iOS app Android app
Clicking Follow Back will add user to your friends list and may allow access to your Social News timeline..

HuffPost Social News

Badges:
Your Badges and the Badge Module will be removed from your profile

rescue101's Comments

View Comments:   Sort:
next
1 - 25
'Alone Yet Not Alone' Oscar Nomination Rescinded

'Alone Yet Not Alone' Oscar Nomination Rescinded

Commented Jun 13, 2014 at 01:39:08 in Entertainment

“If there were any doubt about the Left's war on religion, the hateful comments below dispel it.”
'Alone Yet Not Alone' Oscar Nomination Rescinded

'Alone Yet Not Alone' Oscar Nomination Rescinded

Commented Jun 13, 2014 at 01:37:41 in Entertainment

“find it interesting (but not surprising) that a person who advertises to the world that his favorite game is strip poker would go after Christians.

By the way, there is an "r" in "favorite".”
Republicans Aren't Moving On From Obamacare

Republicans Aren't Moving On From Obamacare

Commented Apr 20, 2014 at 07:08:12 in Politics

“Spoken like a true "peacekitten" LOL!”

peacekitten on Apr 20, 2014 at 19:41:25

“it becomes obvious that my attackers have nothing when they start making fun of my moniker.    your post was false on all counts.”
Republicans Aren't Moving On From Obamacare

Republicans Aren't Moving On From Obamacare

Commented Apr 19, 2014 at 06:23:05 in Politics

“I'm not sure which I object to more -- the false statements in your post, or the fact that you are paid by the taxpayers to make them.”

peacekitten on Apr 19, 2014 at 17:06:09

“off your meds again, i see.”

58 Squarebird on Apr 19, 2014 at 07:58:26

“PeaceKitten isn't a PPP, unlike you. And please .. Show us in your infinite wisdom, exactly what she said that's wrong.”
The Only Form Of Corruption The Supreme Court Cares About Is Almost Impossible To Prosecute

The Only Form Of Corruption The Supreme Court Cares About Is Almost Impossible To Prosecute

Commented Apr 13, 2014 at 15:28:18 in Politics

“I don't see the left wing going after Union-paid political advertisements -- something that dwarfs what the Koch brothers do.

Seems that what constitutes a "bribe" in your mind depends entirely on who's doing the bribing.”
Major League Baseball No More Black Than It Was In The 1950s

Major League Baseball No More Black Than It Was In The 1950s

Commented Apr 10, 2014 at 12:07:07 in Sports

“The closest we have to a woman playing against a man, is Obama vs Putin.”
Major League Baseball No More Black Than It Was In The 1950s

Major League Baseball No More Black Than It Was In The 1950s

Commented Apr 10, 2014 at 10:25:58 in Sports

“And the percentage of women players is still the same too.

So there you have it. Conclusive evidence that MLB is racist and sexist.”

jwoww on Apr 10, 2014 at 12:25:15

“YOU NAILED IT!!!”

Brandon Sullivan on Apr 10, 2014 at 10:32:36

“And hockey. Obama are you listening! There must be women allowed to play with men in sports! PASS A BILL NOW!”
The Only Form Of Corruption The Supreme Court Cares About Is Almost Impossible To Prosecute

The Only Form Of Corruption The Supreme Court Cares About Is Almost Impossible To Prosecute

Commented Apr 8, 2014 at 19:52:04 in Politics

“Nice. More vulgarity from the "intellectual" party.”

ForrestGrump on Apr 8, 2014 at 21:07:57

“Okely Dokely Mr. Flanders.”
The Only Form Of Corruption The Supreme Court Cares About Is Almost Impossible To Prosecute

The Only Form Of Corruption The Supreme Court Cares About Is Almost Impossible To Prosecute

Commented Apr 7, 2014 at 21:12:12 in Politics

“You have no answer to the question other than to name-call me for asking it.

The question is, once you say that Entity A cannot use it's money to promote its political position, then how can you say that Entity B can?

To say that one is a "newspaper" and the other is not, is pretty lame. In today's world, what's a "newspaper"? Is Yahoo? Is my on-line blog? Is HP? Is Slate?”
The Only Form Of Corruption The Supreme Court Cares About Is Almost Impossible To Prosecute

The Only Form Of Corruption The Supreme Court Cares About Is Almost Impossible To Prosecute

Commented Apr 7, 2014 at 16:00:17 in Politics

“Do newspapers get First Amendment protections that individuals don't?

If so, why?

And if so, where do you draw the line? What if I buy Google or Yahoo? Or a movie studio?”

DenverRight on Apr 7, 2014 at 18:24:53

“or NBC (General Electric) or Fox News (Murdoch)?”

PeaRidge on Apr 7, 2014 at 16:05:23

“You're getting even more ridiculous. Let me tell you something. You are not going to be any happier with this decision than the left is. The left wing has a lot of filthy rich friends too.”
The Only Form Of Corruption The Supreme Court Cares About Is Almost Impossible To Prosecute

The Only Form Of Corruption The Supreme Court Cares About Is Almost Impossible To Prosecute

Commented Apr 7, 2014 at 15:42:39 in Politics

“You're mistaken. Their lifetimes appointments are provided in the U.S. Constitution.”

dennidus1680 on Apr 12, 2014 at 13:01:31

“I know. It's the only thing in the Constitution I think need revising. The Supreme Court already thinks the Constitution is what they say it is and when you get ideologues in there should be some way of getting rid of them when they cause too much harm. The right wing of the current incumbents have legalized bribery out on the open based on the lie that campaign contributions in large amounts are not bribes.”

ForrestGrump on Apr 8, 2014 at 16:21:20

“The US Constitution isn't worth wiping my b um with.”
The Only Form Of Corruption The Supreme Court Cares About Is Almost Impossible To Prosecute

The Only Form Of Corruption The Supreme Court Cares About Is Almost Impossible To Prosecute

Commented Apr 7, 2014 at 15:41:55 in Politics

“I assume you apply that same analysis to money given by the United Auto Workers, Planned Parenthood and the Sierra Club.

Or do you?”
The Only Form Of Corruption The Supreme Court Cares About Is Almost Impossible To Prosecute

The Only Form Of Corruption The Supreme Court Cares About Is Almost Impossible To Prosecute

Commented Apr 7, 2014 at 15:40:35 in Politics

“If it's OK to prohibit individuals like the Kochs from spending money to promote their political position, then wouldn't it also be OK to prohibit a corporation like the New York Times from doing the same?

Why's one OK, and the other not? Is it just because the Koch's are conservative and the NYT is liberal?”

Patricia Hutchins Lyon on Apr 7, 2014 at 15:56:12

“Absolutely! I am not sure why one believes that the more money one has that it would entitle them to greater access to any of our democratic institutions, whether or not their politics is conservative or liberal.”

PeaRidge on Apr 7, 2014 at 15:49:30

“Nobody cares if the Kochs buy a newspaper (if they don't already own one) and print all the propaganda they want. Your analogy is ridiculously false.”
Supreme Court Weighing Obamacare Birth Control Coverage

Supreme Court Weighing Obamacare Birth Control Coverage

Commented Apr 6, 2014 at 19:59:12 in Politics

“Oh, I see you'd like to change the subject with your "Btw..."

Nice try.”

book on Apr 7, 2014 at 11:39:40

“I'm not trying to change the subject at all. I was just offering up new information that has come to light which makes the Hobby Lobby suit even more outrageous.

The bottom line on your criminality complaint remains the same. The health insurance requirements are a legitimate part of employment law and those who refuse to comply need to face the same consequences that I would if I refused to comply with employment law.

Of course, single payer health care would eliminate this issue altogether. It's too bad that the GOP prefers to let middle class people lose everything when they get sick instead of creating a simple, affordable healthcare system which would result in a healthier populace at a significantly lower cost than our current system.”
Supreme Court Weighing Obamacare Birth Control Coverage

Supreme Court Weighing Obamacare Birth Control Coverage

Commented Apr 5, 2014 at 19:59:25 in Politics

“Well, thanks for the education.

So the penalties for failing to comply with their law are merely (1) they sue you, (2) they win a judgment for money, and (3) they seize your property.

Considered that way, I suppose the mandates of Obamacare are not so bad...... LOL”

book on Apr 6, 2014 at 03:51:49

“Your claim was that it was criminal which it is not.

Btw, the pills that Hobby Lobby object to are not abortifacients and were actually covered in their insurance before they decided to get their name in the papers. Oh, and the Greens invest in the corporation that makes one or more of those pills.

The hypocrisy, yours and theirs, is staggering.”
Sen. John Barrasso: White House Is 'Cooking The Books' On Obamacare Enrollment Numbers

Sen. John Barrasso: White House Is 'Cooking The Books' On Obamacare Enrollment Numbers

Commented Mar 30, 2014 at 13:52:24 in Politics

“Surely he's not suggesting that the WH would mislead people.....”

Sunset Siren on Mar 30, 2014 at 13:56:53

“Sadly he "thinks" everyone is like HIM! Where's the "proof" to back up HIS accusations? Did you see it?
Or is HE trying to mislead people?”

BigLeftbowski on Mar 30, 2014 at 13:55:00

“Surely he's not suggesting that republicans actually care if anyone who can't afford healthcare insurance actually gets any.”
Supreme Court Weighing Obamacare Birth Control Coverage

Supreme Court Weighing Obamacare Birth Control Coverage

Commented Mar 29, 2014 at 21:04:35 in Politics

“What if you don't?”

book on Apr 5, 2014 at 03:10:13

“They seize your property.”
When Two Wonks Go to War (Go to War, Go to War)

When Two Wonks Go to War (Go to War, Go to War)

Commented Mar 26, 2014 at 23:49:20 in Media

“Does Paul Krugman have a friend? Even one?”
Divided Federal Appeals Judges Debate Obamacare

Divided Federal Appeals Judges Debate Obamacare

Commented Mar 26, 2014 at 16:30:44 in Politics

“Re-read the language of your comment, and then tell me with a straight face that you fit your tagline of "peacekitten".”
Divided Federal Appeals Judges Debate Obamacare

Divided Federal Appeals Judges Debate Obamacare

Commented Mar 26, 2014 at 11:01:24 in Politics

“Maybe the Dems should read their legislation before passing it. Is that too much to ask?”
Divided Federal Appeals Judges Debate Obamacare

Divided Federal Appeals Judges Debate Obamacare

Commented Mar 26, 2014 at 11:00:10 in Politics

“This particular issue was not before the Supreme court. But it will be.”

peacekitten on Mar 26, 2014 at 11:20:24

“what the court was asked to rule on was the foundation of the law.   without it, the law would have been struck down, and this would be a moot point. but the right wing is so rabid and out of control, that they will grasp at any kind of straw to try and hurt people, from trying to claim that corporations can have religious convictions that they have the right to force on other people, to trying to parse the meaning of the word "state" to death. they know that now this law has taken hold, it's going to be impossible to repeal it and still get elected to office, so they're trying any desperate tactic they can think of     the spectacle they are making of themselves is appalling, but not half as appalling as knowing that they have supporters who encourage them.    that's just shameful, especially for anyone with a single functioning synapse.”
Divided Federal Appeals Judges Debate Obamacare

Divided Federal Appeals Judges Debate Obamacare

Commented Mar 26, 2014 at 10:58:59 in Politics

“Here's an instance where they really, really should have read it before they passed it.

It says "a STATE exchange." A Federal exchange is not a state exchange. The administration now wants the court to re-write it in the way they wish they had written it to begin with.

I'll say it again -- they should have read it themselves before they passed it.”
Supreme Court Weighing Obamacare Birth Control Coverage

Supreme Court Weighing Obamacare Birth Control Coverage

Commented Mar 25, 2014 at 18:51:38 in Politics

“You reference "the religious rights of people" who disagree with HL's religion.

Are you under the impression that the employees of HL have a "religious right" to (1) birth control and (2) payment for said birth control by their employer?

I don't think they are asserting any such religious right. Am I mistaken?”
Supreme Court Weighing Obamacare Birth Control Coverage

Supreme Court Weighing Obamacare Birth Control Coverage

Commented Mar 25, 2014 at 18:48:56 in Politics

“Oh, is that all? What happens after they win?”

book on Mar 29, 2014 at 14:07:01

“You pay them.”
Supreme Court Struggles In Hobby Lobby Case With Question Of Companies' Religious Rights

Supreme Court Struggles In Hobby Lobby Case With Question Of Companies' Religious Rights

Commented Mar 25, 2014 at 16:12:35 in Politics

“Judging by the escalating shrillness and sensationalism, the quantity of clicks here is something less than what they promised their advertisers.”
next
1 - 25