HuffPost Social News

schmuckwithearlaps's Comments (113)

View Comments:   Sort:
next
1 - 25 of 113
huffingtonpost entry

Heads Should Roll Over Obama State Dinner Security Breach

Commented Nov 28, 2009 at 13:13:52 in Politics

“Very good comment! If there is a bright side to this whole mess it is that it has brought out the best in Huff Post readers. I have seldom seen such a bunch of good insightful comments. More women would make it harder for a blonde to charm a bunch of males in black suits. I would love to see Stacy London trained to work for the secret service. She would look critically at how every woman is dressed to check for every variety of weapon. Sorry, I guess my comment does not live up to the high standards other readers have set.”

Eykis replied on Nov 28, 2009 at 15:29:50

“Schmuck,

Actually your commen was COMIC RELIEF from a serious situation. Thanks.”
huffingtonpost entry

White House Security?

Commented Nov 27, 2009 at 20:34:04 in Politics

“Excellent comment. You have something original to say. That is so rare, I have to compliment you.
I also compliment Henry C. for noting that the public address system was compromised too. Remember the Clint Eastwood movie about the Secret Service and how those guys really cared. Apparently not everyone in Washington thinks of their Secret Service job as anything but one more nine to five job. Mumbai can happen here, it is only a matter of degree.”
huffingtonpost entry

Insurers Royally Played Obama

Commented Oct 14, 2009 at 14:13:28 in Home

“We need to look at the facts. There has been a love-hate relationship between government and private health care for decades, and liberals have joined conservatives in this process. Many of the companies we now call insurers (because that is easier to hate) are managed care companies who were encouraged to control costs by limiting unnecessary procedures and waste. Remember all the stories about unnecessary surgery in the 70's and 80's? HMOs were encouraged to enroll seniors to cut the cost of Medicare. Unfortunately, it turned out to be just the opposite. Many of the "evil" insurance companies are actually non profit companies with no shareholders, including many Blue Cross and Blue Shield plans and Kaiser, with its countless million members. Kaiser is the closest thing to what a single payer system would look like, and everyone complains about wait times. Obama is no fool. No one has played him. He and his advisors are smart enough to understand that HMOs including Kaiser have a lot to teach us about well run health care. Perfect? No, but let's not throw out the baby with the bathwater and pretend that managed care has been nothing but a rip off. In fact, I support a public option, but I try to do so based on an understanding of the true state of our current system, not a liberal fantasy that rivals in accuracy that of the conservatives.”
huffingtonpost entry

The Good Kind of Rape

Commented Oct 01, 2009 at 15:17:35 in Entertainment

“Why can't Americans deal with something that is complicated, with no right or wrong slam dunks? Yes, he did a terrible thing and no one rich or poor can be excused from raping a child based on the perp's bad life experiences. Now the hard part. I am tired of the "Get the Jew" self righteous rhetoric that I have been hearing the since this story broke. Just like the majority of criticism of Obama is pure and simple racism, the majority of hate directed at RP is because he is a Hollywood Jew. Grow up. What I am saying is true. Yesterday the British pulled a nude photo of ten year old Brooke Sheilds from the Tate Galley. That picture has been seen by millions of people for thirty years, but hey, let's strike a blow for protecting children! Let's also protect children by passing national health insurance and gun control when we can take a break from seeing the world only through show business. What an irony that Michael Jackson was put to rest with tons of forgiveness so recently. Was what he did the children more than an inch or two different than RP's crime?”

TRYKER replied on Oct 01, 2009 at 17:35:41

“Sorry...no one has been talking about "the Jew" at all...until you tried to jam it into the conversation as another lame attempt to throw the conversation into one about the Jews and not the child-rapist.
No one cares what nationality he is...who cares?
There isn't any exception in child-rape laws for some nationality over another. tsk tsk Lame.”

piul05 replied on Oct 01, 2009 at 16:45:42

“Congratulations for being the first person to come up with the anti-semitic card, even though you can't point out a single post where anyone makes reference to his ethnicity/religion. Pretty lame way of defending a pervert.

Incidentally, according to wikipedia:

"Polanski was born Rajmund Roman Liebling in Paris, France, the son of Bula (née Katz-Przedborska) and Ryszard Liebling (aka Ryszard Polański), who was a painter and plastics manufacturer. Polanski's parents were agnostics. His mother had a daughter, Annette, by her previous husband. His father was a Polish Jew and his mother, born in Imperial Russia due to Partitions of Poland, was brought up as a Catholic as she had a Jewish father and a Polish Roman Catholic mother."”

wired replied on Oct 01, 2009 at 15:56:51

“"Why can't Americans deal..." Now, that is a loaded opening line. From which "country" are writing?”

Theda replied on Oct 01, 2009 at 15:55:09

“This has nothing to do with racism or anti-semetism. Most people are repulsed at the idea of a 45 year old man raping and sodomizing a 13-year old girl.
And no one forced Polanski to do it.”

caligyrl74 replied on Oct 01, 2009 at 15:54:20

“First of all Michael Jackson was not convicted of ANYTHING - he had his day in court and was found not guilty. The two are in no way similar.

Secondly, Roman had his day in court and well... we all know what happened. The Jew comments come out of left field - every other argument is weak and ineffective so hey LET'S PLAY THE RACE CARD.

This is about justice. Not about what the victim wants at this point, or what Roman's defenders want, it's about the state of CA finally being able to hold a criminal accountable for a crime they admitted to committing.

Your comment about American's not being able to deal with complicated issues is insulting and unwarranted. This isn't a complicated issue at all, the only thing that complicates it is the weak ass arguments coming from people who would rather see a guilty man go free because he's 'gifted' than see justice served. Roman Polanski raped an underage girl and no amount of time or distance excuses that as he and all his supporters are finding out.

Thanks to CA 's DNA databank, in LA they recently arrested a man for a string of rapes and murders dating back to the early 70's, maybe we should just let him go since it's been so long and he's been a good boy since then.”

swingerofbirches replied on Oct 01, 2009 at 15:53:39

“What forgiveness was needed for MJ? The government spent millions trying to pin something on him and couldn't. He was legally innocent, and in my opinion/guess innocent of all those charges, as well.

RP admitted to this crime. And I didn't even know he was Jewish until you mentioned it. The LAPD also ticketed Mel GIbson with a crime. If they hate Jews so much they should have let Mel off easy.

What RP did was wrong and fleeing from his punishment was wrong.”

cpoindex replied on Oct 01, 2009 at 15:49:43

“The funny thing is that this case is as much of a slum dunk black & white straight forward case as you can get. Is she the age of consent? No. If she were the AoC did she consent? No. Did he deny he did the underlying acts of the crime? No. Tell me where the gray areas are?

Also, there is a huge difference between what RP did and MJJ allegedly did because there is serious doubt that MJJ did the crimes he is accused of. The first alleged victim recanted, he was found innocent of any wrong doing in connection with the second allegation and no other alleged victims have come forward. Contrast that with RP who does not contest that he raped a13 year old girl.”

JoeinNH replied on Oct 01, 2009 at 15:42:36

“What is this nonsense about people who think he deserves to sit in jail being jew haters????Point out the comment here or elsewhere that is anti-semitic. And people saying having suffered at the hands of Nazis because he was Jewish does not give him a get out of jail card is not anti-semitic or is that what you mean?

I was no fan of Jackson but at least he went through a trial and found innocent. I didn't think he was innocent but that is what the jury said. He didn't run.

And it is black and white- rape another and especially a child and it can be 3 years or 30 years or 300 years later but you should still pay. Not hard at all.”

Pierogi kid replied on Oct 01, 2009 at 15:35:27

“nice straw man.”

bnyb replied on Oct 01, 2009 at 15:33:22

“fanned.”
Barack Obama Must See Michael Moore's New Movie (and So Must You)!

Barack Obama Must See Michael Moore's New Movie (and So Must You)!

Commented Sep 27, 2009 at 19:01:37 in Business

“While it is still on the Internet, everyone MUST see the Fox news take on MM's new movie. It is beyond anything my imagination might have created, and all I can think of is "this must be a SNL parody of Fox News" but it is for real.”

burningviolin replied on Sep 27, 2009 at 21:20:07

“Is this the Fox News segment you refered to? It does contain some over the top moments. Mostly, it's just Fox being Fox: uninformative and slanderous.

FOX News & Tom Tancredo Attack Michael Moore's New Film & Obama

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dMXnYe4tI9k

shimarlie replied on Sep 27, 2009 at 20:30:39

“Would love to. Do you have a link or anymore information?”
Why the President Has Been Losing on Health Care, and What He Needs to Say

Why the President Has Been Losing on Health Care, and What He Needs to Say

Commented Sep 08, 2009 at 14:44:38 in Politics

“Until recently, I scoffed at the town hall protesters and wrote them off as fringe groups. Now I am not so sure. It seems obvious that millions of Americans are balking at supporting Obama at this point in time. The reason is because they are frightened and vulnerable. Glenn Beck is having a field day because he is at the right place at the right time to lead the mob. The MSM are equally responsible. There is nothing that Glenn, Sean and Rush might say that will not dominate the 6 o'clock news. If these guys start talking about impeaching Obama today that is all that we will hear about from the MSM this evening. All they need is a hooklet. I just invented that word to mean they did not even need a very big hook. If they can figure out a way of going from point A to point B on an impeachment argument, then no one will be talking about another subject for months. And if they can get one wacko Congressperson to introduce articles of impeachment, the ball game will be over for health care reform. The question is, can we do anything to turn this around? I doubt it.”
huffingtonpost entry

The President and the Vigilantes

Commented Sep 07, 2009 at 13:33:33 in Politics

“This is one of the best posts I have ready since Obama took office. It may not follow the liberal party line but if liberals are listening and if this is read at the White House, tons of good might be done.”
huffingtonpost entry

The Myths of the Battle of Health Care Reform

Commented Sep 03, 2009 at 13:35:29 in Politics

“Here are some additional myths about health care reform:
4. The President has done a good job of explaining the basics to the general public. In fact, he has opened the door to the right wing wackos by not explaining in simple terms what is going on.
5. Liberals are united on this topic. Most liberals want to die on the cross of single payer. Then there is a large group that supports the public option without knowing enough about it to last for 15 seconds in a debate with an opponent of health care.
6. We can predict the results of the public option on competition. Good luck!
7. The health insurance companies are behind the town hall nuts. The fact is that fringe groups are behind the town hall nuts. Ever notice the resemblance between these people and the ones who used to yell at you at airports?
8. With the public option we will all live happily ever after. While I support the public option as the best choice on the table now, health care reform is very complex and uncertain. Ideally, reform will mean good dignified care for all at a price we can afford. If we get there if will be more luck than brains. The tug of war in health care is being waged by multiple parties and we can all get torn to shreds while the victory is pushed and pulled from one camp to another.”
huffingtonpost entry

Lessons in Leadership: Why Obama Needs to Brush Up on His FDR

Commented Aug 29, 2009 at 14:57:15 in Politics

“This is a really important topic. I put it another way: "What is the missing piece that causes us (yes, us) to fail and let's the right wing set the table?" I find it too easy to but the burden on the President. Sometimes the people need to rise up and be heard. The town hall loud mouths have been declared by the MSM and Sen Grassley to be the true majority and we have sat back and taken it. I do not just mean liberals, I mean everyone to the left of Sean Hannity. I can't believe that more than 15% of Americans are right wing wackos. So why are the wackos always heard above the rest of us? I can't entirely blame the MSM, honestly, although they are easily duped, if not already corrupted to the core.
The truth is the liberals and moderates have been corrupted also. People are taking seven or eight prescription drugs a day including happy pills to make them harmless. They are enthralled by HDTV, video games, Starbucks, Perez Hilton, and everything else that distracts from action. Why worry about universal health care when you can worry about John and Kate?
We have made ourselves into passive, useless sheep who have lost our edge, lost our will to fight and lost our willingness to get hurt or die for the right cause. The first step in the right direction is to walk to the mirror and then look at it.”
huffingtonpost entry

How to Win Friends and Influence People by Practicing Social Arbitrage

Commented Aug 28, 2009 at 00:58:18 in Business

“With all due respect, this article is too brief to be of any help. It states the gentleman's opinion with no evidence or examples that this is good advice. It assumes that the person giving out free advice all day is competent to do so. There was a time that the word for someone who attempted to solve other people's problems before his was asked was known as a busybody. I do not doubt that the author can prove his point, it is just that he has not done so in this post. I realize I can read all his books and attend his lectures to learn more, but a post like this ideally will stand on its own. This is an interesting topic, and I am sure the author is most qualified to address it, but I am left with the old cliche "a little learning is a dangerous thing." I do not want to see tens of thousands of liberals reading this piece and going off half cocked and giving out gratuitous advice!”

outnow replied on Aug 28, 2009 at 12:41:05

“A free e-book to customers or being identified as a reliable source of information keeps people coming back to you for your opinions and solutions. You may need a professional degree or two or three.

Putting bread upon the water often results in more loaves for you.

I spend two hours per day in free consulting. People perceive me as a reliable source of information. If they want more information, they call me or visit my website. I have videos, yellow pages, and internet sources. Blogs and social networking may help.”

mariah793 replied on Aug 28, 2009 at 03:26:38

“He's not talking about "advice". He's talking about "information" and "building linkages" between people. It's a down-home, community virtue. Community Organizing 101. It's not only common sense, but also based on "exchange theory": do good unto others before they have a chance to do good unto you.”
huffingtonpost entry

Ted Kennedy's Passing: An Inestimable Loss

Commented Aug 26, 2009 at 19:22:21 in Politics

“I appreciate all the thoughtful comments to my post. I hate to be negative at this moment in history, and I will attempt to regain some positive thinking despite the health care reform debacle.”
huffingtonpost entry

Ted Kennedy's Passing: An Inestimable Loss

Commented Aug 26, 2009 at 15:24:25 in Politics

“I wish I could mourn without feeling angry today. Rather than remembering Ted, all I can think about is how the right wing and the main stream media (pardon me for being redundant) would not allow anything but total praise to be heard anywhere in America when Pres. Reagan passed away, but today, the airwaves and Internet will be full of venom and hate against the Kennedy family. Sorry to be so negative, but Ted's death comes at a time where he did not live to see the sad fact that liberals can't fight, and having won in November we can't wait to surrender that victory to the fascist mob. Sad but true.”

fuel4thefire replied on Aug 26, 2009 at 18:35:08

“Not so; everyday the ACLU fights for the rights of Americans and typically is characterized as liberal; many liberals are members of unions; many liberals support Democracy Now and MoveOn.org; many liberals speak to their friends and colleagues about current issues and serve to get out the vote; many liberals blog, and sign petitions and call representative offices; many liberals march and demonstrate and protest; i am not sure who you are talking about, but i do know the mass media run by corporations are disrespectful of any one left of center and rarely air their views without bias and vitriol; the RNC communication machine repeatedly slanders anyone who is a liberal and has propagandized about the evil and immoral nature of liberals; Edward Kennedy, a liberal democrat, was quite aware of the viciousness of the right-wing in this country and fought for 40 years to counter their ideology -- now it is time for US as individuals to take his lead and demand healthcare for every American as a right.”

ka8uet replied on Aug 26, 2009 at 16:39:52

“Tedd Kennedy was a man who overcame deep personal flaws to leave a legacy of legislation which will not only outlive him, but has had a greater effect on our country than many Presidents, including his own brother. He was always aware of the common man, and tried to get national health care passes almost from the beginning of his career. He was opposed to the current wars, but fought for proper equipment for the soldiers. He opposed the war, not the warriers. For all his wealth, he never forgot the rest of us, and only those whose lives he touched individually know the depth of his caring. We have lost a lion, indeed. We have lost a deeplyu human and humane individual who cannot be replaced. We mourn his passing.”

MontanaBlue replied on Aug 26, 2009 at 16:26:28

“Teddy never lost hope. We can't either. Hang in there.”

OC4Obama4Pres replied on Aug 26, 2009 at 16:14:39

“Sounds like you've given up when we've just begun to fight. Did you not read that Senator Kennedy introduced a bill for universal health care way back in 1969 and Never Stopped Fighting for it? The wing-nuts will always be here in this country in one form or another and the one thing their leaders most want to count on is us giving up or better yet distracted by our urge to consume and soon as the economy turns around. This is or opportunity to fight harder and for once let the opposition know that we will not back down, that we are proud to be liberals, and we won't stop till we get what we want even if that means helping those poor idiots on the right in spite of themselves.”
huffingtonpost entry

Stop Panicking About Obama

Commented Aug 24, 2009 at 20:21:22 in Politics

“Tell it the way it is! The big three....unemployment, Afganistan and health care. Three stikes and you're out. Obama is looking like one more second rate Democrat. He should be out of both foreign wars by now, be doing SOMETHING about nobody working, and leading the charge on heatlh care reform. Instead he is sending more young people to die in Afganistan, engaging in trickle down economics, and afraid of his own shadow on health care. Third party, anyone?”

callinguonit replied on Aug 24, 2009 at 22:06:32

“Yeah...now run along and start one.”

NoCorporatePersonhood replied on Aug 24, 2009 at 20:38:26

“3rd party for me. We need to vote for people we really believe in and trust and not exclude them from consideration because they have "no chance" to win. I always though that was a very odd mentality.

With two parties that have been bought and sold by corporations, we have no other option except to vote 3rd party or become modern day serfs to corporations. How many people out there can't won't leave a job because they lose there insurance. i know people who consider themselves lucky to work 50 hours a week and make 30k per year.

They though they were free”
huffingtonpost entry

Obama is Stalin! And a Cartoon by Lyndon LaRouche

Commented Aug 21, 2009 at 12:09:14 in Politics

“Chris is right. Why is no one asking, "What would Uncle Joe say?" Uncle Joe would be against death panels. After all he is the one who said "When one person dies its a tragedy, when a million people are enrolled in Blue Cross its a statistic". That should be Obama's slogan! When one person dies its a tragedy. Stalin also said "How many divisions has the Pope?" By this he meant that the Pope was very good at dividing public opinion on payment for abortions. But mainly Stalin is remembered fondly for two things. First, the Stalin-Hitler pact of 1939 led directed to World War Two the following month. Second, Stalin's trust of Hitler led to Operation Barbarosa in 1941 in which ten million Russians were killed because they were unprepared for Hitler's surprise attack. This puts him in a class with the Senate republicans whose pockets are so bulging with health insurance company money that they care nothing for their people, and do not know who the enemies really are. Grassley will sooner than later have the same expression on his face that Uncle Joe had when he heard the news that Hitler's troops crossed into Russian territory. If I recall, his comment was "Uh, oh." It will happen when the insurance companies abandon him when he is no longer of use to them the day after they kill health care reform.”

alex92ut replied on Aug 22, 2009 at 02:16:13

“Koolade addicts all of you. You just repeat what the left wing programs you to repeat. You believe everything they say. There are real ways to lower the cost of health insurance. Read hr 3400. It's the Republican health care plan. It addresses tort reform and cross-state competition.

1965 Medicare was passed, projected cost in 1970, 3.1B. Actual cost, 6.8 B.
Projected cost for 1990, 12 B. Actual cost 110 B.
Cost for first nine months of this fiscal year, 314 B. (WSJ 6 Aug 2009)

Congressional Budget Office projected cost for hr 3200 10 yrs, 1.1T.
Actual cost?????
But it won't be 1.1T. Will it cost 2 times more like in 1970 for Medicare?
Or will it be 10 times more like Medicare in 1990?
How about 44 yrs? Will it be 100 times more like Medicare in 2009?

We can't afford this! There is no way the economy will grow to fit the monster!
This plan will drive small business into the ground. Fewer jobs. Less tax from the small businesses that fold. Less tax from the laid off workers resulting from closing businesses.
Larger companies will flee to countries that don't tax them so highly for health care and carbon emissions. So less tax from big companies leaving the country and less from the workers who lose their jobs because large companies go where they can make a profit.
Who will be left to pay for government run health care??”

"Death Panel" Scare Tactic May Backfire on Republicans

Commented Aug 17, 2009 at 13:45:46 in Politics

“This is a time for a little bit of liberal self critcism. We blew it, and have no one to blame but ourselves. Because we believe(d) Obama could do no wrong, we stood by and watched him mess up his chances on health care reform. Yes, have fun blaming the evil insurance companies and the Republican thugs, but the fact is this mess is our fauilt. We liberals are divided among the fanatics for single payer who do not read the British press accounts of the horrors of single payer care, and the Obama worshipers who can't believe he can be a bad politician. Read the articles in the Guardian about British death hospitals before you complain about dealth panel rumors.
We could have had health care reform this year if liberals had joined together on a plan that could be articulated in five sentences and that everyone from Obama to Barbara Boxer fought for every day for the past six months. Instead the Republicans and wacko talk radio jocks are doing their "thing" like any good wind up dolls, and we are standing there with our ***** in our hands, if you pardon the Godfather reference. It is simple, folks. Unite around a clearly understood, clearly articulated plan. Uniting around smoke and mirrors does not work.”

Lightfoot Letters replied on Aug 17, 2009 at 18:23:55

“Your evaluation is excellent...except...Being, a liberal or liberalism, has nothing to do with social engineering concepts of the Democrat Party or the Republican Party. As, a liberal myself, I would greatly appreciate if you use another word for 'authoritarian socialism, or 'authoritarian philosophy' or just plain 'old socialism.' And, any other government program which the Federal Government sets goals, policy, wages, benefits and by law requires the private sector to do the work....this is not liberalism of any kind.”

GeeBee replied on Aug 17, 2009 at 14:11:07

“I'm with you. The whole thing has been too rushed, and the message has been muddled. Just a perfect setup for the righties and their talking heads to latch on and distort everything.

However you are dead wrong about "British press accounts of the horrors of single payer care" - the British people are royally pissed off about the way their system has been misrepresented. No-one there thinks it's perfect. I have a sister and brother-in-law and several cousins all working in the NHS, and you don't want to get any of them started on some of its flaws. However it is still regarded as a national treasure.”
English Healthcare in the US Reform Debate: Setting the Record Straight

English Healthcare in the US Reform Debate: Setting the Record Straight

Commented Aug 15, 2009 at 14:59:50 in Politics

“I am really shocked that you would not display my last comment. All I was trying to say is that I agree with the author that a country's progress in health care reform is based on its social history since WW two. In our country the big change was the conversion of the health insurance industry from non-profit to for profit, and the long term impact of that change. In addition, our government system is what is killing health care reform, traced to the 1789 system left behind by our so called founding fathers, including the wonderful Senate with small states out-voting big states, that does not work in 2009. I concluded with the thought that this is a Republic not a democracy as the right wingers say, and that is the crying shame.”

CulpeperMin replied on Aug 17, 2009 at 10:00:43

“As you in your infinite wisdom, and in spite of the stern warnings from those same loathsome founders as to the dangers of democracy, know better?

This site alone makes me thank posterity for the Republic everyday, as the rule of law is all that prevents many of this ilk from fully deploying the Tyranny of Good Intentions.

Come and take it.”
The Media's Treatment of Palin's Outrageous

The Media's Treatment of Palin's Outrageous "Death Panel" Claims

Commented Aug 11, 2009 at 09:44:16 in Media

“The truth is that we have death panels now. In California, one example of a death panel is the block of Republican legislators that demanded that health care for the poor be cut from the state budget.”
huffingtonpost entry

Congress Is Behaving as if the Health Care System Isn't in Tatters

Commented Jul 21, 2009 at 00:21:57 in Politics

“Obama has made two serious mistakes that he can't blame on the Republicans. Most importantly, he has not given the public a three minute version of the health care reform package that people can understand. It is easy for the right to throw punches at health care reform but tough for liberals to fight back if we can't articulate the President's program. We can all explain what is wrong with the current "system" and what we want, but I defy anyone to tell me in simply words what the President has put on the table. For example, explain how the public option works, and how the country will not--as the conservatives say--go broke. Obama needs to help the public support his plan by helping the public know what it is.
The second problem is the scant attention being given to long term care. A hundred million families above the poverty line are squirreling away a hundred thousand dollars per family for "nursing home money" because they know that long term care insurance is not worth the paper it is written on. If Obama's plan covered long term care, that would free up a trillion dollars that could jump start the economy instead of being hidden the mattresses of America waiting to be paid to nursing homes.
Admit it, everyone knows that middle class families have a nest egg they can't touch because it is nursing home money. It is America's dirty little secret.”

clevelandchick replied on Jul 21, 2009 at 07:43:39

“You make some great points, especially about long term care. The dirty little secret about nursing homes is that many people could stay a heck of a lot longer in their own homes and use visiting nurses and home health aides. Or there could be a tax break for family members who stay home and take care of their loved one.

Nursing homes do not deliver the value for what they charge. My dad had to spend a month in one. They didn't even give him the Medicare reimbursed physical therapy until we pitched a fit for two weeks. They fed him high salt high fat disgusting cheap food like hotdogs and french fries....a man who had quadruple bypass surgery with high blood pressure and diabetes. His room had a single bed with one small lite behind it and a 13" TV. They charged $5,000 for the month. Talk about ripping off Medicare. He could have stayed at The Ritz Carlton for that much.”

Danster replied on Jul 21, 2009 at 01:02:54

“I think the president lacks the working details for many of his planed programs. He knows generally what he wants but is detached from the details and makes a HUGE mistake by letting his congressional fellow craft the legislation. The Cap and Trade disaster as well as the mess that was supposed to be stimilus are exhibits 1 and 2. He needs to take his time and craft a healthcare bill that makes sense ,can be paid for and will improve heathcare. If I were and advisor I would take a close look at the Swiss system. It works VERY well, better then Canada and the UK.
Mandatory insurance is required, the gov't pays for those that can't afford it and here is the key, and they CLOSELY regulate the insurance companies. They also prohibit stupid law suits and limit waste on tests that are just CYA for our current medical system. Check into it. It really seems to work, it is not cheap but it is cost effective.”
Who Killed Obama's Health Care Reform?

Who Killed Obama's Health Care Reform?

Commented Jul 11, 2009 at 12:37:05 in Politics

“Excellent post. I have never seen it said better. And if only "you know who" would get his ass back on American soil and fight for the public option, we might finally have it. In my business work I often talk to executives in the health insurance industry, and the one truth that stands out above all is that you can't reason with these people. They only understand brute force. The idea that insurance companies can turn someone out like a dog needs to be crushed by the force of the American people. It hundreds of thousands can dare take to the streets in Iran, are we not morally obligated to show some courage on this life and death issue of health care? By the way, millions of people above the poverty line are hoarding hundreds of thousands of dollars per family for future nursing home care. This dirty little secret will become tomorrow's news. Americans know that commercial for profit long term care insurance policies aren't worth the paper they are printed on, and long term care needs to be part of health care reform. It might help the economy if a hundred million middle class people no long need to keep their money in hiding for future nursing home costs.”

Firbolg replied on Jul 11, 2009 at 14:04:40

“I also heartily agree.
Americans are waking up to how abysmal our system is and how little the “reforms” will change it.
They realize the problem is insurance. Insurance is for risk. It is a necessary component in any economy. Sensibly its business model requires it to refuse or discard bad risks. It must profit to continue to provide that service. That is why it is totally unsuitable for healthcare.
Alerted to what the rest of the world takes for granted, we feel we deserve no less.
The industry and its indentured politicians, realizing that their arguments for keeping the status quo with a few tweaks are getting less plausible every minute, are rushing to pass legislation as quickly as possible ahead of this awakening.
They are aided by the media who chant “forget single payer”, while praising the so called savings offered by PhRMA and the hospitals that Obama welcomes as well.
The president wants healthcare reform. He is no dummy and knows that dressing up a bad act passed quickly will be a lot easier with his following, compliant media and oratorical skills than persuading congress members to set aside their campaign contributions and promises of cushy private sector jobs.
There appears to be no good outcome on the horizon for Americans. We should ask ourselves how the dream of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness came to this sorry state.
Read this and ponder.
http://www.alternet.org/healthwellness/140918
huffingtonpost entry

No, President Obama; We Should NOT Shut Up About Health Care Reform

Commented Jul 06, 2009 at 09:22:23 in Politics

“Lee, I think you should accept the fact that you made your personal household situation a center piece of your article. I think any decent reader will understand that you represent millions of people who want good health coverage for their families. There is no quesiton that 47 million uninsured and another tens of millions of under insured is a disgrace to our country. Where some of us disagree relates to the "how" we solve this problem. Single payer may look good to people who understandably feel that any complete coverage is better than the current system. Once your ship comes in and you have a "house with the white picket fence" you will join the (perhaps slim) majority of people who want true quality health care, not just health care. Your family deserves more than the British system with its substandard hospitals that are well documented in the British press, the VA with its unsanitized instruments and the waiting times of the Canadian system. We should work together to have a system that is acceptable both to people with a steady income and those without. Obama appears to me to be on the right track with his plan to cover the uninsured while pressing private insurance to shape up.”

peaceplez replied on Jul 06, 2009 at 11:06:47

“What about France "Schmuck..".?! I have health insurance and I wait an ungodly amount of time to see my doctor. My father was in the military when I was growing up, we had fabulous healthcare (back when). The VA doesn't have to be in abysmal shape.”
huffingtonpost entry

No, President Obama; We Should NOT Shut Up About Health Care Reform

Commented Jul 06, 2009 at 00:58:19 in Politics

“Sorry, you guys are just leaving yourselves out of the debate by pushing single payer. This debate is about how the public option can lead to covering the uninsured and putting private insurance in a position where that industry needs to operate more efficiently and lower the cost of health care.
This has nothing to do with how good single payer systems are in other countries. Ever hear of the VA scandals of the past several months? Ever go on the Guardian web site and look up shocking articles of Britain's death hospitals? Do we want to get our care at the Los Angeles public hospital where janitors swept around dead bodies on the waiting room floor? The only issue today is shaping a public option that covers the uninsured and forces the private insurers to shape up. Yes, that requires some deeper thought than "let's copy Canada".”

Peabodies replied on Jul 06, 2009 at 10:00:14

“schmuck -- or copy Japan, or Germany, or Taiwan, or the U.K. (or Italy, or Spain, or the Netherlands, or most other countries on the planet ...)

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/sickaroundtheworld/

hughfree replied on Jul 06, 2009 at 09:56:07

“Yawn, more horror stories about other countries. You really and truly don't understand how good those other developed countries have it compared to the US. I've lived, worked and gotten health care in third world countries with better health plans than the US.”

castlerider replied on Jul 06, 2009 at 09:17:10

“You don't know aht you're talking about. This isn't the UK, and this isn't Canada. It's America.

If we set out boldly to do what can be done, getting healthcare to every American the same as elected representatives get, we can show the world how it's done. Spineless jellyfish who insist that it's too late, its already been bought by the rich don't even deserve to reap such benefits, and are often on the take, or might as well be.
Take your fear mongering and go home.
.”

phasor replied on Jul 06, 2009 at 08:19:52

“schmuckwithearlaps's comment is the kind political trash and scare tactics so much admired by GOP trolls.

An insurance company has a fiduciary duty, by law, to maximize profits for its share holders. For health insurance this means increasing premiums and/or denying or limiting health care. There is no other way for private insurance companies to act.

Under a single payer proposal there is public insurance and private providers.

All G8 countries, except the U.S., have a form of single payer. None of those peoples would change their health care system to a U.S. style system.

Educate yourself before you advocate a position.”
The Real Story Behind Palin's Bombshell

The Real Story Behind Palin's Bombshell

Commented Jul 05, 2009 at 11:56:33 in Politics

“To paraphrase Allen Ginsberg, the Republicans have seen the best minds of their generation destroyed by madness. Palin, Gingrich and all the rest of the otherwise born leaders are wandering the streets at dawn looking for the fix of power. What is worse is that 40% of Americans are wandering the streets with them, looking for the good old days when white was right, and if you were brown the best you could hope for was to be able to stick around. These are deepseated frustrations. It has taken Palin many months to realize that she lost the election. Now, in July, she is starting to express her reaction. Of course, to an objective person, she was her worst enemy and a little more positive policy ideation and a little less "pals around with terrorists" might have made her the Dick Cheney of 2009. Sorry, I should have suppressed that thought. Destroyed by madness.”
Here's What We Know About Sarah Palin's Decision

Here's What We Know About Sarah Palin's Decision

Commented Jul 05, 2009 at 00:29:36 in Politics

“You mean real conservatives do not use phrases like "a liberal art form"? :]”
Here's What We Know About Sarah Palin's Decision

Here's What We Know About Sarah Palin's Decision

Commented Jul 04, 2009 at 21:37:45 in Politics

“While Sarah Palin bashing has become a liberal art form, we should not forget that despite the circus atmosphere, or behind it, Sarah Palin does stand for something important. She has touched the minds and hearts of millions of patriotic Americans who are pro-life, fear the continued Russian threat to America, and loath the Hollywood ethic of looking down on people who work for a living. Yes, Obama won the election, and Sarah now finally knows that she lost and is going away, but she takes with her more than a hundred million Americans who "will be back".”

cmilburn replied on Jul 05, 2009 at 01:00:16

“"...the Hollywood ethic of looking down on people who work for a living." Are you kidding? Since you clearly have never been on the set of a movie (as I have), I can tell you that those people bust their humps on a movie set. Most of the time it's 12 hour days, too. If this is sarcasm, it's well hidden. If not, then you are practicing exactly what you accuse the "Hollywood" people of doing but in reverse. Repub talking points.”

sonshine replied on Jul 05, 2009 at 00:31:03

“Fu-nny! If she is so influential, why did she quit? This quitting that she did is unprecedented in American politics. She made it clear that she just couldn't take the heat. Well, move on to something that isn't political and where you can push your religious agenda which only a small fraction of Americans want to hear. Good bye Sarah. She tried to pretend that the strange circumstances of her last son's birth and the teen pregnancy of her daughter were just "normal" occurances but I beg to differ. That stuff only happens to liberal, progressive, democrats who are in the inner city and mostly black. She doesn't fit into that demographic. Yet her followers tried to defend her. hahahahahah. In life, regardless of religion, you do reap what you sow. If you can't fight, don't get into the ring. Sarah just told us all that she cannot fight and I'm glad for that.”

Promise replied on Jul 05, 2009 at 00:23:35

“And don't forget Joe the Plumber!”

jdfast replied on Jul 05, 2009 at 00:13:29

“Damn, what planet are you living on? 100 million? are you nuts? Oh, I remember, you drank too much neo con kool aid.”

NoSillyName replied on Jul 04, 2009 at 23:52:43

“LOL, this is that line that made me guffaw:

"... loath the Hollywood ethic of looking down on people who work for a living."

Yes, all of us here follow the Hollywood ethic because we're all trust fund babies. NOT.”

GunneraGirl replied on Jul 04, 2009 at 23:47:54

“'loath the hollywood ethic of looking down on people who work'? huh?

if those 100 million are coming back, why won't they self-identify as republicans now?”

XCITIZEN replied on Jul 04, 2009 at 23:11:43

“Yes, and she with her ignorance and total lack of ethics, she is the ultimate Republican Role Model.”

clevelandchick replied on Jul 04, 2009 at 23:10:14

“I'm thinking this is sarcasm....really good sarcasm. The continued 'Russian' threat to America? If not, welcome back Rumplestiltskin, the Cold War is over.”

HarryMonster replied on Jul 04, 2009 at 23:09:50

“A hundred million? Wow. That's alot. Where were these hundred million last nov?”
Sarah Palin Turns Pro

Sarah Palin Turns Pro

Commented Jul 04, 2009 at 10:59:03 in Politics

“Palin now has a lock on the 2012 Republican presidential nomination. Her upcoming Fox news experience combined with $100,000 a speech engagements a hundred days a year will give her both the money and the ability to shape her message on her own terms that she needs. Better practice calling her President Palin, because that phrase will come in handy in January 2013. She will be at the right place at the right time to begin her two terms after America's sharp swing to the right begins when our unemployment rate hits 20% in 2011.”

ericmiami replied on Jul 04, 2009 at 12:41:18

“Nope. There aren't enough schmucks.”
next
1 - 25 of 113