“It's hard to send you a link for this statement you claim originated from NASA. As there are zero examples. Other than some conspiracy websites. But it would seem reasonable if the source had been NASA, they would talk about that somewhere on their site, or anywhere else on the Internet for that sake. If you want me to post the failed attempts at some fact finding behind your claim, I could. But it is kind of nonsensical when chatting with a non factual person.”
“Divide obviously must mean to peel off those that merely follow and are easily swayed. As opposed to those that research their opinions, and their candidates. Yes, I believe either one, Obama, or Warren is doing that. And it pretty much leaves the followers exposed, and nowhere to go.”
“And you give a link to a non NASA site. Please. And then go on to claim, Forget it. It's hard to correct a dreamer that believes anything on the internet. My Point is we have been accurate enough to build the society we have, but that's all happenstance. Sure, right, whatever you want to blather.”
“Actually, it was the Church that demanded the Earth was flat. What Scientist in the 60's said we would be covered in ice because of pollution. And NASA didn't predict any such thing as there would be no ice. There is something funny with the statements, as a Google Search could not uncover a single one as being true. The Ice thing, was an Al Gore prediction based on, that days level of research.”
“A very good reason for Democrats in TX to double down just like their Right Wing Brothers. TX hasn't always been how it is, it was once a respectable place to live in peace with your neighbors. It can be again. But don't forget to VOTE!!!!”
“CNN is the entire country? I would differ with that. Some don't watch TV News for any reason other than Local. And then to get all worked up, hardly. Agenda as I said. This someone makes a living from being a personality posing as a professional. No Professional would offer opinion publicly without an interview. Please try to stay grounded.”
“I think you meant Fox News Experts. And mistakenly put contributors in place. Because we all know it takes some skill and experience to be a McDonalds Chef, working at below your pay scale. And Fox would need to muster their best, "their Experts", because their contributors wouldn't qualify to work as the WalMart Greeter, without careful supervision.”
“Agenda? What rock are you under? Of course FOX News has an agenda, putting this "TV Personality" on a show about a serious tragedy spouting Nonprofessional Opinion. It's just the Followers that do not think for themselves eat all of that as if it's actual fact, in this case Medical Diagnostic Opinion. Which I guess in this case would also be Illegal to spout about because It's Private.”
GoldwaterKid on May 26, 2014 at 11:50:28
“OMG. Have you not watched CNN yet? The entire country is trying to figure out step by step what in the world was going on with this kid.
And why is someone working through their identity from any angle a NO, NO to discuss is interesting in it's self.”
“Sorry, I had no idea you could be serious. You would first have to define Static. Have you looked at any of the charts included in the IPCC report?
I think this would be a very good starting point. http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/index.shtml”
“I know the answer. My cousin died at 30, good looking corpse. My buddy died at 23, could have been a good looking corpse. I am glad I am going to sag a bit, and embrace the process. Because those folks that we once close, will never sag.”
dancinggrandma on May 24, 2014 at 08:20:02
“I'm right at the age in which all of this is beginning to happen and too close to the age where it will. If I viewed the same images at 50 or 60, I doubt my reaction would be the same, sir. Also, although it shouldn't be the case, it is different for women. All of our lives, we've been taught that our physical attractiveness is far too important. Myself, I'd rather not live past 85 - and this age isn't far away from my own.”
“The IPCC report isn't hard to interpret. Why not just download the entire document, and actually make your own mind up. I mean it's a couple of days read for a normal reader. Give or take with your ability of commitment to read. It's eye opening.
“I wonder why the folks that like their guns, don't jump up and take the stage against these fools? The guys LOVE their guns. Normal People Love each other, not their Weaponry. These examples are weekly now, and are great to keep in our sights. Why are we at odds with people that like to target shoot, practice shoot, skeet, hunt, or just plunk? Those of us, that are not gun owners, and don't want the Nutzo's to intimidate us, why aren't we arm and arm with those that are responsible and sane humans, that also enjoy firearms? Why should we be at odds? I am a very Liberal minded Tradesman of 39 years, and I don't want to take anyone's gun. With the caveat they are sane enough to know the difference between a squirrel and a Democrat. We all, Gun enthusiasts and non gun user's, need to stand tall against the push to bring back the 1880's.”
William1950 on May 24, 2014 at 00:54:26
“you want em to know the difference between a squirrel and a democrat... you're asking a lot... :)”