By Stanley Weiss and Tim Heinemann
WASHINGTON -- Both political parties should be ashamed.
Through the last three debates, we Americans have listened to such bumper sticker one-liners as "GM is alive and bin Ladin is dead" and "I know how to run a business." We have heard new slants on old themes, more accusations and counter-accusations, verbal whiteouts of statistics, formulas and gotchas, and studied political-consultant rhetoric certified to make the speaker sound "presidential." It is a no-brainer to assert: "I was the one who decided to go after bin Ladin," as if any American would not have made the same decision. Doesn't real presidential leadership require focusing on the toughest issues, where Americans are at the greatest risk?
One of us has spent most of the past decade working on counter-terrorism for the Defense Department. The other has been deeply engaged in both international business and global security issues at the highest levels. Each has met and talked frankly with both senior and mid-level government representatives from over one hundred nations. Again and again we have heard the same lament. When asked what is the Number One threat to their national security, an unnerving number have replied, "China." Some will say this publicly. Many will only admit it in private, explaining that their countries are becoming more and more dependent on China.
Their unanimous reason is that China creates economic dependencies, monopolizes markets, destroys local competition and drives off local labor. In country after country, we have heard that China uses its financial power to corrupt government officials, shape politics, buy off intelligence officials, secure strategic terrain (such as the Panama Canal and Myanmar's direct seaport access to the Indian Ocean) and then intimidate other nations, as it is presently doing with Japan, the Philippines and Vietnam in disputes over islands in Asian rim waters.
Meanwhile, back home, both parties and candidates have danced around this, the biggest national security and economic security challenge of our time. Governor Romney's assertion that "If China cheats" we will punish them or call them to accountability misses the mark just as widely as President Obama's cool aloofness, not mentioning China at all.
Here is the simple -- and simply ignored -- fact that has emerged from our separate global conversations: China is waging a full-scale war "by other means" against the United States. While our candidates fiddle with one-liners and argue statistics, the Chinese proceed at, to use military jargon, flank speed and on plan, with potentially devastating consequences on a global scale.
It is a delicate dance to poke at the nation to which we owe trillions, but that is exactly what those who claim to be presidential must do. Candidates for the highest office in the land now skirt around compelling China-related issues at our collective peril.
To be sure, bringing jobs back to America is something both candidates and all Americans agree on. But the China challenge is not just about "jobs and the economy," though these two concerns hit home hard in tough times. Even more, it is about how a centrally coordinated authoritarian regime encroaches, monopolizes, dominates, intimidates and steals much more than intellectual property, patents and American jobs. In increments it steals our safety and independence.
This coming Monday night it would be both refreshing and responsible for both candidates to square off, not against each other, but as Americans together facing China on the issues of jobs, economy, dependencies, monopolies, espionage, intellectual property theft, aggressive cyber warfare and "war by other means." Bin Ladin is dead and so, unfortunately, is our Ambassador to Libya. China and its aggressive agenda are, however, very much alive and posing significant threats to our national security, our prosperity and our freedom.
How about some equal time next week on this?
Stanley Weiss is the former chairman of American Premier, Inc. (an international mining, refractories, chemicals and mineral processing company) and founding chairman of Business Executives for National Security (a non-partisan organization of senior executives who contribute their expertise in the best practices of business to strengthening the nation's security). This article is a personal comment.
Tim Heinemann is a retired Special Forces officer and a mobile training team leader for counter-terrorism professional development of American allies around the world for U.S. Department of Defense.
"It is a delicate dance to poke at the nation to which we owe trillions..."
Why?
Global climate change is indeed our number 1 priority if we are to survive as a species. I also suspect we have reached the "point of no return" quite some time ago.
When I went to high school and college in the early and mid 1970's, we were already discussing climate change tho many of us thought we were facing climate "cooling" instead of "warming".
I have 3 grown up daughters and will become a grandfather for the 1rst time. I feel deeply ashamed for my generation's failure to protect our environment and our embrace of materialism, consumerism and wholesale indifference to global warming. I took early retirement 2 years ago so my contribution to provide a better society for my children is limited
I have failed miserably as a father and as a progressive human being. Mea Maxima Culpa.
I do think you are being pretty hard on yourself as you are one person living in a large society, who is a human animal. And that means fallible. I think the only hope for real change comes with the societal shift of mentality. It may start at an individual level, but the shift has to reach a high enough percentage of the population to 'take over'.
We are animals, so we're subject to animal instincts. I may be mixing up my studies here (and I apologize if so) but do you remember the monkeys in Japan who bathe in the hot springs? It started with one money, then that one taught a few others, then they taught some. And then suddenly the number of monkeys doing it leaped to ALL of them. I have a suspicion I've got the behavior part wrong, it may have been a matter of washing their hands, the message is the same either way. If enough people adopt the change, at some point there will be a cultural shift.
The US does not support dictatorships unless they have oil or naval basis' such as Saudi-Arabia or Bahrain or Qatar or UAE which are all old fashioned despotic monarchies. Pro American doctatorships can always count on American goodwill. The list is endless. Let the China hating Jihadists reintroduce the "Chinese Exclusion Act"! Suspicious looking Chinese should be tagged or sent to the ever-expanding incarceration Industry. In the 1930's another frustrated nation blamed it's economic woes on a specific ethnic group."L'histoire se repete!
The Americans are patriotic. The Chinese are ultranationalistic. Vive la difference!