HuffPost Social News

rimofheaven's Comments (24)

View Comments:   Sort:
<i>Eating Animals</i>: Jonathan Safran Foer's New Book Asks Why Don't We Eat Pets?

Eating Animals: Jonathan Safran Foer's New Book Asks Why Don't We Eat Pets?

Commented Oct 30, 2009 at 11:27:47 in Books

“Just the excerpts from this book are profound. An actual full read probably would change you forever. The problem with eating meat is that there is zero moderation. No Temperance whatsoever. Mass production for profit. The whole question kind of fills you with a feeling of knowing dread. Maybe we are the problem. Maybe the earth would be better off without us: Industrialized civilizations.”

marianproletarian replied on Oct 30, 2009 at 13:31:48

“Maybe? I think we all know the earth would be better off without us.”

LCRover001 replied on Oct 30, 2009 at 12:44:43

“This book as valid points but it is also written from a biased point of view.

Why were all the environmental problems that have and are still being cause by commercialized framing of crops left out? Why is it that these types only focuses on one side and refuse to admit that the commercial growing of crops also cause great harm to our planet.

Do not wish an end to mankind because of the biased outlook of another’s point of view or their research into one side of the problem.

I love the chicken example in those 80 years has the population not drastically increased?

As for ending the life of an animal for food just because they are almost basically the same as us, how is the ending of one life any different than the ending of another. How is the ending of a plants life any different, they have feelings blablabla, there is no basic difference a life ends plant or animal alike for one to continue on another must not.

The reason those and the writer see a difference is because we are almost basically the same, however in the end something’s life must end be it plant or animal, and regardless of how that life is raised up harm is done to our planet.”
huffingtonpost entry

A New Wrinkle in the JFK Assassination Story

Commented Oct 30, 2009 at 11:08:58 in Books

“Interesting, but who and what was President Johnson referring to? I guess the old saying is true: "A lie will run around the world while the truth is still getting it's boots on."”
HuffPost's Editor Roy Sekoff Discusses Liz Cheney's New Group On The Ed Show (VIDEO)

HuffPost's Editor Roy Sekoff Discusses Liz Cheney's New Group On The Ed Show (VIDEO)

Commented Oct 26, 2009 at 15:52:11 in Politics

“Yeah, she's scary. Still, what's scarier is that she and others like her - Beck, Rush, etc - has platform surrounded by eager listeners.”
huffingtonpost entry

Palin Attended Church Event With Samurai Sword Ceremony

Commented Jul 18, 2009 at 01:13:11 in Politics

“Define cult. Then define legitimate Christian organization.”
huffingtonpost entry

Palin Attended Church Event With Samurai Sword Ceremony

Commented Jul 17, 2009 at 18:58:06 in Politics

“So?
Is this about Palin or Christians? It's okay for athletic coaches, motivational speakers, and CEO's to use strong illustrations when making their point, but it is strange when Christians do it? Whatever.”

JohnSawyer replied on Jul 17, 2009 at 19:02:45

“You're not looking at the overall picture, nor many of the other, even more alarming statements in the article. It's not about Christians, but about a cult that calls itself Christian.”
Steele: I'll Woo Blacks To GOP With

Steele: I'll Woo Blacks To GOP With "Fried Chicken And Potato Salad"

Commented Jul 14, 2009 at 15:23:26 in Politics

“Whatever...

Mr. Steele clearly doesn't get it when it comes to the demise of his dinosaur of a party, however, this little clip is itself an insulting form of race bating and sensationalism. As a black person who happens to be an American, am I supposed to be appalled by this? This man displayed his ignorance, but the media insults us and reveals some of the dinosaurs hiding in it's closet when it attempts to play on the very assumptions it itself is making in regards to my people.”
The Real Reason for Michael Jackson's Death? His Secret Fatal Illness

The Real Reason for Michael Jackson's Death? His Secret Fatal Illness

Commented Jun 29, 2009 at 15:41:04 in Entertainment

“Who knows? Its sad. We have for years ridiculed him for being an oddity in many ways: from his skin pigment to his facial surgery. What I keep remembering though is that little boy on center stage charming the world. He had so much fame so soon. The world loved him, but Michael learned not to love himself. Why? When you shine that bright everyone wants a piece of you, sometimes literally. Michael was a victim of abuse himself, and he survived it in his own way. Still, stars and celebrities do not the best counsel make. They will never tell you what you need to hear, only what best serves his or her purpose. Micheal's oddities were seen as mysterious eccentricities, rather than signs that someone might need some real help. What he needed was a real friend or two. The day before he died my wife and I out of the blue began telling our daughters (ages 9 & 11) who Micheal Jackson was because they did not know. We showed them who he was in the beginning and who he became. Then we played a few songs for them. They were impressed, yet curious in a cautious sort of way. Even to them he was mysterious in a sad sort of way. The word "why" escaped their lips a few times. It probably the same for all of us.”
FOX Ambushes Bill Moyers; Journalists Ambush FOX

FOX Ambushes Bill Moyers; Journalists Ambush FOX

Commented Jun 09, 2008 at 18:10:09 in Home

“I've never witnessed a senior spank a greenhorn so thoroughly, yet so graciously, in my entire life. It was grace, dignity, and wisdom, vs brute force, malevolence, and folly.”

davkaman replied on Jun 09, 2008 at 18:54:37

“Nicely put! And may we see more of it.

Question: in what venues or programs, other than his own, has O'Reilly appeared? I honestly don't know. Has there been many? A few? Any?

This much is clear: to paraphrase an old turn of frase, the relation of O'Reilly devotees to his reportage is rather like that of a drunkard to a lamp post: used for support rather than illumination.”

"Uncle Barack's Cabin": Why We Must Repudiate the Ugly Racial Undercurrents of the Campaign

Commented Jun 08, 2008 at 16:20:05 in Politics

“Powerfully stated.
As racially charged as this campaign has been, it's quite possible that we haven't seen anything yet.”
Even In Defeat, It's All About Her

Even In Defeat, It's All About Her

Commented Jun 05, 2008 at 15:05:56 in Politics

“23 - NUMBER OF TIMES OBAMA SAID "I", "I'LL", "I'M" OR "I'VE" DURING HIS VICTORY SPEECH IN ST. PAUL.”

clevelandchick replied on Jun 05, 2008 at 18:04:31

“65 - THE NUMBER OF TIMES HILLARY SAID I OR I'VE IN HER SPEECH IN SOUTH DAKOTA.”

Jazzbeau replied on Jun 05, 2008 at 17:11:30

“So?...

(In the immortal words of Dick 'five deferments' Cheney)”

MPeter replied on Jun 05, 2008 at 16:19:41

“Yep, it was always about her. She has no clue as to what the word TEAM means. It is about I, I, I, and I. Here, take a listen, courtesy of Daily Kos and Jon Stewart:
http://dailykos.comhttp://dailykos.com/”

rigveda replied on Jun 05, 2008 at 16:18:21

“Are you suggesting he's a member of the Illuminati?”
Even In Defeat, It's All About Her

Even In Defeat, It's All About Her

Commented Jun 05, 2008 at 14:57:53 in Politics

“62 - THE NUMBER OF TIMES HILLARY SAID "I", "I'M", OR "I'LL" DURING HER NON-CONCESSION CONCESSION SPEECH IN NEW YORK.

Pretty eerie.”

writeaway replied on Jun 05, 2008 at 16:31:50

“Who the heck is counting? Get a life.”
Even In Defeat, It's All About Her

Even In Defeat, It's All About Her

Commented Jun 05, 2008 at 14:04:46 in Politics

“She could write a book about her own campaign, and call it "The Audacity of the Lust For Power." I have never in all of my life witnessed such supreme, reckless, selfishness. And her family is standing beside her, condoning in both word and in silence, her behavior. We the voters, are truly the only ones who can hold her responsible.”

BubbaC33 replied on Jun 05, 2008 at 23:56:19

“You and responsible in the same sentence is something I bet hasn't happened very often.”
Hillary as Veep a Bad Move for Women

Hillary as Veep a Bad Move for Women

Commented Jun 04, 2008 at 15:41:47 in Politics

“I agree. But, it didn't have to be this way. The party would be so much stronger right now, if she had dropped the crusade act, and focused on strengthening the democrats chances this fall. Now, their is so much resentment, I'm afraid. Many women seem so bitter about this, and they are blaming Obama for Hillary's defeat. How rational or fair is that? How do you feel about Barack. I would love to read your thoughts. I'm a black American male, so I know there is much I don't understand”

groucho replied on Jun 05, 2008 at 01:54:45

“troll alert”

EinChicago replied on Jun 04, 2008 at 17:59:50

“"I'm a black American male, so I know there is much I don't understand"

Close your eyes and imagine Clinton won even though Obama had more popular votes. Feel that anger? That;'s teh deep seated anger 18 million HRC supporters feel. Would you have "got over it" in a few months?”
Hillary as Veep a Bad Move for Women

Hillary as Veep a Bad Move for Women

Commented Jun 04, 2008 at 14:33:26 in Politics

“"As Hillary Clinton gave her non-concession speech in Manhattan last night, it was hard not to feel for her. For Clinton, it's not simply the loss of the nomination that must smart, but also the role her husband played in wrecking her chances of success."

PLEASE! Why can't women hold each other accountable? Hillary lost this race. If anyone can actually have the nerve to suggest that Hillary was not calling the shots in her own campaign, then all you are really saying is that senator Clinton can't run a campaign or make her own decisions, much less be president.

By blaming everyone but Hillary, or minimizing her mistakes, you do all women a disservice by portraying them as vitcims. Hillary is no victim. Senator Clinton, her family, friends, and supporters, should be grateful that the media chose not to dig up the past unless Hillary dug it up first (Bosnia, Martin Luther King, Bobby Kennedy).”
McAuliffe: Obama Has A Hispanic Problem

McAuliffe: Obama Has A Hispanic Problem

Commented Jun 02, 2008 at 13:21:53 in Politics

“I'm sorry, but, Latinos seem to have a Obama problem. I fail to see how Latinos are any different then the voters in West Virginia, or Kentucky. My best friend is from Mexico. We talk for hours at a time about this issue. She concedes that many Latinos, like many whites, have a problem with a black candidate.

Remember Texan Hispanic community leader Adelfa Callejo's, 84, said that Barack Obama would have trouble gaining Latino support because Black politicians have done little for Hispanics and Obama "simply has a problem that he happens to be Black" ?”
Scotty Come Lately

Scotty Come Lately

Commented May 29, 2008 at 16:44:57 in Politics

“Arianna, I have to disagree with you about the timing. Scott's is not too late; he is right on time. Had he attempted to come forward with this information earlier, we would have doubted it because our stomachs weren't full of war yet. Also, how short is your memory in regards to the fever pitch of patriotism that this entire country was experiencing during the earlier stages of the war/occupation in Iraq? I was living in Rochester, NH. at the time, and I can tell you between all of the American flags, bumper stickers, buring candles on lawns, you did not dare to speak against the "War on Terror" in regards to Iraq for fear of fierce lashings from co-workers, friends, family, and perfect strangers. Can you imagine what type of pressure someone in Scott's position would be under to be the good, red white and blue American, in the Bush administration? When was the last time you had to consider facing Dick Cheney before you made a policy decision? I debated with good christian Americans, who have loved ones in Iraq, who fiercely defended the war, and belittled anyone who used to support it but grew disenchanted with it. Scott could not have timed his "coming out party" more perfectly because for the first time in a long time we are ready to listen.”

jmrozendaal replied on May 29, 2008 at 23:43:39

“It is never to early to speak the truth.”
The World I Knew: Why It's Time for Hillary Clinton To Go

The World I Knew: Why It's Time for Hillary Clinton To Go

Commented May 25, 2008 at 22:11:53 in Politics

“Good point. Nostalgia has caused many of us to forget what the Clintons once stood for: Hope, Change, and a new brand of politics influenced by the youth. They no longer stand for these noble ideals. They are established, Washington, elitist, who will do, say, and deny anything to increase their political collateral.”
Fear of Islam Hurts Obama in Kentucky

Fear of Islam Hurts Obama in Kentucky

Commented May 23, 2008 at 22:45:22 in Politics

“Bull. "Fear of Islam" is just an excuse.”
Stop Yelling at Hillary to Stand Down and Start Yelling at the Superdelegates to Stand Up

Stop Yelling at Hillary to Stand Down and Start Yelling at the Superdelegates to Stand Up

Commented May 23, 2008 at 19:58:26 in Politics

“No Arianna. Hillary has never held herself accountable, partly because we never demand that she do so, so the voters should shout at her. Everyone with a voice (You) should be shouting at her to stop with the "All or nothing by any means or words necessary" routine.”
Fear of Islam Hurts Obama in Kentucky

Fear of Islam Hurts Obama in Kentucky

Commented May 23, 2008 at 19:50:54 in Politics

“What everrrr. The "Fear of Islam" is just an excuse. Plain and simple.”
What Game is Hillary Playing?

What Game is Hillary Playing?

Commented May 22, 2008 at 22:25:45 in Politics

“Too the Clintons, this should never have happened. It's all a mistake. We didn't hear her the first time: She is supposed to be the nominee. She is simply playing the waiting game. In enough time, perhaps we will all see the error of our ways, and realize that an Obama presidency really is a fairy tale.”
Hillary Clinton's Defeat: A Historic Triumph

Hillary Clinton's Defeat: A Historic Triumph

Commented May 19, 2008 at 19:07:36 in Politics

“She fights on for four reasons: 1 - Her tactics did not leave a path of return that would allow her to bow out and save face at the same time. 2 - She has an image to repair. 3 - There is still hope that Obama could self-destruct. 4- Pride, which everyone knoweth, goes before a fall.”

ThadeusCrumb replied on May 19, 2008 at 19:49:46

“Don't forget the money. If she drops out, legal barriers go up and she has trouble repaying the millions she's lent the campaign.

Guess Bill will have to do another deal with Arab dictators to make up the difference. Maybe two.

As for repairing her image, if she keeps going at this rate, showing the world she considers the Democratic Party her personal tool to achieve absolute power, she'll get Liebermaned right out of the party. If that was her aim, she'd be behaving quite a bit differently, I think.”

Tankmaster replied on May 19, 2008 at 19:27:49

“As a life-long democrat I began this primary season with full support to Hillary Clinton. Many of us did not even know who Obama was. However, as the season progressed she became much more negative and ready to personally attack Obama, but he stuck to his message of hope and change and rarely, if ever, attacked her.

You can blame whoever you want ( Mark Penn for example ) but ultimately SHE is responsible for her own situation. Had she remained loyal to her pricipals instead of pandering when she was behind she may have now been the nominee. There is a lesson here, but not exactly what Huffington describes.”
Why John Edwards Endorsed Obama Today

Why John Edwards Endorsed Obama Today

Commented May 15, 2008 at 03:52:25 in Home

“Amen.”
On My Switch From Clinton to Obama

On My Switch From Clinton to Obama

Commented May 01, 2008 at 17:01:06 in Politics

“Mr. Andrew,

Thank you for your courages choice. All of us are so tired. The cynicism, negativity, spin, and media agenda, have driven us to to succumb and participate in the madness. Your difficult choice has gone a long way in restoring my faith in America and her leaders. I hope, and pray, that your brave, and discerning statement will inspire Indiana voters as well.

Sincerely,

Peter Harris”

inditer replied on May 01, 2008 at 17:44:47

“Mr Andrew. Yours is a wonderfully compelling gesture. It will help put the democratic process back on track. I hope you plan on assuming a higher profile post-November 4th. This party started losing moral traction under Terry McAuliffe and continued through the participation in the Clinton campaign of McAuliffe, Williams and Penn. Hillary's self-absorbed, gutter politics were extremely counter-productive as well.

If Howard Dean had provided stronger and more concise leadership weeks ago, I doubt your pronouncements would have been necessary. He let Clinton, the divider, get way out of hand and even today, other than a few tepid warnings to get things settled before the convention, seems in over his head.

Again, kudos for your courageous stand. You should be OK. I think the magic of the Clinton name has been tarnished - perhaps beyond repair.”