special muppet's Comments (130)
Ted Kennedy, My Friend and Colleague
Commented Aug 26, 2009 at 22:49:57 in Politics
“This is "reconciliation" Byrd, isn't it?
Ok Mr Byrd... can we do this or what?”
Ok Mr Byrd... can we do this or what?”
Stop Panicking About Obama
Commented Aug 24, 2009 at 17:29:11 in Politics
“Obama is doing everything he promised to do during his campaign.
He said he'd withdraw from Iraq and re-focus on Afghanistan... that's what is happening.
He said he'd try to get bipartisan support for his agenda... he's trying.
He said he'd reform healthcare... there has been talk of little else on the airwaves for the last few months.
He said he'd close Guantanamo... he's managed to get some foreign countries to take the prisoners that Americans irrationally won't have on their soil. There's still a long way to go on that but at least he's trying.
He said he'd ban torture... he's signed off on it, and put in place a new special team for interrogations with clear rules on how suspected terrorists are to be treated.
He said he wanted to look forward, not back... that also seems to be what he's doing. There have been no words of incrimination for the actions of the previous administration, even though it might seem logical to remind people about them over and over.
He's doing pretty much what he said he'd do and you can't grumble about that.”
He said he'd withdraw from Iraq and re-focus on Afghanistan... that's what is happening.
He said he'd try to get bipartisan support for his agenda... he's trying.
He said he'd reform healthcare... there has been talk of little else on the airwaves for the last few months.
He said he'd close Guantanamo... he's managed to get some foreign countries to take the prisoners that Americans irrationally won't have on their soil. There's still a long way to go on that but at least he's trying.
He said he'd ban torture... he's signed off on it, and put in place a new special team for interrogations with clear rules on how suspected terrorists are to be treated.
He said he wanted to look forward, not back... that also seems to be what he's doing. There have been no words of incrimination for the actions of the previous administration, even though it might seem logical to remind people about them over and over.
He's doing pretty much what he said he'd do and you can't grumble about that.”
Roguewolf replied on Aug 24, 2009 at 18:27:15
“I think your name should be special puppet.”
EHarold replied on Aug 24, 2009 at 17:38:14
“What dimension are you living in?”
Health Reform: Throwing Good Money After the Bad
Commented Aug 24, 2009 at 14:14:38 in Politics
“I don't expect the health reform bill to fix everything overnight, but a public option will go a long way towards setting America on the right path.
I would expect that were a public option to pass as part of the bill, it would soon become the biggest insurer in the country and would therefore able to negotiate lower prices for care and eliminate wasteful practices.
Without the public option, there can be no meaningful reform.”
I would expect that were a public option to pass as part of the bill, it would soon become the biggest insurer in the country and would therefore able to negotiate lower prices for care and eliminate wasteful practices.
Without the public option, there can be no meaningful reform.”
JanP replied on Aug 24, 2009 at 15:53:30
“A public optione ventually means no private option becuase Obama prefers single payer (i.e. government only).”
Stand Up, Max Baucus
Commented Aug 19, 2009 at 10:31:17 in Politics
“Do that face from the end of Invasion of The Body Snatchers! That'll put the fear into him :)”
How Tough is Our President?
Commented Aug 18, 2009 at 20:47:40 in Politics
“I think Obama is playing it very strategically. I don't want to have to spell out exactly what he's doing. It should be pretty obvious to anyone who has faith in his abilities and intelligence. What is increasingly clear is that the right-wing protests are burning themselves out, and the progressive backlash to them is gaining momentum. It has become a battle between the ignorant and deranged vs the concerned citizens of America. A smart man could've predicted that.”
codycap replied on Aug 18, 2009 at 21:15:22
“
I can't help but remember the last two times It we had battles between the ignorant and deranged vs the concerned citizens of America.
The elections of 2000 and 2004
Thats what scares me.”
I can't help but remember the last two times It we had battles between the ignorant and deranged vs the concerned citizens of America.
The elections of 2000 and 2004
Thats what scares me.”
Three Reasons Why a Strong Public Option is Likely to be Part of Health Insurance Reform
Commented Aug 18, 2009 at 14:48:45 in Politics
“Health Insurance is already a tax that disproportionately affects the middle class.”
Three Reasons Why a Strong Public Option is Likely to be Part of Health Insurance Reform
Commented Aug 18, 2009 at 13:48:05 in Politics
“I think you may have tapped into Obama's thoughts.”
Wallysmom replied on Aug 18, 2009 at 13:54:05
“all my fingers and toes are crossed (even my eyes...oops almost missed that tree....)”
Who Would Jesus Insure? Tea Party Dispatch From San Francisco
Commented Aug 17, 2009 at 12:25:52 in Politics
“I'm just worried that if progressives don't get exactly what they want this time, their apathy will cost us more Republicans elected to the senate. As if that's going to help us at all!
Unfortunately, what has become clear is that it doesn't matter how great your president is, as long as there are these loons from the party of NO in the senate, nothing can get done. Majority voting doesn't apply anymore, 51 votes isn't enough. You have to have two thirds of the senate in your corner, or the minority will just use the filibuster to prevent ANY legislation from passing. I'm sure that this wasn't how US democracy was supposed to be.”
Unfortunately, what has become clear is that it doesn't matter how great your president is, as long as there are these loons from the party of NO in the senate, nothing can get done. Majority voting doesn't apply anymore, 51 votes isn't enough. You have to have two thirds of the senate in your corner, or the minority will just use the filibuster to prevent ANY legislation from passing. I'm sure that this wasn't how US democracy was supposed to be.”
New Rule: A-hole in One Shouldn't Be Obama's Game
Commented Aug 15, 2009 at 15:51:18 in Comedy
“Obama campaigned on re-focusing on Afghanistan, and things are improving there for a lot of people. The military are out there building schools, securing the population, being more careful about how they engage the enemy than they have been in the past. Hearts and minds are being won. Where music was once banned, now men and women compete in televised Idol-like reality shows... together. Girls are now able to get an education. There has been progress that will disappear in an instant were we to withdraw anytime soon.
Afghanistan should have always been the focus of our attention, never Iraq, but I think we can succeed there with the right leadership... i.e. Obama leadership.
By success, I mean simply stabilizing the country so that it can govern and protect itself against the Taliban. That's all. Then we leave.
You're right about the golf though.”
Afghanistan should have always been the focus of our attention, never Iraq, but I think we can succeed there with the right leadership... i.e. Obama leadership.
By success, I mean simply stabilizing the country so that it can govern and protect itself against the Taliban. That's all. Then we leave.
You're right about the golf though.”
Leadbottom replied on Aug 15, 2009 at 20:22:09
“Fighting Afghanistan helped collapse the Soviet economy and it's doing the same to the U.S.
Defeating the Taliban always was a matter of policing, but the worlds largest supplier of arms, since the end of the WW2 has been continuously looking for new targets to justify its mind boggling military expenditures.
As far as leaving....wait till the oil in the region is gone..ie the size of the Iraqi embassy.
P.S. to be blunt no one gave a *7%k about the "education of girls" in Afghanistan before the retaliation for 9/11 became so bogged down, just as nobody had cared about "democracy' in Iraq until Bush couldn't find the Nukes.”
Defeating the Taliban always was a matter of policing, but the worlds largest supplier of arms, since the end of the WW2 has been continuously looking for new targets to justify its mind boggling military expenditures.
As far as leaving....wait till the oil in the region is gone..ie the size of the Iraqi embassy.
P.S. to be blunt no one gave a *7%k about the "education of girls" in Afghanistan before the retaliation for 9/11 became so bogged down, just as nobody had cared about "democracy' in Iraq until Bush couldn't find the Nukes.”
Health Care Protesters: Ask Them Questions At Obama's Grand Junction Town Hall
Commented Aug 14, 2009 at 11:29:31 in Politics
“Ask them how they feel about having a black president.”
myjoyy replied on Aug 14, 2009 at 14:52:14
“OMG! He's black?”
Change We Can Believe In: Feelings Toward the Administration by Those Who Elected It
Commented Aug 13, 2009 at 16:19:46 in Politics
“It would all have been so much better had McCain/Palin won the election. We'd been gripped in the greatest depression the world had ever seen because there would have been no bailouts or stimulus. The healthcare debate would have been resolved, because reform would never have even been on the table.
We could have seen the wars escalate as we tried regime change in Iran and a reversal of the Iraq pull-out.
On top of that we could have had Palin spewing uninformed nonsense on our nightly news, making Bush look like Winston Churchill in comparison, and watched McCain's presidency disintegrate before our eyes as America imploded.
Libs, stop your whining.”
We could have seen the wars escalate as we tried regime change in Iran and a reversal of the Iraq pull-out.
On top of that we could have had Palin spewing uninformed nonsense on our nightly news, making Bush look like Winston Churchill in comparison, and watched McCain's presidency disintegrate before our eyes as America imploded.
Libs, stop your whining.”
StealGeorgia replied on Aug 13, 2009 at 16:38:16
“Actually, Palin would have been shut up even more than Biden is now. As VP, she would have been in "an undisclosed location".
"What ever did happen to Hubert? Whatever did happen to he? Was he lost in the sauce? was he gathering moss, just waiting for his boss to sneeze?"”
"What ever did happen to Hubert? Whatever did happen to he? Was he lost in the sauce? was he gathering moss, just waiting for his boss to sneeze?"”
Change We Can Believe In: Feelings Toward the Administration by Those Who Elected It
Commented Aug 13, 2009 at 11:25:37 in Politics
“The government of every major financial player in the world has pumped billions into the financial system, and most economists agree that bank bailouts and stimulus packages in the US and abroad have averted what would have been a global depression on an unimaginable scale.
Regarding the healthcare debate, Obama ran on a platform of healthcare reform where "everything was on the table except the status quo". While stressing his personal preferences, he has recognized that bi-partisanship is important, even though the other side don't see it that way, and he's sticking to it.
So now he finds himself assailed from both sides, the right simply on principle, and the left for not taking a harder line against them.
I believe that in the long run, sticking to the principle of bi-partisanship is the way forward, even though the temptation at this stage must be very strong to abandon bi-partisanship in favor of "Bush" style executive power which circumvents the principles of democracy.
The left is criticising him for dealing directly behind closed doors with health insurance and pharma corporations, when clearly he is acting on his principles to find common ground with his opponents as he has tried to do since he took office.
Obama is turning out to be exactly the kind of president he advertised himself to be at the elections. A pragmatist, a man of principle, a bi-partisan, and someone who will work tirelessly within the democratic process to get results.”
Regarding the healthcare debate, Obama ran on a platform of healthcare reform where "everything was on the table except the status quo". While stressing his personal preferences, he has recognized that bi-partisanship is important, even though the other side don't see it that way, and he's sticking to it.
So now he finds himself assailed from both sides, the right simply on principle, and the left for not taking a harder line against them.
I believe that in the long run, sticking to the principle of bi-partisanship is the way forward, even though the temptation at this stage must be very strong to abandon bi-partisanship in favor of "Bush" style executive power which circumvents the principles of democracy.
The left is criticising him for dealing directly behind closed doors with health insurance and pharma corporations, when clearly he is acting on his principles to find common ground with his opponents as he has tried to do since he took office.
Obama is turning out to be exactly the kind of president he advertised himself to be at the elections. A pragmatist, a man of principle, a bi-partisan, and someone who will work tirelessly within the democratic process to get results.”
abbyrose86 replied on Aug 13, 2009 at 15:12:37
“Great commentary. Fanned!”
dayala replied on Aug 13, 2009 at 11:58:01
“quote:
"Obama is turning out to be exactly the kind of president he advertised himself to be at the elections. A pragmatist, a man of principle, a bi-partisan, and someone who will work tirelessly within the democratic process to get results."
I remember John Edwards speeches during the campaign when he talked about the lobbyists and special interests and said 'these people are not going to give away their power and influence, it is going to have to be TAKEN AWAY fom them"
and he is right....”
"Obama is turning out to be exactly the kind of president he advertised himself to be at the elections. A pragmatist, a man of principle, a bi-partisan, and someone who will work tirelessly within the democratic process to get results."
I remember John Edwards speeches during the campaign when he talked about the lobbyists and special interests and said 'these people are not going to give away their power and influence, it is going to have to be TAKEN AWAY fom them"
and he is right....”
TruthJusticeForAll replied on Aug 13, 2009 at 11:45:39
“Yes, the man who said it was a grave mistake to not negotiate with the drug companies, who has now agreed to not negotiate with drug companies.”
New Rule: Smart President ≠ Smart Country
Commented Aug 07, 2009 at 14:48:26 in Comedy
“"We are beginning to see many things in the problem of government to which the men of the 18th century were blind. They took many things for granted that we now know need to be made the subject of the most exacting scientific study and the most careful adjustment. We learn nowadays that the under-development of universities and educational machinery is like some under-development of the brain and nerves, which hampers the whole growth of the social body. Those fathers of America thought also that they had but to leave the Press free, and all would live in the light. They did not realize that a free Press could develop a sort of constitutional venality due to its relations with advertisers, and that large newspaper proprietors could become buccaneers of opinion and insensate wreckers of good beginnings."
H. G. Wells, Outline of History, 1920”
H. G. Wells, Outline of History, 1920”
Beyond Punishment: What Really Matters About Chris Brown's Sentence
Commented Aug 05, 2009 at 23:51:46 in Entertainment
“"Abuse victims usually have their self-esteem and their sense of control slowly chipped away during their relationship with an abuser."
Why would someone want to be in a relationship with someone who lowers her self-esteem?
Isn't a relationship supposed to be about making each other happy or at least content?”
Why would someone want to be in a relationship with someone who lowers her self-esteem?
Isn't a relationship supposed to be about making each other happy or at least content?”
Beyond Punishment: What Really Matters About Chris Brown's Sentence
Commented Aug 05, 2009 at 14:58:35 in Entertainment
“Why are women attracted to violent men?
If women stopped having relationships with violent men, it seems logical to assume that men would try harder to control their violence.
No?
I'm not saying it's as black and white as that in many or even most domestic violence cases, but it sure looks that way in this one. Rihanna isn't trapped in a relationship with Brown over money or mobility. She is independently wealthy, famous and beautiful. She can have any man she wants.
So why does she go back to a violent man she knows may beat her again? Why doesn't she find someone better? A kind man? A gentle man?
It seems that for some women, the threat of violence is sexy, attractive and desirable.”
If women stopped having relationships with violent men, it seems logical to assume that men would try harder to control their violence.
No?
I'm not saying it's as black and white as that in many or even most domestic violence cases, but it sure looks that way in this one. Rihanna isn't trapped in a relationship with Brown over money or mobility. She is independently wealthy, famous and beautiful. She can have any man she wants.
So why does she go back to a violent man she knows may beat her again? Why doesn't she find someone better? A kind man? A gentle man?
It seems that for some women, the threat of violence is sexy, attractive and desirable.”
AmyCat replied on Aug 05, 2009 at 22:16:39
“Right. It's the fault of women that they're abused, 'cause they're "attracted to violent men". Blame the victim as usual, sh!t-for-brains.
And when women show common sense and shun a dangerously unbalanced guy? He takes his four handguns to a gym and starts shooting them. He says it's THEIR fault 'cause they rejected him, 'cause he couldn't get laid or find a girlfriend. Blame the Victim, AGAIN. At least THIS violent would-be abuser killed HIMSELF too and isn't going to be a repeat offender.”
And when women show common sense and shun a dangerously unbalanced guy? He takes his four handguns to a gym and starts shooting them. He says it's THEIR fault 'cause they rejected him, 'cause he couldn't get laid or find a girlfriend. Blame the Victim, AGAIN. At least THIS violent would-be abuser killed HIMSELF too and isn't going to be a repeat offender.”
cruzy replied on Aug 05, 2009 at 21:36:29
“First, you seem to have this misconception that all abusers act wild, unstable and violent from the get-go. No, it's just quite the contrary. You might meet an abusive man or woman in public and think they were a charming and delightful person. In fact, many abusers are well-educated, well-mannered (at least in public), funny, outgoing, and very likeable (until you get to know them better). Many of them do a good job of hiding their explosive side until they have a relationship firmly established, then their true nature gradually starts to creep out. Yes, there are some people who are obviously violent lugs, but that type of individual is not necessarily the typical abuser.
Second, you ignore the cylce of violence and how a victim gets sucked into it. Abuse victims usually have their self-esteem and their sense of control slowly chipped away during their relationship with an abuser. Abusers are good at isolating a victim from their friends and family and encouraging the victim to become more and more dependent solely on them. Such isolating behavior usually coincides with a gradual escalation in the level of physical and emotional abuse.
Some people may not know anything diffferent having been raised in an abusive family, but once they are shown that there is something better, there is a way to get out alive, and that not all individuals act violently, then abuse victims slowly regain (or gain for the first time) self-esteem and confidence.”
Second, you ignore the cylce of violence and how a victim gets sucked into it. Abuse victims usually have their self-esteem and their sense of control slowly chipped away during their relationship with an abuser. Abusers are good at isolating a victim from their friends and family and encouraging the victim to become more and more dependent solely on them. Such isolating behavior usually coincides with a gradual escalation in the level of physical and emotional abuse.
Some people may not know anything diffferent having been raised in an abusive family, but once they are shown that there is something better, there is a way to get out alive, and that not all individuals act violently, then abuse victims slowly regain (or gain for the first time) self-esteem and confidence.”
shadowgm replied on Aug 05, 2009 at 15:25:59
“I'm not sure that it's that simple. It's not like women go shopping for potential partners at the local UFC match.
We choose friends and partners on the basis of what they provide for us, and sometimes those are needs we don't immediately recognize. A person who is caring and helpful can easily find 'friends' who take advantage of that aspect of their nature.
It would seem self-evident to us, after the fact, that Chris Brown is a thug who deserves only scorn, and that Rihanna should have the manifest good sense to dump the loser. And while I doubt this kind of behavior just popped up out of the blue, what other criteria might be keeping the 'relationship' alive? Good sex? Musical talent? Money? Influence? The illusion of 'kindred souls'?
You suggest that Rihanna is wealthy, famous, and beautiful. She can have any man she wants - so, what is it that she wants, and what shortcomings might she find acceptable to get it?
We're very good at lying to ourselves when we're not honest about what we want.”
We choose friends and partners on the basis of what they provide for us, and sometimes those are needs we don't immediately recognize. A person who is caring and helpful can easily find 'friends' who take advantage of that aspect of their nature.
It would seem self-evident to us, after the fact, that Chris Brown is a thug who deserves only scorn, and that Rihanna should have the manifest good sense to dump the loser. And while I doubt this kind of behavior just popped up out of the blue, what other criteria might be keeping the 'relationship' alive? Good sex? Musical talent? Money? Influence? The illusion of 'kindred souls'?
You suggest that Rihanna is wealthy, famous, and beautiful. She can have any man she wants - so, what is it that she wants, and what shortcomings might she find acceptable to get it?
We're very good at lying to ourselves when we're not honest about what we want.”
JFK and the Unspeakable
Commented Jul 26, 2009 at 17:23:23 in Politics
“Oswald was not a right-winger. He was a communist. There can be little doubt about that, despite his associations with the far right. The most telling proof of that would be his choice of lawyer when he was arrested. A mob lawyer? No. A right-winger? No. His choice was John J. Abt, chief counsel to the Communist Party USA and famous for defending against the Smith Act (regarding the violent overthrow of the US government).
But you're right about the rest of it.”
But you're right about the rest of it.”
stopbush replied on Jul 28, 2009 at 16:59:33
“Actually, Oswald did not consider himself a Communist. He considered himself a Marxist and made that distinction on many occasions.”
cliffhammond replied on Jul 26, 2009 at 22:59:37
“Oswald was not a communist. That was his CIA cover. He was being sent into Cuba through Mexico but the Miami Station double crossed him using his CIA cover identity to set him up as the patsy.”
JFK and the Unspeakable
Commented Jul 26, 2009 at 16:45:34 in Politics
“No he didn't. He admitted CIA involvement with Oswald.
The important point here is who was serving who.
Was Oswald merely an asset of the CIA, or was it the other way round? Was Oswald really playing the CIA, the FBI, his anti-Castro associates and the mob for fools?
Quite clearly he was. That's why it has become a conspiracy theory. For these people to admit the truth makes them look bad, and conspiracy theorists love the idea of government agencies being all-powerful and untouchable.
Quite frankly, I believe that many of these so-called conspiracy theorists are actually doing the bidding of the CIA. It suits their purpose much better to be the kind of organization that can cause the assassination of a president or stage a terrorist attack, than be the kind of organization that is powerless to prevent one.”
The important point here is who was serving who.
Was Oswald merely an asset of the CIA, or was it the other way round? Was Oswald really playing the CIA, the FBI, his anti-Castro associates and the mob for fools?
Quite clearly he was. That's why it has become a conspiracy theory. For these people to admit the truth makes them look bad, and conspiracy theorists love the idea of government agencies being all-powerful and untouchable.
Quite frankly, I believe that many of these so-called conspiracy theorists are actually doing the bidding of the CIA. It suits their purpose much better to be the kind of organization that can cause the assassination of a president or stage a terrorist attack, than be the kind of organization that is powerless to prevent one.”
myzenthing replied on Jul 26, 2009 at 17:36:23
“You seem to be going out of your way in several posts to describe Oswald as some kind of criminal mastermind who outwitted not only the State Department, but the FBI, The CIA, the mob, The Secret Service, the anti-Castro movement and the Dallas PD.
Even a cursory examination of Oswald's life reveals that he really wasn't all that smart. He was a below-average student who never graduated high school and could barely hold a non-military job. He was short-tempered and had been diagnosed with emotional problems at a young age. Not exactly the profile of a genius criminal mastermind.”
Even a cursory examination of Oswald's life reveals that he really wasn't all that smart. He was a below-average student who never graduated high school and could barely hold a non-military job. He was short-tempered and had been diagnosed with emotional problems at a young age. Not exactly the profile of a genius criminal mastermind.”
the mean in meaningless replied on Jul 26, 2009 at 17:03:33
“It became a conspiracy theory because that's what helps people ignore the bleak truth that in America, the chances of an unstable but sufficiently functioning madman making an attempt on the life of someone like JFK is just not that extraordinary.
Blame a dark conspiracy, when in reality the truth has been out in the open all of the time: President Kennedy was assassinated by a typical American right-winger.”
Blame a dark conspiracy, when in reality the truth has been out in the open all of the time: President Kennedy was assassinated by a typical American right-winger.”
mtracy9 replied on Jul 26, 2009 at 17:03:02
“Here's part of E. Howard Hunt's confession: "As for Dave Philips, I knew him pretty well at one time. He worked for me during the Guatemala project. He made himself useful to the agency in Santiago, Chile where he was an American businessman. In any case, his actions, whatever they were, came to the attention of the Santiago station chief and when his resume became known to people in the Western Hemisphere division he was brought in to work on Guatemalan operations. [Frank] Sturgis and [David] Morales and people of that ilk, stayed in apartment houses during preparations for the big event. Their addresses were very subject to change so that where a fellow like Morales had been one day, you'd not necessarily associated with that address the following day. In short it was a very mobile experience."”
JFK and the Unspeakable
Commented Jul 26, 2009 at 16:09:58 in Politics
“That's what happened to Oswald.
Oswald won Jack Ruby's confidence. Ruby introduced Oswald to the mob. Ruby Vouched for Oswald.
Oswald, of course, was playing them all for suckers. That's because Oswald was no ordinary man. Any study of his history or his friends and associates can tell you that. Oswald was a chameleon. He was who he wanted you to think he was. A patriot, a gangster, a communist, an anti-communist, a spy, or a patsy.
Ruby's bosses gave Ruby a choice - die or kill Oswald, keep his mouth shut and go to jail. Ruby did what he had to.
It's hilarious that conspiracy theorists are so quick to defend the competence of the incompetent. They fail to understand that capable men driven by ideology like Oswald or Osama Bin Laden can easily outwit those driven by a paycheck. The CIA isn't staffed by superheroes, it's staffed by drones taking orders from unimaginative political shills. Always has been.
Oswald was eventually captured by pure luck, Bin Laden still evades capture. Why? Because he's smarter than the people going after him.”
Oswald won Jack Ruby's confidence. Ruby introduced Oswald to the mob. Ruby Vouched for Oswald.
Oswald, of course, was playing them all for suckers. That's because Oswald was no ordinary man. Any study of his history or his friends and associates can tell you that. Oswald was a chameleon. He was who he wanted you to think he was. A patriot, a gangster, a communist, an anti-communist, a spy, or a patsy.
Ruby's bosses gave Ruby a choice - die or kill Oswald, keep his mouth shut and go to jail. Ruby did what he had to.
It's hilarious that conspiracy theorists are so quick to defend the competence of the incompetent. They fail to understand that capable men driven by ideology like Oswald or Osama Bin Laden can easily outwit those driven by a paycheck. The CIA isn't staffed by superheroes, it's staffed by drones taking orders from unimaginative political shills. Always has been.
Oswald was eventually captured by pure luck, Bin Laden still evades capture. Why? Because he's smarter than the people going after him.”
stopbush replied on Jul 28, 2009 at 16:30:59
“Oswald captured by pure luck?
An APB was issued for him in the JFK killing as soon as the employee headcount was completed at the TSBD and the cops realized that LHO was the ONLY employee missing from the building.
4 eyewitnesses saw LHO kill JD Tippet, and 6 other saw him walking away from the scene (they didn't witness the actual shooting). His physical description was reported and issued immediately, including the jacket he had changed into when he went to his rental room to retrieve his handgun. His movements after he killed Tippet were noticed and reported by shop keepers and pedestrians alike. The noose around him closed quickly. Witnesses who saw him enter the Texas Theater immediately told police he was there. An angry mob had formed outside the theater by the time Oswald was captured and taken to a police car.
Even if the guy who killed Tippet hadn't turned out to be LHO, the police would have still been out looking for Oswald as the killer of JFK. By the time that had interviewed people associated with Oswald, they would have been looking for him as THE prime suspect in the JFK murder.”
An APB was issued for him in the JFK killing as soon as the employee headcount was completed at the TSBD and the cops realized that LHO was the ONLY employee missing from the building.
4 eyewitnesses saw LHO kill JD Tippet, and 6 other saw him walking away from the scene (they didn't witness the actual shooting). His physical description was reported and issued immediately, including the jacket he had changed into when he went to his rental room to retrieve his handgun. His movements after he killed Tippet were noticed and reported by shop keepers and pedestrians alike. The noose around him closed quickly. Witnesses who saw him enter the Texas Theater immediately told police he was there. An angry mob had formed outside the theater by the time Oswald was captured and taken to a police car.
Even if the guy who killed Tippet hadn't turned out to be LHO, the police would have still been out looking for Oswald as the killer of JFK. By the time that had interviewed people associated with Oswald, they would have been looking for him as THE prime suspect in the JFK murder.”
cliffhammond replied on Jul 27, 2009 at 00:12:37
“Beg to disagree. Officer Tibbits' job was to kill the patsy (Oswald) but he failed. Oswald was on his way to meet with his CIA handler at the Texas Theater. He was expecting to receive operational support before his infiltration into Cuba via Mexico. Of course, the police were informed where he was (Dallas PD was infested with people on the mafia payrolls). You are right that Ruby was the responsible party and had to meet his guarantees by completing the job himself. Oswald was double crossed by the Miami Station handlers. CIA does not take orders from "unimaginative political shills." The Miami Station went totally rogue on JFK.”
JFK and the Unspeakable
Commented Jul 26, 2009 at 14:25:11 in Politics
“Behind every 'glaring outpoint' you will find an official in government or law enforcement who messed up and buried evidence to try to save his job.
That's what it always comes down to. Always.”
That's what it always comes down to. Always.”
JFK and the Unspeakable
Commented Jul 26, 2009 at 12:28:55 in Politics
“Behind every great conspiracy theory there lies a great incompetence and a cover up of that incompetence.
Everyone who came into contact with Oswald, except maybe his wife, underestimated him entirely. He was able to play everyone he met and convince them of what he wanted them to believe. His politics were either far left or far right depending on who he was trying to cosy up to at the time. He was as accomplished in this regard as any spy or double agent, but his agenda was always all his own. He wanted to be somebody. He wanted to be a revolutionary hero.
He successfully confused the FBI agent who was supposed to be keeping an eye on him, James Hosty. Hosty fairly recently admitted that he had buried evidence of his incompetence in handling Oswald. This evidence completely unmasks Oswald's true intentions. Oswald tricked Hosty into believing that the threat to JFK was coming from right wingers and gangsters. Oswald hoped to kill JFK, pin it on his mobster "friends" and escape to Cuba. When the mobsters he had tricked realized this, they had Oswald killed.
Really, I'd like to see a JFK movie that tells this story properly. The reality is far more fascinating than the conspiracy myth.”
Everyone who came into contact with Oswald, except maybe his wife, underestimated him entirely. He was able to play everyone he met and convince them of what he wanted them to believe. His politics were either far left or far right depending on who he was trying to cosy up to at the time. He was as accomplished in this regard as any spy or double agent, but his agenda was always all his own. He wanted to be somebody. He wanted to be a revolutionary hero.
He successfully confused the FBI agent who was supposed to be keeping an eye on him, James Hosty. Hosty fairly recently admitted that he had buried evidence of his incompetence in handling Oswald. This evidence completely unmasks Oswald's true intentions. Oswald tricked Hosty into believing that the threat to JFK was coming from right wingers and gangsters. Oswald hoped to kill JFK, pin it on his mobster "friends" and escape to Cuba. When the mobsters he had tricked realized this, they had Oswald killed.
Really, I'd like to see a JFK movie that tells this story properly. The reality is far more fascinating than the conspiracy myth.”
laocoon replied on Jul 27, 2009 at 12:49:05
“I dont think there are any conclusions that can be 100% but the one conclusion I think is 99% is that Oswald expected help in getting away.”
Nommo replied on Jul 26, 2009 at 16:10:02
“Special? I'll say.”
Shattering The Meat Myth: Humans Are Natural Vegetarians
Commented Jun 13, 2009 at 21:26:38 in Living
“I'm a vegetarian and I feel practically violated by this article. There's no difference to this than listening to a Republican talking about evolution or climate change or the merits of a universal healthcare system. It's all ideology and outright distortion.”
When Will Dick Cheney's Tower of Lies Finally Come Tumbling Down on Him?
Commented Jun 03, 2009 at 00:33:20 in Politics
“Before Bush and Cheney die, there must be a truth commission. But not right now.”
Why We Need Bristol (and Levi)
Commented May 08, 2009 at 14:18:18 in Politics
“I don't think Bristol Palin is a good spokesperson for an anti-teenage pregnancy campaign because, basically, she and her baby are going to have a great life. They've got a well-knit, affluent family to support them.
The truth is that for some teenagers, especially those with the right family support network, getting pregnant is not such a bad idea. A fifteen year old in my extended family recently had a baby through an unplanned pregnancy, and it has made everyone very happy. It's snapped them out of their humdrum lives and given everyone something to do!
I think that if you're going to choose a spokesperson for anti-teenage pregnancy, it should be someone for whom pregnancy ruined her life. More to the point, ruined HIS life.
Levi, is far the better choice on this issue IMO.”
The truth is that for some teenagers, especially those with the right family support network, getting pregnant is not such a bad idea. A fifteen year old in my extended family recently had a baby through an unplanned pregnancy, and it has made everyone very happy. It's snapped them out of their humdrum lives and given everyone something to do!
I think that if you're going to choose a spokesperson for anti-teenage pregnancy, it should be someone for whom pregnancy ruined her life. More to the point, ruined HIS life.
Levi, is far the better choice on this issue IMO.”
dinglebe replied on May 08, 2009 at 15:03:13
“This is the sort of drivel I would expect to hear from someone from Appalachia.”
naturallight replied on May 08, 2009 at 14:55:38
“let us face facts. If it weren't for teen pregnancy over half of us would not be here. I don't mean my mom. I mean 1700-1800's with a lifespan of 50 years. Did people breed at 35-45 like they try to these days? the war against nature should surrender.”
MsMandy replied on May 08, 2009 at 14:40:20
“"Given them something to do"?! Babies are not a hobby, they are people who need guidance and care for far more than just the cute-little-baby years.”
Ann Coulter Insults Me and Hundreds of Combat Veterans
Commented May 04, 2009 at 11:45:40 in Media
“"For the record, there were three Air Force interrogators who played a key role in the killing of Zarqawi..."
Must've used some pretty harsh techniques.
My bad.”
Must've used some pretty harsh techniques.
My bad.”
Obama's First 100 Days Report Card: HuffPost Bloggers Give Their Grades
Commented Apr 29, 2009 at 12:58:20 in Politics
“Considering that Obama has had to devote so much of his time to fixing the mess left by the previous administration I give him an A+. It's hard to imagine a better president. He has vision, imagination, and he understands what ordinary people expect the government to do.
I take issue with all those who find fault with Obama's treatment of the financial institutions who in an ideal world would have been allowed to fail. The choice was between a recession or a depression. Obama did what he had to do to avoid a depression. That meant bailing out banks and rewarding failure. Unfortunately he had little choice. Maybe nationalization would have been a better option, but politically it would have given the right something to unite against. I prefer the right as they are, fragmented and weak.
Regarding torture, I think critics on the left are too quick to ignore just how important it was that Obama released the torture memos in the first place - would Hilary have done it? Obama's message is clear, that torture is wrong. Bush and Cheney will be held to account soon enough, but there's no need to rush things. They're not going anywhere.
Overall, Obama has lived up to my expectations and exceeded them. The right president at the right time. At last.”
I take issue with all those who find fault with Obama's treatment of the financial institutions who in an ideal world would have been allowed to fail. The choice was between a recession or a depression. Obama did what he had to do to avoid a depression. That meant bailing out banks and rewarding failure. Unfortunately he had little choice. Maybe nationalization would have been a better option, but politically it would have given the right something to unite against. I prefer the right as they are, fragmented and weak.
Regarding torture, I think critics on the left are too quick to ignore just how important it was that Obama released the torture memos in the first place - would Hilary have done it? Obama's message is clear, that torture is wrong. Bush and Cheney will be held to account soon enough, but there's no need to rush things. They're not going anywhere.
Overall, Obama has lived up to my expectations and exceeded them. The right president at the right time. At last.”


