racetoinfinity's Comments (588)
2009: The Year Wall Street Bounced Back and Main Street Got Shafted
Commented Dec 28, 2009 at 22:54:02 in Politics
“You're correct... and it's continuing full speed ahead with neoliberal Obama (Bill Clinton II).”
2009: The Year Wall Street Bounced Back and Main Street Got Shafted
Commented Dec 28, 2009 at 22:51:01 in Politics
“I'm going with both Wall St. and The Fed to blame. Are you separating their interest? Since Greenspan, and continuing with Bernanke (whose reconfirmation is a scandal), their interests have been identical.”
Getting Corporate Money Out of Politics Must Become Our #1 Priority
Commented Dec 28, 2009 at 18:07:32 in Politics
“Right-on post! We HAVE to insist on this, however it's done. Public financing of campaigns and strict lobbying rules are a good start. We are fast turning into a banana republic, and the buying of our government by the corporate plutocracy must be stopped!”
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac: Just a Four-Letter Word?
Commented Dec 28, 2009 at 17:43:15 in Business
“I don't see Obama as some sort of "victim" on his knees, but as a willing neoliberal co-corporatist. I don't know where you get this "victim" meme for him?”
Sunday Roundup
Commented Dec 27, 2009 at 16:10:35 in Politics
“He's not FAR better - he's better by a hair, which is not saying much.”
Christmas 2009: We Know Who's Been Naughty... Nice Is a Little Harder to Find
Commented Dec 24, 2009 at 03:51:55 in Comedy
“For Barack Obama: a plaque for his White House desk with the trusim: "Money talks, and b.s. walks!"”
The Senate Health Care Bill: Leave No Special Interest Behind
Commented Dec 24, 2009 at 03:45:55 in Politics
“You said it. The most important reformsm of all (if we EVER get them) will be public financing of campaigns and STRONG lobbying reform.”
Leadership, Obama Style, and the Looming Losses in 2010: Pretty Speeches, Compromised Values, and the Quest for the Lowest Common Denominator
Commented Dec 23, 2009 at 04:47:05 in Politics
“He ruined whatever progressive gains he had made in foreign policy with his Nobel war-mongering speech (and his escalation of the absurdly unwinnable (and damaging to this country on many levels) war in Afghanistan).
Obama is not a weak progressive; he is a faux-progressive. He put on the mask of a semi-progressive during the campaign, but -
In reality, he is a corporatist neoliberal, supporter of "free" markets and "free" trade, both of which have "successfully" fattened the corporate plutocracy's (the top 1%) bottom line while hollowing out (making poorer and more unemployed) the middle and working classes.”
Obama is not a weak progressive; he is a faux-progressive. He put on the mask of a semi-progressive during the campaign, but -
In reality, he is a corporatist neoliberal, supporter of "free" markets and "free" trade, both of which have "successfully" fattened the corporate plutocracy's (the top 1%) bottom line while hollowing out (making poorer and more unemployed) the middle and working classes.”
Finnian replied on Dec 23, 2009 at 09:29:44
“I would agree with everything you say, except the free markets and free trade comment.
Corporations generally tend to dislike free markets and free trade; unless these systems are somehow designed in their favor. Corporations like protected markets and restrictions on trade (for others). Markets required some order, meaning, rules, otherwise they wouldn't function. Free markets and free trade would be a positive step for our workforce in America. Eliminating anti-trust exemptions and instituting government run social services where markets fail (healthcare) would be complementary.
It is just an American ideology that somehow corporations require full discretion and that any form of societal control is an evil socialist/communist trap. We just need to decide whether we should allow corporations to exist (they are a legal fiction after all) for the benefit of society, or whether we are willing to accept that society lives for their benefit. Today, both sides of the American political spectrum (which ranges from the right to the far right) is at least implicitly convinced of the latter.”
Corporations generally tend to dislike free markets and free trade; unless these systems are somehow designed in their favor. Corporations like protected markets and restrictions on trade (for others). Markets required some order, meaning, rules, otherwise they wouldn't function. Free markets and free trade would be a positive step for our workforce in America. Eliminating anti-trust exemptions and instituting government run social services where markets fail (healthcare) would be complementary.
It is just an American ideology that somehow corporations require full discretion and that any form of societal control is an evil socialist/communist trap. We just need to decide whether we should allow corporations to exist (they are a legal fiction after all) for the benefit of society, or whether we are willing to accept that society lives for their benefit. Today, both sides of the American political spectrum (which ranges from the right to the far right) is at least implicitly convinced of the latter.”
jojothedoggirl replied on Dec 23, 2009 at 06:21:30
“We were put in this position by bush . Pakistan has nukes that have to be protected from falling into their hands. I hope we can get every troop out of there soon. I think Iraq was a huge ( I was going to say mistake , buy I think no mistake , done on purpose)”
For Obama, No Opportunity Too Big to Blow
Commented Dec 21, 2009 at 21:17:51 in Green
“President Obama has been a disappointing neoliberal sell-out on all major fronts.
The Green Party is looking better and better every day, if this is what the Democratic party has to offer.
I want to publicize a revolutionary idea that Fahreed Zakaria spotlighted on his GPS show on CNN last Sunday:
Nathan Myhrvold's revolutionary idea to solve global warming -
Watch -
http://www .cnn.com/v ideo/#/vid eo/podcast s/fareedza karia/site /2009/12/2 0/gps.podc ast.12.20. cnn
or read -
http://tra nscripts.c nn.com/TRA NSCRIPTS/0 912/20/fzg ps.01.html”
The Green Party is looking better and better every day, if this is what the Democratic party has to offer.
I want to publicize a revolutionary idea that Fahreed Zakaria spotlighted on his GPS show on CNN last Sunday:
Nathan Myhrvold's revolutionary idea to solve global warming -
Watch -
http://www
or read -
http://tra
More and More, Obama Seems a Faux Liberal
Commented Dec 20, 2009 at 22:26:47 in Politics
“How right you are. Obama is a full-fledged neoliberal - a lot of us got the disappointing message right after his election when he appointed Geithner and Summers to head his economic team.”
Left/Right Populist Outrage Will Defeat Senate Health Care Bill
Commented Dec 20, 2009 at 02:54:26 in Politics
“Sorry, but Clinton was a triangulating neoliberal (pro-"FREE"-market) with Robert Rubin on board as his Iago whispering "deregulate" in his ear for years.
If he'd vetoed it, it would have been an HONORABLE exit.
The American people gave him a high approval rating because we were in a bubble; they didn't foresee what the acts he signed in '99 and '00 would bring, which hell we (98% of us) are in at the moment.
Final point: Clinton himself now says he regrets signing the two bills
(The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 and The Commodities Futures Modernization Act of 2000).”
If he'd vetoed it, it would have been an HONORABLE exit.
The American people gave him a high approval rating because we were in a bubble; they didn't foresee what the acts he signed in '99 and '00 would bring, which hell we (98% of us) are in at the moment.
Final point: Clinton himself now says he regrets signing the two bills
(The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 and The Commodities Futures Modernization Act of 2000).”
Left/Right Populist Outrage Will Defeat Senate Health Care Bill
Commented Dec 19, 2009 at 02:33:26 in Politics
“But Bill had the horrendous sense to deregulate Wall St.”
Bloggerrogr replied on Dec 19, 2009 at 11:42:19
“Respectfully disagree on this point.
When presented to President Clinton, it was a fait accompli. Any veto he might have signed would have been overridden by a Congress controlled by Republicans. In the closing days of his presidency, Bill Clinton did not want to go out with that defeat ringing in the public's ears.
As a sidenote; Bill Clinton is the ONLY president in the last 50 years to leave office with higher approval numbers than on the day he was sworn in.
FWIW”
When presented to President Clinton, it was a fait accompli. Any veto he might have signed would have been overridden by a Congress controlled by Republicans. In the closing days of his presidency, Bill Clinton did not want to go out with that defeat ringing in the public's ears.
As a sidenote; Bill Clinton is the ONLY president in the last 50 years to leave office with higher approval numbers than on the day he was sworn in.
FWIW”
Left/Right Populist Outrage Will Defeat Senate Health Care Bill
Commented Dec 19, 2009 at 02:09:11 in Politics
“There are VERTICAL differences between levels as well as horizontal differences on levels - it's a matrix, not a flat spectrum.”
DrPaulProteus replied on Dec 23, 2009 at 20:10:36
“Well sure, but if you can at least get people thinking on two axes, it's more accurate than the one by far.
So there's left/right and authoritar ian/libert arian... what are some of the others? A 3D model would be great.”
So there's left/right and authoritar
Left/Right Populist Outrage Will Defeat Senate Health Care Bill
Commented Dec 19, 2009 at 02:04:07 in Politics
“The trick is to get the tea partiers to see that we have one party running the show the CORPORATE party, but I fear most of the populist rage on the right is wrong-headed. Here's what I wrote in response to Glenn Greenwald's column:
Perhaps the tea partiers are concerned about corporatism, but it seems to me they are largely unaware of it.
They don't seem to get the connection between government and what I call the plutocratic corporatocracy.
They are still being fed a bill of goods and believe, I think, that if they just get government "off their backs'; they can win the big lottery of business and become one of the ruling class.
I get your point that neoliberal (a la Clinton & Obama) government equates to corporate run government with some regulations and a bit more safety net, and conservative government equates to corporate run government without these, a small difference. But I don't see how you can get the tea partiers to wake up to the corporatism that is turning our country into a banana republic, when Dick Armey and Fox/Wall St. Republican operatives fill their not too bright heads with myths that it's an authoritarian government a la Stalin or Hitler that is their big, bad enemy, and that private corporations are their salvation. Maybe we can cull the more aware ones out who are outraged at the corporate takeover of our country."”
Perhaps the tea partiers are concerned about corporatism, but it seems to me they are largely unaware of it.
They don't seem to get the connection between government and what I call the plutocratic corporatocracy.
They are still being fed a bill of goods and believe, I think, that if they just get government "off their backs'; they can win the big lottery of business and become one of the ruling class.
I get your point that neoliberal (a la Clinton & Obama) government equates to corporate run government with some regulations and a bit more safety net, and conservative government equates to corporate run government without these, a small difference. But I don't see how you can get the tea partiers to wake up to the corporatism that is turning our country into a banana republic, when Dick Armey and Fox/Wall St. Republican operatives fill their not too bright heads with myths that it's an authoritarian government a la Stalin or Hitler that is their big, bad enemy, and that private corporations are their salvation. Maybe we can cull the more aware ones out who are outraged at the corporate takeover of our country."”
gwhitejr replied on Dec 19, 2009 at 02:48:40
“Thank You! This was very well stated. It is our duty as citizens to reclaim our country from corporate interests. The arguments typically associated with left/right seperation are for the most part unrelated to government. By driving wedges between people based on "moral" arguments (gay marriage, abortion) or monetary arguments(tax the wealthy, save the middle class) these corporate interests have gained more and more subsidies, legal protections and control.
While Americans are arguing with each other over flag burning, the religious implications of the pledge of allegience or whatever the current argument is, corporations pay the lowest tax rates overall, enjoy record profits or in the event they fail, huge cash bailouts. Obama's policies are 90% Bush's. The Constitution is eroded by the Patriot Act, the Drug war extracts a huge human and monetary toll, prisons are now for profit and CEO's get their million dollar bonuses as workers are laid off and the company looses money. The right says it is the fault of the liberals, the left blames the conservatives, meanwhile we are fighting 2 wars with no end and sight, and Haliburton has the contract.”
While Americans are arguing with each other over flag burning, the religious implications of the pledge of allegience or whatever the current argument is, corporations pay the lowest tax rates overall, enjoy record profits or in the event they fail, huge cash bailouts. Obama's policies are 90% Bush's. The Constitution is eroded by the Patriot Act, the Drug war extracts a huge human and monetary toll, prisons are now for profit and CEO's get their million dollar bonuses as workers are laid off and the company looses money. The right says it is the fault of the liberals, the left blames the conservatives, meanwhile we are fighting 2 wars with no end and sight, and Haliburton has the contract.”
Slouching Toward Health Care Reform
Commented Dec 18, 2009 at 22:38:32 in Politics
“Why hasn't Reid forced a reconciliation vote? I assume it's because he's bought and paid for by Big Corpa, too.
I'd like a list of the representatives in Congress who aren't bought and paid for by Big Business. I think there are about 80 in the House and maybe 4 in the Senate ??”
I'd like a list of the representatives in Congress who aren't bought and paid for by Big Business. I think there are about 80 in the House and maybe 4 in the Senate ??”
"Great Man" Theory? History Is Driven by the Little Guy
Commented Dec 12, 2009 at 16:51:35 in Entertainment
“Right - constant poplular use legitates previously incorrect usage. Right now, everyone says "lay down" for the instranstive "lie down."
I wonder if the dictionary assigns an intransitive type to "to lie" as well as a transitive type now.”
I wonder if the dictionary assigns an intransitive type to "to lie" as well as a transitive type now.”
"Great Man" Theory? History Is Driven by the Little Guy
Commented Dec 12, 2009 at 16:41:31 in Entertainment
“No comment - there IS what is in front of us, no interpretation needed.”
DixieMay replied on Dec 13, 2009 at 02:26:25
“Well I see a vast array of things in front of me. Many views and many interpetat ions...”
"Great Man" Theory? History Is Driven by the Little Guy
Commented Dec 12, 2009 at 05:30:16 in Entertainment
“You said it, Viggo. And we need to stop our Obama-philia and struggle, including progressive protests, against the neoliberal agenda he is presiding over.”
DixieMay replied on Dec 12, 2009 at 12:18:07
“That's what you got from this? Weird...I got the nearly the opposite. LOL...we all see what we want don't we?”
The Demoralized Democratic Base
Commented Dec 10, 2009 at 02:06:35 in Politics
“And you forgot one of the biggest let-downs, anti-progressive economic in-bed-with-Wall St. appointments Goldman Sachs' Geithner & Summers, Obama revealed as a sell-out member of the corporate plutocracy doing their bidding or close to it.”
Why Politics-As-Usual May Mean the End of Civilization
Commented Dec 07, 2009 at 15:55:16 in Green
“The most important (and sadly, depressing) post of the year. Thank you Bill McKibben - you are a true hero with integrity telling it like it is!”
A Tale of Two Obamas
Commented Dec 07, 2009 at 15:48:23 in Politics
“I'm talking about his political philosophy - free market, free trade - corporatist - neoliberal - he doesn't have to literally be a member of the DLC to share their "values."”
A Tale of Two Obamas
Commented Dec 07, 2009 at 14:03:01 in Politics
“Is this high school?”
Username 1 replied on Dec 08, 2009 at 05:13:17
“Please elaborate,”
A Tale of Two Obamas
Commented Dec 07, 2009 at 13:58:05 in Politics
“More evidence of the REAL reason we are in Afghanistan - oil and natural gas hegemony.”
A Tale of Two Obamas
Commented Dec 07, 2009 at 06:18:33 in Politics
“correction - I meant to write that Bill Clinton is was a DLC neolib.”
TN60 replied on Dec 07, 2009 at 11:51:45
“We know what you meant and I don't think Obama ever was a part of the DLC. That was Hillary supporters.”
Ergon replied on Dec 07, 2009 at 07:23:36
“I realised I was confusing DLC with DNC too.”


