More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Stefanie Iris Weiss

GET UPDATES FROM Stefanie Iris Weiss
 

How Weiner's Package Became a National Obsession

Posted: 06/14/11 02:05 AM ET

It's just a penis, people. Americans are great at casting aspersions, but are we willing to look at our own lives? The question that's been swirling around my brain since Anthony's Weiner's package first appeared and disappeared on Twitter over Memorial Day weekend is this: why does it matter? Aside from being slightly impressed by what he's packing, I couldn't care less about his personal peccadillos, his sexual tastes, his online relationships with porn stars and blackjack dealers, his wife's reaction or any of it. It's simply not my business.

We all sext. Susan Lipkin's research shows that people from their teens to their 70s are sending provocative photos and other titillating texts to consenting partners old and new. Single people do it, married people do it (with their actual spouses), and yes, adulterers do it. It's just 21st-century flirting, and for all its drawbacks, it brings the rush of endorphins that we crave before or after a tryst. (For teens, it's another story.) Our online intimacies certainly have major implications for the way we relate one-to-one with other human beings. But for adults, it's not scandalous; it just is.

Yes, Weiner is incredibly stupid for risking his career on this. Men in powerful positions tend to think they can get away with anything (see Vitter, Ensign, Edwards, Spitzer, Larry "Wide-stance" Craig, Foley, etc.). But let's peek between the sheets and see if something else is at play here. Our culture is at once the most sexually repressed and hyper-sexualized on earth. This entrenched Puritan ethos is so prevalent that most of us are running 18th-century software in our brains when it comes to sexual mores. We may be revealing more in public, showing more T & A on the TV, but it seems that the guilt gene is still in charge of our reactions to naked body parts and perceived perversions. It's still not OK to be gay. People regularly refer to sex workers as "hookers" (even some feminists I know do this). It's 2011, and our collective sexual maturity is at the level of a 12-year-old boy. And it seems to be getting worse, not better.

This incident and the many that have come before speak to our obsession with the power of the penis. Maybe now that we've seen Weiner's weiner up close and personal, we can grow up and get over it. Penises are nice, necessary and serve a variety of functions. But they shouldn't run men's lives, nor should they by extension run our media. Imagine if women's orgasms were paid this kind of attention? (My theory: we wouldn't have waged wars of choice twice in one decade if the clitoris got half as much attention as the penis does.)

Hypocrisy and sexual repression are, apparently, a heady, irresistible mix to the media. The afternoon that Weiner's surreal press conference hit the airwaves (shown on every local channel in New York City, not just the 24-hour cable networks), we should have been talking about the five soldiers who died that morning in Iraq or the state of the economy.

Weiner has been a real hero on the left. Despite his recent, extremely moronic behavior, he's proven to be incredibly smart and indispensable when it comes to standing up for the little guy. (I agree with him on just about everything but Israel.) Without him, Bernie Sanders, Patrick Leahy and Dennis Kucinich, we'd have no voice in Congress. And his voice has been the loudest, the most insistent. We can't let this profoundly stupid slip-up ruin a champion of our cause. I trust his district will reelect him, because New Yorkers are not so easily scandalized. And the most recent poll of his constituents suggests exactly that. He may even be the mayor of New York someday. But this frenzy is precisely why Ann Coulter and Rush Limbaugh are salivating right now: they think that one of their enemies has been taken down of his own volition. Do we want them to get a win here?

Secrets and lies exist because people are afraid that their fantasies, and desires are dirty. So what if we tilted the paradigm and communicated our real needs to our partners? What if we didn't get married for the wrong reasons? What if we taught children that their body parts aren't naughty? What if we opened our minds and created more space for all kinds of sexuality? What if we got behind marriage equality? What if we stopped being so fake and so righteously religious? The first thing that would happen is that our sex lives would improve. There wouldn't need to be any "Good Wives." We'd never be rocked by a sex scandal again, wasting precious air time and resources on a non-story.

It just takes a little consciousness-raising, and it starts with your relationship to your own body. I hate to break out the old "fear versus love" canard, but it's appropriate here. This is our chance to make the personal truly political, starting in our bedrooms. We'll get more pleasure, and change the world in the process.

 
 
 

Follow Stefanie Iris Weiss on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ecosexuality

 
 
  • Comments
  • 36
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
07:31 PM on 06/16/2011
'How", is the wrong question to be asking. The question should be,' Why?" For weeks, the only thing in the news was the Ryan Plan to kill Medicare, and the Republicans were getting crucified. They were desperate to change the subject, and so the call went out. Who did they call? The top Republican in charge of, "Making Shit Up", Andrew Breitbart. Whadayagot? Whadayagot? Something! Anything! And lo and behold, we got Anthony's folly. And it worked. Nobody's talking about Paul Ryan or Medicare anymore.
06:14 PM on 06/16/2011
Anthony Weiner, a sitting Congressman, saw fit to take several pictures of himself naked in the gym of the House in DC then proceeds to send them on the internet to a group of women he knew nothing about. There is nothing private about that act. If we can not hold politician to a higher standard, then anyone is fit to govern. We don't vote mol$sters, or kill$rs or thieves into office not because we are prudes, but because we are putting them in position of powers that demand a certain level of integrity so they don't abuse it.
06:51 PM on 06/15/2011
When it comes to sex...let the lying begin! I have had pregnant women tell me they have never had sex. I had a patient with obvious herpes lesions tell me he had never been with any one but his wife. When the test came back positive, he said "well, there was that one time when I was on the road.." After 30 yrs of medical practice, I can count the times I've gotten a straight answer about sex.
By the way, please get checked for sexually transmitted diseases. Weiner's sexing was virtual, your partner's may have been real!
12:00 PM on 06/15/2011
Good for you for being one of a very few people who say they agree with Weiner on just about everything but Israel. That describes me, but I don't share your impression of him as "a hero to the left" and "champion of our cause." Completely aside from the so-called scandal, I think Weiner does more harm than good for the simple reason that he is a major contributor to what Deborah Tannen accurately calls "the argument society." In this sense, Weiner is one of a kind with other combative, shouting-prone, overly rhetorical figures such as Rush Limbaugh, Bill O'Reilly, Ann Coulter, Paul Begala and James Carville (at least when they were hosting Crossfire), Michael Moore, and Glenn Beck.

Aside from that, it's not true that "We all sext," and if you're even "slightly impressed" by what Weiner's "packing," you need to get out more.
12:29 PM on 06/15/2011
Correction: The term Tannen uses is "argument culture," not "society," and by it she means ''a pervasive warlike atmosphere that makes us approach public dialogue, and just about anything we need to accomplish, as if it were a fight.''
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John Genryu
Zen Buddhist priest/IT Consultant
10:37 PM on 06/14/2011
Well said Stefanie. American puritanism, double standards and outright hypocrisy are what are at work here and they need to be outed and confronted for the tyrants that they are.
06:01 PM on 06/14/2011
I think Mr. Weiner needs to leave office because of his incredibly bad judgment!! The details of what he did are not particularly relevant, just the fact that he risked so much by this behavior shows he is out of control.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pogo Bock
Not dead.
09:18 AM on 06/15/2011
If bad judgment is your only criterion, you could throw out most of Washington. Or is it only bad judgment by liberals that is your problem?
11:11 AM on 06/15/2011
An elected official's judgement is extremely important since he/she makes decisions for constituents.
I find it extremely telling that you quickly question whether I have a bias against liberals. You're on the wrong track, Pogo Bock. Simmer down and find someone else to converse/argue with you regarding your preconceived notions. Good luck to you!
bigdaveh
if you want rainbows, you have to put up with the
03:50 PM on 06/14/2011
The abhorrent efforts by the press to constantly conflate this issue has nothing to do with veiled Puritanism. It has everything to do with keeping the Dems in check and keeping failures like Palin and Gingrich and the GOP budget/mediscare from taking the spotlight. And anything to keep Pres. Obama from getting any headway on the economy, unemployment, judicial vacancies, ANYTHING to slow down the recovery. Cause you can't have the first black president outshine the last Bush.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Genco
03:24 PM on 06/14/2011
You mention Rush and Ann but no mention of your pals in Hollywood. What a suprise. They make movies about adultery and are afraid to show any love making but they sure are not afraid to show violence and gore galore. Could that be part of the problem?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tygartman
Hoping for Change in 2012
02:21 PM on 06/14/2011
"We all sext."


No we ALL don't.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Stefanie Iris Weiss
Author of "Eco-Sex: Go Green Between the Sheets"
02:56 PM on 06/14/2011
Statistics (quoted in the post) show that a huge number of people are sexting -- not just teens. You may not, but are you judging those who do?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tygartman
Hoping for Change in 2012
03:39 PM on 06/14/2011
Then the article should have said that a majority, not "all", sext. I have informed my three daughters that any type of this activity could indeed become public. If you're into posting naked pictures of yourself for potentially all to see, then there's nothing stopping you, but be prepared for the ramifications. Those that do sext obviously have needs that are not being otherwise met.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mollymac
nice girls seldom get the corner office
02:06 PM on 06/14/2011
excellent post! As a sexual addiction therapist, you stated the obvious; however, even the illustrious democrats are pushing for a guy who clearly has a problem to resign! He has to get help, that we agree on, but if he were a surgeon would that mean he could no longer operate? Wow! Talk about throwing the baby out with the bathwater. I have seen many men who have this affliction, and they often get better because of the consequences of their behavior. Does Weiner deserve any less?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
themightyabealrd
screw the real world-I'm an artist!
12:11 PM on 06/14/2011
There's so much fear and ignorance surrounding sexuality in the U.S. How many kids who identify themselves as homosexual have aken their own lives because they feel inferior or 'wrong'? I never see anyone questioning the underlying (and, to my thinking, faulty) premise that sex is the only thing that defines one's personal identity. Our genitals are simply body parts that serve a number of functions. One of those functions is sexual activity. Sex is merely one part of life and ought to be considered only one of the many things that make up who we are...instead of this big, scary, highly emotional business. Yes, Neo Puritanism is one of the main culprits. Our culture seems to be stuck in this infantile attitude and for people who are capable of thinking independently about sex (and who accept it as just another unremarkable facet of being human), it gets mighty tiresome at times.
DrSnuggles
You label me and I'll label you
11:56 AM on 06/14/2011
Though I agree with Weiner's politics - I cannot agree with the concept that when something like this happens, if it's 'one of our guys' we should try to give them a free pass. I may have read this article wrong and you would imply that no-one should be forced to resign or get this much bad press regardless of their political party in situations like this (in which I would tend to agree), but also, maybe not.

The 'us vs. them' mentality in our political discourse FROM BOTH SIDES is ruining our nation and it needs to stop.

This is not a Republican vs. Democrat issue, this is a 'care about sexting' vs. 'do not care about sexting' issue.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pogo Bock
Not dead.
09:25 AM on 06/15/2011
Okay, Doc, let's look at it your way. I didn't think Chris Lee should have resigned over a shirtless pic. I don't think Anthony Weiner should resign over this. I think there is too much sexual hypocrisy in this country as it is without it infecting our utterly corrupt political system. But words are about ideas. Pictures are very easy to exploit. Given a choice between ideas and exploitation, which do you believe the American mind prefers?

You can't stop the us v. them mentality in our political discourse because a significant part of our population is having its livelihoods and civil rights steadily eroded. Just getting along with the opposition merely guarantees more of the same. This is a real fight, and every cheap win for their side is a blow to ours.

You're right, this is not a Republican v. Democrat issue. This is a full-borne class war.
DrSnuggles
You label me and I'll label you
10:41 AM on 06/15/2011
With respect to the full-borne class war you reference, I agree that it is going on. But if you think the Democrats are anything but the 'other side' you are somewhat mistaken. After every congressional session Rs and Ds are smoking cigars together somewhere laughing because they pulled one over on the American people again. It's like thinking baseball players from opposing teams are actually opposing each other; sure they want to win - but they get paid more if it's a good game.

That's where the 'us vs. them' mentality fails. The reason the middle and lower classes are losing the class war is because they are taking poltical sides based on partisan as opposed to real issues.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:29 AM on 06/14/2011
This Weiner thing is just another 'controver­sy' to keep the cameras of the American hologram pointed away from political corruption­, white collar crime, and war. Killing brown civilians somehow is not controversial.
01:43 PM on 06/14/2011
... and it fills up the vast wasteland that is the 24-hour news cycle.
11:23 AM on 06/14/2011
Sorry but your basic premise is wrong.

Secrets and lie exist largely because some people have no scruples, don't honor their commitments and plain old "want it all" at the same time and think they are better than everyone else and the rules don't apply to them... NOT because they feel their fantasies and desires are "dirty".

It has much more to do with narcissistic personalities and the sociopathic tendencies of people who are highly ambitious.

Maybe YOU feel desires are dirty, but why are you assuming that everyone else does? Many people tell their partner what they want, teach their children to love their body, support marriage equality and get married for the right reasons. And you know what some of them would still be lying cheaters.

I think there is nothing wrong at all with holding our elected officials - who are our employees by the way - to the standard most other employees are held to in terms of keeping the personal and professional worlds separate and not condoning personal behavior when it starts crossing the line over into the professional sphere by abusing or seeming to abuse their position or professional resources or power, or other legal or clear ethic concerns.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:33 AM on 06/14/2011
If we have to accept your "world" view of sex and sexuality, then you need to accept my 18th century version of sex and sexuality....

would you want this person to teach or watch your teeage daughter? Once that is answered, what level of child endangerment is acceptable?

How does this work with feminism and / or not being a sexist?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Stefanie Iris Weiss
Author of "Eco-Sex: Go Green Between the Sheets"
11:09 AM on 06/14/2011
Thanks for the question, happy to answer. I think the 18th century version of sexuality is doing great damage to all of us --- especially our children. They are growing up afraid of their own bodies, of their "naughty" bits, afraid of their desires, and totally unconscious of their true, natural needs. Then they spend a lifetime unraveling the hangups that their parents/teachers/clergy instilled in them. I think this is wrong and unfair, and as we evolve as human beings, it should change.

Anthony Weiner is not applying for a babysitting job -- he is a member of Congress who made a big mistake, a stupid mistake. He didn't do anything untoward with anyone not of age, and thus I think making accusations about pedophilia, which you seem to be insinuating, is totally misplaced here.

My POV regarding sexuality fits perfectly well with my feminism. This idea that women need to be protected from "predators" is the same one that leads cultures to insist on the wearing of burkas, wigs, to walk behind men, not to drive cars, etc. We will never be given real equal status in a world that thinks our sexuality is dangerous, that we are all Eves dangling apples in front of men. That's why we need to be out and upfront about it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:11 PM on 06/14/2011
i did state it clearly enough..... someone who is in Congress should have a higher standard then someone who works in schools.....not the Anthony is being hired as a baby sitter, but that right now we expect a higher standard from a custodian or bus driver at the school then we expect from a Representative or Senator or President (not Obama).....

How can we excuse someone who is representing everyone is his district even if they don't support him politically...... I find it sad that we excuse poor decisions and behavior because they have a perticular political view you support..... no respect for us or the body of government they are part of.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mollymac
nice girls seldom get the corner office
02:10 PM on 06/14/2011
Except that he isn't watching your kid or teaching them! Different set of circumstances entirely. He is a politician and as such, does not do what you are warning about. You are sounding an alarm that isn't relevant. I think he's a brilliant congressman who mess up badly.