- BIG NEWS:
- Terrorism
- |
- Barack Obama
- |
- Blackwater
- |
- Health Care
- |
Right-wing buffoon Rush Limbaugh takes a swipe at Iraq veterans who oppose the war... who can defend themselves quite nicely, if they even feel inclined to respond to this kind of schoolyard boy-baiting.
Democrat flaks jump on this like ducks on a June-bug, and in the process themselves reproduce the sick militarism of this culture that automatically valorizes anyone who wears a uniform. How dare you insult a soldier! Like its some sacred calling instead of an imperial employment program steeped in the culture of machismo and misogyny. (And you can gasp as theatrically as you want... I spent more than two decades wearing a uniform... that is exactly what it is.)
How is it that a pill-popping nitwit like Limbaugh can be the punching bag for these ritual displays of opportunistic nationalism, and there is no outrage from the same quarters about the fact that the Democratic majority in Congress now has it within its collective power to stop this war right goddamn now... and refuses to do so?
The Washington Post released a poll today, conspicuously absent from this site, showing that four out of five Democrats in the US want the war defunded -- defunding the war is an action that is not vulnerable to a Presidential veto, so that bogus little hidey-hole just closed -- yet Democratic members of Congress are deaf to their constituents (holding their hands over their ears is more accurate).
This is exactly the reason we have to take all the risks attendant in 2008 of allowing this edifice of perfidy and political irrelevance to crumble.
Any Democrat who votes to give another dime to this bloody, cynical criminal enterprise in Iraq should automatically be handed a defeat by people of conscience who have voted for them in the past... by withholding that vote. Until we exercise this one power we have right now, we will be subordinated to the good cop - bad cop system of Democrat versus Republican.
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
Did you see Rahm Emanuel on Real Time? Bill Maher tried to get him to explain why congress won't defund the occupation (they called it "war"). Emanuel insisted we had to send resources to "the troops." He refused to explain the logic of prolonging the occupation by continuing to fund it. It was so intellectually dishonest that I thought he must be a republican.
But don't criticize those demanding Rush be called to account for what he said. They're doing so specifically because of the MoveOn censure, forcing him and his apologists to defend their hypocrisy. They made political hay out of the Petraeus ad, so it would be foolish to let Limbaugh slide.
Over and over again, it is their hypocrisy that is the most astounding. Throw it in their faces.
Mr. Goff, that was quite possibly the best post I have read yet on Huffington. Thank you.
FLUSH 08
re.
ain't it a coincidence thay are ALWAYS gonna REALLY fight the War at a date 3 or 4 months in the future.
ngress
The flush of incumbants isn't just for Republicans .....anymo
Either you start fighting with EVERY tool possible to End the Iraq War...or don't ask for a damn dime or vote. I just heard tonight democrats are talking about REALLY fighting against the war in January...
YOUR FUTURE IS NOW.....Co
America is getting the HELL out of Iraq
with or without YOU
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or connect with