MUCH red meat...tha­t factory farming is bad...that one has the capability to live healthily without meat (if one is careful).

I'm just sick of how hardcore vegans try to convince themselves & OTHERS that we are & have always been natural herbivores­...like that would somehow make their arguments more valid. They throw up all kinds of rehashed straw-man points like 'horses have canines' 'our stomach acids are week', 'our intestines are long'...wh­ile IGNORING the fact that herbivores have ZERO stomach acid..our intestines are NOWHERE NEAR as long as true herbivores, that EVERY herbivore has the ability to digest cellulose where we are TOTALLY incapable of doing so.

Stick with the VALID points about health & morality..­.you don't need to make stuff up, and like I say, that actually weakens the other points considerably.”

Ipanemagirl replied on Oct 29, 2009 at 18:42:14

“none of us here have said we are advocating anybody to become hard core vegans!
, we all just hate factory farms and decide we should eat less meat and demand better conditions for raising the meat we do eat. Whether to become vegetarian or vegan is a personal choice. I am ready to become vegetarian but i doubt very much I;ll ever become vegan because I cannot give up cheese, eggs and milk products. I still eat some meat but only once a week. or less, and in very tiny quantities. I find that I simply cannot eat meat as much as I did before My reasons initially were more against cruelty of animals than for health reasons.bu­t am also considering health factors now. one does evolve that way....”
next
1 - 25 of 253