iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Stanley Weiss

GET UPDATES FROM Stanley Weiss
 

Israel's Future: When It's Jew Versus Jew

Posted: 06/15/2012 5:00 pm

It's a measure of Nazi effectiveness in destroying the centers of Jewish learning that when Israel was created in 1948, there were just 400 ultra-Orthodox Jewish men in the entire state. Aware of the desire to revive Jewish religious study after the Holocaust, Israel's first prime minister, David Ben-Gurion, cut a deal: Haredi Jews, as the ultra-Orthodox are known, could spend all their time studying the Torah. They wouldn't have to serve in the military like other Israelis, and they wouldn't have to work -- the state would support them. Like most Jews, the prime minister believed the deal would be short-lived: he assumed that Haredi students weren't long for the modern world.

The Haredim didn't have much use for Israel, either. First imagined by the non-religious Jewish visionary Theodor Herzl as a secular, democratic society where rabbis had "no privileged voice in the state" (in what would become known as Zionism), Israel was viewed by many Haredi Jews as an abomination. The only true state of Israel, they believed, would be established by the coming of the Messiah. When the armistice that established the state's borders in 1949 failed to include either the biblical land of Judea and Samaria (home to Jewish patriarchs and matriarchs) or the Old City of Jerusalem (that houses the Western Wall, Judaism's most significant religious site) -- many Haredi rabbis wept.

But 45 years ago this month, when Israel regained Judea and Samaria (known to most as the West Bank) along with the Western Wall in the Six-Day War between Israel, Egypt, Jordan and Syria, Haredi Jews saw an opportunity to infuse Zionism with Judaism. In the process, they have launched a public cultural war in Israel -- a battle that Israeli President Shimon Peres calls "a fight for the soul of the nation."

While many Western movies like to depict Israeli Jews as wearing long beards and broad-brimmed caps (or as tough-guy Mossad agents), Haredi Jews make up a minority of Israel's population. Most other Israeli Jews observe their faith while engaging society -- studying the Torah while also working full-time or sending their children to serve in the army after studying at religious schools. But there is no precedent in Jewish history or holy texts for entire families to get paid to study the Torah while living apart from society. Far from dying out, as Ben-Gurion believed, the population is growing.

With birthrates three times higher than the Israeli average, Haredi Jews have doubled their population since 1990. By 2028, Haredi Jews are expected to account for 1 in 3 Jewish children under the age of 14. If trends continue, they will combine with Israeli-Arab children to make up 78 percent of all pupils in Israel's schools by mid-century -- making Israeli Jews, protectors of the Zionist dream, a small minority.

This creates three serious problems for Israel's future as a secular democracy.

First, while their numbers grow, the deal the Haredim struck with Ben-Gurion still holds. While 400 were exempted from military service at Israel's founding, by 2010, that number had grown to more than 60,000. Meanwhile, more than 60 percentof Haredi men don't work, depending fully on state welfare payments to feed families that average eight children. The total rejection of modernity by Haredi Jews also mean that few students graduate with basic skills like math or English necessary to succeed in today's work world . Where, many wonder, will Israel find the doctors, engineers -- or soldiers -- of the future when 1 in 3 men refuse to work or serve ? As Dan Ben-David, Executive Director of the Taub Center for Social Policy Studies in Israel, has observed, "In 20 years, there is a risk we will have a third-world population here which can't sustain a first-world economy and army."

Second, while the number of illegal settlers in the occupied West Bank has grown from 12,000 Jews in 1980 to more than 300,000 today, religious Jews have led the charge, accounting for 80 percent of the settler population -- with Haredim comprising an ever-increasing percentage. To them, this is not occupied territory, stolen by Israel from Palestinians in the 1967 war -- as much of the international community, including the United States, believes. This land is at the very core of Israel's biblical identity -- the land where Jewish patriarchs Abraham, Isaac and Jacob lived, where Joshua declared the Jewish nation after 400 years of slavery.

With the West Bank at the heart of any future Palestinian state, Israel continues to face the difficult choice of enticing settlers to leave, forcing them to leave, or simply abandoning those who refuse to leave to life under Palestinian rule. It's difficult to imagine Haredi Jews leaving under any circumstance.

Third, to most Israeli Jews, the real problem, as an American rabbi puts it, is that "the future they would create looks more like Islamist Iran than any Jewish culture that I or you... would want to be part of." The list of what's been called "aggressive medievalism" perpetrated by Haredi Jews is long and quickly growing. In December, Haredi men spit on an eight year-old girl whom they judged to be immodestly dressed while walking to school. In Jerusalem, outraged women have been forced by some Haredim to sit in the back of the bus. Meanwhile, the chief rabbi of the air force stepped down because the army refused to excuse Haredi soldiers from attending events where female singers perform. Many worry about what this extremist minority is doing to the state, and ask: what happens when ultra-religious Jews are the state?

Meanwhile, resentment among other Jews -- who withstand the insults, pay the welfare stipends and serve in the military -- continues to deepen. In 2006, a third of Israelis identified Haredi Jews as the state's most hated group. Where will this go?

A strong signal will be sent this summer. In February, Israel's Supreme Court ruled that the decades-old draft exemption, known as the Tal Law, was illegal. A wide majority of Israeli Jews believe Haredim should serve in the military. By July 31st, the governing coalition led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu must come up with a new solution. A commission is expected to draft a compromise. The Haredim are already threatening to choose prison over military service.

The world has grown accustomed to Jews fighting Arabs -- but what to do when the greatest threat to Israel's future is Jews fighting Jews? If the Zionist dream is going to survive, Modern-Orthodox, Conservative and Reform Jews must be heard. They will never have more leverage than they do right now. By the end of July, we'll know if Herzl's dream still has a fighting chance.

The author is Founding Chairman of Business Executives for National Security, a nonpartisan organization based in Washington, D.C. This is a personal comment.

 
FOLLOW WORLD
It's a measure of Nazi effectiveness in destroying the centers of Jewish learning that when Israel was created in 1948, there were just 400 ultra-Orthodox Jewish men in the entire state. Aware of the...
It's a measure of Nazi effectiveness in destroying the centers of Jewish learning that when Israel was created in 1948, there were just 400 ultra-Orthodox Jewish men in the entire state. Aware of the...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 272
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andre De Angelis
03:58 AM on 06/20/2012
>> Gaza started attacking again the same DAY as the withdrawal.

False. There were no rocket attacks until May 2006.

>>Also, look at this page, you're making a mess.

...of your talking points
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andre De Angelis
03:50 AM on 06/20/2012
There were no rockets fired into Israel for 4 months before Castlead took place!

>>Israel evaluates every war including Castlead to see how they can reduce non combatant casualties.

False:

As Mordecai Gur(Israeli politician and the 10th Chief of Staff of the IDF) said:

"The Israeli army has always struck civilian populations, purposely and consciously. The army has never distinguished civilian from military targets, but has purposely attacked civilian targets."

The funny thing is that Israel argued that the legal definition of war crimes should be changed to suit modern warfare after denying they committed war crimes during Cast Lead.

The IDF uses children as human shields (another war crime), and
challenged an Israeli high court ban against the use of human shields.

>>The claim 'view every civilian as 'partly' enemy combatant", is patently false

It's the basis of the Dahyia doctrine.

>>. Hamas' admitted that half those the died in Cast lead were combatants

Rubbish. They admitted that half were members of Hamas, which included the 250 police cadets murdered in the first day.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andre De Angelis
04:39 PM on 06/19/2012
>> Palestine was a place, not a country.

The Balfour Declaration refers to it as a country
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andre De Angelis
04:37 PM on 06/19/2012
>> from my enemies.

Who are your enemies because you stole their land.
02:22 AM on 06/20/2012
They were our enemies long before that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andre De Angelis
03:48 AM on 06/19/2012
>> Can you please tell me who was the higher contracting power of the West Bank before Israeli re-occupation of that land?

The ICJ noted the non-renunciation provisions contained in the 4th Geneva Convention and the fact that when the occupation began in 1967, that both Israel and Jordan were High Contracting Parties. See paras 75-78 and 91-101 of the Wall advisory opinion http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/131/1671.pdf
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andre De Angelis
03:23 AM on 06/19/2012
>> Definition of quiet-Gaza: Between 2001 and January 2009, over 8,600 rockets had been launched.

Definition of peaceful unilateral withdrawal: Between Sept 2005 and June 2006, over 7,700 shells had been launched into Gaza by Israel.
02:18 AM on 06/20/2012
What do you expect? Gaza started attacking again the same DAY as the withdrawal. If they agreed to leave us alone, we'd leave them alone.

By the way, if you respond to the message rather than in a new thread, the one who wrote it may get a notification. Also, look at this page, you're making a mess.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andre De Angelis
03:19 AM on 06/19/2012
>> Palestinian Arabs when given the choice between living in a new Palestinian State or Israel prefer Israel etc etc etc ...

It's because it's their home. Most Iranian Jews prefer to live in Iran for the same reason m
02:20 AM on 06/20/2012
Or because Palestine has little to offer them except suffering and not having Jews.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andre De Angelis
03:16 AM on 06/19/2012
>> and Haarets is no important Israeli paper... he is number 6 or 7 from the daily's

Fox News is the highest rating news channel, but that doesn't make it credible.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andre De Angelis
03:12 AM on 06/19/2012
>>Falsely painting the Palestinians as innocent victims has convinced them they are so.

They're not the ones doing the ethnic cleansing, home demolition and occupation.

>> It is one of the reasons they have shown little success at anything but violence and rage.

Destruction of their society, economy and culture might also have something to do with it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andre De Angelis
03:06 AM on 06/19/2012
Not even Israel's Supreme Court made disputes this.

>> 242 the only legal resolution asks for negotiations on borders and a peace agreement, hence the term disputed.

Rubbish. The preamble stated clearly that all land occupied in the 1967 war is I admissible. The negotiations only apply to minor modifications of the borders, but requires Israel to first withdraw.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andre De Angelis
03:06 AM on 06/19/2012
>> various countries and organizations call it "disputed".

No one but Israel calls it disputed.

>> But the meer opinions of a few leaders of various countries does not mean they are right.

All 15 members of the UNSC and all 15 justices verses 1.

Judea and Samara was never part of Israel. It certainly is not Israel's under any interpretation of international law.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andre De Angelis
02:59 AM on 06/19/2012
>> the military strike was on a tunnel that was being dug from Gaza into Israel. There is no way the tunnel could have been used for anything other than an attack on Israel

Rubbish. Gaza smuggled goods into Gaza from Israel.

No one bought Israel's BS claim.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andre De Angelis
02:57 AM on 06/19/2012
>> Please provide evidence that Israel measures success of a mission without regard to how many civilians are killed

"The Israeli army has always struck civilian populations, purposely and consciously. The army has never distinguished civilian from military targets, but has purposely attacked civilian targets."
Mordecai Gur(Israeli politician and the 10th Chief of Staff of the IDF)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andre De Angelis
02:49 AM on 06/19/2012
>> israel is socialist, gaza's a theorcracy. there's a clear difference.

Israel is an apartheid ethnocracy.
02:25 AM on 06/20/2012
The law gives more rights to the ethnic group we supposedly oppress.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andre De Angelis
02:48 AM on 06/19/2012
>> The British Mandate was created as a guideline for the British to create a Jewish Homeland based off its historical borders.

Rubbish. There were no historical borders mentioned and Balfour explicitly stated that these were not to include Transjordan.

>> By law today, Israel encompasses all that land stated above.

Rubbish. The only law that applies is based on UNGA181. San Remo assigned control to Britsin and Britain passed control to the UN.