HuffPost Social News

sailhardy's Comments (7)

View Comments:   Sort:
ClimateGate: The 7 Biggest Lies About The Supposed

ClimateGate: The 7 Biggest Lies About The Supposed "Global Warming Hoax"

Commented Dec 02, 2009 at 15:52:16 in Green

“Are all the little spinmeisters heard from? The fact is that scientists are no better than the lemmings of the Progressives, rushing to a consensus on global warming. Science is, of course, all about consensus. Just ask Galileo.”

soisay replied on Dec 02, 2009 at 23:04:04

“Galileo was not excommunicated and placed under house arrest by a scientific society. Pope JP2 withdrew it, not any professional group. When Rushdie wrote his book, it wasn't literature societies that forced him into hiding. When Socrates drank hemlock, the consensus of citizens was similar to that of teabaggers (tyranny of the majority). Scientific communities are the best place to have arguments (big bang, string theory, ether, heliocentric) as the truth always wins out in the end. As for climate change, here is hoping the scientific community can rise above the political screamers in time.”
AARP To Endorse House Health Care Bill: AP

AARP To Endorse House Health Care Bill: AP

Commented Nov 05, 2009 at 11:00:14 in Politics

“Since the AARP sold out to pharmaceutical firms on Medicare Part D, the organisation has zero credibility on health issues.”

Plain English replied on Nov 06, 2009 at 00:11:43

“Check out the American Senior Benefits Association (ASBA). They are opposed to the Health Reform Bill because they acknowledge that their own members are opposed to it. Some senior organizations want seniors to follow in the direction the organization leads. ASBA lets members take the lead and supports them by providing free membership, discounts on benefits, and keeping up to speed on what’s going on in Washington. Visit their website at www.asbaonline.org
Gibbs: Karzai Is The

Gibbs: Karzai Is The "Legitimate Leader"

Commented Nov 02, 2009 at 17:32:03 in Politics

“Perhaps we can send John Kerry there again. Maybe the Afghans will keep him this time. We have to look at this with optimism and hope.”
Why Journalists Shouldn't Be Defending Fox News

Why Journalists Shouldn't Be Defending Fox News

Commented Oct 23, 2009 at 16:09:44 in Politics

“In the interests of fairness, the Obama Administration should suspend the First Amendment for the duration of Mr. Obama's presidency. He should certainly use the full power of the U.S. government to harass and intimidate all Fox News personnel, even the janitors. The full panoply of early a.m. enhanced interrogations by the FBI; IRS audits; and forced listening to the sermons and diatribes of Obama's favourite pastor, Rev. Wright, and audio tapes of the collected writings and bombings of Bill Ayers, with a few rants from Van Jones should be thrown in for good measure.”

mancoff replied on Oct 23, 2009 at 17:36:38

“What you commend Fox for bringing to our attention was covered closely by other news media in a factual manner with honest reporting. Only Fox kept up the drama and propoganda by adding their innuendo's, suppositions not backed up by facts and enhanced the relationship between Ayers and Obama which they could never prove. They could only find negatives on Obama when they used the "guilt by association" gambit. Fox could find nothing and they tried for months and months andmonths in Obama's actions, words, or deeds when they were trying to link him to others. That's the whole point here. Fox creates and embellishes news where they choose to and ignores news when they want to depending on their agenda. They completely ignored Sarah Palin's close association with the secessionists in Alaska who advocate seceding from the Union. They didn't even mention it. Didn't fit in to their agenda and those who only listen to Fox never heard a thing about it?”

Knowbetter replied on Oct 23, 2009 at 16:29:52

“You should take a long walk on short pier.”
Schumer: Opt-Out Public Option Being

Schumer: Opt-Out Public Option Being "Very Seriously Considered"

Commented Oct 11, 2009 at 16:01:34 in Politics

“Since Chuck Schumer is one of the most partisan people in Congress, and is one of the more seriously compromised by the contributions he solicits from the finance industry, it is always wise to check his contributors before paying attention to anything he says. He is one of the reasons that the Democratic Party is seen as possibly even more corrupt than Republicans when they were in the majority. His performance leading to the AIG meltdown was disgraceful.”
Schumer: Senate Dems Will

Schumer: Senate Dems Will "Come Together On A Public Option"

Commented Oct 04, 2009 at 12:41:14 in Politics

“It's a shame people like Chuck Schumer, who has been bought so many times by people in http://www.huffingtonpost.com/social/join.html?autojoin=1n=1 financial world, are in the senate, screwing up Americans' health care. The only way we are likely to get a decent healthcare system in this country is for the President to use his bully pulpit and shame our sticky-fingered Congress to have but one goal: serve the American public.”
Romer:

Romer: "We're Pursuing Every Legal Means" To Undo AIG Bonuses

Commented Mar 15, 2009 at 19:37:34 in Politics

“Nancy Pelosi and Mitch McConnell are the last people who should be outraged at what AIG does or does not do re bonuses. According to facts, the AIG bonuses ranged from $1,000 to $6.5 million. On the other hand, the average earmark was $13 million per Congressma­n/woman/se­nator. That is a figure which should disgust. Obama is disingenuous in the extreme, and thinks we are incredibly stupid, by allowing earmarks. No Congressman is worth $13 million.

What do you suppose a Congressman gets for delivering $13 million to his/her district or state. Finder's fees? You think? Sweetheart deals on their mortgages? Some already do. Waivers on laws regarding their holdings? Some already do. But they probably want more. They know what Samuel Gompers said when asked what Labor wanted.

Of course, Gompers was talking about people who worked for a living. All Congress does is take raises after helping to cause a financial catastrophe and putting thousands of Americans out of work. Did they do it alone? No, but at least that is the one bipartisan thing Congress and the likes of Nancy Pelosi and Mitch McConnell can take credit for. They allowed a disaster to happen on their watch, and then they put their hands in our pockets yet again.

The President should be ashamed for not calling them on it, but then he is the product of the Illinois legislature and the U.S. Senate and he may not know right from wrong, either.”

Didactic Curveball replied on Mar 15, 2009 at 20:42:04

“Your comments are ridiculous. You are trying to make a connection between two entirely unrelated things. Earmarks (responsible ones) benefits the citizens of a specific Congressional district. Corporate bonuses benefit a single individual.

Why am I bothering. Some things can't be dumbed down enough for some people.”

nunzia replied on Mar 15, 2009 at 19:48:57

“These two issues are not analogous.

"earmark" doesn't mean "corruption".”

StevieRae replied on Mar 15, 2009 at 19:47:09

“Might be useful if not scary for you to read the following article in the NY Times:

http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/03/09/aig-where-taxpayers-dollars-go-to-die/?scp=6&sq=aig&st=cse

The bonus fracas is small change compared to AIG's Credit Default Sways. Insurance contracts. We need to find out if these contract can be cancelled.­......let'­s not waste our time on the bonuses, chump change!”