Starre Vartan

Starre Vartan

Posted February 26, 2009 | 02:27 PM (EST)

WWGD? (What Would Greenies Drive?): The Ultimate Green Car

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

2009-02-26-greencar.jpg

These days, almost every auto company promotes the greenness of its fleet one way or another.  Some tout their clean emissions , others high miles per gallon, and a few even mention the recyclability of their vehicles.  And while there is truth to some of these ads, some border on greenwash.  Using Greenopia's research expertise and background (including their automaker ratings), I've (along with Greenopia's Master of Environmental Ratings, Doug Mazeffa) come up with the Ultimate Green Car (UGC) using existing technologies. 

Fuel Type:

Without a doubt our car would be an electric vehicle, like the Chevy Volt or the Tesla Roadster.  Since energy is pulled off the grid and stored in your vehicle there is no energy loss from hydrogen, gasoline, natural gas, or biofuel conversion (all of which have controversial, non-eco problems with them, and except for gas, lack of distribution stations). Even if electric power comes from a dirty coal or fuel-burning plant, it's still more efficient (and significantly less polluting) than burning fuel in an internal combustion engine. Electric-only cars have no tailpipe emissions.  Since even new cars release 5-15 tons of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere each year (according to the EPA), an emissions-free vehicle would lead to considerable carbon footprint reduction.

Caveat: Sure, there may be a one-time added environmental cost of producing the battery for our electric car, but years of driving the car would easily offset it.  After all, the vast majority of the vehicle’s impact is from driving.

Bonus: extra points to drivers who make renewable energy in their own homes (think a backyard wind turbine, roof covered with solar panels, hyper-efficient small hydro, geothermal, or, most realistic, a combination of the above).

Body Material:
Nobody thinks much about what a car is made of (until you're in an accident, or if you actually build cars), but the tons of material that make up a typical car have a big impact. According to a Life Cycle Analysis by researchers at the University of Kentucky, aluminum has a lower lifetime impact than steel. Even though it takes more energy to refine aluminum, it is lighter (so better mileage and lower emissions).  Thus we would incorporate as much aluminum (recycled if possible) as we could in the body of the vehicle while still maintaining the cars’ body integrity for safety.  We would also incorporate LED headlights, recycled glass, and no-VOC paints. 

Bonus: Go the route of the Delorean and do away with exterior paint altogether (or at least make it an option). Maybe the green cars of the future will show off their underlying materials and they will all be unique shades of black, grey and creams. As we know from Prius, standing out gets you noticed.

Interior:

Sorry Rolls-Royce owners, you won’t see any rare hardwoods in our car.  Our seats would be made from hemp and trimmed with hemp-silk mixes (easy-to-grow, supertough, soft, and can even be made with a cool, nubby sheen) and padded with sustainable materials (recycled denim, Kenaf, or soy-based foam, like Lexus has).  The dash would be made from bioplastics (which looks the same as regular plastics) and gauges would be lit by LEDs.  Also, everyone knows the distinct smell of a new car, which is actually toxic VOC's offgassing. None of that in the UGC; all interior items will be treated with non-toxic and biodegradable cleaning products and so it will smell like your fave essential oil (should you choose to scent it) or fresh air.

Bonus: Using reclaimed wood for dashes and buttons (for windows and control panels) and recycled floor mats and rugs (think recyclable and recycled, ultra-modern FLOR tiles) or really cool vintage car buttons and controls (think 1960's Camero or Mustang radio controls, or even gauges) ups your "I'm saving the earth in style" cred.

Specs:

Our car would have competitive specs.  It would be about the same size as a standard compact car and would have a 0-60 time around 8 seconds (comparable to the Chevy Volt).  Even with no gasoline engine, it would be reasonable that our car could get 75-100 miles on a charge (although it could get 200-300 miles if a small gasoline engine was added).

Bonus:
Remove the sound system, speakers, and air conditioning unit to cut your weight down to the bare minimum, and go further on a charge, lowering your impact and upping your monastic mystique (Top of the line Porches meant for serious driving offer this less-is-more option, not for fuel economy, but for performance reasons).


Design:
In order to improve our fuel efficiency, our design is extremely aerodynamic and sleek to boot. Even tiny cutouts above the tires and edges for lift along the back bumper can trim your MPG's (or miles per charge). And The Hatch would be back, as it is so darn useful when you actually need to haul stuff around. A folded back seat and a hatch on a compact car makes room for almost as much stuff as the rear of a typical SUV. The UGC would be designed to turn heads and change minds about the coolness of driving a green vehicle.

Bonus: A sloped roof and hatch back leave room for solar panels, which can power up to 10% of a car's energy (Yale grads driving electric cars across India already proved this one, so no pooh-poohing) so you will need to plug in less, or maybe you can keep the sound system after all. 

So there you have it; the Greenopia green car in its entirety. Some of our material selections may lead to a higher cost but, as with most new products, the longer it is produced the more efficient it will become and the more the cost will drop.  And seriously, what's a couple thousand dollars to leave a decent planet for your kids? Most people who can will drop cash for more horsepower, 'sport' options, and leather seats; the UGC is a much longer-lasting investment.

(Lots of) assistance by Doug Mazeffa, Greenopia's Head of Research.

These days, almost every auto company promotes the greenness of its fleet one way or another.  Some tout their clean emissions , others high miles per gallon, and a few even mention the recycla...
These days, almost every auto company promotes the greenness of its fleet one way or another.  Some tout their clean emissions , others high miles per gallon, and a few even mention the recycla...
 
Comments
14
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

A very informative and interesting article! I will definitely keep these issues in mind when purchasing my next car.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:20 PM on 02/27/2009

We've been moderately in the market researching, driving and evaluating our choices to replace our 11 year old vehicle. Greenopia's auto guide and the article "WWGD" has provided information unattainable anywhere else. Since the ultimate green car of the article is not quite on the market yet, I suppose we will have to settle for something else in the interim. We've been giving careful reflection on Greenopia's suggestions and do intend to be as environmental in our selection as possible.

Great article, thank you!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:56 AM on 03/02/2009

What an insightful article, a green car is so much more than being fuel efficient!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:38 PM on 02/27/2009

If the car companies used computer controlled collision prevention, we could have cars made of the lightest possible materials. They could do it, but the result would be undreamed of mileage, but unfortunately no replacement parts needed when no collisions happen. There are no "accidents", of course, only events we don't want to happen.If the energy storing transmission was used (on any vehicle now produced) mileage would be almost double.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:48 AM on 02/27/2009

Great article, I've read another about the Lotus Eco-Elise Hemp Car that has some equally hopeful ideas, especially about the material in the body of the car.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:42 PM on 02/26/2009
- aceholiday I'm a Fan of aceholiday 4 fans permalink

rip the carpet and sound-deadening out too. less weight, more pickup, and no more cigarette burns

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:54 PM on 02/26/2009

Hey, this is really cool. I hope the design gurus in Stuttgart are listening! Nice work by the Greenopia folks - change can come from any corner!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:44 PM on 02/26/2009

Well now - the Karma is listed at $87k - I'll take TWO! Seriously, it looks very sleek. I can hardly wait to see Daniel Craig wreck it in the next James Bond flick...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:32 PM on 02/26/2009

LOL. The Karma isn't cheap, to be sure, but Mr. Vartan didn't ask for a car that everyone could afford:

"Some of our material selections may lead to a higher cost but, as with most new products, the longer it is produced the more efficient it will become and the more the cost will drop. And seriously, what's a couple thousand dollars to leave a decent planet for your kids? Most people who can will drop cash for more horsepower, 'sport' options, and leather seats; the UGC is a much longer-lasting investment."

I haven't owned a car of any kind for over 15 years. I live withing walking distance of my employment, shopping, and entertainment. I do understand that most people can't give up their personal automobile, but more and more people are returning to the idea that a car SHOULD be a luxury, not a necessity. Green cars are a part of the solution, but we need to return to green urban planning, walkable cities, and sustainable architecture.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:21 PM on 02/26/2009

Finally, a thorough car guide that talks about more than just miles per gallon! Great, informative article.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:21 PM on 02/26/2009

Nice article. It's nice to see someone focus on the overall aspect of the car and not just one area. It makes me nauseous to see certain auto companies promote themselves as green when the action they are taking may be for half of one percent of the car's total impact and they ignore the rest.

You would really think after around a century of producing these things they would be a lot more efficient.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:12 PM on 02/26/2009

I think you want a Fisker Karma.

http://karma.fiskerautomotive.com/

"# Wood trim is sourced from non-living trees such as naturally “fallen trees” as a result of age, “rescued trees” from naturally occurring fires in California, and “sunken trees” found on American lake bottoms.
# The faceted edges of our EcoGlass, made from naturally recyclable sand, offer a luster and brilliance that adds richness and life, underlining the physical strength from its layered glass and resin construction.
# Our most advanced sustainable material series, “EcoChic,” is based on a completely animal-free approach that offers the most luxurious automotive environment. This series uses a soft hand textile composed of 100% Bamboo Viscose and frames authentic fossil leaves inside the EcoGlass."

Let's see: Hybrid electric drivetrain. Aluminum chassis. Aluminum and composite body. Eco-friendly interior. Solar panel roof. Aside from your wanting a hatchback, I think the Karma is your perfect car.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:01 PM on 02/26/2009

Interesting analysis, in particular the comparison of SUV's as a class on its own, which showed that 3 out of the top 5 most green SUV's are American made....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:21 PM on 02/26/2009

Actually, 4 out of the top 5 are American car manufacturer produced, given that Saturn is owned by GM.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:34 PM on 02/26/2009
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect