More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Stefanie Penn Spear

GET UPDATES FROM Stefanie Penn Spear
 

Keystone Fight Continues as Obama Administration Touts Need for Energy Policy

Posted: 01/23/2012 9:21 am

As I sat with several others at a lunch table last week with Secretary of Energy Steven Chu, who was about to address the City Club of Cleveland, I received a text message that the Obama administration's decision on the Keystone XL pipeline was coming that afternoon. And with that decision to deny the pipeline permit, it was fitting that Chu spoke that day of Obama's plan to reduce oil imports by one-third by 2025, modernize the electric grid, support fuel-efficient vehicles, and invest in renewable energy and energy efficiency.

The rejection of the 2,150-mile tar sands pipeline, to run from Canada to Texas, is a huge victory, but the fight will continue this week with a rally in Washington, D.C. Knowing that the effort to prevent the further extraction of tar sands oil is far from over and to keep the momentum going on the issue, 350.org will hold a rally at noon on Tuesday, Jan. 24 on the West Lawn of the U.S. Capitol Building to "blow the whistle" on the corruption that passes for business as usual on Capitol Hill.

As Bill McKibben, founder of 350.org, said after the pipeline decision last week, Big Oil will do everything it can to overturn this decision and blocking one pipeline isn't enough to stop global warming.

"We'll be fighting to prevent Keystone, but we'll also be fighting to shut off the flow of handouts to the oil, gas and coal industries, and to take away their right to use the atmosphere as an open sewer into which to dump their carbon for free," McKibben said.

Despite strong threats from Big Oil and pressure from Republicans in Congress, who forced the issue by passing a 60-day time limit for a final decision on the project, Obama stood strong stating that the arbitrary nature of this deadline prevented the State Department from gathering the information necessary to approve the project and protect the American people.

However, President Obama's statement on the Keystone XL pipeline, he said that he would continue to look for new ways to partner with the oil and gas industry to increase U.S. energy security -- including the potential development of an oil pipeline from Cushing, Oklahoma to the Gulf of Mexico.

Last weeks landmark decision proves that the power of the people can create change when individuals unite to protect human health and the environment in support of policies that promote energy efficiency, renewable energy and sustainable jobs.

During his 30-minute talk in Cleveland, Chu addressed the intellectual power of the U.S. and how clean energy innovation is a sweet spot for our country. From the most entrepreneurial people on the planet to the expertise and inventiveness of American universities, the U.S. could certainly be the world leader in the green tech industry. However, as Chu pointed out, the U.S. trails far behind other nations, including China, South Korea and Germany, and will fall even further behind once investments made through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act expire.

He talked about how government plays an important role as a first early adopter of new technologies and how policies are needed to guide private investments to get these products to market and to create a draw.

As Chu sees it, if the U.S. is to regain the lead, or even to prevent it from falling further behind, Congress needs to understand the importance of passing legislation that unlocks private investment to provide new technologies a chance to succeed in the competitive market place, thereby renewing the American spirit.

Chu mentioned a time when he was under fire from Congress on how long he thought renewable energy would need incentives to be cost-competitive with fossil fuels. His response was that renewable energy should be competitive in the marketplace without incentives within the next two decades, a much shorter time span than the 100 years of subsidies provided to the oil, gas and coal industries.

In sum, Chu said, we have to get beyond sound bites, realize that energy issues are nonpartisan and that yes, indeed, "government policy drives investment."

 

Follow Stefanie Penn Spear on Twitter: www.twitter.com/EcoWatch

 
 
  • Comments
  • 40
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Quasi Libertarian
Sometimes you get the bear, sometimes it gets you
10:24 AM on 01/24/2012
It is very hard to take the green-bean serious about Keystone when you look at this map of all the pipelines i the US already...­...

http://vec­tor1media.­com/spatia­lsustain/w­p-content/­uploads/20­07/12/all_­pipe.jpg

If you buy into what the green-bean­s are saying, you would think they would be chaining themselves to existing pipelines to get them turned off rather than protesting one that has't been built yet......

I think we know what this is all about.....­..........­.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
capitaldysfunction
White male never voted Republican
04:18 PM on 01/23/2012
Does anyone really think the go ahead for the pipeline will not be signaled after the 2012 election? Of course it will. Everything about the presidency of Barack Obama indicates that a policy reversal will occur when it is safe to do so. Vote Republican or vote Democrat, the tar sands crude is coming.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mhh310351
Roosevelt Democrat
02:28 PM on 01/23/2012
We need an energy policy.

Look at what China is doing!

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124259318084927919.html

an excerpt:

"The U.S. has a problem," Sergio Gabrielli, chief executive of Petrobras, said recently when asked about the loan talks. "There isn't someone in the U.S. government that we can sit down with and have the kinds of discussions we're having with the Chinese."

Mr. Gabrielli was referring to the fact that Chinese government banks are willing to extend huge foreign loans to further China's long-term energy-security goals: ensuring diverse global supplies and winning entree into competitive regions for its oil companies. A string of recent oil loans to Russia, Kazakhstan and others has pushed China's total commitments to more than $45 billion."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Quasi Libertarian
Sometimes you get the bear, sometimes it gets you
10:02 AM on 01/24/2012
Wow.. Didn't Obama give Brazil 2 Billion in oil exploration so they would sell the lions share to the US?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mhh310351
Roosevelt Democrat
11:30 AM on 01/24/2012
No, not the lion's share just some.
China is giving 10 billion.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
scorpions5
Intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe
11:53 AM on 01/23/2012
So what are the plans of this new energy? Will the poor and middle class be able to afford solar energy? If we take away the coal and the oil what are we replacing it with? Solar energy, wind energy? That has not worked out very well so far. Before we can even think of disgarding how we get energy we have to have in place alternative sources that are working for all. That is expensive and will take years and years for everyone to be able to use. I have no problem with alternative energy sources, but they better be in place for all of us before they get rid of the energy we have now. And they better make it inexpensive for everyone. We saw that Spain tried this and it didn't work out well for them. I want to know how they plan on doing this. So far it is just talk, but no specific plans. Show me the actual plans, show me what will work and how we can do this. I don't see anything but talk, and this has been going on for years.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrBIgp
Maybe I'm wrong, but....
01:53 PM on 01/23/2012
Sometimes I thing the green energy policy is to oppose any proven energy source. As wind power is starting to make a marginal contribution, there is a growing resistance to it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
scorpions5
Intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe
02:36 PM on 01/23/2012
Wind energy can only be built in certain areas because you have to worry about how it would affect the floral and fauna. It takes up a lot of open space. It takes hundreds of wind turbines to generate enough electricity to cover a marginal amount of homes. And of course it is not realible. I think thermal energy, tapping into the earth's heat is a good option, but then again it depends on where you live. Japan uses it for most of their energy, but they have many hot spots they can tap into. I still think nuclear energy is the way to go, it is clean, inexpensive and it is relatively safe, if you don't live near an ocean where salt water could get to it. I personally think solar energy is too hard to harness as of yet.
photo
RonGallion
I am John Galt
12:38 AM on 01/24/2012
The resistance is a windmill is loud, I went to wind rock in TN to ride my ATV and had a close up view of those windmills, they are giant and noisy I could hear them 1/2 mile away. No wonder people do not want these things in residential areas.
12:58 PM on 01/24/2012
i read an article just a few weeks ago that reported that are there are 5 midwestern states (don't remember which ones) that are now getting 20% of their power from wind so, no, it's not just talk. and, we have an electric truck and an electric scooter that we use daily
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
scorpions5
Intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe
02:29 PM on 01/24/2012
And where does the other 80% come from? 20% is a drop in the bucket.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
emmanuel kalu
commonsense
11:35 AM on 01/23/2012
Blocking this pipeline was the single best move done by the president this year. This pipeline is a clear give away to the oil companies at the huge expense to the american people in so many ways. It was a good move especially in light of the republicans trying to force the hand of the president. This country needs to serious and effectively work toward completely reducing our oil demand. Where is the support for promotion more electric cars, especially the ones by Gm. The govt and private companies should invest in recharging station across the country. This would increase the range of electric cars, provide huge demand for GM, which in turn create more jobs. It would greatly reduce our importation of oil from other countries. It is time we really push for alternative energy.
photo
artleads
Let's have a national retreat.
07:16 AM on 01/24/2012
Ah yes. Electric cars and power hubs. I forgot to mention these among the German energy innovations above: (7:10 AM).
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lbsaltzman
Permaculture and Sustainability
11:11 AM on 01/23/2012
I hope a lot of people read this excellent article. The President is really trying to do something intelligent about energy. He needs the support of Congress that is not made up of dinosaurs. lets through the Republicans out this year.
photo
artleads
Let's have a national retreat.
09:38 PM on 01/23/2012
I lean toward this view myself. But it;s ultimately up to the people to push for distributed, point-of-use energy that ordinary people can use for their own independent needs and possibly a means of income by selling excess back to the grid. Germany appears to be well on the way to converting the country in this direction. ("The Third Industrial Revolution" by Jeremy Rifkin) We would be wise to do likewise, giving it our usual exuberant American twist
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lbsaltzman
Permaculture and Sustainability
11:08 PM on 01/23/2012
I think we could do far worse than to emulate what Germany has done.
08:53 PM on 01/26/2012
Yes. Distributed generation is the best way to go. We need to put the proper incentives in place to encourage homeowners and businesses to invest in renewable energy that will generate power onsite.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Norma Ward
10:58 AM on 01/23/2012
As shown in this article, it is unlikely that oil sands production levels will ever reach the levels proposed by Enbridge, making it more likely that Canada will have to import increasing volumes of oil:

http://viableopposition.blogspot.com/2012/01/canadas-oil-sands-are-we-exporting.html

Canada's domestic energy security should be prioritized above pipeline company profits and well above long-term energy security for China.
nothingchanges
too soon old, too late smart
10:38 AM on 01/23/2012
Energy Policy?

We don need no steenkin Energy Policy

Latest estimates indicate that the US has now spent over 4 Trillion dollars on the War in Iraq. A war basically over "cheap" oil.

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/iraq-war-ends-with-a-4-trillion-iou-2011-12-15

THINK of how much could have been accomplished by spending only HALF of that amount, on research and development of alternative, renewable, energy resources here at home.

President Carter got it right back in 1977. US foreign energy dependence lowered by nearly 30% during his administration, then quickly expanded after Republicans took power.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/primary-resources/carter-energy/

For being the supposedly most intelligent species on Earth. We sure don't learn much.

Man, the only animal with an intellect advanced enough to have created both a written and spoken language, then some of us learned (politicians) to lie convincingly........ and screwed it all up.

What a waste.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrBIgp
Maybe I'm wrong, but....
01:46 PM on 01/23/2012
Imported oil dropped under President Carter, but the price of oil increased. We were investing in synthetic fuel ad domestic production when OPEC flooded the market with oil - the price dropped and we started importing more oil.
Our biggest mistake was not taxing imported oil with the price dropped. Unfortunately, higher gas prices are lethal to elected politicians.